In the High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH ON THE 14 T H DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.83979/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SHANKARGOUDA S/O. SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELGAUM. 2. BHIMANAGOUDA S/O. SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELGAUM 3. LAKKAVVA W/O. VENKANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSEHOLD, R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELGAUM. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MALLIKARJUN S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE.) AND 1. BASANAGOUDA S/O. SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELGAUM 2. NEELAVVA W/O. GURANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM : 2 : 3. SHIVANAGOUDA S/O. GURANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 4. LAKKAVVA W/O. BASAPPA BUDI AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. ANEGUDDI, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 5. SUJATA W/O. SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 6. MUDIGOUDA S/O. SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: GOVT. SERVICE R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 7. MALLANAGOUDA S/O. SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 8. MALLAVVA W/O.SHIDLINGAPPA BUDI AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. ANEGUDDI TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 9. SHANTAVVA W/O.BHIMAPPA TEGGINAMANI AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. VASAN, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 10. HANAMANTAGOUDA A/F. HOLEPPA KHANAPUR AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. KITTUR, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 11. REGIONAL MANAGER SYNDICATE BANK/REGIONAL OFFICER, : 3 : SHANBHAG CHAMBERS, KIRLOSKAR ROAD, BELGAUM, DIST: BELGAUM. 12. THE BRANCH MANAGER SYNDICATE BANK, SUREBAN BRANCH, SUREBAN, TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELGAUM 13. KUMAR. SHARANAPPAGOUDA S/O. VENKANGOUDA PATIL AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 14. MAILARAPPA S/O. BASAVANTAPPA PATTANSHETTI AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & BUSINESS R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 15. IRAPPA S/O. BASAVANTAPPA PATTANSHETTI AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & BUSINESS R/O. HAMPIHOLI, TQ: RAMDURG DIST: BELGAUM 16. JANAVVA W/O. GANGAPPA BETASUR AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. SHIRASANGI, TQ: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELGAUM ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 26.09.2013, IN O.S.NO.72/2010, PASSED BY CIVIL JUDGE, RAMDURG ON I.A.NO.5 FILED UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) OF CPC FILED BY THE PROPOSED DEFENDANTS NO.13 TO 15, AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND DISMISS THE I.A.NO.5, FILED BY THE PROPOSED DEFENDANTS NO.13 TO 15, ETC.,. : 4 : THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER In the suit filed by the respondents for partition and separate possession, an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of CPC was filed by the proposed defendants to implead themselves as defendants 13 to 15. The trial Court, by the impugned order, allowed the same. Hence the present petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the impugned order is bad in law and liable to be set aside. 3. On hearing learned counsel and considering the impugned order, I’am of the considered view that there is no error that calls for any interference. The averments made in the application would show that they are the : 5 : necessary and proper parties for adjudication of the suit. Whether they are entitled for any share or not is a matter to be decided at the trial of the suit. As of now it is only just and necessary that they be impleaded as defendants in the suit, since they are necessary and proper parties. 4. Consequently, the petition being devoid of merit is dismissed. SD/- JUDGE Mrk/-.