Diagnosis and Management of Dementia with Lewy Bodies Fourth Consensus Report of the DLB Consortium
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Published Ahead of Print on June 7, 2017 as 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004058 VIEWS & REVIEWS Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium Ian G. McKeith, MD, ABSTRACT F Med Sci The Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) Consortium has refined its recommendations about the Bradley F. Boeve, MD clinical and pathologic diagnosis of DLB, updating the previous report, which has been in wide- Dennis W. Dickson, MD spread use for the last decade. The revised DLB consensus criteria now distinguish clearly Glenda Halliday, PhD between clinical features and diagnostic biomarkers, and give guidance about optimal methods John-Paul Taylor, PhD, to establish and interpret these. Substantial new information has been incorporated about pre- MRC Psych viously reported aspects of DLB, with increased diagnostic weighting given to REM sleep Daniel Weintraub, MD behavior disorder and 123iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) myocardial scintigraphy. Dag Aarsland, MD The diagnostic role of other neuroimaging, electrophysiologic, and laboratory investigations James Galvin, MD, MPH is also described. Minor modifications to pathologic methods and criteria are recommended to Johannes Attems, MD take account of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change, to add previously omitted Lewy- Clive G. Ballard, MRC related pathology categories, and to include assessments for substantia nigra neuronal loss. Psych, MD Recommendations about clinical management are largely based upon expert opinion since Ashley Bayston, BA, LLB randomized controlled trials in DLB are few. Substantial progress has been made since the Thomas G. Beach, MD, previous report in the detection and recognition of DLB as a common and important clinical PhD disorder. During that period it has been incorporated into DSM-5, as major neurocognitive Frédéric Blanc, MD, PhD disorder with Lewy bodies. There remains a pressing need to understand the underlying neu- Nicolaas Bohnen, MD, robiology and pathophysiology of DLB, to develop and deliver clinical trials with both symp- PhD tomatic and disease-modifying agents, and to help patients and carers worldwide to inform Laura Bonanni, MD, themselves about the disease, its prognosis, best available treatments, ongoing research, and PhD how to get adequate support. Neurology® 2017;89:1–13 Jose Bras, PhD Patrick Brundin, MD, GLOSSARY PhD AD 5 Alzheimer disease; CHEI 5 cholinesterase inhibitor; DAT 5 dopamine transporter; DLB 5 dementia with Lewy bodies; David Burn, MD, FRCP DSM-5 5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition; LB 5 Lewy body; MCI 5 mild cognitive impairment; MIBG 5 metaiodobenzylguanidine; MMSE 5 Mini-Mental State Examination; MTL 5 medial temporal lobe; Alice Chen-Plotkin, MD PD 5 Parkinson disease; PSG 5 polysomnography; RBD 5 REM sleep behavior disorder. John E. Duda, MD Omar El-Agnaf, PhD The Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) Consortium last reported on diagnosis and manage- Howard Feldman, MD, ment in December 2005, and its recommendations have been widely cited for both clinical FRCP and research use.1,2 Changes made to the diagnostic criteria at that time increased diagnostic Tanis J. Ferman, PhD sensitivity for DLB,e1 but detection rates in clinical practice remain suboptimal,3 with many Dominic ffytche, MD Hiroshige Fujishiro, MD cases missed or misdiagnosed, usually as Alzheimer disease (AD). The revised DLB criteria Douglas Galasko, MD presented here incorporate new developments since then and result from a review process that Jennifer G. Goldman, combined the reports of 4 multidisciplinary, expert working groups with a meeting that MD, MS included patient and care partner participation (appendix e-1 at Neurology.org). The Consor- Stephen N. Gomperts, tium recognizes increasing interest in detecting early-stage disease; prodromal DLB criteria are in MD, PhD development and will be reported separately. Neill R. Graff-Radford, MD SUMMARY OF CHANGES While maintaining their previous structure, the revised DLB clinical diagnostic Lawrence S. Honig, MD, criteria improve on earlier versions1,2 by distinguishing clearly between clinical features and diagnostic PhD Alex Iranzo, MD, PhD Author affiliations are provided at the end of the article. Members of the DLB Consortium are listed at Neurology.org. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article. Author list continued on next page The Article Processing Charge was paid by NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre in Ageing and Long-Term Conditions. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. 1 Kejal Kantarci, MD, MS biomarkers, with guidance about optimal methods to e.g., line orientation, size matching tasks; and percep- Daniel Kaufer, MD establish and interpret these. Clinical signs and symp- tual discrimination, e.g., incomplete figures, incom- Walter Kukull, PhD toms are weighted as core or supportive, and bio- plete letters, pareidolia tasks.10,e4 Virginia M.Y. Lee, PhD markers as indicative or supportive, based upon Memory and object naming tend to be less James B. Leverenz, MD their diagnostic specificity and the volume of good- affected in DLB, and are best evaluated through story Simon Lewis, MBBCh, quality evidence available. Although carrying less recall, verbal list learning, and confrontation naming MD diagnostic weight, supportive items are often valuable tasks, although some patients’ difficulties may be sec- Carol Lippa, MD in clinical decision-making, acting as signposts to or ondary to speed or retrieval task demands. Angela Lunde, MA adding evidence for a DLB diagnosis. The previous No DLB-specific assessment batteries have been Mario Masellis, MD, PhD category of suggestive features is no longer used and developed, although recommendations have been Eliezer Masliah, MD those items, namely REM sleep behavior disorder made about suitable existing instruments11 and a com- Pamela McLean, PhD (RBD), severe neuroleptic sensitivity, and low dopa- posite risk score tool has been published.12 Brit Mollenhauer, MD mine transporter (DAT) imaging, have been reas- Core clinical features. Fluctuation. DLB fluctuations Thomas J. Montine, MD, signed in the new scheme. have been described in detail previously1,2 and are PhD The revised criteria (table 1) generate categories typically delirium-like,e5 occurring as spontaneous al- Emilio Moreno, MD, of probable and possible DLB, corresponding to terations in cognition, attention, and arousal. They PhD terminology previously used, describing the clinical include waxing and waning episodes of behavioral Etsuro Mori, MD, PhD presentations most typical of dementia associated inconsistency, incoherent speech, variable attention, Melissa Murray, PhD with underlying Lewy-related pathology. Because or altered consciousness that involves staring or zon- John T. O’Brien, F Med of considerable pathologic heterogeneity, some ing out. Direct questioning of an informant about Sci, DM dementia presentations associated with Lewy-related fluctuations may not reliably discriminate DLB from Sotoshi Orimo, MD, PhD pathology are atypical, e.g., if abundant neocortical AD, but questions about daytime drowsiness, leth- Ronald B. Postuma, MD, neuritic plaques and tangles are present in addition argy, staring into space, or episodes of disorganized MSc to Lewy bodies (LB), the clinical profile may more speech do. These have been incorporated into scales Shankar Ramaswamy, MD closely resemble AD rather than DLB.4,5 Such mixed that either score the severity and frequency of Owen A. Ross, PhD pathology cases are common, explaining why up to fluctuations derived from a clinical interview or use David P. Salmon, PhD half of carefully research-diagnosed patients with informant reports from semi-structured ques- Andrew Singleton, PhD AD may have unsuspected Lewy-related pathology tionnaires.13–16 Recording variations in attentional Angela Taylor, BM at autopsy.6 Criteria for the detection of such pa- performance using repeated computer-based tests Alan Thomas, PhD tients, previously characterized as the LB variant of offers an independent method.e6 At least one measure Pietro Tiraboschi, MD AD,7 remain to be formulated. of fluctuation should be documented when applying Jon B. Toledo, MD, PhD DLB diagnostic criteria. Fluctuations may also occur John Q. Trojanowski, Clinical features. Dementia, defined as a progressive in advanced stages of other dementias, so they best MD, PhD cognitive decline of sufficient magnitude to interfere predict DLB when they are present early.e7 Debby Tsuang, MD with normal social or occupational functions, or with Visual hallucinations. Recurrent, complex visual hallu- Zuzana Walker, MD, usual daily activities, is an essential requirement for cinations occur in up to 80% of patients with DLB FRC Psych DLB diagnosis. and are a frequent clinical signpost to diagnosis. They Masahito Yamada, MD, Although dementia screens such as the Mini- are typically well-formed, featuring people, children, PhD Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal or animals, sometimes accompanied by related phe- Kenji Kosaka, MD Cognitive Assessment are useful to characterize