DOCSLIB.ORG

Screening, Down-Selection, Characterization, and Genetic Tool

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Screening, Down-Selection, Characterization, and Genetic Tool SCREENING, DOWN-SELECTION, CHARACTERIZATION, AND GENETIC TOOL DEVELOPMENT IN HIGH-PRODUCTIVITY MICROALGAE by Lukas Royce Dahlin A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Applied Chemistry). Golden, Colorado Date: Signed: Lukas R. Dahlin Signed: Dr. Matthew C. Posewitz Thesis Advisor Signed: Dr. Michael T. Guarnieri Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date: Signed: Dr. Thomas Gennett Professor and Head Department of Chemistry ii ABSTRACT Microalgae are a promising source of renewable biomass, and biocatalysts which can be utilized for the renewable production of fuel and chemical intermediates. During the time the work of this thesis was pursued microalgal productivity was recognized as a limiting factor to achieve competitive pricing with fossil fuel alternatives. To address this, a microalgal culture collection was screened, down-selecting for promising strains showing robust growth under relevant outdoor conditions. After isolating several promising strains, they were further characterized, ultimately leading to the identification of strains for robust winter and summer cultivation. Winter strains were grown outdoors in 1000 L raceway ponds in February of 2016 to confirm and characterize real world growth metrics. Two promising summer isolates were identified, Picochlorum renovo and Scenedesmus sp. These two strains both display high productivity, however, have remarkably different life cycles. Picochlorum renovo has a compact genome, grows rapidly, undergoes cell division during both day and night, and once nitrogen deprived photosynthesis ceases. In contrast, Scenedesmus sp. has a relatively large genome, regulates cell division to occur during dark periods, and has a remarkably high photosynthetic rate when nitrogen deprived. To further enhance growth and enable basic science inquiries genetic tools were developed for Picochlorum renovo. Tools necessary for the overexpression of proteins from either the nuclear or chloroplast genomes were developed. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. xii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Motivation ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background and Previous Work ............................................................................. 3 1.3 Outline of Chapters ................................................................................................. 6 1.4 References ............................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2 DOWN-SELECTION AND OUTDOOR EVALUATION OF NOVEL HALOTOLERANT ALGAL STRAINS FOR WINTER CULTIVATION ........................................................................................ 11 2.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Results ................................................................................................................... 14 2.3.1 Indoor Screening .......................................................................................... 14 2.3.2 Outdoor Deployment ................................................................................... 15 2.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 21 2.4.1 Indoor Screening .......................................................................................... 21 2.4.2 Outdoor Deployment ................................................................................... 23 2.5 Methods................................................................................................................. 26 2.5.1 Culture Collection Screening ....................................................................... 26 2.5.2 18S Sequencing ............................................................................................ 28 2.5.3 Outdoor Growth ........................................................................................... 28 2.5.4 Compositional Analysis ............................................................................... 29 2.6 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 30 2.7 References ............................................................................................................. 31 iv CHAPTER 3 RECENT ADVANCES IN ALGAL GENETIC TOOL DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 35 3.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 35 3.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 36 3.3 Random Gene Integration and Homologous Recombination ............................... 37 3.4 Multi-copy Gene Expression and Expression Control.......................................... 39 3.5 In vivo genome editing ......................................................................................... 41 3.6 Technical Hurdles and Considerations ................................................................. 43 3.7 Concluding Remarks ............................................................................................. 44 3.8 References ............................................................................................................. 46 CHAPTER 4 DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH-PRODUCTIVITY, HALOPHILIC, THERMOTOLERANT MICROALGA, PICOCHLORUM RENOVO ...... 50 4.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 50 4.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 51 4.3 Results ................................................................................................................... 52 4.3.1 Down-Selection, Physiology, and Compositional Analysis ........................ 52 4.3.2 Genomic Analysis and Speciation ............................................................... 55 4.3.3 Transcriptome Response to Salinity............................................................. 59 4.3.4 Nuclear and Chloroplast Engineering .......................................................... 60 4.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 63 4.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 67 4.6 Methods................................................................................................................. 68 4.6.1 Strain Screening and Characterization of Algal Growth.............................. 68 4.6.2 Compositional Analysis ............................................................................... 70 4.6.3 Genome Sequencing, Assembly and Annotation ......................................... 70 4.6.4 Transcriptome Response to Salinity............................................................. 71 4.6.5 Nuclear Engineering..................................................................................... 73 4.6.6 Chloroplast Engineering............................................................................... 74 4.6.7 Fluorescent Plate Reader Analysis ............................................................... 75 4.6.8 Statistics and Reproducibility ...................................................................... 76 4.6.9 Microscopy ................................................................................................... 76 4.7 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 77 v 4.8 Data Availability ................................................................................................... 77 4.9 References ............................................................................................................. 78 CHAPTER 5 CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL SCENEDESMUS....................... 83 5.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 83 5.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 83 5.3 Results ................................................................................................................... 84 5.3.1 Strain Down-Selection, Physiology, and Compositional Analysis .............. 84 5.3.2 Preliminary Genetic Engineering ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Potential of Chlorella Species As Feedstock for Bioenergy Production: a Review
    Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 203–220 https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0067 https://content.sciendo.com Potential of Chlorella Species as Feedstock for Bioenergy Production: A Review Baiba IEVINA1*, Francesco ROMAGNOLI2 1, 2 Institute of Energy systems and environment, Riga Technical University, Āzenes 12-k1, Riga, Latvia Abstract – Selection of appropriate microalgae strain for cultivation is essential for overall success of large-scale biomass production under particular environmental and climate conditions. In addition to fast growth rate and biomass productivity, the species ability to grow in wastewater must also be considered to increase the economic feasibility of microalgae for bioenergy purposes. Furthermore, the content of bioactive compounds in a strain must be taken into account to further increase the viability by integration of biorefinery concept. Chlorella spp. are among the most studied microalgal species. The present review attempts to unfold the potential of species of the genus Chlorella for bioenergy production integrating applicability for wastewater treatment and production of high added-value compounds. Several key features potentially make Chlorella spp. highly beneficial for bioenergy production. Fast growth rate, low nutritional requirements, low sensitivity to contamination, adaptation to fluctuating environments, ability to grow in photoautotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic conditions make Chlorella spp. highly useful for outdoor cultivation coupled with wastewater treatment. Chlorella is a source of multiple bioactive compounds. Most promising high-value products are chlorophylls, lutein, β-carotene and lipids. Here we demonstrate that although many Chlorella spp. show similar characteristics, some substantial differences in growth and response to environmental factors exist.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Treatment Protects Chlorella at Commercial Scale from the Predatory Bacterium Vampirovibrio Chlorellavorus
    fmicb-07-00848 June 17, 2016 Time: 15:28 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 20 June 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00848 A Novel Treatment Protects Chlorella at Commercial Scale from the Predatory Bacterium Vampirovibrio chlorellavorus Eneko Ganuza1*, Charles E. Sellers1, Braden W. Bennett2, Eric M. Lyons1 and Laura T. Carney2 1 Microbiology Group, Heliae Development, LLC, Gilbert, AZ, USA, 2 Molecular Ecology Group, Heliae Development, LLC, Gilbert, AZ, USA The predatory bacterium, Vampirovibrio chlorellavorus, can destroy a Chlorella culture in just a few days, rendering an otherwise robust algal crop into a discolored suspension of empty cell walls. Chlorella is used as a benchmark for open pond cultivation due to its fast growth. In nature, V. chlorellavorus plays an ecological role by controlling this widespread terrestrial and freshwater microalga, but it can have a devastating effect when it attacks large commercial ponds. We discovered that V. chlorellavorus was associated with the collapse of four pilot commercial-scale (130,000 L volume) open- Edited by: pond reactors. Routine microscopy revealed the distinctive pattern of V. chlorellavorus Yoav Bashan, The Bashan Institute of Science, USA attachment to the algal cells, followed by algal cell clumping, culture discoloration and Reviewed by: ultimately, growth decline. The “crash” of the algal culture coincided with increasing Kathleen Scott, proportions of 16s rRNA sequencing reads assigned to V. chlorellavorus. We designed University of South Florida, USA a qPCR assay to predict an impending culture crash and developed a novel treatment to Qiang Wang, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China control the bacterium. We found that (1) Chlorella growth was not affected by a 15 min *Correspondence: exposure to pH 3.5 in the presence of 0.5 g/L acetate, when titrated with hydrochloric Eneko Ganuza acid and (2) this treatment had a bactericidal effect on the culture (2-log decrease [email protected] in aerobic counts).
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Marine Phytoplankton, Picochlorum Maculatum in the Southeastern Coast of India
    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 46 (04), April 2017, pp. 791-796 First record of marine phytoplankton, Picochlorum maculatum in the Southeastern coast of India Dinesh Kumar, S1. S. Ananth1, P. Santhanam1*, K. Kaleshkumar2 & R. Rajaram2 1Marine Planktonology & Aquaculture Lab., 2DNA Barcoding and Marine Genomics Lab., Department of Marine Science, School of Marine Sciences, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli- 620 024, Tamil Nadu, India. * [E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]] Received 20 October 2014 ; revised 02 January 2015 The marine phytoplankton Picochlorum maculatum (Chlorophyta:Trebouxiophyceae) is recorded for the first time in the Southeastern coast of India. In this study, marine phytoplankton were collected at Muthukkuda mangrove waters, Tamil Nadu, Southeast coast of India which was then isolated, purified and identified with rDNA sequencing. Recurrence component analysis of marine phytoplankton P. maculatum indicated that the peptides were composed of Beta structure, comprising alpha-helix, extended strand and random coil. The number of amino acids and chemical properties from the marine microalgae P. maculatum are calculated and having composition of Neutral (82.69%), Acidic (10.72%) and Basic (6.57%) amino acids. This species may be introduced by way of shipping and other transport mechanisms where organisms are inadvertently moved out of their home range, e.g., ballast water exchange. [Keywords: Microalgae, Picochlorum maculatum, Genetic Distance, Open Reading Frame, Poly A signals] Introduction The genus Picochlorum maculatum was in Indian coastal waters. There are five Picochlorum established by Henley et. al.1 based on Nannochloris were reported in species level from Japan maculta Butcher, 1952. The currently accepted name (Picochlorum atomus, Picochlorum eukaryotum, P.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Project Peer Review
    Functional Characterization of Cellular Metabolism U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) 2019 Project Peer Review Advanced Algal Systems Scott Twary March 5, 2019 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Managed by Triad National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA LA-UR-19-20466 Goal Statement Goal Design an integrated strain improvement platform utilizing environmental, epigenetic, and genetic factors for targeted advances with rapid, comprehensive phenotyping leading to greater understanding of these modifications. Outcomes & Relevance Define the genetic pathway regulating nitrogen (N) sensing and signaling to produce an improved algae line with faster production due to rapid N assimilation and potentially uncouple N stress induction of lipid accumulation. Novel capability development • Integrated strain improvement strategy • Expanded suite of flow cytometry physiological assays • CRISPR/Cas genome engineering toolbox for Nannochloropsis salina • Epigenetic profiling and specific gene responses to environmental stress • EpiEffector modification and regulation of genome Los Alamos National Laboratory 3/05/19 | 2 Quad Chart Overview Barriers addressed Timeline: Ongoing Project Aft‐C. Biomass Genetics and • Current merit review period: Development: • October 1, 2017-September 30, 2020 • 33% complete Creation of novel integrated strain improvement methods and new tool applications. Total FY 17 FY 18 Total Costs Pre Costs Costs Planned Objective FY17** Funding (FY 19-Project To integrate flow cytometry, End Date) epigenome regulation, and genome engineering for elucidation of N DOE 2,200 K 650 K 1,100 K 1,334 K stress sensing and signaling and Funded application towards novel line improvement strategies Project Cost N/A End of Project Goal Share* An improved algae line with increased productivity over 30% of baseline.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoproterozoic Origin and Multiple Transitions to Macroscopic Growth in Green Seaweeds
    Neoproterozoic origin and multiple transitions to macroscopic growth in green seaweeds Andrea Del Cortonaa,b,c,d,1, Christopher J. Jacksone, François Bucchinib,c, Michiel Van Belb,c, Sofie D’hondta, f g h i,j,k e Pavel Skaloud , Charles F. Delwiche , Andrew H. Knoll , John A. Raven , Heroen Verbruggen , Klaas Vandepoeleb,c,d,1,2, Olivier De Clercka,1,2, and Frederik Leliaerta,l,1,2 aDepartment of Biology, Phycology Research Group, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; bDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium; cVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie Center for Plant Systems Biology, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium; dBioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium; eSchool of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; fDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, CZ-12800 Prague 2, Czech Republic; gDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; hDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; iDivision of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at the James Hutton Institute, Dundee DD2 5DA, United Kingdom; jSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, WA 6009, Australia; kClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW 2006, Australia; and lMeise Botanic Garden, 1860 Meise, Belgium Edited by Pamela S. Soltis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, and approved December 13, 2019 (received for review June 11, 2019) The Neoproterozoic Era records the transition from a largely clear interpretation of how many times and when green seaweeds bacterial to a predominantly eukaryotic phototrophic world, creat- emerged from unicellular ancestors (8). ing the foundation for the complex benthic ecosystems that have There is general consensus that an early split in the evolution sustained Metazoa from the Ediacaran Period onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Engineering of Green Microalgae for the Production of Biofuel and High Value Products
    GENETIC ENGINEERING OF GREEN MICROALGAE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF BIOFUEL AND HIGH VALUE PRODUCTS Joanna Beata Szaub Department of Structural and Molecular Biology University College London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2012 DECLARATION I, Joanna Beata Szaub confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: 1 ABSTRACT A major consideration in the exploitation of microalgae as biotechnology platforms is choosing robust, fast-growing strains that are amenable to genetic manipulation. The freshwater green alga Chlorella sorokiniana has been reported as one of the fastest growing and thermotolerant species, and studies in this thesis have confirmed strain UTEX1230 as the most productive strain of C. sorokiniana with doubling time under optimal growth conditions of less than three hours. Furthermore, the strain showed robust growth at elevated temperatures and salinities. In order to enhance the productivity of this strain, mutants with reduced biochemical and functional PSII antenna size were isolated. TAM4 was confirmed to have a truncated antenna and able to achieve higher cell density than WT, particularly in cultures under decreased irradiation. The possibility of genetic engineering this strain has been explored by developing molecular tools for both chloroplast and nuclear transformation. For chloroplast transformation, various regions of the organelle’s genome have been cloned and sequenced, and used in the construction of transformation vectors. However, no stable chloroplast transformant lines were obtained following microparticle bombardment. For nuclear transformation, cycloheximide-resistant mutants have been isolated and shown to possess specific missense mutations within the RPL41 gene.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateral Gene Transfer of Anion-Conducting Channelrhodopsins Between Green Algae and Giant Viruses
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.042127; this version posted April 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 5 Lateral gene transfer of anion-conducting channelrhodopsins between green algae and giant viruses Andrey Rozenberg 1,5, Johannes Oppermann 2,5, Jonas Wietek 2,3, Rodrigo Gaston Fernandez Lahore 2, Ruth-Anne Sandaa 4, Gunnar Bratbak 4, Peter Hegemann 2,6, and Oded 10 Béjà 1,6 1Faculty of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. 2Institute for Biology, Experimental Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, Berlin 10115, Germany. 3Present address: Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann 15 Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel. 4Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway. 5These authors contributed equally: Andrey Rozenberg, Johannes Oppermann. 6These authors jointly supervised this work: Peter Hegemann, Oded Béjà. e-mail: [email protected] ; [email protected] 20 ABSTRACT Channelrhodopsins (ChRs) are algal light-gated ion channels widely used as optogenetic tools for manipulating neuronal activity 1,2. Four ChR families are currently known. Green algal 3–5 and cryptophyte 6 cation-conducting ChRs (CCRs), cryptophyte anion-conducting ChRs (ACRs) 7, and the MerMAID ChRs 8. Here we 25 report the discovery of a new family of phylogenetically distinct ChRs encoded by marine giant viruses and acquired from their unicellular green algal prasinophyte hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoproterozoic Origin and Multiple Transitions to Macroscopic Growth in Green Seaweeds
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/668475; this version posted June 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Neoproterozoic origin and multiple transitions to macroscopic growth in green seaweeds Andrea Del Cortonaa,b,c,d,1, Christopher J. Jacksone, François Bucchinib,c, Michiel Van Belb,c, Sofie D’hondta, Pavel Škaloudf, Charles F. Delwicheg, Andrew H. Knollh, John A. Raveni,j,k, Heroen Verbruggene, Klaas Vandepoeleb,c,d,1,2, Olivier De Clercka,1,2 Frederik Leliaerta,l,1,2 aDepartment of Biology, Phycology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, 9000 Ghent, Belgium bDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium cVIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Technologiepark 71, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium dBioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium eSchool of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia fDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-12800 Prague 2, Czech Republic gDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA hDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA. iDivision of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at the James Hutton Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK jSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia (M048), 35 Stirling Highway, WA 6009, Australia kClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW 2006, Australia lMeise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] or [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Relative Rates of Molecular Evolution Between Freshwater and Marine Eukaryotes
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.13000 Do saline taxa evolve faster? Comparing relative rates of molecular evolution between freshwater and marine eukaryotes T. Fatima Mitterboeck,1,2,3 Alexander Y. Chen,1,2 Omar A. Zaheer,1,2 EddieY.T.Ma,1,2,4 and Sarah J. Adamowicz1,2 1Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada 2Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada 3E-mail: [email protected] 4School of Computer Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada Received June 8, 2015 Accepted June 28, 2016 The major branches of life diversified in the marine realm, and numerous taxa have since transitioned between marine and freshwaters. Previous studies have demonstrated higher rates of molecular evolution in crustaceans inhabiting continental saline habitats as compared with freshwaters, but it is unclear whether this trend is pervasive or whether it applies to the marine environment. We employ the phylogenetic comparative method to investigate relative molecular evolutionary rates between 148 pairs of marine or continental saline versus freshwater lineages representing disparate eukaryote groups, including bony fish, elasmobranchs, cetaceans, crustaceans, mollusks, annelids, algae, and other eukaryotes, using available protein-coding and noncoding genes. Overall, we observed no consistent pattern in nucleotide substitution rates linked to habitat across all genes and taxa. However, we observed some trends of higher evolutionary rates within protein-coding genes in freshwater taxa—the comparisons mainly involving bony fish—compared with their marine relatives. The results suggest no systematic differences in substitution rate between marine and freshwater organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositive 1
    1 Diversity and ecology of green microalgae in marine systems: 2 an overview based on 18S rRNA sequences 3 4 Margot Tragin1, Adriana Lopes dos Santos1, Richard Christen2, 3, Daniel Vaulot1* 5 1 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 7144, Station Biologique, Place 6 Georges Teissier, 29680 Roscoff, France 7 2 CNRS, UMR 7138, Systématique Adaptation Evolution, Parc Valrose, BP71. F06108 Nice 8 cedex 02, France 9 3 Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, UMR 7138, Systématique Adaptation Evolution, Parc 10 Valrose, BP71. F06108 Nice cedex 02, France 11 12 13 * corresponding author : [email protected] 14 Revised version : 28 March 2016 15 For Perspectives in Phycology 16 17 Tragin et al. - Marine Chlorophyta diversity and distribution - p. 2 18 Abstract 19 Green algae (Chlorophyta) are an important group of microalgae whose diversity and ecological 20 importance in marine systems has been little studied. In this review, we first present an overview of 21 Chlorophyta taxonomy and detail the most important groups from the marine environment. Then, using 22 public 18S rRNA Chlorophyta sequences from culture and natural samples retrieved from the annotated 23 Protist Ribosomal Reference (PR²) database, we illustrate the distribution of different green algal 24 lineages in the oceans. The largest group of sequences belongs to the class Mamiellophyceae and in 25 particular to the three genera Micromonas, Bathycoccus and Ostreococcus. These sequences originate 26 mostly from coastal regions. Other groups with a large number of sequences include the 27 Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Chlorodendrophyceae and Pyramimonadales. Some groups, such as 28 the undescribed prasinophytes clades VII and IX, are mostly composed of environmental sequences.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERSTANDING the GENOMIC BASIS of STRESS ADAPTATION in PICOCHLORUM GREEN ALGAE by FATIMA FOFLONKER a Dissertation Submitted To
    UNDERSTANDING THE GENOMIC BASIS OF STRESS ADAPTATION IN PICOCHLORUM GREEN ALGAE By FATIMA FOFLONKER A dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Microbial Biology Written under the direction of Debashish Bhattacharya And approved by _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey January 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Understanding the Genomic Basis of Stress Adaptation in Picochlorum Green Algae by FATIMA FOFLONKER Dissertation Director: Debashish Bhattacharya Gaining a better understanding of adaptive evolution has become increasingly important to predict the responses of important primary producers in the environment to climate-change driven environmental fluctuations. In my doctoral research, the genomes from four taxa of a naturally robust green algal lineage, Picochlorum (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiphycae) were sequenced to allow a comparative genomic and transcriptomic analysis. The over-arching goal of this work was to investigate environmental adaptations and the origin of haltolerance. Found in environments ranging from brackish estuaries to hypersaline terrestrial environments, this lineage is tolerant of a wide range of fluctuating salinities, light intensities, temperatures, and has a robust photosystem II. The small, reduced diploid genomes (13.4-15.1Mbp) of Picochlorum, indicative of genome specialization to extreme environments, has resulted in an interesting genomic organization, including the clustering of genes in the same biochemical pathway and coregulated genes. Coregulation of co-localized genes in “gene neighborhoods” is more prominent soon after exposure to salinity shock, suggesting a role in the rapid response to salinity stress in Picochlorum.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulgaris Vs Pyrenoidosa Englisch
    Publications By: Jörg Ullmann (Diplom-Biologe); 2006 The difference between Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorella pyrenoidosa On the position of the taxa “ Chlorella pyrenoidosa“ CHICK and Chlorella vulgaris BEIJERINCK within the Chlorophyta (green algae) The algae known as Chlorellaceae belong within the Chlorophyta (green algae) of the Trebouxiophyceae group. Chlorellaceae are in turn divided into two sister groups, the Parachlorella group and the Chlorella group to which Chlorella vulgaris belongs (Krienitz et al.; 2004). These are coccal green algae with small spherical green cells which is why Chlorella is sometimes described as “the green ball”. There are a wide variety of algae from various groups with the same appearance. This is known as convergent morphology (comparable to the convergent morphology of certain succulent euphorbias and cacti). In brief, Chlorella is difficult to distinguish and to classify and this remains the preserve of specialists. These are species which closely resemble one another in most characteristics and yet can vary considerably (morphologically and physiologically) in these characteristics. Naturally this makes determination and classification difficult, with the result that some have been classified wrongly or twice. More than 100 Chlorella species have been described, most of which have had to be revised. To distinguish the individual species from one another, various characteristics were (and are) examined: e.g. the ultrastructure of the cell wall, the ultrastructure of the pyrenoids, the chemical composition of the cell wall, serological cross-reactions, physiological, biochemical, morphological and molecular biological. In 1992 various pieces of evidence of algal cultures labelled as “ C.pyrenoidosa ” were examined. It was discovered from this that the algal cultures labelled as C.
    [Show full text]