DOCSLIB.ORG

Joe Justice on Agile Manufacturing Learning Consortium Webinar Q&A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joe Justice on Agile Manufacturing Learning Consortium Webinar Q&A Joe Justice on Agile Manufacturing Learning Consortium Webinar Q&A October 21, 2105 1. How do you deal with certification cycles of federal authorities such as the FDA, FCC, etc., in the context of an Agile manufacturing approach? I would highly recommend the Scrum Inc. webinar “Agile Testing” to take you through the best we’ve seen so far. http://www.scruminc.com/scrumlab-prime/ 2. XMfg - How different is it from the factory model followed in batch jobs production in the manufacturing industry? XMfg practices reduce the cost to make change to the line and the product. This can support batch jobs or one-piece continuous flow. The fastest manufacturing method we’ve seen so far is massively parallel concurrent manufacturing, which funnels work more like a current- generation hyper-threading CPU than a traditional line flow such as batch jobs or one-piece continuous flow. And ultimately XMfg allows the company to affordably iterate more towards this pattern each sprint, again by lowering the cost (in time and money) to make change. 3. Can this be applicable for a nonprofit, high-scale contemporary art exhibition (50-plus projects, two years)? If there is a clear vision (which is encouraged to evolve, but clear at any given point in time), these approaches will apply. And I’d love to see it; please email [email protected] if you try it! If you would like help getting started, I’ll invite you to attend a Certified ScrumMaster class: http://www.scruminc.com/scrum-training/scrum-courses-list/ 4. How long did it take to "print" the carbon car you witnessed at the trade show? Cincinnati BAAM completed the Local Motors DDM (direct digital manufacturing) porotype car during the two-day exhibition. I’m not sure if they ran the machine the entire time or not. While I’m immensely impressed with the speed and flexibility of the BAAM, after holding pieces of the car I was underwhelmed by their significant weight increase relative to other composites. In my own company, we continue to manufacture by subtractive rapid prototyping foam blocks, then wrapping them in carbon fiber for same-day unique structural assemblies. To get hands-on with this, I’d like to invite you to any of the Scrum Inc. Certified ScrumMaster classes hosted in Seattle, which include a Thursday after-class opportunity to build part of a WikiSpeed car with us. http://www.scruminc.com/scrum-training/scrum-courses-list/ 5. Some industries have very stringent configuration control requirements (e.g., aerospace). How can you maintain these requirements and execute this iterative/Scrum approach? I’d recommend the “Agile Testing” webinar to you: http://www.scruminc.com/scrumlab-prime/ 6. How are hardware and software teams melding their Scrum teams? The fastest I’ve seen are cross-functional teams of hardware and software, where the product owner owns the budget and ROI for their module of the total solution. A set of cruise missile teams I’ve worked with is doing this to great effect. Many companies find good gains by having an engaged PO of a software team and an engaged PO of a hardware team, with a Chief PO grooming the backlog from which both those POs pull. These teams aren’t quite as fast as the cross-functional hardware and software teams, but still multiples of speed over traditional silos and a non- team-based approach. For more on that, you may want to watch any of the five webinars on “Scrum at Scale.” http://www.scruminc.com/scrumlab-prime/ When you are ready to implement it, I’ll invite you to a “Scrum at Scale” class: http://www.scruminc.com/scrum-training/scrum-courses-list/ 7. Could you also provide an example from medical devices industry? Philips MRI, Tecan automated and semiautomated lab equipment, have done a Scrum launch, but I haven’t been back to see if they have maintained it. The companies I mentioned in the webinar, parts of 3M medical, robotic pharmacies at MedCo, divisions of GE Healthcare, and GE FastWorks. That’s to name a few. Feel free to attend a Certified ScrumMaster® class and work with the team, and me, through your team learning log, to explain your context. http://www.scruminc.com/scrum-training/scrum-courses-list/ 8. Please explain the Delphi estimation method mentioned. I’d like to invite you to one of our Certified ScrumMaster classes, where the technique is presented and practiced on the second day of the class. http://www.scruminc.com/scrum-training/scrum-courses-list/ 9. With a different product, such as PHP, will Scrum always be the best methodology? Scrum’s super power is that it is a framework for identifying what is slowing you down from reaching your goal and removing those things slowing you down or making the journey less happy. In addition to that broad use, Scrum itself is continually refined as new audited data is published from the hundreds of thousands of Scrum teams in flight. Yes, like any construct I suspect there will be a limit to the applications of Scrum, but I suspect that will be after the sun has died. 10. What aspects do we need to consider to create a Scrum contract with a client? I would recommend the webinar “Agile Contracting.” http://www.scruminc.com/scrumlab-prime/ 11. Can someone talk about backlog refinement, sizing of work items, and demonstration in terms of Agile manufacturing? We have to in order to make evidence-based decisions. Please replay the slide on Boeing’s 737 manufacturing process, current challenges and next steps, from the Scrum Alliance Learning Consortium webinar: https://www.scrumalliance.org/why-scrum/learning-consortium/learning- consortium-webinars/joe-justice-on-agile-manufacturing The 45-minute webinar “Extreme Manufacturing” may also be useful to you in this case: http://www.scruminc.com/scrumlab-prime/ 12. How does Rocket bunny-scale their production to mass produce parts after the initial rapid prototyping? In this case, the rapid prototyping method is the mass-manufacturing method. In my own hobby car company, WikiSpeed, we use the same technique. If a machine can produce one foam mold a day, we add a machine in parallel. With ten machines in parallel, each run by a Scrum team, more parts could be made than cars of a given type Ferrari sells in a year. The machine used by team WikiSpeed to do this is $2,700. I’d recommend watching the “eXtreme Manufacturing” webinar to dive more deeply: http://www.scruminc.com/scrumlab-prime/ 13. Any examples of established automotive companies (OEMs) doing Scrum, e.g., BMW? I am not aware of any automotive manufacturer that doesn’t have at least some Scrum, in software or management or marketing. In manufacturing, Johnson Controls has it in their Seating division. Volvo does in their platform design. Tesla almost does, they are super-close with some known stable interfaces and modularity, but not across the entire product. To all Tesla employees: In my opinion your companies is inches from being even more amazing. I invite you to enroll in our CSM® class here: http://www.scruminc.com/scrum-training/scrum-courses-list/ 14. Have you seen distributed/remote Scrum teams in manufacturing companies, and if so what successes or challenges have they experienced? I have. The challenges are of the same variety as [for] software teams: having similar setups in each site aids remote pairing. Good video chat etiquette and a video chat portal that’s always on aids team building, which ramps up velocity. Version control of the CAD files to machine form is just as important as version control of the code base for distributed software teams, in my experience. I’d recommend the 45-minute webinar “Distributed Scrum” at http://www.scruminc.com/scrumlab-prime/. And, to implement it, I will invite you to attend our “Scrum at Scale” course. http://www.scruminc.com/scrum-training/scrum-courses-list/ 15. Changing the way we do things might be faster than changing the actual factory machinery having investment/ROI periods of years. What advice would you give to someone who defers Scrum introduction with the long ROI of machinery? The cost-of-delay calculation will of course let you know when it makes sense to invest in new machinery and disrupt competition versus the cost of being disrupted by a competitor who emerges having already implemented XMfg. If the time to invest is not yet, organizing management and Lean cells using Scrum still fits with no change in machinery. For that, I’d recommend starting with a “Scrum Leadership Workshop” to establish the beginning of your Scrum-in-hardware transformation. http://www.scruminc.com/scrum-consulting-coaching/ 16. How can a ScrumMaster with no manufacturing experience start working with manufacturing companies? We are asked this almost every week — the demand for hardware Scrum experts greatly exceeds the supply! To get started, I’d recommend our “Scrum in Hardware, Train the Trainer” course. I’d also recommend watching about eight hours of “How It’s Made” and touring as many factories as will entertain your request. While that’s happening, make sure you have a current CSM and CSPO® certification. Since the clients are going to ask you how the Scrum teams coordinate, also enroll in a Scrum at Scale class. Then start filling in, if you haven’t already, your CSC and/or CST® application, and come on in to our Scrum in Hardware Train the Trainer class. Then, I do believe, you will be well prepared to rock the socks off many types of hardware companies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critical Success Factors for Agile Project Management in Non- Software Related Product Development Teams
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 12-2017 Critical Success Factors for Agile Project Management in Non- Software Related Product Development Teams Jeff Totten Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, and the Instructional Media Design Commons Recommended Citation Totten, Jeff, "Critical Success Factors for Agile Project Management in Non-Software Related Product Development Teams" (2017). Dissertations. 3178. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/3178 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN NON-SOFTWARE RELATED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TEAMS by Jeff Totten A dissertation submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Educational Leadership, Research, and Technology Western Michigan University December 2017 Doctoral Committee: Louann Bierlein Palmer, Ed.D., Chair David Szabla, Ed.D. Daniel Gaymer, Ph.D. CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN NON-SOFTWARE RELATED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TEAMS Jeff Totten, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2017 The use of agile project management methods in the software development industry is well established and researched. The purpose of this study is to understand whether agile project management methods (Scrum in particular) used successfully in the software industry are also being used in full, or in part, in non-software development industries when managing product development projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Programming from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Search Extreme programming From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Extreme programming (XP) is a software development methodology which is Contents intended to improve software quality and responsiveness to changing customer Featured content requirements. As a type of agile software development,[1][2][3] it advocates frequent Current events "releases" in short development cycles, which is intended to improve productivity Random article and introduce checkpoints at which new customer requirements can be adopted. Donate to Wikipedia Wikipedia store Other elements of extreme programming include: programming in pairs or doing Interaction extensive code review, unit testing of all code, avoiding programming of features Help until they are actually needed, a flat management structure, simplicity and clarity in About Wikipedia code, expecting changes in the customer's requirements as time passes and the Community portal problem is better understood, and frequent communication with the customer and Recent changes among programmers.[2][3][4] The methodology takes its name from the idea that the Contact page Planning and feedback loops in beneficial elements of traditional software engineering practices are taken to extreme programming. Tools "extreme" levels. As an example, code reviews are considered a beneficial What links here practice; taken to the extreme, code can be reviewed continuously, i.e. the practice Related changes Software development of pair programming. Upload file process Special pages Critics have noted several potential drawbacks,[5] including problems with Core activities Permanent link unstable requirements, no documented compromises of user conflicts, and a Requirements · Design · Construction · Testing · Debugging · Deployment · Page information lack of an overall design specification or document.
    [Show full text]
  • AGILE @ HARDWARE MANUFACTURING Smash Your Time-To-Market, Boost Innovative Potential and Change the Game in Your Industry with These Innovative Methods and Practices
    AGILE @ HARDWARE MANUFACTURING Smash your time-to-market, boost innovative potential and change the game in your industry with these innovative methods and practices. A GLADWELL ACADEMY & BLINKLANE CONSULTING WHITE PAPER T: +31 (0)20 24 022 44 | E: [email protected] gladwellacademy.com CONTENTS WHY BRING AGILE IDEAS TO HARDWARE DEVELOPMENT? Why bring Agile ideas to hardware development? 3 The advantages of working Agile have been a revolution for the world of software Why not? 5 development - and following that, for much of the business world in general. From services firms to municipal governments, the promise of Agile ideas is irresistibly convincing. Agile methodology for the hardware environment 6 � The ability to ‘turn on a dime, for a dime’. Product-centered and process-centered approaches 8 � The ability to drastically reduce time-to-market. � The increased sense of empowerment that pervades all layers of the organization, so even the humblest coder feels like they might improve the entire company - Case studies 12 given a valuable enough insight. � The ability to improve client collaboration during development, by effectively The course ‘Agile for Hardware’ 16 responding to new insights and changing requirements. � The earnest commitment to customer value, rather than to internal goals and priorities. ‘Certified Hardware Agilist’ 18 � The substantial elimination of waste from the equation. About the authors 19 THE DIFFERENCE DISAPPEARS The proliferation of Agile ways of working beyond software developers goes hand in hand with the increased popularity of software development itself, though. More and more organizations are building in-house software development departments to support the increased digitalization of their services.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrum for Hardware, with Joe Justice of WIKISPEED and Scrum Inc, USA
    ! Podcast Episode #10 – How to think like Elon Musk – Scrum for Hardware, with Joe Justice of WIKISPEED and Scrum Inc, USA RAW TRANSCRIPT OF INTERVIEW Balint: Today I have a special guest. If there was a black belt in his field, he would certainly be one of its holders. He's a master of a type of project management, an in- novation method - Agile. Specifically, he's into Scrum, which is the most commonly used Agile method. My guest is Joe Justice from the US, president of Scrum Inc. Hardware at Scrum Inc., and founder of a company called Team WIKISPEED, which is still very much alive. Welcome, Joe, to this episode. Joe: Balint, thanks so much for having me on your Hardware Entrepreneur Podcast. I'm excited to be a part of it and share the best of what I’m learning with your audi- ence. Balint: I'm very excited to talk to you now and share this knowledge because I think you have very valuable points to make which I would try to bring out. We’ve met a few times when you visited Zurich where you regularly give some courses and talks on Scrum through your involvement at Scrum Inc. I've been impressed by your en- thusiasm and, of course, also by your results, every time I hear you give a talk or also a webinar, which I attended today, on Scrum in automotive. I'm equally impressed also whenever I read about Scrum method published by your colleague Jeff Suther- land who is the CEO of Scrum Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Agile Transformation from Agile Experiments to Operating Model Transformation: How Do You Compare to Others?
    Agile Transformation From Agile experiments to operating model transformation: How do you compare to others? 2019 Survey on Agility 2 Preface Preface What comes to mind when you think of Agile? Driven by leadership ambition to remain relevant in the digital future, we see in both our Global CEO Outlook 2019 and our Harvey Nash/KPMG CIO Survey 2019 that Agile is Do you think of IT? Realising results fast? Developing software? increasingly a strategic priority towards becoming future ready. In this survey, we would Or do you think broader? like to dive into this topic further and involve the target operating model on how Agile can ― Working as a team? be implemented. ― Working with multiple self-organising teams? ― Collaborating with customers? We see that we live in a diverse world – our survey shows Agile maturity is different from ― Integrating business and IT? country to country. Originally a European survey, we concluded the survey with responses from more than 120 participants from 17 countries, which include: There is no single answer. Originally defined in 2001 in the Agile Manifesto as a reaction to ― Argentina ― Denmark ― Poland the slow, bureaucratic and stifled creativity experienced in traditional waterfall methods of ― Austria ― France ― Singapore software development, Agile formed the basis for a revolution in the way software is ― Belgium ― Germany ― Sweden developed. ― Bolivia ― Hong Kong SAR ― The Netherlands ― Brazil ― Italy ― Turkey Nowadays we see this revolution increasing its footprint as principles to define entire ― Czech Republic ― Norway organisations and is vastly outgrowing the development of software on a team level. Digitisation is driving the need for flexibility and the increased role of technology in We hope you enjoy our survey; that it contributes to your insights on how to apply agility delivering value.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speed to Cool
    Agile Methods in Minutes Craig Smith Welcome… Let’s Go! Foundations Manifesto for -- Agile Software Development Manifesto for -- Agile Software Development Values Signatories 17 signatories 2001 agilemanifesto.org Principles 1 Scrum 1 Scrum “A framework within which people can address complex adaptive problems, while productively and creatively delivering products of the highest possible value.” Process Basis for most iterative processes / methods currently in use. Opinion Roles + Theory - Jeff Sutherland / Ken Schwaber 1996 scrumguides.org 1a Scrumbut (Scrumand) 1a ScrumBut (ScrumAnd) “We're doing Scrum but...” “We use Scrum and...” ScrumBut vs ScrumAnd ScrumAnd framework ScrumBut "We're doing Scrum but..." our sprints are 12 weeks long” ScrumAnd “We use Scrum and we are collaborating and brainstorming within the Scrum Team to increase value every Sprint.” Eric Gunnerson 2006 blogs.msdn.com/b/ericgu/archive/2006/10/13/scrumbut.aspx Ken Schwaber 2008 kenschwaber.wordpress.com/2012/04/05/scrum-but-replaced-by-scrum-and/ 2 Extreme Programming (XP) 2 Extreme Programming (XP) “Extreme Programming is the first popular methodology to view software development as an exercise in coding rather than an exercise in management.” Practices Process Principles + Practices have become Values - software engineering good practice Opinion Kent Beck 1996 extremeprogramming.org 3 Crystal 3 Crystal “Crystal is a family of human-powered, adaptive, ultralight, “stretch-to-fit” software development methodologies… designed to scale by project size and criticality”
    [Show full text]
  • Agile Methodologies in Product Development Case: Discrete Manufacturing and Assembly
    AGILE METHODOLOGIES IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CASE: DISCRETE MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY Master's thesis Visamäki, Strategic Leading of Technology-based Business Spring 2019 Tero Lappalainen ABSTRACT Strategic Leading of Technology-based Business Visamäki Author Tero Lappalainen Year 2019 Title Agile Methodologies in Product Development Case: Discrete Manufacturing and Assembly Supervisor(s) Jukka Pulkkinen ABSTRACT During last years, the most successful ICT companies has adopted Agile methodologies. What happens when these methods are used in totally different industry? Rapid product development cycles and managing continuously changing priorities are key attributes in developing highly customized products. Aim of this action research was to understand, whether Discrete Manufacturing and Assembly Company's product development process required changes, could design work benefit from agile practices, how new operation model can be implemented and what kind of results it will deliver. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used to understand current situation and requirement for change. In parallel, a literature and media study were made of methodologies with highest adoption and growth, and industry specific applications. Based on this information, a framework comparison according subject’s prerequisites and a recommendation of most suitable frameworks was made. This was followed by a new operating model description, implementation of required tools and introduction of new model. After and before surveys and comparison of design release volumes for past two years was conducted to evaluate the change impact. Based on the results, a following conclusion was made. Using agile methodology and practices led into increased process clarity, better support for design of high-quality products and increased transparency and communication perceived by process contributors.
    [Show full text]