DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimal Design of Automotive Exhaust Thermoelectric Generator (AETEG)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optimal Design of Automotive Exhaust Thermoelectric Generator (AETEG) Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-2016 Optimal Design of Automotive Exhaust Thermoelectric Generator (AETEG) Hassan Fagehi Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons, and the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Fagehi, Hassan, "Optimal Design of Automotive Exhaust Thermoelectric Generator (AETEG)" (2016). Master's Theses. 764. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/764 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OPTIMAL DESIGN OF AUTOMOTIVE EXHAUST THERMOELECTRIC GENERATOR (AETEG) by Hassan Fagehi A thesis submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering (Mechanical) Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Western Michigan University December 2016 Thesis Committee: HoSung Lee, Ph.D., Chair Bade Shrestha, Ph.D. Chris Cho, Ph.D. OPTIMAL DESIGN OF AUTOMOTIVE EXHAUST THERMOELECTRIC GENERATOR (AETEG) Hassan Fagehi, M.S.E. Western Michigan University, 2016 A consumption of energy continues to increase at an exponential rate, especially in terms of automotive spark ignitions vehicles. About 40% of the applied fuel into a vehicle is lost as waste exhaust to the environment. The desire for improved fuel efficiency by recovering the exhaust waste heat in automobiles has become an important subject. The thermoelectric generator (TEG) has the potential to convert exhaust waste heat into electricity as long as it is improving fuel economy. The remarkable amount of research being conducted on TEGs indicates that this technology will have a bright future in terms of power generation. The current study discusses the optimal design of the automotive exhaust thermoelectric generator (AETEG). The work investigates the effect of leg length and ceramic plate materials on the performance of the thermoelectric module. A new design is conducted analytically based on the idea of leg length and the ceramic plate materials effect, giving a significant improvement in terms of power density. Experimental work is conducted to verify the model that used the ideal (standard) equations along with effective material properties. The model is reasonably verified by experimental work, which is mainly due to the utilization of the effective material properties. Hence, the thermoelectric module that was used in the experiment is optimized by using a newly developed optimal design theory (dimensionless analysis technique). © 2016 Hassan Fagehi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost, I would like to especially thank my advisor Prof. HoSung Lee for his encouragement and patience throughout my work. Without his support and guidance this work would not have been possible. I’m very lucky and thankful to have Dr. Lee as my advisor, who is always trying to improve his student’s knowledge. I would also like to extend my thanks to my committee members, Prof. Bade Shrestha and Prof. Chris Cho, for their guidance and suggestions to improve the quality of this work. I wish to thank the government of Saudi Arabia who believed in me and provided me with a generous scholarship. I would also like to thank my family, especially my mother, my wife, and my daughter for their support and patience. Their support is a big part of my accomplishment. Also, I thank all my friends and classmates for their support and helpful comments. Hassan Fagehi ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ ii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii NOMENCLATURE ......................................................................................................... xii 1 BACKGROUND OF THERMOELECTRIC .......................................................... 1 1.1 Thermoelectric Effects ......................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Seebeck Effect .............................................................................................. 2 1.1.2 Peltier Effect ................................................................................................. 3 1.1.3 Thomson Effect ............................................................................................. 3 1.1.4 The Figure of Merit ....................................................................................... 4 1.2 Thermoelectric Ideal (Standard) Equations.......................................................... 5 1.2.1 General Governing Equations ....................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Thermoelectric Couple Equations................................................................. 7 1.2.3 Thermoelectric Generators Equations ......................................................... 12 1.3 Contact Resistance for Thermoelectric Generator ............................................. 19 1.4 Thermoelectric Generator System ...................................................................... 23 1.4.1 Basic Equations of Thermoelectric Generator System ............................... 24 iii Table of Contents—Continued 1.4.2 Heat Sink Design and Optimization ........................................................... 25 1.4.3 Power Density ............................................................................................. 27 1.5 Chapter Conclusion ............................................................................................ 27 2 LITERATURE SURVEY AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CURRENT STUDY ... 29 2.1 Background ........................................................................................................ 29 2.1.1 Hot Side Heat Exchanger ............................................................................ 29 2.1.2 Coolant System ........................................................................................... 30 2.1.3 Bypass System ............................................................................................ 31 2.2 Literature Survey of Automotive Exhaust Thermoelectric Generator (AETEG) . ............................................................................................................................ 32 2.2.1 AETEG System ........................................................................................... 32 2.2.2 Numerical And Experimental Work of AETEG ......................................... 32 2.3 Motivation .......................................................................................................... 38 2.4 Objectives of Current Study ............................................................................... 39 3 MODELING OF (AETEG) .................................................................................. 40 3.1 Modeling of Module Tests ................................................................................. 40 3.2 Calculating the Effective Material Properties .................................................... 41 3.3 Dimensional Analysis Method ........................................................................... 43 iv Table of Contents—Continued 3.4 Heat Sink Optimization ...................................................................................... 47 3.5 Offset Strip-Fin Heat Exchanger (OSF) ............................................................. 49 3.6 Exhaust Mass Flow Rate Calculations ............................................................... 50 3.7 Pressure Drop Calculations ................................................................................ 51 3.8 Chapter Conclusion ............................................................................................ 52 4 EXPERIMENTAL WORK ...................................................................................... 53 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .............................................................................. 61 5.1 GM Project ......................................................................................................... 61 5.1.1 Module Test Validation .............................................................................. 61 5.1.2 AETEG Test Validation .............................................................................. 65 5.1.3 Optimizing and Improving GM System (New Design) .............................. 71 5.2 Applying the New Design of AETEG System for 400 Kw Engine ................... 84 5.2.1 Choosing of 400 Kw Diesel Engine ........................................................... 84 5.2.2 Exhaust Mass Flow Rate Calculation ......................................................... 85 5.2.3 Estimation of Power Output for 400 Kw Engine ....................................... 86 5.3 Experimental Results.......................................................................................... 87 5.3.1 Effective Material Properties Results ......................................................... 88 5.3.2 Experimental Results Comparing with Analytical Model .......................... 91 v Table of Contents—Continued
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bismuth Antimony Telluride
    ci al S ence Mahajan et al., J Material Sci Eng 2018, 7:4 ri s te & a E M n DOI: 10.4172/2169-0022.1000479 f g o i n l e a e n r r i n u g o Journal of Material Sciences & Engineering J ISSN: 2169-0022 Research Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Study and Characterization of Thermoelectric Material (TE) Bismuth Antimony Telluride Aniruddha Mahajan1*, Manik Deosarkar1 and Rajendra Panmand2 1Chemical Engineering Department, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, India 2Centre for Materials Electronics and Technology (C-MET), Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune, India Abstract Thermoelectric materials are used to convert the heat to electricity with no moving parts, in the present work an attempt has been made to prepare it for power generation function. Bismuth antimony telluride nanopowders were prepared by using mechanochemical method. Three different materials; Bismuth Telluride, (Bi0.75Sb0.25)2Te 3 and (Bi0.5Sb0.5)2Te 3 were synthesized. XRD and TEM analysis was carried out to confirm the results. The particle size of the material was determined by using FESEM analysis. The two alloys of Bismuth Telluride such prepared were converted in the pellet form using vacuum hydraulic pressure and their Seebeck coefficients were determined to test the material suitability for its use as a thermoelectric device. Their power factor measurement and Hall effect measurements were carried out at room temperature. Keywords: Bismuth telluride; Mechanochemical method; energy in one form into another. Use of TE solid materials Applications Nanoparticals; Seebeck coefficients in heat pump and refrigeration is well known [14] and it is now expanded such as cooled seats in luxury automobiles [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Seebeck and Peltier Effects V
    Seebeck and Peltier Effects Introduction Thermal energy is usually a byproduct of other forms of energy such as chemical energy, mechanical energy, and electrical energy. The process in which electrical energy is transformed into thermal energy is called Joule heating. This is what causes wires to heat up when current runs through them, and is the basis for electric stoves, toasters, etc. Electron diffusion e e T2 e e e e e e T2<T1 e e e e e e e e cold hot I - + V Figure 1: Electrons diffuse from the hot to cold side of the metal (Thompson EMF) or semiconductor leaving holes on the cold side. I. Seebeck Effect (1821) When two ends of a conductor are held at different temperatures electrons at the hot junction at higher thermal velocities diffuse to the cold junction. Seebeck discovered that making one end of a metal bar hotter or colder than the other produced an EMF between the two ends. He experimented with junctions (simple mechanical connections) made between different conducting materials. He found that if he created a temperature difference between two electrically connected junctions (e.g., heating one of the junctions and cooling the other) the wire connecting the two junctions would cause a compass needle to deflect. He thought that he had discovered a way to transform thermal energy into a magnetic field. Later it was shown that a the electron diffusion current produced the magnetic field in the circuit a changing emf V ( Lenz’s Law). The magnitude of the emf V produced between the two junctions depends on the material and on the temperature ΔT12 through the linear relationship defining the Seebeck coefficient S for the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Temperature Measurements
    Reference Temperatures We cannot build a temperature divider as we can a Metal A voltage divider, nor can we add temperatures as we + would add lengths to measure distance. We must rely eAB upon temperatures established by physical phenomena – which are easily observed and consistent in nature. The Metal B International Practical Temperature Scale (IPTS) is based on such phenomena. Revised in 1968, it eAB = SEEBECK VOLTAGE establishes eleven reference temperatures. Figure 3 eAB = Seebeck Voltage Since we have only these fixed temperatures to use All dissimilar metalFigures exhibit t3his effect. The most as a reference, we must use instruments to interpolate common combinations of two metals are listed in between them. But accurately interpolating between Appendix B of this application note, along with their these temperatures can require some fairly exotic important characteristics. For small changes in transducers, many of which are too complicated or temperature the Seebeck voltage is linearly proportional expensive to use in a practical situation. We shall limit to temperature: our discussion to the four most common temperature transducers: thermocouples, resistance-temperature ∆eAB = α∆T detector’s (RTD’s), thermistors, and integrated Where α, the Seebeck coefficient, is the constant of circuit sensors. proportionality. Measuring Thermocouple Voltage - We can’t measure the Seebeck voltage directly because we must IPTS-68 REFERENCE TEMPERATURES first connect a voltmeter to the thermocouple, and the 0 EQUILIBRIUM POINT K C voltmeter leads themselves create a new Triple Point of Hydrogen 13.81 -259.34 thermoelectric circuit. Liquid/Vapor Phase of Hydrogen 17.042 -256.108 at 25/76 Std.
    [Show full text]
  • Type T Thermocouple Copper-Constantan Temperature Vs Millivolt Table Degree C
    Technical Information Data Bulletin Type T Thermocouple Copper­Constantan T Extension Grade Temperature vs Millivolt Table Thermocouple Grade E + Copper Reference Junction 32°F + Copper M Temperature Range Maximum Thermocouple Grade Maximum Useful Temperature Range: Temperature Range P Thermocouple Grade: ­328 to 662°F –454 to 752°F ­ Consrantan ­200 to 350°C –270 to 400°C ­ Consrantan E Extension Grade: ­76 to 212°F Accuracy: Standard: 1.0°C or 0.75% ­60 to 100°C Special: 0.5°C or 0.4% R Recommended Applications: A Mild Oxidizing,Reducing Vacuum or Inert Environments. Good Where Moisture Is Present. Low Temperature Applications. T Temp0­1­2­3­4­5­6­7­8­9 U ­450 ­6.2544 ­6.2553 ­6.2562 ­6.2569 ­6.2575 ­440 ­6.2399 ­6.2417 ­6.2434 ­6.2451 ­6.2467 ­6.2482 ­6.2496 ­6.2509 ­6.2522 ­6.2533 R ­430 ­6.2174 ­6.2199 ­6.2225 ­6.2249 ­6.2273 ­6.2296 ­6.2318 ­6.2339 ­6.2360 ­6.2380 ­420 ­6.1873 ­6.1907 ­6.1939 ­6.1971 ­6.2002 ­6.2033 ­6.2062 ­6.2091 ­6.2119 ­6.2147 E ­410 ­6.1498 ­6.1539 ­6.1579 ­6.1619 ­6.1657 ­6.1695 ­6.1732 ­6.1769 ­6.1804 ­6.1839 ­400 ­6.1050 ­6.1098 ­6.1145 ­6.1192 ­6.1238 ­6.1283 ­6.1328 ­6.1372 ­6.1415 ­6.1457 ­390 ­6.0530 ­6.0585 ­6.0640 ­6.0693 ­6.0746 ­6.0799 ­6.0850 ­6.0901 ­6.0951 ­6.1001 & ­380 ­5.9945 ­6.0006 ­6.0067 ­6.0127 ­6.0187 ­6.0245 ­6.0304 ­6.0361 ­6.0418 ­6.0475 ­370 ­5.9299 ­5.9366 ­5.9433 ­5.9499 ­5.9564 ­5.9629 ­5.9694 ­5.9757 ­5.9820 ­5.9883 ­360 ­5.8598 ­5.8671 ­5.8743 ­5.8814 ­5.8885 ­5.8955 ­5.9025 ­5.9094 ­5.9163 ­5.9231 P ­350 ­5.7847 ­5.7924 ­5.8001 ­5.8077 ­5.8153 ­5.8228 ­5.8303 ­5.8378 ­5.8452
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Thermocouples and Thermocouple Assemblies
    Introduction to Thermocouples and Thermocouple Assemblies What is a thermocouple? relatively rugged, they are very often thermocouple junction is detached from A thermocouple is a sensor for used in industry. The following criteria the probe wall. Response time is measuring temperature. It consists of are used in selecting a thermocouple: slower than the grounded style, but the two dissimilar metals, joined together at • Temperature range ungrounded offers electrical isolation of one end, which produce a small unique • Chemical resistance of the 1 GΩ at 500 Vdc for diameters voltage at a given temperature. This thermocouple or sheath material ≥ 0.15 mm and 500 MΩ at 50 Vdc for voltage is measured and interpreted by • Abrasion and vibration resistance < 0.15 mm diameters. The a thermocouple thermometer. • Installation requirements (may thermocouple in the exposed junction need to be compatible with existing style protrudes out of the tip of the What are the different equipment; existing holes may sheath and is exposed to the thermocouple types? determine probe diameter). surrounding environment. This type Thermocouples are available in different offers the best response time, but is combinations of metals or ‘calibrations.’ How do I know which junction type limited in use to dry, noncorrosive and The four most common calibrations are to choose? (also see diagrams) nonpressurized applications. J, K, T and E. There are high temperature Sheathed thermocouple probes are calibrations R, S, C and GB. Each available with one of three junction What is ‘response time’? calibration has a different temperature types: grounded, ungrounded or A time constant has been defined range and environment, although the exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermocouple Standards Platinum / Platinum Rhodium
    Thermocouple Standards 0 to 1600°C Platinum / Platinum Rhodium Type R & S Standard Thermocouple, Model 1600, Premium grade wire, gas tight assembly, g Type R and Type S No intermediate junctions. g Gas Tight Assembly g Premium Grade Wire The Isothermal range of Thermocouple Standards are the result of many years development. The type R and S standards will cover the range from 0°C to 1600°C. The measuring assembly comprises a 7mm x 300mm or 600mm gas tight 99.7% recrystallized alumina sheath inside which is a 2.5mm diameter twin bore tube holding the thermocouple. The inner 2.5mm assembly is removable since some calibration laboratories will only accept fine bore tubed thermocouples and some applications require fine bore tubing. The covered noble metal thermocouple wire connects the Also available without the physical cold junction - Specify No Cold Junction (NCJ). measuring sheath to the reference sheath which is a 4.5mm x 250mm stainless steel sheath suitable for Model 1600 referencing in a 0°C reference system. Two thermo electrically free multistrand copper wires (teflon coated) Hot Sheath connect the thermocouple to the voltage measuring device. Temperature Range 0°C to 1600°C (R or S) Emf Vs Temperature According to relevant document The thermocouple material is continuous from the hot or measuring junction to the cold, or referencing junction. Response Time 5 minutes Hot Junction see diagram Calibration Dimensions The 1600 is supplied with a certificate giving the error Connecting Cable see diagram between the ideal value and the actual emf of the thermo- couple at the gold point.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermoelectric Properties of Sb-S System Compounds from DFT Calculations
    materials Article Thermoelectric Properties of Sb-S System Compounds from DFT Calculations Hailong Yang 1,2, Pascal Boulet 1,* and Marie-Christine Record 2 1 Campus St Jérôme, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, Madirel, 13013 Marseille, France; [email protected] 2 Campus St Jérôme, Aix-Marseille University, University of Toulon, CNRS, IM2NP, 13013 Marseille, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-4135-518-10 Received: 12 August 2020; Accepted: 19 October 2020; Published: 22 October 2020 Abstract: By combining density functional theory, quantum theory of atoms in molecules and transport properties calculations, we evaluated the thermoelectric properties of Sb-S system compounds and shed light on their relationships with electronic structures. The results show that, for Sb2S3, the large density of states (DOS) variation induces a large Seebeck coefficient. Taking into account the long-range weak bonds distribution, Sb2S3 should exhibit low lattice thermal conductivity. Therefore, Sb2S3 is promising for thermoelectric applications. The insertion of Be atoms into the Sb2S3 interstitial sites demonstrates the electrical properties and Seebeck coefficient anisotropy and sheds light on the understanding of the role of quasi-one-dimensional structure in the electron transport. The large interstitial sites existing in SbS2 are at the origin of phonons anharmonicity which counteracts the thermal transport. The introduction of Zn and Ga atoms into these interstitial sites could result in an enhancement of all the thermoelectric properties. Keywords: chalcogenides; thermoelectric; DFT;QTAIM; transport properties; structure-properties relationships 1. Introduction In a preceding paper [1], we performed a chemical bonding analysis on the ternary Cu-Sb-Se system compounds and showed that the weak interactions, either in local or whole structure, played an important role in lattice thermal conductivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation of Bismuth Telluride Specimens for TEM
    Preparation of Bismuth Telluride Specimens for TEM Mark Homer1, Douglas L. Medlin2 1,2. Sandia National Laboratories, Energy Nanomaterials Dept., Livermore CA, USA Bismuth telluride (Bi2Te3) and its alloys are an important class of thermoelectric material. How well a thermoelectric material works is dependent on a variety of factors such as electrical and thermal conductivity and the Seeback coefficient. Because the electrical and thermal conductivity can be affected by defects in the material, there is much interest in the basic understanding the microstructures of these materials [1]. There are challenges in preparation of TEM specimens from telluride-based materials due to their sensitivity to ion-milling artifacts. For instance, nanoscale defect arrangements have been shown to form in lead telluride (PbTe) specimens prepared under aggressive ion milling conditions if cooling and power density is not suitably controlled [2]. In this presentation we discuss methods and conditions for preparing TEM specimens of Bi2Te3 specimens considering both ion-milling and electropolishing techniques. In all cases TEM specimens were mechanically pre-thinned using conventional mechanical dimpling and polishing techniques prior to final thinning to electron transparency. The ion-milled specimens were prepared with Ar+ ion sputtering using a Fischione Model 1010 ion mill with LN cooling. The electropolished specimens were prepared using a Fischione Model 120 electropolisher and an electrolyte consisting of 53% water, 38% glycerol, 5% sodium hydroxide, and 4% tartaric acid. The electrolyte was set in an ice bath and cooled to 2° C, and electropolished at 25V and 35mA. Figures 1 and 2 show dark-field TEM micrographs comparing ion milled and electropolished Bi2Te3 specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Tunneling Behavior of Bismuth Telluride Nanoplates in Electrical
    Tunneling behavior of bismuth telluride nanoplates in electrical transport Mustafa Eginligil a, Weiqing Zhang b, Alan Kalitsov a, Xianmao Lu b,*, and Hyunsoo Yang a,* aDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117576 Singapore bDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117576 Singapore Abstract. We study the electrical transport properties of ensembles of bismuth telluride (Bi2Te3) nanoplates grown by solution based chemical synthesis. Devices consisting of Bi2Te3 nanoplates are fabricated by surface treatment after dropping the solution on the structured gold plates and the temperature dependence of resistance shows a nonmetallic behavior. Symmetric tunneling behavior in I-V was observed in both our experimental results and theoretical calculation of surface conductance based on a simple Hamiltonian, which excludes carrier-carrier interactions. Here, we present two devices: one showing symmetric, the other showing a two-step tunneling behavior. The latter can be understood in terms of disorder. * E-mail address: [email protected] (X. Lu), [email protected] (H. Yang) 1 1. Introduction Bismuth telluride (Bi2Te3), a semiconductor with an indirect bulk energy band gap of 0.165 eV [1], is a unique multifunctional material. It is an attractive thermoelectric material with the highest figure of merit (ZT = 0.68) at room temperature in its bulk [2]. It was recently shown that in thin films of Bi2Te3 ZT can be enhanced about ten times due to line dislocations in topologically protected perfectly conductive one dimensional state [3-5]. This physical property is under investigation, yet it is a well-known fact that Bi2Te3, like other members of its family (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Arsenene and Antimonene: Two-Dimensional Materials with High Thermoelectric Figures of Merit
    Arsenene and Antimonene: Two-Dimensional Materials with High Thermoelectric Figures of Merit Item Type Article Authors Sharma, S.; Sarath Kumar, S. R.; Schwingenschlögl, Udo Citation Sharma S, Kumar S, Schwingenschlögl U (2017) Arsenene and Antimonene: Two-Dimensional Materials with High Thermoelectric Figures of Merit. Physical Review Applied 8. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.8.044013. Eprint version Publisher's Version/PDF DOI 10.1103/physrevapplied.8.044013 Publisher American Physical Society (APS) Journal Physical Review Applied Rights Archived with thanks to Physical Review Applied Download date 27/09/2021 11:57:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10754/626090 PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED 8, 044013 (2017) Arsenene and Antimonene: Two-Dimensional Materials with High Thermoelectric Figures of Merit S. Sharma, S. Kumar, and U. Schwingenschlögl* Physical Science and Engineering Division (PSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia (Received 8 April 2017; revised manuscript received 22 June 2017; published 25 October 2017) We study the thermoelectric properties of As and Sb monolayers (arsenene and antimonene) using density-functional theory and the semiclassical Boltzmann transport approach. The materials show large band gaps combined with low lattice thermal conductivities. Specifically, the small phonon frequencies and group velocities of antimonene lead to an excellent thermoelectric response at room temperature. We show that n-type doping enhances the figure of merit. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.044013 I. INTRODUCTION to other two-dimensional materials, such as graphene and phosphorene. To cope with growing energy demands, alternative A series of studies has explored the electronic properties of approaches are required that can reduce the dependence arsenene and antimonene [23–32].
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Studies of the Thermoelectric Properties of Microstructured and Nanostructured Lead Salts
    Experimental Studies of the Thermoelectric Properties of Microstructured and Nanostructured Lead Salts by Kathleen C. Barron Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering A . in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of - - Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology APR 13 2005 February 2005 >'' 1ns Vv'thlbin Rnrrrn LIBRARIES All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce an to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signatureof Author ............. .............................................................. Department of Mechanical Engineering January 14, 2005 Certified by ......... .... Gang Chen Professor of Mechanical Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . ...................................................................................... Ernest Cravalho Undergraduate Officer 1. Experimental Studies in the Thermoelectric Properties of Microstructured and Nanostructured Lead Salts by Kathleen C. Barron Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering Abstract Thermoelectric devices allow for direct conversion between thermal and electrical energy. There applications, however, are severely limited by their inefficiency. A reduction in thermal conductivity of a material potentially enhances its overall thermoelectric performance
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Thermoelectric Generators: Progress and Applications
    energies Review A Review on Thermoelectric Generators: Progress and Applications Mohamed Amine Zoui 1,2 , Saïd Bentouba 2 , John G. Stocholm 3 and Mahmoud Bourouis 4,* 1 Laboratory of Energy, Environment and Information Systems (LEESI), University of Adrar, Adrar 01000, Algeria; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Sustainable Development and Computing (LDDI), University of Adrar, Adrar 01000, Algeria; [email protected] 3 Marvel Thermoelectrics, 11 rue Joachim du Bellay, 78540 Vernouillet, Île de France, France; [email protected] 4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Països Catalans No. 26, 43007 Tarragona, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 June 2020; Accepted: 7 July 2020; Published: 13 July 2020 Abstract: A thermoelectric effect is a physical phenomenon consisting of the direct conversion of heat into electrical energy (Seebeck effect) or inversely from electrical current into heat (Peltier effect) without moving mechanical parts. The low efficiency of thermoelectric devices has limited their applications to certain areas, such as refrigeration, heat recovery, power generation and renewable energy. However, for specific applications like space probes, laboratory equipment and medical applications, where cost and efficiency are not as important as availability, reliability and predictability, thermoelectricity offers noteworthy potential. The challenge of making thermoelectricity a future leader in waste heat recovery and renewable energy is intensified by the integration of nanotechnology. In this review, state-of-the-art thermoelectric generators, applications and recent progress are reported. Fundamental knowledge of the thermoelectric effect, basic laws, and parameters affecting the efficiency of conventional and new thermoelectric materials are discussed. The applications of thermoelectricity are grouped into three main domains.
    [Show full text]