Getting Around: a Brief History of Monroeville, Pennsylvania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Getting Around: a Brief History of Monroeville, Pennsylvania Getting Around: A Brief History of Monroeville, Pennsylvania Louis Chandler, Ph.D. Monroeville Historical Society, Monroeville, Pa. April 2012 _____________________________________________________________________ Contact: http://www.monroevillehistorical.org 2 Contents Part 1: The Beginnings Part 2: Paths and Trails Part 3: Waterways, Creeks and Streams Part 4: By Road and Stagecoach Part 5: The Railroads Part 6: The Age of the Automobila Part 7: Public Transit Part 8: And by Air Part 9: Today’s Monroeville Bibliography Appendix: Monroeville’s Time Line 3 Introduction This brief history focuses on travel and transportation. It tells the story of the paths and trails, streams and creeks, roads, and rails, as they led to the dominance of the automobile in today’s Monroeville. This work draws on a number of sources, including regional histories like those of Solon and Elizabeth Buck, as well as the local histories of Monroeville by Marilyn Chandler, Sarah Thompson, and Virginia Etta Myers, all of which helped to provide context. Thanks are due to the staffs of the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh’s Pennsylvania Room, as well as the Monroeville Public Library, and especially Mark Hudson and Marlene Dean; and to Victoria Vargo of the Braddock’s Field Historical Society, and Gary Rogers of the Allegheny Foothills Historical Society; and to Judith Harvey of the Frank B. Fairbanks Archives at the Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation. Historical maps of the area were especially useful in tracing the course of various streams and creeks, and in the following the evolution of the road system. A special note of thanks goes to Lynn Chandler, and to Monroeville’s Director of Community Development, Shelly Kaltenbaugh, and Jamie Storey from the Planning Office, who helped the author make sense of Monroeville’s rich and varied topography. All photos are from the Archives of the Monroeville Historical Society, unless otherwise noted; illustrations are by Rebecca Olson. Finally, the author is especially indebted to the members of the Monroeville Historical Society (most especially: Dan Nowak, Lois Lyman, and Paul Damon) who launched an extensive oral history project in 1986 to help preserve our past. The resulting interviews, give us impressions of what life was like for people facing the everyday problem of “getting around.” Louis Chandler Monroeville Historical Society Monroeville, 2007 4 Getting Around: A History of Monroeville, Pennsylvania Part 1: The Beginnings Civilization follows the waters. It has always been so. The Tigres and Euphrates, the Nile, and the Ganges, and the Yangtze, have all served as cradles of civilization. And so it was to be with the advance of European civilization in the newly-discovered lands that were to become America. The march westward of colonial America may be tracked by the exploration of rivers, their headwaters, their valleys and their tributaries and courses that flowed from one to another, providing a convenient means of travel through the rugged terrain of thick woods and seemingly impenetrable forests. Even formidable obstacles like mountains might be overcome, were river passages through them to be discovered. And it was just such a string of mountains, the Alleghenies, which represented a significant barrier to westward expansion in colonial America. By the 1700s, a conflict was shaping up between France and England over control of the destiny of the new world, and it was the land west of the mountains that was becoming the center of that conflict. The strategic value of the rivers was well- recognized: whoever controlled the rivers would control settlement in the west. In time, it became clear that the key to westward expansion was to be the land at the confluence of three rivers; the place where the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers met to form the Ohio – the place later to be called Pittsburgh. Two routes to Pittsburgh were to emerge. To the north, the French were to descend on the upper Ohio from Canada, moving along the Allegheny River as it headed south toward its meeting with the Monongahela, there to establish Fort Duquesne. Meanwhile from the southeast, the English were to march westward from Virginia to eventually meet the advancing French by entering the three rivers confluence through up the Monongahela valley. These military expeditions left in their wakes a string of fortified encampments, trading posts, and the beginnings of settlements. One of the earliest posts was that of Mrs. Martha Myers, established at the mouth of the Turtle Creek about the time the British first took possession of the territory. George Washington, traveling on horseback and boat through the frontier in 1770 mentions dining at the Widow Myers, -- one of the first references to this pioneering settlement to the east of Fort Pitt. The Martha Myers and her family may have been the first landowners in what was to become Patton Township. In 1880, Eli Meyers, one of her descendents, was to be appointed postmaster in Monroeville, a post he held for many years. 5 Part 2: Paths and Trails By the latter part of the 1700s, Pittsburgh had become a bustling pioneer village with several business houses scattered among the log cabins, showing, even then, the beginnings of homegrown industries. By 1788 it had been designated as the seat of the new county of Allegheny. Settlements sprang up near Pittsburgh to become small villages in themselves, such as Wilkinsburg to the east, already a few scattered log houses and a tavern by the 1780s. But except for the river valleys, the region around, and to the east of Pittsburgh remained sparsely populated, still heavily wooded, with virgin forests largely intact. Among the first families to settle in that region, in what was to become Monroeville, were the Johnstons. They were part of a wave of Scots-Irish immigrants, many of whom, like John Johnston were encouraged by the Pennsylvania authorities to move west over the mountains and settle the frontier. Two brothers, William and Robert had both served in the Revolutionary War. The family’s original log cabin was subsequently burned in an Indian raid. In 1769 Robert Johnston applied for a land grant, and some years later, was awarded his land grant from a grateful government for his wartime service. With the approval of Captain Johnston’s grant in 1789, his family farm was established and it would become a Monroeville fixture -- one that survived and flourished being handed down through several generations well into the 20th century. Like the Johnstons, most of the early settlers were farmers, and they were largely self-sufficient. They had to be. They carved their farms out of the hilly, thickly wooded land, and grew what they needed to survive. There was little surplus crop, as transporting food crops for sale would have been a problem, given the limited transportation of the time. For such settlers like the Johnstons, travel was by foot or on horseback. As there were so few roads, frontiersmen were more likely to follow Indian paths laid down by the Amerind natives. Such trails were not marked, but often well worn by foot traffic; narrow, skirting ridges and avoiding gullies where possible, and crossing streams at the most convenient points. Old Haymaker and Logans Ferry Roads in Monroeville are said to have followed the course of such Indian paths. Both were part of a longer road following the Indian trail that came up from Turtle Creek and crossed through what is now Plum Borough before meeting the Allegheny River at New Kensington. A local ferry, operated by Alexander Logan, took passengers across the river to Springdale in the early 1800s. An early survey of the territory in 1755 had recognized the existing Indian paths, three of which defined the main east-west routes. The northern (sometimes called the Frankstown path after the town where it originated, near modern Holidaysburg) followed the northern branch of the Juniata River across the mountains to the Kiskiminetas River and then up to the Allegheny River north of Pittsburgh. The Pennsylvania canal would later follow a similar path). The central route went from Raystown (modern Bedford) through Shippensburg as it headed west towards Pittsburgh; Forbes trail would later follow a similar route. The southern route went from Frederick, Virginia through Cumberland to meet the Monongahela River at Redstone (modern Brownsville). 6 In 1910, George Donehoo set out to follow the old Indian trails wending his ways west through Western Pennsylvania, and his observations give us a hint of what it was like to follow frontier paths that were nothing more than: “…trails through the tree-covered valleys and over the rugged mountains. Far sweeping valleys, rugged mountains, grand forests, and beautiful meadows are passed by in a constantly changing panorama.” Donehoo goes on to describe his trek across the Laurel Hills: “The journey over this great mountain ridge, of about twelve miles, is over rocks, fallen trees, and through heavy laurel underbrush, in a region as wild and as uninhabited as it was in frontier days.” Riders on horseback, using these Indians paths, would have found the going slow, the hilly terrain difficult to traverse. The narrowness of the paths and steepness of the defiles, and the need to forge creeks and streams made for a journey “….often interrupted by the narrowness and obstructions of our horse paths, as they were called, for we had no roads…and these difficulties were often increased by falling trees and tying grape vines across the way…” . The military campaigns of the French and Indian War were to further delineate the routes for later trade, commerce, and settlement, with the victorious English campaign defining the major east-west routes to Pittsburgh. The first full-scale British expedition, led by General Edward Braddock, set off from Cumberland Maryland in 1755.
Recommended publications
  • THE FORT PITT BLOCK HOUSE Prepared by Kelly Linn - January 2008
    THE FORT PITT BLOCK HOUSE Prepared by Kelly Linn - January 2008 The Block House is just one small defensive redoubt and the only surviving structure of Fort Pitt - a key British fortification during the French and Indian War in North America (or the Seven Years War as it is known in Europe). Constructed as the second largest British fort on the colonial frontier, Fort Pitt measured about 18 acres. Crown Point in New York was the largest covering 3.5 square miles. Both of these installations date to the same military era. Fort Pitt was constructed at the Forks of the Ohio (now the Point at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) between 1759 and 1761. It was a classic star-shaped fort with 5 bastions projecting from the corners. The Music Bastion and the Grenadiers Bastion were on the east, or land side, of the Point, the Flag and Monongahela Bastions fronted the Monongahela River and the Ohio Bastion overlooked the Allegheny River floodplain. Only the eastern walls were faced with brick to repel cannon fire; the remaining walls of the fort were earthen ramparts covered with sod. The walls of the fort averaged a height of 15 feet above the Monongahela terrace upon which it was constructed. In January 1762 - only a few months after the fort was completed - flood waters from the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers crested at nearly 40 feet inflicting heavy damage to the fort. Repairs were made, but in March 1763, another flood cresting at 41 feet, destroyed the Ohio Bastion entirely and heavily damaged the Monongahela Bastion a second time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Passage Through Time & the Mountains
    The GREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE is the longest multi-purpose rail-trail in the East, A Passage Through Time with t 00 continuous miles of trail open from near McKeesport to near Meyersdale, plus and the several smaller segments open in the Pittsburgh area. When finished, the Passage Mountains will offer a total of t 50 miles of non­ motorized, nearly level trail system between Cumberland, MD and the forks of the Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA. with a 52-mile spur to the Pittsburgh International Airport. At. Cumberland, it joins the C&..O Canal Towpath to expand the off-road trail linkage to Washington, D.C. Designated a National Recreation Trail, the Great Allegheny Passage enables hikers, bicyclists, cross­ country skiers and people with disabilities to discover the region's singular beauty in river gorges, mountain vistas and sweeping cityscapes. The Great Allegheny Passage is the registered mark of the Allegheny Trail Alliance, a coalition of seven trail organizations in Sovthwestem Pennsylvania and Western Maryland. www.atatrall.org 888-ATA-BIKE COVER: On May 2 t , t 975, the Chessie System ran this special train over the soon­ to-be-abandoned Western Maryland corridor from Connellsville to Hancock, MD to show the line to government and conservation officials and the press. This was the last passenger train to cross Salisbury Viaduct. The Viaduct was decked for trail use in 1999. The color photo was taken in May, 2002. Photos by Bill Metzger 50300 The Story of the GREAT ALLEGHENY 9 780964 601499 PASSAGE 2 HE GREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE is no mere tootpath through the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Presidential Speeches
    Post-Presidential Speeches • Fort Pitt Chapter, Association of the United States Army, May 31, 1961 General Hay, Members of the Fort Pitt Chapter, Association of the United States Army: On June 6, 1944, the United States undertook, on the beaches of Normandy, one of its greatest military adventures on its long history. Twenty-seven years before, another American Army had landed in France with the historic declaration, “Lafayette, we are here.” But on D-Day, unlike the situation in 1917, the armed forces of the United States came not to reinforce an existing Western front, but to establish one. D-Day was a team effort. No service, no single Allied nation could have done the job alone. But it was in the nature of things that the Army should establish the beachhead, from which the over-running of the enemy in Europe would begin. Success, and all that it meant to the rights of free people, depended on the men who advanced across the ground, and by their later advances, rolled back the might of Nazi tyranny. That Army of Liberation was made up of Americans and Britons and Frenchmen, of Hollanders, Belgians, Poles, Norwegians, Danes and Luxembourgers. The American Army, in turn, was composed of Regulars, National Guardsmen, Reservists and Selectees, all of them reflecting the vast panorama of American life. This Army was sustained in the field by the unparalleled industrial genius and might of a free economy, organized by men such as yourselves, joined together voluntarily for the common defense. Beyond the victory achieved by this combined effort lies the equally dramatic fact of achieving Western security by cooperative effort.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study
    The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM & BUSINESS PLAN July 2007 Prepared for The Ohio Rail Development Commission Indiana Department of Transportation Michigan Department of Transportation New York Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Prepared by: Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. In association with HNTB, Inc. The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail - Ohio Hub Study Technical Memorandum & Business Plan Table of Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................x Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 System Planning and Feasibility Goals and Objectives................................................... 1-3 1.2 Business Planning Objectives.......................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Study Approach and Methodology .................................................................................. 1-4 1.4 Railroad Infrastructure Analysis...................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Passenger
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHAMPTON COUNTY REPORTER Vol. 59 No. 85 8/17/2017 ESTATE and TRUST NOTICES Executors: Ilene J
    NORTHAMPTON COUNTY REPORTER Vol. 59 No. 85 8/17/2017 ESTATE AND TRUST NOTICES Executors: Ilene J. Baumann, 13 Notice is hereby given that, in the Lantern Pl. E., Easton, PA estates of the decedents set forth 18045-6129 and Peter S. below, the Register of Wills has Baumann, 36 Guinea Hollow granted letters testamentary or of Road, Lebanon, NJ 08833-4518 administration to the persons named. Attorneys: Peters, Moritz, Peischl, Notice is also hereby given of the Zulick, Landes & Brienza, LLP, existence of the trusts of the deceased 1 South Main Street, Nazareth, settlors set forth below for whom no PA 18064-2083 personal representatives have been appointed within 90 days of death. BEALER, JANIS M., dec’d. All persons having claims or demands Late of Hanover Township, against said estates or trusts are Northampton County, PA requested to make known the same, Executrix: Barbara J. Bealer c/o and all persons indebted to said Paul A. Florenz, Esquire, Kolb, estates or trusts are requested to Vasiliadis and Florenz, LLC, 60 make payment, without delay, to the West Broad Street, Ste. 303, executors or administrators or Bethlehem, PA 18018-5721 trustees or to their attorneys named Attorneys: Paul A. Florenz, below. Esquire, Kolb, Vasiliadis and FIRST PUBLICATION Florenz, LLC, 60 W. Broad St., ADAMS, CATRINA VASHON, Ste. 303, Bethlehem, PA 18018- dec’d. 5721 Late of the City of Bethlehem, BROWN, MATTHEW M., dec’d. Northampton County, PA Late of the Township of Bushkill, Administrators: Dorothy Green Northampton County, PA and Otis Green c/o Jennifer L. Administrator: Steven N.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania
    Pennsylvania ROUTE The Great American Rail-Trail route through Pennsylvania connects New York—from the shores of Lake Erie to the confluence of the several existing trails with one trail gap just west of Pittsburgh. Three Rivers in Pittsburgh and on to the Ohio River and Appalachian By connecting the trail through Pittsburgh, the Great American foothills. Rail-Trail also connects to the Industrial Heartland Trails Coalition (IHTC), a vision for a 1,500-mile network of trails that is part of RTC found and reviewed 22 plans in Pennsylvania to better RTC’s TrailNation™ portfolio. The IHTC network will stretch across understand the commonwealth’s trail priorities. A full list of these 51 counties in four states—Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and plans can be found in Appendix A. TABLE 6 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL STATISTICS IN PENNSYLVANIA Total Great American Rail-Trail Existing Trail Miles in Pa. (% of Total State Mileage) 161.3 (93.8%) Total Great American Rail-Trail Trail Gap Miles in Pa. (% of Total State Mileage) 10.6 (6.2%) Total Trail Gaps in Pa. 1 Total Great American Rail-Trail Miles in Pa. 171.9 TABLE 7 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE THROUGH PENNSYLVANIA Existing Trail or Trail Gap Name Length in Pa. Along Great American Rail-Trail (in Miles) Great Allegheny Passage 124.3 Three Rivers Heritage Trail 3.6 TRAIL GAP 1 – Pittsburgh to Coraopolis 10.6 Montour Trail 17.5 Panhandle Trail 15.9 Total Miles 171.9 Existing Trail Miles 161.3 Trail Gap Miles 10.6 railstotrails.org 23 24 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE ASSESSMENT MAP 3: PENNSYLVANIA greatamericanrailtrail.org GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE ASSESSMENT PENNSYLVANIA Great Allegheny Passage (gaptrail.org) in Pennsylvania GREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE The GAP enters Pennsylvania just north of Frostburg, Maryland, and it will continue to host the Great American Rail-Trail through Total Length (in Miles) 150.0 Pennsylvania for 124.3 miles through rolling hills and forestland Total Length Along Great to Pittsburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • 4200722264Mcp
    1992 EVALUATION AND UPDATE of the COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for ECONOMY BOROUGH Beaver County Pennsylvania PREPARED BY: !4. V. Kennedy municipal^ Planning Consultant Beaver Falls, PA IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE: Economy Borough Planning Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe INTRODUCTION 1 PART ONE - PLANNING BACKGROUND 3 Previous Programs 3 Planning Element Review 4 Natural Features 4 Economic Structure 6 Population Factors 9 Land Use Status 13 Community Facilities 16 Thoroughfares 23 Summary 28 PART TWO - DEVELOPMENT OUTLOOK 3 3 Goals and Objectives 31 Planning Influences 33 Regional Relationships 33 Local Considerations 35 Development Plan 38 Land Use Concepts 38 Highways 51 Public Services/Facilities 56 General S,ummary 60 -l i I -LIST OF PLATES PLATE ONE Existing Land Use Features Appendix A PLATE TWO Area Growth Patterns Page 34a PLATE THREE Development Concept Map Appendix B ii PLATE FOUR Highway Systems Appendix C PLATE FIVE Regional Highway Proposals Page 52a PLATE SIX Water Service Areas Appendix D PLATE SEVEN Sewer Service Areas Page 59a LIST OF TABLES Tables Paqe A Largest Employers - County 7 B Area Population Tr~nds 11 C Area Population Projections 12 D Land Classifications 40 INTRODUCTION Economy Borough was among the initial group of municipalities in Beaver County to officially act to control the growth pressures which were exerted following World War 11. The Borough's first formal Comprehensive Development Plan was prepared in 1962 in response to the impact of this postwar urbanization. As a result of this early planning, many of the problems normally associated with uncontrolled development were deflected by the communities in which planning programs were implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Other Schools
    TO: Pottstown Fans Due to the requests for directions to schools from parents and dedicated Pottstown fans, we have compiled this booklet from our direction file. Please take into consideration that the number of traffic lights and landmarks may have changed over the years, and we would appreciate if you would contact our office (484-941-9842) if directions are incorrect or not clear. You can also get directions to schools by using the athletic schedule feature on the school web page on the Activities link. Thank you. Pat Connors, Director of Co-Curricular Activities ABINGTON HIGH SCHOOL, Highland Avenue, Abington, PA Take PA Turnpike East to Willow Grove Exit No. 27 Get off turnpike and take Rt. 611 South (Easton Road & then Old York Road) Follow Rt. 611 South into Willow Grove (Rt. 611 will bear left past Burger King) * st Stay on Rt. 611 past Boston Market to 1 Street after overpass- Jerico Road -Turn right (Fitzpatrick Funeral Home) Follow Jerico Road directly into Abington Junior/Senior High School Campus Bear to right around high school - Field House (dome shape) is in the back of school. FOOTBALL STADIUM: Continue from * Stay on Route 611 (Old York Road) to Susquehanna Road. There is a First Union Bank on left corner. Make a left onto Susquehanna Road, then past Retirement Community Apartment to the next road – Huntingdon Road. Make a left onto Huntington Road and Memorial park (football stadium) will be on your right. Stadium is on the corner of Susquehanna & Huntingdon. (Approximate travel time – 50 minutes from Spring-Ford.) ACADEMY PARK HIGH SCHOOL, 300 Calcon Hook Road, Sharon Hill, PA 19079 Route 422 Bypass East to Route 202 North to Route 76 East (Schuylkill Expressway), to Route 476 South (Blue Route) to I- 95 North.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT October 31, 2020 FORT PITT CAPITAL TOTAL
    ANNUAL REPORT October 31 , 2020 FORT PITT CAPITAL TOTAL RETURN FUND c/o U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC P.O. Box 701 Milwaukee, WI 53201-0701 1-866-688-8775 Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of the Fund’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports from the Fund (defined herein) or from your financial intermediary, such as a broker-dealer or bank. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Fund or your financial intermediary electronically through the Fund’s website. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge. You can inform the Fund or your financial intermediary that you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held within the fund complex and may apply to all funds held through your financial intermediary. Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund Dear Fellow Shareholders, As of October 31, 2020, the net asset value (“NAV”) of the Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (the “Fund”) was $25.06 per share.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh, Pa), Photographs, 1892- 1981 (Bulk 1946-1965)
    Allegheny Conference On Community Development Page 1 Allegheny Conference On Community Development (Pittsburgh, Pa), Photographs, 1892- 1981 (bulk 1946-1965) Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania Archives MSP# 285 30 boxes (Boxes 1-22 Prints, Boxes 23-28 Negatives, Box 28 Transparencies, Boxes 29-30 Oversized Prints) Table of Content: Historical Note page 1 Scope and Content Note page 2 Series I: Prints page 2 Sub-series: Aviation page 3 Sub-series: Buildings page 3 Sub-series: Culture page 3 Sub-series: Education page 3 Sub-series: Golden Triangle page 4 Sub-series: Health & Welfare page 4 Sub-series: Highways page 4 Sub-series: Historical page 4 Sub-series: Housing page 4 Sub-series: Miscellaneous page 5 Sub-series: PA Pitt Partner’s Program page 5 Sub-series: Personnel page 5 Sub-series: Publications page 5 Sub-series: Recreation page 6 Sub-series: Research page 6 Sub-series: Smoke Control page 6 Sub-series: Stadiums page 6 Sub-series: Transportation page 6 Sub-series: Urban Redevelopment page 7 Series II: Negatives page 7 Sub-Series: Glass Plate Negatives page 7 Series III: Transparencies page 7 Series IV: Oversized Prints & Negatives page 7 Provenance page 8 Restrictions and Separations page 8 Catalog Entries page 8 Container List page 10 Series I: Prints page 10 Sub-series: Aviation page 10 Sub-series: Buildings page 10 Sub-series: Culture page 14 Allegheny Conference On Community Development Page 2 Sub-series: Education page 16 Sub-series: Golden Triangle page 20 Sub-series: Health & Welfare page 22 Sub-series: Highways page
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania Railroad, As Usual, Went out Oi Its Way to Be of Service to All of Our People
    SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 1957 Downloaded from http://PRR.Railfan.net Original document from the collection of Rob Schoenberg ©2010 - Commercial reproduction or distribution prohibited The New Freight Rates The Interstate Commerce Commission released its long-awaited final decision for increased freight rates (Ex Parte 206) on August 6, 1957. The higher rates went into effect on August 26. The maximum increase authorized over the rates in effect, not at the time of the decision but before December 28, 1956, is 14 percent within Eastern terri- tory. On traffic moving between the East and the West, the maximum increase is 12 percent; and between the East and the South, it is 9 percent (except for traffic moving on class rates, which was granted a 12 percent increase throughout the Nation). Agricultural commodi- ties like grain, livestock, meat, lard, vegetable oil, and shortening were given only a 9 percent increase in all territories. On coal and coke the increase was generally 15 cents per ton, but only 8 cents per ton on lake cargo coal destined to Lake Michigan and Lake Superior, 8 cents on Tidewater coal to New England, and 10 cents on export coal and coke. Several other commodities were limited to maximum increases ranging from only 2 cents per 100 pounds (40 cents per ton) on phosphate rock and salt, up to 12 cents per 100 pounds on edible nuts. Included in this category are potash, sugar, lumber, millwork, and fresh fruits and vegetables. In all, the increases authorized will average for the PRR about 10 percent above the rates in effect before December 28, 1956, and only about 4.5 percent above the rates in effect since December 28.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 9/98 Rev. HISTORIC CONTEXT for TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS
    9/98 rev. HISTORIC CONTEXT FOR TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS IN PENNSYLVANIA Introduction To assist with establishing the significance of the historical background of bridge building in Pennsylvania, it is important to identify and understand the historic contexts associated with the resources. Bridges do not stand in isolation, historically or physically; they embody events and trends that need to be considered when evaluating their individual or collective historical significance. Historic contexts organize historic properties in terms of theme, place, and time, and only within a historic context can what is significant “be determined in relationship to the historic development from which it emerged and in relationship to a group of similar associated properties” (National Register Bulletin 16, 1986: 6-7). In order to evaluate the National Register eligibility of the pre-1956 bridge population in Pennsylvania historic contexts have been researched and prepared twofold: one on the history of transportation networks in Pennsylvania, and the second on the application of bridge technology within the state. Both contexts address transportation issues from the earliest days of settlement to the 1950s, and both set the bridges within the national, state, and local contexts. The historic contexts will provide a means of evaluating each bridge’s technological significance, and its relationship to Pennsylvania’s transportation systems. Based on the historic contexts and their application to National Register criteria, each bridge in the inventory will be evaluated on its own merits with the contexts identifying the crucial distinctions of significance to pools of similar resources. 1. Overview Bridges are best understood as integral parts of transportation networks that carry people, vehicles, and materials over natural barriers such as rivers and streams, and over manmade barriers such as railroads, canals, and roads.
    [Show full text]