Appendix VI Manitowoc River Basin Watershed Narratives and Tables
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Kark's Canoeing and Kayaking Guide to 309 Wisconsin Streams
Kark's Canoeing and Kayaking Guide to 309 Wisconsin Streams By Richard Kark May 2015 Introduction A Badger Stream Love Affair My fascination with rivers started near my hometown of Osage, Iowa on the Cedar River. High school buddies and I fished the river and canoe-camped along its lovely limestone bluffs. In 1969 I graduated from St. Olaf College in Minnesota and soon paddled my first Wisconsin stream. With my college sweetheart I spent three days and two nights canoe- camping from Taylors Falls to Stillwater on the St. Croix River. “Sweet Caroline” by Neil Diamond blared from our transistor radio as we floated this lovely stream which was designated a National Wild and Scenic River in 1968. Little did I know I would eventually explore more than 300 other Wisconsin streams. In the late 1970s I was preoccupied by my medical studies in Milwaukee but did find the time to explore some rivers. I recall canoeing the Oconto, Chippewa, Kickapoo, “Illinois Fox,” and West Twin Rivers during those years. Several of us traveled to the Peshtigo River and rafted “Roaring Rapids” with a commercial company. At the time I could not imagine riding this torrent in a canoe. We also rafted Piers Gorge on the Menomonee River. Our guide failed to avoid Volkswagen Rock over Mishicot Falls. We flipped and I experienced the second worst “swim” of my life. Was I deterred from whitewater? Just the opposite, it seems. By the late 1970s I was a practicing physician, but I found time for Wisconsin rivers. In 1979 I signed up for the tandem whitewater clinic run by the River Touring Section of the Sierra Club’s John Muir Chapter. -
Wisconsin's Water Quality
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Water Quality Bureau Division of Environmental Management EGAD #: 3200-2020-13 dnr.wi.gov 101 S Webster Street, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707-7921 Wisconsin’s 2020 Water Quality Report to Congress i Governor Tony Evers Natural Resources Board Dr. Frederick Prehn, Chair Gregory Kazmierski, Vice-Chair Julie Anderson, Secretary William Bruins Terry Hilgenberg Bill Smith Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Preston D. Cole, Secretary Beth Bier, Deputy Secretary Todd Ambs, Assistant Deputy Secretary Environmental Management Division Darsi Foss, Administrator Jim Zellmer, Deputy Administrator Adrian Stocks, Director, Water Quality Steve Galarneau, Director, Office of Great Waters Steve Elmore, Director, Drinking Water & Groundwater External Services Division Dave Siebert, Division Administrator Brian Weigel, Director, Watershed Management Michael Thompson, Director, Waterways Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Division Scott Loomans, Division Administrator Justine Hasz, Director, Fisheries Management Wisconsin’s 2020 Water Quality Report to Congress ii Wisconsin’s Water Quality Report The Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires all states to prepare a Water Quality Report to Congress every two years. This “Integrated Report” combines the CWA sections 305(b), 303(d), and 314. The report contains an overall summary of water quality conditions in the State and an updated Impaired Waters List. Wisconsin data are also provided electronically to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Integrated Reporting Process. Wisconsin’s 2020 Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress summarizes assessment progress and activities related to water quality protection during the past two years. This document is an online publication only that can be accessed at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) website: dnr.wi.gov Cover photo: Popple River in Florence County (2015). -
Context Statement for the Gloucester Subregion, PDF, 11.22 MB
Context statement for the Gloucester subregion Product 1.1 from the Northern Sydney Basin Bioregional Assessment 28 May 2014 A scientific collaboration between the Department of the Environment, Bureau of Meteorology, CSIRO and Geoscience Australia The Bioregional Assessment Programme The Bioregional Assessment Programme is a transparent and accessible programme of baseline assessments that increase the available science for decision making associated with coal seam gas and large coal mines. A bioregional assessment is a scientific analysis of the ecology, hydrology, geology and hydrogeology of a bioregion with explicit assessment of the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of coal seam gas and large coal mining development on water resources. This Programme draws on the best available scientific information and knowledge from many sources, including government, industry and regional communities, to produce bioregional assessments that are independent, scientifically robust, and relevant and meaningful at a regional scale. The Programme is funded by the Australian Government Department of the Environment. The Department of the Environment, Bureau of Meteorology, CSIRO and Geoscience Australia are collaborating to undertake bioregional assessments. For more information, visit <www.bioregionalassessments.gov.au>. Department of the Environment The Office of Water Science, within the Australian Government Department of the Environment, is strengthening the regulation of coal seam gas and large coal mining development by ensuring that future decisions are informed by substantially improved science and independent expert advice about the potential water related impacts of those developments. For more information, visit <www.environment.gov.au/coal-seam-gas-mining/>. Bureau of Meteorology The Bureau of Meteorology is Australia’s national weather, climate and water agency. -
Wpsc Manitowok
!JS EPA RECORDS CENTF.R REGION 5 llll llllllll lllll lllll 11111111111111 1111 516377 Record of Decision Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Manitowoc Former Manufactured Gas Plant Site Manitowoc, Wisconsin EPA ID: WIN000509949 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 September 2018 This page intentionally left blank. 11 Record of Decision - Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Manitowoc Former Manufactured Gas Plant Site This Record of Decision (ROD) documents the soil and groundwater source control remedy that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in consultation with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, selected for the first Operable Unit (OU I) of the Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (WPSC) Manitowoc Former Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Superfund Alternative Site (WPSC Manitowoc MGP Site, or Site) in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. Future RODs will address Site river sediment (OU 2) and groundwater (OU 3). The ROD is organized into three parts. Part I contains the Declaration, Part II contains the Decision Summary, and Part III contains the Responsiveness Summary, which addresses the public comments EPA received in response to the Proposed Plan for cleanup of OU I. 111 Acronyms and Definitions §NR Wisconsin Administrative Code pertaining to the Department of Natural Resources µg/L Micrograms per liter (also equals parts per million) µg/kg Micrograms per kilogram (also equals parts per billion) AOC Administrative Order on Consent ARAR Applicable -
Give Fish a Chance in the Port Stephens – Great Lakes Marine Park
Give Fish a Chance in the Port Stephens – Great Lakes Marine Park The Give Fish a Chance campaign is designed to promote the need for a comprehensive, adequate and representative system of marine sanctuaries in the Port Stephens – Great Lakes Marine Park. This will require up to half of all key marine habitats and all Grey Nurse Shark key habitats to be protected in marine sanctuaries. You can support this campaign by making a submission to the Port Stephens – Great Lakes Marine Park draft zoning plan. The Marine Park Authority is asking for comments on the draft zoning plan before 23rd September 2006. We encourage you to ask the NSW Government to Give Fish a Chance by supporting additional sanctuary zones by filling in the submission form attached. A key requirement of marine parks is to protect marine wildlife yet some of the areas with the highest biodiversity have only been partly protected. For example, large areas of seagrass meadows, vital to protect juvenile fish, in the Myall River remain inadequately protected. For the marine park to protect fish so they can breed, feed and recover in numbers, it needs to provide marine sanctuaries for up to half of each habitat type, including rocky reefs, islands, seagrass and sand. Snapper Island and Boondaba Island in Port Stephens, for example, are areas that deserve to be fully protected. Perhaps most importantly, many of the critically endangered Grey Nurse Shark key habitat areas receive only partial protection. Latitude Rock near Forster, Edith Breakers at Seal Rocks and Little Broughton Island near Port Stephens will receive insufficient protection if the current zoning plan goes ahead. -
Karuah Catchment Management Plan
Karuah Catchment Management Plan - Community and Stakeholder Forum Forum Outcomes Report PCB Consulting July 2014 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Our Vision ................................................................................................................................................ 2 What we love about our Karuah River Catchment ............................................................................. 3 What we hope for from the Karuah River Catchment Management Plan ......................................... 3 Our Catchment Values ............................................................................................................................ 4 Community / Social Value ................................................................................................................... 5 Economic Value ................................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental Value ........................................................................................................................... 5 Our Past ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Our Current Situation ............................................................................................................................. -
Marlborough Rivers and Their Margins
The Natural Character of selected Marlborough Rivers and their margins May 2014 C10003 Prepared for Marlborough District Council (MDC) Updated Report May 2014 Boffa Miskell Limited: James Bentley, Sally Bishop, Alistair Marshall, Brian McAuslan, Marlborough District Council: Pere Hawes, Peter Hamill This report draws on the findings of the following report: ‘Natural Character: Application of the River Significance Assessment Method to Marlborough District’, past of the River Values Assessment System: Volume 2: Application to cultural, production and environment values. LEaP Report No. 24B, Lincoln University, New Zealand: Neil Deans (Nelson - Marlborough Fish and Game) Val Wadsworth (Marlborough District Council) Brin Williman (Marlborough District Council) Allan Rackham (Boffa Miskell) James Bentley (Boffa Miskell) The Natural Character of selected Marlborough Rivers and their margins The winding nature of the Wairau River channel and its The ox-bow lake of Grove Arm in the Wairau Plain broad semi-braided river bed. Much of the lower banks of the river are lined by willows and gorse. Contents A Section A: INTRODUCTION AND STUDY PROCESS 5 Introduction 6 Study Process 7 B Section B: APPLICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY 9 Definition of Natural Character 10 Naturalness 10 Natural Character Values of Rivers and their margins 14 The River Environment Classification System (REC) 14 Assessment Criteria 16 C Section C SELECTED RIVERS & THEIR MARGINS IN THE MARLBOROUGH REGION 23 Marlborough’s Rivers 24 Wairau River 26 Awatere River 28 Rai and Pelorus Rivers 29 Clarence River 30 Other Rivers within Marlborough 30 D Section D: EVALUATION OF SELECTED RIVERS AND THEIR MARGINS 33 Inventory of Selected Marlborough Rivers 34 E Section E REFERENCES 47 References 48 Websites 48 Section A: INTRODUCTION AND STUDY PROCESS 6 Introduction Marlborough District Council (MDC) engaged Boffa and Mapping the Marlborough Coastal Environment, Miskell Ltd (BML) to assess selected rivers and their (2014), Boffa Miskell et al’. -
Redundant Weir Removal: the Branch River Crossing - a Case Study
Redundant Weir Removal: The Branch River Crossing - A Case Study THE BRANCH RIVER Other industries that are important to FRESHWATER CROSSING the region include commercial fishing and oyster farming, which are strongly The Project linked to local waterways and rely on a The removal of the Branch River healthy catchment. Crossing is part of a larger weir removal project being undertaken by WWF History Australia, the Environmental Trust of The Branch River Crossing was NSW and NSW Fisheries, with another constructed in 1951 by the Colonial 2 redundant weirs to be removed over Sugar Refinery (CSR) for timber the next 12 months. This project aims to hauling to the mills. At that time a small increase public awareness of the township with a sawmill, school, environmental effects of in-stream several homesteads and a general store barriers. It provides a framework to was located beside the crossing. Fishing facilitate community-based weir was a popular activity for the locals as removal projects and demonstrates the both fresh and saltwater habitats were ecological benefits of improved river available. People also travelled upriver, health. The weir removal framework by boat, from Port Stephens to fish and will assist in the development of similar to take advantage of social occasions projects throughout Australia in the (Anon. 1987). future. Current Use Location The Branch River Crossing is no longer The Branch River Crossing is located used by CSR and is now the near Port Stephens in the Karuah River responsibility of the Great Lakes Catchment, NSW, about 22 km NNE of Council. Land adjacent to the crossing Karuah. -
Land & Water Resource Management Plan 2020
Land & Water Resource Management Plan 2020 - 2029 CALUMET COUNTY LAND & WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 – 2029 Approved By the Wisconsin Land & Water Conservation Board on: Approved by the Calumet County Board on: Approved by Wisconsin DATCP on: MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS Anthony Reali, County Conservationist Danielle Santry, Water Resource Specialist Calumet County Land & Water Conservation Department MISSION STATEMENT To preserve, protect, and enhance the natural resources of Calumet County by assisting land users in adopting wise and sustainable land use practices. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Calumet County’s Land and Water Resource Management Plan was developed with help from a group of concerned residents with diverse backgrounds and federal and state resource professionals. Special thanks are extended to the following people: Citizen Advisory Committee Adam Faust Nick Dallman Kristen Birschbach Joe Brantmeier Lyle Ott Bob Nagel Joseph Hanke Corey Schmidt Wilmer Geiser Mike Hofberger Jeremy Hansen Nick Vande Hey Calumet County Land & Water Conservation Committee Mike Hofberger (Chair) Dave LaShay Patrick Laughrin Judith Hartl Merlin Gentz Amy Shiplett Agency Advisory Committee & DNR Basin Leaders & Professionals Erin Carviou Daniel Block Keith Marquardt Amber O’Brien James Kasdorf Liz Heinen Adam Nickel Frank Kirschling Joe Smedberg Steve Easterly Tom Schneider Dale Rebezek Mary Gansberg Crystal Von Holdt Land & Water Conservation Department Staff Anthony Reali – County Conservationist Jared Grunewald – Conservation Project Technician Danielle Santry -
Indigenous and Minority Placenames
Indigenous and Minority Placenames Indigenous and Minority Placenames Australian and International Perspectives Edited by Ian D. Clark, Luise Hercus and Laura Kostanski Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Clark, Ian D., 1958- author. Title: Indigenous and minority placenames : Australian and international perspectives Ian D. Clark, Luise Hercus and Laura Kostanski. Series: Aboriginal history monograph; ISBN: 9781925021622 (paperback) 9781925021639 (ebook) Subjects: Names, Geographical--Aboriginal Australian. Names, Geographical--Australia. Other Authors/Contributors: Hercus, Luise, author. Kostanski, Laura, author. Dewey Number: 919.4003 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Nic Welbourn and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2014 ANU Press Contents Notes on Contributors . .vii 1 . Introduction: Indigenous and Minority Placenames – Australian and International Perspectives . 1 Ian D. Clark, Luise Hercus, and Laura Kostanski 2 . Comitative placenames in central NSW . 11 David Nash 3. The diminutive suffix dool- in placenames of central north NSW 39 David Nash 4 . Placenames as a guide to language distribution in the Upper Hunter, and the landnám problem in Australian toponomastics . 57 Jim Wafer 5 . Illuminating the cave names of Gundungurra country . 83 Jim Smith 6 . Doing things with toponyms: the pragmatics of placenames in Western Arnhem Land . -
Bronze Battler October 2016
CLUB NEWS th Bass Catch October 15-16 2016 See details scribed by Rico van de Kerkhof in the first article. Presidents Message Dear club members, already this year’s Bass fishing season has been interesting and I most warmly look forward to seeing you at our club meeting on Tuesday at Northmead Bowling Club and again at this coming weekend, as we undertake our October Bass Catch on the 15th and 16th, with camping commencing on the 14th at Yellomundee Regional Park. See Rico’s article for full details, registration and tight lines. Alan Izzard. The Editors Message Welcome to the October 2016 edition of Bronze Battler – it’s a bumper edition. Mostly due to my inability to create the August 2016 edition. Some articles have been held back to this October edition and I thank the authors for their patience. I also thank all contributors immensely and if you’re in need of immense thanking – 1 send me your fishing adventures, spell checked, punctuated and prose perfect with pictures. So for the record, there wasn’t an August edition due to the editor’s inability to juggle life’s events. Some have said it was because he can’t land Australian Salmon and in some ways this is perfectly true, and not just salmon, I’ve been dropping luderick also. I worry my fishing has turned into a spectator sport – whereby I watch others catching fish. I hope you enjoy this edition, I’m privileged to have read the advanced submissions and it’s got me quite excited, I’m really looking forward to our up and coming Bass Sydney events. -
Report Advisian
INFRASTRUCTURE & ENGINEERING ATTACHMENT A REPORT ON PUBLIC EXHIBITION – KARUAH RIVER AND STROUD FLOODPLAIN RISK MANAGEMENT STUDY AND PLAN ORDINARY MEETING 26 FEBRUARY 2020 MidCoast Council Karuah River and Stroud Flood Study Update Volume 1 – Report Karuah River and Stroud Flood Study Update Volume 1 - Draft Report DRAFT Level 17, 141 Walker St North Sydney NSW 2060 Australia Revision B October 2019 rp301015-03792lc_crt190928-Karuah River & Stroud FS_Volume 1.docm www.advisian.com MidCoast Council Karuah River and Stroud Flood Study Update Volume 1 – Report Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of MidCoast Council, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between MidCoast Council and Advisian. Advisian accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Copying this report without the permission of MidCoast Council and Advisian is not permitted. Cover Photo: Floodwaters flowing across Cowper Street, Stroud on the morning of 21st April 2015 (Source: Gloucester Advocate) Project No: 301015-03792 Project: Karuah River & Stroud Flood Study Update Volume 1: Report Advisian Rev Description Author Review Date DRAFTApproval 0 Draft for Internal Review LC 31/01/2018 L Collins A Draft Report – Issued for Council LC CRT 5/02/2018 Review L Collins C Thomas B Draft Report for Public Exhibition LC CRT 23/10/2019 L Collins C Thomas Chris Thomas rp301015-03792lc_crt190928-Karuah River & Stroud FS_Volume 1 MidCoast Council Karuah River and Stroud Flood Study Update Volume 1 – Report Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................