DOCSLIB.ORG

Peelhouses Farm, Lockerbie

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peelhouses Farm, Lockerbie Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal Underbarrow Road, Kendal Issue Date- May 20th 2016 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 PDP Associates is a landscape architectural practice, based in Cumbria, with experience in landscape and visual impact assessment for a variety of clients, ranging from residential developers to local authorities. Recent studies include an assessment of potential development parcels as part of the evidence base for Eden District Council’s Local Development Framework. Eden District is a sparsely populated rural area in Cumbria which includes parts of the Lake District National Park and The North Pennines Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. 1.2 The study has been prepared by Piers Palmer, who holds an Honours Degree and Post-Graduate Degree in Landscape Architecture, has 18 years’ professional experience and is a Licentiate Member of the Landscape Institute. 1.3 PDP Associates has been commissioned by Oakmere Homes and Russell Armer to carry out a landscape and visual impact assessment on parcel of land off Underbarrow Road, Kendal. Figure 1 – Site location plan (Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 0031673) 1.4 The site covers approximately 6.5ha of predominantly pasture fields separated by dry stone walls with mature trees along the northern and eastern boundaries and within the site. The western boundary partially abuts the Lake District National Park boundary. Underbarrow Road, Kendal Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal 2 1.5 The following assessment is based on current detailed proposals for the site which incorporates design elements and landscape mitigation features in response to the Development Brief prepared by South Lakeland District Council. A landscape masterplan; drawing number c-1267-01c, has also been prepared. 1.6 The proposed development comprises residential properties with internal roads, lighting, parking areas, public open space and landscape works. A tree belt will be planted along the western site boundary. The site will be accessed off Underbarrow Road. Existing mature trees will be generally retained except where recommendations have been made for felling in the Tree Report. Existing stone walls will be generally retained and incorporated within the development except where a new access is required off Underbarrow Road. 1.7 The assessment of landscape and visual effects necessarily involves an element of subjectivity on the part of the assessor. Professional judgement, taking into account a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors, is now widely accepted as best practice for assessing effects on landscape character and on visual amenity. This approach is recommended by the Landscape Institute/Institute of Environmental Assessment Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (GLVIA) and also by the Countryside Agency/Scottish Natural Heritage Landscape Character Assessment Guidance. The guidance provided in these documents has informed the study methodology and the preparation of the baseline and impact assessments. 1.8 This report has been amended following comments by South Lakeland District Council including annotation of viewpoint photographs, a relocation of one viewpoint (viewpoint 15) and an additional viewpoint (viewpoint 10). The viewpoints are also now presented on A3 sheets. Underbarrow Road, Kendal Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal 3 SECTION 2: METHODOLOGY 2.1 Guidance for the undertaking of this appraisal has been sourced primarily from: The Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (Third Edition), published April 2013 by the Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (hereafter referred to as GLVIA) 2.2 This document describes and considers the potential significant landscape and visual effects arising from the development. The resultant impacts are described as positive or adverse effect although in some instances these effects may be described as neutral. 2.3 The level of assessment is considered to be appropriate to the scale and nature of the development. Landscape effects are defined as changes to landscape elements, characteristics, character, and qualities of the landscape as a result of development. Visual effects are a subset of landscape effects and relate to the changes that arise in the composition of views as a result of changes to the landscape, to people’s responses to the changes, and to the overall effects with respect to visual amenity. 2.4 The approach adopted in this study for assessing landscape sensitivity and capacity follows current recommendations in the latest edition of the GLVIA. It assumes from the outset that even though a landscape may be designated or protected, the landscape does not automatically have a high landscape and visual sensitivity, especially where there may be specific local factors which would mitigate potential landscape and visual effects. Furthermore, even some sensitive areas may not automatically have no or low capacity to accept change. 2.5 The identification of areas of high sensitivity does not necessarily mean that all development would be unacceptable. Similarly, areas of low or medium sensitivity will not necessarily be able to accommodate any or all types of development. Local conditions, site and development detailed design, mitigation and cumulative impacts must also be considered. 2.6 The study area was largely defined by the extent of land within which the site is theoretically visible and which would potentially experience significant landscape and visual effects, i.e. the Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV). Where appropriate, the study area was extended beyond the ZTV to show the wider landscape/urban context and connectivity. 2.7 For the purpose of this assessment, the ZTV was established through field work. In this instance, field survey was considered to be the most reliable technique as alternative computer models would not accurately reflect the screening benefits of individual trees, woodland and extensive stone walls and hedgerows, all of which have a significant visual effect in limiting views towards the assessment site. The field work to identify the ZTV was undertaken in November 2014, when most vegetation not in full leaf. Analysis of local viewpoints suggests that the extent of the ZTV would not significantly change reduce during summer months however, it would be expected that the potential visibility of the site within the ZTV would reduce Underbarrow Road, Kendal Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal 4 with the benefit of full leaf cover. SECTION 3: APPRAISAL CRITERIA Landscape appraisal 3.1 An assessment of landscape effects deals with the effects of change and development on landscape as a resource. This includes how the proposal will affect the elements that make up the landscape, the aesthetic and perceptual aspects of the landscape and its distinctive character. 3.2 An appraisal of landscape sensitivity is made by combining professional judgements in relation to the susceptibility of the landscape to change (particular to the proposed development type) and the value of the landscape receptor. 3.3 Professional judgements are made in relation to the susceptibility of the landscape receptor to change. This is the capacity of a landscape receptor to accommodate the proposed development without undue consequences for the maintenance of the baseline situation and/or the achievement of landscape planning policies and strategies (whether the landscape receptor be the overall character of a particular landscape type/area, or an individual element/feature or designation within it). 3.4 Judgements in relation to the value of the landscape receptor should reflect; The value of the landscape character types or areas that may be affected based on a review of any designations at both national and local levels. Where there are no designations, judgements are based on criteria that can be used to establish landscape value. The value of individual contributors to landscape character, especially key characteristics, which may include individual elements of the landscape, particular landscape features, notable aesthetic, perceptual or experiential qualities, and combinations of these contributors. 3.5 The appraisal of value is based on professional judgement and should also include consideration of factors such as; Landscape quality (condition): A measure of the physical state of the landscape. It may include the extent to which typical character is represented in individual areas, the intactness of the landscape and the condition of individual elements. Scenic Quality: The term used to describe landscapes that appeal primarily to the senses (primarily but not wholly the visual senses). Rarity: The presence of rare elements or features in the landscape or the presence of a rare Landscape Character Type. Representativeness: Whether the landscape contains a particular character and/or features or elements which are considered particularly important examples. Conservation Interests: The presence of features of wildlife, earth science or archaeological or historic and cultural interest can add to Underbarrow Road, Kendal Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal 5 the value of the landscape as well as having value in their own right. Recreational Value: Evidence that the landscape is valued for recreational activity where experience of the landscape is important. Perceptual Aspects: A landscape may be valued for its perceptual qualities, notably wildness and / or tranquility. Cultural Associations: Some landscapes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Cumbria Water Supplies Project – Thirlmere Transfer United Utilities Plc
    West Cumbria Water Supplies Project – Thirlmere Transfer United Utilities plc Planning, Design and Access Statement Revision | 1 24 March 2016 Planning, Design and Access Statement West Cumbria Water Supplies – Thirlmere Transfer Project no: B2707061 Document title: Planning, Design and Access Statement Revision: 1 Date: 24 March, 2016 Client name: United Utilities plc Jacobs U.K. Limited 5 First Street Manchester M15 4GU United Kingdom T +44 (0)161 235 6000 F +44 (0)161 235 6001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2016 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. ii Planning, Design and Access Statement Contents Executive Summary ...................... ....................................................................................................................vii 1. Background and Approach .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ......................... ................... ................... ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Core Strategy
    South Lakeland Local Development Framework Draft Core Strategy JULY 2009 Lawrence Conway, Corporate Director (Community), South Lakeland District Council www.southlakeland.gov.uk/ldf Alternative formats of this document are available by calling 01539 733333 ext.7102 FOREWORD South Lakeland’s superb natural setting shapes the district’s image and plays a major role in its development, making it a very attractive location for residents and visitors alike. However, while the district can offer a quality of life that is second to none, it does experience problems common to many rural areas. There is a need to deliver more balanced communities and reduce inequality, including reducing dependency on high-level services and jobs in towns outside the district, increasing provision of affordable housing and developing and maintaining high-quality modern sustainable transport networks. We must also meet challenging targets laid down by central government, most notably for house building. The challenge is to secure a sustainable level and pattern of development that creates balanced communities and meets local needs whilst protecting the environment that makes the district special. The Core Strategy document sets out the development strategy for South Lakeland outside the National Park areas up to 2025. It is a long-term plan. It draws together strategies of the council and other organisations whose activities have implications for the development and use of land. It puts the aspirations of the Sustainable Community Strategy into effect – seeking to create a sustainable district that is the best possible place to live, work and visit. We are inviting representations from everybody with an interest in the future of our district.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 Joint Consultation Response Executive Summary
    NORTH WEST COAST CONNECTIONS VOLUME 1 JOINT CONSULTATION RESPONSE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Final Submission Prepared on behalf of the PPA Group Authorities 27th January 2017 Lakeland Business Park, Lamplugh Road, Cockermouth, Cumbria, CA13 0QT Tel: +44 (0)1900 898 600 Fax: +44 (0)1900 826 324 Email: Website: www.wyg.com Registered Office: Volume 1 Joint Consultation Response Executive Summary – Final Submission Document control Document: VOLUME 1 JOINT CONSULTATION RESPONSE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project: North West Coast Connections Client: PPA Group Authorities Job Number: A072895 File Origin: RevB Date: 21 December 2016 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Peter Shannon Graham Hale Cumbria County Council Description of revision: Internal Comments Revision: RevD – Submission Draft Date: 6 January 2017 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Peter Shannon John Leggett John Leggett Description of revision: Final PPA Group Comments Revision: RevF – Final Submission Date: 26 January 2017 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Peter Shannon Graham Hale Graham Hale Description of revision: Additional PPA Group Comments www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Volume 1 Joint Consultation Response Executive Summary – Final Submission Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Cross-Cutting Issues .............................................................................................. 3 2.1 Consultation ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final DMP 2012-2014
    DESTINATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012 - 2014 Destination Management Plan: The Visitor Economy Action Plan for Cumbria 2012-14 Contents: Page: 3 1. Introduction 2. Process and Partnership 4 3. Strategic Framework 3.1 VisitEngland: A Strategic Framework for Tourism 2010-2020 5 3.2 The Tourism Strategy for Cumbria 2008-18, Making The Dream A Reality: 6 3.3 The 2030 Vision for the Lake District National Park 8 4. Tourism Volume and Value 4.1 Tourism in the UK 4.2 Tourism in the North West 4.3 Tourism in Cumbria 13 5. Industry Performance 5.1 Tourism Business Survey March 2012 15 5.2 Occupancy Surveys 16 5.3 Visitor Attractions 17 6. Consumer Trends and Market Forecasts 19 7. Tourism Challenges and Opportunities 20 7.1 VisitEngland Regional Growth Fund - Growing Tourism Locally 7.2 RDPE and the Rural Economy Grant 22 8. Targets and Performance Indicators 22 9. Future Investments and Plans - Priorities for Action 24 9.1 Major Tourism Investment Proposals 26 Tourism Investment Proposals - Details 26 1. Barrow and South Lakeland 35 2. Western Lakes 47 3. Eden 53 4. Carlisle and Hadrian’s Wall 61 Countywide/LDNPA 67 Appendix 1: Consultees 68 Appendix 2: Criteria for Appraisal and Prioritisation This Plan was prepared in association with Helen Tate of Red Research, [email protected] tel 07940 290682 2 Destination Management Plan: The Visitor Economy Action Plan for Cumbria 2012-14 1. Introduction Although prepared by Cumbria Tourism, The Destination Management Plan [DMP] is an action plan for all the public and private sector organisations involved in delivering the visitor experience in Cumbria [as distinct from the Business Plan of Cumbria Tourism].
    [Show full text]
  • Kendal - the Dun Horse Inn, 5 Stramongate LA9 4BH Free-Of-Tie Public House to Rent Kendal - the Dun Horse Inn, 5 Stramongate LA9 4BH Free-Of-Tie Public House to Rent
    Kendal - The Dun Horse Inn, 5 Stramongate LA9 4BH Free-of-Tie Public House to Rent Kendal - The Dun Horse Inn, 5 Stramongate LA9 4BH Free-of-Tie Public House to Rent Property Features ▪ Comprises public house with four letting rooms and two-bedroom owner`s accommodation ▪ The property benefits from rear yard and full commercial kitchen ▪ Comes fully furnished as seen on pictures ▪ VAT is applicable to this property ▪ Total area size 513 sq m (5,522 sq ft) ▪ Flexible terms to fit your needs ▪ Rated 4 /5 stars on Google Maps, Tripadvisor, Facebook ▪ Available from 11.03.2021 ▪ Occupiers close by include Subway, Nationwide, The Works, amongst other restaurants and local shops Property Description: The ground floor consists of a central entrance off the main street into a main open split level open-plan lounge and public bars (50ppl), served by a centrally located wooden bar servery. Rear porch providing access to the enclosed rear yard. Full commercial kitchen (equipped). Separate double-bedroom owner's accommodation including a separate lounge and residential kitchen. Also includes letting accommodation opportunity with four good sized bedrooms (communal showers), and a further 3 bedrooms within the roof void. Kendal - The Dun Horse Inn, 5 Stramongate LA9 4BH Free-of-Tie Public House to Rent Location: Kendal is a market town and civil parish, 8 miles south-east of Windermere and 19 miles north of Lancaster. Kendal railway station lies on the Windermere Branch Line, with connections to Windermere to the north, and to Oxenholme Lake District station (on the West Coast Main Line) and Lancaster railway station to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 71 October 2013
    Number 71 FellFarerthe October 2013 Editorial CLUB OFFICIALS Sometimes you get a photograph that you know just has to be the front page picture. PRESIDENT: Gordon Pitt Tel: 015395 68210 Sometimes you don’t and you struggle to find VICE PRESIDENT: Roger Atkinson Tel: 01539732490 any reasonable picture that will do. Then , perversely, they seem to come along like buses TRUSTEES Vicky Atkinson Tel: 07971 408378 - too many all at the same time. Mick Fox Tel: 01539 727531 Cheryl Smallwood Tel: 01629 650164 That’s how it was this time; I had several Mark Walsh Tel: 01606 891050 photographs that would have all made great front cover shots. So which one to choose? COMMITTEE Well, most of the contenders were of the Chairman: Roger Atkinson Tel: 01539 732490 198, Burneside Road Shinscrapers on the crags around Kendal on Kendal LA96EB Thursday evenings but there was just this one, email: [email protected] a happy accident, taken in the dark at the campsite on the shore of Ullswater. I asked Vice Chairman: Mark Walsh Tel: 01606 891050 20, Knutsford Road the Secretary to choose and she answered Antrobus without hesitation. I was pleased. She was Northwich right so I used it. Cheshire CW9 6JW Thanks you to this issue’s contributers : email: [email protected] John Peat, Paul East, Sarah, Matt and Emma Secretary: Clare Fox Tel: 01539 727531 Jennings, Helen Speed, Alec Reynolds, Joan 50, Gillinggate Abbot, David Birkett, Ruth Joyce, Peter and Kendal Nat Blamire LA94JB email: [email protected] Ed. Cover Photograph: Treasurer: Val Calder Tel: 01539727109 Jess Walsh and Kirsten Ball toasting marshmallows, 86, Vicarage Drive The Water Weekend Kendal LA95BA Side Farm Campsite.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Streets Consultation Full Report
    Clean Streets Consultation Full Report November 2012 This report summarises the results of the Clean Streets Consultation conducted via a self completion and online survey carried out between 2 July and 24 September 2012. Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................... 3 Method .................................................................................................. 3 Respondents ........................................................................................ 5 Headline Summary ............................................................................... 6 Dog Control Orders ..................................................................................................................... 6 Fouling of Land by Dogs Order .................................................................................................. 6 Dogs on Leads by Direction Order ............................................................................................. 8 Dog Exclusion Order .................................................................................................................. 9 Dogs on Leads Order .............................................................................................................. 10 Public Urination and Defecation in the Street ......................................................................... 12 Respondents Profile ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kendal Fellwalkers Programme Summer 2015 Information From: Secretary 01539 720021 Or Programme Secretary 01524 762255
    Kendal Fellwalkers Programme Summer 2015 Information from: Secretary 01539 720021 or Programme Secretary 01524 762255 www.kendalfellwalkers.co.uk Date Grade Area of Walk Leader Time at Starting Point Grid Time Kendal Ref. walk starts 05/04/2015 A Mardale round (Naddle, Margaret 08:30 Burnbanks NY508161 09:10 Kidsty Pike, Wether Hill) Lightburn (16mi 4300ft) B Murton Pike, High Cup Nick, Ken Taylor 08:30 Murton CP NY730220 09:40 Maize Beck, Scordale (13mi 3000ft) C Kirkby Malham, Gordale Chris Lloyd 08:30 Verges at Green Gate 09:30 Scar, Malham Tarn (10mi (near Kirkby Malham) 1600ft) SD897611 12/04/2015 A The Four Passes (14mi Chris Michalak 08:30 Seathwaite Farm 09:45 6000ft) NY235122 B Grange Fell, High Spy, Janet & Derek 08:30 Layby on B5289 N of 09:35 Maiden Moor, lakeshore Capper bridge, Grange-in- (11.5mi 3700ft) Borrowdale NY256176 C White Gill, Yewdale Fells, Dudley 08:30 Roadside beyond 09:15 Wetherlam, Black Sails (8mi Hargreaves Ruskin Museum 2800ft) SD301978 19/04/2015 A Staveley to Pooley Bridge Conan Harrod 08:30 Staveley (Wilf's CP) 08:45 (Sour Howes, Ill Bell, High SD471983 Street) (21.5mi 5100ft) (Linear walk. Please contact leader in advance.) B Three Tarns (Easdale, Stickle, Steve Donson 08:30 Layby on A591 north of 09:10 Lingmoor) and Silver How Swan Inn, Grasmere (13mi 4600ft) NY337086 C Bowscale Fell, Bannerdale Alison Gilchrist 08:30 Mungrisdale village hall 09:20 Crags, Souther Fell (7mi NY363302 2000ft) 26/04/2015 A Lingmell via Piers Gill, Jill Robertson 08:30 Seathwaite Farm 09:45 Scafell Pike, Glaramara (12mi
    [Show full text]
  • February 2008: the Christmas Issue. New Year, New Races
    NewsieBlack Combe Runners February 2008: the Christmas issue. New year, new races. New beer. It came as a shock when Will asked me for some words for the Newsie, as I was now Club Captain, but knowing I can’t wriggle out, here they are. Firstly, thanks to those at the AGM for your show of faith in me seeing that I’ve only been in the club a year, and thanks to Penny for her support as Captain. Both Hazel and I have been really pleased with the reception and friendliness of all in the club over the last year and it has made a huge difference to the enjoyment we’ve had running. We all run for fun, for some it is running and chatting on a Tuesday night, for others it is racing and drinking as much as is financially viable at the weekend. Our aim has to be to maintain this and help people to take part and stretch themselves when and where they want to. This photograph was taken by Dave Watson. That’s the only explanation I can offer. Ed. The winter league races, excellently organised by Val with her mallet, have attracted a lot of interest with 26 people We had 9 wanting to run last year so it’s a reasonable having competed in the first four races, most having hope. As a number of us found out in running it for the run two or more. The overall result is still wide open, first time in 2007, it’s a great team day out, with a little particularly as Val hasn’t told us how she will handicap us running thrown in and a few beers afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Written Description of the Boundary Relating to the Lake
    Written Description of the Boundary relating to the Lake District National Park (Designation) (Variation)Confirmation Order 2015 Introduction This description is designed to be read in conjunction with the 1:25,000 scale maps included within the Lake District National Park (Designation) (Variation) Confirmation Order 2015 as confirmed by the Secretary of State on the 23rd day of October 2015. It does not form part of the Order but is intended to assist interpretation of the map against features on the ground. Map references in italics refer to the map numbers in the top right corner of the maps bound in with the Order. Map references within the text e.g. NY542011 are six figure Ordnance Survey Grid References. The description of the boundary proceeds round the area of the boundary variations in an anti-clockwise direction (in line with the direction of the text in the original boundary description which accompanied the 1951 Lake District National Park Designation Order), from the point at which it deviates from the original boundary, to the point at which it re-joins it, for both the southern and eastern variations to the boundary. In line with the description of the 1951 boundary, and unless otherwise stated: where the boundary follows roads and tracks, it follows the edge of the metalled surface of the road and the edge of the track, excluding the roads and tracks themselves; and in the case of water courses, if it is not stated whether the boundary follows the edge or the centre, the boundary follows the centre of the water course (although in this description the edge of water courses is generally stated).
    [Show full text]
  • Morecambe Bay Estuaries and Catchments
    Morecambe Bay estuaries and catchments The group of estuaries that comprise Morecambe Bay form the largest area of intertidal mudflats and sands in the UK. The four rivers discharging into the bay are the Leven (with Crake) and Kent (with Bela) in the North, and Lune and Wyre in the East (Figure 1). Fig 1. The four contributory areas of the estuarine system of Morecambe Bay in Northwest England (below) of the Leven, Kent, Lune and Wyre rivers (left). The neighbouring rivers of the Ribble and South West Lakes region are also shown1 The Leven and Kent basins cover over 1,000 km2 (1,426 km2 when grouped with the neighbouring River Duddon), the Lune 1,223 km2 and Wyre 450 km2, with all draining into Morecambe Bay between the towns of Barrow-in-Furness in the Northwest and Blackpool in the South. The city of Lancaster and towns of Ulverston, Broughton-in-Furness, Ambleside, Windermere, Bowness-on- Windermere, Grange-over-Sands, Sedburgh, Kendal, Kirkby Lonsdale, Ingleton, Carnforth, Morecambe, Garstang, Fleetwood and Blackpool lie within the basins. Leven and Kent basins: River Leven is sourced on both Bow Fell (902 m) at the head of the Langdale Valley and Dollywagon Pike (858 m) above Dunmail Raise. These fells comprise of volcanic rocks of the Borrowdale Volcanic Group that characterise the central Cumbrian Mountains. The source on Bow Fell is only 3 km from the wettest place in the UK with the Sprinkling Tarn raingauge recording 6,528 mm in 1954. Both tributary streams flow through Lake Windermere (Fig. 2) that is England’s largest lake with a surface area of 14.7 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Helm Hill Senior Club Championship
    Helm Hill Runners Spring Newsletter 2016 CHAIRMAN’S BIT—TIM MURRAY hanks to all those who have contributed to this newsletter……..another hectic start to T the year for the Helm Hill! Thanks also to everyone who helped out with another record breaking year in the Winter League. Great to see so many runners from Helm and other clubs enjoying this fantastic series of races. It looks as if we may have outgrown at least one venue (Fairmile) because of the number of people racing so if anyone else has any ideas for new races with good parking let us know! All the Winter League race organisers will be getting together soon over pie and peas (and possibly a drink) to look at anything we need to differently next year. All suggestions welcome. It’s been great to see the famous Helm Hill vest out in force at so many races this year…….the #greenmachine is certainly getting noticed particularly at junior and senior championship races. 28 runners made the trip to Car- nethy, 30 to Black Combe, 18 crossed the water to Ireland, 55 were at Loughrigg and 34 juniors raced at Todd Crag. If anyone is thinking of travelling to races for the first time, don’t worry, you will be in good company! Helm Hill members have also been involved in other exciting challenges. Well done to Carrie G for completing the infamous Marathon des Sables and Rowan R for completing the London Marathon in a great time. Good luck to Fiona P with her BG in June and the Helm Hill women taking part in the Billy Bland challenge later this year.
    [Show full text]