IPBES Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IPBES Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics IPBES workshop on biodiversity and pandemic report FC.pdf 1 11/11/2563 BE 10:45 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Suggested citation Photo credits IPBES (2020) Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Cover: Shutterstock/Rich Carey (above), Pandemics of the Intergovernmental Platform on Shutterstock/Li Wa (below left) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Daszak, P., Amuasi, Shutterstock/didesign021 (below center) J., das Neves, C. G., Hayman, D., Kuiken, T., Roche, B., Shutterstock/Production Perig (below right) Zambrana-Torrelio, C., Buss, P., Dundarova, H., Feferholtz, P. D-E: Shutterstock/Richard Whitcombe Y., Földvári, G., Igbinosa, E., Junglen, S., Liu, Q., Suzan, P. F: Earth Tree/Paul Hilton G., Uhart, M., Wannous, C., Woolaston, K., Mosig Reidl, P., P. H: pexels/Ivars (above), O’Brien, K., Pascual, U., Stoett, P., Li, H., Ngo, H. T., IPBES iStock/ClarkandCompany (below) secretariat, Bonn, Germany, DOI:10.5281/zenodo.4147317. P. 7: pexels/Pok Rie P. 10: iStock/DuxX Reproduction P. 17: Christopher Michel This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part P. 22: Shutterstock/Anna Moskvina and in any form for educational or non-profit services P. 32: Getty Images/NurPhoto/Vishal Bhatnagar without special permission from the copyright holder, P. 33: rawpixel/Centers for Disease Control provided acknowledgement of the source is made. and Prevention The IPBES secretariat would appreciate receiving a P. 38: iStock/Radoslaw Kozik copy of any publication that uses this publication as a P. 45: iStock/Vrouwenhof21nl source. No use of this publication may be made for resale P. 48: iStock/[email protected] or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the IPBES secretariat. P. 52: Shutterstock/wintelineproductions.com Applications for such permission, with a statement of P. 98: iStock/JM Image Factory (above), the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be iStock/Jenson (below) addressed to the IPBES secretariat. The use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products for publicity or advertising is not permitted. The report of the IPBES workshop on biodiversity and pandemics was made possible thanks to a contribution from the Federal Ministry for the Environment, For further information, please contact: Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety of Germany. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) IPBES Secretariat, UN Campus Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1, D-53113 Bonn, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 228 815 0570 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ipbes.net DISCLAIMER The IPBES Bureau and Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP) authorized a workshop on biodiversity and pandemics that was held virtually on 27-31 July 2020 in accordance with the provisions on “Platform workshops” in support of Plenary-approved activities, set out in section 6.1 of the procedures for the preparation of Platform deliverables (IPBES-3/3, annex I). This workshop report and any recommendations or conclusions contained therein have not been reviewed, endorsed or approved by the IPBES Plenary. The workshop report is considered supporting material available to authors in the preparation of ongoing or future IPBES assessments. While undergoing a scientific peer-review, this material has not been subjected to formal IPBES review processes. IPBES WORKSHOP ON BIODIVERSITY AND PANDEMICS WORKSHOP REPORT CONTENTS Preamble 1 Executive Summary 2 Introduction 8 Sections 1: The relationship between people and biodiversity underpins disease 11 emergence and provides opportunities for pandemic prevention, control and response measures 2: Land use and climate change as drivers of pandemic risk and biodiversity loss 18 3: The wildlife trade, biodiversity and pandemics 23 4: Controlling pandemics relies on, and affects, biodiversity 33 5: Policy options to foster transformative change towards preventing pandemics 41 Appendix 53 References 54 Annex I: Scientific Steering Committee 80 II: List of participants 81 III: Workshop agenda 84 IV: Glossary 85 PREAMBLE The IPBES Bureau and Multidisciplinary Expert Panel, pandemics; 4) learning from nature to better control in the context of the extraordinary situation caused by pandemics; and 5) preventing pandemics based on the COVID-19 pandemic, and considering the role that a “One Health” approach. IPBES can play in strengthening the knowledge base on biodiversity, decided that IPBES would organize a The workshop participants selected by the IPBES “Platform workshop” on biodiversity and pandemics, in Multidisciplinary Expert Panel included 17 experts accordance with the procedures for the preparation of nominated by Governments and organizations following a IPBES deliverables, in particular decision IPBES-3/3, call for nominations and 5 experts from the ongoing IPBES annex I, section 6.1. on the organization of assessment of the sustainable use of wild species, the Platform workshops. assessment on values and the assessment of invasive alien species, as well as experts assisting with the scoping of This workshop, held virtually on 27-31 July 2020, provided the IPBES nexus assessment and transformative change an opportunity to review the scientific evidence on the assessments. In addition, resource persons from the origin, emergence and impact of COVID-19 and other Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the pandemics, as well as on options for controlling and Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), preventing pandemics, with the goal to provide immediate the Secretariat of the Convention on International Trade information, as well as enhance the information IPBES can in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), provide to its users and stakeholders in its ongoing and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification future assessments. (UNCCD) and the World Health Organization (WHO) attended the workshop. This workshop report supports IPBES Plenary-approved activities, and is considered supporting material to This workshop report has been prepared by all workshop authors in the preparation of ongoing or future IPBES participants and been subjected to several rounds of assessments, and, in particular, in the preparation of the internal review and revisions and one external peer scoping report for a future thematic assessment of the review process. interlinkages among biodiversity, water, food and health (decision IPBES-7/1, II). Technical support to the workshop has been provided by the IPBES secretariat. The workshop brought together 22 experts from all regions of the world, to discuss 1) how pandemics IPBES thanks the Government of Germany for the provision emerge from the microbial diversity found in nature; of financial support for the organization of the workshop and 2) the role of land-use change and climate change in production of the report. driving pandemics; 3) the role of wildlife trade in driving WORKSHOP REPORT 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pandemics represent an existential threat to the health also drastically affect developed countries that depend and welfare of people across our planet. The scientific on globalized economies, as COVID-19’s impact on the evidence reviewed in this report demonstrates that United States of America and many European countries is pandemics are becoming more frequent, driven by currently demonstrating. a continued rise in the underlying emerging disease events that spark them. Without preventative strategies, Pandemics emerge from the microbial pandemics will emerge more often, spread more rapidly, diversity found in nature kill more people, and affect the global economy with • The majority (70%) of emerging diseases (e.g. more devastating impact than ever before. Current Ebola, Zika, Nipah encephalitis), and almost all pandemic strategies rely on responding to diseases known pandemics (e.g. influenza, HIV/AIDS, after their emergence with public health measures and COVID-19), are zoonoses – i.e. are caused by technological solutions, in particular the rapid design microbes of animal origin. These microbes and distribution of new vaccines and therapeutics. ‘spill over’ due to contact among wildlife, However, COVID-19 demonstrates that this is a slow livestock, and people. and uncertain path, and as the global population waits An estimated 1.7 million currently undiscovered for vaccines to become available, the human costs are • viruses are thought to exist in mammal and avian mounting, in lives lost, sickness endured, economic hosts. Of these, 631,000–827,000 could have the collapse, and lost livelihoods. ability to infect humans. Pandemics have their origins in diverse microbes carried • The most important reservoirs of pathogens with by animal reservoirs, but their emergence is entirely pandemic potential are mammals (in particular driven by human activities. The underlying causes of bats, rodents, primates) and some birds pandemics are the same global environmental changes (in particular water birds), as well as livestock that drive biodiversity loss and climate change. These (e.g. pigs, camels, poultry). include land-use change, agricultural expansion and intensification, and wildlife trade and consumption. Human ecological disruption and These drivers of change bring wildlife, livestock, and unsustainable consumption drive people into closer contact, allowing animal microbes pandemic risk to move into people and lead to infections, sometimes • The risk of pandemics is increasing rapidly, with outbreaks, and more rarely into true pandemics that
Recommended publications
  • Preventing the Next Zoonotic Pandemic Strengthening and Extending the One Health Approach to Avert Pandemics of Animal Origin in the Region © FAO/Eran RaiMan
    FAO COVID-19 Response and Recovery Programme: Europe and Central Asia Preventing the next zoonotic pandemic Strengthening and extending the One Health approach to avert pandemics of animal origin in the region © FAO/Eran Raiman The issue Budget : USD 2 million SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, probably originated from an animal source, similar to 60 percent of all human infectious diseases. The Time frame: 2020–2024 pandemic has emphasized the need to prepare for, prevent, detect and respond to diseases at primary spillover level, where a new pandemic is SDGs likely to start. Pathogens are most likely to spread in locations where wildlife comes into contact with livestock production, particularly where people earn livelihoods, such as in live animal markets, areas where bushmeat is hunted, traded and consumed, or where growing pressures on natural ecosystems has forced livestock, wildlife and humans into close proximity. As a result, family farmers, especially women and children, are at high risk. Preventing spillover at source and mitigating the emergence and spread of pandemics requires a holistic and participatory One Health approach, involving experts, policymakers and communities in high-risk settings. Related FAO policy briefs The zoonotic nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was established long before One Health legislation. Contributing to COVID-19 had evolved into a pandemic. Investigations into potential pandemic prevention through law animal hosts for this and other coronaviruses are pivotal to improve our understanding of COVID-19’s epidemiology, as well as to identify (and Integrated agriculture water minimize) sources for human infection. COVID-19 infection in animals sharing management and health the same space as humans comes as no surprise, given the prevalence of environmental contamination in households with the causative virus.
    [Show full text]
  • IPBES Workshop on Biodiversity and Pandemics Report
    IPBES Workshop on Biodiversity and Pandemics WORKSHOP REPORT *** Strictly Confidential and Embargoed until 3 p.m. CET on 29 October 2020 *** Please note: This workshop report is provided to you on condition of strictest confidentiality. It must not be shared, cited, referenced, summarized, published or commented on, in whole or in part, until the embargo is lifted at 3 p.m. CET/2 p.m. GMT/10 a.m. EDT on Thursday, 29 October 2020 This workshop report is released in a non-laid out format. It will undergo minor editing before being released in a laid-out format. Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services 1 The IPBES Bureau and Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP) authorized a workshop on biodiversity and pandemics that was held virtually on 27-31 July 2020 in accordance with the provisions on “Platform workshops” in support of Plenary- approved activities, set out in section 6.1 of the procedures for the preparation of Platform deliverables (IPBES-3/3, annex I). This workshop report and any recommendations or conclusions contained therein have not been reviewed, endorsed or approved by the IPBES Plenary. The workshop report is considered supporting material available to authors in the preparation of ongoing or future IPBES assessments. While undergoing a scientific peer-review, this material has not been subjected to formal IPBES review processes. 2 Contents 4 Preamble 5 Executive Summary 12 Sections 1 to 5 14 Section 1: The relationship between people and biodiversity underpins disease emergence and provides opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Environment Technologies for Space and Terrestrial Applications
    Extreme Environment Technologies for Space and Terrestrial Applications Tibor S. Balint*, James A. Cutts, Elizabeth A. Kolawa, Craig E. Peterson Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, M/S 301-170U, Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 ABSTRACT Over the next decades, NASA’s planned solar system exploration missions are targeting planets, moons and small bodies, where spacecraft would be expected to encounter diverse extreme environmental (EE) conditions throughout their mission phases. These EE conditions are often coupled. For instance, near the surface of Venus and in the deep atmospheres of giant planets, probes would experience high temperatures and pressures. In the Jovian system low temperatures are coupled with high radiation. Other environments include thermal cycling, and corrosion. Mission operations could also introduce extreme conditions, due to atmospheric entry heat flux and deceleration. Some of these EE conditions are not unique to space missions; they can be encountered by terrestrial assets from the fields of defense, oil and gas, aerospace, and automotive industries. In this paper we outline the findings of NASA’s Extreme Environments Study Team, including discussions on state of the art and emerging capabilities related to environmental protection, tolerance and operations in EEs. We will also highlight cross cutting EE mitigation technologies, for example, between high g-load tolerant impactors for Europa and instrumented projectiles on Earth; high temperature electronics sensors on Jupiter deep probes and sensors inside jet engines; and pressure vessel technologies for Venus probes and sea bottom monitors. We will argue that synergistic development programs between these fields could be highly beneficial and cost effective for the various agencies and industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Environments - Ecology - Oxford Bibliographies
    Extreme Environments - Ecology - Oxford Bibliographies http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-97801998300... Extreme Environments Robert S. Boyd, Natasha Krell, Nishanta Rajakaruna LAST MODIFIED: 28 JUNE 2016 DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199830060-0152 Introduction The study of extreme environments is an exploration of the limits of life. Organisms perform a number of basic functions (homeostasis, metabolism, growth, reproduction, etc.), and our water- and carbon-based systems are constrained within certain environmental parameters. Some organisms can push the limits of these environmental boundaries and thrive in what to most other living things are conditions inimical to life. Thus the concept of “extreme” environment is necessarily relative to conditions under which most species thrive. Organisms that live in relatively hostile environments (called extremophiles) include archaea and bacteria, but other groups of organisms also have members that can live in relatively stressful habitats. Scientists point out that there is a difference between living under extreme conditions and tolerating (perhaps by going dormant) extreme conditions, but both situations can help us understand how extreme environments affect life. The adaptations that allow organisms to live in (or survive) extreme conditions are targets of scientific study because they help us understand life’s basic processes and how life responds to environmental challenges. The lessons we learn have important applied aspects because they can help us grow food, process wastes, restore disturbed habitats, and perform many other vital tasks. In this article, we provide sections based on particularly important stress factors, but we also have included sections in which the focus is on major concepts, to show how organisms from extreme environments can inform other areas of scientific interest.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19: Make It the Last Pandemic
    COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city of area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Report Design: Michelle Hopgood, Toronto, Canada Icon Illustrator: Janet McLeod Wortel Maps: Taylor Blake COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic by The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness & Response 2 of 86 Contents Preface 4 Abbreviations 6 1. Introduction 8 2. The devastating reality of the COVID-19 pandemic 10 3. The Panel’s call for immediate actions to stop the COVID-19 pandemic 12 4. What happened, what we’ve learned and what needs to change 15 4.1 Before the pandemic — the failure to take preparation seriously 15 4.2 A virus moving faster than the surveillance and alert system 21 4.2.1 The first reported cases 22 4.2.2 The declaration of a public health emergency of international concern 24 4.2.3 Two worlds at different speeds 26 4.3 Early responses lacked urgency and effectiveness 28 4.3.1 Successful countries were proactive, unsuccessful ones denied and delayed 31 4.3.2 The crisis in supplies 33 4.3.3 Lessons to be learnt from the early response 36 4.4 The failure to sustain the response in the face of the crisis 38 4.4.1 National health systems under enormous stress 38 4.4.2 Jobs at risk 38 4.4.3 Vaccine nationalism 41 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv.Org | Cornell University Library, July, 2019. 1
    arXiv.org | Cornell University Library, July, 2019. Extremophiles: a special or general case in the search for extra-terrestrial life? Ian von Hegner Aarhus University Abstract Since time immemorial life has been viewed as fragile, yet over the past few decades it has been found that many extreme environments are inhabited by organisms known as extremophiles. Knowledge of their emergence, adaptability, and limitations seems to provide a guideline for the search of extra-terrestrial life, since some extremophiles presumably can survive in extreme environments such as Mars, Europa, and Enceladus. Due to physico-chemical constraints, the first life necessarily came into existence at the lower limit of it‟s conceivable complexity. Thus, the first life could not have been an extremophile, furthermore, since biological evolution occurs over time, then the dual knowledge regarding what specific extremophiles are capable of, and to the analogue environment on extreme worlds, will not be sufficient as a search criterion. This is because, even though an extremophile can live in an extreme environment here-and-now, its ancestor however could not live in that very same environment in the past, which means that no contemporary extremophiles exist in that environment. Furthermore, a theoretical framework should be able to predict whether extremophiles can be considered a special or general case in the galaxy. Thus, a question is raised: does Earth‟s continuous habitability represent an extreme or average value for planets? Thus, dependent on whether it is difficult or easy for worlds to maintain the habitability, the search for extra- terrestrial life with a focus on extremophiles will either represent a search for dying worlds, or a search for special life on living worlds, focusing too narrowly on extreme values.
    [Show full text]
  • Community's Misconception About COVID-19 and Its Associated
    Mekonnen et al. Tropical Medicine and Health (2020) 48:99 Tropical Medicine https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00279-8 and Health RESEARCH Open Access Community’s misconception about COVID- 19 and its associated factors among Gondar town residents, Northwest Ethiopia Habtamu Sewunet Mekonnen1* , Abere Woretaw Azagew1, Chalachew Adugna Wubneh2, Getaneh Mulualem Belay2, Nega Tezera Assimamaw2, Chilot Desta Agegnehu3, Telake Azale4, Zelalem Nigussie Azene5, Mehari Woldemariam Merid6, Atalay Goshu Muluneh6, Demiss Mulatu Geberu7, Getahun Molla Kassa6, Melaku Kindie Yenit6, Sewbesew Yitayih Tilahun8, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye6, Animut Tagele Tamiru9, Bayew Kelkay Rade9, Eden Bishaw Taye10, Asefa Adimasu Taddese6, Zewudu Andualem11, Henok Dagne11, Kiros Terefe Gashaye12, Gebisa Guyasa Kabito11, Tesfaye Hambisa Mekonnen11, Sintayehu Daba Wami11, Jember Azanaw11, Tsegaye Adane11 and Mekuriaw Alemayehu11 Abstract Background: Despite the implementation of various strategies such as the declaration of COVID-19 emergency state, staying at home, lockdown, and massive protective equipment distribution, still COVID-19 is increasing alarmingly. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the community’s perception of COVID-19 and its associated factors in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was employed among 635 Gondar administrative town residents, from April 20 to April 27, 2020. Study participants were selected using a cluster sampling technique. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire. Epi-Data version 4.6 and STATA 14 were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. Logistic regressions (bivariable and multivariable) were performed to identify statistically significant variables at p <0.05. Results: Of the 635 study participants, 623 have completed the study with a 98.1% response rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Sequencing of SARS-Cov-2: a Guide to Implementation for Maximum Impact on Public Health
    Genomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 A guide to implementation for maximum impact on public health 8 January 2021 Genomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 A guide to implementation for maximum impact on public health 8 January 2021 Genomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: a guide to implementation for maximum impact on public health ISBN 978-92-4-001844-0 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-001845-7 (print version) © World Health Organization 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules/).
    [Show full text]
  • Slum Socio-Ecology: an Exploratory Characterisation of Vulnerability to Climate-Change Related Disasters in the Urban Context
    Slum socio-ecology: an exploratory characterisation of vulnerability to climate-change related disasters in the urban context Tilly Alcayna-Stevens Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and Universidad de Oviedo Supervisors: Professor Gregg Greenough and Professor Rafael Castro Date of submission: Wednesday 8 July 2015 This thesis entitled “Slum socio-ecology: an exploratory characterisation of vulnerability to climate-change related disasters in the urban context” is my own work. All sources of information (printed, on websites, etc.) reported by others are indicated in the list of references in accordance with the guidelines. Signature: Total word count: 9,858 I approve this thesis for submission ____________________(supervisor) Contents Glossary of terms .................................................................................................................................... 1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.1. Climate change ................................................................................................................ 5 1.1.2. Socio-Ecological Systems ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enzymes from Deep-Sea Microorganisms - Takami, Hideto
    EXTREMOPHILES – Vol. III - Enzymes from Deep-Sea Microorganisms - Takami, Hideto ENZYMES FROM DEEP-SEA MICROORGANISMS Takami, Hideto Microbial Genome Research Group, Japan Marine Science and Technology Center, 2- 15 Natsushima, Yokosuka, 237-0061 Japan Keywords: Mariana Trench, Challenger Deep, Deep-sea environments, Microbial flora, Bacteria, Actinomycetes, Yeast, Fungi, Extremophiles, Halophiles, 16S rDNA, Phylogenetic tree, Psychrophiles, Thermophiles, Alkaliphiles, Amylase, α- maltotetraohydrase (G4-amylase), Protease, Pseudomonas strain MS300, Hydrostatic pressure, Shinkai 2000, Shinkai 6500, Kaiko Contents 1. Introduction 2. Collection of Deep-sea Mud 3. Isolation of Microorganisms from Deep-sea Mud 3.1. Bacteria From The Mariana Trench 3.2. Bacteria From Other Deep-Sea Sites Located Off Southern Japan 4. 16S rDNA Sequences of Deep-sea Isolates 5. Exploring Unique Enzyme Producers Among Deep-sea Isolates 5.1. Screening for Amylase Producers 5.2. Purification of Amylase Produced By Pseudomonas Strain MS300 5.3. Enzyme Profiles Acknowledgments Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary In an attempt to characterize the microbial flora on the deep-sea floor, we isolated thousands of microbes from samples collected at various deep-sea (1 050–10 897 m) sites located in the Mariana Trench and off southern Japan. Various types of bacteria, such as alkaliphiles, thermophiles, psychrophiles, and halophiles were recovered on agar platesUNESCO at atmospheric pressure at a –frequency EOLSS of 0.8 x 102–2.3 x 104/g of dry sea mud. No acidophiles were recovered. Similarly, non extremophilic bacteria were recovered at a frequency of 8.1 x 102–2.3 x 105. These deep-sea isolates were widely distributed and detectedSAMPLE at each deep-sea site , andCHAPTERS the frequency of isolation of microbes from the deep-sea mud was not directly influenced by the depth of the sampling site.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Response and Recovery
    COVID-19 RESPONSE AND RECOVERY Nature-Based Solutions for People, Planet and Prosperity Recommendations for Policymakers November 2020 Nicole Schwab Elena Berger Co-Director Executive Director 1t.org Bank Information Center Patricia Zurita M. Sanjayan CEO CEO Birdlife International Conservation International Mark Gough Kathleen Rogers CEO President Capitals Coalition Earth Day Network Andrea Crosta Carlos Manuel Rodriguez Founder and Executive Director CEO and Chairperson Earth League International Global Environment Facility Wes Sechrest Paul Polman Chief Scientist and CEO Chair Global Wildlife Conservation Imagine Azzedine Downes Karen B. Strier President and CEO President International Fund for Animal Welfare International Primatological Society II Sylvia Earle Lucy Almond President and Chair Director and Chair Mission Blue Nature4Climate Jennifer Morris Bonnie Wyper CEO President The Nature Conservancy Thinking Animals United Justin Adams Cristián Samper Executive Director President and CEO Tropical Forest Alliance Wildlife Conservation Society Peter Bakker President and CEO Andrew Steer World Business Council for President and CEO Sustainable Development World Resources Institute Jodi Hilty Marco Lambertini President and Chief Scientist Director General Yellowstone to Yukon WWF International Conservation Initiative III Executive Summary COVID-19 highlights the critical connection between the health of nature and human health. This connection must be better reflected in our priorities, policies and actions. The root causes of this pandemic are common to many root causes of the climate change and biodiversity crises. Confronting these intertwined crises requires an integrated approach and unprecedented cooperation to achieve an equitable carbon-neutral, nature-positive economic recovery and a sustainable future. Our organizations’ recommendations to policymakers for meeting this challenge are offered below.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Pandemic: Prevention and Protection Measures to Be Adopted at the Workplace
    sustainability Protocol COVID-19 Pandemic: Prevention and Protection Measures to Be Adopted at the Workplace Luigi Cirrincione 1, Fulvio Plescia 1 , Caterina Ledda 2 , Venerando Rapisarda 2, Daniela Martorana 3, Raluca Emilia Moldovan 4, Kelly Theodoridou 5 and Emanuele Cannizzaro 1,* 1 Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties “Giuseppe D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (F.P.) 2 Occupational Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Catania Italy, 95131 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (V.R.) 3 Department of Orthopedics, Hospital Company “Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello” Palermo Italy, 90146 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Economics within Dimitrie Cantemir University of Targu Mures, 540680 Targu Mures, Romania; [email protected] 5 Department of Microbiology A Syggros University Hospital Athens Greece, 10552 Athens, Greece; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 April 2020; Accepted: 27 April 2020; Published: 29 April 2020 Abstract: SARS-CoV-2, identified in Wuhan, China, for the first time in December 2019, is a new viral strain, which has not been previously identified in humans; it can be transmitted both by air and via direct and indirect contact; however, the most frequent way it spreads is via droplets. Like the other viruses belonging to the same family of coronaviruses, it can cause from mild flu-like symptoms, such as cold, sore throat, cough and fever, to more severe ones such as pneumonia and breathing difficulties, and it can even lead to death.
    [Show full text]