AK This Bibliography May Seem Long (More Than 3000 Items), but It Has a Great Many Omissions. the IPCC

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AK This Bibliography May Seem Long (More Than 3000 Items), but It Has a Great Many Omissions. the IPCC THIS IS THE TEXT OF AN ESSAY IN THE WEB SITE “THE DISCOVERY OF GLOBAL WARMING” BY SPENCER WEART, HTTP://WWW.AIP.ORG/HISTORY/CLIMATE. AUGUST 2021. HYPERLINKS WITHIN THAT SITE ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS FILE. FOR AN OVERVIEW SEE THE BOOK OF THE SAME TITLE (HARVARD UNIV. PRESS, REV. ED. 2008). COPYRIGHT © 2003-2021 SPENCER WEART & AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS. Bibliography Part I: A-K This bibliography may seem long (more than 3000 items), but it has a great many omissions. The IPCC reports have by far the most complete bibliography for recent scientific work. Nearly all, but not all, of the items below are referenced somewhere in these essays. Abbreviations used in the notes in the essays: AIP: Niels Bohr Library at the American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD LDEO: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY SIO: Scripps Institution of Oceanography Archives, La Jolla, CA Abarbanel, Albert, and Thomas McCluskey (1950). “Is the World Getting Warmer?” Saturday Evening Post 223, (1 July), pp. 22-23, 57-63. Abbott, Benjamin W., et al. (2016). “Biomass Offsets Little or None of Permafrost Carbon Release from Soils, Streams, and Wildfire: An Expert Assessment.” Environmental Research Letters 11: 034014 [doi:10.1088-1748-9326-11-3-034014]. Abbot, Charles G., and F.E. Fowle, Jr. (1908). “Income and Outgo of Heat from the Earth, and the Dependence of Its Temperature Thereon.” Annals of the Astrophysical Observatory (Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC) 2: 159-176. Abbot, Charles G., and F.E. Fowle, Jr. (1913). “Volcanoes and Climate.” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 60: 1-24. Abbot, Charles G. (1967). “Precipitation in Five Continents.” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 151. Abelmann, Andrea , et al. (2006). “Extensive Phytoplankton Blooms in the Atlantic Sector of the Glacial Southern Ocean.” Paleoceanography 21: PA1013 [doi:10.1029/2005PA001199, 2006]. Abelson, P.H. (1977). “Energy and Climate.” Science 197: 941. Abe-Ouchi, Ayako, et al. (2013). “Insolation-Driven 100,000-Year Glacial Cycles and Hysteresis of Ice-Sheet Volume.” Nature 500: 190-93 [doi:10.1038/nature12374]. Abel, Guy J., et al. (2019). “Climate, Conflict and Forced Migration.” Global Environmental Change 54: 239-49 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.12.003]. Abetti, Giorgio (1957). The Sun. New York: Macmillan. Weart DGW 8/21 Bibl I p. 2 Abraham, J.P., et al. (2013). “A Review of Global Ocean Temperature Observations: Implications for Ocean Heat Content Estimates and Climate Change.” Reviews of Geophysics 51 450-83 [doi: 10.1002/rog.20022]. Achermann, Dania (2020). “Vertical Glaciology: The Second Discovery of the Third Dimension in Climate Research.” Centaurus 62: 720-43 [doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12294], online at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1600-0498.12294. Ackerman, Andrew S., et al. (2000). “Effects of Aerosols on Cloud Albedo: Evaluation of Twomey’s Parameters of Cloud Susceptibility Using Measurements of Ship Tracks.” J. Atmospheric Sciences 57: 2684-95. Adabashev, I. (1966). Global Engineering. Moscow: Progress. Adem, Julian (1965). “Experiments Aiming at Monthly and Seasonal Numerical Weather Prediction.” Monthly Weather Review 93: 495-503. Adler, Jerry (2007). “Moment of Truth.” Newsweek (April 16), pp. 45-48. Ager, Derek (1993). The New Catastrophism: The Importance of the Rare Event in Geological History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Agrawala, Shardul (1997). Explaining the Evolution of the IPCC Structure and Process. ENRP Discussion Paper E-97-05,, Cambridge, MA, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Agrawala, Shardul (1998a). “Context and Early Origins of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change.” Climatic Change 39: 605-20. Agrawala, Shardul (1998b). “Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change.” Climatic Change 39: 621-42. Agrawala, Shardul (1999a). “Early Science-Policy Interactions in Global Climate Change: Lessons from the Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases.” Global Environmental Change 9: 157-69. Agrawala, Shardul (1999b). Science Advisory Mechanisms in Multilateral Decisionmaking: Three Models from the Global Climate Change Regime. Diss., Princeton University: Ahlmann, H.W. (1952). “Glacier Variations and Climatic Fluctuations.” Bowman Memorial Lectures, American Geographical Society Ser. 3, no. 1. Ahmed, Moinuddin, et al. (2013). “Continental-Scale Temperature Variability During the Past Two Millennia.” Nature Geoscience 6: 339-46 [doi:10.1038/ngeo1797]. Weart DGW 8/21 Bibl I p. 3 Ai, Xuyuan E., et al. (2020). “Southern Ocean Upwelling, Earth’s Obliquity, and Glacial- Interglacial Atmospheric CO2 Change “ Science 370: 1348-52 [doi:10.1126/science.abd2115]. Aitken, A. R. A., et al. (2016). “Repeated Large-Scale Retreat and Advance of Totten Glacier Indicated by Inland Bed Erosion.” Nature 533: 385-89 [doi:10.1038/nature17447]. Albrecht, Bruce A. (1989). “Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness.” Science 245: 1227-30. Aldrich, L.B., and W.H. Hoover (1954). “Annals of the Astrophysical Observatory, Smithsonian Institution 7: 1-184. Alexander, Tom (1974). “Ominous Changes in the World’s Weather.” Fortune 89, no. 2 (Feb.), pp. 90-95, 142-52. Allen, M. (2003). “Liability for Climate Change.” Nature 421: 891-892 [doi:10.1038/421891a]. Allen, M.R., et al. (2006). “Quantifying Anthropogenic Influence on Recent near-Surface Temperature Change.” Surveys in Geophysics 27: 491-544 [doi:10.1007/s10712-006- 9011-6]. Allen, Myles R., et al. (2009). “Warming Caused by Cumulative Carbon Emissions Towards the Trillionth Tonne.” Nature 458: 1163-66 [doi:10.1038/nature08019]. Allen, Robert J., and Steven C. Sherwood (2008). “Warming Maximum in the Tropical Upper Troposphere Deduced from Thermal Wind.” Nature Geoscience 1: 399 403 [doi:10.1038/ngeo208]. Alley, Richard B., et al. (1993). “Abrupt Increase in Snow Accumulation at the End of the Younger Dryas Event.” Nature 362: 527-29. Alley, Richard B., et al. (1995). “Comparison of Deep Ice Cores.” Nature 373: 393-94. Alley, Richard B. (1998). “Palaeoclimatology: Icing the North Atlantic.” Nature 392: 335-37. Alley, Richard B., and Peter U. Clark (1999). “The Deglaciation of the Northern Hemisphere: A Global Perspective.” Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 27: 149-82 Alley, Richard B. (2000). The Two-Mile Time Machine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Alley, R.B., et al. (2003). “Abrupt Climate Change.” Science 299: 205-10 [doi:10.1126/science.1081056]. Weart DGW 8/21 Bibl I p. 4 Alley, Richard B., et al. (2005). “Ice-Sheet and Sea-Level Changes.” Science 310: 456-60 [doi:10.1126/science.1114613]. Alley, Richard B., et al. (2020). “Twenty-First Century Sea-Level Rise Could Exceed IPCC Projections for Strong-Warming Futures.” One Earth 3: 691-703 [doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.11.002]. Alvarez, Luis W., et al. (1980). “Extraterrestrial Cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction.” Science 208: 1095-1108. Alvarez, Ramón A., et al. (2018). “Assessment of Methane Emissions from the U.S. Oil and Gas Supply Chain.” Science 361: 186-88 [doi:10.1126/science.aar7204] Alvarez, Walter, et al. (1984). “The End of the Cretaceous: Sharp Boundary or Gradual Transition?” Science 223: 1183-86. American Geophysical Union (1999). “Position Statement Adopted on Climate Change and Greenhouse Gases.” Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 80: 49. American Meteorological Society (2013). “Explaining Extreme Events of 2012 from a Climate Perspective, Special Supplement.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Vol. 94, No. 9. American Meteorological Society (Herring, S. C., et al., eds.) (2018). “Explaining Extreme Events of 2016 from a Climate Perspective.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 99: S1-S157, online at https://www.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/publications/bulletin-of-the-american- meteorological-society-bams/explaining-extreme-events-from-a-climate-perspective/. American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change (2010). Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-Faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges. http://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change.aspx. Anagnostou, Eleni, et al. (2016). “Changing Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Was the Primary Driver of Early Cenozoic Climate.” Nature 533: 380-84 [doi:10.1038/nature17423]. Anderegg, William R. L., et al. (2010). “Expert Credibility in Climate Change.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 [doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107]. Anderegg, William R. L., et al. (2015). “Tropical Nighttime Warming as a Dominant Driver of Variability in the Terrestrial Carbon Sink.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 15591-96 [doi:10.1073/pnas.1521479112]. Anderegg, William R. L., et al. (2021). “Anthropogenic Climate Change Is Worsening North Weart DGW 8/21 Bibl I p. 5 American Pollen Seasons.” Publications of the National Academy of Sciences 118: e2013284118 [doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013284118]. Anderson, Christopher (1992). “How Much Green in the Greenhouse?” Nature 356: 369. Anderson, Neil R., and Alexander Malahoff (1977) The Fate of Fossil Fuel CO2 in the Oceans. New York: Plenum. Anderson, Theodore L., et al. (2003). “Climate Forcing by Aerosols -- a Hazy Picture.” Science 300: 1103-04. Andersson, G. (1902). “Hasseln I Sverige Fordom Och Nu.” Sveriges Geoliska Undersökning, Afhand C2. Andreae, Meinrat O. (1996). “Raising Dust in the Greenhouse.” Nature 380: 389-90. Andreae, Meinrat O. (2001). “The Dark
Recommended publications
  • The Weather Makers Re-‐Examined
    THE WEATHER MAKERS RE-EXAMINED BIAS NEW RELEASE 400 page BOOK by Dr D W Allen Baseless Selection Reporting See details at bottom of spreadsheet Misinterpretation Misrepresentation Failed Preditions Failed Confusing / Silly Confusing Important Facts Important Suspect Source Suspect No uncertainty No Contradictory Exaggeration Factual Error Factual Half-truth Half-truth Dogmatic Flannery Statements Mistakes Extreme Allen Comments - mostly shortened Title - The Weather Makers Page 1 Weather is not climate / nature makes weather Climate change a threat to civilisation (R Purves) Foreword 1 Global cooling is the greater threat a theory is only valid for as long as it has not been disproved 2 1 Who could disprove that Tim will go to a special monkey heaven! Pollutants - known as greenhouse gases 3 1 Water vapour & CO2 pollutants? By 1975, the first sophisticated computer models 4 1 1 They were very primitive / still not sophisticated enough The heart of Earth's thermostat is CO2 5 1 Water is much more important the gas lasts around a century in the atmosphere 5 1 1 1 57% of it is naturally sequested within a year GHG reached levels not seen for millions of years 6 1 1 CO2 reached 348ppm during the early Holocene Replacing 4WD with a hybrid reduces GHG by 70% 6 1 1 It can actually increase global GHG emissions Vote for a politician who will sign Kyoto 8 1 Signing Kyoto in 2007 made no difference to emissions SECTION 1 - GAIA'S TOOLS Drop of 0.1% in solar radiation reaching Earth can trigger an 14 1 1 Compare with next statement ice age smog can cut sunlight by 10% and heat the lower environment Smoke (which is what he is referring to) blocks sunlight, cooling the 107 1 1 and ocean lower environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientist, Spring 2008
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks The Scientist (College of Science) College of Science Spring 1-1-2008 The Scientist, Spring 2008 San Jose State University, College of Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/scientist Recommended Citation San Jose State University, College of Science, "The Scientist, Spring 2008" (2008). The Scientist (College of Science). 2. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/scientist/2 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Science at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Scientist (College of Science) by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volume 12, Number 1 Spring 2008 College of Science San José State University The Scientist Message from the Dean Inside this issue: It’s been a busy I am also very pleased to an- Message from the 1 year here at the College of nounce that Dr. Singmaster Dean Science. Building on the has been designated the Geology: 2 great work of a planning SJSU Professor of the Year, a The Millers We are very pleased team made up of faculty, well deserved honor recog- to welcome our new Develop- Michael Graham: staff, and students that met nizing her years of selfless ment officer, Carol Beattie, 2 Kelp Discovery at a retreat at Asilomar a dedication to our students, who joined the university ad- year ago, we have nearly as well as her remarkable vancement staff in January. Physics and finalized plans for a College- teaching abilities. Carol has extensive experi- Astronomy 3 wide advising center, which We are continuing to ence in industry, consulting 2007 Highlights we hope will turn into a one- develop Professional Science and working with non-profits stop-shop for students in all Master’s programs that are such as the Children’s Health Mathematics News 4 departments of the college.
    [Show full text]
  • Tim Flannery, the Weather Makers: the History and Future Impact of Climate Change
    Tim Flannery, The Weather Makers: The History and Future Impact of Climate Change. Melbourne: Text Publishing, 2005. ISBN 1-920-88584-6 Paul Starr There are three modes of analysis in Tim Flannery’s recent climate change book: the historical, the diagnostic, and the prescriptive. The first two modes – charting the history of climate change, the history of climate science, and working out the parameters of our current predicament – take up almost all of the book. The move into prescription out of diagnosis, into what people can do to avoid or mitigate the impacts of climate change, happens in the last pages of the book, and this imbalance points to an important bind in which popular non-fiction writing about climate change for a general audience often finds itself. I will come back to this bind at the end of this review. Tim Flannery is well known in Australia, and to a lesser extent overseas, as a science- based provocateur. Earlier books based on his fieldwork in Papua New Guinea have drawn on archaeology and anthropology to explain issues such as biodiversity loss to a general audience. Books such as The Future Eaters and Throwim Way Leg contributed to popular debates on issues as diverse as the impacts of human cultures on historical ecosystems and the causes of past extinction events (such as those of Australian giant marsupials), through to the capacity of current societies to see how their behaviours contribute to, or detract from, the quality of human and non-human futures. Climate change was in many ways a new subject for Flannery.
    [Show full text]
  • Government: the View from Washington, DC
    THIS IS THE TEXT OF AN ESSAY IN THE WEB SITE “THE DISCOVERY OF GLOBAL WARMING” BY SPENCER WEART, HTTP://WWW.AIP.ORG/HISTORY/CLIMATE. JULY 2007. HYPERLINKS WITHIN THAT SITE ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS FILE. FOR AN OVERVIEW SEE THE BOOK OF THE SAME TITLE (HARVARD UNIV. PRESS, 2003). COPYRIGHT © 2003-2007 SPENCER WEART & AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS. Government: The View from Washington, DC The money that paid for research on climate change came mostly from governments. Governments were also central to any practical actions that might address global warming. Following the Second World War, the United States Federal government funded many kinds of research, much of it connected to Cold War concerns, and some of this happened to relate to climate change. During the 1960s, the government created major agencies for space, atmospheric, and ocean science, and in the 1970s, as public concern for the environment mounted, the agencies increasingly supported research targeted directly at climate change. But climate scientists were too few and disorganized to push through a unified national research program. Their budgets, divided among different agencies, would rise for a few years and then stagnate. During the 1980s, the funding and the science itself came under attack. The technical question of whether climate change might be a threat got caught up in political battles between pro-regulation environmentalists and anti-government conservatives. Demands for policies to mitigate global warming found little support among American politicians, who thought the ideas were politically unfeasible if not downright pernicious. (This essay covers only the United States government—the most important by far, in terms of influence and domestic greenhouse gas production.
    [Show full text]
  • 14.9 Solar Climate MH
    NATURE|Vol 443|14 September 2006 NEWS FEATURE A CCOSMICOSMIC CCONNECTIONONNECTION Physicists and climate scientists have long argued over whether changes to the Sun affect the Earth’s climate? A cloud chamber could help clear up the dispute, reports Jeff Kanipe. he cloud chamber, invented by C. T. R. for the cosmic rays. And a team of atmospheric clouds and cosmic rays was made in 1997 in Wilson at the start of the twentieth physicists, chemists and space scientists from the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial century, opened a new microcosmos nine countries will try to see how they affect Physics by Henrik Svensmark and his colleague Tto human examination. Droplets of cloud formation1. Eigil Friis-Christensen2. The two researchers water coalescing around ions in a chamber sat- The CLOUD chamber has various bells and were then with the Danish Meteorological urated with water vapour provided physicists whistles that its particle-focused forerunners Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark, and are with a way of visualizing particles; tracks left lacked, such as control systems to simulate now at the Danish Space Research Institute, by the particles were preserved like contrails parcels of air rising through the atmosphere also in Copenhagen. Svensmark and Friis- across the sky (see ‘The first cloud maker’, and a ‘field cage’ to generate an electric field Christensen noted that from 1987 to 1990, overleaf). In the second half of the century, similar to that found in fair-weather clouds. global cloudiness fell by approximately 3% though, the technology was eclipsed — first The chamber can generate a range of water- and that the number of cosmic rays reaching by bubble chambers and then by a range of vapour supersaturations (relative humidity the Earth dipped by 3.5%, a fluctuation that other devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Uts Marine Biology Fact Sheet
    UTS MARINE BIOLOGY FACT SHEET Topic: Phytoplankton and Cloud Formation 1.The CLAW Hypothesis Background: In 1987 four people (Charlson, Lovelock, Andrea, & Warren) introduced a theory that a natural gas called Dimethylsulfide (DMS), produced by microscopic plants in the ocean (phytoplankton), was a major contributor to the formation of clouds in the atmosphere. This theory was named the CLAW Hypothesis (from the first letter of each of their surnames). Fast facts: . Phytoplankton produce DMSP (dimethylsulphoniopropionate), an organic sulphur compound, which is converted to DMS in the ocean. The majority of this DMS is consumed by bacteria but around 10% escapes into the atmosphere. When DMS is released into the air, a chemical reaction takes place (called an oxidation reaction) and sulphate aerosols are formed – a gas which acts as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). This means it combines with water droplets in the atmosphere to form clouds. As a result, more clouds increase the reflectivity of the sun’s rays (earth albedo) which decreases the amount of light reaching the earth’s surface, and contributes to cooling the overall climate. A decrease in light causes a decrease in phytoplankton productivity of DMS. (Phytoplankton are primary producers which rely on light to function). This sequence of events is called a Negative Feedback Loop, because phytoplankton increase DMS production but DMS forms clouds which lowers the amount of light reaching the earth, resulting in less phytoplankton and less DMS. DMS emissions are a key step in the global sulphur cycle, which circulates sulphur throughout the earth, oceans, and atmosphere. It is an essential component in the growth of all living things.
    [Show full text]
  • For Bibliography by Year, See the Website)
    THIS IS THE TEXT OF A BIBLIOGRAPHY IN THE WEB SITE “THE DISCOVERY OF GLOBAL WARMING” BY SPENCER WEART, HTTP://WWW.AIP.ORG/HISTORY/CLIMATE. FEBRUARY 2014. COPYRIGHT © 2003-2014 SPENCER WEART & AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS Bibliography by Author (for Bibliography by Year, see the Website) This bibliography may seem long (more than 2500 items), but it has a great many omissions. Please see the discussion of sources in the “Method” essay. Note in particular that the IPCC reports have by far the most complete bibliography for recent scientific work. Abbreviations used in the notes: AIP: Niels Bohr Library at the American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD LDEO: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY SIO: Scripps Institution of Oceanography Archives, La Jolla, CA Abarbenel, Albert, and Thomas McCluskey (1950). “Is the World Getting Warmer?” Saturday Evening Post, 1 July, pp. 22-23, 57-63. Abbot, Charles G., and F.E. Fowle, Jr. (1908). “Income and Outgo of Heat from the Earth, and the Dependence of Its Temperature Thereon.” Annals of the Astrophysical Observatory (Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC) 2: 159-176. Abbot, Charles G., and F.E. Fowle, Jr. (1913). “Volcanoes and Climate.” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 60(29): 1-24. Abbot, Charles G. (1967). “Precipitation in Five Continents.” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 151(5). Abelmann, Andrea, et al. (2006). “Extensive Phytoplankton Blooms in the Atlantic Sector of the Glacial Southern Ocean.” Paleoceanography 21: PA1013 [doi:10.1029/2005PA001199, 2006]. Abelson, P.H. (1977). “Energy and Climate.” Science 197: 941. Abe-Ouchi, Ayako, et al. (2013). “Insolation-Driven 100,000-Year Glacial Cycles and Hysteresis of Ice-Sheet Volume.” Nature 500: 190-93 [doi:10.1038/nature12374].
    [Show full text]
  • The Dilemma of Reticence: Helmut Landsberg, Stephen Schneider, and Public Communication of Climate Risk, 1971-1976
    History of Meteorology 6 (2014) 53 The Dilemma of Reticence: Helmut Landsberg, Stephen Schneider, and public communication of climate risk, 1971-1976 Gabriel Henderson Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark “Most of the crucial issues of human survival that will confront humanity over the next few decades will call for ethical and political value judgments – decisions on how to act in the face of uncertainties. … Human value judgments are too important to be left exclusively to the experts.” – Stephen Schneider1 “Science is not as objective as some people think. Often human value judgments (or even prejudices) make things move as much as curiosity or the search for answers as to ‘why.’” – Helmut Landsberg2 During the tumultuous mid-1970s, when energy and food shortages, environmental pollution, and political instability induced suspicions that America was increasingly susceptible to increased climatic instability, American climatologists Helmut Landsberg and Stephen Schneider disagreed strongly on whether scientists should engage the public about the future risks and urgency of climate change. On the one hand, Schneider, a young climate modeler with the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), expressed explicitly an unwillingness to embrace reticence as an appropriate response to the risks of climate change. To illustrate the gravity of the situation, he frequently resorted to vivid and frightening metaphors to convince the public and policy makers that I want to express my gratitude to Ruth Morgan and the anonymous reviewer who contributed thoughtful suggestions to improve and refine the scope of this article. I would also like to thank my colleagues at the Center for Science Studies at Aarhus University for their suggestions to strengthen my narrative and flow of argument: Dania Achermann, Matthias Heymann, and Janet Martin-Nielsen.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Engineering“
    Lecture „Climate Engineering“ 1. Introduction Ulrich Platt Institut für Umweltphysik Lecture Program of „Climate Engineering Part 1: Introduction to the Climate System (4 sessions) 1. Introduction and scope of the lecture 2. The Climate System – Radiation Balance 3. Elements of the Climate System - Greenhouse Gases, Clouds, Aerosol 4. Dynamics of the Climate System - Sensitivity, Predictions Part 2: Climate Engineering Methods - Solar Radiation Management, SRM 1. SRM – Reflectors in space 2. SRM – Aerosol in the Stratosphere 3. SRM – Cloud Whitening 4. SRM – Anything else Part 3: Climate Engineering Methods – Carbon Dioxide Removal, CDR 1. Direct CO 2 removal from air 2. Alkalinity to the ocean (enhanced weathering) 3. Ocean fertilization 4. Removal of other greenhouse gases Part 4: CE – Effectiveness, Side Effects (3 sessions) 1. Comparison of Techniques, characterisation of side effects 2. Other parameters than temperature 3. Summary 2 Contents of Today's Lecture • Global Warming - „Climate Change“ • What is Climate Engineering • Why Climate Engineering? • Physics of Climate – which knobs to turn? • „Leverage“ of CE-Techniques • Techniques to influence the climate, examples • Even stranger ideas • Conclusion Literature Bodansky, D. (1996), 'May we Engineer the Climate?', Climatic Change 33 , 309-321. Boyd, P. W. (2008), 'Ranking geo-engineering schemes', Nature Geoscience 1, 722-724. Cicerone, R. J. (2006), Geoengineering: Encouraging research and overseeing implementation, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, chapter Climatic Change, pp. 221-226. Crutzen, P. J. (2006), 'Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?', Climatic Change 77(3-4), 211--220. Feichter, J. & Leisner, T. (2009), 'Climate engineering: A critical review of approaches to modify the global energy balance', The European Physical Journal - Special Topics 176(1), 81--92 Hegerl, G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Surprising and Unambiguous Policy Relevance of the Cuban Missile Crisis James G
    CIGI PAPERS no. 8 — OCTOBER 2012 ZERO: THE SURPRISING AND UNAMBIGUOUS POLICY RELEVANCE OF THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS JAMES G. BLIGHT AND jANET M. LANG ZERO: THE SURPRISING AND UNAMBIGUOUS POLICY RELEVANCE OF THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS James G. Blight and janet M. Lang Copyright © 2012 by The Centre for International Governance Innovation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Centre for International Governance Innovation or its Operating Board of Directors or International Board of Governors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution — Non-commercial — No Derivatives License. To view this license, visit (www.creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). For re-use or distribution, please include this copyright notice. Cover and page design by Steve Cross. Cover art by Chang Dai. 57 Erb Street West Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2 Canada tel +1 519 885 2444 fax + 1 519 885 5450 www.cigionline.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 About the Authors 4 Needed: One Small- to Medium-sized Nuclear War (or an Equivalent) 5 The Argument: Zero is Necessary; Zero is Not Possible Since …; But Zero Would Be Possible if … 5 The Clear and Present Danger: Armageddon 5 The US-Russian Problem: Residual Mistrust, Inertia and Wariness 5 The New Nuclear Nation Problem: Enmity, Blackmail and Survival 6 The Israeli Problem: Maintaining a Nuclear Monopoly in the Middle East 6 The Iranian Problem: An Isolated, Intransigent Regime in a Very Tough Neighbourhood 6 The Pseudo-solution: What-ifs? 7 The Psychological Problem: Global Governance without an Engine 7 A Psychological Solution for a Psychological Problem: Cuba in the Missile Crisis 8 A Little Good News: The United States and Russia Have Reduced Nuclear Stockpiles 8 A Lot of Bad News: What-if? What-if? What-if? What-if? What-if? and, um, What-if? 10 “We Lucked Out!”: A Psychological Engine for the Zero Narrative 10 Delete “What-if,” Enter “What Actually Happened” 12 An Armageddon Letter: Fidel Castro to Nikita Khrushchev, Sent at 7:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • M1 Project: Climate - Biosphere Interactions Using ODE Models
    M1 Project: Climate - Biosphere interactions using ODE models Jan Rombouts Erasmus Mundus Master in Complex Systems Science Ecole´ Polytechnique, Paris Supervisors: Michael Ghil, Regis Ferri`ere Ecole´ Normal Sup´erieure,Paris June 30, 2014 Abstract There are many examples of the complex interactions of climate and vegetation through various feedback mechanisms. Climatic models have begun to take into ac- count vegetation as an important player in the evolution of the climate. Climate models range from complicated, large scale GCMs to simple conceptual models. It is this last type of modeling that I looked at in my project. Conceptual models usually use differential equations and techniques from dynamical systems theory to investi- gate basic mechanisms in the climate system. They have in particular been applied to investigate glacial-interglacial cycles. These models have not often included vege- tation as one of their variables, and this is what I've looked at in the project. First I investigate a simple, two equation model, and show that even in such a simple model, interesting oscillatory behaviour can be observed. Then I go on to study models with three equations, based on an existing model for temperature and ice sheet evolution. I extend this model in two ways: by adding a vegetation variable, and by adding a carbon dioxide variable. Again, oscillations are observed, but the existence depends on parameters that are linked to the vegetation. Finally I put it all together in a model with four equations. These models show that vegetation is an important factor, and can account for some specific features of glacial-interglacial cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercise 10: Cumulus Cloud with Bulk Cloud Physics
    Exercise Hints Tasks Results Exercise 10: Cumulus Cloud With Bulk Cloud Physics PALM group Institute of Meteorology and Climatology, Leibniz Universität Hannover last update: 21st September 2015 PALM group PALM Seminar 1 / 16 I Initialize the simulation with a marine, cumulus-topped, trade-wind region boundary layer. I Trigger the cloud by a bubble of rising warm air. I Parameterize condensation using a simple bulk cloud physics scheme. I Learn how to carry out conditional averages. Exercise Hints Tasks Results Exercise Exercise 10: Cumulus Cloud With Bulk Cloud Physics Simulate a cumulus cloud: PALM group PALM Seminar 2 / 16 I Trigger the cloud by a bubble of rising warm air. I Parameterize condensation using a simple bulk cloud physics scheme. I Learn how to carry out conditional averages. Exercise Hints Tasks Results Exercise Exercise 10: Cumulus Cloud With Bulk Cloud Physics Simulate a cumulus cloud: I Initialize the simulation with a marine, cumulus-topped, trade-wind region boundary layer. PALM group PALM Seminar 2 / 16 I Parameterize condensation using a simple bulk cloud physics scheme. I Learn how to carry out conditional averages. Exercise Hints Tasks Results Exercise Exercise 10: Cumulus Cloud With Bulk Cloud Physics Simulate a cumulus cloud: I Initialize the simulation with a marine, cumulus-topped, trade-wind region boundary layer. I Trigger the cloud by a bubble of rising warm air. PALM group PALM Seminar 2 / 16 I Learn how to carry out conditional averages. Exercise Hints Tasks Results Exercise Exercise 10: Cumulus Cloud With Bulk Cloud Physics Simulate a cumulus cloud: I Initialize the simulation with a marine, cumulus-topped, trade-wind region boundary layer.
    [Show full text]