Cortes Forestry General Partnership Community Forest K4G
Forest Stewardship Plan
Draft October 2019
Plan Preparer
I certify that the work described herein fulfills the standards expected of a member of the Association of British Columbia Forest Professionals and that I did personally complete the work covered in this Plan.
______Ione M. Brown, RPF Date Hecate Integrated Resources Ltd
Authorized Licensee
______Kevin Peacey, Co-Chair Date Cortes Forestry GP
______Aaron Ellingson, Co-Chair Date Cortes Forestry GP
[ii]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Definitions Used within the FSP ...... vi
FOREST STEWARDSHIP PLAN ...... 1
1. Introduction ...... 1
2. Application of the FSP (FRPA S.3(4)) ...... 1
Licensees and Licences ...... 1
Areas Subject to Cutting Permit or Road Permit ...... 2
Term of the FSP (FRPA S.6(1)) ...... 2
Commencement of Term of the FSP (FRPA S.6(1)(b)) ...... 2
3. Map (FRPA Section 5(1)(a) and FPPR S.14) ...... 2
4. Designation and Objectives in Effect under FPPR S.14 ...... 5
5. Grandparented Designations – (FRPA S. 181) ...... 5
Results and Strategies (FRPA S.5(1)(b) ...... 6
6. Objectives Resulting from Higher Level Plans FRPA S.5(1)(b)(ii) ...... 7
Vancouver Island Land Use Plan-Higher Level Plan (HLP) Order ...... 7
Order Establishing Provincial Non-Spatial Old-Growth Objectives ...... 7
Order Establishing Old Growth Management Areas ...... 7
7. Objectives Prescribed under FRPA Section 149 ...... 8
Soil Resources (FPPR s.5) ...... 8
Timber Resources (FPPR S.6) ...... 8
Wildlife Resources (FPPR Section 7, uWR and Species at Risk) ...... 8
Water Quality, Fish, Wildlife and Biodiversity in Riparian Areas (FPPR S.8) ...... 11
Fish Habitat in Fisheries Sensitive Watersheds (FPPR s.8.1) ...... 12
[iii]
Water in Community Watersheds (FPPR s.8.2) ...... 12
Wildlife and Biodiveristy Resources – Landscape Level (FPPR S.9) ...... 13
Objective for Wildlife and Biodiversity Resources – Stand Level (FPPR s.9.1) ...... 13
8. Visual Quality Objectives (FPPR S.9.2) ...... 14
9. Objectives for Cultural Heritage Resources (FPPR S.10) ...... 14
10. Measures to Prevent the Introduction and Spread of Invasive plants ...... 15
11. Measures Related to Natural Range Barriers ...... 16
12. Stocking Standards ...... 17
Appendices ...... 21
List of Appendices:
Appendix A Mapping Appendix B Stocking Standards Appendix C Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Appendix D Cortes Landscape Unit Plan Appendix E Order Establishing Objectives for Old Growth Management Areas (Sunshine Coast) Appendix F Section 7 Wildlife Notices Appendix G Invasive Plants Appendix H Referrals and Correspondence
[iv]
This page is intentionally left blank
[v]
ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND DEFINITIONS USED WITHIN THE FSP
CFA means community forest agreement
FDU(s) means forest development unit(s)
FPPR means the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation under FRPA
FRPA means the Forest and Range Practices Act
FSP means Forest Stewardship Plan
Free Growing Stand means a stand of healthy trees of a commercially valuable species, the growth of which is not impeded by competition from plants
GAR means the Government Action Regulation under FRPA
GMZ Under the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan, describes a General Management Zone
HLP means – Higher Level Plan with established objectives by government
IWMS means Identified Wildlife Management Strategy as defined in version 2004
LUP means landscape unit plan: Higher Level Plan with established objectives
Net area to be reforested means the area specified in a silviculture site plan which is scheduled for basic reforestation (net area of block only)
OGMA(s) means old growth management area(s)
Primary Forest Activity As defined in FPPR Section 1(1) means one or more of a) timber harvesting, b) silviculture treatments, or c) road construction, maintenance and deactivation
[vi]
Qualified Person means a person who by experience and/or education is considered knowledgeable and able to provide advice on a given subject in a given situation
Qualified Professional means a person who by education, experience and professional credentials is considered knowledgeable and able to provide expert advice on a given subject in a given situation and is licensed or regulated by a governing body or association
RMZ means riparian management zone where activities are prescribed in order to protect the adjacent stream
RMA means riparian management area where defined practices are carried out to protect stream banks or RRZ
RRZ means riparian reserve zone where trees are retained to maintain stream integrity, unless an exemption is provided for a specific circumstance or situation that must be provided for by a Qualified Professional
UWR Ungulate Winter Range: identified habitats for critical winter survival of ungulates (deer and/or elk)
VILUP means the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan (Higher Level Plan)
WHA means Wildlife Habitat Area that has been formally designated through GAR or grandparented for a particular wildlife species of concern for a region
WTRA means wildlife tree retention areas
[vii]
FOREST STEWARDSHIP PLAN
1. INTRODUCTION
The Cortes Forestry General Partnership (CFGP) holds a Community Forest Agreement K4G that was awarded in August 2013 by the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development (MFLNRORD). This entity is an equal partnership between the Klahoose Forestry No 2 Limited Partnership (KF2LP) and the Cortes Community Forest Cooperative (CCFC) who are tasked with managing the 3,862 hectares of Crown land on Cortes Island.
The ‘Vision’, ‘Mission Statement’, ‘Values’, and ‘Governing Principles’ of forest management at Community Forest Licence K4G are clearly outlined on the website http://www.cortesforestrypartnership.com/ and within the Community Forest Operating Plan (CFOP) which is found on the website and may be updated periodically (current v.2014).
2. APPLICATION OF THE FSP (FRPA S.3(4))
The holder has prepared this Forest Stewardship Plan (FSP) as required under s.3(4) of the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA), in order to carry out and plan primary forest activities within Forest Development Units (FDUs). Reference to the legislation within this FSP refers to any legislation as it was on the date of submission of this FSP.
The FSP contains the following components:
1. Map illustrating the FDU within which primary forest activities may occur, and 2. Results and/or Strategies to address objectives set by government or through Higher Level Plans
LICENSEES AND LICENCES
This FSP applies to the Holder of Community Forest Agreement K4G, the Cortes Forestry General Partnership.
1
AREAS SUBJECT TO CUTTING PERMIT OR ROAD PERMIT
Cutting Permits and Road Permits in effect as of the date of submission of this FSP are not part of the review for this FSP.
TERM OF THE FSP (FRPA S.6(1))
The term of this FSP will be for five years. The FSP may be terminated earlier if the licensee(s) elects to replace it with another approved FSP, or the FSP may be extended pursuant to the FRPA and its regulations.
COMMENCEMENT OF TERM OF THE FSP (FRPA S.6(1)(B))
The term of this FSP commences on the date specified by the Minister or his Delegated Decision Maker (DDM).
3. MAP (FRPA SECTION 5(1)(A) AND FPPR S.14)
The FSP Map shows the areas that are within the boundary of the FDU that may be available for primary forest activities and also those areas that are within the boundary of the FDU but are not part of the FSP.
As per s.14(3) of the Forest and Range Practices Act (FPPR), the FSP describes the elements that have been identified and in effect as of the Date of Submission of this FSP and where those elements are applicable to this FSP. These elements are shown on the FSP mapping where applicable, as follows (not all of the following occur in the areas under this FSP):
Ungulate winter range, Wildlife habitat area, Fisheries sensitive watershed, Lakeshore management zone, including specifying the width of the zone, if the zone is identified on a map accompanying the establishment of the lakeshore management zone, Scenic area, Lake identified as an L1 lake under section 49 (1) (b) (ii) if the lake has been identified on a map accompanying the identification, Community watershed, Old growth management area,
2
Parks and protected areas Recreation sites and trails Special Resource Management Zones (Vancouver Island Land Use Plan) Area in which commercial timber harvesting is prohibited by another enactment,
Additional elements may also be shown on the FSP mapping and are identified on the map legend for reference.
3
Figure 1: Forest Stewardship Plan Area Overview Map
4
4. DESIGNATION AND OBJECTIVES IN EFFECT UNDER FPPR S.14
The following land use designation, objectives and notices apply to the FSP. Details are found in the appendices of this plan:
Vancouver Island Land Use Plan ‐ Order (October 24, 2000) Cortes Landscape Unit Plan (2012) Order Establishing OGMAs for the Sunshine Coast District ((2012) Species at Risk Notice – Sunshine Coast Forest District – (Dec 2004 rev Mar 2006) K4G Cutting Permit ZZ (not included as a document in this FSP)
5. GRANDPARENTED DESIGNATIONS – (FRPA S. 181)
Under s. 180 and 181 of FRPA the following designations are grandparented and shown on the FSP mapping in the appendices.
Recreation Sites
No other grandparented designations, objectives or measures are found within the areas under this FSP.
5
RESULTS AND STRATEGIES (FRPA S.5(1)(B)
Objectives Set by Government are outlined in s.149 (1) of FRPA. In addition the area is subject to grandparented objectives that result from previous executive orders as they relate to the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan. As per s.5(1)(b) of the FRPA, a FSP must specify intended results or strategies, each in relation to (i) objectives set by government and (ii) other objectives that are established under the Act or the regulations and that pertain to all or part of the area subject to the plan.
The FSP holder has set out results and/or strategies to meet all objectives that are required for areas under this FSP. Results and strategies are written to meet the following standards:
Results are written to be measurable or verifiable outcomes in respect of each particular objective, and describe the situation or circumstance where the outcomes will be applied. Strategies are written to be measurable or verifiable steps or practices that will be carried out in respect of each particular objective, and the situation or circumstance where the steps or practices will be applied.
As per s.5(2)(b) of FRPA, a FSP must also be consistent with timber harvesting rights granted by the government for Community Forest Agreement area for K4G.
Applicable Areas
The FSP covers the tenure area of Community Forest K4G, which falls within one Forest Development Unit (FDU 1).
All of the results and strategies in this FSP apply to FDU 1.
6
6. OBJECTIVES RESULTING FROM HIGHER LEVEL PLANS FRPA S.5(1)(B)(II)
VANCOUVER ISLAND LAND USE PLAN‐HIGHER LEVEL PLAN (HLP) ORDER
The objectives set by government for land use designation were defined by the established order identified in Appendix C in this document. The Vancouver Island Land Use Plan (VILUP) took effect in October 2000, which has established land use objectives for Special Management Zones and Resource Management Zones (Enhanced Forestry Zones) within the VILUP area. The Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Summary document (2000) is used as background information for establishing the importance of certain values in the area and including this information into the planning for development in areas under this FSP.
Results, Strategies or Measures
Although the FDU falls within the VILUP area, there are no objectives within the HLP itself that apply to the FSP. No results or strategies are required to meet the objectives within the HLP.
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROVINCIAL NON‐SPATIAL OLD‐GROWTH OBJECTIVES
The Non‐Spatial Old Growth Order (NSOGO) was signed by the Minister of Sustainable Resource Management (note previous Ministry name) and took effect June 30, 2004. This order applies to areas under this FSP and supplements FPPR Section 9.
Results, Strategies or Measures
The NSOGO has been replaced by the Old Growth Management Areas Order (Appendix E) for the Cortes Landscape Unit. The FSP holder has developed results and/or strategies to meet the OGMA Order which can be found in the section for OGMAs below.
No further results, strategies or measures are required to meet the objectives of the NSOGO.
ORDER ESTABLISHING OLD GROWTH MANAGEMENT AREAS
Old Growth Management Areas (OGMAs) within the Cortes Landscape Unit have been established by Order of the Minister July 10, 2012
Strategy
The FSP holder(s) will comply with the applicable objectives of the legal order for OGMAs within the Cortes Landscape Unit.
7
7. OBJECTIVES PRESCRIBED UNDER FRPA SECTION 149
SOIL RESOURCES (FPPR S.5)
The objective set by government for soils is, without unduly reducing the supply of timber from British Columbia’s forests, to conserve the productivity and hydrologic function of soils.
Strategy
The FSP holder will comply with the objectives set by government for soils (FPPR s.5).
The default limits (practice requirements) for soil disturbance and for permanent access structures as per s.35 and s.36 of the FPPR will apply and no result and/or strategy is required for these sections.
TIMBER RESOURCES (FPPR S.6)
The objectives set by government for timber are to:
a) Maintain or enhance an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from British Columbia’s forests, b) Ensure that delivered wood costs, generally, after taking into account the effect on them of the relevant provisions of this Regulation and of the Act, are competitive in relation to equivalent costs, in relation to regulated primary forest activities in other jurisdictions, and c) Ensure that the provisions of this Regulation and of the Act that pertain to primary forest activities do not unduly constrain the ability of a holder of an agreement under the Forest Act to exercise the holder’s rights under the agreement.
Result and/or Strategy
The FSP holder is exempt from the requirement to develop a result or strategy to meet this objective, therefore no result or strategy is required.
WILDLIFE RESOURCES (FPPR SECTION 7, UWR AND SPECIES AT RISK)
1. The objective set by government for wildlife is, without unduly reducing the supply of timber from British Columbia’s forests, to conserve sufficient wildlife habitat in terms of amount of area, distribution of area and attributes of those areas, for
(a) the survival of the species at risk; (b) the survival of regionally important wildlife; and
8
(c) the winter survival of specified ungulate species. 2. A person required to prepare a forest stewardship plan must spec i f y a re s u l t or strategy in respect of the objective stated under subsection (1) only if the Minister of Environment (MFLNRORD), or a designated official, notifies the person of the applicable, (a) species referred to in subsection 1), and (b) indicators of the amount, distribution and attributes of wildlife habitat described in subsection (1).
Strategy
The FSP holder will comply with the objectives set by government for wildlife.
Where an area is identified by the FSP holder as having populations of species at risk but does not have the attributes listed within the Notice, the FSP holder will incorporate the recommendations provided by a Qualified Professional into plans for conserving wildlife habitat consistent with the s.7 Notices. The FSP holder will conserve and track the amount, distribution and attributes of wildlife habitat in a manner consistent with the Notice.
Orders Establishing Ungulate Winter Range
There are no established Ungulate Winter Range areas established in areas under this FSP. Should such areas become established at a future date, the FSP holder will amend this strategy accordingly.
Orders Establishing Wildlife Habitat Areas
There are currently no approved Wildlife Habitat Areas (WHAs) in areas under this FSP. However there are proposed WHAs within the Sunshine Coast Natural Resource District for Northern Goshawk (MFLNRORD letter May 28, 2019). Upon approval of these proposed WHAs, persons required to prepare a FSP will be exempted from the obligation to prepare results or strategies for Northern Goshawk to meet the s.7(2) Notices, in the mature THLB in the Sunshine Coast Natural Resource District. None of these proposed WHAs fall within areas under this FSP.
Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus)
An inventory identifying Marbled Murrelet habitat suitability has been conducted by Regional Biologists covering areas on Cortes Island (and surrounding areas). The results of these surveys have been incorporated into support information for the FSP.
Wildlife Habitat Areas have not yet been established for Marbled Murrelet for areas within the FSP boundary. Further habitat for Marbled Murrelet is also proposed for establishment
9
in WHAs and the majority of this habitat overlaps with existing legal OGMAs and parks and protected areas both within and adjacent to the FSP area.
Strategy
The FSP holder will conduct primary forest activities in areas under this FSP to be consistent with the objectives set by government for wildlife under s.7 of the FPPR, and the Notice authorized under s.7(2) of the FPPR “Indicators of the Amount, Distribution and Attributes of Wildlife Habitat Required for the Survival of Species at Risk in the Sunshine Coast Forest District”.
If primary forest activities are proposed for areas where suitable habitat has been identified through habitat surveys, in the non‐contributing land base, the harvested area will be replaced with suitable habitat within the contributing land base (THLB) as it has been defined during the TSR II analyses. Any exchanges will be tracked by the FSP holder and a notice sent to MFLNRORD.
Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos)
Grizzly bears are not found (typically) in areas under this FSP, therefore the s.7(2) Wildlife Notice for this species does not apply to the FDUs under this Plan.
No result or strategy is required.
Coastal Tailed Frog (Ascaphus truei)
Coastal Tailed frogs are not found within areas under this FSP, therefore the s.7(2) Wildlife Notice for this species does not apply to the FDUs under this Plan.
No result or strategy is required.
Vananda Creek Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus species 16 and 17)
Vananda Creek Sticklebacks are not known to be found within areas under this FSP, therefore the s.7(2) Wildlife Notice for this species does not apply to the FDUs under this Plan.
No result or strategy is required.
10
Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis laingi)
The Goshawk is on the Red List in British Columbia.
Strategy
Where an area has been identified by the FSP holder as having populations of species at risk, or where an active nest has been found, these areas will be managed on a site‐specific basis consistent with the recommendations of a Qualified Professional.
WATER QUALITY, FISH, WILDLIFE AND BIODIVERSITY IN RIPARIAN AREAS (FPPR S.8)
The objective set by government for water, fish, wildlife and biodiversity within riparian areas is, without unduly reducing the supply of timber from British Columbia’s forests, to conserve, at the landscape level, the water quality, fish habitat, wildlife habitat and biodiversity associated with those riparian areas.
Result
The FSP holder(s) will comply with the requirements listed in the FPPR for s.47 (Stream Riparian Class), s.48 (Wetland Riparian Class), s.49 (Lake Riparian Class), s.50 (restrictions in a riparian management area), s.51 (restrictions in a riparian reserve zone), s.52(2) (restrictions in a riparian management zone), and s.53 (Temperature Sensitive Stream), where these requirements apply to areas under the FSP.
Strategies
1. Trees will be retained as required within the RMA of all streams, wetlands and lakes necessary for the protection of wildlife habitat and biodiversity values. 2. The FSP holder(s) will retain a Qualified Professional to determine the retention levels necessary at the site level to meet the objectives set by government for water, fish, wildlife and biodiversity within riparian areas, at the landscape level. The Qualified Professional will: a) consider the factors listed in FPPR Schedule 1 s.2 to determine the type of management regime on a site specific basis, and b) design riparian retention to be consistent with s.52(2) of the FPPR.
3. The FSP holder will conduct activities in the riparian management area that incorporate the recommendations made by the Qualified Professional and will minimize sediment and coarse woody debris inputs into streams to the extent practicable.
11
4. Riparian Reserve Zones will be assessed by a Qualified Professional for wind throw risk. Recommendations by the Qualified Professional will be incorporated into site level planning which may include carrying out treatments to lessen the potential impact to stream banks, streams and fish habitat from windthrow, as per s.51(1) of the FPPR.
FISH HABITAT IN FISHERIES SENSITIVE WATERSHEDS (FPPR S.8.1)
There are no “fisheries sensitive watersheds” established under sections 180(f) and 180(g) of FRPA for the area under this FSP.
In the event that Fisheries Sensitive Watersheds are established during the term of this FSP, the FSP holder will comply with the objectives set in s.8.1 of the FPPR.
WATER IN COMMUNITY WATERSHEDS (FPPR S.8.2) 1. “Community watershed” means a community watershed
(a) that is continued under section 180(e) of the FRPA, and
(b) for which a water quality objective has not been
(i) continued under section 181 of the FRPA, or
(ii) established under the Government actions Regulation.
2. The objective set by government for water being diverted for human consumption though a licensed waterworks in a community watershed is to prevent to the extent described in subsection (3) the cumulative hydrological effects of primary forest activities within the community watershed from resulting in
(a) a material adverse impact on the quantity of water or the timing of the flow of the water from the waterworks, or
(b) the water from the waterworks having a material adverse impact on human health that cannot be addressed by water treatment required under
(i) an enactment, or
(ii) the licence pertaining to the waterworks.
3. The objective set by government under subsection (2) applies only to the extent that it does not unduly reduce the supply of timber from British Columbia’s forests
12
Result and/or Strategy
There are no Community Watersheds within areas under this FDP, therefore no result or strategy is required.
In the event that a Community Watershed is established during the term of this FSP, the FSP holder will comply with the objectives set in s.8.2 of the FPPR.
WILDLIFE AND BIODIVERISTY RESOURCES – LANDSCAPE LEVEL (FPPR S.9)
The objective set by government for wildlife and biodiversity at the landscape level is, without unduly reducing the supply of timber from British Columbia’s forests and to the extent practicable, to design areas in which timber harvesting is to be carried out that resemble, both spatially and temporally, the patterns of natural disturbance that occur within the landscape.
Results
The FSP holder will comply with the maximum cutblock size as per FPPR s.64 and the adjacency requirements as per FPPR s.65.
OBJECTIVE FOR WILDLIFE AND BIODIVERSITY RESOURCES – STAND LEVEL (FPPR S.9.1)
The objective set by government for wildlife and biodiversity at the stand level is, without unduly reducing the supply of timber from British Columbia’s forests, to retain wildlife trees.
Results
The FSP holder will comply with the establishment of wildlife tree retention areas as per FPPR s.66 and s.67.
13
8. VISUAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES (FPPR S.9.2)
The objectives set by government under the Government Action Regulations (B.C. Reg. 582/2004), s.7(2) and s.17.
Scenic Area
Areas of the FSP are found within a Scenic Area due to the proximity of popular boating channels touring around the island and towards Desolation Sound. The visual landscape inventory polygons identified in this area include Retention (R) and Partial Retention (PR) polygons.
Strategy
The FSP holder will ensure that primary forest activities that fall within the Visual Landscape Reserve polygons are designed so that alteration falls within the allowable alteration limits from significant public viewpoints, and meets the Visual Quality Objectives, as described in FPPR s.1(1).
9. OBJECTIVES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES (FPPR S.10)
The objective set by government for cultural heritage resources is to conserve, or, if necessary, protect cultural heritage resources that are:
a) The focus of a traditional use by an aboriginal people that is of continuing importance to that people, and b) Not regulated under the Heritage Conservation Act.
Strategies
The FSP holder will comply with the objective set by government for cultural heritage resources using the following means:
1. Wherever possible, the FSP holder will minimize or eliminate any potential impact on cultural heritage resources that are of value or relative importance to aboriginal peoples, as determined by the affected First Nations, or a combination of Qualified Professionals and the Delegated Decision‐Maker.
2. The FSP holder will engage regularly with the First Nations and will review materials made known through Ministry sources, or through local First Nation sources including any archaeological overview studies, traditional use mapping, or other materials to
14
ensure avoidance of traditional use areas when planning for primary harvest activities.
3. Through planning and development of areas, the FSP holder will document and map any evidence of cultural use and, where requested, will conduct surveys for culturally modified trees or other cultural resources.
4. Cedar is recognized as a cultural resource and opportunities for continued traditional use by First Nations will be provided for through the planting of cedar on ecologically suitable sites and through the protection of cedar as recruitment for future cultural use in retention for riparian areas, wildlife habitat and old‐growth management areas.
5. The FSP holder hosts regular public meetings on Cortes for all residents, including First Nations’ members and licensee representatives, where operational updated and early stage planning information is provided for anyone who may be affected by these plans. Additional meetings are welcome and will be arranged upon request.
10. MEASURES TO PREVENT THE INTRODUCTION AND SPREAD OF INVASIVE PLANTS
As per s.47 of the FRPA, the FSP holder must carry out measures specified in a FSP to prevent the introduction or spread of prescribed species of invasive plants. Appendix G lists those plants that are invasive under the Invasive Plants Regulation.
Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) is not indicated in the Invasive Plants Regulation but this is also an introduced species which can aggressively spread. For both Himalayan Blackberry and Scotch Broom, the most effective method of control is prompt and successful reforestation of cutblocks with ecologically suitable species.
The FSP holder will carry out the following measures to prevent the introduction or spread of prescribed species of invasive plants:
Ensure that areas of exposed soils > 0.1 hectare are re‐vegetated with seedlings or with a grass seed, as prescribed by a Qualified Professional, within one year of harvest completion,
Promote awareness and recognition of invasive plant species to staff, contractors and sub‐contractors, and
o Ensure that road building and harvesting contractors inspect vehicles and equipment, particularly tracks and undercarriage when being transported to
15
and from Cortes Island, for the presence of plant parts, and that equipment be cleaned prior to leaving (or arriving to) areas that are known to contain invasive species.
Where the risk of spread of invasive plants, as identified by a Qualified Professional, is deemed to be low, areas >0.1 ha may be left to naturally regenerate with native species
Report new occurrences of Species of Concern (noted species of concern are Scotch Broom, varieties of Hogweed and all varieties of Knotweed) to the Coastal Invasive Plant Committee by filling in the “Invasive Alien Plant Program” (IAPP) or using the Report‐A‐ Weed application for android and IOS devices. Staff and contractors will be provided training regarding the use of Report‐A‐Weed
Where vegetation is identified as a Priority Species, the FSP holder will take site specific measures to control the spread and/or eliminate the plant as required using the Prevent, Eradicate, Contain or Control measures for Coastal Areas as found in Appendix G
11. MEASURES RELATED TO NATURAL RANGE BARRIERS
As per FPPR s.18, the FSP holder(s) must carry out measures specified in a FSP to mitigate the removal or ineffectiveness of a range barrier caused, directly or indirectly, through carrying out a forest practice. There are no known range resources within the area of this plan, therefore no measures are provided to meet the objectives.
16
12. STOCKING STANDARDS
General
FPPR Section 16: FPPR Section 44(1) applies in all situations and circumstances under this FSP and in all FDUs, where a free growing stand is required to be established under FRPA Section 29.
The regeneration date, stocking standards, free growing heights and species as per FPPR s 44(1)(a) and (b) are outlined in Appendix B.
FRPA Section197 election for stocking standards
EVEN AGED MANAGEMENT
The stocking standards in Appendix B apply to harvest units and/or standards units where even aged management is practiced, specifically those stands where Basal Area retention is <8 m2/ha. The standards are based on ecologically suitable species for each site and will be documented by the prescribing Forester in each Site Plan.
INTERMEDIATE CUTTING STANDARDS
The FSP holder is exempt from the requirements of sections 29 (1) of the FRPA if the holder harvests timber for the reasons referred to under FPPR section 44(3)(h). The FSP holder will ensure that, for a period of 12 to 24 months after completion of harvest, the area on which the timber harvesting was carried out conforms to the stocking standards specified in FPPR section 16(4) for the area (Appendix B, Table 1).
Stands suitable for an Intermediate Cut harvest will be >1.0 ha with no openings that are >0.1 ha in size and will be fully stocked with ecologically suitable species.
SINGLE ENTRY DISPERSED RETENTION SYSTEM STOCKING STANDARDS (SEDRSS)
The application of the SEDRSS as a silvicultural system will be used as a tool to meet those specific objectives outlined by the FSP holder in the Community Forest Management Objectives (CFGP), as appropriate for the areas under the FSP. Management strategies reflect the strong community philosophy for sustainable, responsible management of the Community Forest including the retention of healthy dominant trees in each stand and ensuring an abundance of older age classes to improve the overall ecological function and diversity of the forest. Use of SEDRSS will be restricted to specific situations and circumstances that are suitable for this partial cut harvest method.
17
The criteria for suitable stands include the following:
1) Conifer second‐growth stands only, this application is not suitable for broadleaf stands and will not be applied to Old Growth stands in areas under this FSP, 2) Dispersed retention residual basal area ranging from 5 – 39 m2/ha and the contiguous opening size is > 1.0 ha, and 3) Stands that have moderate to higher productivity.
The objectives for areas where SEDRSS is applied will be identified and outlined on a site specific basis and documented in each Site Plan by the prescribing Forester prior to harvesting.
The specific standards for SEDRSS are found in Appendix B, Tables 2 and 3. Survey procedures will follow the recommended methodologies outlined in the SEDRSS Framework Implementation Guide (Coastal), 2014.
Climate Change
The primary forest activities of the FSP holder will take place in lower elevation areas of the Coastal Western Hemlock dry and very dry maritime areas. There has been a substantial level of harvesting over the years over these areas resulting in the majority of the forests being moderately productive Douglas‐fir, western hemlock and western redcedar second‐ growth stands with patches of Old Growth scattered throughout.
The MFLNRORD produced an update to the “Reference Guide for Forest Development Stocking Standards” (revised March 2019) in response to climate change projections showing a possible shift in tree species and ecological suitability for reforestation on certain sites.
At this time, there are no recommended changes to species selection in the Biogeoclimatic Zones (subzones/variants) that are located within areas under this FSP. The FSP holder(s) will continue to monitor the recommended stocking standards and species suitability for areas where primary forest activities are conducted and amend the Stocking Standards in Appendix B as these become necessary.
Forest Health Factors
All stems considered to be crop trees will meet or exceed the Free Growing Damage Criteria as outlined in the Single Entry Dispersed Retention Stocking Standard (2014) Damage Criteria for Managed Stands in Coastal British Columbia (Section 1.4).
18
SPRUCE WEEVIL
Risk of Spruce Weevil is low for most of the plan area. If spruce is chosen as an ecologically suitable species for planting, then only resistant stock will be used and as a minor contributor to the overall stocking of the NAR.
DWARF MISTLETOE
Dwarf Mistletoe is found in stands with western hemlock within areas under this FSP. If hemlock is to be considered a crop tree (preferred or acceptable) during surveys, it will not be accepted as a well‐spaced tree within 10 metres of the drip line where a qualified surveyor has determined there is a risk of infection of regenerating seedlings. Ecologically suitable species other than hemlock will be planted in areas where mistletoe occurs in the overstory or adjacent stand.
BALSAM WOOLY APHID
The Balsam Woolly Aphid feeds on balsam (Abies grandis) and can cause mortality in older second growth trees. There are areas near to Cortes Island that have had known infestations, but due to the relatively minor population of balsam on Cortes, the risk of a large infestation would be considered lower. Monitoring for this insect can be done through aerial surveys and communication with adjacent licensees and government to follow areas of spread. Planting with species other than balsam lessens the risk additionally.
WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST
Any reforestation of white pine must be with rust‐resistant stock or the regenerating seedlings would not be included as contributing to the crop trees. Natural white pine regeneration can be accepted if seedlings are pruned to remove lower branches to a height of 3 metres.
ROOT DISEASES
Root rot diseases do occur throughout areas under the FSP but fairly infrequently and are generally restricted to small pockets. Both Phellinus and Armillaria can occur in these areas. As long as the pockets are small and the area can be replanted with a less susceptible species such as Cw, Pw or Dr, no further treatments will normally be required. If cases become larger and more concentrated, then further treatments such as de‐stumping may become necessary to reduce the impact. Root rot will be monitored and documented on a site level basis when found.
19
See Appendix B under this FSP for specific footnotes related to ecologically suitable species and forest health notes.
20
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Forest Stewardship Plan Mapping
Forest Development Unit 1:
Cortes Forestry General Partnership Community Forest K4G
FDU 1 covers a portion of the Cortes Landscape Unit
Map is attached following
IR 10 TATPO-OOSE DL 1042IR 10 TATPO-OOSE
DL 767 Cortes Community DL 287 Forest General Partnership DL 1043 FSP Map DL 19
DL 363 Legend
DL 1025 Community Forest Boundary (Forest Development Unit #1) Areas under Cutting Permit Completed DL 382
CFGP (coincides with the K4G boundary)
0 0 1 Park - Protected Area DL 361 DL 1018 DL 1019 DL 1020 DL 333 DL 334 Private Managed Forest Lands
OGMA - Legal 200 DL 312 DL 302 DL 1017 W E Recreation Reserve
3 S 0 DL 1021 0 T VQOs DL 339 DL 20 DL 309 Modification DL 335 DL 453
0 Partial Retention
0
1
0
0 1 Retention DL 1022 R DL 362 E DL 435 Roads Under RP D
O Stream DL 182A Bk A 200 N
DL 162 DL 1023 Read D Index Contour A DL 1008 Recreation Trail Bk B 30 0 1 Island 0 2 0 0 0
1
0
0 DL 21 I DL 1010 S
DL 277 L A DL 1024 DL 301 N
DL 1656 DL 4335 D 0 250 500 1,000 1,500
DL 1011 Meters DL 1012 DL 340 1:20,000 ³
Mapped By: Map Date: 7-Oct-2019 100 DL 1016 DL 780 DL 470 TEAKERNE ARM PARK
DL 1695 DL 1195 3 00
DL 5637 DL 1196 IR 6 QUEQUA DL 5638 1 0 IR 6 QUEQUA DL 1015 DL 781 0 DL 7077
DL 7239 DL 1627 Penn DL 7078 Bk A DL 1029 DL 782 DL 7076 DL 1628 Islands DL 1489 DL 1197 DL 7680 Bk BBk A DL 465 DL 1528 DL 1198 Cliff
DL 161 DL 161 Peak DL 7240 4 0 DL 7079 DL 783 DL 1199 0
3 2 0 0 HA'THAYIM MARINE PARK 0 0
1 DL 160 DL 160 0 0
DL 909 DL 1203 DL 7244 DL 7080 DL 784 DL 159 DL 159 3 0 Bk A 0 DL 7243 DL 747 L e Bk B DL 158 w
i s DL 8046 DL 6923 1 DL 7241 DL 1587 00 1 DL 390 C 0 0 DL 469 DL 1168 h DL 4967 DL 337 Hill a
1 0 DL 338 Island 0 n D DL 1169 n N l A DL 746 e 2 0 e L 0 n l S I n 1 0 1 0 DL 746A DL 1007 a 00 h DL 373 DL 373 200 C DL 1200 W l Bk A DL 1636 2 Bk B 0 E i DL 494 DL 904 0 DL 1004 t DL 1380, BULLS EYE MC DL 1200 1 u DL 703 00 S DL 701 DL 1626 DL 903 Bk I S T DL 468 Bk H 0 0 DL 418 1 DL 785 DL 1381, ARROW MC DL 745 DL 1179 Sec 49 1 DL 1542 Bk G Bk A 0
0
DL 4945 DL 4944
0 0 Bk F 1 Bk E R DL 902 DL 372
DL 672 DL 1170 E DL 4943
DL 1201 D
1 0 0 O 0 0 DL 459 1 N Bk C
D DL 4942 Private Managed Lands A IR 8 SQUIRREL COVE IR 8 SQUIRREL COVE DL 899 Private Managed Lands DL 905 DL 898 DL 503 Carrington Bay Regional Park DL 906 DL 1729
DL 897 200 DL 884 Sec 46 DL 1202 Sec 45 DL 117 Junction Point 10 I DL 901 DL 900 0 DL 871 DL 870 S Coulter Bk A Private Managed Lands DL 744 L Island Bk A DL 851 Sec 47 DL 907 A
Sec 48 DL 869 N DL 865 DL 866 DL 867 DL 868 DL 827 D DL 438 DL 1219 DL 4176 DL 908 DL 4973 DL 437 DL 1728 DL 3207, SEAGULL MC 2 00 0 DL 828 0 1 Bk B
1 0 Private Managed Lands DL 3202, BUCKING MULE MC DL 1537 0 DL 1534 DL 3203, BALLARAT MC
00 1 DL 4946 IR 7 TORK IR 7 TORK DL 6351 Camp Island Sec 36 Sec 37 Bk A Sec 38 DL 3204, SUNLIGHT MC DL 5591 Sec 39 Sec 40 0 DL 308 10 DL 3206, GREYHOUND MC Sec 41 Sec 41 Private Managed Lands DL 7195 DL 896 DL 4936 L 1, Pl 31556 DL 5984 L A, Pl VIP80226 DL 3205, BULLDOG MC Bk A DL 3569 DL 310
Private Managed Lands 2 Squirrel Cove 00 DL 308
200 DL 1205 DL 1206 DL 1689DL 1427 DL 436 Green DL 863 Sec 35A Mtn. Sec 35 DL 391 DL 1208 DL 1207 DL 4938 DL 504 DL 4937
DL 861 0
DL 458 Sec 34 0 DL 1705 2 Sec 30 DL 862 Sec 33 DL 1209 DL 1210 DL 8044 Sec 32 Private Managed Lands Sec 31 2 DL 1510 0 0 Private Managed Lands Bk A
2
0
0 DL 1212 DL 1211
2 L 1, Pl 2245 Private Managed Lands 0 0
LAR 2 DL 4968 L 1, Pl 26303 LAR 1 Sec 29 Whaletown LAR 1 SQ 5 LAR 1 LAR 4 LAR 5 Sec 20 L 1, Pl 2176 LAR 1LAR 1 LAR 3 Sec 22 DL 492 100 Sq 2 Sec 23 DL 739 DL 493 DL 860 DL 1723 La DL 1000 rse SQ 4 DL 461 n's DL 295 100 DL 517 Meadow
200
200 Ring Is. Sec 21 DL 823 DL 824 DL 519 SQ 3 Sec 24 SQ 1 Bk A DL 457 Frog Sec 26 Tan Island D e s o l a t i o n S o u n d Mountain 1 0
Sec 25 0
0 0
Sec 22 1 DL 1571 0 0 t DL 1720 Sec 23 3 DL 859 pi S k r DL 1540Bk A Sec 19 Sec 19 Sec 22 ha Sec 22 S DL 479 DL 4940 DL 1540 DL 1373 Bk B 0 Sec 18 10 DL 1540 Sec 19 Bk C
0 0 Sec 18 2 100 DL 858
Sec 17 100 100 Kinghorn 100 Bk B DL 857 DL 4939 Bk B Sec 16 Sec 15 DL 7628 Sec 14 Island Bk A DL 786 DL 460 Bk A DL 825 DL 1126 1 0 0
0 0 1 1 0 Marina Island Bk A 0 2 Cat Island 00 Easter DL 1127 DL 462 DL 400 Bluff DL 399
Bk B DL 1521 0 0 Wolf 1 Kitten Is. Bluff
DL 11 0 0 DL 401 1
DL 689 Sec 9 Sec 11 Kw'as Regional Park DL 787 Sec 12
DL 64 Sec 10 0 MANSONS LANDING PARK 10 Bk A
DL 402 DL 1512
Bk A DL 1683 Bk ADL 1717 Sec 8 Sec 9 DL 463 0 0 1 DL 1688 L 1, Pl 8912 DL 1681 DL 3784 DL 407 DL 307 L 1, Pl 8912 Red Granite Point MALASPINA PARK
DL 831
Bk A Sec 7 Mary Point Malaspina Sec 5 DL 3783
Sec 5A Cod Rocks Peninsula
Sec 6
DL 1548 DL 3782 DL 1730 IR 3 PAUKEANUM
h c a e B DL 3781 's k n a H
Sec 4 North Twin Island DL 320 Sec 3 DL 1306 Long Tom DL 153 DL 1488
SMELT BAY PARK
DL 1442
DL 1046
f e DL 4201 e
R DL 4564 l
i
t
u
S DL 1045 DL 417 COPELAND ISLANDS MARINE PARK Sec 2 DL 1044
South Twin Island DL 2300
S t r a i t o f G e o r g i a
Sec 1 Sec 1
Sutil Point
COPELAND ISLANDS MARINE PARK
Sec 1
Sec 2
Appendix B Stocking Standards
STOCKING STANDARDS
FPPR S. 16, S. 44
STOCKING STANDARDS– GENERAL
FPPR s. 44(1) applies in all situations and circumstances where a free growing stand is required to be established under FRPA S. 29, for all areas under the FSP.
The regeneration date, free growing heights and stocking standards and species as per FPPR s. 44(1)(a) & (b) are outlined in Tables 1, 2 & 3 following these pages.
EVEN‐AGED MANAGEMENT
The FSP holder will utilize even‐aged management broadly over the areas under the FSP, but on a small‐scale basis (smaller openings). The primarily second‐growth Douglas‐fir dominated stands found in these areas are suited for regenerating fir in exposed areas on moderately productive sites. The prescribing Forester will ensure that openings are designed to also meet with the objectives set out for areas under the FSP, as per the Community Forest Management Objectives (as updated periodically by the CFGP).
PARTIAL HARVESTING
The FSP holder will also utilize a range of partial harvesting methods to ensure that forest management is being done to meet the objectives set out by the community for the areas under the FSP, to leave healthy, dominant trees in each area and that the Mean Annual Increment (M.A.I) of these stands is not being depleted over time (maximizing the long‐term growth). The stocking standards for partial harvesting follow in Tables 1, 2 & 3. Methods include:
INTERMEDIATE CUT
This harvest system removes individual trees or small pockets of trees that create < 0.1 ha opening sizes and where the FSP holder is exempt from the requirements of FRPA sections 29(1). Healthy, dominant overstory trees will be left and the focus will be to remove merchantable, co‐dominant trees or those trees with potential disease or defects, as prescribed on a site‐ specific basis. This practice aims to ensure a disease‐free, genetically healthy, diverse stand remains to regenerate future generations of forest.
SINGLE ENTRY DISPERSED RETENTION STOCKING STANDARDS (SEDRSS)
The purpose and intent of utilizing this silviculture system is also described in Section 12, Stocking Standards, within the FSP. The FSP holder will apply SEDRSS in areas where second‐growth Douglas‐fir or Douglas‐fir/hemlock mixed stands are where the site index is generally between 24 and 36 (height at 50 years of age). Principles for utilizing these standards will be based on;
a. ecologically suitable species, b. maintaining or minimizing impacts to forest health by following the leave tree criteria as set out in the CRIT SEDRSS Framework Implementation Guide (2014), c. maintaining or enhancing the commercially valuable timber supply, and d. monitoring and adapting to changing conditions due either to site specific circumstances or climate change.
Declaration of free growing (stocking obligations met) may not be earlier than two years after completion of harvest.
A well‐spaced crop tree must be ecologically suitable, of good health, have good colour, form and vigour and be relatively free of significant pest infestation in order to be considered as free growing. Free Growing trees must also meet minimum free growing heights as listed in Table 1, according to the site series assigned to each particular Standards Unit, to demonstrate that the trees are adapted to the site, are growing well and can reasonably be expected to continue to do so.
Procedures for surveying in all situations described here will be according to the parameters set out in the CRIT 2014 SEDRSS framework and also follow the Free Growing damage criteria for SEDRSS Managed Stands in Coastal BC for Leave Trees (2014).
SEDRSS standards are set out in Tables 2 and 3, following, which will apply to cutblocks in second‐growth stands within areas under this FSP and where a prescribing Forester has prescribed a Single Entry Dispersed Retention silvicultural system and the overstory (retention) trees are expected to contribute to the free growing obligation.
Cortes Forestry General Partnership Community Forest K4G Stocking Standards
Regeneration Guide Free Growing
Ecologically Suitable Species Stocking Regen Min. Height Biogeoclimatic Site Series Target Minimum Delay Late Species Ht Zone/Subzone Standards ID Conifer Broadleaf (well-spaced/ha) (Max yrs) (yrs) (m) CWHdm47 01 Fd Cw Hw24 Pw31 900 500 6 20 Fd, Hw 3.00 Pw 2.50 Cw 1.50 Hardwood Dr7,42,a 1200 700 Dr 4.00 02* Pl Fd 400 200 3 20 Fd 2.00 Pl 1.25
03 Fd Cw Hw 800 400 6 20 Fd, Hw 2.00 Cw 1.00 04 Fd Cw Pw31 900 500 6 20 Fd 3.00 Pw 2.50 Cw 1.50 05 Cw Fd Pw31 Bg67,47 Hw60 900 500 6 20 Fd, Hw 4.00 Bg 3.50 Pw 2.50 Cw 2.00 Hardwood Act42,a Dr42,a Mb3 1200 700 Dr, Mb, Act 4.00 06 Cw Hw Fd1 900 500 6 20 Fd, Hw 3.00 Cw 1.50 Hardwood Dr7,41,a 1200 700 Dr 4.00 07 Bg47 Cw Fd Bg68,47 Hw60 900 500 6 20 Fd, Hw 4.00 Bg 3.50 Cw 2.00 Hardwood Act41,a Dr41,a Mb,41,a 1200 700 Act, Dr, Mb 4.00 08 Bg47 Cw 900 500 3 20 Bg 3.50 Cw 2.00 09 Cw1 Bg1,47 900 500 3 20 Bg 3.50 Cw 2.00 11 Pl1 Cw1 400 200 3 20 Pl 1.25 Cw 1.00 12 Cw1 Hw1,2 Pw31 Ss35 800 400 3 20 Ss 3.00 Pw 2.50 Hw 2.00 Cw 1.00
^^All CWH dm above Intermediate Cut Fd, Hw, Cw, Pw, Ss
CWHxm47 01 Fd Hw24 Cw Pw31 900 500 6 11 Fd 3.00 Pw 2.50 Hw 2.00 Cw 1.50 Hardwood Dr7,42,a 1200 700 Dr 4.00 02* Pl Fd 400 200 3 11 Fd 2.00 Pl 1.25 03 Fd Pl6 Cw Hw 800 400 6 11 Fd 2.00 Hw, Pl 1.25 Cw 1.00 04 Fd Cw Pw31 900 500 6 11 Fd 3.00 Pw 2.50 Cw 1.50 05 Cw Fd Bg53 Hw Pw31 900 500 6 11 Fd 4.00 Cortes Forestry General Partnership Community Forest K4G Stocking Standards
Regeneration Guide Free Growing
Ecologically Suitable Species Stocking Regen Min. Height Biogeoclimatic Site Series Target Minimum Delay Late Species Ht Zone/Subzone Standards ID Conifer Broadleaf (well-spaced/ha) (Max yrs) (yrs) (m) Bg 3.50 Pw 2.50 Cw 2.00 Act42,a Dr42,a 1200 700 Hw 1.75 Hardwood Mba 1200 700 Act, Dr, Mb 4.00 06 Cw Hw Fd18 Pw Bg7 900 500 6 14 Bg, Fd 3.00 Pw 2.50 Hw 2.00 Cw 1.50 Hardwood Dr7,41,a 1200 700 Dr 4.00 07 Bg47 Cw Fd Hw 900 500 6 11 Fd 4.00 Bg 3.50 Cw 2.00 Hw 1.75 Hardwood Act41,a Dr41,a 1200 700 Act, Dr 4.00 08 Bg47 Cw Ss35 900 500 3 11 Ss 4.00 Bg 3.50 Pw 2.50 Act41,a Dr41,a 1200 700 Cw 2.00 Hardwood Mb41,a 1200 700 Act, Dr, Mb 4.00 09 Cw1 Bg1,47 900 500 3 11 Bg 3.50 Act41,a Dr41,a 1200 700 Cw 2.00 Hardwood Mb41,a 1200 700 Act, Dr, Mb 4.00 11 Pl1 Cw1 400 200 3 11 Pl 1.25 Cw 1.00 12 Cw1 Hw1 Pw31 Ss35 800 400 3 11 Pw 2.50 Ss 1.50 Hw 1.25 Cw 1.00
^^All CWH xm above Intermediate Cut Fd, Cw, Pw, Pl
Footnotes: ^^ Intermediate Cut, all site series with the exception of low productivity stands, the standard applies to Layer 1 trees. *marginally suited for timber production ‐ Crop trees must meet or exceed the free growing damage criteria outlined in the Single Tree Dispersed Retention Stocking Standard Framework ‐ Implementation Guide, 2014 ‐ Footnotes from the Reference Guide for FDP Stocking Standards (incorporating edits March 2019) apply for the CWH dm and the CWH xm1 biogeoclimatic zones listed above and found at: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/forestry/managing‐our‐forest‐resources/silviculture/stocking‐standards ‐Minimum inter‐tree distance of 2.0 metres can be reduced to 1.6 metres for any given site where plantable spots are limited by site characteristics (e.g. Colluvial sites, wet sites, steep slopes, etc), where site conditions limit the ability of the FSP holder to meet target stocking standards.
‐No changes are currently proposed under the above stocking standards for Climate Change as per the 2019 Update to the Forest Development Reference Guide for Stocking Standards: Climate Change. Footnote # Footnote Footnote # Footnote Footnotes below apply to Table 1
Conifer Tree Species 1 suitable on elevated microsites 46 use resistant seedlot south of the Dean Channel 47 risk of balsam wooly adelgid within quarantine area see http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/agriculture-seafood/animals- and-crops/plant-health/insects-and-plant-diseases/nursery-and- "Ba" means amabilis fir; 2 retired July 2017 ornamentals/balsam-woolly-adelgid "Bg" means grand fir; 3 suitable on coarse-textured soils 48 risk of browsing by deer "Bl" means subalpine fir; 4 suitablemedium-textured soils 49 retired November 2010 "Bp" means noble fir; 5 footnote retired 50 restricted to sites where the species occurs as a "Cw" means western red cedar; 6 suitable on nutrient-very-poor sites major species in a pre‐harvest, natural stand "Fd" means Douglas‐fir; 7 suitable on nutrient-medium sites 51 retired July 2017 "Hm" means mountain hemlock; 8 suitable on steep slopes 52 suitable on sheltered microsites with deep soil "Hw" means western hemlock; 9 suitable on warm aspects 53 minor component “Lt” means tamarack; 10 suitable on cool aspects 54 retired July 2017 "Lw" means western larch; 11 suitable on crest slope positions 55 retired July 2017 “Pa” means whitebark pine; 12 suitable on cold air drainage sites "Pl" means lodgepole pine; 13 suitable at upper elevations # Broadleaf Management Constraints "Pw" means white pine; 14 suitable at lower elevations "Py" means ponderosa pine; 15 suitable in the northern portion of biogeoclimatic unit a productive, reliable, and feasible regeneration option “Sb” means black spruce; 16 suitable in the southern portion of biogeoclimatic unit b limited in productivity, reliability and/or feasibility “Se” means Engelmann spruce; 17 suitable in the western portion of biogeoclimatic unit "Ss" means Sitka spruce; 18 suitable in the eastern portion of biogeoclimatic unit “Sw” means white spruce; 19 retired July 2017 # Localized Footnotes "Sx" means hybrid spruce or interior spruce; 20 retired July 2017 "Sxs" means hybrid Sitka spruce; 21 retired July 2017 56 retired July 2017 “Sxw” means hybrid white spruce; 22 suitable in the southern Gardner Canal-Kitlope area "Yc" means yellow cedar. 23 retired July 2017 57 retired November 2010 24 suitable in wetter portion of biogeoclimatic unit 58 South Area - Fd limited to a max 50% of preferred and acceptable well- spaced stems in the IDFmw and all subzones of the ICH due to root rot. See Root Rot Handbook for management issues (FLNRORD 2018). Broadleaf Tree Species “Acb” means balsam poplar; 25 retired July 2017 59 Prince George region - max 1,400 total sph of aspen and cottonwood. “Act” means black cottonwood; 26 suitable minor species on nutrient poor sites Treat as 'ghost' trees in surveys. “At” means trembling aspen; 27 partial high-canopy shade required for succesful establishment 60 retired July 2017 “Dr” means red alder; 28 limited by moisture deficit 61 retired July 2017 “Ep” means common paper birch; 29 risk of heavy browsing by moose 62 retired November 2010 “Mb” means bigleaf maple; 30 retired November 2010 63 retired July 2017 31 must use of blister rust resistant stock. See BC Journal of 66 Mackenzie forest district - may be preferred where risk of snow damage Ecosystems and Management 10(1): 97-100 for supplementary is low or risk of frost damage is excessive on spruce “Qg” means garry oak; information. “Ra” means arbutus; 32 limited by growing‐season frosts 67 Retired July 2017 33 footnote retired and replaced with footnote 'a' 68 Retired July 2017 69 suitable at upper elevations of the biogeoclimatic unit only when used in 34 risk of snow damage the southern portion of the biogeoclimatic unit “Biogeoclimatic unit” or “BGC classification” means 35 use resistant stock to mitigate risk of spruce weevil damage - 70 retired July 2017 the zone, subzone, variant and site series described in the See Ss Weevil Decision Tool: http://pubs.cif- most recent field guide published by the Ministry of Forests ifc.org/doi/abs/10.5558/tfc2013-042 for the identiication and interpretation of ecosystems, as applicable to a harvested area. 200 Pl can be moved from Acceptable to Preferred, to the extent specified below, only on sites where there is a low risk of damage from forest health factors: • where there is > 50% Pl in the pre-harvest stand, Pl can be moved to preferred; • where there is 25-50% Pl in the pre-harvest stand, Pl can be moved to preferred to a maximum of 50% well-spaced stems. For areas with less than 25% Pl in the pre-harvest stand, or where risk of damage from forest health factors is moderate or high, Pl remains acceptable. 36 retired July 2017 “MIN or “Min” means minimum. 37 retired November 2010 201 maximum 50% of preferred and acceptable well-spaced trees 38 footnote retired 202 no advance regeneration in even aged stand management 39 retired July 2017 203 recommended on sites for climate change adaptation 40 risk of redheart damage in areas subject to cold winter outflow win 204 not recommended due to climate change concerns 41 limited by poorly drained soils 205 limited by cold temperatures 42 suitable on sites with a fresh soil moisture regimes 206 plant on exposed mineral soils 43 retired July 2017 207 obstacle planting recommended 208 In addition to the free growing damage criteria, Bl advanced regeneration can be counted as well-spaced only where it meets the following criteria at free growing in even aged management: • apical dominance > 1 (as measured by comparing ratio of leader height to length of most recent branch whorl) at free growing • 75% live crown; suitable in areas of the subzone variant with relatively strong • no scars, forks, crooks, or sweeps, and; 44 maritime influence • where it is < 1.5 m ht at time of harvest. suitable in areas of the subzone variant with relatively strong 45 continental influence Table 2: Single Entry Dispersed Retention Stocking Standards (SEDRSS) CWH dm Biogeoclimatic Zone Regeneration Guide Free Growing Criteria Site Occupancy High Only Regen Only used Moderate Species Retention used Delay Layer*y duringgp plots Retention (Basal( MITD Speciesp Heightg() (m) Biogeoclimatic (suitable) (Basal during (max. (even-aged) Area) Zone Classification Area) plots Years)
Residual Layer 9-15 16-22 23-39 >/= 40 (L1) >/=12.5cm Fdc*, Hw, Cw 0 - 8 m2/ha N/A N/A m2/ha m2/ha m2/ha m2/ha DBH (BA m2/ha)
CWH dm 01, 04, 05, 6 years All layers 06, 07 900 TSS 700 TSS 500 TSS 400 TSS 0 (L2-L4) Regen Layers (L2, outside As per L3, L4) (WS/ha As per Table 1 Fdc*, Hw, Cw of L1 Table 1 for TSS - Target for Site Series dripline Site Series MSS - Minimum) 300 200 500 MSS 100 MSS 0 and 2.0 MSS MSS m
RResidualesidual LLayerayer 9159-15 16-2216 22 2323-28 28 >/=/40 40 (L1) >/=12.5cm Fdc*, Hw, Cw 0 - 8 m2/ha N/A N/A m2/ha m2/ha m2/ha m2/ha DBH (BA m2/ha)
CWH dm 03 6 years 800 TSS 700 TSS 400 TSS 300 TSS 0 All layers (L2- L4) Regen Layers (L2, outside As per L3, L4) (WS/ha As per Table 1 Fdc, Hw, Cw* of L1 Table 1 for TSS - Target for Site Series dripline Site Series MSS - Minimum) 300 100 400 TSS 50 MSS 0 and 2.0 MSS MSS m
‐ The standards above will be used on a site level basis following the 2014 SEDRSS Framework Implementation Guide (Coastal) and the Even‐Aged Mgmt Stocking Standards in this FSP (Table 1). * In moderate retention levels with <16 m2/ha basal area retained, Fdc will be considered an ecologically suitable species for regeneration in layer 4. In areas with >16 ‐ There may be situations where the minimum height has not been achieved, but the understory stems meet all other criteria. In this situation a forest professional can use FPPR Section 97.1 to indicate the obligation has been met and provide a rationale that indicates the crop trees are well established, free from vegetative competition and are not expected to be impacted by a forest health agent.ppyg Table 3: Single Entry Dispersed Retention Stocking Standards (SEDRSS) - CWH xm1 Biogeoclimatic Zone Regeneration Guide Free Growing Criteria Site Occupancy One of these 4 BA Only Regen Species Only used combinations are applicable used Delay Layer* MITD Species Height (m) Biogeoclimatic (suitable) during plots to final SU Regen/FG during (max. Zone Classification SEDRSS obligations plots Years)
Residual Layer 9-15 16-22 23-39 >/= 40 (L1) >/=12.5cm Fdc*, Cw, Hw 0 - 8 m2/ha N/A N/A m2/ha m2/ha m2/ha m2/ha DBH (BA m2/ha)
CWH xm 01, 04, 05, 6 years All layers 06, 07 900 TSS 700 TSS 500 TSS 400 TSS 0 (L2-L4) Regen Layers (L2, outside As per As per Table L3, L4) (WS/ha Fdc*, Cw, Hw of L1 Table 1 for 1 for Site TSS - Target MSS dripline Site Series Series - MiMinimum) i ) 300 200 100 500 MSS 0 and 2.0 MSS MSS MSS m
Residual Layer 9-15 16-22 23-28 >/= 40 (L1) >/=12. 5cm FdcFdc**, Cw, Hw 0 - 8 m2/ha N/A N/A m2/ha m2/ha m2/ha m2/ha DBH (BA m2/ha)
CWH xm 03 6 years 800 TSS 700 TSS 400 TSS 300 TSS 0 All layers (L2-L4) Reggy(,en Layers (L2, outsideoutside AsAs per AsAs per TableTable L3, L4) (WS/ha Fdc*, Cw, Hw of L1 Table 1 for 1 for Site TSS - Target MSS dripline Site Series Series - Minimum) 300 100 400 TSS 50 MSS 0 and 2.0 MSS MSS m
‐ The standards above will be used on a site level basis follow The standards above will be used on a site level basis followinging the 2014 SEDRSS Framework Im the 2014 SEDRSS Framework Implementationplementation Guide Guide ((Coastal)Coastal) and the Even‐A and the Even Agedged M Mgmtgmt Stockin Stockingg Standards in this FSP (Table 1). * In moderate retention levels with <16 m2/ha basal area retained, Fdc will be considered an ecologically suitable species for regeneration in layer 4. In areas with >16 m2/ha, Fdc will not be considered ecologically suitable for acceptable crop species in layer 4. ‐ There may be situations where the minimum height has not been achieved, but the understory stems meet all other criteria. In this situation a forest professional can use FPPR Section 97.1 to indicate the obligation has been met and provide a rationale that indicates the crop trees are well established, free from vegetative competition and are not expected to be impacted by a forest health agent.
Appendix C Vancouver Island Land Use Plan
Higher Level Plan Order is attached following
Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Higher Level Plan Order
Order Establishing Resource Management Zones and Resource Management Zone Objectives within the area covered by the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan, pursuant to sections 3(1) and 3(2), as well as section 9.1 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act (the Act)
I. Pursuant to section 3(1) of the Act, the following zones, as presented on Map 1 (attached), are Resource Management Zones (RMZ):
A. Special Management Zones (SMZ) 1 through 14 and 17 through 22;
B. Resource Management Zones 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 15, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 27, 28, 30, 36, 38, 40, 42, 43, 44, and 47; these RMZ are also referred to as Enhanced Forestry Zones (EFZ);
C. Resource Management Zones 7 and 14; these two RMZ are also referred to as General Management Zones (GMZ).
II. Pursuant to section 3(2) of the Act, the following provisions are Resource Management Zone objectives:
A. for Special Management Zones 1 through 14 and 17 through 22:
1. Sustain forest ecosystem structure and function in SMZs, by: (a) creating or maintaining stand structures and forest attributes associated with mature1 and old2 forests, subject to the following: i. the target for mature seral forest should range between one quarter to one third of the forested area of each SMZ3; and ii. in SMZs where the area of mature forest is currently less than the mature target range referred to in (i) above, the target amount of mature forest must be in place within 50 years; (b) retaining, within cutblocks4, structural forest attributes and elements with important biodiversity functions5; and (c) applying a variety of silvicultural systems, patch sizes and patch shapes across the zone, subject to a maximum cutblock size of 5 ha if clearcut, clearcut with reserves or seed tree silvicultural systems are applied, and 40 ha if shelterwood, selection or retention silvicultural systems are applied6.
1 The mature seral forest is defined as generally 80 to 120 years old or older, depending on species and site conditions. The structure of mature seral forests generally includes canopies that vary vertically or horizontally, or both. The age and structure of the mature seral stage will vary significantly by forest type and from one biogeoclimatic zone to another. 2 The old seral forest is defined as generally greater than 250 years old, containing live and dead (downed and standing) trees of various sizes, including large diameter trees, and of various tree species, including broad-leaved trees. The structure of old seral forest varies significantly by forest type and from one biogeoclimatic zone to another. 3 Mature seral targets will be established through landscape unit planning. See transition provisions under III. 4 Within cutblocks: generally means non-contiguous with cutblock boundaries. 5 This includes, but is not limited to snags, wildlife trees, downed logs. 6 Maximum cutblock sizes refer to net area to be reforested.
1 Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Higher Level Plan Order
2. Despite subsection 1(c) above, cutblocks larger than 5 or 40 ha, as the case may be, may be approved if harvesting is being carried out to recover timber that was damaged by fire, insects, wind or other similar events and wherever possible, the cutblock incorporates structural characteristics of natural disturbances.
3. Pursuant to section 2(1) of the Operational Planning Regulation (OPR)7, the approval of both the district manager, Ministry of Forests and the designated environment official, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks is required for all forest development plans, or parts of forest development plans that relate to areas within the following SMZs: 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 19, 20 and 21.
B. for Special Management Zones 8, and 13, and parts of Special Management Zones 1, 3 and 11, which are located within landscape units with higher biodiversity emphasis, as shown on Map 2:
4. Maintain late-successional habitat elements and attributes of biodiversity8 in forested ecosystems with emphasis on regionally rare and underrepresented ecosystems, by retaining old seral forest at the site series/surrogate level of representation9.
5. Retain late-successional habitat elements and attributes of biodiversity in patches of variable size.
C. for the following Special Management Zones with primary visual resource values: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19 and 22, as shown on Map 3:
6. Maintain the visual quality of known scenic areas in accordance with the recommended visual quality classes in the visual landscape inventory, until the district manager establishes visual quality objectives for the areas.
D. for all Enhanced Forestry Zones, as shown on Map 1, save and except the parts of those zones which are designated as community watersheds as defined in section 41(8) of the Act:
7. To increase the short-term availability of timber,
(a) a cutblock may be larger than 40 ha pursuant to section 11(2)(a) of the OPR; and (b) pursuant to section 68(4) of the OPR, a cutblock is greened-up if it is adequately stocked and the average height of those trees that are (i) the tallest tree in each 0.01 ha plot included in a representative sample, and (ii) a commercially valuable species or other species acceptable to the district manager is at least 1.3 meters;
7 BC Reg. 107/98 O.C. 426/98 - Effective: June 15, 1998.
8 This includes, but is not limited to: large diameter (> 60 cm) live, decaying and dead standing trees (providing nest and cavity sites); downed wood, including large diameter pieces (50 to 150 cm); deciduous broad-leaved trees, both in riparian and upland areas. 9 The level of representation of old seral forest will be applied through landscape unit planning.
2 Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Higher Level Plan Order
unless the district manager determines that a cutblock referred to under (a) or (b) would significantly impact specific hydrological, wildlife, biodiversity, scenic or recreation values.
8. Avoid or mitigate adverse hydrological impacts, which may result from the practices referred to in objective 7, in watersheds with significant watershed sensitivity and significant fisheries values, as determined by the district manager and designated environment official.
9. When proposing the species composition for the purposes of OPR section 39 (3) (o), a person may, pursuant to OPR section 41, select a single species that is ecologically suited to the area, if a mix of species was present on the area before the timber was harvested. 9.1 The area that may be subject to selection of a single species pursuant to objective 9 is limited to no more than 20 per cent of the forested area of any variant within a given EFZ.
E. for Resource Management Zones 7 and 11:
10. To avoid severe social and economic consequences, as determined by the district manager and the designated environment official, the full target of 13 per cent for old growth retention in CWHvm1 may be reduced by up to one third provided that ecologically suitable second growth forest is identified to recruit the shortfall10.
F. for Resource Management Zone 42:
11. Retain old seral forest in CWHvm1 in accordance with the full old seral target of 13 per cent for the variant. 11.1 Despite objective 11, up to one third of the old seral target may be recruited from second growth provided that (a) such recruitment is necessary to avoid severe social and economic consequences; (b) such recruitment will not impact the ability to conserve suitable habitat of identified wildlife in accordance with the Identified Wildlife Management Strategy11; and (c) ecologically suitable second growth forest is identified to recruit the shortfall.12
G. for Special Management Zone 10:
12. Retain or recruit old growth forest in CWHxm2 in accordance with the full old seral target of 9 per cent for the variant.
H. for Resource Management Zone 10
13. Retain old seral forest in CWHxm2 in accordance with the full old seral target of 9 per cent for the variant.
10 The targets for retention or recruitment of old growth forests will be achieved through the establishment of old growth management areas as part of landscape unit planning. 11 See “Managing Identified Wildlife: Procedures and Measures”, Volume 1, February 1999. 12 The targets for retention or recruitment of old growth forests will be achieved through the establishment of old growth management areas as part of landscape unit planning.
3 Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Higher Level Plan Order
13.1 Despite objective 13, up to one third of the old seral target may be recruited from second growth provided that (a) such recruitment is necessary to avoid severe social and economic consequences; (b) such recruitment will not impact the ability to conserve suitable habitat of identified wildlife in accordance with the Identified Wildlife Management Strategy13; and (c) ecologically suitable second growth forest is identified to recruit the shortfall.14
I. for Resource Management Zone 30:
14. Retain all remaining old growth forest in CWHxm2 until landscape unit objectives for old growth retention or recruitment have been established in accordance with the full old seral target of 9 per cent for the variant.
J. for Resource Management Zones 8, 14, 28 and 43:
15. Retain old growth forests to meet old seral targets15 and marbled murrelet habitat requirements16 in the non-contributing17 land base to the fullest extent possible.
16. Beyond retention in the non-contributing land base, retain old forests in the timber harvesting land base, up to the full target amount, if the district manager and the designated environment official determine that such retention is required to maintain critical marbled murrelet habitat18.
III. Transition
17. Pursuant to section 9.1 of the Act, the following objectives will not be implemented in an area until landscape units and objectives have been established for the area, in accordance with section 4 of the Act: Objectives 1(a); 4; 5; 10; 11; 11.1; 12; 13; 13.1; 15; and 16.
18. In the event that landscape units and objectives are not established in an area within 2 years of the date that this order takes effect, the objectives referred to in paragraph 17 will be implemented in the area.
IV. Filing the Order
This order will be filed with the regional manager of the Vancouver Forest Region and will take effect on December 1, 2000.
13 See “Managing Identified Wildlife: Procedures and Measures”, Volume 1, February 1999. 14 The targets for retention or recruitment of old growth forests will be achieved through the establishment of old growth management areas as part of landscape unit planning. 15 See “Landscape Unit Planning Guide”, March 1999. 16 See “Managing Identified Wildlife: Procedures and Measures”, Volume 1, February 1999. 17 Non-contributing: the crown forested land base that does not contribute to the annual allowable cut, but does contribute to biodiversity objectives and targets. 18 Retention or recruitment of old growth forests will be achieved through the establishment of old growth management areas as part of landscape unit planning.
4 Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Higher Level Plan Order
5
Appendix D Cortes Landscape Unit Plan
Cortes Landscape Unit
Sustainable Resource Management Plan
Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations
South Coast Region
2012 Sustainable Resource Management Plan: Cortes Landscape Unit
Acknowledgements
The Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations recognises the following participants and contributors, without which the completion of this Sustainable Resource Management Plan would not have been possible:
International Forest Products Ltd: Bob Craven, RPF; Mike Landers, RPF; Ian Emery, RFT; Michelle Mico, RPBio; Wayne Wall, RPBio; Laszlo Kardos, RPF, PEng; Melinda White
Mosaic Forest Management Ltd.: Dave Gill, RPF
Terminal Forest Products Ltd.: Dave Marquis, RPF
Pollock Forest Management Ltd.: Tania Pollock, RPF
BC Timber Sales: Rob Martin, RPF
Province of British Columbia: Greg George, RPBio; Chuck Anderson, RPF; Peter Verschoor, RPF; Frank DeGagne, RPF; Lew Greentree; Blake Fougere, RPF
Cortes LU SRMP 2012 Table of Contents
1. Introduction ...... 1 2. Landscape Unit Description ...... 2 2.2 Biophysical Description ...... 2 2.3 Summary of Land Status ...... 4 3. Key Resource Tenure Holders ...... 7 3.1 Forest Tenure Holders ...... 7 3.2 Mineral Tenure Holders ...... 8 4. Significant Resource Values ...... 8 4.1 Fish, Wildlife and Biodiversity...... 8 4.2 Provincial Parks & Protected Areas ...... 9 4.3 Water Quality ...... 9 4.4 Private Land ...... 9 4.5 Forest Resources ...... 9 4.6 Mineral Resources ...... 10 4.7 Recreation ...... 10 5. First Nations ...... 11 6. OGMA Methodology ...... 11 6.1 Existing Planning Processes ...... 11 6.2 Assessment and Review ...... 12 6.3 Boundary Mapping ...... 12 6.4 Amendment Policy...... 13 6.5 Mitigation of Timber Supply Impacts ...... 13 7. Landscape Unit Plan Objectives ...... 13
List of Tables
Table 1 Land Status of the Cortes Landscape Unit ...... 5 Table 2. Current Level of Old Growth Forest and Old Growth Targets by Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification Unit...... 6 Table 3. Non-contributing, Constrained THLB and Unconstrained THLB ...... 7
List of Appendices
Appendix I OGMA Summary and Rationale ...... 14 Appendix II List of Acronyms ...... 18 Appendix III Consultation Summary ...... 19
Cortes LU SRMP 2012
1. Introduction
This Sustainable Resource Management Plan identifies protection measures for landscape level biodiversity and old growth forests in the Cortes Landscape Unit (LU). A description of the landscape unit, discussion on significant resource values, and an Old Growth Management Area (OGMA) summary and rationale are provided. See Appendix 1 for the OGMA summary and Appendix 2 for a list of acronyms used.
Biological diversity or biodiversity is defined as: ‘the diversity of plants, animals and other living organisms in all their forms and levels of organisation, and includes the diversity of genes, species and ecosystems as well as the evolutionary and functional processes that link them’1. British Columbia is the most biologically diverse province in Canada. In British Columbia, 124 species or subspecies of known vertebrates and 309 vascular plants are listed for legal designation as threatened or endangered2. The continuing loss of biological diversity will have a major impact on the health and functions of ecosystems and the quality of life in the province (Resources Inventory Committee, 1998).
Planning for OGMA and Wildlife Tree Patch (WTP) biodiversity values is recognized as a high priority for the province. LU Planning through Section 93.4 of the Land Act for the purposes of the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) allows for the legal establishment of objectives to address landscape level biodiversity values. Managing for biodiversity through retention of old growth forests is important not only for wildlife, but can also provide important benefits to ecosystem management, protection of water quality and preservation of other natural resources. Although not all elements of biodiversity can be, or need be, maintained on every hectare, a broad geographic distribution of old growth ecosystems is intended to help sustain the genetic and functional diversity of native species across their historic ranges.
The Sunshine Coast Forest District completed LU boundaries and assigned Biodiversity Emphasis Options (BEO) in accordance with the direction provided by government. There are 26 LU’s in this district. Through a ranking process the Cortes LU was rated as an intermediate BEO.
Substantial work was completed in 2004-2005 by the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands (MAL), Bill Lasuta and Associates Ltd., and Mosaic Forest Management Ltd. with input provided by BC Timber Sales (BCTS) and Ministry of Environment (MOE) as well as from forest licensees. Funding was provided through the Forest Investment Account (FIA).
1 Definition of Biodiversity from page 2 of the Forest Practices Code Biodiversity Guidebook (September 1995) 2 BC Conservation Data Centre 2010. BC Species and Ecosystems Explorer. BC Minist. Of Environ. Victoria, British Columbia. Available: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/atrisk/toolintro.html
Cortes LU SRMP 1 2012
Subsequent work was completed in 2010 by Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations in cooperation with forest licensees.
Public review and comment and First Nations consultation was completed through July and August of 2010 on the proposed OGMAs. A summary of comments from the 60 day public review and comment period is included in Appendix III
Supporting documentation regarding government policy, planning processes and biodiversity concepts are provided in the 1995 Biodiversity Guidebook, the 1999 Landscape Planning Guide (LUPG), the Vancouver Forest Region Landscape Unit Planning Strategy (1999), and the Sustainable Resource Management Planning Framework: A Landscape-level Strategy for Resource Development.
2. Landscape Unit Description
2.2 Biophysical Description The Cortes LU covers a total area of 55,659 ha, encompassing the main islands of Maurelle, Read, Raza, Cortes, West Redonda, and East Redonda. Several smaller islands, and groups of islands, such as Marina Island, the Rendezvous Islands, and the Penn Islands, to name a few, lie between the larger ones to make up the landscape unit. Desolation Sound lies to the south of the LU and Pryce Channel to the north (Figure 1).
Of the total LU area, 39,726 ha (72%) is within the Crown forest land base, with 25,125 ha of Crown forest included within the THLB. The remaining 15,933 ha (28%) is non- forested (rock, alpine forests, water) or non-Crown (private land, Indian Reserves) and have been excluded from any OGMA contributions and calculations.
The Cortes LU lies within the Georgia Basin and Southern Pacific Ranges Ecosections. Its climate is best described as warm and dry in the summer, and cool and moist in the winter. The higher elevations of West and East Redonda Islands are cooler and moister with moderate snowfall in the winter months
Cortes LU SRMP 2 2012
.
The LU is comprised of the following seven BEC subzones/variants: Coastal Western Hemlock, southern dry maritime (CWHdm); Coast Western Hemlock, submontane moist maritime (CWHmm1); Coastal Western Hemlock, submontane very wet maritime (CWHvm1), Coastal Western Hemlock, montane very wet maritime (CWHvm2); Coastal Western Hemlock, very dry maritime, eastern variant (CWHxm1); Coastal Western Hemlock, very dry maritime, western variant (CWHxm2); and Mountain Hemlock,
Cortes LU SRMP 3 2012
windward moist maritime (MHmm1). These seven BEC subzones/variants represent two different Natural Disturbance Types (NDT), with CWHvm1, CWHvm2, and MHmm1 in NDT1 (rare stand initiating events), and CWHdm, CWHmm1, CWHxm1, and CWHxm2 in NDT 2 (infrequent stand-initiating events).
Forests in NDT 1 are influenced by rare stand-initiating events and historically were generally uneven-aged or multi-storied uneven aged, with regeneration occurring in gaps created by the death of individual trees or small patches of trees. Approximately 21% of the productive forest area of the Cortes LU is within NDT 1. The remaining productive forest is within NDT 2. These forest ecosystems are influenced by infrequent stand-initiating events and historically were usually even-aged, but extended post-fire regeneration periods produced some stands with uneven-aged characteristics.
Low relief islands (such as Cortes Island) and accessible areas of the remaining islands in the CWHxm1, CWHxm2, CWHmm1, CWHdm and CWHvm1 have sustained substantial levels of harvesting over the years. Many of these areas now support thrifty second growth, and remnant patches of old growth forests are scattered throughout. Old growth representation targets in the CWH vm1, CWH vm2, and MH mm1 BEC variants can be met predominantly from the non-contributing (NC) land base. However, in the lower elevation BEC’s, such as the CWH xm1, CWH xm2, and CWH mm1, more of the old seral target is derived from the partially contributing and contributing land base.
2.3 Summary of Land Status
Land status within the Cortes landscape unit is summarised in Table 1. There are various ownership classes that are excluded from the Crown Forest land base and therefore excluded from the OGMA selection process. This includes 9112 hectares of private land, 482 ha of woodlots, and 393 hectares of Indian Reserve. Although suitable forested stands within the parks and ecological reserves in the landscape unit cannot be legally established as OGMAs, 7,436 ha contributes to the Crown Forest Land Base. A portion of that area has been identified as OGMAs and will contribute to the old growth targets.
Of the total area, 39,726.1 hectares (71%) are within the Crown Forested Land Base (CFLB). The remaining 15,932.7 hectares (29%) of the landscape unit are classified as non-forested or non-Crown (rock, alpine tundra, water, private land, etc.) and have been excluded from OGMA contributions and calculations.
Cortes LU SRMP 4 2012
Table 1 Land Status of the Cortes Landscape Unit
Crown Forest Excluded Land Total Area Ownership Class Land Base (ha) Base (ha) (ha) Total of LU % Private 0.0 9,111.9 9,111.9 16.4 Federal Reserve 0.5 8.0 8.5 0.0 Indian Reserve 0.0 393.0 393.0 0.7 Crown Ecological Reserve 5,261.8 922.1 6,183.9 11.1 Crown UREP 212.3 11.7 224.0 0.4 TSA or PSYU 30,968.2 4,553.2 35,521.3 63.9 Provincial Park 2,112.8 445.4 2,558.2 4.6 Provincial Park or Reserve 17.9 2.6 20.5 0.0 Misc Reserve 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 Misc Reserve 43.0 0.5 43.4 0.1 Woodlot License 1,109.6 481.5 1,591.1 2.9 Crown Misc. Reserves 0.0 1.8 1.8 0.0 Total 39,726.1 15,932.7 55,659.4 100.0
Table 2 provides a breakdown of the landbase based on biogeoclimatic ecosystem classification (BEC) variants or subzones, and lists the OGMA target. Old seral representation targets are determined and applied based on the Crown forest area in each BEC variant. Landbase classification information is used in landscape unit planning to minimize timber supply impacts, however, operationally the harvestable area and the Timber Harvesting Land Base (THLB) are not consistent because inventories and assumptions used to identify the THLB area are not always an accurate representation of what timber will be harvested. There is usually some harvesting of forest that did not contribute to timber supply forecast used in the last Allowable Annual Cut (AAC) determination.
Old growth targets are not set for the CMAunp ecotype as it is predominantly non-forest and does not make up part of the productive forest land base. However, it is possible that small forested areas may be captured in the alpine, and where analysis determines that they are suitable for biodiversity conservation may be selected as OGMAs.
Cortes LU SRMP 5 2012
Table 2. Current Level of Old Growth Forest and Old Growth Targets by Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification Unit
Excluded Crown OGMA Crown Forested Land Base Land Base Forested Total Target % BEC label (ha) Land Base Area (ha) (ha) Contrib- Partial Non Con- X ( C + P + N ) % Ha uting Contributing tributing CMAunp 1.6 71.2 1.6 72.9 0.00 0.0 CWHdm 8905.4 1871.6 6139.5 2503.1 16916.5 19419.6 0.09 1522.5 CWHmm1 285.3 53.0 41.0 30.2 379.2 409.5 0.09 34.1 CWHvm1 1535.6 828.4 2864.0 359.3 5227.9 5587.2 0.13 679.6 CWHvm2 741.0 403.9 1620.2 307.9 2765.1 3073.0 0.13 359.5 CWHxm1 4209.5 308.8 1886.6 8225.2 6404.9 14630.1 0.09 576.4 CWHxm2 4846.3 1059.6 1053.5 3908.3 6959.4 10867.6 0.09 626.3 MHmm1 41.2 35.0 995.2 527.5 1071.4 1598.9 0.19 203.6 20564.3 4560.3 14601.5 15932.7 39726.1 55658.8 4002.1
CWHdm: Coastal Western Hemlock biogeoclimatic zone, dry maritime subzone. CWHmm1: Coastal Western Hemlock, submontane moist maritime variant CWHvm1: Coastal Western Hemlock biogeoclimatic zone, submontane very wet maritime variant. CWHvm2: Coastal Western Hemlock biogeoclimatic zone, montane very wet maritime variant. CWHxm1 Coastal Western Hemlock biogeoclimatic zone, windward very dry maritime variant CWHxm2: Coastal Western Hemlock biogeoclimatic zone, western very dry maritime variant MHmm1: Mountain Hemlock biogeoclimatic zone, windward moist maritime variant.
Cortes LU SRMP 6 2012
Table 3 outlines the total amount of OGMA required and established in each variant/subzone and from which forest category (e.g. non-contributing or contributing). The OGMAs delineated as part of the Cortes Landscape Unit Plan meet the old growth targets consistent with those targets specified in the Order Establishing Provincial Non-spatial Old Growth Objectives. A rationale for OGMA designations within the Cortes landscape unit is provided in Appendix 1. The location of proposed OGMAs is identified in the map that is part of the landscape unit plan.
Table 3. Non-contributing, Constrained THLB and Unconstrained THLB
OGMA in OGMA in OGMA in OGMA in Difference OGMA Non- Partial Established Contributing Excluded (Established - Target % Contributing Contributing BEC label OGMA (C) (X) Target) (ha) (N) (P) % Ha % ha % ha % ha % ha ha CWHdm 0.09 1522.5 1536.4 62.2 956.1 14.9 228.3 21.2 325.4 1.7 26.6 13.9 CWHmm1 0.09 34.1 40.4 51.3 20.7 11.3 4.6 37.4 15.1 0.0 0.0 6.3 CWHvm1 0.13 679.6 688.0 79.7 548.5 7.1 49.2 12.3 84.8 0.8 5.6 8.4 CWHvm2 0.13 359.5 371.3 88.4 328.2 4.7 17.5 0.2 0.8 6.7 24.8 11.8 CWHxm1 0.09 576.4 599.9 41.0 246.0 4.4 26.6 53.4 320.2 1.2 7.0 23.4 CWHxm2 0.09 626.3 643.8 46.7 300.4 29.7 191.5 19.2 123.5 4.4 28.4 17.5 MHmm1 0.19 203.6 215.4 100 215.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 4002.1 4095.2 63.9 2615.2 12.6 517.6 21.2 869.9 2.3 92.4 93.1
3. Key Resource Tenure Holders
The process to select OGMAs included the identification of tenures that are administered by the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, and the Ministry of Energy and Mines. The selection of OGMAs generally avoided placement within existing tenures where permanent forest disturbance could occur (mineral claims, power projects).
3.1 Forest Tenure Holders
The Cortes LU is within the Sunshine Coast Timber Supply Area (TSA). Three forest licensees, three woodlot licensees, and BC Timber Sales operate in the landscape unit. A&A Trading holds a chart area on the northern portion of West Redonda Island, International Forest Products Ltd. hold chart areas over Raza and East Redonda Islands, and BC Timber Sales operates on the southern portion of West Redonda and Maurelle, Islands. Northwest Hardwoods holds an overlapping deciduous licence throughout the
Cortes LU SRMP 7 2012
LU. Woodlot Licences 46 and 2062 are located on Read Island. Woodlot Licence 90 is located on Cortes Island.
3.2 Mineral Tenure Holders
At the time of writing, there are twenty one mineral tenures located in the Cortes Landscape Unit, including: 549970, 549376, 549603, 549382, 549597, 549590, 549389, 555987, 555792, 555852, 555854, 804823, 804842, 804862, 804982, 805003, 805042, 631723, 645323, 661943, 661944. The selection of OGMAs followed the intent of avoiding placement over existing tenure holders, where possible.
The establishment of OGMAs will not have an impact on the status of existing aggregate, mineral and gas permits or tenures. Exploration and development activities are permitted in OGMAs but the preference is to proceed with exploration and development in a way that is sensitive to the old growth values of the OGMA. If exploration and development proceeds to the point of significantly impacting old growth values, then the OGMA will be replaced.
4. Significant Resource Values
The Cortes LU supports a range of natural resource values and features, and a diversity of social and cultural values and influences.
4.1 Fish, Wildlife and Biodiversity
Eighteen wildlife species of management concern are known or suspected to be present in the Cortes LU (BC Conservation Data Centre). These include RED-listed, BLUE-listed and regionally important species. Special habitats, which can be protected under FRPA, for species like mountain goats and grizzly bears are not present in the Cortes LU. Conversely, marbled murrelet nesting habitat has been identified and although used for OGMAs, to date none has been proposed for protection within Wildlife Habitat Areas.
The intent of defining OGMAs is not to address the individual needs of all these species, but rather to provide a strong foundation for landscape level biodiversity management. In the Cortes LU, the species of specific concern when identifying OGMAs was Marbled Murrelet. To that end, a total of 28 Good or Superior Marbled Murrelet polygons were identified and OGMAs overlap each one of these.
Cortes LU SRMP 8 2012
4.2 Provincial Parks & Protected Areas
There are several small and medium sized parks in the Cortes LU, including: Teakerne Arm Provincial Park (128 ha), Walsh Cove Provincial Park (85 ha), and Roscoe Bay Provincial Park (247 ha) on West Redonda Island, Surge Narrows Provincial Park (488 ha) on Maurelle Island, Ha’thayim Marine Provincial Park (1277 ha), Smelt Bay (16 ha) and Mansons Landing (100 ha) Provincial Park on Cortes Island, Read Island Provincial Park (639 ha), and Rendezvous Island South Provincial Park (163 ha). Covering the entire east half of East Redonda Island is the East Redonda Island Ecological Reserve (6212 ha). Some of the park and ecological reserve area reported above is water.
In combination, the parks offer a variety of activities including: hiking trails, canoeing, sea kayaking, scuba diving, swimming, marine fishing, wildlife viewing, campsite & wilderness camping and picnic areas. The primary role of the ecological reserve is to conserve representative coastal ecosystems in the CWH and MH biogeoclimatic zones.
4.3 Water Quality There are no established community watersheds within the Cortes LU. However, potable water from ground and surface sources (streams and lakes) is required to support the population living on Cortes, and to a much lesser extent, Maurelle and Read Islands as well.
4.4 Private Land
Most of the private land in the Cortes LU is located on Cortes, Read, Maurelle, Marina, and other small islands. Cortes Island is home to approximately 950 residents, located primarily in the communities of Whaletown, Squirrel Cove, and Manson’s Landing. Only small parcels of private land are located on portions of East and West Redonda Islands. Much of the private land has been altered from its natural state for settlement, timber harvesting, agriculture or recreational purposes.
4.5 Forest Resources
Several of the islands within this LU support a substantial timber harvesting land base. Continued access to commercially valuable timber, including future second growth, is a significant concern to forest licensees.
Commercially valuable tree species in the Cortes LU are most easily described by elevation. Low elevation forests are dominated by Douglas-fir, Western Hemlock, and
Cortes LU SRMP 9 2012
Western red cedar. Western and Mountain Hemlock, Amabilis Fir, and Yellow cedar are the most common species at mid to high elevations.
4.6 Mineral Resources
Subsurface resources (minerals, coal, oil, and gas) and aggregate resources are valuable to the province, but are difficult to characterise due to their hidden nature.
Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) has rated the industrial and metallic mineral potential of this LU as High. This ranking is based on a qualitative analysis which takes into account the values of known resources, past exploration and production as well as the number of known mineral occurrences and a subjective probability estimate of value by industry experts.
4.7 Recreation
The Cortes LU is easily accessible by boat from various population centres on the Sunshine Coast and Vancouver Island. Scheduled ferry service exists between Herriot Bay on Quadra Island and Whaletown on Cortes Island. Recreational boating and commercial tourism use is heavy during the summer months, especially in and around Cortes Island. The number of people living in this LU likely doubles in the summer. Winter recreational activity is limited due to the remoteness of most of the Landscape Unit to motorized access and poorer weather conditions. The Cortes LU does not experience the same hunting pressure as areas in closer proximity to larger populations. Any recreational hunting that does occur in this LU would likely be on populated islands with minor incursions onto those islands with road systems in place that can handle ATV’s or 4-wheel drive vehicles. Stream angling and lake fishing opportunities exist but are limited. Trail hiking, berry and mushroom picking and wildlife viewing/sightseeing also occur, but predominantly during the summer months. Overall, recreation use in the Cortes LU would be rated as moderate to high.
Cortes LU SRMP 10 2012
5. First Nations
The Cortes LU is located within the claimed traditional territories of the Klahoose, Xwémalhkwu (Homalco), Sliammon, We Wai Kai (Cape Mudge) and Wei Wai Kum (Campbell River) First Nations. The Nanwakolas Strategic Engagement Agreement is referenced with respect to consultation (using their consultation process for consultation with the Kwiakah and Wei Wai Kum (Campbell River) FN).
Between 1997 and 1999, an Archaeological Overview Assessment model was developed by Millennia Research to indicate where archaeological sites are most likely located. This was done to minimize potential impacts by forestry operations on culturally important areas.
It is not the province’s intention to limit the ability of any parties at the treaty negotiation table to discuss issues of interest in these areas, nor to take administrative or operational action that has the potential to infringe the existing Aboriginal or treaty rights of the First Nations in these areas. These OGMAs do not affect First Nations Aboriginal rights and title, nor do they affect traditional and cultural activities.
6. OGMA Methodology
6.1 Existing Planning Processes
An important part of OGMA planning is to ensure that separate planning processes complement each other. For example, OGMAs are often situated within or adjacent to MAMU habitat in order to overlap constraints and to increase patch size. These larger patches then allow greater opportunity to improve connectivity between adjacent patches.
Efforts are also made to include suitable forested stands adjacent to high value wildlife and recreational features such as wetland, lakes and streams wherever possible to enhance conservation measures for these values. Areas previously identified as Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) are included in OGMAs where they provide mature or old forest representation or are in under-represented types of ecosystem. In addition, some forest stands not classified as “old growth” are included in OGMAs to reflect operational constraints related to management and to increase patch size. The intent is to maintain a series of old forest habitat patches across probable movement corridors to allow wildlife dispersal and gene flow. The use of this approach at the landscape level and conservation of biodiversity at the stand level (e.g. Wildlife Tree
Cortes LU SRMP 11 2012
Patches) will increase the likelihood of sustaining ecosystems and wildlife populations well distributed across their natural range.
6.2 Assessment and Review
Efforts were made during preparation of this LU plan to ensure OGMAs were generally distributed spatially and not concentrated in a particular area or mapsheet. This is in keeping with the “coarse filter” approach of biodiversity management at the landscape scale, whereby representative “old growth” stands are protected in order to maintain ecosystem processes and specific wildlife habitat requirements that may be poorly understood.
In all cases, a detailed air photo review was performed to confirm the forest cover attributes and suitability of a given stand for OGMA inclusion; as follow up, satellite imagery was used to help locate OGMA boundaries and verify suitability. Numerous stands have also been field checked to verify the presence of desirable old seral characteristics.
OGMAs were selected based on a review of stand attributes in an effort to maximize their value from a biodiversity standpoint while minimizing timber supply impact. In general, opportunities to recruit larger patches to provide for forest interior habitat conditions were favoured over smaller patches. In this search, an effort was extended to minimize the impact on the timber supply by combining areas in the non-contributing (parks, ecological reserves) with areas within the timber harvesting land base. In addition, a significant number of smaller remnant patches containing age class 9 were delineated in conformance with the Landscape Unit Planning Guidebook (LUPG).
6.3 Boundary Mapping
OGMA boundaries used natural features (e.g. streams) or man-made features (e.g. roads, cutblock edges) wherever possible to ensure they could be located on the ground. OGMAs were also delineated to include complete forest stands (forest cover polygons) wherever possible to reduce operational uncertainty and increase ease of OGMA mapping. OGMAs were mapped using a 1:20,000 scale TRIM base map which forms the legal standard for measurement. Procedures for operating within OGMAs are discussed in the OGMA Amendment policy.
Cortes LU SRMP 12 2012
6.4 Amendment Policy
A MFLNRO Coast Region policy provides direction to forest tenure agreement holders when applying for amendments to OGMA legal objectives. Amendment procedures cover such things as minor or major amendments for resource development (e.g. roads, bridges, boundary issues, rock quarries and gravel pits), or relocation of OGMAs. The policy also discusses acceptable management activities and review procedures. The amendment policy forms an integral part of this plan.
In general, most OGMA boundaries are not ‘permanently fixed’, they can be moved over time so long as biodiversity objectives are maintained. Replacement OGMAs are required to be equivalent or better than the original. As stand succession proceeds, some currently unsuitable forests may become good OGMA candidates and as such periodic assessment or revision to the OGMAs may occur.
6.5 Mitigation of Timber Supply Impacts
During delineation of OGMAs for priority biodiversity provisions, an attempt was made to mitigate short and long-term impacts on timber supply. For example, OGMAs were delineated first in the non-contributing forest land base, however, since representation is at the subzone/variant level, the non-contributing land base could not always satisfy old forest requirements. Where this occurred, portions of the timber harvesting land base from most constrained to least constrained were assessed and included as OGMAs. Occasionally, a younger aged forest stand from the non-contributing land base was used for OGMA, particularly where patch size of an existing OGMA could be increased. Generally, more THLB was required in lower elevation BEC units due to a longer disturbance history and lower amounts of non-contributing forest land.
OGMAs were not established in forest stands that were in approved Category A blocks in Forest Stewardship Plans (FSP) unless agreed to by the licensee. This follows the direction outlined in the Landscape Unit Planning Guide.
7. Landscape Unit Plan Objectives
Landscape Unit Objectives will be legally established within the framework of FRPA and as such will become Higher Level Plan objectives. Other Operational Plans must be consistent with these objectives.
Cortes LU SRMP 13 2012
Appendix I: OGMA Summary and Rationale
OGMA OGMA BEC Total Comments Number Area (ha) 1 CWHxm2 29.0 Old forest representation, shoreline, May Lake 2 CWHdm 15.4 Old forest representation, Homfray Channel shoreline, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 3 CWHxm2 4.5 Recruitment 4 CWHmm1 34.9 Old forest representation 4 CWHxm2 17.6 6 CWHdm 7.9 Old forest representation, adjacent to Pryce Channel 6 CWHvm1 21.8 6 CWHvm2 8.8 7 CWHxm2 20.0 Old forest representation, shoreline, Caroline Lake 8 CWHdm 19.5 Old forest representation, Pendrell Sound shoreline, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 11 CWHdm 0.3 Recruitment, adjacent to Pryce Channel 11 CWHvm1 7.1 11 CWHvm2 11.2 13 CWHdm 10.6 Old forest representation, Waddington Channel shoreline 14 CWHdm 23.0 Recruitment, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 14 CWHvm1 1.3 15 CWHdm 2.6 Old forest representation, adjacent to Pryce Channel 15 CWHvm1 17.8 15 CWHvm2 12.9 16 CWHvm1 4.9 Old forest representation 17 CWHdm 11.1 Old forest representation 17 CWHvm1 20.4 17 CWHvm2 12.9 18 CWHdm 24.0 Old forest representation, adjacent to Pryce Channel 18 CWHvm1 64.2 18 CWHvm2 33.5 19 CWHdm 14.5 Old forest representation, Pryce Channel shoreline 20 CWHdm 49.7 Old forest representation, recruitment, shoreline Waddington Channel 21 CWHdm 8.3 Old forest representation, shoreline, Calm Channel 21 CWHvm1 1.7 22 CWHdm 18.1 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 22 CWHvm1 12.1 23 CWHxm2 64.6 Old forest representation, recruitment, shoreline, White Rock Passage 24 CWHdm 25.0 Old forest representation, shoreline, Deer Passage 26 CWHdm 21.5 Adjacent to Pryce Channel 27 CWHdm 42.5 Old forest representation 28 CWHdm 22.2 Old forest representation, adjacent to Walsh Cove Park 29 CWHdm 3.0 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 29 CWHvm1 12.3 32 CWHdm 3.8 Old forest representation, adjacent to Waddington Channel 32 CWHvm1 3.5 33 CWHdm 8.3 Old forest representation 33 CWHvm1 15.3
Cortes LU Plan 14 2012
OGMA OGMA BEC Total Comments Number Area (ha) 33 CWHvm2 28.7 33 MHmm1 14.4 34 CWHxm2 36.5 Old forest representation, recruitment, Elephant Mountain 36 CWHdm 13.9 Recruitment, Walsh Cove Park 38 CWHdm 5.9 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 41 CWHvm1 6.5 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 42 CWHdm 19.6 Recruitment, Adjacent to Walsh Cove Park 44 CWHdm 34.8 Old forest representation, Waddington Channel shoreline 44 CWHvm1 8.1 46 CWHvm1 12.8 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 46 CWHvm2 3.5 47 CWHxm2 36.9 Recruitment, shoreline, White Rock Passage 48 CWHdm 35.0 Old forest representation, recruitment, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 48 CWHvm1 53.4 48 CWHvm2 61.8 48 MHmm1 34.7 51 CWHxm2 42.7 Old forest representation, Drew Passage shoreline 55 CWHdm 14.0 Recruitment 57 CWHxm2 4.7 Old forest representation 58 CWHxm2 56.6 Old forest representation 61 CWHvm1 25.9 Old forest representation, Cloud Lake shoreline 62 CWHvm1 19.8 Old forest representation 64 CWHdm 4.5 Old forest representation 65 CWHdm 3.2 Old forest representation 65 CWHvm1 29.3 66 CWHdm 6.3 Old forest representation, recruitment 66 CWHvm1 5.1 67 CWHdm 10.4 Old forest representation 68 CWHvm1 2.8 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 68 CWHvm2 9.3 68 MHmm1 2.8 70 CWHvm2 8.6 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 71 CWHdm 164.2 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 71 CWHvm1 73.0 71 CWHvm2 80.5 71 MHmm1 75.1 72 CWHdm 38.6 Old forest representation, adjacent to Waddington Channel 73 CWHdm 30.5 Old forest representation 75 CWHdm 3.0 Old forest representation, recruitment 75 CWHvm1 18.8 79 CWHdm 2.9 Old forest representation 81 CWHdm 15.7 Old forest representation 83 CWHdm 21.2 Old forest representation 84 CWHdm 4.7 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 84 CWHvm1 88.6 84 CWHvm2 89.9 84 MHmm1 53.8
Cortes LU SRMP 15 2012
OGMA OGMA BEC Total Comments Number Area (ha) 86 CWHdm 63.2 Old forest representation, recruitment, Lewis Channel shoreline 89 CWHdm 104.4 Old forest representation, Lewis Channel shoreline 90 CWHdm 3.0 recruitment 91 CWHxm2 7.0 Old forest representation 92 CWHxm2 5.8 Old forest representation, shoreline, Evans Bay 93 CWHvm1 8.4 Old forest representation, lakeshore 94 CWHdm 4.8 Old forest representation 96 CWHvm1 11.9 Old forest representation 97 MHmm1 28.1 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 98 CWHdm 18.3 Old forest representation 99 CWHdm 28.9 Old forest representation, recruitment, Teakerne Arm park, Cassel Lake shoreline 100 CWHvm1 29.1 Old forest representation 101 CWHdm 26.0 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 101 CWHvm1 14.8 101 CWHvm2 0.6 102 CWHvm1 5.4 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 104 CWHdm 4.2 Old forest representation, Teakerne Arm park 105 CWHdm 51.3 Old forest representation, recruitment, Robertson Lake shoreline, Hathayim Marine Park 106 CWHdm 20.8 Old forest representation 107 CWHdm 17.8 Old forest representation, lakeshore 108 CWHdm 13.5 Old forest representation, Teakerne Arm park, shoreline 111 CWHdm 84.8 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve, Homfray Channel shoreline 112 CWHxm2 4.7 Old forest representation, shoreline, Evans Bay 113 CWHdm 0.2 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 113 CWHvm1 9.7 113 CWHvm2 7.6 115 CWHdm 28.9 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 115 CWHvm1 31.3 115 CWHvm2 1.6 117 CWHxm2 6.1 Old forest representation, shoreline, Evans Bay 118 CWHvm1 9.0 Old forest representation 119 CWHdm 15.0 Old forest representation, Hathayim Marine Park 121 CWHxm1 10.4 Old forest representation, shoreline Von Donop Inlet, Hathayim Marine Park 122 CWHdm 3.2 Recruitment, Willey Lake shoreline, Hathayim Marine Park 122 CWHxm1 5.3 123 CWHxm1 12.4 Old forest representation, Sutil Channel shoreline 124 CWHdm 61.1 Old forest representation 125 CWHdm 9.3 Old forest representation, Von Donop Inlet, Hathayim Marine Park shoreline 125 CWHxm1 14.3 126 CWHxm1 30.3 Old forest representation, Von Donop Inlet, Hathayim Marine Park shoreline 128 CWHdm 135.7 Old forest representation, recruitment, Black Lake shore line, Roscoe Bay park 129 CWHxm1 33.7 Recruitment, Von Donop Inlet, Hathayim Marine Park shoreline 130 CWHxm1 20.7 Old forest representation 131 CWHxm1 13.5 Old forest representation, recruitment, Sutil Channel shoreline 132 CWHxm2 12.3 Old forest representation, Read Island Park 133 CWHxm2 37.5 Old forest representation, recruitment, Read Island Park, shoreline Hoskyn Channel 134 CWHdm 12.7 Old forest representation, Thompson Lake shoreline
Cortes LU SRMP 16 2012
OGMA OGMA BEC Total Comments Number Area (ha) 135 CWHdm 16.2 Old forest representation, Black Lake shoreline, Roscoe Bay Park 137 CWHdm 2.0 Recruitment, Lewis Channel shoreline 137 CWHxm1 8.8 138 CWHxm1 33.5 Old forest representation, Carrington Bay shoreline 139 CWHxm1 9.9 Old forest representation, Hathayim Marine Park shoreline 140 CHWxm2 5.7 Old forest representation, Rosen Lake shoreline, Read Island Park 141 CWHxm1 6.9 Old forest representation 143 CWHxm1 18.8 Old forest representation 145 CWHxm1 3.7 Old forest representation, Read Island Park 146 CWHxm1 12.4 Old forest representation, Sutil Channel, Read Island Park 147 CWHxm1 16.7 Old forest representation, Squirrel Cove shoreline 148 CWHxm1 16.1 Old forest representation 150 CWHxm1 15.4 Old forest representation, Carrington Bay shoreline 151 CWHxm1 70.1 Old forest representation, shoreline, Hoskyn Channel, Read Island Park 153 CWHxm1 12.6 Old forest representation, Desolation Sound shoreline 155 CWHxm1 8.3 Old forest representation, Carrington Lagoon shoreline 157 CWHxm1 7.4 Old forest representation, Lewis Channel shoreline 160 CWHxm1 10.1 Old forest representation, shoreline , Desolation Sound 162 CWHxm1 29.1 Recruitment, Martin Island 163 CWHxm1 65.1 Old forest representation 166 CWHxm1 18.9 Old forest representation 167 CWHxm1 25.5 Old forest representation 168 CWHxm1 19.5 Old forest representation, shoreline, Hague and Gunflint Lakes 170 CWHxm1 19.9 Recruitment 176 CWHxm1 4.4 Old forest representation, adjacent to Refuge Lagoon 177 CWHxm2 11.9 Old forest representation 178 MHmm1 6.5 Old forest representation, East Redonda Ecological Reserve 179 CWHvm1 8.6 Old forest representation 180 CWHdm 10.9 Old forest representation, Lewis channel shoreline 181 CWHxm1 3.7 Recruitment, Lewis Channel shoreline 182 CWHxm1 13.6 Recruitment, shoreline, Desolation Sound 183 CWHxm2 13.1 Recruitment, Evans Bay shoreline 186 CWHdm 4.7 Old forest representation, Desolation Sound shoreline 186 CWHxm1 9.1 187 CWHdm 14.5 Old forest representation, Teakerne Arm shoreline 188 CWHdm 18.4 Old forest representation 188 CWHvm1 10.5 189 CWHxm2 114.3 Recruitment, Surge Narrows Park, shoreline 190 CWHxm2 112.4 Recruitment, small island, Rendezvous Island South Park 192 CWHvm1 18.5 Old forest representation 193 CWHmm1 5.5 Old forest representation 193 CWHxm2 0.1 194 CWHvm1 4.4 Recruitment 195 CWHdm 3.5 Old forest representation, recruitment
Cortes LU SRMP 17 2012
Appendix II: List of Acronyms
AAC Allowable Annual Cut BEC Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification BEO Biodiversity Emphasis Option CFLB Crown Forest Land Base FIA Forest Investment Account FPC Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act FRPA Forest and Range Practices Act ILMB Integrated Land Management Bureau LU Landscape Unit LUPG Landscape Unit Planning Guide MAL Ministry of Agriculture and Lands MEM Ministry of Energy and Mines MFLNRO Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations MOE Ministry of Environment MFR Ministry of Forests and Range NC Non-Contributing NDT Natural Disturbance Type, see Biodiversity Guidebook OGMA Old Growth Management Area THLB Timber Harvesting Land Base WTP Wildlife Tree Patch WTR Wildlife Tree Retention
Cortes LU SRMP 18 2012
Appendix III Consultation Summary
A notification letter was sent to all First Nations with traditional territory within the Cortes Landscape Unit on October 9, 2009 to inform that the project was being initiated. Advertising was placed in the following publications: BC Gazette (July 7, 2011), Campbell River Mirror (July 8, 2011), Powell River Peak (July 6, 2011), Sunshine Coast Reporter (July 8, 2011). The public and First Nations consultation period was set for July 15, 2011 to September 15, 2011. No comments were received from First Nations on the proposed OGMAs and legal order during the concurrent 60 day public review and comment and First Nation consultation period. No objections or comments requiring revisions to the plan were received from the public.
Cortes LU Plan 19 2012
Appendix E Old‐Growth Management Areas Order
K E E S R K C W u C R MT S OGMAs in Brittain Landscape Unit T E A E N H ALBERT L K W I W K U O A Q R B O m R I L I M i R E D J F V CWHvm1 J L C A R E E
E R K CMAunp CWHvm1 Princess CMAunp M#T ALFRED K E E R C N N Louisa MHmm2 A M M#T S CWHvm1 U HELENA A L Q u In R e K CMAunp CWHvm2 e E E E n R C V s O MT A#LICE r T K A I E C R T C E E O CWHvm1 N E R C 160 MALIBU P A K R # R L CMAunp 161 L E 167 R I t 2 M N 7 A 5 C 8 6 e M L i S a 12 138 n c MHmm1 h R a D CWHvm1 E
136 135 V CWHvm1 16 M#T E m WELLINGTON I T R S 24 D I V R R E N E 26 CWHvm1
I E T MHmm1 D R R A E T 54 S 28 SS T E I 55 M K E 53 E E DD R CMAunp 50 A B R E N C I M#T 139 58 T ARTHUR E R L 33 JERVIS 56 C 31 164 P R P D E 32 A E B 62 A T L K CMAunp CMAunp 64 R BEART#OOTH s B E 61 C A MTN CMAunp A R T E O u S O T Brittain H H a 35 T # L C 45 142 S R Landscape Unit h U 69 B U E 73 C C L R MT FRE#DERICK A E H A E d R K S WILLIAM H 74 E E E R 83 D S 140 i E K INLET I K GOAT MTN # 154 47 141 C I R CMAunp 162 S E 78 O T CE A S Kr T S K 80 G 39 A t 163 MHmm1 T O W 147 h a CMAunp O U D A c S k Goat OVERLOOK # MTN C R a C a I E R L CWHvm1 E w E e 148 146 N E K R K u s CWHvm2 93 88 R E l V I 168 MT CWHvm1 R # 92 a CAMBRIDGE y D TO#MS THUMB E 144 o R D 165 90 R L THE HUMP R E # THE HUMP #
s C s 169 e r SKW# IM c MTN 150 n 96 i CMAunp CMAunp G F r L A R E C D P I A A CMAunp T R E T H CMAunp C CMAunp 97 C L CWHvm2 R R E DIA#DEM 98 E E E C MTN 100 K K R E
E Jervis K MHmm1 #
166 CMAunp MHmm1 K Inlet E M#T CHURCHILL E R CMAunp C
Dodd MHmm1 CMAunp H
L G 105 I L CWHvm2 H R r 104 E O 106 C V R CWHvm2 U O 109 CMAunp I CMAunp C CMAunp N a 112 CWHvm1 V A S
d
e 170 MHmm1 H r O R K R 114 E S E
E F CWHdm R
S C 117 JERVIS H
T O
A Horseshoe H E Khartoun 171 CMAunp R W R E K I V V M#T C I L o 121 E 118 CALDER I R R L MHmm1 H CMAunp CWHvm2 C E P I t E R N K E O T R h T O 119 S Z T S C K R C E E a E A R E K N C I L 122 L F R E R O m E N CWHvm2 I V e E R a k 129 C S L CWHdm I R 126 125 O E 123 L E 128 I K S s CWHvm1 d INLET i CMAunp N CWHvm2 CWHvm2 O'CON#NELLS o HILL T R O
E
L A T O C CWHvm2 MHmm1 R T Y 76 E E S K Z O
M#T N
TROUBRIDGE C 22 R CMAunp T E CWHvm2 E CMAunp K MT L#OUIE M#T E K SUMNER E R CMAunp C Captain MHmm1 Y K R E E T I CMAunp E T R L t C A E
S L A LANG B e AY SALTERY BAY K CMAunp N S E MT D#REW O CWHxm1 N k E o R l M I o C A R k E u L n m R S E A Datta Sourrces and Nottes I c V h I E R u J Bute West Layer Name (Source): Key Map
Legend Bute East
OGMA Wildlife Habitat Areas - Approved
Scale: 1:60,000 Cortes Ü Biogeoclimatic Zones Grizzly Bear Winter Range Brittain
Prroducced fforr:: Landscape Unit Area Ungulate Winter Range - Approved Powell River
Soutth Coastt Regiion Comox Ferry Route Goat Winter Range !( Prroducced byy:: Howe Road Ocean or Lake , Vancouver (! Nanaimo Miiniisttrry off Forrestts,, Lands and River or Stream Parks and Protected Areas (! Natturrall Resourrce Operrattiions
FileName:May 17, 2012 Heather MacKnight Date: Projection/Datum: Albers Nad83 Date: May 17, 2012 Regional Executive Director Prepared by: LG South Coast Region V OGMAs in Bute East Landscal pe Unit E E R MHmm2 284 CMAunp CWHms1 295 S CMAunp MHmm2 O 72 U MHmm2 T 77 76 H CWHms1 M#T RODNEY G 86 87 79 3 5 A 84 80 T MHmm292 90 6 8 E 91 9 285
95 12
97 14 I MT S#MITH c 16 I 99 C e 20 E w 19 W 100 A MHmm2 Bear 22 21 La L CWHms1 SUPERB l C # MTN Rl B E CWHds1 1001 E 388 K 288
101 MT# SIR 103 102 FRANCIS DRAKE 104 MHmm2 C
r
107 23 407 999 27 K 28 108 R E E 109 C H S110 31 M E L L E R 34 111 MHmm2 40 46 43 47 113 409 406 1001 45 44 48 KULA#KULA 283 114 PEAK 49 115 116 50 998 53 55 121 57 117 CMAunp 63 60 NANITCH CWHms1 TOLO MTN # 59 61 # PEAK CMAunp 123 62 MHmm2 GRANITE # 124 T 66 TAHUMMING PEAK MTN 67 E I V R 65 71 125 1004 70 R 393 72 73 Bute West MAM#OOK PEAK 303 CWHvm2 75 Landscape Unit 77 78 87 997 69 81 76 92 130 E 85 84 CWHvm2 P 79 E R O V 127 131 82 R F O R D R I 133 132 A 90 89 94 R 138 96 102 101 D 103 A 106 105 MHmm1 410 1005 109 L 107 108 R 110 D 404 111 Toba 142 112 1003 O 114 I 122 118 MHmm2 Landscape Unit 113 405 F115117 CWHms1 120 132 S CWHvm1 R 130 145 129
E 138 136 141 N 131 135 O 146 133 144 CMAunp 148 139 Bute East 142 140 150 145 147 151 MHmm1 146 Landscape Unit 149 144 153 156 154 155 158 152 403 158 157 302 160 159 162 I 165 T CWHvm1 159 164 166 160 173 163 176 A R 402 164 MHmm1 168 H 165 I 184 166 186 U 167 V 185 168 188 M 169 CWHvm2 E 172 173 191 M 170 193 176 171 178 R 192 195 I 174 197 L G A R N 180 182 A D 188 19187192 185 206 G 183 C 207 184 189 190 175 R 209 197 193 201 1002 E 202 198 20E8 401 205 194 204 207 K 210 Toba 203 209 206 205 213 210 208 200 211 213 212 Landscape Unit r 215 214 215 214 217 224 224 CMAunp 220 223 K C 222 Orford 227 E CMAunp 227 D 225 E 231 R CWHdm U 230 B C P 232 241 238 239 242 240 400 O 249 248 232 229 N 244 246 250 MHmm1 N 245 O 235 247 MHmm1 238 239 240 T 254 S 241 258 253
255 R 243 C 259 MHmm1 257 A
R 265 L 242 E h 269 279 270 271 272 278 245 E 248 CMAunp o 300 K 280 CWHvm2 292 CWHvm2 293 295 289 290 244 256 251 M 258 298 R 260 287 301 261 305 309 310 399307 263 304 322 319 CWHvm1 I 265 CWHvm2 264 318 308 324 314 325 V
272 327 274 MHmm1 329 E 271 CWHvm2 MHmm1 M O R H 277 276 R C R B R E M R I V E H E R 280 E E I L L K I S CWHvm1 279 333 C C 332 L 335 I 336 R P E P E 337 E T R K C R M E E E 341 K R 397 346 342 B U 347 CMAunp 350 CMAunp MT ELIZA 353 # B 354 CMAunp 357 358 360 361
363 364 CMAunp 368 369 408 CMAunp MT DO#OGIE MT # DOWLER R POWELL 370 375 372 MT 373 377 # E BARNER 379 378 380 383 381 V CWHvm2 387
I CMAunp
R T CWHvm1 CWHdm BREM RIVER E CMAunp FACE# MTN L CMAunp N CWHvm2 CWHvm1 I CWHvm1 R CMAunp T Z E MHmm1 a L A CMAunp CWHvm2 MHmm1CWHvm2 C m R
E s Datta Sourrces and Nottes E K A Bute West Layer Name (Source): Key Map
Legend Bute East
OGMA Wildlife Habitat Areas - Approved
Scale: 1:60,000 Cortes Ü Biogeoclimatic Zones Grizzly Bear Winter Range Brittain
Prroducced fforr:: Landscape Unit Area Ungulate Winter Range - Approved Powell River
Soutth Coastt Regiion Comox Ferry Route Goat Winter Range !( Prroducced byy:: Howe Road Ocean or Lake , Vancouver (! Nanaimo Miiniisttrry off Forrestts,, Lands and River or Stream Parks and Protected Areas (! Natturrall Resourrce Operrattiions
FileName:May 17, 2012 Heather MacKnight Date: Projection/Datum: Albers Nad83 Date: May 17, 2012 Regional Executive Director Prepared by: LG South Coast Region OGMAs in Bute West Landscape Unit A N H R I A N V E R R A UH Q A # A U MHmm2 Q E A E
T T
H
K CMAunp MT E#VANS E O E R R C S M I T H M
G INCI#SOR A R PEAK k A G E K a O Y L E C R E s T MHmm2 h H N K A O H E K Er R A C GALL#EON W A H K H C CUM#SACK A S MTN U PEAK Q C R A MT U E CRIDGE M N C R E E S T E O K C A G A L L MHmm2 R I D G C E K C R E C E K R CWHms1 E E K MT B#UTE 281 CMAunp r W R I V E C R D R a F F O d T A d S CMAunp 5 in R 6 H g SOUT#HGATE a to PEAK E rb n o V B u E r 289 A I R R 290 R 22 t R A I V E 18 30 R 32 E 299 o 27 B R 291 43 i 301 CWHms1 HO#USE 49 48 44 I MTN 53 l MHmm2 51 56 5752986 V l 60 58 292 E E 296 R CWHds1 284
295 MHmm2
E R I V E R 72 L
P
P 77 76 A M#T RODNEY 79 3 5 86 87 84 80 90 6 8 91 92 R 9 285 Bute West E Landscape Unit 12 V 95
D 97 14 I MT S#MITH 16
R R 99 20
100 19 O Bear 22 21 SUPERB # MTN
F B 1001 388 288 F
101 A MT# SIR 103 102 CWHms1 FRANCIS DRAKE 104 T CMAunp S
107 23 407 999 27 R K 28 E E E 108 C R 109 V H I 1S10 31 M E L L R 34 R E 111 S P I L 40 E L L I P H 43 P 113 409 406 P 1001 45 MHmm2 A 44 MT H#ENRY 283 114 49 115 116 50 998 121 117 CWHms1 60 CMAunp 59 61 63 R 123 62 E MHmm2 V GRA#NITE 124 T 66 PEAK E R I 65 67 V M I 125 1004 71 I 393 70 R
N R 72 73 K 75 303 CWHvm2 CWHms1 C 77 997 69 81 76 R CWHvm2 P 130 E 79 8584 E MHmm2 127 131 82 E A 133 132 K 90 89 94 R 138 96 102 103 A 101 D 106 105 MHmm1 410 1005 109 L 107 108 R 110 D 404 111 142 112 1003 O
I 115 114 122 118 W 113 405 F I C 117
K MT PRATT 120 S 132 S # L O 130 129 N R
A 145 C E T 138 136 141 N E R O E CMAunp 131 135 133 144 L 146 E K 148 139 142 140 L 150 E S 147 Bute Eas15t1145 MT R#EAD 146 149 C 144 153 R 156 151554 P 158 152 403 Landscape Unit 157 E 302 160 E 159 158 162 M#T K 165 SPARSHOTT I I 159 164 CWHvm1 166 160 163 173 L 176 CMAunp R 168 402 164 L MHmm1 MHmm1 165 I 184 I 166 186 167 V 185 H 168 188 169 E P 172171 173 191 170 193 176 178 R 192 195 174 197 L G A R 180 182 A D 188 191187192 206 185 CMAunp C 207 MT 184 183 190 175 R 209 # 197189 201 E OSMINGTON 193 1002 202 198 20E8 401 205 194 204 207 K 210 203 209 206 205 213 210 208 200 211 212 213 r 215 215 214 217 214 224 224 C 220 223 K 222 Orford 227 E 227 D E 225 231 R U 230 B C P 232 241 238 239 249 248 240 400 O 242 N 232 229 244 N 245 247 250 O 235 246 238 239 T S 240 241 254 258 253 CWHdm 255 R 243 C 252957 A
M#T R 265 L GARDINER 242 h E 279 CWHvm1 270 271 269 272 278 245 248 E CMAunp 244 o K 280 CMAunp 300 292 293 289 290 295 256 251 M 258 MT #VAN 298 DER EST 260 287 CWHvm2 301 309 GEORGE RIVER 261 305 319 CMAunp 310393907 263 304 322 308 324 264 265 CWHvm2 P K MHmm1 318 H E ILLIPS 266 314 325 MHmm1 E 270 R 327 C 271 272 AR 274 M Y 329 L E m I R S H M CMAunp O r H CWHvm2 R
277 276 C A R E H 280 E E I L L K I S 333 C o B a 279 C r s i 332 L 335 e n I R t P 336 s E P s E CWHvm1 E 337 E CMAunp R K p T C ESTERO BASIN CONSERVANCY R M CWHvm2 i E E E 341 K R l 397 346 342 B
l U 347 SA#N 350 i JOSEF MTN CMAunp MT ELIZA CMAunp 353 # TRE#BLE h CWHvm2 MTN B 354 K 357 P E 358 C R E 360
D O N 361 E G E 363 CMAunp 364 368 369 408 CMAunp R T O N C R E E K
Datta Sourrces and Nottes MT DOOGIE DOWLER R
Bute West Layer Name (Source): Key Map
Legend Bute East
OGMA Wildlife Habitat Areas - Approved
Scale: 1:70,000 Cortes Ü Biogeoclimatic Zones Grizzly Bear Winter Range Brittain
Prroducced fforr:: Landscape Unit Area Ungulate Winter Range - Approved Powell River
Soutth Coastt Regiion Comox Ferry Route Goat Winter Range !( Prroducced byy:: Howe Road Ocean or Lake , Vancouver (! Nanaimo Miiniisttrry off Forrestts,, Lands and River or Stream Parks and Protected Areas (! Natturrall Resourrce Operrattiions
FileName:May 17, 2012 Heather MacKnight Date: Projection/Datum: Albers Nad83 Date: May 17, 2012 Regional Executive Director Prepared by: LG South Coast Region K y E E OGMAs in Cortes LandscapA e Unit R C T M#T O A E MUEHLE U Q N T CWHvm1 I C
A CWHvm1 MHmm1 CMAunp R
B A I r G BAY MHmm1 MHmm1
THURSTON CWHvm1 m CWHvm2
MT STUART CMAunp TURNBULL CMAunp MT H#AYES ISLAND CWHvm2 MHmm1 M#T GRAZEBROOKE CMAunp B E N C R E E K R Y G
B C U A CWHvm1 R E . E T CHURCH CWHvm2 K S TOBA MTN # M#T CWHvm2 WHIELDON E K HOUSE R E C
Y P A 195 R R Y C E F C M a H O OWEN lm
1 C H 193 h L O BAY a CWHvm1 E 2 M 3 n F 4 n 192 N 194 N e 6 C H A R CWHvm2 l 8 7 CWHvm2 A H CWHmm1 11 OMFRAY CREEK 16 13 Y 15 MHmm1 19 14 21 22 MT AIKEN 20 CWHvm217 24 CWHvm2 18 GLOUC#ESTER 26 C MTN 23 29 CWHvm1 27 28 32 33 38 h M#T M#T CWHvm1 PERRITT CWHvm1 36 BUNSEN 41 34 a 42 MHmm1 46 MT MONK n # 44 190 47 48 L 55 L I S E E n 58 51 E C R
K 64 61 57 62 e 66 67 65 Forbes l 68 70 CWHxm2 B CWHvm1 C
72 CMAunp 189 M#T 75 73 79 H C CWHvm2 ADDENBROKE GRANIT CWHdm 81 E BAL Y E 86 83 71 A A S R URGE
C W R N E a CWHvm2 E NAR 84 R E E K K ROWS 90 C d MHmm1 M A K L 179 93 L U O O 92 91 e d 178 O 94 R w B M#T 98 89 CWHvm196 i O W is S H A D MAIN LAKE PARK WILLIAM n 97 CWHvm2 100 99 EVEN#ING g 102 DUDLEY MTN K CONE E t 101 E NIPPLE o R # 104 C SUMMIT n Y D 105 106 107 L L O 112 108 K E 117 C 113 E R C h 115 183 CL#IFF N PEAK CWHvm1 111 READ a O LLANOVER BOLD Cortes 121 119 118 # Y 188 MTN N HA'THAYIM MARINE PARK 187 n A Landscape Unit ISLAND C C 122 CWHvm1 POINT h n 177 123 a L n 124 e n M#T 125 e PARDOE E l ROSCOE BAY PARK l N 131 126 CWHvm2 130 129 128 180 132 N 135 133 134 D MHmm1 A 137 140 H 138 139 141 N 143 U 145 186 O 146 C 147 R 148 S E 150 V 153 I R
151 A E R C 155 176 AO S I M C E R C H R O D K E E H E K 157 T I N 181 REFUGE S SQUIRREL O O 170 M#T COVE I SPOONER D 160 GR#EEN MTN COVE T O 162 E WHALETOWN 182 A H HERIOT L DESOLATION SOUND MARINE PARK T 163 O BAY M#T 166 S WEAVER E CWHvm2 E L D
I
CWHxm1 T 167 MANSO U NS LA 168 NDING
S CORTES BAY MHmm1 QUATHIASKI O Smelt B B k LISS e ! C OVE o LANDING v YACULTA e
r
A I CWHvm2 P P n
L
E CAMPBELL RIVER T O O k e N S GWEND#OLINE o I v M HILLS e C M r R M#T S E PORTEOUS C E
R K E E K I e LUND n g a CAMPBELL CDFmm s s K E RIVER E a R C OCEAN GROVE W P O L L I W K 19 n E S C R E W O O D E R E C Sliammon K o N O LM Datta Sourrces and Nottes s M A I L
Bute West S Layer Name (Source): Key Map
Legend Bute East
OGMA Wildlife Habitat Areas - Approved
Scale: 1:60,000 Cortes Ü Biogeoclimatic Zones Grizzly Bear Winter Range Brittain
Prroducced fforr:: Landscape Unit Area Ungulate Winter Range - Approved Powell River
Soutth Coastt Regiion Comox Ferry Route Goat Winter Range !( Prroducced byy:: Howe Road Ocean or Lake , Vancouver (! Nanaimo Miiniisttrry off Forrestts,, Lands and River or Stream Parks and Protected Areas (! Natturrall Resourrce Operrattiions
FileName:May 17, 2012 Heather MacKnight Date: Projection/Datum: Albers Nad83 Date: May 17, 2012 Regional Executive Director Prepared by: LG South Coast Region T D A
E Q
M U
P A
S T
T C i E s R OGMAs in HoweR Landscape Unit M A s E E K w Lake C e R C R E E M#T U T H E o M O K E MURCHISON O N r K M r CMAunp K CWHvm2 E V E R E CWHvm2 S y I r M R CMAunp M#T R T I C RODERICK S S CWHvm2 CMAunp A Y MHmm1 U E M#T CWHvm1 M R DONALDSON W R A
E SQUAMISH CWHvm2 Y M W R A A P A Y I T C C L R E CWHvm2 C P L S M E I R ! K C L STAWAMUS r # E R CHIEF MTN
S E U CMAunp E K E CMAunp K S
K O O D F I E E W B R C R E CMAunp T r C L R S E C WoEodfibre H t E K G A H O N N l C CWHvm2 N O E Z N eS M#T S h A C e c L R HABRICH E E MHmm1 S E K C R L G E R U E F O C E R K E E 1 K T 3 E 2 4 MHmm1 5 278 THE L 7 # CMAunp COPILOT LED#GE # 8 MTN N 11 10 9 Britannia T 14 16 6 P I H 15 O O N 17 T BeaI cT hA N I A C R E R 18 B R E L K 22 M N N 20 21 A C T M#T E L MT SHEER H I N L # O A Y N C ELLESMERE E I R 28 286 S L H R 31 A 25 M L 32 M I 37 26 34 B 36 C 33 38 35 E L R V C 42 E 48 39 43 R D E R A A E 49 284 C I K 5504 53 E R 69 55 E S 46 59 R 44 45 66 65 61 63 Y 57 64 70 E C E C R E 40 68 72 E K 280 24 73 K E R 285 77 Minaty Bay E CMAunpMHmm1 K M#T 79 82 E TETRAH#EDRON VARLEY MT K # CWHvm1 K CMAunp PEAK WROTTESLEY C CMAunp 81 84 80 E M#T 88 L E K 85 282 E E STEELE 279 91 78 I R 86 R P C 93 A Y C P R 98 K G R 99 Y TETRAHEDRON PARK 106 R E 111 110 R E 115 U R 113 105 F 118 123 92 116 E C A R MHmm1 127 129 R E A N Y C 130 X C O O N E I B 131 132 133 C R 134 E P K E K H N CWHvm2 287 Y CWHvm2 138 N L
139 Y A 143 L
K CWHvm1 D 144 PANT#HER 147 149 I 146 S E 148 R 142 PEAK 150 K E E E 154 C O R MT 156 C # CMAunp CAPI#LANO MT R G # CRUCIL R MTN RICHARDSON 153 167 McNab 162 A 168 164 E C 169 B 165 Porteau E B E 174 170 173 K E H A Creek K A S N R L 180 I 177 L A I 182 H 187 N 183 N E V 184 181 C 188 R R E E K R K 190 186 C I 192 E E W S E 195 189 E K R E E D E M K R C LEAD#ING N C A R r C PEAK R R C 191 N O E S 196 N D N A I C E W A I DEEK#S APP#IAN CWHvm1 K M R PEAK K MTN P E 207 M#T A C E 209 R WINDSOR R H 285 Seas2i1d1 eE Park 200 D E E K S C E 277 R C H V E 213 K C A N O K K Ekins R 212 K E E E E CWHvm1 E E E MHmm1 E R C R Port Mellon 214 C R 281 K C 215 PoinRt C S n G A M B I E A S U K 220 L G Howe 216 E E N a E 219 218 I A R L O G G P N C CWHvm2217 E R S MT A Landscape Unit T A C R # D 2O23 E E K HANOVER m 222 K MT 221 I A LIDDELL HAT M#TN p 228 # 227 D 226 231 230 234 L 235 236 a K K E E BRUNSWICK 232 224 239 C R K # A E h CWHvm2 ) E MTN E M#T O O E R 242 KILLAM 241 N C H R C 245 A C E E K Y C R 283 ( O N 238 O N I A S M M A G N E S # L O I I N 240 K W E N K K E E ! E E A R R C E MT C M # A ARTABAN R T R C R E E K A L B E C H SECHELT K E T K L Y L ! H V E THE T E I CWHdm A R # E U LIONS E E O E M#T K R ELPHINSTONE S R R C E C H MHmm1 N MHmm1 LIONS BAYK S E E O T R SELMA S R C L T S I K E R E E A L M E N E W O N E New Brighton O I T B H D A S L S PARK E E O CWHdm L T C R R A K E R C N E E G E R D E Dav!is Bay A CWHdm R S K L ST. MARKS K E C C # SUMMIT R K C C K E E E E R A E K R G L K B E I D C E N E C B D E U M E N O K R C A O S S E A H A N Hopkins N CROWN C R C R E S O L E K C MTN SOA#MES E T R E N MT # E M N HILL W S # I O STRACHAN K Landing L H B CWHdm C O R C O K E L R E M#T E E A COLLINS HOLLYBURN LITTLE GOAT MTN K # R M MTN R E E Roberts Creek C K C DAM MTN CAR#MICHAEL CWHdm CYPRESS PARK PEAK Y C N E A ! BLACK W # K P O STO#NY MTN I C HILL N I R GIBSONS L C A N O K R E M K K I K E A Capilano V ! E E E K R E E R E E E R E C R B K R R R R R M#T C C C E E C RSESN HO HO GARDNER O L C E
K A O K S Lake Y R T R
C S E N S A I E H C I K E K BAY L E CWHxm1 D R C M E E E P E R E R A O N Y R E R K C C T T S M I C E U L C Q G R
A S E E S E O
R W VANCOUVER K M
E
G 1
D K V NORTH E O 99 E ! I R R N C Seymour S O G N VANCOGUVER A Landing C W CDFmm R
E
E
K R D B U R R A I N I T
!
O Datta Sourrces and Nottes
Bute West Layer Name (Source): Key Map
Legend Bute East
OGMA Wildlife Habitat Areas - Approved
Scale: 1:60,000 Cortes Ü Biogeoclimatic Zones Grizzly Bear Winter Range Brittain
Prroducced fforr:: Landscape Unit Area Ungulate Winter Range - Approved Powell River
Soutth Coastt Regiion Comox Ferry Route Goat Winter Range !( Prroducced byy:: Howe Road Ocean or Lake , Vancouver (! Nanaimo Miiniisttrry off Forrestts,, Lands and River or Stream Parks and Protected Areas (! Natturrall Resourrce Operrattiions
FileName:May 17, 2012 Heather MacKnight Date: Projection/Datum: Albers Nad83 Date: May 17, 2012 Regional Executive Director Prepared by: LG South Coast Region
Appendix F Wildlife Notices and Orders
NOTICE – INDICATORS OF THE AMOUNT, DISTRIBUTION AND ATTRIBUTES OF WILDLIFE HABITAT REQUIRED FOR THE SURVIVAL OF SPECIES AT RISK IN THE SUNSHINE COAST FOREST DISTRICT
This Notice is given under the authority of section 7(2) of the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation (B.C. Reg. 14/04) and 9(3) of the Woodlot Licence Planning and Practices Regulation (B.C. Reg. 21/04).
The following Notice includes indicators of the amount, distribution and attributes of wildlife habitat required for the survival of the species at risk outlined in Schedule 1.
Approved Wildlife Habitat Areas are not included in the indicators of amount, distribution and attributes for each of the species outlined in Schedule 1. As per section 7(3) of the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation, forest tenure holders are exempt from the obligation to specify a result or strategy in relation to the objective set out in section 7(1) of the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation, for approved Wildlife Habitat Areas.
This Notice applies to the Sunshine Coast Forest District.
Schedule 1
1) Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus)
Amount: 1. An amount equal to the total amount of currently suitable nesting habitat in the non- contributing landbase. Government policy for determining the amount of suitable nesting habitat is provided in the species account for Marbled Murrelet in the Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife (Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004); 2. An amount of suitable Marbled Murrelet nesting habitat within Old Growth Management Areas consistent with the direction from landscape unit planning; and 3. An amount of suitable nesting habitat to a maximum net mature timber harvesting landbase impact of 495 ha.
Distribution: 1. The amount of habitat referenced above must be distributed to provide: • areas of suitable nesting habitat of the size and spatial distribution identified in the species account for Marbled Murrelet in the Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife (Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004).
2. The areas described above are located within the biogeoclimatic units and preferred elevations identified in the species account for Marbled Murrelet in the Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife in the Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004.
Attributes:
Species: Marbled murrelet Attribute Characteristics Size Maintain a balanced range of patch sizes including a mix of large (>200 ha), medium (50-200 ha) and small (<50 ha) patches within managed forests. The area should include vertical canopy complexity, Tree Features Large branches or branches with deformities, and presence of mossy platforms Tree Species It is unlikely that Marbled murrelets select particular tree species, however certain species are more likely to provide large horizontal platforms suitable for nesting. This includes yellow cedar, western hemlock, Sitka spruce, Douglas-fir and western red cedar. Less likely species include mountain hemlock and amabilis fir. Nesting Habitat Suitable nesting habitat includes old seral stage coniferous forests, Features providing large trees with platforms (limbs or deformities >15cm diameter) with variable canopy structure and small gaps in the canopy. Readily nest on steep slopes but is not essential if forest canopies are non-uniform. Tree Size Most nesting trees in BC are >200 yr. Nest trees are typically >40 m tall and nest heights are typically >30 m. Nest limbs range in size from 15-74 cm diameter. Structural Stage 7: old forest (>250 yr - age class 9, but 8 is acceptable if older forest is not present and the age class 8 provides platform limbs and other nest attributes). Additional Table 3 of the IWMS Version 2004 species account for Marbled Murrelet information provides detailed information about the habitat features that are associated with most likely, moderately likely and least likely habitat within each of the Marbled Murrelet Conservation regions.
2) Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos)
Amount: 1. 4953 ha, not exceeding an impact to the mature timber harvesting landbase of 320 ha.
Distribution: 1. The amount of habitat referenced above must be distributed in the Sunshine Timber Supply Area to provide: • areas of suitable foraging and security habitat of the size and spatial distribution identified in the species account for Grizzly Bear in the Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife (Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004).
2
2. The areas described above are located within the biogeoclimatic units and preferred elevations identified in the species account for Grizzly Bear in the Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife (Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004).
Attributes:
Species: Grizzly Bear Attribute Characteristics Size 1-500 ha, depending on the area of use, extent of seasonal habitat and buffer size required. Critical patch Critical patch habitats include beaches and beach margins, estuaries, rich habitats non-forested fens, the edges of forested and non-forested bogs, herb- dominated patches on avalanche chutes with adjacent forest (particularly south-facing ones), herb-dominated subalpine parkland meadows, skunk cabbage swamps, floodplain ecosystems, and areas where bears fish for spawning salmon. Den cavities and surrounding stands are also considered critical. Non-forested critical habitats include a core area and buffer of forested cover. Forested critical habitats are not buffered. Denning Habitat Hibernating habitats tend to be high elevation areas that are sloped with dry, Features stable soil conditions that remain frozen throughout the winter. Dens are typically located on steep north-facing slopes, areas where vegetation will stabilize the den roof and where snow will accumulate for insulation. Dens are rarely re-used but Grizzly bears will often return to the same vicinity to dig new dens. Foraging Habitat Habitat selection is strongly influenced by meeting nutritional Features requirements, access to mates, thermal cover (i.e., dens), social interactions and the presence and activities of people. Habitat requirement vary greatly as some bears are more transient while others are more resident. Both residents and transients select patches or complexes of habitats within landscapes. Structural Stage Generally, foraging is more abundant in non-forested sites, sites with partial forest or sites with many tree gaps in older forest. Closed forest sites near quality habitat may be used for security and day bedding areas. Many or all structural stages can be used seasonally or for specific needs and as such, forage type is not necessarily tied to one particular structural stage. Elevation All elevations from sea level estuaries to high alpine meadows and talus slopes.
3) Vananda Creek Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus species 16 and 17)
Amount: 1. 678 ha, not exceeding an impact to the mature timber harvesting landbase of 237 ha.
Distribution: 1. The amount of habitat referenced above must be distributed to provide: • areas of suitable habitat of the size and spatial distribution identified in the species account for Vananda Creek Sticklebacks in the Accounts and Measures for
3
Managing Identified Wildlife (Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004). 2. The areas described above are located within the biogeoclimatic units and preferred elevations identified in the species account for Vananda Creek Sticklebacks in the Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife in the Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004.
Attributes:
Species: Vananda Creek Sticklebacks Attribute Characteristics This description is specific to Priest, Spectacle and Emily Lakes on Texada Island. Size The area should include a core area and a management zone. The size of the core area may be between 30-90m and include both sides of the stream. The size may vary depending on the risk of sedimentation derived from erosion events on land within the watershed to the lakes. The management zone should include crown forest lands that drain into the lakes up to the height of the land. Foraging Habitat Limnetic species feed in the open water, limnetic portions of the lake near Features the surface. Benthic species feed along the shallow margins of the lake. Breeding Habitat Both species move from the open or deep water portions of the lake to the Features more shallow, vegetated littoral zones where males contruct nests and breeding occurs. Limnetic males build nests on gravel or rock substrates, on submerged logs and at water depths no more than 1 m. Bethic males choose sites with aquatic vegetation in slightly deeper waters but rarely more than 2 m deep. Elevation Of the 3 known locations (Emily, Priest and Spectacle Lakes), the surface elevation of one site is ~40 m while the surface elevation of the other two sites are ~80 m.
4) “Queen Charlotte” Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis laingi)
Amount: 1. 1000 ha not exceeding an impact to the mature timber harvesting landbase of 213 ha.
Distribution: 1. The amount of habitat referenced above must be distributed to provide: • areas of suitable habitat of the size, spatial distribution and connectivity identified in the species account for “Queen Charlotte” Goshawk in the Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife (Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004). • areas of suitable breeding habitat to minimize overlap between goshawk home ranges (approximately 5-8 km separation). 2. The areas described above are located within the biogeoclimatic units and preferred elevations identified in the species account for “Queen Charlotte” Goshawk in the
4
Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife (Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004).
Attributes:
Species: Queen Charlotte Goshawk Attribute Characteristics Nesting and PFA Approximately 200 ha in size. Area Stand Features Structural stage 5-7 (>45yrs), multi-layered canopies, structurally diverse, (Nesting and PFA) canopy closure (greater than 50%), large diameter trees (for the locale), snags and course woody debris (CWD), typically not along forest/non- forest edges. Not near urban areas and generally on the lower 2/3 of slopes where slope gradient is <40%. Tree Species Western hemlock, Douglas fir, Sitka spruce, Western red cedar, amabilis fir (Nesting and PFA) and red alder. Structural Stage 5 (young forest - is used but is generally not preferred), 6 (mature forest) and 7 (old forest). Elevation Areas managed for nesting must generally be below 900 m. (Nesting and PFA)
5) Coastal Tailed Frog (Ascaphus truei)
Amount: 1. 30 ha not exceeding an impact to the mature timber harvesting landbase of 20 ha.
Distribution: 1. The amount of habitat referenced above must be distributed to provide: • areas of suitable habitat of the size and spatial distribution identified in the species account for Coastal Tailed Frog in the Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife (Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004). 2. The areas described above are located within the biogeoclimatic units and preferred elevations identified in the species account for Coastal Tailed Frog in the Accounts and Measures for Managing Identified Wildlife (Identified Wildlife Management Strategy Version 2004).
5
Attributes:
Species: Coastal Tailed Frog Attribute Characteristics Size Approximately 20 ha (depending on number and length of suitable stream reaches). Larger areas may be appropriate in watersheds with unstable terrain (class 4-5). Areas should include at least two streams or stream reaches (i.e., S4 to S6) with previous detections of tailed frogs. The area should include a 30 m core area buffered by a 20m management zone on both sides of occupied stream reaches. Habitat Attributes Tailed frog aquatic habitats are generally characterised by year round flow, non fish bearing (S4-S6), intermediate gradient (>2.5%), coarse substrates (>6.4 cm), stable channel beds and forest cover (generally associated with structural stage S6 or S7). Retain 100% of forest cover within the core area. Within the management zone maintain 70% basal area with appropriate structure to maintain riparian forest, important structural elements (e.g., coarse wood debris,) water quality and temperature (5 to 18 degrees), and naturally dispersed water flows. Elevation From sea level to 2140 m.
6
May 28, 2019 File: 36460-30/DSC
VIA EMAIL
To: Forest Act agreement holders
Re: Wildlife Habitat Area proposals to protect breeding habitat for Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis laingi) in the Sunshine Coast Natural Resource District (WHA 2-672 to 678)
I am writing to advise you of the commencement of a formal review and comment period for seven proposed Wildlife Habitat Area (WHAs) for Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis laingi) (hereafter NOGO) in the Sunshine Coast Natural Resource District (DSC). This designation is proposed by the British Columbia (BC) Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations & Rural Development (FLNRORD), under authority of the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) and the Oil and Gas Activities Act (OGAA). FLNRORD is able to establish WHAs under both the Government Actions Regulation (GAR) in FRPA and Environmental Protection Management Regulation (EPMR) in OGAA. You have been identified as a Forest Act agreement holder that may be affected by the Order establishing these WHAs.
The WHA proposals encompass approximately 1380.4 ha total area and are located on Crown land. The proposed WHAs are necessary to protect important breeding habitat for NOGO, which was assessed as “Threatened” in 2013 by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) and is listed on Schedule 1 of the federal Species at Risk Act. The cabinet approved provincial NOGO Implementation Plan was released in February, 2018 and represents the provincial management commitment for the species. The establishment of these WHAs for NOGO breeding habitat is consistent with the goals and objectives of the provincial NOGO Implementation Plan.
WHA designations under the GAR are managed according to specific management practices, known as general wildlife measures (GWMs). General wildlife measures regulate forest management practices partially or entirely within a WHA. GWMs may also be established to regulate range activities, but are not necessary in this case. GWMs proposed for this WHA are similar to GWMs previously established for NOGO WHAs elsewhere in coastal BC. Draft GWMs are listed in Appendix 1.
WHA designations under the EPMR are considered by the BC Oil and Gas Commission (OGC) among the suite of Government’s Environmental Objectives (GEOs) when adjudicating oil and gas activity permits. The GEOs guide the OGC in making determinations on permit applications and for permit conditions. Following the designation of a WHA, the OGC must consider whether or not oil and gas activities will have a material adverse effect on the ability of the wildlife habitat within the WHA to provide for the survival of the wildlife species for which the WHA was established.
Ministry of Forests, Resource Management Mailing/Location Address: Telephone: 604) 586-4400 Lands, Natural Resource South Coast Natural Resource Suite 200, 10428 - 153 St Operations and Rural Facsimile: (604) 586-4434 Region Development Surrey BC V3R 1E1 http://www.gov.bc.ca/for/
An overview map, digital shapefile, and supporting information for the proposed WHAs are available at the FTP site address below. ftp://ftp.geobc.gov.bc.ca/publish/Regional/Surrey/WHA/South_Coast_Northern_Goshawk/DSC/
The impact of the proposed WHAs on the mature timber harvesting landbase (THLB) is estimated to be 489.9 ha. Thus, the current planning requirement for the protection of 213 ha of the mature THLB for Northern Goshawk in DSC as defined in the Species at Risk Notice issued in 2004 under Section 7 of Forest Planning and Practices Regulation (FPPR) and Section 9 of the Woodlot Licence Planning and Practices Regulation (WLPPR) will ‘turn off’ following the establishment of these WHAs.
Where biologically defensible, the WHAs have been co-located with exisiting constrained areas (i.e., Ungulate Winter Range, other WHAs, and/or Old Growth Management Areas [OGMAs]), although this overlap was not extensive due to limitations outlined in the provincial Implementation Plan. The total area of overlap with existing constrained areas is 113.3 ha. The NOGO breeding habitat identified in WHA 2-678 is partially protected by Ambrose Lake Ecological Reserve; however, the nest area and some of the breeding area is located outside the park boundaries. Therefore, this new WHA is proposed to protect the nest area and spatially define and recognize the breeding area outside the park boundaries.
Prior to making a final determination for the establishment of these WHAs, FLNRORD is committed to meeting several regulatory tests set out in GAR (see Appendix 2). In each case, the decision maker must be satisfied that the applicable GAR test has been met. There are no similar tests under EPMR, but there is a notice and consultation requirement.
It is the intent of FLNRORD, through the consultation and review process specified in GAR Section 3, to elicit information from affected Forest Act agreement holders that will assist the decision maker when deliberating the tests outlined in GAR Section 2(1)(c). Specifically, we are requesting that you provide the following information in writing following your review:
1) If and how the WHA will have a material adverse impact on your delivered wood cost. 2) If and how the WHA will cause undue constraint on your ability to exercise your rights under your Forest Act agreement.
Please also provide comments in writing, expressing your support for this proposal (i.e., unconditional, conditional, or none). If you do not support this designation, please include the reason in your response. If FLNRORD is made aware that the Order may have a material adverse effect on your delivered wood costs or cause undue constraint on timber harvesting rights, then a consultation period will occur with the intent of addressing these concerns.
Considering that these WHAs are currently proposed and progressing through the formal designation process, voluntary compliance with this management direction is encouraged from the perspective of shared environmental stewardship. Given that these WHAs represent important
Page 2 of 6
habitat that supports a species at risk, I also encourage you to consider these habitats and wildlife values when planning future forestry activities in the species’ range.
I can be reached by email at [email protected] (preferred) or phone (604-586-5649) to discuss the proposed WHAs. If I do not hear back from you by July 7, 2019, I will assume you have no concerns and the proposed WHAs will be moved forward towards a determination.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Melanie Wilson, MSc, RP Bio Wildlife Biologist Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations & Rural Development South Coast Natural Resource Region
Page 3 of 6
Appendix 1. Proposed General Wildlife Measures (GWMs)
Access 1. Do not construct roads, trails, landings or stream crossings in the WHA.
Harvesting and Silviculture 2. Do not conduct timber harvesting or silviculture treatments, except as provide in GWM 3 3. GWM 2 does not apply where guyline anchors and tailholds are required to facilitate worker safety during adjacent timber harvesting. 4. Trees felled in accordance with GWM 3 or Section 2(3) of the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation that fall within a WHA must be retained on-site to provide coarse woody debris.
Pesticides 5. Do not use pesticides, except for herbicides to control invasive plants or noxious weeds, if applied by: a. stem injection, cut and paint, foliar wipe or other direct plant application; or b. spot spraying individual plants or a cluster of plants if direct plant application is not practicable.
Page 4 of 6
Appendix 2. Section 7 & 9 Species at Risk Notice and Government Actions Regulation (GAR) Tests
Section 7 & 9 Species at Risk Notice In December 2004 under Section 7(2) of the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation (FPPR) and Section 9(3) of the Woodlot Licence Planning and Practices Regulation (WLPPR), persons required to prepare a forest stewardship plan or woodlot licence plan were provided notification of indicators of the amount of area, distribution or areas and attributes of those areas required for the survival of species at risk, including Northern Goshawk, in the Sunshine Coast Natural Resource District. The notification triggered the requirement for a person preparing a forest stewardship plan or woodlot licence plan to specify results or strategies consistent with the objective set by government for wildlife in FPPR 7(1) and WLPPR 9(2). The Notice specific to Northern Goshawk, requires a strategy to maintain 213 ha of the mature THLB. Upon approval of these proposed WHAs, persons required to prepare a forest stewardship plan or woodlot licence plan will be exempted from the obligation to prepare results or strategies for Northern Goshawk, in the mature THLB in the Sunshine Coast Natural Resource District.
GAR Tests Section 9(2)(a): This section allows GWMs to be established if the decision maker is satisfied that the measure is necessary to protect or conserve the WHAs. Within the WHAs, proposed GWMs will describe management practices that are necessary to maintain a level of management appropriate for the conservation of this species at risk. The proposed GWMs are supported by the best available science. Since Northern Goshawk breeding success is largely dependent on coastal mature coniferous forests, and timber harvesting in those forests would eliminate the suitable nesting habitat, that activity is prohibited by the GWMs. Similarly, road construction is prohibited since it results in direct loss of habitat, and can fragment suitable breeding areas, increase access for nest predators that frequent edge environments, increase human disturbance, and increase hard edge effect (e.g., increase windthrow potential, change canopy microclimates). Use of pesticides is prohibited as a precautionary measure to avoid habitat modifications that might attract nest predators.
Section 9(2)(b): This section enables GWMs to be established if the decision maker is satisfied that FRPA or another enactment does not otherwise provide for that protection or conservation. While other regulations or enactments may deliver some protection of the proposed WHAs, those restrictions are not specific to Northern Goshawk and there is no certainty that the mechanism will provide ongoing protection.
Section 10(1): This section allows for WHAs to be established if the decision maker is satisfied that the area is necessary to meet the habitat requirements of the species at risk. These WHAs are necessary to protect the breeding habitat requirements of Northern Goshawk. It is widely accepted that forest harvesting and road building that result in loss and fragementation of nesting and foraging habitats is the primary threat to the species. In the South Coast Conservation Region, the long-term recovery goal of the provincial Implementation Plan and the federal Recovery Strategy is to protect 110 breeding areas, with a short-term goal of protecting 30 new breeding areas by 2020. The proposed WHAs will protect suitable breeding habitat that was verified through field surveys of known nest sites and confirmed to be recently occupied. These
Page 5 of 6
measures are intended to meet expectations outlined in the federal Recovery Strategy for Northern Goshawk and enable the province to demonstrate tangible progress in meeting its’ obligations to effectively protect critical habitat under the federal SARA.
Page 6 of 6
Appendix G Invasive Plants
FOR PURPOSES OF FRPA, THE PRESCRIBED SPECIES OF INVASIVE PLANTS ARE AS FOLLOWS (S.2 INVASIVE PLANTS REGULATION, 2004): Weed Species Scientific name Weed Species Scientific name Chrysanthemum Anchusa Anchusa officinalis Oxeye daisy leucanthemem Baby's breath Gypsophila paniculata Perennial pepperweed Lepidium latifolium Black knapweed Centaurea nigra Plumeless thistle Carduus acanthoides Blueweed Echium vulgare Puncture vine Tribulus terrestris Brown knapweed Centaurea jacea Purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria Bull thistle Cirsium vulgare Rush skeletonweed Chondrilla juncea Canada thistle Cirsium arvense Russian knapweed Acroptilon repens Common burdock Arctium minus Scentless chamomile Matricaria maritima Common tansy Tanacetum vulgare Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius Dalmatian toadflax Linaria dalmatica Scotch thistle Onopordum acanthium Diffuse knapweed Centaurea diffusa Spotted knapweed Centaurea maculosa Field scabious Knautia arvensis St. John's wort Hypericum perforatum Giant knotweed Polygonum sachalinense Sulphur cinquefoil Potentilla recta Gorse Ulex europaeus Tansy ragwort Senecio jacobaea Hoary alyssum Berteroa incana Teasel Dipsacus fullonum Hoary cress Cardaria draba Yellow Iris Iris pseudacorus Hound's‐tongue Cynoglossum officinale Yellow starthistle Centaurea solstitialis Japanese knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum Yellow toadflax Linaria vulgaris Leafy spurge Euphorbia esula Marsh thistle Cirsium palustre Meadow hawkweed Hieracium pilosella. Meadow knapweed Centaurea pratensis Nodding thistle Carduus nutans Orange hawkweed Hieracium aurantiacum
Of concern within the CFGP K4G in particular are Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) which is not indicated in the list above, but is also an introduced species that can aggressively spread, Scotch Broom (Cytisus scoparius). Measures are found under Section 10 within the FSP. Coastal ISC Priority Invasive Plant List (current to: April 21, 2016)
PREVENT These species are not known to occur in the region, but are likely to establish if introduced. Eradicate if found. REPORT ALL SIGHTINGS Plant Species Status Report To
Common Crupina Crupina vulgaris** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Cordgrass, Smooth Spartina alterniflora** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Hawkweed, Whiplash Hieracium flagellare Regional EDRR [email protected]
Knapweed, Russian Acroptilon repens Regional EDRR [email protected]
Kudzu Pueraria Montana** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Rush Skeleton weed Chondrilla juncea Regional EDRR [email protected]
Yellow Starthistle Centaurea solstitialis** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC ERADICATE These species are known to occur in limited distribution and low density. Eradicate if found. REPORT ALL SIGHTINGS Plant Species Status Report To
Blueweed, Echium vulgare Regional EDRR [email protected]
Buffalo Burr, Solanum rostratum Regional EDRR [email protected]
Common Reed, Phragmites australis** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Cordgrass, Dense-flowered Spartina densiflora** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Cordgrass, English Spartina anglica** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Cordgrass, Salt meadow Spartina patens** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Garlic Mustard Alliaria petiolata Regional EDRR [email protected]
Giant Hogweed Heracleum mantegazzianum (T) (N) Regional EDRR [email protected]
Giant Reed Arundo donax** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Hoary Alyssum Berteroa incana Regional EDRR [email protected]
Hoary Cress, Heart-pod Lepidium draba subsp. Draba Regional EDRR [email protected]
Lesser Celendine, Ficaria verna Regional EDRR [email protected]
Loosestrife, Garden (Yellow) Lysimachia vulgaris Regional EDRR [email protected]
Milk Thistle Silybum marianum (N) Regional EDRR [email protected]
Shiney Geranium, Geranium lucidum** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Slender False Brome, Brachypodium sylvaticum** Provincial EDRR Report A Weed BC
Sulfur cinquefoil Potentilla recta Regional EDRR [email protected]
Sweet Fennel Foeniculum vulgare Regional EDRR [email protected]
Wild Chervil Anthriscus sylvestris Regional EDRR [email protected]
1
Coastal ISC Priority Invasive Plant List (current to: April 21, 2016)
CONTAIN
These species have established infestation in portions of the region. Contain existing infestation and prevent spread to un-infested areas. Plant Species Carpet Burweed Soliva sessilis Hawkweed, Orange Hieracium aurantiacum Knapweed, Black Centaurea nigra Knapweed, Diffuse Centaurea diffusa (N) Knapweed, Meadow Centaurea pratensis Knapweed, Spotted Centaurea maculosa (B) (N) Knotweed, Bohemian Fallopia x bohemica (N) Knotweed, Giant Fallopia sachalinensis (N) Knotweed, Himalayan Polygonum polystachum (N) Knotweed, Japanese Fallopia japonica (N) Poison Hemlock Conium maculatum (T) Policemans Helmet/Himalayan Balsam Impatiens glandulifera Scotch Thistle Onopordum acanthium Yellow Flag Iris Iris pseudacorus (N) CONTROL Established infestations common and widespread throughout the Coastal ISC region. Focus control in high value conservation areas. Use biological control, if available, on a landscape scale. Plant Species Bur Chervil Anthriscus caucalis (N) Burdock Species Arctium spp. Canada Thistle Cirsium arvense (B) (N) Tansy, Common Tanacetum vulgare Teasel, Fuller's Dipsacus fullonum Dalmatian Toadflax Linaria dalmaticab (B) (N) English Holly Ilex aquifolium English Ivy Hedera helix Giant Mannagrass Glyceria maxima Hairy Cat's Ear Hypochaeris radicata Himalayan Blackberry Rubus armeniacus (discolor) Jimsonweed/Devil's Apple Datura stramonium (T) Periwinkle Species Vinca spp. Loosestrife, Purple Lythrum salicaria (B) (N) Scotch Broom Cytisus scoparius St. John's Wort Hypericum perforatum (B) Tansy Ragwort Senecio jacobaea (B) (N)
2
Coastal ISC Priority Invasive Plant List (current to: April 21, 2016)
CONTROL Established infestations common and widespread throughout the Coastal ISC region. Focus control in high value conservation areas. Use biological control, if available, on a landscape scale. Plant Species
Tansy Ragwort Senecio jacobaea (B) (N)
Butterfly Bush Buddleja davidii Daphne/Spurge-Laurel Daphne laureola (T) Gorse Ulex europaeus Eurasian Water-milfoil Myriophyllum spicatum Yellow Archangel Lamiastrum galiobdolon Hawkweed,Yellow Hieracium caespitosum
Supplemental Notes: • The above lists has been approved by the Coastal ISC Board and developed in consultation with key land managers in the Coastal ISC service area a the annual operational planning meeting (Februrary 2016). • The above lists reflect the entire Coastal ISC area. The placement of a species into a category at the landscape level is very likely to be different from a placement of a species into a category at the local level. • Provincial EDRR - provincially significant and are to be reported immediately to the province through Report-A-Weed.
• Regional EDRR - regionally significant species and to be reported to the Coastal ISC.
** BC Proposed Prohibited Weeds (PDF, February 2015)
(B) = Invasive plants with biological control agents available (T) = Invasive plants which pose potential human health and safety hazards
(N) = BC Weed Control Act, Regulated Noxious Weed in BC
3
Appendix H Correspondence & Referral Information
Due to the privacy concerns, this section will be kept on file and not shared as part of the public information.