DOCSLIB.ORG

Office of the Commercial Attache -Embassy of Belgium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Office of the Commercial Attache -Embassy of Belgium Republic of Serbia and Republic of Montenegro – NEWSLETTER June 2016 Belgrade, June 2016 Office of the Commercial Attache -Embassy of Belgium Our office represents the three regions of Belgium in Serbia and Montenegro and the three regional agencies specialized in foreign trade - Brussels Invest & Export (www.brussels-export.be ), Wallonia Foreign Trade and Investment Agency (www.awex.be ) and Flanders Investment and Trade (http://www.flandersinvestmentandtrade.com) Royal Embassy of the Kingdom of Belgium – Trade Representations www.brussels-in-serbia.com Beogradska 4 11000 Belgrade Serbia Phone ++ 381 11 308 55 70 Fax ++ 381 11 344 56 49 Email [email protected] Contents Marijana Milosevic Tufegdzic Economic Overview Serbia 2 Economic and Trade Counsellor Business News Serbia 6 Fairs -Serbia 11 This newsletter provides the latest business news from Serbia and from Montenegro, offers from Belgian companies as well as opportunities of Useful contacts -Serbia 13 these markets. Economic Overview Montenegro 14 Our intention is to provide you with updated market development news and opportunities, economic projections and demands that may ease your Business News - Montenegro 18 decision on the entrance to the Serbian and to the Montenegrin markets. Fairs and business networking gatherings are also provided with its dates Fairs –Montenegro 20 and places. Useful contacts-Montenegro 21 Useful contacts and links for more information are provided for your more profound analysis of the Serbian and Montenegrin markets’ trends. Our office remains at your disposal for all additional information. www.brussels-in-serbia.com Page 1 Republic of Serbia and Republic of Montenegro – NEWSLETTER June 2016 SERBIA Key macroeconomic indicators Q1 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Real GDP growth (in %)1) 5.9 5.4 -3.1 0.6 1.4 -1.0 2.6 -1.8 0.74 3.5 Consumer prices (in %, relative to the 11.0 8.6 6.6 10.3 7.0 12.2 2.2 1.7 1.5 0.6 same month a year earlier)2) NBS foreign exchange reserves 9,634 8,162 10,602 10,002 12,058 10,915 11,189 9,907 10,378 9,501 (in EUR million) Exports (in EUR million)3) 8,110 9,583 8,043 9,515 11,145 11,469 13,937 14,451 15,618 3,942⁶⁾ - growth rate in % compared - 18.2 -16.1 18.3 17.1 2.9 21.5 3.7 8.1 11.7 to a year earlier Imports (in EUR million)3) 15,468 18,267 13,099 14,244 16,487 16,992 17,782 18,096 18,899 4,513⁶⁾ - growth rate in % compared - 18.1 -28.3 8.7 15.7 3.1 4.7 1.8 4.4 1.7 to a year earlier 3) Current account balance (in EUR million) -5,474 -7,125 -2,032 -2,037 -3,656 -3,671 -2,098 -1,985 -1577 -249⁶⁾ as % of GDP -18.6 -21.1 -6.6 -6.8 -10.9 -11.6 -6.1 -6.0 -4.8 -3.3 Unemployment according to the Survey 18.1 13.6 16.1 19.2 23.0 23.9 22.1 19,2⁷⁾ 17.7 (in %) Wages 347.1 400.5 337.4 330.1 372.5 364.5 388.6 379.3 368.0 353.7 (average for the period, in EUR) RS budget deficit/surplus -1.6 -1.7 -3.2 -3.4 -4.0 -5.9 -5.2 -6.3 -2.9 -1.0 (in % of GDP)4) Consolidated fiscal result -1.9 -2.6 -4.4 -4.6 -4.8 -6.8 -5.5 -6.6 -3.8 -1.7 (in % of GDP)4) RS public debt, (central government, in 29.9 28.3 32.8 41.8 45.4 56.2 59.6 70.4 75.9 74.8 % of GDP) RSD/USD exchange rate 58.39 55.76 67.47 77.91 73.34 88.12 85.17 88.54 108.85 111.37 (period average) RSD/USD exchange rate 53.73 62.90 66.73 79.28 80.87 86.18 83.13 99.46 111.25 108.60 (end of period) RSD/EUR exchange rate 79.96 81.44 93.95 103.04 101.95 113.13 113.14 117.31 120.73 122.87 (period average) RSD/EUR exchange rate 79.24 88.60 95.89 105.50 104.64 113.72 114.64 120.96 121.63 122.92 (end of period) MEMORANDUM: 5) GDP (in EUR million) 29,452 33,705 30,655 29,766 33,424 31,683 34,263 33,319 32,908 7.522⁶⁾ . The real GDP growth in the first quarter of 2016, compared to the corresponding period of the previous year, amounted to 3.5%. According to seasonally adjusted GDP data, the economic performance increased by 1.6% in the first quarter of 2016, as compared to the previous quarter www.brussels-in-serbia.com Page 2 Republic of Serbia and Republic of Montenegro – NEWSLETTER June 2016 Foreign Trade January-March 2016 The overall external trade in the Republic of Serbia for the period January - March The major foreign trade partners in 2016 rose 4.3% to $ 7811.9 million compared to the same period 2015, expressed in exports in 01-03.2016 period were: EUR the overall external trade rose 6.2% to € 7061.0 million . - Italy (USD 562.3 million) - Germany (USD 466.2 million), -- The value of exports amounted to $ 3412.3 million, which was 9.2% increase when Bosnia and Herzegovina (USD 275.4 compared to the same period last year, while the value of imports amounted to million) $4399.6 million, which was 0.7% increase relative to the same period last year. - Russian Federation (USD 180.7 million) Expressed in Euros, the value of exports amounted to € 3084.4 million, which was the - Romania (USD 176.8 million) increase of 11.2%, compared to the same period last year. The value of imports - amounted to € 3976.6 million, which was 2.6% increase when compared to the same period last year. The major foreign trade partners in imports in the same period were: The deficit amounted to$ 987.2 million, which was a decrease of 20.4% in relation to - Germany (USD 560.2 million) the same period last year. The deficit expressed in Euros amounted to € 892.2 - Italy (USD 468 million) million, which was a decrease of 18.9% compared to the same period last year. - Russian Federation (USD 392.6 million) The export - import ratio equaled 77.6% and was higher if compared to the same - China (USD 387.2 million) period last year when it was 71.6%. -Hungary (USD 200.4 million) The most exported product groups were: European Union member countries -road vehicles (USD 439.4 million), account for 65.2% of total external -electrical machines and apparatus (USD 271.1 million) trade. -fruit and vegetables (USD 181 million) -cereals and produces thereof (USD 165 million) -non-ferrous metals (USD 152.4 million). These five sections accounted for 35.4% of the overall exports. The most imported product groups were -: road vehicles (USD 467.7 million) - oil and oil derivatives (USD 192.8 million) - natural gas (USD 142.6 million) - industrial machines for general use (USD 142.1 million ) and these accounted for 25.7% of the overall imports. Section of unclassified goods, now also involving customs storage goods and goods in free zone, has share of 17.5% in total imports. www.brussels-in-serbia.com Page 3 Republic of Serbia and Republic of Montenegro – NEWSLETTER June 2016 the export from Belgium to Serbia for the period of January – March 2016 rose 21.7% to €102.9 million, while the value of exports from Serbia to Belgium rose 35.7.7% to €48.8 million SERBIA BELGIUM (EXPORT – IMPORT January-March 2016) in € 000 Index 14/15 Export Import Export Import The most exported products to TOTAL (JANUARY –MARCH 2016 ) 48867 102942 135.7 121.7 Belgium from Serbia in the 0 LIVE STOCK AND FOOD mentioned period were 0 Live stock - 36 - 153.9 1 Meat and Meat preparations - 34 - 45.3 - Road vehicles - 278 - 91.5 - Vegetables and fruits 2 Milk and Milk preparations - Tobacco and tobacco products 3 Fish and seafood - Fibers, textiles, and textile 4 Grains and products 101 115 87.2 85.9 products 5 Vegetables and fruits 7221 874 125.1 62.5 - Medical and pharmaceutical 6 Sugar, sugar products and honey 298 217 - 101.7 products 8 716 - 157.9 - 7 Coffee, tea, cocoa and spices 8 Cattle feed (except wheat in granules) 61 278 48.4 53.2 9 Different products for feeding 101 253 17.6 53.1 1 BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO 11 Beverages 11 124 53.7 49.4 12 Tobacco and tobacco products 5434 16909 82.7 315.5 2 RAW MATERIALS EXCEPT FUELS 21 Leather and furs - 72 - - 22 Oiling seeds and fruits 420 0 691.2 2.5 23 Raw caoutchouc 60 482 - 137.6 24 Cork and wood 71 27 68.0 16.2 25 Paper and cellulose - 3 - - 26 Textile fibers and droppings - 2716 - 170.7 27 Raw fertilizers and minerals 0 20 966.7 * 28 Metal ores and metal scrap 41 - - - 29 Animal and herbal raw materials 27 1618 279.7 64.0 3 MINERAL FUELS AND LUBRICANTS 32 Coal - 7 - 202.0 33 Oil and oil derivate - 1449 0.0 129.4 34 Gas, natural and industrial 4 ANIMAL AND HERBAL OILS AND GREASES www.brussels-in-serbia.com Page 4 Republic of Serbia and Republic of Montenegro – NEWSLETTER June 2016 41 Animal and herbal oils and fats - 4 - 28.7 42 Animal and herbal oils and fats, solid 397 10 * - Animal and herbal oils and fats, 43 processed 5 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 51 Organic chemical products 0 721 - 62.2 0 153 8.7 160.0 52 Non-organic chemical products 53 Products for coloring 1 660 - 126.2 54 Medical and pharmaceutical products 1911 4384 57.4 64.1 Etheric oils, perfumes, and toilet 174 513 38.4 72.0 The most imported to Serbia from 55 products Belgium in 01-03.2016 period - 134 - 13.8 were 56 Fertilizers (except raw ones) 57 Plastic materials in primary shapes 400 2761 216.6 37.7 58 Plastic mass in other shapes 90 875 114.4 145.1 Chemical materials and products, 98 3494 59.8 63.2 - Road vehicles 59 unmentioned - Tobacco and tobacco products 61 Leather, products of leather and fur 1380 0 235.7 0.3 - Medical and 251 941 69.3 244.5 pharmaceutical 62 Caoutchouc products products 63 Products of cork and wood 1011 82 103.3 40.3 - Chemical materials Paper, cardboard and cellulose 463 291 131.6 91.0 and products 64 products - Plastic materials in 65 Fibers, textiles, and textile products 4161 1737 111.3 89.6 primary shapes 66 Products of nonmetal minerals 36 450 542.1 146.4 112 786 6.2 43.9 67 Steel and iron 68 Non-ferrous metals 430 296 24.9 35.0 2663 445 146.5 70.3 69 Metal products, non-mentioned
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elections in the Western Balkans: Fragile Progress in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia
    Elections in the Western Balkans: Fragile Progress in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia Graduate Policy Workshop January 2017 Authors Edward Atkinson, Nicholas Collins, Aparna Krishnamurthy, Mae Lindsey, Yanchuan Liu, David Logan, Ken Sofer, Aditya Sriraman, Francisco Varela Sandoval Advisor Jeff Fischer CONTENTS About the WWS Graduate Policy Workshop ........................................................................................iv Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................................iv Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Albania ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background and Context .................................................................................................................. 2 Description of Electoral and Political Processes and Institutions ................................................... 3 Electoral and Political Issues ............................................................................................................ 4 Electoral Process Vulnerabilities .......................................................................................................................... 4 Political Process Vulnerabilities ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Koštunica Has Chances to Remain Prime-Minister of Serbia
    Working Paper Research Unit EU Integration Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Dušan Reljiü Koštunica has chances to remain prime-minister of Serbia Working papers are papers in the subject area of a Research Unit, which are not officially published by SWP. These papers are either preliminary studies that later become papers pub- lished by SWP or papers that are published elsewhere. Your comments are always welcome. Ludwigkirchplatz 3ñ4 10719 Berlin Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] Working Paper FG 2, 2007/ 03, January 2007 SWP Berlin Dušan ReljiĀ SWP Berlin EU External Relations Research Unit 22 January 2007 Koštunica has chances to remain prime-minister of Serbia Source: Centre for Free Elections and Democracy, Belgrade Although his Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) suffered losses at the parliamentary elections on 21 January 2007, incumbent Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica has some chances of remaining at the helm of Serbia’s government. The most probable coalition for a future government would include DSS, Serbia’s president Boris TadiĀ's Democratic Party (DS) and the liberal G17 party of acting finance minister Mlaʼnan DinkiĀ. Although DS with 65 mandates is the strongest of the three potential partners, Koštunica could claim that his DSS and G17, which were allied in the government since 2004, have together (47+19) one mandate more (66) and therefore should fill the premier’s slot. TadiĀ is not likely to gather enough mandates for an alternative coalition, so that he would have difficulties to cope with such demands.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTER to G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
    LETTER TO G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS We write to call for urgent action to address the global education emergency triggered by Covid-19. With over 1 billion children still out of school because of the lockdown, there is now a real and present danger that the public health crisis will create a COVID generation who lose out on schooling and whose opportunities are permanently damaged. While the more fortunate have had access to alternatives, the world’s poorest children have been locked out of learning, denied internet access, and with the loss of free school meals - once a lifeline for 300 million boys and girls – hunger has grown. An immediate concern, as we bring the lockdown to an end, is the fate of an estimated 30 million children who according to UNESCO may never return to school. For these, the world’s least advantaged children, education is often the only escape from poverty - a route that is in danger of closing. Many of these children are adolescent girls for whom being in school is the best defence against forced marriage and the best hope for a life of expanded opportunity. Many more are young children who risk being forced into exploitative and dangerous labour. And because education is linked to progress in virtually every area of human development – from child survival to maternal health, gender equality, job creation and inclusive economic growth – the education emergency will undermine the prospects for achieving all our 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and potentially set back progress on gender equity by years.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ Timeline of the 21 Century
    LGBTQ Timeline of the 21 st Century 2001 Same-sex marriages laws : o Came into effect : The Netherlands (with joint adoption) Civil Union/Registered Partnership laws : o Came into effect : Germany (without adoption until Oct 2004, then with step-adoption only) o Passed : Finland (without joint adoption until May 2009, then with step-adoption) Limited Partnership laws : o Passed and Came into effect : Portugal (without joint adoption) (replaced with marriage in 2010) o Came into effect : Swiss canton of Geneva (without joint adoption) Anti-discrimination legislation : US states of Rhode Island (private sector, gender identity) and Maryland (private sector, sexual orientation) Equalization of age of consent : Albania , Estonia , Liechtenstein and United Kingdom . Repeal of Sodomy laws : US state of Arizona Decriminalisation of homosexuality : the rest of the United Kingdom's territories [citation needed ] Homosexuality no longer an illness : China Marches and Prides : Protesters disrupt the first Pride march in the Serbian city of Belgrade The first memorial in the United States honoring LGBT veterans was dedicated in Desert Memorial Park , Cathedral City, California. [1] Helene Faasen and Anne-Marie Thus , from the Netherlands, became the first two women to legally marry. [2] 2002 Civil Union/Registered Partnership laws : o Passed and Came into effect : Canadian province of Quebec (with joint adoption) o Came into effect : Finland (without joint adoption until May 2009, then with step-adoption) o Passed : Argentinian city of
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code RS21568 Updated February 2, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Serbia and Montenegro Union: Prospects and Policy Implications Julie Kim Specialist in International Relations Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary Among the many policy challenges currently or imminently facing Serbia and Montenegro, such as the issue of cooperation on war crimes and the future status of Kosovo, remains the question of the future of the state itself, the Serbia and Montenegro Union. Replacing the “Federal Republic of Yugoslavia” in February 2003, the union kept Serbia and Montenegro together in a highly decentralized but joint state under a deal brokered by the European Union (EU). Continued stark differences between the two republics and their respective governments have held up consolidation of the union and have contributed to a stalemate in relations with the EU. The long-term future of the Serbia and Montenegro union remains in doubt and could complicate international efforts to address unresolved problems in the region. This report may be updated as events warrant. For additional information, see CRS Report RL30371, Serbia and Montenegro: Current Situation and U.S. Policy. Introduction On February 4, 2003, a new common state of Serbia and Montenegro came into being, replacing the bi-republic Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). The event quietly marked the culmination of intensive European Union-led efforts to negotiate the continuation of a common state, as well as the start of a process to implement and develop the blueprint for the new, highly decentralized state. The agreement to keep Serbia and Montenegro a single international entity was initially viewed as a foreign policy success for Javier Solana, the EU’s common foreign policy representative.
    [Show full text]
  • Experts React: Aleksandar Vučić Wins Serbia's Presidential Election
    Experts react: Aleksandar Vučić wins Serbia’s presidential election blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/04/03/experts-react-aleksandar-vucic-wins-serbias-presidential-election/ 03/04/2017 Serbia held a presidential election on 2 April, with Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić projected to have won the contest in the first round. We asked some of our contributors for their response to the election, what the result means for Vučić, and where it leaves the country moving forward. Dimitar Bechev: “Vučić’s election paves the way to the consolidation of a one-man regime in Serbia ” Eric Gordy: “The election was over before it began“ Sonja Avlijaš and Abel Bojar: “ The impact of ‘foreign intervention’ should not be overemphasised“ Tena Prelec: “Voters are split between two distinct groups: pro- and anti-Vučić “ Marko Kmezić: “Democracy has barely taken root in Serbia“ Slobodan Tomić: “The opposition failed to rally around a single contender“ Dimitar Bechev: “Vučić’s election paves the way to the consolidation of a one-man regime in Serbia” Vučić’s election paves the way to the consolidation of a one-man regime in Serbia. It also turns the clock back to informal presidential rule, as practised under Milošević and later by Boris Tadić, despite the parliamentary model promulgated by successive constitutions. Externally, the new head of state’s big selling point will be predictability. To the EU, he promises reasonable relations with ex- Yugoslav neighbours. He may tone down tensions with Croatia, blaming the past crisis on the outgoing President, Tomislav Nikolić, and show good will toward Prishtina. Of course, with the important proviso that the EU turns a blind eye to what is going on inside Serbia in key areas such as the rule of law or media freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro (Including Kosovo) Country Report October 2003
    SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO (INCLUDING KOSOVO) COUNTRY REPORT OCTOBER 2003 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Serbia and Montenegro: October 2003 SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Contents Paragraph Ia Scope of Document 1.1 Ib Explanatory note 1.5 2 Geography 2.1 3.1 3 Economy 4.1 4 History 5 State structures 5.1 Constitution 5.1 Citizenship 5.4 Political system 5.7 SERBIA MONTENEGRO KOSOVO ANNEXES A - CHRONOLOGY B - POLITICAL PARTIES C - PROMINENT PEOPLE D - ABBREVIATIONS E - REFERENCES TO SOURCES Serbia and Montenegro: October 2003 1a SCOPE OF DOCUMENT I.1.1 This country report has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. I.1.2 The country report has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum / human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum / human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. I.1.3 The country report is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. These sources have been checked for currency, and as far as can be ascertained, remained relevant and up to date at the time the document was issued. I.1.4 It is intended to revise the country report on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro Union: Background and Pending Dissolution
    Order Code RS21568 Updated May 24, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Serbia and Montenegro Union: Background and Pending Dissolution Julie Kim Specialist in International Relations Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary On May 21, 2006, Montenegro held a long-awaited referendum on independence; 55.5% of the electorate voted in favor of independence, slightly over the 55% threshold established by the European Union (EU), and turnout exceeded 86%. Serbia and Montenegro were the last remnants of the former Yugoslavia to exist in a common state. They formed a new, highly decentralized state union under an agreement brokered by the EU in 2002-2003, which allowed for either republic to hold a referendum after three years. Serbia’s political leaders supported continuation of the union but recognized the referendum outcome. The impending dissolution of the Serbia and Montenegro union comes at the same time as the international community is conducting talks on the future status of Kosovo, a disputed province in Serbia. This report may be updated as events warrant. For additional information, see CRS Report RL30371, Serbia and Montenegro: Current Situation and U.S. Policy, by Steven Woehrel. Introduction On February 4, 2003, a new common state of Serbia and Montenegro replaced the bi-republic Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). The event quietly marked the culmination of intensive European Union-led efforts to negotiate the continuation of a common state, as well as the start of a process to implement and develop the blueprint for the new, highly decentralized state. The agreement to keep Serbia and Montenegro a single international entity was initially viewed as a foreign policy success for Javier Solana, the EU’s common foreign policy representative.
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Koning Abuzayd UN Under-Secretary
    Karen Koning Abuzayd Bertrand Badré UN Under-Secretary-General and Managing Director & Chief Financial Officer Commissioner-General for UNRWA of the World Bank (2013-2016) (2005-2010)¹ Gordon Bajnai Philippe Aghion Prime Minister of Hungary (2009-2010) Professor of Economics, Collège de France & London School of Economics (LSE) Jan Peter Balkenende Prime Minister of the Netherlands María Elena Agüero (2002-2010)² Secretary General of the WLA-Club de Madrid Ed Balls Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Masood Ahmed Families, United Kingdom (2007-2010); Chief President of the Center for Global Economic Adviser to the Treasury (1997-2004) Development; Director of the IMF Middle East and Central Asia Department (2008-2016) Professor Oriana Bandiera Director of STICERD & Professor of Esko Aho Economics, LSE Prime Minister of Finland (1991-1995)² Kaushik Basu Dr Shamshad Akhtar President of the International Economic UN Under Secretary-General and Executive Association; Chief Economist of the World Secretary of ESCAP & Assistant Bank Secretary-General at UN DESA (2013-2018); (2012-2016) Governor of the State Bank of Pakistan (2006-2009)¹ Carol Bellamy Executive Director of UNICEF (1995-2005)¹ Amat Alsoswa UN Assistant-Secretary-General and UNDP Professor Erik Berglöf Assistant Administrator and Regional Director Director of the Institute of Global Affairs, for the Arab States Bureau (2006-2012)¹ London School of Economics; Chief Economist of the EBRD (2006-2014) HE Dr Abdulaziz Altwaijri Director General of the Islamic Educational, Sali
    [Show full text]
  • Bharat School of Banking June Month Appointments-2017
    BHARAT SCHOOL OF BANKING JUNE MONTH APPOINTMENTS-2017 Appointments 1. New Indian Envoys Appointed - European Union and Belgium - Gaitri Issar Kumar. Italy- Reenat Sandhu. Denmark - Ajit Vinayak Gupte Slovania - Param Jit Mann South Africa - Ruchira Kamboj Greece - Shamma Jain 2. K G Karmakar and Gauri Shankar are appointed as Independent Directors of India Post Payments Bank (IPPB). Ashok Pal Singh is current CEO of IPPB. 3. 193 Member Nations Body UN General Assembly elected Slovakia's Miroslav Lajcak as president of 72nd UN General Assembly (commencing from September 12, 2017). 4. 38 year old Indian Origin Person Leo Varadkar has been elected as prime minister of Ireland. He ia also Ireland’s first gay prime minister. PM of Ireland is also called Taoiseach. 5. AA Pawar has been appointed as Director General Medical Services (Navy). 6. Actress Priyanka Chopra has been appointed as ambassador for government’s flagship Skill India campaign, implemented by National Skill Development Corporation. 7. Aleksandar Vucic has been appointed as President of Serbia. 8. Ana Brnabic has been appointed as Prime Minister of Serbia. 9. Automobile Firm Tata Motors appointed Girish Wagh as head of its Commercial Vehicle Business Unit. 10. Ayurveda physician Rajesh Kotecha has been appointed as special secretary in Ayush Ministry. 11. British PM Theresa May appointed Damian Green as her first secretary of state (Deputy prime minister of UK). 12. Ganeshan Neelakanta Iyer became first Indian to be nominated as a member of Umpires and Referees Committee (URC) by International Table Tennis Federation (ITTF). 13. Government appointed Rajesh V. Shah as Chairperson of National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT).
    [Show full text]
  • (1997-2008) Montek Singh Ahluwalia Deputy Chairman of The
    Bertie Ahern Taoiseach of the Republic of Ireland (1997-2008) Montek Singh Ahluwalia Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission of India (2004-2014) Masood Ahmed President of the Center for Global Development Edmond Alphandéry Minister of the Economy, Finances and Industry of France (1993-1995); Founder & Chairman of the Euro 50 Group HE Dr Abdulaziz Altwaijri Director General of the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1991-2019) Giuliano Amato Prime Minister of Italy (1992-1993; 2000-2001) Mohamed Amersi Founder & Chairman, The Amersi Foundation Louise Arbour UN Special Representative for International Migration; UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (2004-2008) Óscar Aria President of Costa Rica (2006-2010)¹ Shaukat Aziz Prime Minister of Pakistan (2004-2007)² Gordon Bajnai Prime Minister of Hungary (2009-2010) Jan Peter Balkenende Prime Minister of the Netherlands (2002-2010)¹ HE Joyce Banda President of Malawi (2012-2014)¹ Ehud Barak Prime Minister of Israel (1999-2001)³ Nicolás Ardito Barletta President of Panama (1984-1985) José Manuel Barroso Prime Minister of Portugal (2002-2004); President of the European Commission (2004-2014); Non-Executive Chairman of Goldman Sachs International¹ Kaushik Basu President of the International Economic Association; Chief Economist of the World Bank (2012-2016) Dr Deus Bazira Co-Director of the Center for Global Health Practice and Impact & Associate Professor of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center Marek Belka MEP Prime Minister of Poland (2004-2005); Deputy Prime
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Interviews on LGBTI Political Participation in the Western Balkans
    LGBTI POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN BALKANS RESEARCH REPORT March 2018 I This study was commissioned by Labris, the LGBTQ Victory Institute, and Hirschfeld-Eddy-Stiftung Collaborators The content of this material may be reproduced in whole or in part in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopied or other means, provided the source is cited, that the use is non-commercial and does not place additional restrictions on the material. The ideas and opinions expressed in this report are the sole responsibility of the authors and those persons interviewed and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Labris, the LGBTQ Victory Institute, or Hirschfeld-Eddy-Stiftung. II LGBTI POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Researcher & Author: Aleksandra Dimovska, MA Contributors: Aleksandra Dimovska, Subversive Front Antonio Mihajlov, Subversive Front Jelena Vasiljević, Labris Luis Abolafia Anguita, LGBTQ Victory Institute Caryn Viverito, LGBTQ Victory Institute Logan Graves, LGBTQ Victory Institute Design & Layout: Daniel Mitkovski ISBN: 978-608-65959-6-8 III Table of contents 1.INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. OVERALL OBJECTIVE OF THE RESEARCH PROJECT AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS ......................................... 3 1.2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 4 1.3. RESEARCH PAPER STRUCTURE ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]