DOCSLIB.ORG

Important Bird Areas Americas - Priority Sites for Biodiversity Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

© 2009 BirdLife International Juan de Dios Martínez Mera N35-76 y Av. Portugal Casilla 17-17-717 Quito, Ecuador. Tel: +593 2 2277059 Fax: +593 2 2469838 [email protected] www.birdlife.org BirdLife International is a UK-registered charity No. 1042125 ISBN: 978-9942-9959-0-2 Recommended citation: DEVENISH, C., DÍAZ FERNÁNDEZ, D. F., CLAY, R. P., DAVIDSON, I. & YÉPEZ ZABALA,I.EDS. (2009) Important Bird Areas Americas - Priority sites for biodiversity conservation. Quito, Ecuador: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series No. 16). To cite this chapter: BROWN, A., COLLIER, N., DEBROT, A., DEL NEVO, A. & WELLS, J. (2009) Dutch Caribbean. Pp 179 – 188 in C. Devenish, D. F. Díaz Fernández, R. P. Clay, I. Davidson & I. Yépez Zabala Eds. Important Bird Areas Americas - Priority sites for biodiversity conservation. Quito, Ecuador: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series No. 16). The purpose of the information contained in this book is to support conservation initiatives in the Americas, for which it may be reproduced. Using this information for commercial purposes is not permitted. If part or all of this information is used or included in any other publication, BirdLife International must be cited as copyright holder. Those who provided illustrations or photographs in this book have copyright over them and these are not permitted to be reproduced separately to the texts accompanying them. The presentation of material in this book and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Membership of BirdLife International does not imply any opinion or position with respect to sovereignty issues on the part of BirdLife International Partner organizations. Graphic design: Alejandro Miranda Baldares ([email protected]) Translations: Christian Devenish, Ítala Yépez Zabala & Amiro Pérez-Leroux Maps: David F. Díaz Fernández, Ítala Yépez Zabala & Christian Devenish Edition of Spanish language country chapters: Ítala Yépez Zabala, Carlos Huertas Sánchez & David F. Díaz Fernández Graphic design volunteer (Spanish language country chapters): Adriana Valencia Tapia 3ULQWHGLQ(FXDGRUE\3ROLJUi¿FD&$ This publication and all country/territory chapters in their native languages are available for download at www.birdlife.org/ 0TWVY[HU[)PYK(YLHZAMERICAS 1/ Ê , (KHT)YV^U5H[HSPH*VSSPLY(KVSWOL+LIYV[(KYPHU+LS5L]V 1LMM>LSSZ :HIHJVHZ[SPUL0)((5OHZ[OLOPNOLZ[U\TILYVMIYLLKPUN9LKIPSSLK;YVWPJIPYKZ 7OHL[OVUHL[OLYL\ZPUHU`0)(PU[OL(TLYPJHZ 7OV[V!)YLUKHHUK+\UJHU2PYRI` +\[JO*HYPIILHU ;LYYP[VY`MHJ[ZH[HNSHUJL 5VVM[LYYP[VYPLZ! 6 ;V[HSHYLH! RT2 ;V[HSWVW\SH[PVU! 5\TILYVM0)(Z! 23 ;V[HS0)(HYLH! OH 0)(JV]LYHNLVMSHUKHYLH! 28% .SVIHSS`[OYLH[LULKIPYKZ! 1 .SVIHSS`[OYLH[LULKIPYKZPU0)(Z! 1 *V\U[Y`LUKLTPJZ! .LULYHSPU[YVK\J[PVU The Dutch Caribbean is made up of the islands of Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles, all of which are part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, albeit with different political status1. Aruba, at 33 km long by 8-9 km wide, lies just off the Paraguaná peninsula on the north-west coast of Venezuela. The Netherlands Antilles is made up of two island groups; Bonaire and Curaçao off the coast of Venezuela, to the east of Aruba; and St Maarten, Saba and St Eustatius (or Statia) at the northern end of the Lesser Antillean chain, at more than 900 km from the three Dutch islands off the Venezuelan coast. St Maarten is part of the St-Martin/St Maarten island, divided into a northern, French half called St Martin and the southern, Dutch half of St Maarten. The Dutch and the French have shared the island – the smallest land mass in the world to be divided between two governments – for almost 350 years. Aruba and Curaçao are the most populous islands with over 100,000 inhabitants, whereas Saba and St Eustatius have less than 5,000 each (Table 1). Tourism is important in the economy of the whole of the Dutch Caribbean, DOWKRXJKRWKHUVLJQLÀFDQWLQGXVWULHVLQFOXGHWUDGHRLOUHÀQLQJDQGWUDQVIHUIDFLOLW\EDQNLQJDQGKDUERUUHODWHG services. ;HISL:\TTHY`PUMVYTH[PVUMVY[LYYP[VYPLZPU[OL+\[JO*HYPIILHU Territory (YLHRT2) 7VW\SH[PVU Capital (S[P[\KLT 5VVM0)(Z ;V[HS0)(HYLHOH 7LYJLU[HNLVM[V[HSSHUKHYLH Aruba 193 103,500 6YHUQLZ[HK 0–188 4 612 0.3% Bonaire 288 14,000 2YHSLUKPQR 0–240 6 23,830 53% Curaçao 444 138,000 >PSSLTZ[HK 0–375 5 16,280 25% Saba 13 1,420 ;OL)V[[VT 0–887 1 2,000 39% :[,\Z[H[P\Z 21 3,000 6YHUQLZ[HK 0–600 2 1,486 36% :[4HHY[LU 33 39,000 7OPSPWZI\YN 0–425 5 816 7.2% Aruba has its geological origins as a former part of South America, whereas the other islands are volcanic in origin. Mount Scenery on Saba is the highest point in the Dutch Caribbean at 887 m. Climate on Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao is similar; generally warm and very dry with an average annual precipi- tation of approximately 500 mm. Aruba is the driest of the three islands. Saba, St Eustatius and St Maarten have a slightly wetter climate, with between 1000 and 1700 mm of rain, much of which arrives during the hurricane season in late summer and fall. Vegetation is generally xeric shrubland with columnar cacti on the islands off Venezuela, with mangroves fring- ing some inland bays on Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao where there are also several enclosed shallow, hyper- saline lagoons providing important habitat for waterbirds. Dense secondary woodlands are recuperating from former agricultural impacts on Curaçao as a result of changes in agricultural activity. All islands except Saba have long sandy beaches, important for the growing tourist industry. The Lesser Antilles islands have vegetation FRQVLVWLQJRIWKRUQ\ZRRGODQGVFUXEDQGWUDQVLWLRQWRVHFRQGDU\UDLQIRUHVWDWPLGHOHYDWLRQVDQGHOÀQZRRG land in the highest mountainous regions. Coral reefs are present on all islands but have suffered some damage from hurricanes, anchoring vessels and other human activities. 1At some point in the near future the “Netherlands Antilles” will be dissolved. St Maarten and Curaçao will become separate countries within the Kingdom of the Netherlands (similar to the current status of Aruba). The islands of Bonaire, Saba and St Eustatius will be linked directly to the Netherlands as overseas territories. >HZOPUN[VU:SHNIHHP5H[PVUHS7HYR(> 7OV[V!9V^HU64HY[PU Provision for wildlife conservation differs within the Dutch Carib- bean. On Aruba, the main protected area is the 3400 ha Parke Nacional ¸(SPLUPU]HZP]LZWLJPLZHYLHZLYPV\Z Arikok. With no single government ministry responsible for environ- mental policy and implementation, wildlife conservation issues are not [OYLH[PU[OL+\[JO*HYPIILHULZWLJPHSS` GHDOW ZLWK LQ D FRRUGLQDWHG HIÀFLHQW ZD\ +RZHYHU DQ LVODQGZLGH VU:HIH:[,\Z[H[P\ZHUK:[4HHY[LU¹ Coastal Zone Management Plan is currently being developed and aims to identify areas of importance and those requiring protection and conservation. During a 2008 ‘Wild Aruba” conference there was a with tourism and recreational activities, posing a threat to seabird nesting consensus for the need of one environmental and management agency sites as well as leading to the loss of Aruba’s unique desert habitat. Alien for the island. invasive species are also a serious threat in the Dutch Caribbean, espe- cially on Saba, St Eustatius and St Maarten. Species of concern include In the Netherlands Antilles, conservation mechanisms are embraced rats, feral cats, goats, dogs and mice, in addition to raccoon (Procyon within the draft Island Nature Protection Ordinance which must be ap- lotor), mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus) and green monkey (Chloro- proved by each island’s government in order to facilitate the creation cebus sabaeus) on St Maarten. A related threat of overgrazing and direct RILVODQGVSHFLÀFFRQVHUYDWLRQOHJLVODWLRQ7KHSURFHVVLVFXUUHQWO\DW destruction of vegetation exists on St Eustatius and Bonaire, although on different stages on each island, with legislation in place and protected the former island, enforcement of an animal registry program has begun. areas designated on Bonaire, Curaçao and St Eustatius. Protected ar- Oil spills and inappropriate refuse management also pose threats, espe- eas have been proposed, but not approved, on Saba and St Maarten. cially to seabirds and other marine life on Statia. The capture and keep- 1HYHUWKHOHVVVRPHDUHDVEHQHÀWIURPDGHIDFWRFRQVHUYDWLRQPDQDJH- ing of parrots and other birds for pets is a particularly important threat ment to varying degrees (and government recognized in some cases) on Bonaire, especially with respect to the Yellow-shouldered Amazon at different sites in the Dutch Caribbean. Marine protected areas are (Amazona barbadensis). The intentional or accidental release of brown- also present on Bonaire, Saba, St Eustatius and a proposed area exists throated parakeets that had originated on Curacao or Bonaire poses a on St Maarten. On the whole, protected areas (both marine and ter- threat to the island subspecies of brown-throated parakeet on Aruba. restrial) are managed by local non-governmental organizations such as STINAPA on Bonaire, CARMABI Foundation on Curaçao, Saba Conservation Foundation, St Eustatius National Parks Foundation and the Nature Foundation of St Maarten. As well as the above organizations, a number of other NGOs have been established to address different environmental concerns, focusing on a variety of taxa and conservation issues. Activities carried out by NGOs include biodiversity inventories, species searches (e.g. Audubon’s Shear- water; 3XIÀQXV OKHUPLQLHUL),
Recommended publications
  • St. Eustatius (Statia)

    St. Eustatius (Statia)

    St. Eustatius (Statia) Overview: Sint Eustatius, also known as Statia, is one of the islands which make up the Netherlands Antilles. Over its long history, it changed hands more than 20 times. The island has remained in Dutch hands since 1816. Vocanic in origin, and quite rugged along the coastal areas, it was once one of the busiest and most powerful commercial ports in the Caribbean. As a result of the British blockade during America's Revolutionary War, most goods destined for the new colonies flowed into St. Eustatius. It was not uncommon to see hundreds of supply ships off Oranjestad. When that war ended and mail and supplies were sent directly to the new United States, the economy of St. Eustatius changed dramatically. According to tradition, it was the first foreign port to salute (1776) the American flag. Tourism is the major industry today, and the island is a favorite destination for scuba diving aficionados and nature lovers. Territory: Highest point = Mt. Mazinga, 1,968 ft. (602m) St. Eustatius is hilly with a central flat plain. Sandy beaches are rare. Geographically, the island is saddle- shaped, with the 602 meter-high Mount Mazinga, colloquially called the Quill (a dormant volcano) to the southeast and the smaller pair Signal Hill/Little Mountain and Boven Mountain to the northwest. The bulk of the island's population lives in the "dip" between the two areas, which crosses the center of the island. The island is just 5 miles long and 2 miles wide; area: 21 sq. km. Location: It is in the northern, Leeward Islands portion of the West Indies, some distance southeast of the Virgin Islands.
  • 'Good Governance' in the Dutch Caribbean

    'Good Governance' in the Dutch Caribbean

    Obstacles to ‘Good Governance’ in the Dutch Caribbean Colonial- and Postcolonial Development in Aruba and Sint Maarten Arxen A. Alders Master Thesis 2015 [email protected] Politics and Society in Historical Perspective Department of History Utrecht University University Supervisor: Dr. Auke Rijpma Internship (BZK/KR) Supervisor: Nol Hendriks Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 1. Background ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 From Colony to Autonomy ......................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Status Quaestionis .................................................................................................................... 11 Colonial history .............................................................................................................................. 12 Smallness ....................................................................................................................................... 16 2. Adapting Concepts to Context ................................................................................................. 19 2.1 Good Governance ..................................................................................................................... 19 Development in a Small Island Context ........................................................................................
  • Birdlife International for the Input of Analyses, Technical Information, Advice, Ideas, Research Papers, Peer Review and Comment

    Birdlife International for the Input of Analyses, Technical Information, Advice, Ideas, Research Papers, Peer Review and Comment

    UNEP/CMS/ScC16/Doc.10 Annex 2b CMS Scientific Council: Flyway Working Group Reviews Review 2: Review of Current Knowledge of Bird Flyways, Principal Knowledge Gaps and Conservation Priorities Compiled by: JEFF KIRBY Just Ecology Brookend House, Old Brookend, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, GL13 9SQ, U.K. June 2010 Acknowledgements I am grateful to colleagues at BirdLife International for the input of analyses, technical information, advice, ideas, research papers, peer review and comment. Thus, I extend my gratitude to my lead contact at the BirdLife Secretariat, Ali Stattersfield, and to Tris Allinson, Jonathan Barnard, Stuart Butchart, John Croxall, Mike Evans, Lincoln Fishpool, Richard Grimmett, Vicky Jones and Ian May. In addition, John Sherwell worked enthusiastically and efficiently to provide many key publications, at short notice, and I’m grateful to him for that. I also thank the authors of, and contributors to, Kirby et al. (2008) which was a major review of the status of migratory bird species and which laid the foundations for this work. Borja Heredia, from CMS, and Taej Mundkur, from Wetlands International, also provided much helpful advice and assistance, and were instrumental in steering the work. I wish to thank Tim Jones as well (the compiler of a parallel review of CMS instruments) for his advice, comment and technical inputs; and also Simon Delany of Wetlands International. Various members of the CMS Flyway Working Group, and other representatives from CMS, BirdLife and Wetlands International networks, responded to requests for advice and comment and for this I wish to thank: Olivier Biber, Joost Brouwer, Nicola Crockford, Carlo C. Custodio, Tim Dodman, Roger Jaensch, Jelena Kralj, Angus Middleton, Narelle Montgomery, Cristina Morales, Paul Kariuki Ndang'ang'a, Paul O’Neill, Herb Raffaele and David Stroud.
  • Ix Viii the World by Income

    Ix Viii the World by Income

    The world by income Classified according to World Bank estimates of 2016 GNI per capita (current US dollars,Atlas method) Low income (less than $1,005) Greenland (Den.) Lower middle income ($1,006–$3,955) Upper middle income ($3,956–$12,235) Faroe Russian Federation Iceland Islands High income (more than $12,235) (Den.) Finland Norway Sweden No data Canada Netherlands Estonia Isle of Man (U.K.) Russian Latvia Denmark Fed. Lithuania Ireland U.K. Germany Poland Belarus Belgium Channel Islands (U.K.) Ukraine Kazakhstan Mongolia Luxembourg France Moldova Switzerland Romania Uzbekistan Dem.People’s Liechtenstein Bulgaria Georgia Kyrgyz Rep.of Korea United States Azer- Rep. Spain Monaco Armenia Japan Portugal Greece baijan Turkmenistan Tajikistan Rep.of Andorra Turkey Korea Gibraltar (U.K.) Syrian China Malta Cyprus Arab Afghanistan Tunisia Lebanon Rep. Iraq Islamic Rep. Bermuda Morocco Israel of Iran (U.K.) West Bank and Gaza Jordan Bhutan Kuwait Pakistan Nepal Algeria Libya Arab Rep. Bahrain The Bahamas Western Saudi Qatar Cayman Is. (U.K.) of Egypt Bangladesh Sahara Arabia United Arab India Hong Kong, SAR Cuba Turks and Caicos Is. (U.K.) Emirates Myanmar Mexico Lao Macao, SAR Haiti Cabo Mauritania Oman P.D.R. N. Mariana Islands (U.S.) Belize Jamaica Verde Mali Niger Thailand Vietnam Guatemala Honduras Senegal Chad Sudan Eritrea Rep. of Guam (U.S.) Yemen El Salvador The Burkina Cambodia Philippines Marshall Nicaragua Gambia Faso Djibouti Federated States Islands Guinea Benin Costa Rica Guyana Guinea- Brunei of Micronesia Bissau Ghana Nigeria Central Ethiopia Sri R.B. de Suriname Côte South Darussalam Panama Venezuela Sierra d’Ivoire African Lanka French Guiana (Fr.) Cameroon Republic Sudan Somalia Palau Colombia Leone Togo Malaysia Liberia Maldives Equatorial Guinea Uganda São Tomé and Príncipe Rep.
  • The Value of Nature in the Caribbean Netherlands

    The Value of Nature in the Caribbean Netherlands

    The Economics of Ecosystems The value of nature and Biodiversity in the Caribbean Netherlands in the Caribbean Netherlands 2 Total Economic Value in the Caribbean Netherlands The value of nature in the Caribbean Netherlands The Challenge Healthy ecosystems such as the forests on the hillsides of the Quill on St Eustatius and Saba’s Mt Scenery or the corals reefs of Bonaire are critical to the society of the Caribbean Netherlands. In the last decades, various local and global developments have resulted in serious threats to these fragile ecosystems, thereby jeopardizing the foundations of the islands’ economies. To make well-founded decisions that protect the natural environment on these beautiful tropical islands against the looming threats, it is crucial to understand how nature contributes to the economy and wellbeing in the Caribbean Netherlands. This study aims to determine the economic value and the societal importance of the main ecosystem services provided by the natural capital of Bonaire, St Eustatius and Saba. The challenge of this project is to deliver insights that support decision-makers in the long-term management of the islands’ economies and natural environment. Overview Caribbean Netherlands The Caribbean Netherlands consist of three islands, Bonaire, St Eustatius and Saba all located in the Caribbean Sea. Since 2010 each island is part of the Netherlands as a public entity. Bonaire is the largest island with 16,000 permanent residents, while only 4,000 people live in St Eustatius and approximately 2,000 in Saba. The total population of the Caribbean Netherlands is 22,000. All three islands are surrounded by living coral reefs and therefore attract many divers and snorkelers.
  • Snapshot of American in the Caribbean, the Bahamas and Bermuda 01 Network

    Snapshot of American in the Caribbean, the Bahamas and Bermuda 01 Network

    Snapshot of American in the Caribbean, the Bahamas and Bermuda 01 Network American flies more than 170 daily flights to 38 destinations in the Caribbean, the Bahamas and Bermuda from seven U.S. hub airports, as well as from Boston (BOS) and Fort Lauderdale (FLL). Freeport, Bahamas (FPO) Year-round Seasonal Both Year-round: MIA Seasonal: CLT Marsh Harbour, Bahamas (MHH) Seasonal: CLT, MIA Bermuda (BDA) Year-round: JFK, PHL Eleuthera, Bahamas (ELH) Seasonal: CLT, MIA George Town/Exuma, Bahamas (GGT) Year-round: MIA Seasonal: CLT Santiago de Cuba (SCU) Year-round: MIA (Coming May 3, 2019) Providenciales, Turks & Caicos (PLS) Year-round: CLT, MIA Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic (POP) Year-round: MIA Santiago, Dominican Republic (STI) Year-round: MIA Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (SDQ) Nassau, Bahamas (NAS) Year-round: MIA Year-round: CLT, MIA, ORD Punta Cana, Dominican Republic (PUJ) Seasonal: DCA, DFW, LGA, PHL Year-round: BOS, CLT, DFW, MIA, ORD, PHL Seasonal: JFK Grand Cayman (GCM) Year-round: CLT, MIA San Juan, Puerto Rico (SJU) Year-round: CLT, MIA, ORD, PHL St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands (STT) Year-round: CLT, MIA, SJU Seasonal: JFK, PHL St. Croix, US Virgin Islands (STX) Havana, Cuba (HAV) Year-round: MIA Year-round: CLT, MIA Seasonal: CLT Holguin, Cuba (HOG) St. Maarten (SXM) Year-round: MIA Year-round: CLT, MIA, PHL Varadero, Cuba (VRA) Seasonal: JFK Year-round: MIA Cap-Haïtien, Haiti (CAP) St. Kitts (SKB) Santa Clara, Cuba (SNU) Year-round: MIA Year-round: MIA Year-round: MIA Seasonal: CLT, JFK Pointe-a-Pitre, Guadeloupe (PTP) Camagey, Cuba (CMW) Seasonal: MIA Antigua (ANU) Year-round: MIA Year-round: MIA Fort-de-France, Martinique (FDF) Year-round: MIA St.
  • Bonaire National Marine Park Netherlands

    Bonaire National Marine Park Netherlands

    UNITED NATIONS EP United Nations Original: ENGLISH Environment Program Proposed areas for inclusion in the SPAW list ANNOTATED FORMAT FOR PRESENTATION REPORT FOR: Bonaire National Marine Park Netherlands Date when making the proposal : October 5th, 2010 CRITERIA SATISFIED : Ecological criteria Cultural and socio-economic criteria Representativeness Cultural and traditional use Diversity Area name: Bonaire National Marine Park Country: Netherlands Contacts Last name: HOETJES First name: Paul Focal Point Position: Policy Coordinator Nature Email: [email protected] Phone: (+599) 715 83 08 Last name: De Leon First name: Ramón Manager Position: Park Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: + 599 717 8444 SUMMARY Chapter 1 - IDENTIFICATION Chapter 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Chapter 3 - SITE DESCRIPTION Chapter 4 - ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA Chapter 5 - CULTURAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CRITERIA Chapter 6 - MANAGEMENT Chapter 7 - MONITORING AND EVALUATION Chapter 8 - STAKEHOLDERS Chapter 9 - IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM Chapter 10 - OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION ANNEXED DOCUMENTS Chapter 1. IDENTIFICATION a - Country: Netherlands b - Name of the area: Bonaire National Marine Park c - Administrative region: Bonaire d - Date of establishment: 1/1/79 e - If different, date of legal declaration: not specified f - Geographic location Longitude X: -68.280058 Latitude Y: 12.134495 g - Size: 27 sq. km h - Contacts Contact adress: STINAPA Bonaire P.O. BOX 368, Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean Headquarter visitor's address: Barcadera z/n, Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean Website: www.bmp.org Email address: [email protected] i - Marine ecoregion 66. Southern Caribbean Comment, optional Chapter 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Present briefly the proposed area and its principal characteristics, and specify the objectives that motivated its creation : The Bonaire National Marine Park was first established in 1979.
  • St. Maarten – Netherlands Antilles)

    St. Maarten – Netherlands Antilles)

    The URBAN HERITAGE of PHILIPSBURG (St. Maarten – Netherlands Antilles) History of Foundation and Development & Report of Fieldwork by D. Lesterhuis & R. van Oers DELFT UNIVERSITY of TECHNOLOGY February 2001 Report in Commission of Dr. Shuji FUNO, Kyoto University - Japan O, sweet Saint Martin’s land, So bright by beach and strand, With sailors on the sea And harbours free. Where the chains of mountains green, Variously in sunlight sheen. O, I love thy paradise Nature-beauty fairily nice! O, I love thy paradise Nature-beauty fairily nice! Chorus of O Sweet Saint Martin’s Land, composed by G. Kemps in 1959. 2 Foreword Contents Within the Faculty of Architecture of Delft University of Technology the Department of Architectural Foreword Design/Restoration, chaired by Professor Dr. Frits van Voorden, has been conducting research into the characteristics, typologies and developments of Dutch overseas built heritage since the eighties Introduction of the last century. Traditional regions of study were the former colonies of the Netherlands. Because of close cultural-historic and political links and abundance in colonial architectural buildings and ensembles, an emphasis existed on the countries of Indonesia, Suriname, the Netherlands Chapter 1. General Overview and Short History Antilles and Sri Lanka. With the doctoral research of Van Oers, entitled Dutch Town Planning Overseas during VOC and • Dutch Presence in the West WIC Rule (1600-1800), the field of research of ‘mutual heritage’ was expanded to other regions • Principal Dutch Settlements in the West Indies: Willemstad & Philipsburg where the Dutch had been active in the planning and building of settlements. During that period new partnerships for co-operation in research were developed, of which the Graduate School of Engineering of Kyoto University in Japan is an important one.
  • The University of Chicago the Creole Archipelago

    The University of Chicago the Creole Archipelago

    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE CREOLE ARCHIPELAGO: COLONIZATION, EXPERIMENTATION, AND COMMUNITY IN THE SOUTHERN CARIBBEAN, C. 1700-1796 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY TESSA MURPHY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MARCH 2016 Table of Contents List of Tables …iii List of Maps …iv Dissertation Abstract …v Acknowledgements …x PART I Introduction …1 1. Creating the Creole Archipelago: The Settlement of the Southern Caribbean, 1650-1760...20 PART II 2. Colonizing the Caribbean Frontier, 1763-1773 …71 3. Accommodating Local Knowledge: Experimentations and Concessions in the Southern Caribbean …115 4. Recreating the Creole Archipelago …164 PART III 5. The American Revolution and the Resurgence of the Creole Archipelago, 1774-1785 …210 6. The French Revolution and the Demise of the Creole Archipelago …251 Epilogue …290 Appendix A: Lands Leased to Existing Inhabitants of Dominica …301 Appendix B: Lands Leased to Existing Inhabitants of St. Vincent …310 A Note on Sources …316 Bibliography …319 ii List of Tables 1.1: Respective Populations of France’s Windward Island Colonies, 1671 & 1700 …32 1.2: Respective Populations of Martinique, Grenada, St. Lucia, Dominica, and St. Vincent c.1730 …39 1.3: Change in Reported Population of Free People of Color in Martinique, 1732-1733 …46 1.4: Increase in Reported Populations of Dominica & St. Lucia, 1730-1745 …50 1.5: Enslaved Africans Reported as Disembarking in the Lesser Antilles, 1626-1762 …57 1.6: Enslaved Africans Reported as Disembarking in Jamaica & Saint-Domingue, 1526-1762 …58 2.1: Reported Populations of the Ceded Islands c.
  • Inter-American Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles Caribbean Netherlands Annual Report 2019

    Inter-American Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles Caribbean Netherlands Annual Report 2019

    Inter-American Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles Caribbean Netherlands Annual Report 2019 IAC Annual Report General Instructions Annex IV of the Convention text states that each Contracting Party shall hand in an Annual Report. To complete this Annual Report, Focal Points should consult with various stakeholders involved in sea turtle issues. If you have any questions regarding this Annual Report, please write to the Secretariat Pro Tempore at [email protected] Please note that the date to submit this Annual Report is April 30th, 2019. Part I (General Information) Please fill out the following tables. Add additional rows if necessary. a._ Focal Point Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Institution Quality of the Netherlands, National Office for Caribbean Netherlands Name Paul Hoetjes Date Annual Report submitted 30 April 2019 b._ Agency or Institution responsible for preparing this report Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Name of Agency or Institution Quality, National Office for the Caribbean Netherlands Name of the person responsible for Paul Hoetjes completing this report Address Kaya Gobernador Debrot 46 Telephone(s) +599 715 8308 Fax [email protected] E-mail Inter-American Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles Country Annual Report 2019 c ._ Others who participated in the preparation of this report Name Agency or Institution E-mail Mabel Nava Sea Turtle Conservation Bonaire [email protected] Jessica Berkel St. Eustatius National Parks [email protected] Foundation Part II (Policy and Management) a._ General description of activities carried out for the protection and conservation of sea turtles In accordance with Articles IX and XVIII of the text of the Convention, each Party shall establish monitoring programs, policies and plans for implementation at a national level for the protection and conservation of sea turtles and their habitat.
  • 2. Geophysics and the Structure of the Lesser Antilles Forearc1

    2. Geophysics and the Structure of the Lesser Antilles Forearc1

    2. GEOPHYSICS AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE LESSER ANTILLES FOREARC1 G. K. Westbrook, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham and A. Mascle and B. Biju-Duval, Institut Français du Pétrole2 ABSTRACT The Barbados Ridge complex lies east of the Lesser Antilles volcanic arc along the eastern margin of the Caribbean Plate. The complex dates in part from the Eocene, and elements of the arc system have been dated as Late Cretaceous and Late Jurassic, although most of the volcanic rocks date from the Tertiary, particularly the latter part. It is probable that the arc system was moved a considerable distance eastward with respect to North and South America during the Tertiary. The accretionary complex can be divided into zones running parallel to the arc, starting with a zone of initial accre- tion at the front of the complex where sediment is stripped from the ocean floor and the rate of deformation is greatest. This zone passes into one of stabilization where the deformation rate is generally lower, although there are localized zones of more active tectonics where the generally mildly deformed overlying blanket of sediment is significant dis- turbed. Supracomplex sedimentary basins that are locally very thick are developed in the southern part of the complex. The Barbados Ridge Uplift containing the island of Barbados lies at the western edge of the complex; between it and the volcanic arc lies a large forearc basin comprising the Tobago Trough and Lesser Antilles Trough. There are major longitudinal variations in the complex that are broadly related to the northward decrease in sedi- ment thickness away from terrigenous sources in South America and that are locally controlled by ridges in the oceanic igneous crust passing beneath the complex.
  • East Coast of Mexico – 2018

    East Coast of Mexico – 2018

    East Coast of Mexico – 2018 Höegh Autoliners is one of the world’s leading Ro/Ro operators, carrying close to two million standard car units annually worldwide. Höegh Autoliners has transportation contracts with many of the world’s vehicle manufacturers and is in addition a leading carrier of second-hand vehicles as well as high and heavy construction equipment and other rolling stock. Our Pure Car/Truck Carrier (PCTC) service to and from East Coast of Mexico is operated by one of the most modern and flexible Ro/Ro fleets in the market. East Coast of Mexico Service Cargo Höegh Autoliners offers import and export possibilities via our regular ports Höegh Autoliners has for many years built a strong relationship with leading on the East Coast of Mexico: Veracruz and Altamira. With growth in the area car manufacturers and importers, for whom we ship new vehicles in different we have added connections to and from Latin American and Caribbean trade patterns worldwide. In addition to that, we focus strongly on the High ports. and Heavy and Breakbulk segments, where our professional staff and modern vessels are ready to cater for a variety of cargo. We offer a wide network of connections with around 100 ports linked with Veracruz and Altamira. We connect the East Coast of Mexico with USA, Latin Our sophisticated Ro/Ro vessels offer up to 6.5 meters of free deck height America and Caribbean, Europe, Middle East, Africa, India, East Asia, and can cater for cargo weighing up to 375 tonnes. The vessels are able to Oceania and South East Asia.