2012 Geomorphology Brahmap
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
GEOMOR-03977; No of Pages 12 Geomorphology xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Tectonic controls on the morphodynamics of the Brahmaputra River system in the upper Assam valley, India Siddhartha K. Lahiri a,b,⁎, Rajiv Sinha a a Engineering Geosciences Group, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India b Department of Applied Geology, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh 786004, India article info abstract Article history: The Brahmaputra is one of the largest tropical rivers of the world and is located in an area of high structural Received 28 May 2011 instability as evidenced from the presence of a large number of earthquakes in the Himalayan catchment Received in revised form 10 April 2012 through which it flows. Syntectonic evidence of changes in the morphodynamics is difficult to identify for Accepted 11 April 2012 the large rivers. Nevertheless, we note that the Brahmaputra River has become astonishingly large in plan- Available online xxxx form in a historical timescale. Reconstruction of planform changes over a period of 90 years in the upper reaches of the Assam valley shows that the 240-km-long channel belt is widening all along its course in Keywords: Himalayan tectonics the region. From the average width of 9.74 km in 1915, the channel belt has widened to the average width Indo-Burmese Arc of 14.03 km in 2005 (44% widening), and in certain reaches the average widening is as high as 250%. However, River dynamics the bank line shift is not symmetric along both banks. Further, the planform characteristics of the Brahmaputra River reveal significant spatial and temporal variability from upstream to downstream reaches, and we attribute this variability to tectonogeomorphic zonation of the river based on subsurface configuration and channel slope. Further, the tributaries joining the northern and southern banks of the Brahmaputra differ remarkably in terms of river dynamics, and this is attributed to the differences in tectonic regimes of the Himalaya in the north and the Naga Patkai hills in the south. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction In contrast, the upper reaches of the river in Assam have received inadequate attention so far (Goswami, 1985; Sarma and Phukan, 2004, The Brahmaputra is a large mountain-fed river system (Sinha and 2006; Kotoky et al., 2005; Sarma, 2005). The Brahmaputra River divides Friend, 1994) draining the tectonically active Himalayan foreland the upper Assam valley into two distinct geographic zones, the north basin through Assam (India) and Bangladesh and has the distinction and the south banks. In addition, this reach of the river hosts one of of being the river with the highest sediment yield (852.4 t/km2/y; the largest alluvial islands in the world, the Majuli Island, which is Latrubesse, 2008) in the world. The Brahmaputra acts like an efficient known for its unique cultural heritage (Sarma and Phukan, 2004) conduit to transfer a large sediment flux from the Himalaya (the source) apart from its geomorphic significance. The Brahmaputra River shows (Singh, 2006; Singh et al., 2006)totheBayofBengal(thesink). With significant geomorphic diversity in this region, which is strongly mani- a mean annual discharge of 21,200 m3/s, measured at Bahadurabad, fested in the morphodynamics of the river at a historical timescale. Bangladesh (Latrubesse, 2008), the Brahmaputra is the seventh largest Moreover, the tributaries joining the main river from these two banks river in the world (Hovius, 1998; Tandon and Sinha, 2007) and has are quite different in terms of their morphometric characteristics and created a thick and extensive valley fill in its alluvial reach. The large- temporal dynamics. The present study documents the spatial diversity scale dynamics of the Brahmaputra River has fascinated geomorpholo- in morphodynamics of the Brahmaputra River in the upper Assam val- gists across the globe for over three decades; and a large number of ley as well as the tributaries joining the northern and southern banks. studies, particularly in the lower reaches of the river in Bangladesh, We argue that such spatial variability in morphodynamics has been bear testimony to the international attention this river has received strongly influenced by different tectonic domains in this region. (see Coleman, 1969; Bristow, 1987; Curray, 1994; Goodbred and Kuehl, 1998, 2000; Richardson and Thorne, 2001; Goodbred et al., 2. The study area 2003). The study area includes a 240-km×80-km corridor in the Brahma- putra valley that is sandwiched between the NE–SW bound Himalayan ⁎ Corresponding author at: Department of Applied Geology, Dibrugarh University, frontal thrust (HFT) and the Naga-Patkai thrust (NPT) (Fig. 1A, B). The Dibrugarh 786004, India. Tel.: +91 373 2370247; fax: +91 373 2370323. older topographic maps suggest that three rivers (the Siang, the Dibang, E-mail address: [email protected] (S.K. Lahiri). and the Lohit) used to meet at a place called Kobo to form the 0169-555X/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.012 Please cite this article as: Lahiri, S.K., Sinha, R., Tectonic controls on the morphodynamics of the Brahmaputra River system in the upper As- sam valley, India, Geomorphology (2012), doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.012 2 S.K. Lahiri, R. Sinha / Geomorphology xxx (2012) xxx–xxx 0 1000 km A B Dh Di Ti NL Si Legend Prominent thrusts Blind thrusts Jo Faults Places Study area Fig. 1. (A) Three major reaches of the Brahmaputra River and the valley shown by encircled numbers: I, the upper Assam reach; II, the lower Assam reach and III, the Bangladesh reach. (B) The study area in the upper reach of the Brahmaputra valley with three distinct units is shown on the IRS-P6-LISS-3 image. Unit 1 is from the oldconfluence of three rivers: the Lohit, the Dibang, and the Siang to Dibrugarh in the downstream direction. Comparatively steady, unit 2 continues up to the upper tip of Majuli Island. Segment 3 includes Majuli Island and extends towards the Mikir hills. Abbreviated place names are Dh — Dhemaji; Di — Dibrugarh; Ti — Tinsukia; Si — Sibsagar; NL — North Lakhimpur; Jo — Jorhat. Brahmaputra during 1915. This confluence point shifted by ~16 km multipattern river that has a tendency to very frequently generate an downstream to a place called Laikaghat by 1975. By 2005, a farther down- anabranching (Latrubesse, 2008) pattern in decadal scale. stream shift of 19 km took place as observed in the satellite imagery. Fig. 1B shows the tectonic setting of the study area. Apart from the Though the Brahmaputra has been described as a braided river, the regional-scale thrusts such as the MBT (Main Boundary Thrust), HFT, conventional definitions for braided rivers (Lane, 1957; Leopold and and NPT, several other faults have been mapped in this region based Wolman, 1957; Bristow, 1987) as anastomosing channels or the pres- on the interpretation of seismic data acquired by the oil companies ence of a number of bars and islands having an intertwining association (Murty, 1983; Ranga Rao, 1983; Bally, 1997; Narula et al., 2000; with channels is not adequate to describe it. In the study reach of the Kent et al., 2002; Goswami and Goswami, 2007). Some of these faults upper Assam area, the Brahmaputra appears to be a multichannel and are trending in the NE–SW direction and others are crisscrossing them. Please cite this article as: Lahiri, S.K., Sinha, R., Tectonic controls on the morphodynamics of the Brahmaputra River system in the upper As- sam valley, India, Geomorphology (2012), doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.012 S.K. Lahiri, R. Sinha / Geomorphology xxx (2012) xxx–xxx 3 A Bankline shift (km) B D C Fig. 2. The bank lines and the nature of the bankline shift of the channel belt of the Brahmaputra River are shown during three different times over the last 90 years (1915–2005). AB H1 Unit 1 L1 Mean elevation = 114m H2 Mean slope = 0.35m/km H3 L2 Unit 2 H4 H5 Mean elevation = 98m L3 Mean slope = 0.25m/km L4 L5 Unit 3 Mean elevation = 77m Mean slope = 0.21m/km Channel belt width (km) Relative widthvariation–1915(%) =((Place width -5.89)/5.89)*100 Av. widthin1915=5.89km Minimum= -66.89304atX = 128.65 Maximum= 56.19694atX = 122.4 UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 Relative width variation–1975(%) =((Place width–8.88)/8.88)*100 NE SW Av. widthin1975 = 8.88km Upstream Downstream Minimum= -70.4955atX = 150.31 Maximum= 49.77477atX = 3.43 Width variability - 1915 Relative width variation–2005(%) Minimum= 2.34atX = 12.65 ((Place width–11.96)/11.96)*100 Maximum= 23.11atX = 146.56 Minimum= -72.15719atX = 152.37 Mean= 9.74 Maximum= 85.45151atX = 4.68 Widthvariability - 1975 (Note: In the above calculations, Minimum= 5.38atX = 236.86 Majuli Maximum= 21.93atX = a 146.56 was excluded from the channel belt. Mean= 11.60 As a result, average width decreased Considerably. For example, average Width variability - 2005 Width with Majuli in 1915 was 9.74km Minimum= 4.71atX = 236.86 C And without Majuli 5.89km) Maximum= 22.54atX = 146.56 Mean= 14.03 UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 NE SW Upstream Downstream Fig. 3. (A) The planform variation in the widths of the channel belt of the Brahmaputra River (Majuli Island included) in three different times and units shown in the location map. (B) Longi- tudinal profile and the channel slopes at different stretches. H — highs, L — lows stand for the geomorphic highs and lows. (C) Relative changes in widths of the channel belt from the average width without the Majuli Island. We observed that the relative changes in widths, planar as well as temporal, show an increasing trend caused by the ‘damming’ effect of the geomorphic highs.