The Astronomy Theory, Observations and Methods (ATOM) Journal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1 1/4/18 Dr. Stefi Alison Baum Dean, Faculty of Science Professor, Dept
RESUME – DR. STEFI BAUM, 1/4/18 Dr. Stefi Alison Baum Dean, Faculty of Science Professor, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy University of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB, Canada Email [email protected] cell phone 204-297-0698 EDUCATION B.A. Physics, cum laude June 1980 Harvard University, Cambridge, MA Co-Captain Varsity Women’s Lacrosse and Co-Captain Varsity Women’s Soccer PhD Astronomy Dec 1987 University of Maryland, College Park, MD POST-DEGREE EDUCATION Center for Higher Education Research and Development • The Senior University Administrators Course, Niagara-on-the-Lake, 2015 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Fluno Center, Executive Education, 2013 • Fundraising and Development for Nonprofits Harvard University, Graduate School of Education, 2012 • Performance Assessment in Higher Education Peabody Fellow, Vanderbilt Peabody Professional Institute, 2011 • Higher Education Management Pardee RAND Graduate School, 2009, New Security Challenges Harvard-MIT-Tufts Program on Negotiation, Executive Ed Series, 2007 • Program on Negotiation for Senior Executives • Dealing with Difficult People and Difficult Situations American Council on Education, 2005, Chairing the Academic Department MIT-Sloan Executive Series, 2002, 2003, 2005: • System Dynamics for Senior Managers • Managing Technical Professionals and Organizations • The Innovative Organization United States Foreign Service Institute, 2004, Global Issues Coursera Courses Completed - 2013 • Leading Innovative Change in Organizations, Vanderbilt University • Synapses, Neurons and Brains, Hebrew University of Jerusalem • What a Plant Knows, Tel Aviv University, (audit) • Epigenetic Control of Gene Expression, University of Melborne, (audit) • A Brief History of Humankind, Hebrew University (audit) • Surviving Disruptive Technologies, University of Maryland, (audit) 1 EXPERTISE Over 25 years of leadership in highly interdisciplinary research and educational environments, including higher education, not for profits, and government agencies. -
Introductory Guide for Authors This Guide Is for Early-Career Researchers Who Are Beginning to Write Papers for Publication
Introductory guide for authors This guide is for early-career researchers who are beginning to write papers for publication. publishingsupport.iopscience.org publishingsupport.iopscience.org This guide is for early-career researchers who are beginning to write papers for publication. Academic publishing is rapidly changing, with new technologies and publication models giving authors much more choice over where and how to publish their work. Whether you are writing up the results of a PhD chapter or submitting your first paper, knowing how to prepare your work for publication is essential. This guide will provide an overview of academic publishing and advice on how to make the most of the process for sharing your research. For more information and to download a digital version of this guide go to publishingsupport.iopscience.org. c o n t e n t s Page Choosing where to submit your paper 4 Writing and formatting 6 Peer-review process 8 Revising and responding to referee reports 10 Acceptance and publication 12 Promoting your published work 13 Copyright and ethical integrity 14 Frequently asked questions 15 Publishing glossary 16 IOP publications 18 Introductory guide for authors 3 publishingsupport.iopscience.org Choosing where to submit your paper It can be tempting to begin writing a paper before giving much thought to where it might be published. However, choosing a journal to target before you begin to prepare your paper will enable you to tailor your writing to the journal’s audience and format your paper according to its specific guidelines, which you may find on the journal’s website. -
Downloaded Manually1
The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a Comparative Analysis Philippe Mongeon and Adèle Paul-Hus [email protected]; [email protected] Université de Montréal, École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, H3C 3J7 Montréal, Qc, Canada Abstract Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research evaluation. Most bibliometric analyses have in common their data sources: Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science (WoS) and Elsevier’s Scopus. This research compares the journal coverage of both databases in terms of fields, countries and languages, using Ulrich’s extensive periodical directory as a base for comparison. Results indicate that the use of either WoS or Scopus for research evaluation may introduce biases that favor Natural Sciences and Engineering as well as Biomedical Research to the detriment of Social Sciences and Arts and Humanities. Similarly, English-language journals are overrepresented to the detriment of other languages. While both databases share these biases, their coverage differs substantially. As a consequence, the results of bibliometric analyses may vary depending on the database used. Keywords Bibliometrics, citations indexes, Scopus, Web of Science, research evaluation Introduction Bibliometric and scientometric methods have multiple and varied application realms, that goes from information science, sociology and history of science to research evaluation and scientific policy (Gingras, 2014). Large scale bibliometric research was made possible by the creation and development of the Science Citation Index (SCI) in 1963, which is now part of Web of Science (WoS) alongside two other indexes: the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) (Wouters, 2006). -
Open Infrastructure and Community: the Case of Astronomy
SPECIALISED PORTALS, ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES, SCHOLARLY ONLINE NETWORKS: THE IMPACT OF E-INFRASTRUCTURES ON SCIENCE COMMUNICATION AND SCHOLARLY COMMUNITY BUILDING Open infrastructure and community: the case of astronomy Niels Taubert Abstract This comment focuses on an early case of an open infrastructure that emerged in the 1990s in international astronomy. It targets the reasons for this infrastructure’s tremendous success and starts with a few comments on the term ‘digital infrastructure’. Subsequently, it provides a brief description of the most important components of the infrastructure in astronomy. In a third step, the use of one component — the arXiv, an open access repository for manuscripts — is analyzed. It concludes with some considerations about the success and acceptance of this infrastructure in astronomy. Keywords Scholarly communication; Science communication: theory and models DOI https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17020302 Introduction The creation and establishment of a discipline-specific digital infrastructure is challenging. In many cases it is highly questionable before or during its development whether the requirements of the targeted user group [Van Zundert, 2012] will be met, and when completed whether the extent of its utilization may stay behind the initial expectations [Kaltenbrunner, 2017, p. 303] often due to nebulous reasons. The aim of this comment is to approach at least some of the difficulties of the development of a digital infrastructure in science by drawing on a successful case: the digital infrastructure in international astronomy. In a first step, a heuristic model is given. It illustrates that the development of an infrastructure is not merely a technical task, but a creation of a complex arrangement that includes a two-sided social embedding of the technology. -
Vitae-Balonek-Full-2019 May 13
Thomas J. Balonek Professor of Physics and Astronomy Department of Physics and Astronomy Colgate University 13 Oak Drive, Hamilton, NY 13346 (315) 228-7767 [email protected] EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND Ph.D. (Astronomy) University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 1982 M.S. (Astronomy) University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 1977 B.A. (Physics) Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1974 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND Professor of Physics and Astronomy, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY (2002-present) Chair, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY (2008-2011) Visiting Research Scientist, National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (2006-2007) Associate Professor of Physics and Astronomy, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY (1991-2002) Chair, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY (1995-1998) Chair, New York Astronomical Corporation (1995-1998) Visiting Research Scientist, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Tucson, AZ (1992-1993) Assistant Professor of Physics and Astronomy, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY (1985-1991) Visiting Assistant Professor of Astronomy, Williams College, Williamstown, MA (1983-1985) NASA-ASEE (National Aeronautics and Space Administration and American Society for Engineering Education) Summer Faculty Fellow, NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA (1983, 1984) Post-Doctoral Research Associate and Lecturer I, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (1982-1983) Planetarium Lecturer, Basset Planetarium, Amherst College, Amherst, MA (1979-1981) -
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Audience p.1 • Impact Factor p.1 • Abstracting and Indexing p.1 • Editorial Board p.2 • Guide for Authors p.4 ISSN: 0165-0270 DESCRIPTION . The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal's Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations. The Journal no longer publishes papers that exclusively deal with research on skin, muscle (and muscle function, evoked muscle activity, EMG, motor evoked potentials, kinematics, motor learning, rehabilitation) and eye (retina, EOG, hand-eye co-ordination). Analytical and binding methods for neuroactive drugs/neurotransmitters/other endogenous nervous system substances, as well as manuscripts that deal with language, toxicology, clinical trials and case reports are also not considered for publication. Finally, manuscripts dealing exclusively with new algorithms/softwares are not considered for publication in this Journal. Finally, manuscripts dealing exclusively with new tools/ software with no scientific/research component are not considered for -
1667 K Street NW, Suite 800 • Washington, DC 20006 • Aas.Org 6
6 May 2020 Dr. Lisa Nichols Office of Science and Technology Policy 1650 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20504 [email protected] Re: AAS Response to OSTP Request for Information: Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications, Data and Code Resulting from Federally Funded Research, FR Doc. 2020–03189, 12 February 2020 Dear Dr. Nichols: We appreciate the opportunity to have met with you on 28 February and to learn of the OSTP’s recognition of the critical role of nonprofit society publishers in advancing open access to federally funded research. We look forward to continued dialogue and engagement in this area. The American Astronomical Society (AAS), established in 1899 and based in Washington, DC, is the major organization of professional astronomers in North America. Its membership of over 8,000 individuals also includes physicists, mathematicians, geologists, engineers, and others whose research and educational interests lie within the broad spectrum of subjects comprising contemporary astronomy, planetary science, and heliophysics. The mission of the AAS is to enhance and share humanity’s scientific understanding of the universe. As a 501(c)(3) the AAS owns, operates, and publishes the most widely read and cited journals in the field: The Astronomical Journal (AJ), The Astrophysical Journal (ApJ), The Astrophysical Journal Letters, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, and The Planetary Science Journal. The AJ was established in 1849 and came into AAS ownership 100 years later; the ApJ was established in 1895, 100 years before becoming one of the very first scholarly journals online. One of the conditions for taking ownership of the ApJ from the University of Chicago in the 1970s included a provision whereby journal proceeds were not to be used to directly fund the ongoing operations of the society. -
Web of Science (Wos) and Scopus: the Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today's Academic World
publications Review Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World Raminta Pranckute˙ Scientific Information Department, Library, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio˙ Ave. 14, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] Abstract: Nowadays, the importance of bibliographic databases (DBs) has increased enormously, as they are the main providers of publication metadata and bibliometric indicators universally used both for research assessment practices and for performing daily tasks. Because the reliability of these tasks firstly depends on the data source, all users of the DBs should be able to choose the most suitable one. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus are the two main bibliographic DBs. The comprehensive evaluation of the DBs’ coverage is practically impossible without extensive bibliometric analyses or literature reviews, but most DBs users do not have bibliometric competence and/or are not willing to invest additional time for such evaluations. Apart from that, the convenience of the DB’s interface, performance, provided impact indicators and additional tools may also influence the users’ choice. The main goal of this work is to provide all of the potential users with an all-inclusive description of the two main bibliographic DBs by gathering the findings that are presented in the most recent literature and information provided by the owners of the DBs at one place. This overview should aid all stakeholders employing publication and citation data in selecting the most suitable DB. Keywords: WoS; Scopus; bibliographic databases; comparison; content coverage; evaluation; citation impact indicators Citation: Pranckute,˙ R. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans 1. -
Where to Publish?
Where to publish? A Handbook of Scientific Journals for Contributors to Marine Conservation Joshua Cinner and Anya Jaeckli ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, AUSTRALIA. Email: [email protected] Version: September 2018 1 Foreword Deciding where to publish can be important- even career changing. A paper in the right journal can make a career, sometimes even define a field, while the same type of research may fade to oblivion in the wrong venue. Knowing which journals are well suited to your research is an important part of being a scientist. For many scientists, there is a wide range of potential venues. So many, in fact, that many of us often forget what the available options are. Here, we compiled a guide of what we consider key journals in interdisciplinary field of marine resource management. We excluded journals that had a focus on pure, rather than applied ecology, geomorphology, or social science. A lot goes into deciding where to publish- popular metrics such as the impact factor are often used, but it is our feeling that this should be done with great caution. For example, just because a journal has a low impact factor does not mean it is not incredibly influential. Here, we present a number of journal metrics, including impact factor, Scimago Journal Rank (SJR), H-index, and others (which we describe in detail below) for 63 journals that publish interdisciplinary papers on marine resource management. We also provide a description of the aims and scope of the journal (from the journal’s website), and in a few cases, we provide some personal notes about the journal. -
Annualreport
2 17 ANNUALREPORT 17 20 TABLEOFCONTENTS 1 Trustee’s Update 2 Director’s Update 3 Science Highlights 30 Technical Support Highlights 34 Development Highlights 37 Public Program Highlights 40 Putnam Collection Center Highlights 41 Communication Highlights 43 Peer-Reviewed Publications 49 Conference Proceedings & Abstracts 59 Statement of Financial Position TRUSTEE’SUPDATE By W. Lowell Putnam About a decade ago the phrase, unique, enriching and transformative “The transformational effect of the as well. We are committed to building DCT”, started being used around the on that in all that we are doing going Observatory. We were just beginning forward. to understand that a 4 meter class We are not the only growing entity telescope was going to be more in the Flagstaff area. There has seen impactful than our original, and naïve, substantial growth at NAU, at our other concept of “2x the Perkins”. Little did we partner institutions and in the number know then, and we are still learning just of high technology, for-profit business in how transforming the DCT has been. the region. This collective growth is now As you read Jeff’s report and look creating opportunities for collaboration through the rest of this report you can and partnerships that did not exist a begin to see the results in terms of decade ago. We have the potential scientific capability and productivity. to do things that we would not have The greater awareness of Lowell on considered even a few years ago. The the regional and national level has challenge will be doing them in ways also lead to the increases in the public that keep the Observatory the collegial program, and the natural progression and collaborative haven that it has to building a better visitor program and always been. -
Lowell Observatory Publications 2013 Armstrong, J. T. ; Hutter, D. J. ; Baines, E. K. ; Benson, J. A. ; Bevilacqua, R. M. ; Busc
Lowell Observatory Publications 2013 Armstrong, J. T. ; Hutter, D. J. ; Baines, E. K. ; Benson, J. A. ; Bevilacqua, R. M. ; Buschmann, T. ; Clark, J. H. ; Ghasempour, A. ; Hall, J. C. ; Hindsley, R. B. ; Johnston, K. J. ; Jorgensen, A. M. ; Mozurkewich, D. ; Muterspaugh, M. W. ; Restaino, S. R. ; Shankland, P. D. ; Schmitt, H. R. ; Tycner, C. ; van Belle, G. T. ; Zavala, R. T. (2013). The Navy Precision Optical Interferometer (NPOI): An Update. Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, Volume 2, Issue 2, id. 1340002 Baines, Ellyn K. ; Armstrong, J. Thomas ; van Belle, Gerard T. (2013). Navy Precision Optical Interferometer Observations of the Exoplanet Host κ Coronae Borealis and Their Implications for the Star's and Planet's Masses and Ages. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Volume 771, Issue 1, article id. L17 Baines, Ellyn K. ; McAlister, Harold A. ; ten Brummelaar, Theo A. ; Turner, Nils H. ; Sturmann, Judit ; Sturmann, Laszlo ; Farrington, Christopher D. ; Vargas, Norm ; van Belle, Gerard T. ; Ridgway, Stephen T. (2013). Characterization of the Red Giant HR 2582 Using the CHARA Array. The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 772, Issue 1, article id. 16 Baumeister, H. ; Chazelas, B. ; Delplancke, F. ; Dérie, F. ; Di Lieto, N. ; Duc, T. P. ; Fleury, M. ; Graser, U. ; Kaminski, A. ; Köhler, R. ; Lévêque, S. ; Maire, C. ; Mégevand, D. ; Mérand, A. ; Michellod, Y. ; Moresmau, J. -M. ; Mohler, M. ; Müller, A. ; Müllhaupt, P. ; Naranjo, V. ; Sache, L. ; Salvade, Y. ; Schmid, C. ; Schuhler, N. ; Schulze-Hartung, T. ; Sosnowska, D. ; Tubbs, B. ; van Belle, G. T. ; Wagner, K. ; Weber, L. ; Zago, L. ; Zimmerman, N. (2013). The ESPRI project: astrometric exoplanet search with PRIMA. I. Instrument description and performance of first light observations. -
Academic Publishing: Writing, Submission, and Successful Publication
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING: WRITING, SUBMISSION, AND SUCCESSFUL PUBLICATION 1. WHY PUBLISH IN ENGLISH? Reach a global audience, achieve high impact, contribute to international discourse, increase your likelihood of being quoted, and develop your work to the highest possible standard. 2. IMPORTANCE OF LANGUAGE IN ACADEMIC PUBLISHING The advancement of science rests on the publication of new discoveries in scientific journals. Academic publishing produces over 1.5 million scholarly manuscripts every year via peer review. Despite this elevated publication number, rejection rates because of language issues approximate 21% after preliminary editorial screening and 60% overall. These rates can reach 95% in high impact factor journals such as Nature, Cell, and The Lancet. 3. WHAT ARE THE VARIOUS PUBLISHING OPTIONS IN ENGLISH? Subscribe to Enago Academy’s newsletter to get the latest updates in the world of academic publishing. Subscribe Now TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS . Scholarly Journals . Book (contributing writer) – Open access journals . Conference paper/presentation – Subscription-based journals . Poster session at academic conference . Book Review . Case study . Book Chapter . Hybrid journals . Book (single author) 4. OVERVIEW OF THE SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING PROCESS Subscribe to Enago Academy’s newsletter to get the latest updates in the world of academic publishing. Subscribe Now 5. WHY PUBLISH IN ENGLISH? ENGLISH IS THE PREDOMINANT LANGUAGE OF SCIENCE . In 1980, about 85% of the documents covered by Journal Citation Reports were in English; however, by 2000, the proportion increased to 96%. The proportion of documents in German declined from 5% to 2.5% to just 1%. Impact factor increased for English language journals compared to non-English journals. 6.