DOCSLIB.ORG

Quality of Surface Waters in the Lower Columbia River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Quality of Surface Waters in the Lower Columbia River Baein By J. F. SANTOS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1784 A discussion of the chemical quality of streams tributary to the lower Columbia River basin and of the physical and sanitary quality of many of the streams; includes data on radioactivity of the main stem UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Santos, John Francis 1921- Quality of surface waters in the lower Columl ia River basin. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1965. iv, 78 p. maps, diagrs., table. 24 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Water-supply paper 1784) Bibliography: p. 72-73. 1. Water Analysis. 2. Water-supply Columbia River basin. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 30 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract___ _____________________________________________________ 1 Introduction._ ______________________---_______________----_-_-__-- 2 Purpose and scope of investigation___________-____-_-_-_---__-- 2 Previous investigations.__-_______---______________-----_----_-- 2 Acknowledgments. ____________________________________________ 4 Description of lower Columbia River basin.__ ____________________ 5 Precipitation and runoff.________-___________-_____---___---___- 5 Expression of results.______________________-__-______--_---_._- 8 Streams tributary to the lower Columbia River_____-______--___-_--___ 9 Walla Walla River_________________________________________ 9 Umatilla River and Willow Creek-______________________________ 14 John Day River_______________________________________________ 19 Deschutes River.______________-_____-_-_-__-_-_-_--___--___- 23 Klickitat River__________________________-_-_-_---------__-_ 28 Mount Hood streams._-___-____-_-_-_________-____----_-__---- 30 Willamette River____________________________________________ 32 Lewis River_____-________-_______-----___---_-_-_-_--_----_- 44 Cowlitz River.________________________________________________ 46 Tributaries to the Columbia River below the Cowlitz River___-__--_ 49 Columbia River main stem_________________________________________ 50 Chemical quality____________________---_--_-_____--__-_--____- 51 Salinity of the tidal portion of the Columbia River________________ 56 Pollution. __________________________________________________ 57 Radioactivity _________________________________________________ 58 Water use.___________________________________________________ 61 Conclusions_ _ _---_-_______-_____________----_______--____-----__ 64 Selected references.._______________________________________________ 72 Index_ ___________________________________________________________ 75 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Location of sampling stations in the lower Columbia River basin_______________________________________________ 3 2. Water discharge of major streams in the lower Columbia River basin. ____________________________________ 6 3. Mean annual discharge characteristics of selected streams in the lower Columbia River basin______________________ 7 4. Chemical quality of water of the Walla Walla River near Touchet, Wash_______________________________ 11 5. Relation of salinity to water discharge, Walla Walla River near Touchet, Wash________________________________ 12 6. Chemical characteristics of water in Willow Creek, Oreg____ 16 7. Chemical characteristics of water in the Umatilla River and Willow Creek, Oreg_________________________ 18 IV CONTENTS Page FIGURE 8. Relation of hardness to water discharge, John Day River at Service Creek, Oreg____________________.-_____________ 21 9. Chemical composition of water in the John Day River basin, Oregon_ ____________________________________________ 22 10. Frequency distribution of dissolved solids, Deschutes RiTTer at Moody, Oreg________________________________ 26 11. Chemical characteristics of water in the Klickitat River basin, Washington________________________________________ 29 12. Relation of salinity to water discharge, McKenzie River at McKenzie Bridge, Oreg.______________________________ 35 13-15. Frequency distribution, Willamette River at Salem, Oreg.: 13. Dissolved solids___________________________ 36 14. Temperature readings_____________________________ 37 15. Hardness________________________________________ 37 16. Annual salt load of the Willamette River at Salem, Ore2;____ 38 17. Comparison of cross-sectional variations in specific con­ ductance in the Willamette River at Portland, Oreg______ 38 18. Cross-sectional variation in specific conductance in the Willamette River at Portland, Oreg_____________________ 39 19. Chemical composition of water in the Willamette River basin, Oregon._____________________________________________ 40 20. Bacterial contamination in the main stem of the Willamette River, Oreg________________________________________ 43 21. Chemical composition of water during periods of different discharge, Lewis River at Ariel, Wash___________________ 45 22. Chemical composition of water in the Cowlitz River basin, Washington___ _____________________________________ 47 23. Dissolved solids transported by the Cowlitz River at Castle Rock, Wash_______________..____________ 49 24. Annual salt load of the Columbia River near The Dalles, Oreg__________________________________ 53 25-27. Frequency distribution, Columbia River near The Dalles, Oreg.: 25. Dissolved solids________________________________ 53 26. Temperature readings_________________-__--_--_-_- 54 27. Hardness________________________________ 54 28. Location of quality-of-water sampling points on the lower Columbia River______________________________________ 55 29. Variation of radioactivity in the Columbia River___________ 60 TABLE Page TABLE 1. Representative chemical analyses of water________________ 66 QUALITY OF SURFACE WATERS IN THE LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN By J. F. SANTOS ABSTRACT This report, made during 1959-60, provides reconnaissance data on the quality of waters in the lower Columbia River basin; information on present and future water problems in the basin; and data that can be employed both in water-use studies and in planning future industrial, municipal, and agricultural expansion within this area. The lower Columbia River basin consists of approximately 46,000 square miles downstream from the confluence of the Snake and Columbia Rivers The region can be divided into three geographic areas. The first is the heavily forested, sparsely populated mountain regions in which quality of water in general is related to geologic and climatological factors. The second is a seiriarid plateau east of the Cascade Mountains; there differences in geology and precipitation, together with more intensive use of available water for irrigation, bring about marked differences in water quality. The third is the Willamette-Puget trough area in which are concentrated most of the industry and population and in which water quality is influenced by sewage and industrial waste disposal. The majority of the streams in the lower Columbia River basin are calcium magnesium bicarbonate waters. In general, the rivers rising in the Coast Range and on the west slope of the Cascade Range contain less than 100 parts per mil­ lion of dissolved solids, and hardness of the water is less than 50 parts per million. Headwater reaches of the streams on the east slope of the Cascade Range are similar to those on the west slope; but, downstream, irrigation return flows cause the dissolved-solids content and hardness to increase. Most of the waters, however, remain calcium magnesium bicarbonate in type. The highest observed dissolved-solids concentrations and also some changes in chemical com­ position occur in the streams draining the more arid parts of the area. In these parts, irrigation is chiefly responsible for increasing the dissolved-solids con­ centration and altering the chemical composition of the streams. C?he maximum dissolved-solids concentration and hardness of water observed in major irriga­ tion areas were 507 and 262 parts per million, respectively, for the Walla Walla River near Touchet, Wash. In terms of the U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff classification (1954, p. 80), water in most streams in the basin has low salinity and sodium hazards and is suitable for irrigation. A salt-balance problem does exist in the Hermiston- Stanfield, Oreg., area of the Umatilla River basin, and because of poor drainage, improper irrigation practices could cause salt-balance problems in fre Willamette River Valley, Oreg., in which irrigation is rapidly increasing. 2 SURFACE WATERS, LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Pollution by sewage disposal has reached undesirable levels in the Walla Walla River, in the Willamette River from Eugene to Portland, Oreg., and in the Columbia River from Portland to Puget Island. In the lower reaches of the Willamette River, the pollution load from sewage and industrial-waste disposal at times depletes the dissolved oxygen in the water to concentrations below what is considered necessary for aquatic life. Water in most of the tributaries to the lower Columbia River is of excellent quality and after some treatment could be used for industrial and municipal supplies. The principal treatment required would be disinfection and turbidity removal. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION This investigation, made during 1959-60,
Recommended publications
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources

    Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources

    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
  • Crooked River Restoration

    Crooked River Restoration

    9/27/2019 Crooked River ‐ Native Fish Society Region: Oregon District: Mid-Columbia Summary The Crooked River, in central Oregon, is a large tributary to the Deschutes River. It runs for approximately 155 miles and the basin drains nearly 4,300 square miles. Native Species Spring Chinook Salmon Summer Steelhead Redband Trout Bull-trout-esa-listed The Crooked River The Crooked River has three major headwater tributaries, the North Fork, South Fork, and Beaver Creek which join to make the mainstem as it flows through Paulina Valley. Further down, Bowman Dam, creates Prineville Reservoir. Below Bowman, eight miles of the river are designated Wild and Scenic as it traverses a steep desert canyon. In Prineville it is joined by Ochoco Creek, soon to collect McKay Creek and several smaller tributaries. It empties into Lake Billy Chinook, a large impoundment on the Deschutes created by Round Butte Dam. This dam inundates nine miles of historic river channel. The Crooked River and its tributaries were once a major spawning ground for anadromous fish such as spring Chinook Salmon, Steelhead trout, and Pacific lamprey. Non-migratory fish such as Redband trout and Bull trout, as well as various non-game fish were also abundant. Fish populations began to drop in the early 19th century due to irrigation withdrawals. https://nativefishsociety.org/watersheds/crooked‐river 1 9/27/2019 Crooked River ‐ Native Fish Society The Cove Power Plant on the lower Crooked River, built around 1910, effectively blocked upriver migration of spring Chinook salmon during low stream flow conditions. In addition, Ochoco Dam, built in 1920 on Ochoco Creek, blocked fish passage completely.
  • Molalla River-Table Rock Recreation Area Management Plan and Decision Record

    Molalla River-Table Rock Recreation Area Management Plan and Decision Record

    Molalla River-Table Rock Recreation Area Management Plan and Decision Record Environmental Assessment Number: DOI-BLM-OR-S040-2010-0003-EA July 2011 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, Salem District Clackamas County, Oregon T6S-R3E, T7S-R3E, T7S-R4E, T7S R5E, Willamette Meridian Clackamas County, Oregon Responsible Agency: USDI - Bureau of Land Management Responsible Official: Cindy Enstrom, Field Manager Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 315-5969 For further information, contact: Zachary Jarrett, Project Lead Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 375-5610 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/AE-11/021+1792 Molalla River-Table Rock Recreation Area Management Plan and DR July 2011 2 Table of Contents Interdisciplinary Team of Preparers ...............................................................................................
  • What's Happening on the Deschutes River

    What's Happening on the Deschutes River

    The Plain Facts What’s happening on the Deschutes River The Deschutes River system is an Oregon icon, treasured for its scenic beauty, the life-giving water it brings to the high desert, and its world-class salmon, steelhead and trout fisheries. But the river and its tributaries are more than that: they’re sacred to the people of the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs and an integral part of the culture and economy of the region. As co-owners of the Pelton Round Butte Hydroelectric Project, Portland General Electric and the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs pay close attention to the health of the river. We know that apparent changes to the Deschutes — some good, some troubling — have raised questions among river users in the region, so we want to share what we know about what’s happening on the Deschutes. This pamphlet addresses some of the concerns and misconceptions we’ve heard. The information is based on robust and high quality scientific studies. You can find more at portlandgeneral.com/deschutes. We also welcome questions at [email protected] or 541-325-0960. Management You may have heard: The plain fact is… The Deschutes River is in The Deschutes River is not in decline. a state of rapid decline. • River temperatures have returned to their historic, seasonal patterns. • Fall Chinook are migrating and returning more successfully than any time since the 1960s. • Redband trout populations and their insect food sources remain robust. • The latest Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife angler surveys — from 2018 and previous years — have shown excellent catch rates.
  • Draft North Cascade 2012 Implementation Plan

    Draft North Cascade 2012 Implementation Plan

    North Cascade District Implementation Plan June 2012 Table of Contents Page Introduction ____________________________________________________________ 1 District Overview ________________________________________________________ 3 Land Ownership ______________________________________________________ 3 Forest Land Management Classification ____________________________________ 3 Background ________________________________________________________ 3 Major Change to FLMCS _____________________________________________ 4 Current Condition _____________________________________________________ 6 History ___________________________________________________________ 6 Physical Elements _____________________________________________________ 7 Geology and Soils ___________________________________________________ 7 Topography ________________________________________________________ 9 Water ____________________________________________________________ 9 Climate ___________________________________________________________ 9 Natural Disturbance _________________________________________________ 9 Biological Elements __________________________________________________ 10 Vegetation ________________________________________________________ 10 Forest Health _____________________________________________________ 11 Fish and Wildlife __________________________________________________ 11 Human Uses ________________________________________________________ 16 Forest Management ________________________________________________ 16 Roads ___________________________________________________________
  • State Waterway Navigability Determination

    State Waterway Navigability Determination

    BODY OF WATER & LOCATION NAV CG NON-NAV CG REMARKS yellow highlight = apply to USCG for permit up to RM stipulated Alsea Bay, OR X Estuary of Pacific Ocean. Alsea River, OR X Flows into Alsea Bay, Waldport, OR. Navigable to mile 13. Ash Creek, OR X Tributary of Willamette River at Independence, OR. Barrett Slough, OR X Tributary of Lewis and Clark River. Bayou St. John, OR X Court decision, 1935 AMC 594, 10 Mile Lake, Coos County, OR. Bear Creek (Coos County), OR X Tributary of Coquille River (tidal at mile 0.5) Beaver Creek, OR X Tributary of Nestucca River. Beaver Slough, OR X See Clatskanie River. Big Creek (Lane County), OR X At U.S. 101 bridge (tidal). Big Creek (Lincoln County), OR X Flows into Pacific Ocean. Big Creek Slough, OR X Upstream end at Knappa, OR (tidal). At site of Birch Creek (Sparks) Bridge on Canyon Road near Birch Creek, OR X Pendleton, OR. Side channel of Yaquina River. 3 mi. downstream from Toledo, Blind Slough, OR X OR (tidal). Tributary of Knappa Slough. 10 mi. upstream from Astoria, OR Blind Slough/ Gnat Creek, OR X (tidal at mile 2.0). Boone Slough, OR X Tributary of Yaquina River between Newport and Toledo, OR. Side channel of Willamette River. 3 miles upstream from Booneville Channel, OR X Corvallis, OR. Boulder Creek, OR X 7 miles N of Lake Quinalt. Side channel of Columbia River. 5 miles N of Clatskanie, OR Bradbury Slough, OR X (tidal). Brownlee Reservoir, ID /OR X See Snake River. Also known as South Channel.
  • John Day River RMP Final

    John Day River RMP Final

    JOHN DAY RIVER PROPOSED MANAGEMENT PLAN, TWO RIVERS AND JOHN DAY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT JOHN DAY RIVER PLAN AND EIS Comment Period Ending 3/03/00 Table of Contents Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................1 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC MEETINGS .......................................................................................................................1 Redmond, Oregon.....................................................................................................................................1 Public Questions and Comments ...............................................................................................1 Salem, Oregon2 Public Questions and Comments ...............................................................................................2 Clackamas, Oregon ..................................................................................................................................4 Public Questions and Comments ...............................................................................................4 Fossil, Oregon6 Public Questions and Comments ...............................................................................................6 John Day, Oregon ......................................................................................................................................8
  • The Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (DBHCP)

    The Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (DBHCP)

    Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan NEPA Public Scoping August 14, 2017 – Madras, OR August 15, 2017 – Bend, OR The Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (DBHCP) An HCP is required for activities covered by an Incidental Take Permit issued under the Federal Endangered Species Act Deschutes Basin HCP will modify Irrigation District and City of Prineville activities to minimize and mitigate the impacts of those activities on the species covered by the Incidental Take Permits Has been in collaborative development since 2010 DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 DBHCP Covered Parties Eight Irrigation Districts of the Deschutes Basin Board of Control (DBBC) • Arnold Irrigation District (AID) • Central Oregon Irrigation District (COID) • Lone Pine Irrigation District (LPID) • North Unit Irrigation District (NUID) • Ochoco Irrigation District (OID) • Swalley Irrigation District (SID) • Three Sisters Irrigation District (TSID) • Tumalo Irrigation District (TID) City of Prineville, Oregon DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 DBHCP Covered Species Bull Trout Middle Columbia River Steelhead Trout Middle Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Deschutes River Summer/Fall Chinook Salmon Sockeye Salmon Oregon Spotted Frog DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 DBHCP Covered Activities Storage and Release of Irrigation Water Diversion of Irrigation Water Conveyance and Delivery of Irrigation Water Irrigation Return Flows Existing Hydropower City of Prineville Activities DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 Storage and Release of Water Five Main
  • Upper Deschutes River Fish Managementplan

    Upper Deschutes River Fish Managementplan

    Upper Deschutes River Fish ManagementPlan Draft May22, 1996 Oregon Department of Fish and Wtldlife Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Page 1 of 431 Upper Deschutes River Basin Fish Management Plan 1996 COMPLETED DISTRICT DRAFT 04/11/96 6:12:58 PM DESCHUTES RIVER from Wickiup Dam to Bend (North Canal Dam) including the tributaries Fall River and Spring River Overview This portion of the basin plan includes the Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam (RM 227) downstream to Bend (North Canal Dam, RM 164.8), Fall River, and Spring River. The Little Deschutes River, a major tributary which enters at RM 193, is not included because of its' length and connection with other waters in the basin. The Little Deschutes River will be presented in a separate section of the basin plan. In the Habitat and Fish Management sections of the following discussion, the Deschutes River will be divided into two sections; Wickiup Dam to Benham Falls (RM 181), and Benham Falls to Bend (North Canal Dam). The reason for this is based on stream morphology and changes in fish populations. Benham Falls is a high gradient natural cascade which separates the Deschutes River into two logical sections with low gradient above the falls and high gradient below. Similarly, fish population composition changes at Benham Falls with brown trout dominant above and rainbow trout dominant below. The remaining sections; location and ownership, fish stocking history, angling regulations, management issues, summary of alternatives and alternatives will be presented as (1) Deschutes River, and (2) Tributaries. In 1987, the Oregon legislature designated the section of Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam to General Patch Bridge, and from Harper Bridge to the north boundary of the Deschutes National Forest as a State Scenic Waterway.
  • 1. Santiam Molalla History, Culture, and Geography the Name “Molalla

    1. Santiam Molalla History, Culture, and Geography the Name “Molalla

    1 1. Santiam Molalla History, Culture, and Geography The name “Molalla” has at least 27 historical spellings. It is said to be derived from the words “moolek” for elk and “olilla” for berries (Winkler 1984). This would seemingly be a good name for their land, which produced abundant elk and berries, as well as for the people, who were known to extensively trade specialty products from these plants and animals. Preserved huckleberries and blackberries, elk hides, jerked meat, and elkhorn spoons were all trade goods associated with Molallans. Beargrass and willow weaving materials were also important trade items, due to their universal value and general abundance in Molalla lands. The Santiam Molalla were known as good elk hunters, good berry pickers, accomplished traders, bitter and fierce enemies of the Cayuse to the east, and good friends, family, and business associates with the Klamath to the south. They were also said to be poor guides when more than 35 miles from their homes, indicating a relatively concentrated and productive Tribal territory of seasonal use and trade route patterns (Minto 1903). Molallan Geography. Very little is known about the Molallan history or culture (Winkler 1984; Ruby and Brown 1986; Zenk and Rigsby 1998), but there is good agreement on early historical Molallan geography. During the 1750- 1850 late precontact/early historical time period of this study, Molallans occupied nearly the entire western slope of the Oregon Cascades Range, from the Columbia River south, almost to California. The Molalla are believed to have been organized into three, or possibly four, major “bands,” or tribes.
  • Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan 2011

    Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan 2011

    Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan Prepared for Molalla River Watch / Molalla River Watershed Council and Molalla River Improvement District Prepared by Cascade Environmental Group, LLC 222 NW Davis Street, Suite 317 Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 894‐8585 Contact: John Runyon November 2011 Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan — November 2011 Contents Section Page Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Watershed Setting ................................................................................................................... 5 Issues and Restoration Approaches ....................................................................................... 8 Flooding ....................................................................................................................... 9 Low Flows and High Water Temperatures ................................................................ 10 Habitat Modifications ................................................................................................. 10 Fragmentation of Wildlife Habitat .............................................................................. 11 ESA-Listed Fish ......................................................................................................... 11 General River and Floodplain Characteristics ....................................................................... 13 Coordinate Systems Used ........................................................................................
  • Luelling River Retreat Has Been in the Same and Brown Trout

    Luelling River Retreat Has Been in the Same and Brown Trout

    Luell ingMADRAS, River OREGON Retreat Hunting | Ranching | Fly Fishing | Conservation MADRAS,Luell ing OREGON River Retreat Introduction: Play video of the property Located north of Madras, Oregon, the Luelling River from April through December. In addition, the Deschutes Retreat is positioned on 155.38± acres with approximately River is host to a large run of summer steelhead and an one mile of deeded river frontage along the famed 100- increasing population of spring chinook salmon and mile Lower Deschutes River. Situated in scenic Central sockeye salmon, as well as smaller populations of bull trout Oregon, Luelling River Retreat has been in the same and brown trout. With excellent fishing opportunities, family since the turn of the 20th century. This property is this rare property provides excellent access to the sought- rare because it is both the only riverfront house along the after Lower Deschutes River. This is a rare chance for 10-mile Warm Springs to Trout Creek fly water section ownership on this world-class river. and one of only approximately 20 houses on the entire Lower Deschutes River. Constructed in the 1970s prior to the enactment of the Wild & Scenic Act on the Lower Deschutes, the custom-designed home and attached garage is comprised of 3,550 sqft with 5 bedrooms and 2.5 baths, featuring two kitchens, two large stone fireplaces, windows that run the majority of both levels facing the river and a deck overlooking the river and pasture. A large 1,500 sqft detached barn, tack room and shop provides ample room for ranch implements and recreational gear storage.