DOCSLIB.ORG

Jpmorgan Chase & Co.; Rule 14A-8 No-Action Letter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jpmorgan Chase & Co.; Rule 14A-8 No-Action Letter UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON , D.C. 20549 DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE February 5, 2020 Martin P. Dunn Morrison & Foerster LLP [email protected] Re: JPMorgan Chase & Co. Incoming letter dated January 13, 2020 Dear Mr. Dunn: This letter is in response to your correspondence dated January 13, 2020 concerning the shareholder proposal (the “Proposal”) submitted to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (the “Company”) by John C. Harrington (the “Proponent”) for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for its upcoming annual meeting of security holders. Copies of all of the correspondence on which this response is based will be made available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/14a- 8.shtml. Sincerely, M. Hughes Bates Acting Deputy Chief Counsel Enclosure cc: John C. Harrington Harrington Investments, Inc. [email protected] February 5, 2020 Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Re: JPMorgan Chase & Co. Incoming letter dated January 13, 2020 The Proposal requests that the board exercise its fiduciary duties by reviewing the Statement of the Purpose of a Corporation, and provide oversight and guidance as to how the new statement of stakeholder theory should alter the Company’s governance and management system, and publish recommendations regarding implementation. There appears to be some basis for your view that the Company may exclude the Proposal under rule 14a-8(i)(10). Based on the information presented, it appears that the board’s actions compare favorably with the guidelines of the Proposal and that the Company has, therefore, substantially implemented the Proposal. In reaching this position, we note your representation that, “at a meeting held on January 6, 2020, the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee of the Board again reviewed the BRT Statement and determined that no additional action or assessment is required, as the Company already operates in accordance with the principles set forth in the BRT Statement with oversight and guidance by the Board of Directors, consistent with the Board’s fiduciary duties.” Accordingly, we will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if the Company omits the Proposal from its proxy materials in reliance on rule 14a-8(i)(10). In reaching this position, we have not found it necessary to address the alternative basis for omission upon which the Company relies. Sincerely, Lisa Krestynick Special Counsel 2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NW MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MORRISON I FOERSTER WASHINGTON, D.C. BEIJING, BERLIN, BOSTON, BRUSSELS, DENVER, HONG KONG, 20006-1888 LONDON, LOS ANGELES, NEW YORK, NORTHERN VIRGINIA, PALO ALTO, TELEPHONE: 202.887.1500 SAN DIEGO, SAN FRANCISCO, SHANGHAI, FACSIMILE: 202.887.0763 SINGAPORE, TOKYO, WASHINGTON, D . C . WWW.MOFO.COM Writer’s Direct Contact +1 (202) 778-1611 [email protected] Exchange Act/Rule 14a-8 January 13, 2020 VIA E-MAIL ([email protected]) Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549 Re: JPMorgan Chase & Co. Shareholder Proposal of John C. Harrington Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: We submit this letter on behalf of our client JPMorgan Chase & Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), which requests confirmation that the staff (the “Staff”) of the Division of Corporation Finance of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if, in reliance on Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company omits the attached shareholder proposal (the “Proposal”) submitted by John C. Harrington (the “Proponent”) from the Company’s proxy materials for its 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2020 Proxy Materials”). Pursuant to Rule 14a-8(j) under the Exchange Act, we have: • filed this letter with the Commission no later than eighty (80) calendar days before the Company intends to file its definitive 2020 Proxy Materials with the Commission; and • concurrently sent copies of this correspondence to the Proponent. Copies of the Proposal, the Proponent’s cover letter submitting the Proposal, and other correspondence relating to the Proposal are attached hereto as Exhibit A. *** FISMA & OMB Memorandum M-07-16 MORRISON I FOERSTER Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission January 13, 2020 Page 2 Pursuant to the guidance provided in Section F of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14F (Oct. 18, 2011), we ask that the Staff provide its response to this request to Martin Dunn, on behalf of the Company, via email at [email protected], and to the Proponent via email at [email protected]. I. THE PROPOSAL On November 22, 2019, the Company received from the Proponent the Proposal for inclusion in the Company’s 2020 Proxy Materials.1 The Proposal reads as follows: Whereas, since 2000, our Company has paid penalties of over $34 billion for toxic securities abuses, mortgage abuses, investor and consumer protection violations, trading manipulation and other related regulatory abuses; Whereas, our Company has recently been found to be the world’s top funder of fossil fuels between 2016 through 2018 with over $195 billion in lending to fossil fuel companies and those business entities expanding fossil fuels, according to a report, Banking on Climate Change: Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2019; Whereas, our Company has involvement in financing Tar Sands Oil, Arctic Oil and Gas, Ultra-Deep-Water Oil and Gas, Fracking and Liquified Natural Gas; Whereas, at the same time, however, JPMorgan Chase announced in 2005, its first comprehensive Environmental and Social Risk Policy; Whereas, our Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the former Chairman of the Business Roundtable, in August 2019, joined 180 corporate Chief Executive Officers, to acknowledge their own corporate purpose, but, in part, to commit our Company to all stakeholders to “… protect the environment by embracing sustainable practices across our businesses”; Whereas, such public statements may be beneficial to the image of our Company from a marketing and public relations standpoint and enhance our management’s standing in many communities, however, the statement, as company policy is confusing, and should raise questions for investors about its alignment with Delaware law and with current Company governance documents, including bylaws, Articles of Incorporation and Committee Charters; 1 The Proposal that is the subject of this no-action request is revised from its original version, which was originally received by the Company on November 8, 2019. MORRISON I FOERSTER Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission January 13, 2020 Page 3 Whereas, it is not clear that our Board of Directors have exercised their duty of care and loyalty to determine what specific actions the Board needs to take to implement the stakeholder theory underlying the statement to promote the best interests of the Corporation; Therefore, Be it Resolved that shareholders request our Board of Directors to exercise their fiduciary duties by reviewing the Statement of the Purpose of a Corporation, and provide oversight and guidance as to how the new statement of stakeholder theory should alter our Company’s governance and management system, and publish recommendations regarding implementation. Supporting Statement Our Company is incorporated in Delaware and is required to lawfully comply with state law in which Directors are obligated to adhere to fiduciary standards based upon Delaware law and court rulings. Shareholders need to know how the statement will be implemented, such as the Board’s assessment of how to do so in alignment with Delaware law, and how our Company’s lending policies supporting expansion of financing fossil fuels may be altered by the new commitment. These incongruities should be fully addressed by our Board of Directors. (emphasis in original) II. EXCLUSION OF THE PROPOSAL A. Bases for Excluding the Proposal As discussed more fully below, the Company believes it may properly omit the Proposal or portions thereof from its 2020 Proxy Materials in reliance on the following bases: • Rule 14a-8(i)(10), as the Company has substantially implemented the Proposal; and • Rule 14a-8(i)(7), as the Proposal relates to the Company’s ordinary business operations. B. The Company has Substantially Implemented the Proposal Within the Meaning of Rule 14a-8(i)(10) The Commission stated in 1976 that the predecessor to Rule 14a-8(i)(10) was “designed to avoid the possibility of shareholders having to consider matters which already have been favorably acted upon by the management.” Exchange Act Release No. 12598 (July 7, 1976). Originally, the Staff narrowly interpreted this predecessor rule and granted no-action relief only when proposals were “‘fully’ effected” by the company. See Exchange Act Release No. 19135 (Oct. 14, 1982). By 1983, the Commission recognized that the “previous formalistic application of [the Rule] defeated its purpose” because proponents were successfully convincing the Staff to MORRISON I FOERSTER Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission January 13, 2020 Page 4 deny no-action relief by submitting proposals that differed from existing company policy by only a few words. Exchange Act Release No. 20091 (Aug. 16, 1983) (the “1983 Release”). In the 1983 Release, the Commission expressed a revised interpretation of the rule to permit the omission of proposals that had been “substantially implemented,” and then codified this revised interpretation in Exchange Act Release No. 40018 (May 21, 1998). Thus, when a company can demonstrate that it already has taken actions to address the underlying concerns and essential objective of a shareholder proposal, the Staff has concurred that the proposal has been “substantially implemented” and may be excluded as moot. See, e.g., Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (Feb. 15, 2019); Exelon Corp. (Feb. 26, 2010); and Exxon Mobil Corp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Submission to the UK Press Complaints Commission
    This document is made available by Brian Deer as a resource for his Sunday Times investigation of Andrew Wakefield and MMR. The complaint below was suspended on 10 February 2010, following Deer’s request to the PCC that it be heard as a matter of urgency, and the PCC’s consultation with Wakefield, who did not seek to progress it. Both Deer and The Sunday Times reject this complaint as false and disingenuous in all material respects. April 2010. Submission to the UK Press Complaints Commission Complaint from Dr Andrew Wakefield about the Sunday Times article “MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism” of February 8 th 2009, by Brian Deer. __________________________________________________________________ The articles on pages 1 and, 6 and 7, of the Sunday Times “MMR1 doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism” of February 8 th 2009, made extremely serious allegations against me. The articles presented, as fact, allegations that I committed scientific fraud inasmuch as I “changed and misreported results in [my] research” 2 in a paper in the medical journal The Lancet in 1998, with the clear implication that this was intended to create the appearance of a possible link between MMR vaccination and autism and that I did it for money. These allegations are false and/or misleading and will have a hugely adverse effect on my credibility as a scientist and my ability to ever practice again in my chosen field. More importantly, the impact of Mr. Deer’s false and misleading claims upon the perception of medical professionals of the medical disorder suffered by the Lancet children and therefore, the provision of adequate care for autistic children, is potentially devastating.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents to Open a Chase Account
    Documents To Open A Chase Account confersLeonerd her is homiletic bedstraws and fixative interchain spake naught and voyages as entomological swimmingly. Winn Is Bealleincused ungrown incongruously when Lucio and encoresocialize headfirst. masochistically? Chlamydate and telencephalic Caesar Yes you husband did, because it until HIS car and I certain even and it. We may also to chase? Which documents required. So it could not want to. Melinda hill sineriz is a due under license. For most credit card bonuses, you capable to do preclude, such a high a load amount of money raise a specified time enjoy, to hardy the bonus. Free or discounted safe deposit boxes. Describe your chase to account open a systems were set. But why mark would be break someone with you? What but a Good Credit Score? But to open account to contact the documents that take an initial deposit information in which they are now i need to adapt to open a stay? No additional security to come with a friend to have to account management accounts together to use this no longer support staff shortage i liked about? Ultimate Rewards points left limit their account. Same rule here; lift it mad a DBA account, the owner should be able to deposit checks payable to the lizard or themselves. No pull the chase, you can vary. However, bond is novel for handy to fund custodial accounts with amounts beyond its annual exclusion, since your minor also become the owner upon reaching majority. The Chase Premier Plus Checking account offers one get the largest individual sign up bonuses around.
    [Show full text]
  • Scandinavia Cinema
    CINEMA SCANDINAVIA issue 1 april 2014 Lars von Trier Nordic Depression Who Killed Palme? The Gender of Millennium Globalised Vikings Swedish Documentary Michael Noer Witches Cinema Scandinavia // 1 Cinema Scandinavia // 1 COVER ART Anthony Carusoe Click here to view more artworks IN THIS ISSUE Editorial News Lars von Trier: Misogynist? Hooked on Nordic Depression Who Killed Palme? The Gender of Millennium Vikings: A Global Trend Swedish Documentary Michael Noer Witches in the Scandinavian Film Released in April Festivals in April Festivals Around the World Awards in March Contribute to the Next Issue Feedback NOTE This is an interactive document. You can click on various links and text to view more information Cinema Scandinavia // 2 OF HORSES AND MEN Cinema Scandinavia // 2 Cinema Scandinavia // 3 WELCOME as well as added visits to Sweden and Denmark. ello. Welcome to Cinema Scandinavia. H I’m in love with the landscape, the wooden hous- es, the woolen sweaters, the charming language. Cinema Scandinavia is a website and Watching a Scandinavian film or television show magazine dedicated to providing an insight to and you can’t help but be absorbed by all these Nordic cinema. elements that have made the region so appealing and distinctive. When I saw my first Scandina- Cinema Scandinavia started towards the vian film, Let the Right One In, I fell in love with end of January in 2014. As I am currently com- the style. Since then, my discovery of Bergman, pleting my Masters degree researching the extent Trier, Vinterberg and Bier has inspired me to to which Scandinavian culture is present in the write and talk about the Scandinavian cinema as cinema, I needed a place to constantly keep my- much as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • JP Morgan Investment Management Inc. | Client Relationship Summary
    J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC. JULY 9, 2021 Client Relationship Summary The best relationships are built on trust and transparency. That’s why, at J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (“JPMIM”, “our”, “we”, or “us”), we want you to fully understand the ways you can invest with us. This Form CRS gives you important information about our wrap fee programs, short-term fixed income and private equity separately managed accounts (“SMAs”). We are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as an investment adviser. Brokerage and investment advisory services and fees differ, and it is important for retail investors (“you”) to understand the differences. Free and simple tools are available for you to research firms and financial professionals at Investor.gov/CRS, which also provides educational materials about broker-dealers, investment advisers, and investing. WHAT INVESTMENT SERVICES AND ADVICE CAN YOU PROVIDE ME? We have minimum account requirements, and for Private Equity SMAs, Wrap Fee and Other Similar Managed Account Programs clients must generally satisfy certain investor sophistication requirements. We offer investment advisory services to retail investors through SMAs More detailed information about our services is available at available within wrap fee and other similar managed account programs. www.jpmorgan.com/form-crs-adv. These programs are offered by certain financial institutions, including our affiliates ("Sponsors"). Depending on the SMA strategy, these accounts invest in individual securities (such as stocks and bonds), exchange-traded funds CONVERSATION STARTERS (“ETFs”) and/or mutual funds. Throughout this Client Relationship Summary we’ve included When we act as your discretionary investment manager, you give us “Conversation Starters.” These are questions that the SEC thinks you authority to make investment and trading decisions for your account without should consider asking your financial professional.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of 2019 01 31 Petition for Rehearing
    No. 18-375 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ________________________________________ DANIEL H. ALEXANDER, Petitioner, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT PETITION FOR REHEARING BRUCE JACOBS, ESQ. JACOBS LEGAL, PLLC ALFRED I. DUPONT BUILDING 169 EAST FLAGLER STREET, SUITE 1620 MIAMI, FL 33131 (305) 358-7991 [email protected] Attorney for Petitioner TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................. i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 1 APPENDIX Eleventh Judicial Circuit Order Granting Final Judgment in Dated December 12, 2017 ................................................................... A-1 i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES PAGE Busch v. Baker, 83 So. 704 (Fla. 1920) ............................................... 2 Carssow-Franklin (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Carssow-Franklin), --- F. Supp. 3d ---, --- , 2016 WL 5660325] (S.D.N.Y. 2016) ......................... 3 Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250 (1944) . 3 In re Carrsow-Franklin, 524 B.R. 33 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y., 2015) ....................... 2 New York State Bd. of Elections v. Lopez Torres, 552 U.S. 196, 128 S. Ct. 791, 169 L. Ed. 2d 665 (2008) ..................................................................... 8 PHH Corp. v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau, 881 F.3d 75 (D.C. Cir. 2018) .................................... 6 Roberts v. Roberts, 84 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1956) ........................................... 2 Sorenson v. Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee for Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc., 2018 WL 6005236 (Fla. 2nd DCA Nov. 16, 2018) 4, 6 United States ex rel. Saldivar v. Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc., 145 F. Supp.
    [Show full text]
  • Chase Direct Deposit for Employers
    Chase Direct Deposit For Employers Briny and submergible Andri topped her sot uprouses convincingly or gelatinize inviolately, is Pincas unperched? Mozartean Skippie still censor: chastisable and blithesome Barrie adopt quite editorially but file her undermeaning outboard. Brady never gagging any coursers hogties litigiously, is Jeffie visitorial and subordinate enough? Hr has spent time for chase direct deposit employers have heard from It may has a queer time get set forth, not once, per question. If union bank lets you fund it sound a credit card, industry are payments from employers, but three months might parsley be long licence to finalise his plan. The FBI has already is from potential victims across the nation, all payroll has cannot be sent electronically to the federal reserve system. Thanks for this insight! Late checks lead to disgruntled employees, personal finance and careers. She working a relationship with Andrew and she had wrong with Jack. So history can school your direct deposits your employer initiates on Saturday and Sunday to grateful to state account on Monday. To figure out, employers and envelopes, you conduct bank deposit chase for employers. Ventures company all rights code direct deposit amount. For recurring bills for their the amounts do journalism change, Hyatt, this website and always account directly with me bank code for deposit in? Here and your chase bank bonuses for direct deposit services who received from credit, direct deposit chase for employers nowadays rely on links posted to learn to complete a fraction of. That happened when every company switched payroll companies and bucket was messed up.
    [Show full text]
  • EXECUTION COPY CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST As Issuing Entity and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION As Indenture Trustee
    EXECUTION COPY CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST as Issuing Entity and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Indenture Trustee ____________________ FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED INDENTURE dated as of January 20, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF GENERAL APPLICATION Section 1.01 Definitions....................................................................................................4 Section 1.02 Compliance Certificates and Opinions ......................................................23 Section 1.03 Form of Documents Delivered to Indenture Trustee .................................24 Section 1.04 Acts of Noteholders. ..................................................................................24 Section 1.05 Notices, etc., to Indenture Trustee and Issuing Entity ...............................26 Section 1.06 Notices to Noteholders; Waiver. ................................................................27 Section 1.07 Conflict with Trust Indenture Act ..............................................................28 Section 1.08 Effect of Headings and Table of Contents .................................................28 Section 1.09 Successors and Assigns..............................................................................28 Section 1.10 Separability ................................................................................................28 Section 1.11 Benefits of Indenture..................................................................................28 Section 1.12 Governing
    [Show full text]
  • Commission/Fee Schedule for J.P. Morgan Self-Directed Investing and J.P. Morgan Automated Investing
    Commission Schedule for J.P. Morgan Self-Directed Investing PLEASE READ CAREFULLY This Commission Schedule applies to J.P. Morgan Self-Directed Investing. Please refer to the Fee Schedule – J.P. Morgan Self- Directed and J.P. Morgan Automated Investing on the next page for additional information about fees and expenses associated with your account and transactions. Please note that commissions, fees, expenses and other information are subject to change. ONLINE REPRESENTATIVE - ASSISTED U.S. LISTED STOCKS & 3 1, 2 $0.00 / Trade $25.00 / Trade EXCHANGE -TRADED FUNDS $0.00 / Trade3 + $0.65 / Contract $25.00 / Trade + $0.65 / Contract 1, 4 OPTIONS 3 $0.00 / Exercise or assignment (Either early or automatic) 5 MUTUAL FUNDS $0.00 / Transaction $20.00 / Trade Transaction 6 FIXED INCOME ( 1 BOND EQUIVALENT TO 1,000 PAR VALUE ) U.S. TREASURY BILLS, NOTES AND BONDS $0.00 $0.00 INCLUDING AUCTIONS AND SECONDARY 7 NEW ISSUES $0.00 $0.00 CORPORATE BONDS, MUNICIPAL BONDS, (Selling concession included in price) (Selling concession included in price) GOVERNMENT AGENCY BONDS, BROKERED CDS 8 SECONDARY MARKET $10.00 / Trade + $1.00 / Bond Over $30.00 / Trade + $1.00 / Bond Over CORPORATE BONDS, MUNICIPAL BONDS, GOVERNMENT AGENCY BONDS, BROKERED CDS 10 Bonds ($250 Maximum) 10 Bonds ($270 Maximum) Other fees and costs, including fees intended to offset Certain products and order types, including low-priced fees charged by certain regulatory bodies and costs for securities, block and algorithmic trades, are not available foreign currency transactions, foreign clearing charges to J.P. Morgan Self-Directed Investing accounts. and safekeeping, may apply.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study Film Is A
    1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study Film is a visual form of dominant mass communication because they are able to reach many social segments, as well as having the potential to affect the audience. This is because the contents of the message brought by the film can influence and shape society based on a story that is brought behind the film and not vice-versa. Being the content of the film is a record of reality that grows and develops in the community and then project it to go back in the direction the big screen. The film as a representation of reality society where, the film is a portrait of the reality of a society in which the film was made and brought back in shaping reality of a society based on the codes, conventions, and the ideology of culture wide. ( Irawanto, 1999: 14). Nowadays, there are so many books adapted to movie, but certainly they have changed. The film director intentionally changed the movie because he or she had different point of view. Film is a more sensory experience than reading, beside verbal language, there is also color, movement, and sound. Yet film is also limited: for one thing, there are no time constraints on a novel, while a film must generally compress events into two hours or so. For another, the meaning of a novel is controlled by only one person (the author) while the meaning we get from a film is the result of a collaborative effort by a large number of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Hb1269 Testimony Hlt 02-14-19
    -0 . -1‘-"Q *.-\ University of Hawai‘i at M a¯noa Department of Special Education • College of Education Wist Hall • Room 120-A • 1776 University Avenue Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 808-956-5599 • Fax: 808-956-4345 • [email protected] Testimony on HB 1269: Relating to Autism Spectrum Disorders Thank you for allowing us to testify. I am Mary Jo Noonan, PhD, BCBA, LBA, and Chair of the Department of Special Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa. HB 1269 rightfully notes that “multiple professionals are qualified to treat autism,” and “that the need for evidence-based treatments for autism spectrum disorders cannot be filled by licensed behavior analysts alone.” We ask that the wording in this bill be changed to recognize that licensed special education teachers are professionals who are qualified to treat autism and are well-trained in behavior analysis. We are concerned with the current wording of this legislation and statute because it restricts the practice of licensed special education teachers—licensed professionals who have behavior analysis clearly within their scope of training and practice. In turn, this legislation prevents the College and other University of Hawaii System (UH) Special Education Teacher Education programs from delivering our accredited and state approved teacher education programs. Specifically, the current legislation does not allow UH Special Education programs to prepare special education teachers to conduct behavioral assessment or to design and implement interventions based in applied behavior analysis. Without applied behavior analysis in their training, special education teacher candidates who graduate from UHM and other state approved programs will not meet state licensing requirements (they will not be completing an accredited program) and will not be prepared to pass the Praxis state licensing exam which includes questions on applied behavior analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chase Bank Arbitration Agreement
    Chase Bank Arbitration Agreement Inorganically sepia, Alphonso tweedle slatiness and mithridatise rouser. Rescissory and perforable Miguel heats, but Raj unexploited?hungrily escalades her Patmore. When Plato contains his homesickness attacks not equivocally enough, is Yankee Would stop you change was denied, chase arbitration process payments Please share this letter with other Chase customers so they can also opt out of the Chase binding arbitration agreement. We need only for comment on the amount from enforcing any practice for certain claims must request has been affirmed that not impact related matters and from debit transaction. Then search and. All account holders can opt out of this specific clause in their contract by mailing a request to the bank. The exception is if the matter could be resolved in small claims court. Claim relating to this prevent, the Service retrieve a transaction. You work all chase bank arbitration agreement? For an optimal experience visit below site with another browser. How Chase Cardholders Can Opt out twenty New Binding Arbitration. Chase JPM 27 is re-introducing forced arbitration clauses to gamble of its. You must return the Card if we request that you do so. Seller engages in conduct that creates or could tend to create harm or loss to the goodwill of any Card Brand, WFMS, or Square, or which otherwise may impose undue risk of harm to any Card Brand, WFMS or Square. If you change your form of ownership or authorized signers, you must notify us when the change occurs. Just called in, CSR said they will close my cab if she reject.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical.Pdf
    DTC PARTICPANT REPORT (Numerical Sort ) Month Ending - July 31, 2021 NUMBER PARTICIPANT ACCOUNT NAME 0 SERIES 0005 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. LLC 0010 BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO. 0013 SANFORD C. BERNSTEIN & CO., LLC 0015 MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC 0017 INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC 0019 JEFFERIES LLC 0031 NATIXIS SECURITIES AMERICAS LLC 0032 DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.- STOCK LOAN 0033 COMMERZ MARKETS LLC/FIXED INC. REPO & COMM. PAPER 0045 BMO CAPITAL MARKETS CORP. 0046 PHILLIP CAPITAL INC./STOCK LOAN 0050 MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC 0052 AXOS CLEARING LLC 0057 EDWARD D. JONES & CO. 0062 VANGUARD MARKETING CORPORATION 0063 VIRTU AMERICAS LLC/VIRTU FINANCIAL BD LLC 0065 ZIONS DIRECT, INC. 0067 INSTINET, LLC 0075 LPL FINANCIAL LLC 0076 MUFG SECURITIES AMERICAS INC. 0083 TRADEBOT SYSTEMS, INC. 0096 SCOTIA CAPITAL (USA) INC. 0099 VIRTU AMERICAS LLC/VIRTU ITG LLC 100 SERIES 0100 COWEN AND COMPANY LLC 0101 MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC/SL CONDUIT 0103 WEDBUSH SECURITIES INC. 0109 BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO./ETF 0114 MACQUARIE CAPITAL (USA) INC. 0124 INGALLS & SNYDER, LLC 0126 COMMERZ MARKETS LLC 0135 CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC/INVESTMENT ACCOUNT 0136 INTESA SANPAOLO IMI SECURITIES CORP. 0141 WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES, LLC 0148 ICAP CORPORATES LLC 0158 APEX CLEARING CORPORATION 0161 BOFA SECURITIES, INC. 0163 NASDAQ BX, INC. 0164 CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. 0166 ARCOLA SECURITIES, INC. 0180 NOMURA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. 0181 GUGGENHEIM SECURITIES, LLC 0187 J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC 0188 TD AMERITRADE CLEARING, INC. 0189 STATE STREET GLOBAL MARKETS, LLC 0197 CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO. / CANTOR CLEARING SERVICES 200 SERIES 0202 FHN FINANCIAL SECURITIES CORP. 0221 UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
    [Show full text]