Minneapolis-St. Paul Summer Olympic Venue Strategy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
EQB Monitor Procedures in Limited Specific Circumstances; This Primarily Would Affect the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Process at Part 4410.3610
February 13, 2006 Comments sought on amendments to Environmental Review program rules The Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) intends to adopt amendments to 39 subparts of the Environmental Review program rules. Written comments will be received by the EQB through 4:30 p.m. on March 15, 2006. Comments should identify the portion of the proposed rules addressed, the reason for the comment, and any change proposed. If at least 25 persons request a hearing by 4:30 p.m. on March 15, 2006, the EQB will hold a public hearing in the Fort Snelling History Center Auditorium, Fort Snelling, Minnesota (at the junction of State Highways 5 & 55) on Thursday, March 30, 2006, one session starting at 2:00 p.m. and a second session starting at 7:00 p.m. A copy of the proposed rule amendments and the official notice of rulemaking are published in the February 13, 2006 State Register and are also available at the EQB’s website, www.eqb.state.mn.us. The Statement of Need and Reasonableness (SONAR) is also available at this web site and at the EQB offices and at the Office of Administrative Hearings. This document includes a summary of the justification for the proposed rules, a description of who will be affected by the proposed rules and an estimate of the probable cost of the proposed rules. Most of the proposed amendments are minor “housekeeping” or technical amendments that are intended to clarify points of ambiguity or confusion in the existing rules or to correct minor flaws in the environmental review procedures. -
Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic
5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio Page 47 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio and Transport Strategic Plan Page 48 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio and Transport Strategic Plan Page 49 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Summary of Transport Aspect of Olympic Cities Main Olympic Area 89 ㎢ 128 ㎢ 159 ㎢ 155 ㎢ 511 ㎢ Population 4.6 Million 3 Million 7.5 Million 8.2 Million 6.3 Million Main Transit for Rail/Metro Metro/Tram Rail/Metro Metro - 4 BRT Olympic Transport Bus Bus Bus improvement- Metro –line4- Bus Rail-new vehicle Dedicated Lane Some 3 Routes 34 Routes 240km More than 150km Buses 285.7km ITS -Traffic Control -Traffic Control -Traffic Control -Traffic Control -Traffic Control Center, Field Center, Field Center, Field Center, Field Center, Field Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and systems systems systems systems systems -R$65million -Co-Operation -Co-Operation -Co-Operation -Co-Operation -Co-Operation with Security, with Security, with Security, with Security, with Security Transit and Transit and Transit and Transit and Transit and Olympic Stadium Olympic Stadium Olympic Stadium Olympic Stadium Olympic Management Management Management Management Stadium Management Progress? Page 50 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Issues and Key -Size of Olympic Area Rio 2016 has Largest and Widest Main Olympic Area ⇒Minimizing Travel Time with Traffic/Transportation/Transit Mgmt -Core of Venues It will generate traffic of Spectators and Athletes Participants ⇒How to assure the linkage of each Venue and Accommodation -Main Transit Main Transit for Spectators is BRTs connecting with Metro and Rail in Other Cities; Metro or Tram or Rail ⇒ Secure Smooth Traffic On the Road ⇒ Ensure Connection of Different Mode ⇒ Traffic/Transport/Transit Operators Cooperation is most important Page 51 5. -
The Olympic Movement
OLYMPIC LEGACY 2013 “Creating sustainable legacies 1WHAT IS OLYMPIC LEGACY? 5 is a fundamental commitment SPORTING LEGACY 13 2 of the Olympic Movement. 1 3SOCIAL LEGACIES 23 Every city that hosts the 4ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACIES 33 Olympic Games becomes a temporary steward of the 5URBAN LEGACIES 45 Olympic Movement. It is a great 6ECONOMIC LEGACIES 55 responsibility. It is also a great 7CONCLUSION 65 opportunity. Host cities capture worldwide attention. Each has a once-in-a-lifetime chance to showcase the celebration of the human spirit. And each creates a unique set of environmental, social and economic legacies that can change a community, a region, and a nation forever.” Jacques Rogge, IOC President International Olympic Committee Château de Vidy – C.P. 356 – CH-1007 Lausanne / Switzerland Tel. +41 21 621 61 11 – Fax +41 21 621 62 16 www.olympic.org Published by the International Olympic Committee – March 2013 All rights reserved Printing by Didwedo S.à.r.l., Lausanne, Switzerland Printed in Switzerland 2 3 4 WHAT IS OLYMPIC LEGACY? 1 A LASTING LEGACY The Olympic Games have the power to deliver lasting benefits which 6 can considerably change a community, its image and its infrastructure. 7 As one of the world’s largest sporting events, the Games can be a tremendous catalyst for change in a host city with the potential to create far more than just good memories once the final medals have been awarded. Each edition of the Olympic Games also provides significant legacies for the Olympic Movement as a whole, helping to spread the Olympic values around the world. -
The University of Minnesota Twin Cities Combined Heat and Power Project
001 p-bp15-01-02a 002 003 004 005 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY RMAD and Industrial Divisions Environment & Energy Section; Air Quality Permits Section The University of Minnesota Twin Cities Combined Heat and Power Project (1) Request for Approval of Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order and Authorization to Issue a Negative Declaration on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement; and (2) Request for Approval of Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law, and Order, and Authorization to Issue Permit No. 05301050 -007. January 27, 2015 ISSUE STATEMENT This Board Item involves two related, but separate, Citizens’ Board (Board) decisions: (1) Whether to approve a Negative Declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed University of Minnesota Twin Cities Campus Combined Heat and Power Project (Project). (2) If the Board approves a Negative Declaration on the need for an EIS, decide whether to authorize the issuance of an air permit for the Project. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff requests that the Board approve a Negative Declaration on the need for an EIS for the Project and approve the Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law, and Order supporting the Negative Declaration. MPCA staff also requests that the Board approve the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order authorizing the issuance of Air Emissions Permit No. 05301050-007. Project Description. The University of Minnesota (University) proposes to construct a 22.8 megawatt (MW) combustion turbine generator with a 210 million British thermal units (MMBTU)/hr duct burner to produce steam for the Twin Cities campus. -
7-12 BOR Docket Sheet
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:15 - 2:45 p.m. 600 McNamara Alumni Center, Boardroom Board Members Linda Cohen, Chair David Larson, Vice Chair Clyde Allen Richard Beeson Laura Brod Thomas Devine John Frobenius Venora Hung Dean Johnson David McMillan Maureen Ramirez Patricia Simmons AGENDA 1. Introductions - E. Kaler (pp. 3-7) A. Chancellor, University of Minnesota Crookston B. Athletic Director, Twin Cities Campus C. Faculty Consultative Committee Chair D. Academic Professionals & Administrators Consultative Committee Chair E. Civil Service Consultative Committee Chair 2. Approval of Minutes - Action - L. Cohen 3. Report of the President - E. Kaler 4. Report of the Chair - L. Cohen 5. Election of Secretary & Appointment of Executive Director - Review/Action - L. Cohen (pp. 8-16) 6. Receive and File Reports (pp. 17-19) A. Board of Regents Policy Report 7. Consent Report - Review/Action - L. Cohen (pp. 20-34) A. Gifts B. Educational Planning & Policy Committee Consent Report 8. Board of Regents Policy: Institutional Conflict of Interest - Action - M. Rotenberg/A. Phenix (pp. 35-38) 9. Board of Regents Policy: Employee Compensation and Recognition - Review/Action - K. Brown/ A. Phenix (pp. 39-42) 10. Board of Regents Policy: Employee Development, Education, and Training - Review/Action - K. Brown/A. Phenix (pp. 43-46) 11. Resolution Related to: Alcoholic Beverage Sales at TCF Bank Stadium, Mariucci Arena, and Williams Arena - Review/Action - A. Phenix/W. Donohue (pp. 47-50) 12. Itasca Project Higher Education Task Force - Partnerships for Prosperity - E. Kaler/G. Page (pp. 51-52) 13. Report of the Faculty, Staff & Student Affairs Committee - P. -
The Beijing National Stadium
THE BEIJING NATIONAL STADIUM THERE ARE MANY REASONS TO REMEMBER THE 2008 Area: 254,600 square meters OLYMPIC GAMES, AND ONE OF THESE IS UNDOUBTEDLY THE Track Provider: Mondo Spa IMPRESSIVE EVENTS BROADCASTED TO AUDIENCES Height: 69,2 meters AROUND THE WORLD FROM THE OLYMPIC STADIUM IN Start date of construction: December 24, 2003 BEIJING, A BUILDING UNIVERSALLY DUBBED WITH THE Cost of project: $423 million NICKNAME "THE BIRD'S NEST". Structural engineering: Arup Number of workers: 17,000 Steel used: 44,000 tons Capacity: 80,000/91,000 (2008 Olympic games) Olympic Editions (China) AN ARCHITECTURAL MIRACLE The reason for the name immediately strikes the eye : an intricate system of ties and a complex steel structure makes the building look like a huge nest, that can hold up to 91,000 spectators and has one of the world's fastest athletic tracks. The history of this architectural miracle began with an annoucement issued on December 19, 2002. On March 26, 2003 a team of international experts examined the proposals coming from all over the world. In April, the winner was announced: the swiss Herzog & De Meuron firm, which along with Arup Sport and the China Architecture Design & Research Group would deliver the full project in December 2007. Everything was perfect, up to the last details. On June 28, 2008 a grand opening ceremony drew the curtain on this colossal stage that would for about a month put the Chinese dragon under the worlds’ astonished eyes. THE MYTH Creating a building of this magnitude was not an easy task. In China everything is a symbol and a reference to the past and the National Stadium in Beijing was no different. -
Survey Responses
E Line Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Study: Kick-Off Phase Survey Responses Responses Collected from: November 12, 2018 – January 12, 2019 Each individual survey response has a unique number associated with it to track comments throughout the document. There were 451 unique responses. All comments are presented verbatim from how they were submitted. No grammatical, word choice changes or spelling has been corrected. Any contact information if provided has been redacted. Contents North Preferred Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 3 Why do you prefer that option? ........................................................................................................... 3 South Preferred Alternative .................................................................................................................... 26 Why do you prefer that option? ......................................................................................................... 26 Are you a current Route 6 rider? ............................................................................................................ 49 Where do you typically board to start your trip on Route 6? ................................................................. 49 How often do you ride Route 6? ............................................................................................................. 60 Do you use other Metro Transit Routes? .............................................................................................. -
DIRECTIONS and PARKING the Mcnamara Alumni Center, 200 Oak St. SE, Is Located on the East Bank of the University of Minnesota C
DIRECTIONS AND PARKING The McNamara Alumni Center, 200 Oak St. SE, is located on the East Bank of the University of Minnesota campus across from Williams Arena and TCF Bank Stadium. Directions to the adjacent University Ave Ramp 1926 University Ave. SE, Mpls. 55455 This adjacent 500-car ramp is connected by tunnel to the Alumni Center. The ramp entrance is on University Ave. Parking is $3.00 per hour with a daily maximum of $12.00. Evening events at the Alumni Center may qualify for event rates of $8.00-$10.00 per car. Once inside the parking ramp, take the East elevator to tunnel B or street level. The Alumni Center is the copper building adjacent to the ramp. From the north, heading south on 35W 1. Take Exit #18, 4th St-University Ave exit 2. Cross 4th Street SE; turn left on University Ave 3. Stay in the right lane, drive 9 blocks to the University Ave Parking Ramp - located on the right side of the street From the south, heading north on 35W 1. Take Exit #18, 4th St-University Ave exit 2. Turn right on University Ave 3. Stay in the right lane, drive 9 blocks to the University Ave Parking Ramp - located on the right side of the street From the east or west on I-94 1. Take Exit #235B, University of Minnesota/Huron Boulevard 2. Follow Huron Boulevard one block and turn left onto Fulton St (1st stop light) 3. Drive 3 blocks and turn right onto Oak St 4. Follow Oak St past the Alumni Center (on the left) and cross over University Ave 5. -
Golden Gopher Baseball Team Ranked 26Th in Baseball America's Preseason National Poll
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Bierman Field Athletic Building 516 15th Avenue Southeast Minneapolis, MN 55455 (612) 625-4090 Fax 625-0359 For Immediate Release January 22, 1998 GOLDEN GOPHER BASEBALL TEAM RANKED 26TH IN BASEBALL AMERICA'S PRESEASON NATIONAL POLL The University of Minnesota baseball team is ranked 26th in Baseball America's preseason national rankings. The Golden Gophers are the highest-rated Big Ten team, ahead of Illinois (36th) and Ohio State (43rd). Baseball America also selected senior Robb Quinlan as its preseason Big Ten player of the year and junior left-hander Ben Birk as its preseason Big Ten pitcher of the year. Quinlan set single-season school records with 24 home runs, 97 hits, 87 runs scored and 188 total bases in 1998 en route to earning first-team All-Big Ten and second-team All-America honors. The Maplewood, Minn., native is already the school's career leader in total bases and is poised to set new school records in hits, home runs, runs scored, at-bats and slugging percentage. Birk, also cited as the publication's top major league prospect in the conference, finished 8-2 with a 2.65 ERA as he earned third-team All-Big Ten honors. After missing the first month of the Big Ten season with a shoulder injury, the St. Paul, Minn., native came back to post a 4-0 league record with a 0.34 ERA The Golden Gophers return 15 of 18 letterwinners from a team that finished 45-15 with a Big Ten Tournament championship and a bid to the NCAA Baseball Tournament. -
Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Outdoor Events and Locations
QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK OUTDOOR EVENTS AND LOCATIONS NO ORDINARY PARK Your guide to outdoor event spaces and locations for concerts, festivals, sports, challenges, filming, photography, community events and more. THE GREAT OUTDOORS Grab your chance to make use of London’s most spectacular new public space by making the Park your next event venue. The Park is a sensational destination for organisers and audiences of events of all types and scales. Since opening PAST PROMOTERS INCLUDE the north of the Park in 2013 and the south of the Park in LiveNation, AEG, Jeep, Vodafone, Mind, BBC, 2014, we’ve hosted music festivals, concerts, sporting BT, Commonwealth Games, London Borough events, charity challenges, corporate away days, of Newham, Transport for London, Barbican community celebrations, markets and more. Centre, Guide Dogs for the Blind, Nova, Limelight and more. With its excellent transport connections and prime location in the heart of a vibrant and growing community, the Park is an easily accessible space in a thriving part of east London. The Park boasts a selection of spectacular outdoor licensed locations and a stunning backdrop of iconic venues and London landmarks. PAST EVENTS INCLUDE Invictus Games, Sport Relief Games, Tour de France, Prudential RideLondon, Wireless Festival, Dogs Unite, The Color Run, Hard Rock Calling, Queen’s Baton Relay, Great British Carnival, Vintage Classic Car Boot Sale, LolliBop, Open East Festival, National Paralympic Day and Mayor’s Liberty Festival, Summer Stampede Festival, Picnic in the Park, Art on the Move, and more. The north of the Park: green fields and open spaces A wide open green space on the banks of the River Lea is home to our two northern event lawns, framed by the Copper Box Arena, Here East, and Lee Valley VeloPark. -
INSTITUTION 74T- The,Original Document. Reproductions V
1. DOCUMENT RESUME ED 123 953 HE 007 470 TITLE All-University Faculty .Tnformation Bulletin, Fall 1974 and Twin-Cities Campus FacultyInformati-on Bulletin Supplement, Fall 1975. INSTITUTION minnesota Univ., Minneapolis.' PVB WiTE 74T- NOTE 118p. EDR$ PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$6.01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academic Freedom; *AdmiltiOzative Policy; Administrator 'Responsibility,Ancillary Services; *dellege'Faculty; Faculty Organizations; Fringe Benefits; Gov &nance; *Higher Education; Housing; *Personnel Policy; Research; *State Universities; Teacher Responsibility IDENTIFIERS *Faculty Handbooks; University of Minnesota ^I+ ABSTRACT , The All University Faculty Information Bulletin for 1974 for the university of Minnesota describes the university; its organization and administration; the duties and privileges of the fdculty; faculty personnel,information; teaching policies andl procedures; student services; university resources including research and study facilities, publicatio-is, And support facilities and staff; and the university administration and organization. The suppled fit provides similar information more specifically concerning the Tw n 'Cities Campus. '(JMF) *****vc**************************************************************** * Documenis acquired by ERIC include many inforMai unpublished -* *. materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes eVeryeffort.* * to obtain the best copy available: Nevertheless, items of marginal * 1* reproducibility are often pncoUtte'red and this affec he quality * * of,the microfiche'and hardeopy\reproductions ERICmatravailable * ' * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (BDRSi. EDRS is not- , * responsible for the quality ofthe,original document. Reproductions V * supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original. * *********************************************************************** - \ ,,,,:f,,.,o' 4,44!n.,r,, ',,.,.11' '$,,,f ,,-- tr.., t ,i,' *1;4 : . A I 1-pniversity1 FACULTY INFORMATION BULLETIN Fall 1974 - (# 41, '07 !,1!i oil.,. ' 11. .4 I . -
University of Minnesota–Twin Cities 202 Morrill Hall 100 Church Street S.E
REGION V UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS ILLINOIS INDIANA IOWA 500 WEST MADISON ST., SUITE 1475 MINNESOTA CHICAGO, IL 60661-4544 NORTH DAKOTA WISCONSIN SeptemberCHICAGO, IL 27 60661, 201-45448 Dr. Eric Kaler President University of Minnesota–Twin Cities 202 Morrill Hall 100 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN 55455 RE: OCR # 05-15-2038 University of Minnesota – Twin Cities Dear Dr. Kaler: This is to advise you of the resolution of the above-referenced complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Education (Department), Office for Civil Rights (OCR), against the University of Minnesota Twin- Cities (University) alleging discrimination on the basis of sex. The complaint alleged that the University discriminates against women in the following areas of its athletic program: 1. Accommodation of women’s athletic interests and abilities, 2. Distribution of athletic financial aid, 3. Provision of equipment and supplies, 4. Scheduling of competitions and practices, 5. Provision of locker rooms, practice and competitive facilities, 6. Provision of medical and training facilities, 7. Provision of support services, and 8. Distribution of recruiting resources. OCR investigated this complaint under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 – 1688, and its implementing regulation at 34 C.F.R. Part 106, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in programs and activities receiving financial assistance from the Department. The University is a recipient of financial assistance from the