Burning Brown to the Ground

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Burning Brown to the Ground 42 TEACHING TOLERANCE This excerpt was adapted from Dr. Carol Anderson’s book White Rage: The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide. In chapter three, “Burning Brown to the Ground,” Anderson details how white politicians in the North and the South systematically resisted legal demands to desegregate schools, including the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. This excerpt focuses on how state-level resistance played out in the state of Virginia. JIM CROW DOMINATED the lives of black peo- poorly constructed with no indoor plumbing ple in America from 1890 well into the twen- and thus serviced only by outhouses. tieth century. … In the early 1930s, under the In the Deep South, the educational oppor- direction of brilliant legal tactician Charles tunities were at least as bleak. … [In 1941, the Hamilton Houston, the NAACP launched a federal government estimated that it would campaign in the courts to destroy Jim Crow require, in 2014 dollars, $1.2 trillion to equal- and overturn the Plessy v. Ferguson decision ize the schools in America.] The result of such that had made “separate but equal” the legal widespread disparities in funding was that the cornerstone of racial segregation in America. U.S. educational system, despite the demands Virginia, despite being the wealthiest of parents and students craving high-quality Southern state and the fifth richest in the schools, had deliberately produced a sprawl- entire nation, with a constitution and stat- ing, uneducated population that would bedevil utes requiring the provision of public schools the nation well into the twenty-first century. and compulsory attendance, was … deter- In one court case after the next, from 1935 mined not to educate its black population. In to 1950, the NAACP had convincingly demon- Prince Edward County, for example, no high strated that Southern governments were sim- school existed for blacks until 1939, and by ply incapable of meeting Plessy’s Jim Crow 1947 Robert Moton High “was jammed with standard of “separate but equal.” And because more than twice the number of students it the legal bedrock of the South was predicated was designed to hold.” … The other black on that dictum, the proven inability to have schools in Prince Edward County, too, were both equal and separate simultaneously left BY CAROL ANDERSON ILLUSTRATION BY DANIEL ZENDER FALL 2016 43 Dixie in judicial danger, which was just voter registration had been before Brown, powers. Signed by 101 members of Con- as Charles Hamilton Houston intended. it became much more so after the ruling. gress, all from states of the old Confed- With the legal precedent duly laid, … [African American voter registration in eracy—Senator Lyndon Johnson (D-TX) the time to take down Plessy as funda- predominately black counties in Alabama, was one of only a handful of holdouts— mentally unconstitutional was now. for example, ranged from 0 to 0.9 per- the Southern Manifesto signaled to their Houston’s protégé, Thurgood Marshall, cent. In Mississippi, by 1960, 98 percent constituencies that Massive Resistance led the next phase of this legal battle. … In of age-eligible African Americans were to Brown was not some base, primeval December 1952, Marshall argued before not registered to vote.] States relied as well white supremacy but rather a princi- the U.S. Supreme Court that racial seg- upon another mechanism of insidious dis- pled, patriotic stand to defend the Con- regation violated the equal protection crimination … : Legislative apportionment stitution. The Southern Manifesto gave clause of the Fourteenth as well as the due gave overwhelming and disproportionate sanction from the highest levels to use process clause of the Fifth Amendment. power to rural counties, especially those the levers of government to defy the U.S. And with that, a series of legal, political, that held the most ardent white segrega- Supreme Court until, with the federal and cultural explosions went off below tionists and the largest black populations judiciary and African Americans tiring the Mason-Dixon Line … . outside the urban areas. of the fight, Brown simply collapsed. Th[e] day of reckoning came. After On May 31, 1955, the Supreme Court The game plan of stall and defy was nearly sixty years of racial purga- handed down an implementation deci- now in place. Southern states used and tory, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled sion, Brown II, stating that desegrega- abused the legal process to pass one in Brown that Jim Crow schools vio- tion in public schools must happen unconstitutional law after the next, lated the equal protection clause of the “with all deliberate speed.” Recognizing knowing that the process to overturn the Fourteenth Amendment and, in the that disfranchisement and legislative statutes would be costly. [As one segrega- D.C. case [Bolling v. Sharpe, one of five apportionment would not be enough tionist attorney general noted, “As long cases the made up the Brown case], the to stop the progress stemming from as we can legislate, we can segregate.”] ... due process requirement of the Fifth Brown, the Deep South and Virginia Those extended legal battles allowed year Amendment. Even the [NAACP’s] tac- soon added to their arsenals the dis- after year to drizzle by while the contin- iturn Roy Wilkins could barely contain credited legal hocus-pocus of interposi- ued existence of separate and decidedly himself. “May 17, 1954, was one of life’s tion, which argued that the state could unequal schools consigned black chil- sweetest days,” he later recalled. Nor put itself between federal law and U.S. dren to some of the worst education that was the significance of this judgment citizens to stop enforcement of any rul- America had to offer. confined to the education of black chil- ing with which the state disagreed. In Virginia, the birthplace of Massive dren. “If segregation is unconstitutional The so-called Southern Manifesto, Resistance, a full decade after Brown, in educational institutions,” observed however, was the shot heard around only 1.63 percent of blacks were attend- Charles Johnson, president of Fisk America. On March 12, 1956, Represen- ing desegregated schools. ... [W]hen local University, “it is no less so unconstitu- tative Howard Smith (D-VA) and Senator school boards in Charlottesville, Norfolk, tional in other aspects of our national Walter George (D-GA) introduced “the and Front Royal were under federal life.” At that moment, it appeared that Declaration of Constitutional Principles” court orders to admit black students, citizenship—true citizenship—might before their respective chambers in Con- Governor James Lindsay Almond closed, finally be at hand for African Americans. gress, asserting that the Supreme Court in his words, every “school threatened To Southern leaders who had had violated states’ rights, abused judicial with desegregation.” Ironically, because already been readying their politi- authority, and undercut the separation of the white, well-funded schools in those cal arsenal, the decision in Brown was cities matched that description but a declaration of war. Wilkins later (no one was clamoring to inte- admitted, “My sense of euphoria was a grate overcrowded Moton High bit naïve. Swept away, elevated, exalted, in Prince Edward County), he I failed to anticipate the ferocity of the had shut out nearly thirteen resistance that quickly grew up in the thousand white children from Deep South.” There was a “cold, clini- getting an education. cal cruelty of the response.” [T]he Southern states made clear that they were ready for war. The first step was While Brown v. Board initially felt like a to ensure that only those who felt threat- victory for African Americans, it quickly galvanized resistance to racial integration. ened by Brown could vote. … As difficult as ARCHIVE BETTMANN 44 TEACHING TOLERANCE twelfth grade and graduated the lion’s share of them as college-ready. By contrast, an entire generation of black children who had fought long and hard to receive a quality education was School closures spread now to most African American students spent now forced to face this cold, hard new besieged Prince Edward County. This their formative education time in activity economy with neither the necessary time, black children were in the cross- centers that the black community cobbled education nor work skills. It was not just hairs, where they would remain for together. … The resources were simply not black America, however, that suffered nearly a generation. With Brown loom- available to be open more than three days the cost of this waste of human lives and ing over their heads, Virginia’s political a week. … These years had taken a great talent. The brutally relentless tactics officials passed a series of laws to close toll on the children. of stall and defy, then stall and under- the public schools, siphon tax dollars Once again, black parents, with the mine—tactics that went on for at least into private academies, and pay tuition determined Reverend L. Francis Griffin four decades—left the United States with for white students, while ensuring that as the plaintiff, had to haul Virginia back millions of citizens who lacked the educa- there was nothing in place for African to court. But as the Washington Post tion needed to be competitive in a global, American children to continue their reported, when the lawsuits hit, Prince technology-driven economy. This, in turn, education. On November 11, 1955, the Edward County supervisors simply left the United States lagging far behind Gray Commission (named after State “denied that the Virginia constitution other developed countries and placed the Senator Garland Gray) rolled out a requires the operation of public schools nation at enormous economic risk. phalanx of recommendations to keep in any county.” Finally, cutting through African Americans weren’t the only Virginia’s schools separate and unequal.
Recommended publications
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Report: Tough Choices Facing Florida's Governments
    TOUGH CHOICES FACING FLORIDA’S GOVERNMENTS PATTERNS OF RESEGREGATION IN FLORIDA’S SCHOOLS SEPTEMBER 2017 Tough Choices Facing Florida’s Governments PATTERNS OF RESEGREGATION IN FLORIDA’S SCHOOLS By Gary Orfield and Jongyeon Ee September 27, 2017 A Report for the LeRoy Collins Institute, Florida State University Patterns of Resegregation in Florida’s Schools 1 Tough Choices Facing Florida’s Governments TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ..............................................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................3 Patterns of Resegregation in Florida’s Schools .........................................................................................................4 The Context of Florida’s School Segregation.............................................................................................................5 Three Supreme Court Decisions Negatively Affecting Desegregation .......................................................................6 Florida Since the 1990s .............................................................................................................................................7 Overview of Trends in Resegregation of Florida’s Schools ........................................................................................7 Public School Enrollment Trend
    [Show full text]
  • From: What Brown V
    The following is excerpted from: What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: America's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision, Jack M. Balkin, ed. (New York University Press 2001), pp. 3-8. It appeared as an article in the Winter 2002 issue of the Yale Law Report. Brown as Icon In the half century since the Supreme Court's 1954 decision, Brown v. Board of Education has become a beloved legal and political icon. Brown is one of the most famous Supreme Court opinions, better known among the lay public than Marbury v. Madison, which confirmed the Supreme Court's power of judicial review, or McCulloch v. Maryland, which first offered an expansive interpretation of national powers under the Constitution. Indeed, in terms of sheer name recognition, Brown ranks with Miranda v. Arizona, whose warnings delivered to criminal suspects appear on every police show, or the abortion case, Roe v. Wade, which has been a consistent source of political and legal controversy since it was handed down in 1973. Even if Brown is less well known than Miranda or Roe, there is no doubt that it is the single most honored opinion in the Supreme Court's corpus. The civil rights policy of the United States in the last half century has been premised on the correctness of Brown, even if people often disagree (and disagree heatedly) about what the opinion stands for. No federal judicial nominee, and no mainstream national politician today would dare suggest that Brown was wrongly decided. At most they might suggest that the opinion was inartfully written, that it depended too much on social science literature, that it did not go far enough, or that it has been misinterpreted by legal and political actors to promote an unjust political agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Description: All in - Final Picture Lock – Full Film - 200726
    DESCRIPTION: ALL IN - FINAL PICTURE LOCK – FULL FILM - 200726 [01:00:31:00] [TITLE: November 6, 2018] ANCHORWOMAN: It might be a race for the governor’s mansion in Georgia, but this is one that the entire country is watching. ANCHORWOMAN: And if ever one vote counted it certainly is going to count in this particular race. [01:00:46:00] [TITLE: The race for Georgia governor is between Democrat Stacey Abrams and Republican Brian Kemp.] [If elected, Abrams would become the nation’s first female African American governor.] CROWD: Stacey! Stacey! Stacey! Stacey! Stacey! ANCHORWOMAN: The controversy surrounding Georgia’s governor race is not dying down. Both candidates dug in today. ANCHORWOMAN: Republican Brian Kemp and Democrat Stacey Abrams are locked in a virtual dead heat. ANCHORWOMAN: Everybody wants to know what’s happening in Georgia, still a toss up there, as we’re waiting for a number of votes to come in. They believe there are tens of thousands of absentee ballots that have not yet been counted. ANCHORWOMAN: Voter suppression has become a national talking point and Brian Kemp has become a focal point. [01:01:27:00] LAUREN: All of the votes in this race have not been counted. 1 BRIAN KEMP: On Tuesday, as you know, we earned a clear and convincing, uh, victory at the ballot box and today we’re beginning the transition process. ANCHORMAN: Kemp was leading Democratic opponent Stacey Abrams by a narrow margin and it grew more and more narrow in the days following the election. Abrams filed multiple lawsuits, but ultimately dropped out of the race.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgotten Heroes: Lessons from School Integration in a Small Southern Community Whitney Elizabeth Cate East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2012 Forgotten Heroes: Lessons from School Integration in a Small Southern Community Whitney Elizabeth Cate East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Cultural History Commons Recommended Citation Cate, Whitney Elizabeth, "Forgotten Heroes: Lessons from School Integration in a Small Southern Community" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1512. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1512 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Forgotten Heroes: Lessons from School Integration in a Small Southern Community _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in History _____________________ by Whitney Elizabeth Cate December 2012 _____________________ Committee Chair, Dr. Elwood Watson Dr. Emmitt Essin Dr. David Briley Keywords: Integration, Segregation, Brown vs. Board of Education, John Kasper ABSTRACT Forgotten Heroes: Lessons from School Integration in a Small Southern Community by Whitney Elizabeth Cate In the fall of 1956 Clinton High School in Clinton, Tennessee became the first public school in the south to desegregate. This paper examines how the quiet southern town handled the difficult task of forced integration while maintaining a commitment to the preservation of law and order.
    [Show full text]
  • The War on Voting Rights
    The War on Voting Rights John Shattuck Senior Fellow, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy and Professor of Practice in Diplomacy, The Fletcher School, Tufts University Aaron Huang Master in Public Policy Candidate, Harvard Kennedy School Elisabeth Thoreson-Green Master in Public Policy Candidate, Harvard Kennedy School CARR CENTER DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper 2019-003 For Academic Citation: John Shattuck, Aaron Huang and Elisabeth Thoreson-Green. The War on Voting Rights. CCDP 2019-003, February 2019. The views expressed in Carr Center Discussion Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Harvard Kennedy School or of Harvard University. Discussion Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. The War on Voting Rights About the Authors John Shattuck, Professor of Practice in Diplomacy, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University; Senior Fellow, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Harvard Kennedy School; and Visiting Research Scholar, Social Sciences Matrix, University of California Berkeley (Spring 2019) Aaron Huang Master in Public Policy Candidate, Harvard Kennedy School Elisabeth Thoreson-Green Master in Public Policy Candidate, Harvard Kennedy School Carr Center for Human Rights Policy Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.carrcenter.hks.harvard.edu
    [Show full text]
  • Cooper V. Aaron and Judicial Supremacy
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 41 Issue 2 The Ben J. Altheimer Symposium-- Article 11 Cooper v. Aaron: Still Timely at Sixty Years 2019 Cooper v. Aaron and Judicial Supremacy Christopher W. Schmidt Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Christopher W. Schmidt, Cooper v. Aaron and Judicial Supremacy, 41 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 255 (2019). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol41/iss2/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COOPER V. AARON AND JUDICIAL SUPREMACY Christopher W. Schmidt* “[T]he Federal judiciary is supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution.” — Cooper v. Aaron (1958)1 “The logic of Cooper v. Aaron was, and is, at war with the basic principles of democratic government, and at war with the very meaning of the rule of law.” — Attorney General Edwin Meese III (1986)2 I. INTRODUCTION The greatest Supreme Court opinions are complex heroes. They have those attributes that make people recognize them as great: the strategic brilliance and bold assertion of the authority of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison;3 the common-sense refutation of the fallacies that justified racial segregation in Brown v. Board of Education;4 the recognition that something as fundamental as a right to privacy must be a part of our constitutional protections in Griswold v.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis “It's Just a Cross, Don't Shoot”: White Supremacy
    THESIS “IT’S JUST A CROSS, DON’T SHOOT”: WHITE SUPREMACY AND CHRISTONORMATIVITY IN A SMALL MIDWESTERN TOWN Submitted by Kate Eleanor Department of Ethnic Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Colorado State University Fall 2017 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Caridad Souza Co-Advisor: Roe Bubar Courtenay Daum Copyright by Kate Eleanor 2017 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT “IT’S JUST A CROSS, DON’T SHOOT”: WHITE SUPREMACY AND CHRISTONORMATIVITY IN A SMALL MIDWESTERN TOWN This paper, guided by poststructuralist and feminist theories, examines public discourse that emerged in response to a controversy over whether a large cross should be removed from public property in a highly visible location in Grand Haven, Michigan. Situating the controversy within the context of the election of U.S. President Donald J. Trump, this thesis seeks to answer the inquiry: How do the events and discourse surrounding the controversy over a cross on public property in a small, Midwestern city shed light on the Trump phenomenon? A qualitative study using document data was conducted, using grounded theory method to analyze 152 documents obtained from publically accessible sites on the internet. Three conceptual frameworks, Whiteness, Christian hegemony, and spatiality were utilized in evaluating the data. Findings reveal a community that sits at the intersection of White and Christian privileges. So interconnected are these privileges that they create a system of “codominance,” in which they cannot be conceptually separated from one another, and together constitute the necessary criteria for full inclusion in the community. This qualitative study paints a compelling picture of the ways in which racial and religious privilege affect the underlying belief systems of many members of an overwhelmingly White, Christian community.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Trump, and Time
    Controversies in the Making: Race, Trump, and Time Debra Thompson Associate Professor Department of Political Science University of Oregon [email protected] John Meisel Lecture Series in Contemporary Political Controversies Queen’s University Introduction It seems fitting to begin with a controversy. Last July, HBO announced that D.B. Weiss and David Benioff would follow their hit series, Game of Thrones, with a new drama entitled Confederate. It will be set in an alternate timeline in which the southern states did not lose the Civil War, but rather seceded from the Union and formed “a nation in which slavery remains legal and has evolved into a modern institution.”1 The series, they claim, would chronical the events leading up to the “Third American Civil War,” following characters on both sides of the Mason-Dixon Demilitarized Zone, including slave hunters, freedom fighters, journalists, abolitionists, and the executives of a slave-holding conglomerate. In short, the new series will ask, “What would the world look like … if the South had won?”2 Shocking nobody other than the white executives of HBO, who had to put down the piles of money they were holding in order to defensively posture that we should all “reserve judgement 1 Emily Yahr, “‘Game of Thrones’ creators announce new show set in a world where slavery still exists,” Washington Post, July 19, 2017, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and- entertainment/wp/2017/07/19/game-of-thrones-creators-announce-new-show-set-in-a-world-where- slavery-still-exists/?utm_term=.8ba0ba16b409 2 Ta-Nehisi Coates, “The Lost Cause Rides Again,” The Atlantic, August 4, 2017, available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/08/no-confederate/535512/ 1 until there is something to see,”3 the backlash was immediate.
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate Faculty 2001
    BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ADMINISTRATION AND FACULTY · 289 Complete faculty information is available from the Office of the 1989. M.S.N., Mississippi University For Women, 1990. Senior Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs. Ph.D., Georgia State University, 2000. Baek, Chung, 2006. Associate Professor, Dothan. B.S., Yonsei University, 1997. M.S., University of Nebraska-Lincoln, GRADUATE FACULTY 2001. Ph.D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006. Abbey, Robert F., 2002. Associate Professor, Global Campus. Bailey, S. Scott, 2004. Associate Dean, Sorrell College of B.S., University of Oregon, 1969. M.S., Colorado State Business; Associate Professor, Troy. B.S., United States University, 1973. M.P.A., University of Southern California, Military Academy, 1970. M.P.A., University of Colorado at 1982. D.PA., University of Southern California, 1985. Boulder, 1977. M.S., University of Colorado at Boulder, 1981. Ph.D., Colorado School of Mines, 1989. Ai, Chunyu, 2010, Assistant Professor, Troy. B.S., Heilongjiang University - Harbin, China, 2001. M.S., Heilongjiang Bailey, Wendy C., 2005. Associate Professor, Troy. B.S., University - Harbin, China, 2004. M.S., Georgia State Pennsylvania State University, 1982. Ph.D., Colorado School University, 2009. Ph.D., Georgia State University, 2010. of Mines, 1989. Aisami, Riad S., 2003. Associate Professor, Global Campus. Bandow, Diane F., 2002. Professor, Global Campus. B.S., Iowa B.A., Baghdad University, 1980. M.Ed., Tuskegee State University, 1973. M.S., National Louis University, University, 1983. Ph.D., Wayne State University, 1988. 1992. M.A., The Fielding Institute, 1996. Ph.D., The Fielding Institute, 1998. Allard, Catherine L., 1989. Professor, Troy. B.M., SUNY College at Potsdam, 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Intraparty in the US Congress.Pages
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2cd17764 Author Bloch Rubin, Ruth Frances Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ! ! ! ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! by! Ruth Frances !Bloch Rubin ! ! A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley ! Committee in charge: Professor Eric Schickler, Chair Professor Paul Pierson Professor Robert Van Houweling Professor Sean Farhang ! ! Fall 2014 ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! Copyright 2014 by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstract ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Eric Schickler, Chair The purpose of this dissertation is to supply a simple and synthetic theory to help us to understand the development and value of organized intraparty blocs. I will argue that lawmakers rely on these intraparty organizations to resolve several serious collective action and coordination problems that otherwise make it difficult for rank-and-file party members to successfully challenge their congressional leaders for control of policy outcomes. In the empirical chapters of this dissertation, I will show that intraparty organizations empower dissident lawmakers to resolve their collective action and coordination challenges by providing selective incentives to cooperative members, transforming public good policies into excludable accomplishments, and instituting rules and procedures to promote group decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyndon Johnson and Albert Gore
    historian_88.qxp 20/12/2005 12:54 Page 8 Feature Lyndon Johnson and Albert Gore: — PROFESSOR A.J. BADGER Southern New Dealers And The Modern South LBJ and Albert Two Southern New Dealers Gore, Al’s father, Lyndon Johnson and Albert Gore were elected to Congress within a year of each other in helped to 1937-38. They were elected in the old style of patronage-oriented southern Democratic transform the Party politics in which a plethora of candidates, with few issues to divide them, contested Southern States. primary elections. Both circumvented the local county seat elites who usually delivered their counties' votes by taking their case directly to the people, mounting vigorous campaigns to establish their name recognition. Johnson reached out to the tiniest and most isolated communities in his district and completely overturned the 'leisurely pace normal in Texas elections.' Gore played the fiddle with a small band to attract a crowd on Saturday afternoons in courthouse squares across his district. But if they started their political lives in the traditional, old, rural South, their careers – LBJ till he stood down from the Presidency in 1968 in the face of the intractable war in Vietnam, Gore till he was defeated as the no I target of the Nixon Southern Strategy in 1970 – spanned the creation of the modern South. In no small measure they themselves contributed to the collapse of the poor, rural, white supremacy South and the creation of a prosperous, urban, bi-racial South. Their careers saw the replacement of the props that had underpinned
    [Show full text]