AVDC - Proposed electoral wards

Note: 1. References to electorates relate to the projected electorates in 2019. 2. References to the parish wards relate to those which will come into effect for the elections in 2015 in accordance with the (Electoral Changes) Order 2012. 3. Wards are listed geographically from the north to the south of the District

Proposal No. and Projected No. of % electoral Commentary Ward name electorate 2019 members variance 2019

1. 5,358 2 +7 The current North ward has a variance of +14 % and the South ward North and a variance of +11%. Some adjustments must therefore be made to South Wards 5,426 2 +8 both wards to bring the number of electors represented by each councillor closer to the average which inevitably has an impact on one or more of the adjoining rural wards. It is felt that this can best be achieved by first transferring 143 electors in an area bordered by the river and Road including Fishers Field from the South to the North ward. Second 491 electors in an area to the north of Moreton Road including Whitehead Way, Hill Radnor, Lincoln etc at the northern edge of the town together with the land to the north of this development up to the town boundary are then added to the Luffield ward.

An alternative to address the electoral imbalance has been considered which would mean moving some 350 electors from the North Ward and some 150 electors from the South Ward into surrounding rural wards However there are not any housing areas on the edge of the South ward which could sit sensibly in any other adjoining ward and it would result in two or possibly three rural members representing small parts of the town in addition to the four members covering the North and South wards.

It is recognised that at present the River Ouse currently provides a strong and identifiable boundary between the North and South wards. However the change proposed only involves a minor divergence from the river and the area to be transferred is better related to the core of the town which is largely in the North ward.

2. 2,619 1 +4 This is one of the largest rural wards in terms of the number of parishes many of which have quite small electorates. The ward still comprises of Akeley, , Leckhampstead, with Luffield Abbey, , and Stowe parishes. In addition 491 electors at the northern edge of Buckingham Town close to Maids Moreton are added. is now included in the ward.

The A413 passes through Maids Moreton and serves other parishes in the ward to the north. Matters relating to circuit which straddles the /South boundary are of particular relevance to these parishes.

3. Tingewick 2672 1 +7 This ward is unchanged as there is a reasonable electoral variance. It is the largest rural ward with ten parishes namely , , , with , cum , , Tingewick, , and Westbury. Tingewick being the largest village provides a focal point.

4. 2,603 1 +4 The ward will be largely unchanged and will still consist of the parishes of , , Marsh Gibbon, , and Twyford. The electoral imbalance is addressed by transferring parish to the Steeple ward which will also improve the councillor/elector ratio in that ward. The shop and other facilities at Marsh Gibbon serve several of the other villages.

5. 2,478 1 -4 The ward is substantially the same as now including the , and Steeple Claydon parishes all of which have close connections notably through the church and the shopping and other facilities provided in the larger village of Steeple Claydon. Hillesden is included in the ward to improve the councillor/elector ratio. Hillesden parish adjoins Steeple Claydon parish and they have as much in common as most of the other local parishes.

6. Winslow 5,023 2 0 This ward which consists of Addington, , and Winslow parishes is unchanged. The A413 provides a good link between the communities and Winslow offers shopping and other facilities.

7. Great Horwood 2,676 1 +7 There is little change to this ward. Great Horwood, , Nash, Thornborough and Whaddon parishes remain together with the addition of Beachampton parish. The A421 provides a notable route through the ward and the parishes have similar characteristics and interests notably matters associated with the adjoining .

8. Newton 2,657 1 +6 and parishes will remain in this ward. The Longville development which is within parish is added to address the electoral imbalance in both this ward and the adjoining ward. The Newton Leys development is separate and quite distinct from Stoke Hammond village and immediately adjoins the boundary with Newton Longville parish.

9. Great Brickhill 2,558 1 +2 , Great Brickhill, and Stoke Hammond parishes (with the exception of the Newton Leys development) are kept together which form a distinct group on the edge of the District with boundaries with Central and Milton Keynes.

10. 2,712 1 +8 Dunton, , Stewkley and parishes remain in the ward. and Whitchurch parishes are added. The road links are primarily through connections to the A413. The centre of the ward is sparsely populated and residents of Creslow, Dunton and Hoggeston look to the larger villages for their facilities.

11. Wing 2,524 1 +1 Wing is large village of 2,245 electors and in the past has been a District Ward in its own right. The adjoining village of which is some 3 miles away has been added to the ward to improve the councillor/elector ratio. There is a road linking the two communities and Cublington similar to other surrounding villages use the shop and other facilities in Wing.

12. 2,408 1 -4 , and Wingrave with parishes remain in the ward. Slapton parish is added both to address the electoral variance and as a consequence of the warding changes to the , and wards. The ward remains centred on Wingrave and all four parishes border Wing.

13. Cheddington 2,570 1 +3 Cheddington and parishes remain in this ward. has to be added due to the configuration of the Edlesborough and Pitstone wards which gives a good councillor/elector ratio. The three villages are situated quite close to one another.

14. Pitstone 2,503 1 0 Pitstone parish with 2,503 electors now justifies a ward in it’s own right.

15. Edlesborough 2,401 1 -4 No changes are proposed to this ward which comprises Edlesborough parish (the villages of , Edlesborough and ) and the Ivinghoe Aston ward of Ivinghoe parish as the councillor/elector ratio is good. The possibility of keeping the whole of Ivinghoe parish together in one ward was explored but this was not achievable.

16. Brill 2,559 1 +2 Several of the current wards in this part of the District will have a high electoral imbalance in 2019. The composition of the new ward also impacts on the warding structure along the south west edge of the District. , , Ludgershall, Woodham and parishes remain together in the new ward and Brill is added to achieve a good councillor elector ratio. The larger villages of Brill and Grendon Underwood provide facilities for the other communities.

17. 2,533 1 +1 The ward includes the parishes of , , Oving, and Quainton which make up the current ward. parish is added to achieve a good councillor/elector ratio.

The ward keeps together parishes that are similar in nature and have common links. Granborough in particular has stronger connections with North Marston than any other parish.

18. 2,489 1 -1 , , , and Waddesdon parishes that make up the current ward will be kept together. and Westcott parishes are added to provide a good councillor/elector ratio.

The A41 runs through the north of the ward and traffic issues are of particular relevance to a number of communities. Facilities at Waddesdon serve most of the villages.

19. 5,027 2 0 The current ward which covers , , Long Crendon and parishes is enlarged to include , Chilton and Oakley parishes to improve the councillor /elector ratio. The parishes have a good geographical relationship, are well linked through the road network and have common interests being situated along the boundary with .

20. Haddenham 4,800 2 -4 This is a two member ward based on the large parish of Haddenham. The ward also comprises , Cuddington and parishes along with the area covered by the Ford polling district. Ford needs to be split from the remainder of Dinton with Ford and Upton parish to achieve a reasonable councillor/elector ratio in both this ward and the adjoining Stone Ward. Consequentially Dinton with Ford and Upton parish will need to be warded.

21. Stone 2,646 1 +6 This new ward consists of Dinton with Ford and Upton parish (excluding the area covered by the Ford polling district) and the Stone with Bishopstone and Hartwell parish. The latter has an electorate of 1,884 and it is felt that a dedicated single member ward works better in terms of representation and outweighs the splitting of Dinton with Ford and Upton parish or the retention of a three member ward covering both the Stone and Haddenham areas. Dinton, Upton and Stone are all impacted by the A418 and have close links.

22 and 23. The south east corner of the District which is covered currently by and these wards is very much self contained geographically with the District boundary on three sides. The electorate forecast justifies six councillors for the area as a whole but the current wards need to be changed to improve the councillor/elector ratio.

It is felt that two three member wards should be retained with a change to the boundary between them to address the electoral variance. However this is not without difficulty having regard to the electorates of the particular parishes and the community links between them. Two options are therefore put forward for consideration by the Commission as detailed below.

Other options have been explored but these are not favoured. The electorate in the current Wendover ward could be increased by splitting parish but it does not make sense geographically with it being difficult to establish a clear and sensible boundary in the village or if the properties along the Wendover Road are included largely separating village ward from the rest of the Aston Clinton ward. A split of Stoke Mandeville village ward has also been explored but this would divide the village when the parish already has four parish wards and is covered now by eight district councillors. Any pattern of two member wards would require either two of the parishes to be split or Wendover to be divided into three all covered by separate district and parish wards.

Option A

Wendover 7,613 3 +1 The Stoke Mandeville village ward of Stoke Mandeville parish is added in place of Halton parish which avoids the need to split any of the parishes further. In putting this forward it is recognised that Halton has particular links with Wendover notably with the RAF based at Halton parading through Wendover, Halton residents using the amenities in the larger village and public transport being available between the two villages. However Stoke Mandeville equally has links with Wendover sharing the same Police Division, Upper School and GP surgery. It also has good transport links on the A413 and Chiltern Rail with each village having a station. Aston Clinton, Buckland, and Weston Turville Aston Clinton 7,158 3 -5 parishes remain in this ward. Halton parish is added.

Option B

Wendover 7,462 3 -1 Wendover and Halton are kept together which reflect their linkages as explained above. Buckland, Drayton Beauchamp and (the southern part of Aston Clinton parish up to the B4009) then move to this ward. However there are equally strong reasons for not separating Chivery and Buckland and Drayton Beauchamp from Aston Clinton. This will necessitate the warding of Aston Clinton parish and put the three communities in a different ward when they have strong links. They share a united Benefice, use the amenities in Aston Clinton and participate fully in each others social activities.

This ward comprises Aston Clinton (minus Chivery), Stoke Aston Clinton 7,309 3 -3 Mandeville village ward of Stoke Mandeville parish and Weston Turville parish. 24. Oakfield and 7,835 3 +4 The ward covers the Oakfield North and South wards of Aylesbury parish, the whole of Bierton with Broughton parish and parish. The current Bierton and Oakfield wards have an electoral variance of +24% and -13% respectively in 2019 and the creation of a three member ward will give a good councillor/elector ratio. Substantial development known as Aylesbury East will be taking place in Bierton with Broughton parish with 860 dwellings due to be completed by 2019 as reflected in the electorate forecasts. A three member ward will help minimise the impact on the councillor/elector ratio as further development occurs after 2019.

The electorate of the current Bierton ward will be 3,107 in 2019 and for the Oakfield ward 4,361. Similar to the situation at Coldharbour any other option would require either further warding in Aylesbury parish or Bierton with Broughton parish without any apparent benefit.

The A418 connects Oakfield and Bierton and the proposed Stocklake link road will provide a major access from Oakfield Road into the new development. Oakfield and Bierton both have a range of community facilities and a lot more will be provided as the Aylesbury East development proceeds.

25. Watermead 2,416 1 -4 This ward just to the north of Aylesbury is based on Watermead and Weedon parish which has 1,840 electors and Hardwick and Weedon parishes. The communities are linked by the A413.

26. Elmhurst 4,810 2 -4 The ward would return two members and covers the Elmhurst ward of Aylesbury parish council. The A413 and A418 provide clearly defined boundaries. Elmhurst is a distinct community within the town which includes schools, shopping facilities, community centres and a park.

27. 5,129 2 +2 This two member ward is coterminous with the Bedgrove South ward of Aylesbury parish. It includes a substantial part of the Bedgrove development which has a range of local facilities including a community centre, park and shops.

28. Aylesbury 4,967 2 -1% A two member ward incorporating the Aylesbury town Central and Central and Walton parish wards will address the high electoral variance in the Walton current AVDC Central ward and achieve a good councillor/elector ratio. The A41 and A413 roads which radiate from the town centre provide notable boundaries for the south east part of the ward. A two member ward will enable broader and better representation of the centre of the town.

29. Mandeville and 7,043 3 -6 There are no changes to this ward which includes the Mandeville Elm Farm ward of Aylesbury parish together with the Stoke Grange and Stoke Leys wards of Stoke Mandeville. The ward retains a reasonable councillor/elector ratio and will continue to return three members.

The boundaries are largely defined by the A413 and the Aylesbury to Princes Risborough railway line and the ward forms a substantial part of the Aylesbury South East county electoral division.

30. 4,727 2 -6 Southcourt is a long established community within the town and a two member ward is retained. The Aylesbury to Princes Risborough railway line and the A418 provide very clear boundaries on three sides which are also those for the Aylesbury South West County electoral division.

An adjustment is made to the southern boundary to transfer 301 electors to and Hawkslade ward so as to improve the councillor/elector ratio in that ward. The new boundary runs down the middle of Churchill Avenue from the railway line to the junction with Grenville Road, it then follows the middle of Grenville Road to the junction with Hannon Road and then finally runs between the backs of the houses on Grenville Road and those on Evenlode and Plym Closes until it joins the existing boundary south of Nursery Close.

31. Walton Court 4,711 2 -6 There are two boundary changes to this two member ward which and Hawkslade includes the Walton Court and Hawkslade North and South wards of Aylesbury parish and the Hawkslade ward of Stoke Mandeville parish. The first is an adjustment to the northern boundary to transfer 301 electors into the ward (and the Walton Court and Hawkslade South parish ward) from the Southcourt ward so as to improve the councillor/elector ratio as mentioned above.

The other change is to the current boundary with the Coldharbour ward which runs along Lavric Road, although the flats on the Coldharbour side at the corner with Lavric Road are in Walton Court. At the time of the last boundary revision there was an empty field (former school site) between those flats and Russell Avenue and it made no material difference how the boundary was drawn around that field. Since then the Chestnuts Nursing Home (inc. Willow Court flats) has been built on part of that field and is, of course, in Coldharbour ward. However, it is not possible to reach the rest of Coldharbour ward from it, on foot or by road, without going through Walton Court ward. Thus, although not technically detached, it is in practice so and the boundary has been be redrawn around the other two sides of the field. This revision transfers 56 electors from the Coldharbour ward to the Walton Court and Hawkslade ward. 32. Coldharbour 6,930 3 -8 This has been kept as a three member ward incorporating as now Coldharbour parish and the Road ward of Aylesbury parish as the councillor/elector ratio remains reasonable. A small change is made to the boundary with the Walton Court and Hawkslade ward as described above.

The two areas have similar electorates (3,529 and 3,457 respectively) and any other option would require Coldharbour parish to be warded or further warding in Aylesbury parish without any apparent benefit.

This area forms a substantial part of the Aylesbury West County electoral division.

33. Gatehouse 4,866 2 -3 The most part of the north west of Aylesbury is covered by the Gatehouse and Riverside wards. These areas are distinct from the rest of the town and are in the same County electoral division. The current Gatehouse ward is extended westwards to include 542 electors from the existing ward. The ward boundary now runs down Meadowcroft to the junction with Road. It then follows a line to so as to include the whole of the Broadfields retail/commercial development within the Gatehouse Ward. More specifically the new boundary runs to the rear of Devereux Place and Intalbury Avenue then along the natural boundary between the rear of the commercial properties in Faraday Road and those in the Broadfields development continuing to the railway line and then turning along the railway line back to join the existing boundary line where the railway crosses Coldharbour Way/Griffin Lane.

There are also some boundary changes to the north east corner of the current Gatehouse ward to enable the creation of a new Holman’s Bridge ward as described below.

34. Riverside 7,873 3 +7 This ward which is largely based on the current Quarrendon ward covers the north west of the town along with the Gatehouse ward. The new boundary between these two wards is described above. The Riverside ward would be three member and includes Quarrendon parish where a major development known as is taking place on the edge of Aylesbury. The electorate in this parish is due to increase by over 4,000 by 2019. A three member ward will help minimise the impact on the councillor/elector ratio as further development occurs after 2019.

35. Holman’s 2,619 1 +4 This new single member ward covers the Buckingham Park parish Bridge and an adjoining area in Aylesbury town. Buckingham Park which has an electorate of 1,602 is insufficient to form a district ward on it’s own but it is felt that it would best form the basis of a single member ward rather than be incorporated in a larger three member Gatehouse ward.

The part of Aylesbury town included in the ward comprises the Savernake Road development (which is just across the river from Buckingham Park and is relatively modern build), one side of Meadowcroft (between Savernake Road and Weedon Road), part of Weedon Road (between the Meadowcroft junction on one side and the northern junction with Cromwell Avenue on the other and the Horse and Jockey) and Buckingham Road and roads off (including Whaddon Chase) north of the commercial development in Buckingham Road.

Electoral Review of Aylesbury Vale District

Submission by Aylesbury Vale District Council on new warding arrangements

1. Introduction

The Local Government Boundary Commission for (LGBCE) formally announced the start of the electoral review on 23 April 2013. In July it advised that it was minded to recommend that the Council should have 59 members in future, the same as now, in line with the wishes of the Council.

The LGBCE commenced consultation on ward boundaries based on a council size of 59 members on 23 July 2013 and the Council and others have the opportunity to submit proposals by 1 October 2013.The representations will then be analysed and the LGBCE will then prepare and consult on draft recommendations.

This submission which has been approved by the full Council proposes a warding structure which it is felt provides the best fit for the District as a whole.

2. Electorate

The following are the projected electorates for the District along with the figures showing the average representation needed per councillor based on a Council size of 59 Members. Detailed projections for each polling district have already been provided to the Commission.

Electorates 2013 2019

Total 137,208 147,939

Average per councillor 2,326 2,507

-10% variance 2,093 2,256

+10% variance 2,559 2,758

3. Warding proposals

The proposals for new wards have been developed in consultation with group leaders. They have taken into account the statutory criteria and the following considerations in particular in working up the proposals:

 The existing pattern of wards has been used as the base on which to develop the new warding structure as this has regard to community of interest and the number of councillors is to remain at 59. The need to achieve electoral equality has however inevitably required changes to the composition of most wards.

 The opportunity has been taken to create some new wards where this is felt to offer a better solution.

 Each Parish has been left as a single entity within one ward wherever this is realistically possible with any further warding of Parishes kept to a minimum.

 Single member wards have been created where these can sensibly be achieved.  It has been accepted that 2 or 3 member wards work best in some instances particularly in the towns where it would otherwise be necessary to split communities into smaller areas.

 Arrangements for how best the urban development around but outside Aylesbury Parish can be accommodated in the warding structure has been considered on a case by case basis.

 3 member wards are proposed for the two areas where there is to be the most significant growth in electorate.

 Ward names have been kept concise reflecting the larger parishes in the rural wards and names best linked with the local areas in the urban wards. In most instances current names have been retained.

 Two options have been put forward for addressing the electoral variance in the current Aston Clinton and Wendover wards..

The following documents describe the warding proposals:

Appendix 1 - An explanation of the new wards.

Appendix 2 – Maps showing the new wards.

Aylesbury Vale

L i ll in Lillingstone Lovell g L s to District Council u f n f e ie l D d a A y b r • b e l e l y w i th Biddlesden LUFFIELD ABBEY Akeley Leckhampstead Turweston Stowe Shalstone Beachampton Westbury

- Maids Moreton m Foscott u e Ward Boundaries r c Thornton Water Stratford - o e m v i k Draft District Ward Proposals l c c a TINGEWICK d h a C R BUCKINGHAM NORTH For consideration (Sept 2013) Buckingham Nash Whaddon Thornborough Proposed Ward Boundaries BUCKINGHAM SOUTH GREAT HORWOOD Tingewick AYLESBURY CENTRAL & WALTON BEDGROVE Newton Longville Gawcott with Lenborough BUCKINGHAM NORTH n Great Horwood r o h Great Brickhill s BUCKINGHAM SOUTH t r Adstock Little Horwood CP NEWTON LONGVILLE a Padbury H CHEDDINGTON n o t r a Stoke Hammond B COLDHARBOUR P Hillesden Mursley r Chetwode e Drayton Parslow EDLESBOROUGH s t WINSLOW o GREAT BRICKHILL n Addington ELMHURST B

i s s e GATEHOUSE t t Winslow Soulbury GREAT BRICKHILL Steeple Claydon Swanbourne GREAT HORWOOD STEEPLE CLAYDON Twyford BRILL Poundon Stewkley HADDENHAM East Claydon Granborough Middle Claydon Hoggeston MARSH GIBBON HOLMAN'S BRIDGE STEWKLEY Dunton Charndon LONG CRENDON C alv er LUFFIELD ABBEY t G re en MANDEVILLE & ELM FARM Hogshaw North Marston WING Marsh Gibbon Edgcott Cublington Wing MARSH GIBBON Oving QUAINTON Creslow NEWTON LONGVILLE OAKFIELD & BIERTON Grendon Underwood Slapton Whitchurch PITSTONE Quainton Mentmore Aston Abbotts QUAINTON Pitchcott Hardwick RIVERSIDE WINGRAVE Edlesborough K SOUTHCOURT in g Woodham s w WATERMEAD Wingrave with Rowsham o STEEPLE CLAYDON Ludgershall o EDLESBOROUGH d & WEEDON Cheddington STEWKLEY BRILL Weedon STONE Westcott F Quarrendon l Wotton Underwood e W e t a Hulcott Ivinghoe TINGEWICK

Waddesdon M RIVERSIDE te a rm r s e CHEDDINGTON WADDESDON t WADDESDON o a n 6 d Bierton with Broughton Marsworth WALTON COURT & HAWKSLADE Pitstone 8 WATERMEAD & WEEDON Brill PITSTONE Boarstall W 5 4 Ashendon i U C n p o c ld WINSLOW p h h e a Aylesbury Dorton e r r 7 D n b r d o a o u y WING r 1 t n o S 3 n to n B Nether Winchendon e 10 e WINGRAVE a w 2 ASTON CLINTON u a i B c n th h d u B a H i c m Existing wards subject a s 9 k r h l p t o Aston Clinton a w p 11 Weston Turville n to options for change Oakley Chilton e d STONE l s Cuddington l to n Chearsley e ASTON CLINTON Dinton-with-Ford Stoke Mandeville LONG CRENDON and Upton WENDOVER Worminghall Halton Long Crendon PROPOSED AVDC WARDS Haddenham AVDC PARISHES Ford HADDENHAM A st Ickford on Shabbington S an 1 Aylesbury Central & Walton df or Kingsey d WENDOVER 2 Bedgrove Wendover 3 Coldharbour 4 Elmhurst This map is based on Ordnance Survey material with the permission of 5 Gatehouse Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office (C) Crown copyright. 6 Holman's Bridge Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to 7 Oakfield & Bierton prosecution or civil proceedings. All rights reserved Aylesbury Vale District Council 100019797 2012 8 Riverside 9 Mandeville & Elm Farm Further detail has been added to this Ordnance Survey Map from sources held by A.V.D.C. No guarantee can be given as 10 Southcourt to the accuracy of this information. 11 Walton Court & Hawkslade Updated - September 2013 Located at :- Z:\Engineers\ELECTORAL REGISTRATION MAPS Scale :- \GeneralPurposesCommiteeAug13\AVDC All Wards ProposalsAug13.mxd 1:150,000 at A3 Aylesbury Vale District Council

WEEDON

QUARRENDON Aylesbury Town BIERTON District and Parish Wards Draft District Ward Proposals ELMHURST & WATERMEAD for consideration by Council (11th September 2013)

Key - to coloured areas AYLESBURY CENTRAL & WALTON GATEHOUSE BEDGROVE COLDHARBOUR ELMHURST GATEHOUSE HOLMAN'S BRIDGE

MANDEVILLE & ELM FARM OAKFIELD OAKFIELD & BIERTON

RIVERSIDE SOUTHCOURT AYLESBURY CENTRAL WALTON COURT & HAWKSLADE WATERMEAD COLDHARBOUR Parish Boundaries

Existing District Wards

OAKFIELD Names of existing wards

SOUTHCOURT BEDGROVE

HADDENHAM

MANDEVILLE & ELM FARM

WALTON COURT & HAWKSLADE ASTON CLINTON

This map is based on Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office (C) Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. All rights reserved Aylesbury Vale District Council 100019797 2013

Further detail has been added to this Ordnance Survey Map from sources held by A.V.D.C. No guarantee can be given as to the accuracy of this information.

Updated - August 2013 •

Located at :- Z:\Engineers\ELECTORAL REGISTRATION MAPS \GeneralPurposesCommiteeAug13\ AVDC AylesburyTownWardProposalsAug13.mxd Scale :- 1:15,000 at A2 S T O W E E A V V I T E R O D N U W T E C U

E N L S A T Aylesbury Vale E W R

R

O

A

D

D District Council A O R K E M T R A A N O P O C R R S P O O A F N R A K M

M A IN S TR RK E PA ET R NO MA AD RO E OT SC FO

E

K

A

L E

K N A C L U S E

D T S T O O C L S C H C R U H C

A V E N U LUFFIELD ABBEY E G R L O E D A B A D E O M O C R R L N E O O TO S T N E E D R R O IV TINGEWICK M E Buckingham Town District and Parish Wards Draft District Ward Proposals

W for consideration D A T A C O H S R C T R O S D O W F (August 2013) N T E A D D L OA A H R R V I RD G V FO E I E RAT N H ST U E D A O D R OA N D R H O R T FO O T E RA L R ST T O O M N

B R E O

E A C H D C L O S Key E

E U N E V A BUCKINGHAM NORTH N R E T S E O

A R 422 W C E HILL AVENUE BUCKINGHAM NORTH H PAG BUCKINGHAM SOUTH

A

R D

D A AD D O ING D R E TO N N LUFFIELD ABBEY N R O E D O AD PA A T GE O E H R IL D R L A VE R O NU FO M E T RA TINGEWICK ST A422 D A O R D WINSLOW R O T F N T E A C R S T E A42 S R 2 C Current District /Town N R C E V E O C M I Ward Boundaries L O S R E Y T A W O R N D E S R C T S O O A T R A42 O A N 4 2 W E D W 1 3 R A E L N L A S

V A L M L E V I T E B N A E H E D U U N T E O R E W E U R L K T E E R S I A G H H M G I P A4 H 22 IE C VE E BRACK R LEY RO N AD EY WEST STREET C LO SE

A

4

1 S 3 T D E L E E T B I R E R F T E E I S D E R G R E T E T L S S E T EL T ID S M L R ER D A S L E C L T E L T C R E T O E E E S I E W E E T F R

S T T S E R E E N R H O T

T E S S S I T R ING L LT C EW F

U ICK E EL E ROA E I D N O FO R P

W R T C D S S T H S RE L E G I L K T E

E V E O I

W R L O D

R

3 R D

U 1

B R

A B 4 BO L URT L A ON A E ROA M

N D

A

L T

E H BO E URTON ROA T D

R

A T B E S AD L O L K R R I C E WI V E T ING N N T O U T

H R

U

O B Y A

W BOURTON ROAD S D E A N I O A R D 4 A421 S R 1 O A 3 D N N A R H E C B Y A M W IT S A421 R R E E S G T D R A E B E T

L

A B R D D A A K A RO D ON O T G C UR R BO E L W T O R

I T A S S L 4 O E L W 1 C O 3 A A R W 4 W O Y 2 A 1 B D G I N R

I L C V

O L E O BUCKINGHAM SOUTH N S D E 1 O 42 N A

R O A D SE LO E C OS VE CL LO RE XG HA FO

AY S W ER DG BA Y A W E D M A B L E L E E M T N O B N O

W R A Y O 1 U A42 G H

R O A D

L O N 1 D 42 O A N R O A D

A421 E This map is based on Ordnance Survey material with the permission of AD SL EAT Y GR Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary A W Office (C) Crown copyright. R E I S Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to O R Y OO prosecution or civil proceedings. WA M IER LL OS BA All rights reserved Aylesbury Vale District Council 100019797 2013 B A L L M O E N R D

C O Further detail has been added to this Ordnance Survey Map U N T

R from sources held by A.V.D.C. No guarantee can be given as D O A A O H D to the accuracy of this information. R I L T L T C

O R WINSLOW C E S W Updated - July 2013 T • A L E G W G N P A A TO Y Located at :- Z:\Engineers\ELECTORAL REGISTRATION MAPS OSI ER \GeneralPurposesCommiteeAug13 WAY Scale :- 1:8,500 at A2 AVDC BuckinghamTownWards Aug13.mxd D A O R M A H G IN K C U B