DOCSLIB.ORG

DISTRICT of COLUMBIA HOME RULE ACT Public

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DISTRICT of COLUMBIA HOME RULE ACT Public DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOME RULE ACT Public Law 93-198; 87 Stat. 774 D.C. Official Code ' 1-201.01 et seq. Approved December 24, 1973 Prepared by Office of the General Counsel Council of the District of Columbia Suite 4 1350 Pennsylvania Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 724-8026 This document depicts the District of Columbia Home Rule Act as enacted by the Congress in December, 1973, and amended through July 18, 2012, the date of the last congressional amendment before the printing of this document. The text of the Act is in the original format as en- acted and amended. Where the Office of the General Counsel has added brief annotations to the text, those annotations appear in brackets. Provisions of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act that amend other acts are not included in this document except for those amendatory provisions found in Title IV (The District Charter). This document has been updated for printing on: January 14, 2014 November 12, 2013 July 5, 2013 January 7, 2013 February 18, 2010 July 17, 2009 November 3, 2008 June 6, 2007 April 1, 2005 July 7, 2004 October 5, 2001 January 28, 1999 February 24, 1998 2.11.14 This printing includes amendments made by: An Act To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to revise the timing of special elections for local office in the District of Columbia, approved July 18, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-145; 126 Stat. 1133). District of Columbia Chief Financial Officer Vacancy Act, approved May 1, 2013 (Pub. L. 113-8; 127 Stat. 441). The Local Budget Autonomy Amendment Act of 2012, effective July 25, 2013 (D.C. Law 19-321; 60 DCR 1724, 20 DCSTAT 1743). Title IV of the Board of Ethics and Government Accountability Establishment and Comprehensive Ethics Reform Amendment Act of 2011, effective July 31, 2013 (D.C. Law 19-124A; 60 DCR 12134; 20 DCSTAT 1741). An Act To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to clarify the rules regarding the determination of the compensation of the Chief Financial Officer of the District of Columbia, approved December 26, 2013 (Pub.L. 113-71; 127 Stat. 1209). COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Phil Mendelson, Chairman Yvette M. Alexander Jack Evans Marion Barry Jim Graham Anita Bonds David Grosso Muriel Bowser Kenyan McDuffie David A. Catania Vincent B. Orange, Sr. Mary M. Cheh Tommy Wells OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Under Whose Direction This Document Has Been Prepared V. David Zvenyach, General Counsel John Hoellen, Legislative Counsel Benjamin Bryant, Codification Counsel Katherine Westcott, Assistant General Counsel Melissa C. Tucker, Assistant General Counsel Manasi Venkatesh, Assistant General Counsel Rebecca Katz, Assistant General Counsel Rosalyn Steward, Assistant General Counsel Karen R. Barbour, Legislative Assistant Ada Arrington, Secretary 1.7.13 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE I - SHORT TITLE, PURPOSES, AND DEFINITIONS Sec. 101. Short Title.............................................................................................................1 Sec. 102. Statement of Purposes ..........................................................................................1 Sec. 103. Definitions ............................................................................................................1 TITLE II -- GOVERNMENTAL REORGANIZATION Sec. 201. Redevelopment Land Agency ..............................................................................2 Sec. 202. National Capital Housing Authority ....................................................................3 Sec. 203. National Capital Planning Commission and Municipal Planning [Amendment to another law].......................................3 Sec. 204. District of Columbia Manpower Administration .................................................3 TITLE III -- DISTRICT CHARTER PREAMBLE, LEGISLATIVEPOWER, AND CHARTER AMENDING PROCEDURE Sec. 301. District Charter Preamble .....................................................................................4 Sec. 302. Legislative Power .................................................................................................4 Sec. 303. Charter Amending Procedure ...............................................................................4 TITLE IV -- THE DISTRICT CHARTER PART A -- THE COUNCIL Subpart 1 -- Creation of the Council Sec. 401. Creation and Membership ....................................................................................5 Sec. 402. Qualifications for Holding Office ........................................................................7 Sec. 403. Compensation .......................................................................................................7 Sec. 404. Powers of the Council ..........................................................................................8 Subpart 2 -- Organization and Procedure of the Council Sec. 411. The Chairman .......................................................................................................9 Sec. 412. Acts, Resolutions, and Requirements for Quorum ...............................................9 Sec. 413. Investigations by the Council .............................................................................10 PART B -- THE MAYOR Sec. 421. Election, Qualifications, Vacancy, and Compensation ......................................10 Sec. 422. Powers and Duties ..............................................................................................11 Sec. 423. Municipal Planning ............................................................................................13 Sec. 424. Chief Financial Officer of the District of Columbia ..........................................14 i Sec. 424a. Authority of Chief Financial Officer over Personnel of Office and Other Financial Personnel ...............................................................................20 Sec. 424b. Procurement Authority of the Chief Financial Officer ....................................21 PART C -- THE JUDICIARY Sec. 431. Judicial Powers...................................................................................................22 Sec. 432. Removal, Suspension, and Involuntary Retirement ...........................................24 Sec. 433. Nomination and Appointment of Judges............................................................25 Sec. 434. District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission ....................................26 PART C-I – THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Se. 435. Election of the Attorney General......................................................................27 PART D -- DISTRICT BUDGET AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Subpart 1 -- Budget and Financial Management Sec. 441. Fiscal Year .........................................................................................................28 Sec. 442. Submission of Annual Budget ...........................................................................28 Sec. 443. Multiyear Plan ....................................................................................................29 Sec. 444. Multiyear Capital Improvement Plan .................................................................30 Sec. 445. District of Columbia Courts' Budget ..................................................................30 Sec. 445A. Water and Sewer Authority Budget ................................................................31 Sec. 446. Enactment of local budget by Council ...............................................................31 Sec. 446A. Permitting Increase in Amount Appropriated as Local Funds During a Fiscal Year ......................................................................................................................32 Sec. 446B. Acceptance of Grant Amounts Not Included in Annual Budget .....................32 Sec. 447. Consistency of Budget, Accounting, and Personnel Systems ............................33 Sec. 448. Financial Duties of the Mayor............................................................................34 Sec. 449. Accounting Supervision and Control .................................................................35 Sec. 450. General and Special Funds .................................................................................35 Sec. 450A. Reserve Funds .................................................................................................36 Sec. 450B. Comprehensive Financial Management ..........................................................38 Sec. 451. Special Rules Regarding Certain Contracts .......................................................39 Sec. 452. Annual Budget for the Board of Education [Repealed] .....................................40 Sec. 453. Reductions in Budgets of Independent Agencies ...............................................40 Subpart 2 -- Audit Sec. 455. District of Columbia Auditor .............................................................................41 Sec. 456. Performance and Financial Accountability ........................................................42 ii PART E -- BORROWING Subpart 1 -- Borrowing Sec. 461. District's Authority to Issue and Redeem General Obligation Bonds for Capital Projects ....................................................................................45 Sec. 462. Contents of Borrowing Legislation and Elections on Issuing General Obligation Bonds .......................................................................................45 Sec. 463. Publication of Borrowing Legislation ................................................................46 Sec. 464.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Can Home Rule in the District of Columbia Survive the Chadha Decision?
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 33 Issue 4 Summer 1984 Article 2 1984 Can Home Rule in the District of Columbia Survive the Chadha Decision? Bruce Comly French Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Bruce C. French, Can Home Rule in the District of Columbia Survive the Chadha Decision?, 33 Cath. U. L. Rev. 811 (1984). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol33/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CAN HOME RULE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SURVIVE THE CHADHA DECISION? Bruce Comly French* More than a decade has passed since the enactment of the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act (Home Rule Act).' In this Act, the Congress delegated much of its con- stitutional authority affecting the District of Columbia2 to an elected * Associate Professor of Law, Claude W. Pettit College of Law, Ohio Northern Uni- versity. Lecturer, Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America. B.A., The American University, 1969; M.A., The American University, 1970; J.D., Antioch College School of Law, 1975. The author was Legislative Counsel to the Council of the District of Columbia (1979-1983) and Staff Director and Counsel to the Committee on Government Operations, Council of the District of Columbia (1975-1978). The author recognizes and appreciates the assistance of M.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Code
    United States Code COMPREHENSIVE COVERAGE DATING BACK TO INCEPTION IN 1925-1926, IN A FULLY SEARCHABLE, USER-FRIENDLY FORMAT! The United States Code is a consolidation and codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States. The Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives prepares and publishes the United States Code pursuant to section 285b of title 2 of the Code. The Code does not include regulations issues by executive branch agencies, decisions of the Federal courts, treaties, or laws enacted by State or local governments. THE HEINONLINE ADVANTAGE HeinOnline’s version of the United States Code provides users with a single source for the entire archive along with current content of the United States Code. • Comprehensive coverage from inception • Browse by Title or Edition • Quickly find a document with the custom citation locator • Content is easy to both browse and search • Powerful search engine enables users to locate topic-specific content quickly and easily • As part of several Core packages, the U.S. Code in HeinOnline provides an incredible platform for an even better value! United States Code INCLUDES EARLY FEDERAL CODES & COMPILATIONS OF STATUTES The Early Federal Laws Collection represents the most complete collection of federal statute compilations, prior to the United States Code in 1926. The collection includes the first compilation by Richard Folwell (1795- 1814), the Bioren and Duane editions (1815), Thomas Herty Digest (1800), William Graydon’s Abridgement (1803), among others. Browse the laws by Title, Coverage, Publication Date, Volumes, Congress, or Compiler, using a custom chart of documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal
    Department of Homeland Security OMB No. 1615-0067; Expires 07/31/2022 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services U.S. Department of Justice I-589, Application for Asylum Executive Office for Immigration Review and for Withholding of Removal START HERE - Type or print in black ink. See the instructions for information about eligibility and how to complete and file this application. There is no filing fee for this application. NOTE: Check this box if you also want to apply for withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture. Part A.I. Information About You 1. Alien Registration Number(s) (A-Number) (if any) 2. U.S. Social Security Number (if any) 3. USCIS Online Account Number (if any) 4. Complete Last Name 5. First Name 6. Middle Name 7. What other names have you used (include maiden name and aliases)? 8. Residence in the U.S. (where you physically reside) Street Number and Name Apt. Number City State Zip Code Telephone Number ( ) 9. Mailing Address in the U.S. (if different than the address in Item Number 8) In Care Of (if applicable): Telephone Number ( ) Street Number and Name Apt. Number City State Zip Code 10. Gender: Male Female 11. Marital Status: Single Married Divorced Widowed 12. Date of Birth (mm/dd/yyyy) 13. City and Country of Birth 14. Present Nationality (Citizenship) 15. Nationality at Birth 16. Race, Ethnic, or Tribal Group 17. Religion 18. Check the box, a through c, that applies: a. I have never been in Immigration Court proceedings. b. I am now in Immigration Court proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Comparison of Non-Sovereign Island Territories: the Search for ‘True Equality’
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 43-66 A global comparison of non-sovereign island territories: the search for ‘true equality’ Malcom Ferdinand CNRS, Paris, France [email protected] Gert Oostindie KITLV, the Netherlands Leiden University, the Netherlands [email protected] (corresponding author) Wouter Veenendaal KITLV, the Netherlands Leiden University, the Netherlands [email protected] Abstract: For a great majority of former colonies, the outcome of decolonization was independence. Yet scattered across the globe, remnants of former colonial empires are still non-sovereign as part of larger metropolitan states. There is little drive for independence in these territories, virtually all of which are small island nations, also known as sub-national island jurisdictions (SNIJs). Why do so many former colonial territories choose to remain non-sovereign? In this paper we attempt to answer this question by conducting a global comparative study of non-sovereign jurisdictions. We start off by analyzing their present economic, social and political conditions, after which we assess local levels of (dis)content with the contemporary political status, and their articulation in postcolonial politics. We find that levels of discontent and frustration covary with the particular demographic, socio- economic and historical-cultural conditions of individual territories. While significant independence movements can be observed in only two or three jurisdictions, in virtually all cases there is profound dissatisfaction and frustration with the contemporary non-sovereign arrangement and its outcomes. Instead of achieving independence, the territories’ real struggle nowadays is for obtaining ‘true equality’ with the metropolis, as well as recognition of their distinct cultural identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Reorganization Plan Authority” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 59, folder “Reorganization Plan Authority” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 59 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library Monday 3/10/75 7:10 Warren Hendrlcks would like you to take a look at this memo dated 2 /18 from Nichols to Jerry Jonea re extension of Presidential Reorganization Plan authority. I have attached a copy of Mr. Areeda's signoff of 2/21. Apparently nothing has been done and he feels you may not be aware of this • • Monday 3/10/75 7:10 Warren Hendricks would like you to take a look at this memo dated 2 /18 from Nichols to Jerry Jones re extension of Presidential Reorganization Plan authority. I have attached a copy of Mr. Areeda1 s signoff of 2/21. Apparently nothing has been done and he feels you may not be aware of this • • • • , , , ~ A .J...J .n l.J u ::, .L 7 .r\CilO.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Black Caucus Meeting, 1974/08/21 (2)” of the Robert T
    The original documents are located in Box 10, folder “Congressional Black Caucus Meeting, 1974/08/21 (2)” of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 10 of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 20, 197 4 MEMORANDUM FOR: ROBERT HARTMANN JOHN MARSH ALEXANDER HAIG WILLIAM TIMMONS KEN COLE ;() FROM: STAN SCOT~ SUBJECT: President's Briefing Book for Meeting with Congressional Black Caucus -- August 21 Please submit your comment, if any, by c. o. b. Tuesday, August 20. Thanks very much for your help. Attachment ~.., 0 Illg. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 21, 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: THE PRESIDENT FROM: STAN SCOTT SUBJECT: President's Briefing Book for Meeting with the Black Caucus August 21 In my view, the single most important concern in the upcoming meeting is to avoid the President's seeming to approach the subject of black and low income interests from a defensive posture.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-614—Nov
    98 STAT. 3192 PUBLIC LAW 98-614—NOV. 8, 1984 Public Law 98-•614 98th Congress An Act Nov. 8, 1984 To extend and revise the authority of the President under chapter 9 of title 5, United States Code, to transmit to the Congress plans for the reorganization of the [H.R. 1314] agencies of the executive branch of the Government, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Reorganization United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may Act be cited as the "Reorganization Act Amendments of 1984". Amendments of 1984. 5 use 901 note. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY SEC. 2. (a) Subsection (b) of section 905 of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: "(b) A provision contained in a reorganization plan may take effect only if the plan is transmitted to Congress (in accordance with section 903(b)) on or before Decem­ ber 31,1984.". (b) Paragraph (1) of section 908 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking out "described by section 909 of this title" and inserting in lieu thereof "with respect to any reorganization plans transmitted to Congress (in accordance with section 903(b) of this chapter) on or before December 31,1984". METHOD OF TAKING EFFECT SEC. 3. (a) Section 906 of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking out subsection (a) and inserting in lieu thereof the following: President of U.S. "(a) Except as provided under subsection (c) of this section, a reorganization plan shall be effective upon approval by the Presi­ dent of a resolution (as defined in section 909) with respect to such plan, if such resolution is passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate, within the first period of 90 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after the date on which the plan is transmitted to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Home Rule Question
    Réussir l’agrégation d’anglais The Home Rule The Home Rule Question (1870-1914) Pauline Collombier-Lakeman Collombier-Lakeman Pauline Question Home Rule became a significant issue from the 1870s across the British Isles. Aspirations to limited legislative autonomy were notably strong in Ireland, where a Home Rule party progressively emerged and played a major role both on the island and at Westminster. While the question of Irish Home Rule came to dominate discussions, the quest for self- (1870-1914) government was not limited to Ireland but soon spread to other parts of the United Kingdom. In Scotland and Wales, Home Rule movements were also formed with their (1870-1914) own specific objectives. This led to exchanges on the idea of “home rule all round”. On Pauline Collombier-Lakeman a broader scale, Home Rule spurred cross-imperial solidarities and raised the question of the future of the British Empire and the possibility of an “imperial federation”. And although it aroused keen interest and support across Britain and the rest of the Empire, it also provoked intense opposition in the shape of loyalism or unionism. In doing so, Home Rule reshaped British politics along new lines. Pauline Collombier-Lakeman is a Senior Lecturer in British Studies at the university of Strasbourg. After studying at the ENS Fontenay-Saint- Cloud and passing the Agrégation, she was awarded her PhD from the Université Paris 3 – Sorbonne Nouvelle in 2007. Her research work has been focusing on Irish parliamentary nationalism and the relationship between Irish Home Rulers and the British Empire. CET OUVRAGE EST LE FRUIT D’UNE ÉTROITE COOPÉRATION ENTRE BELIN ÉDUCATION ET LE CENTRE NATIONAL D’ENSEIGNEMENT À DISTANCE, ÉTABLISSEMENT PUBLIC QUI DISPENSE Question The Home Rule DES FORMATIONS DE TOUS NIVEAUX À PLUS DE 320 000 INSCRITS RÉPARTIS DANS LE JO MONDE ENTIER.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Capitol Grounds Demonstration Area
    M A 625 S SQUARE SA POSTAL CH USE 753 567 TT S A VE 720 NU 626 E N .W . U RED LINE NION STATI F STREET N.W . ON F STREET N.E. NORTH CAPITOLSTREET N721 JUDICIARY BUILDING FEDERAL PARKING FIRST ST.N.W. 680 754 LOT 11 628 569 627 S721 PARKING LOT 12 E STREET N.E. E STREET N.W . 722 N W681 23 E W M ASS A THIRD STREETN.E. J CH E U R SE S T 630 T E681 S E A Y V 755 571 629 PARKING E LOT 16 NU A E 6 V N. E E 723 . N U 5 E 682 N. W. D STREET N.W . L D STREET N.E. D STREET N.E. O U I S D I W632 A E N SECOND STREETN.E. L A PARKING LOT18 A FIRST STREETN.E. PARKING LOT19 631 A W V MEMORIAL CHESTNUT E BUILDING 7 A N GIBSON 573 4 724 U R ENEY 756 683 E E CAPITOL POLICE N A . CO W HQ V . E632 E 684 N UNITED STATESCAPITOL GROUNDS U E IN D N I BENCH ANA . AVE E BENCH NUE . N. V C STREET N.E. W H C N E C STREET N.W . B C STREET N.E. POOL FOUNTAIN GRATE OFFICE BUILDING OFFICE BUILDING OFFICE BUILDING OFFICE BUILDING DEMONSTRATION AREAS MAP RUSSELL SENATE RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING ROBERT TAFT DIRKSEN SENATE DIRKSEN SENATE MEMORIAL UPPER SENATE E633 HART SENATE M 757 A 574 V R V V Y 685 634 L 686 PARK A 725 N ROBERT TAFT D 2 MEMORIAL A V V V E N U W633 E N .
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin & Devolution of Local Revenue Authority
    WCM129 guts.qk4 5/7/03 11:15 AM Page 20 The Origin & Devolution of Local Revenue Authority by Michael Coleman and Michael G. Colantuono s the population grows, new technology develops, the economy evolves, But local governments in California do not have adequate control of their new needs and priorities rise and old ones fade. The varied circumstances finances and local affairs. Over the last half-century — and especially since the that arise from these factors, over time and among different localities, are an essential adoption of Proposition 13 in 1978 — reason that control of municipal affairs and finance has always been a paramount con- California cities and counties have lost substantial control of their major fiscal cern of local governments. To respond efficiently and effectively to the needs of their resources to fund police and other law enforcement services, fire protection, customers, cities need the flexibility to change their services; they need control of their parks, libraries, schools, hospitals and public health. finances so revenues will cover costs and so they may reallocate resources to meet Today, California’s city budgets face changing priorities. greater risk and less stability, both eco- nomically and politically, than in the past. City revenues often don’t grow commensurately with service needs, which forces increases in taxes or fees or cuts in services. Moreover, unfunded Michael Coleman is principal of Coleman Advisory Services and fiscal consultant to the League. He mandates from state and federal govern- is the owner of CaliforniaCityFinance.com, an information resource on California local government ments and new judicial interpretations finance.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE Organization Act in U.S.C..Pdf
    42 U.S.C. United States Code, 2014 Edition Title 42 - THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 84 - DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Sec. 7101 - Definitions From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov §7101. Definitions (a) As used in this chapter, unless otherwise provided or indicated by the context, the term the "Department" means the Department of Energy or any component thereof, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (b) As used in this chapter (1) reference to "function" includes reference to any duty, obligation, power, authority, responsibility, right, privilege, and activity, or the plural thereof, as the case may be; and (2) reference to "perform", when used in relation to functions, includes the undertaking, fulfillment, or execution of any duty or obligation; and the exercise of power, authority, rights, and privileges. (c) As used in this chapter, "Federal lease" means an agreement which, for any consideration, including but not limited to, bonuses, rents, or royalties conferred and covenants to be observed, authorizes a person to explore for, or develop, or produce (or to do any or all of these) oil and gas, coal, oil shale, tar sands, and geothermal resources on lands or interests in lands under Federal jurisdiction. (Pub. L. 95–91, §2, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 567.) REFERENCES IN TEXT This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a), (b), and (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–91, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 565, as amended, known as the Department of Energy Organization Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out below and Tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 106-405 106Th Congress An
    PUBLIC LAW 106-405—NOV. 1, 2000 114 STAT. 1751 Public Law 106-405 106th Congress An Act To promote the development of the commercial space transportation industry, to authorize appropriations for the Office of the Associate Administrator for Commer­ Nov. 1, 2000 cial Space Transportation, to authorize appropriations for the Office of Space ~iH.R. 2607] Commerciahzation, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Commercial Space SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Transportation Competitiveness This Act may be cited as the "Commercial Space Transportation Act of 2000. Competitiveness Act of 2000". 49 use 70101 note. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 49 use 70101 note. The Congress finds that— (1) a robust United States space transportation industry is vital to the Nation's economic well-being and national secu­ rity; (2) enactment of a 5-year extension of the excess third party claims pajonent provision of chapter 701 of title 49, United States Code (Commercial Space Launch Activities), will have a beneficial impact on the international competitiveness of the United States space transportation industry; (3) space transportation may evolve into airplane-style operations; (4) during the next 3 years the Federal Government and the private sector should analyze the liability risk-sharing regime to determine its appropriateness and effectiveness, and, if needed, develop and propose a new regime to Congress at least 2 years prior to the expiration of the extension contained in
    [Show full text]