DOCSLIB.ORG

Responses Received on the Pre-Publication Local Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

All responses received to the Local Plan Review Pre-Publication consultation and Sustainability Appraisal www.richmond.gov.uk/local_plan_pre-publication.htm Consultation from 8 July until 19 August 2016 Published by LBRuT on 14 October 2016 Please note, the responses below are as received from the respondents and have not been edited by the Council. They are not alphabetically ordered or in any other order of priority. Name / Organisation Name / Organisation Caroline Brock, Kew Society Cllr Martin Elengorn, Environment Spokesperson Richmond upon Thames Jenine Langrish Liberal Democrat Councillors Group Myrna Jelman Rob Gray, Friends of the River Crane Environment (FORCE) Cllr David Linnette Liz Ayres, Richmond Clinical Commissioning Group Richard Geary Wendy Crammond, Co-Chair Kew Residents Association Heather Mathew, Richmond CVS Ben Mackworth-Praed, on behalf of the Barnes Community Association Helene Jelman Kevin Goodwin, RPS CgMs for Goldcrest Land Dale Greetham, Sport England Sarah Stevens, Turleys for British Land Katharine Fletcher, Historic England Paul Massey Charles Pineles, Planning Spokesman, Richmond Society Tim Lennon, Borough Coordinator Richmond Cycling Campaign Peter Willan, Old Deer Park Working Group Matthew Eyre, RPS CgMs on behalf of Historic Royal Palaces (HRP) Celeste Giusti, Greater London Authority on behalf of Mayor of London Brian Willman, Chair Ham and Petersham Neighbourhood Forum Robert Leadbetter, Hon. Director Hampton and Kempton Waterworks Mike Allsop, Committee member Strawberry Hill Residents' Association Railway Geoff Bond, Chair Ham and Petersham Association Robert Deanwood, Amec Foster Wheeler on behalf of National Grid George Burgess, Indigo Planning on behalf of Beechcroft Developments Alison Mackay, Colliers on behalf of Greggs Plc Ltd Tom Sadler, Bilfinger GVA on behalf of Defence Infrastructure Neil Henderson, Gerald Eve on behalf of Reselton Properties Ltd Organisation Alice Roberts, CPRE London Judith Livesey, NLP Planning on behalf of St Paul's School Janet Nuttall, Natural England James Togher, Environment Agency Tim Sturgess, Bilfinger GVA on behalf of The Lady Eleanor Holles School William Mortimer Unity Harvey Tim Catchpole, Planning Representative Mortlake with East Sheen Society David Taylor Andrew Dorrian, Transport for London Sam Hobson, Quantum Group Rachel Botcherby, Planning Advisor, London and South East National Trust Richard Barnes, The Woodland Trust Lucy Owen, Port of London Authority All responses received on the Local Plan Pre-Publication Consultation 1 Name / Organisation Name / Organisation Kevin Scott, Kevin Scott Consultancy Ltd on behalf of Port Hampton Dinesh Vitharanage Estates Limited Cllr Liz Jaeger Sarah Dixey, London Borough of Wandsworth Fabio Galvano Katharine Harrison, Surrey County Council Caroline Britton Mike Mills, Firstplan Ltd on behalf of Maxicorp Ltd Peter Britton Tanja El Sanadidy, Indigo on behalf of Shepherd Enterprises Limited Kathleen Massey Maria Walker Jane Morrison Stephen Rankin Ray Morrison Sally Arnold, Planning Potential Ltd on behalf of Power Leisure Laura Stritch, Transport for London Bookmakers Jane Bond Ross Anthony, The Theatres Trust Savills on behalf of Thames Water Mel Barlow-Graham, London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority Martin Kirrage Bethany Evans, NLP Planning on behalf of The Harrodian School Anna Smith Krystyna Kujawinska David Yates Steve Simms, SSA Planning Limited on behalf of Kentucky Fried Chicken Geoff Bond, Chair Martingales Close Residents' Association (Great Britain) Limited Dale and Juliet Nolan Michelle Hatton-Smith Andrew & Bryony Barnard Spelthorne Borough Council Gilda Rogner Helen Harris, Cushman and Wakefield on behalf of Royal Mail Group Ltd Tess Pinto, 20th Century Society James Sheppard, CBRE on behalf of LGC Ltd Peter Dowling, Indigo Planning on behalf of Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd Strategic Planning Team, Royal Borough of Kingston Charlotte Gibb, St Mary's University Emily Vyse, Brooke Smith Planning on behalf of Ancient Order of Forester's Peter Willan, Chair for The Friends of Richmond Green Friendly Society Ltd Marie Claire Marsh, NLP Planning on behalf of RFU Christian Leigh on behalf of Jane Miller Paul Velluet Jamie Wallace, CgMs on behalf of Notting Hill Home Ownership Tor Barrett, NLP Planning on behalf of the West London Mental Health Caroline Wilberforce, Indigo Planning on behalf of on behalf of Sharpe NHS Trust Refinery Service Joanne Merritt Teresa Gonet, Highways Agency David Deaton Paul Luton Mark Jopling, The Teddington Society and the Friends of Udney Park Eliza Shaw Playing Fields Anthony Paish Lesley Forster Table 1: All respondents to the consultation John Finnerty All responses received on the Local Plan Pre-Publication Consultation 2 About you Part A of the response form asked about yourself or who you are responding on behalf of. There were a total of 103 respondents to the Local Plan pre-publication consultation. Of those, 31 (29%) respondents answered some or all of the questions in the About You section. The figures below reflect only those who answered ‘yes’ and does not include those who answered ‘no’. Note that some respondents ticked yes to multiple options, e.g. they live, work and run a business in the borough, and these are all included separately in the figures below. • Live in the borough: 18 • Work in the borough: 13 • Run a business in the borough: 14 • Student in the borough: 1 • Visitor to the borough: 1 Your General Views Part B of the response form asked about views on the Strategic Vision, Strategic Objectives and Spatial Strategy. Strategic Vision 27 respondents answered this question. The breakdown of responses is as follows: Strongly agree: 1, Agree: 13, Neither agree/disagree: 10, Disagree: 3 Do you agree or disagree with the Strategic Vision (section 2.2)? Agree or strongly agree Neither agree / disagree Disagree Strategic Objectives 25 respondents answered this question. The breakdown of responses is as follows: Strongly agree: 2, Agree: 9, Neither agree/disagree: 10, Disagree: 4 All responses received on the Local Plan Pre-Publication Consultation 3 Do you agree or disagree with the Strategic Objectives (section 2.3)? Agree or strongly agree Neither agree / disagree Disagree Spatial Strategy 24 respondents answered this question. The breakdown of responses is as follows: Strongly agree: 1, Agree: 7, Neither agree/disagree: 12, Disagree: 4 Do you agree or disagree with the Spatial Strategy (section 3.1)? Agree or strongly agree Neither agree / disagree Disagree Summary: A small proportion of respondents (between 24 and 27 of the 103 total) responded to these questions about the extent to which they agree with the Vision, Objectives and Strategy. Those who did not respond have not been included. More respondents agree than disagree with the vision, objectives and spatial strategy. The option ‘neither agree nor disagree’ was a popular option across the three questions with between one third and one half of respondents selecting this option on each question. In cases where respondents disagree this tends to be because of a specific issue that they were responding about and this detail is picked up in the tables (below / separate). All responses received on the Local Plan Pre-Publication Consultation 4 Ref. Name / Organisation Strategic Vision Comments Strategic Objectives Comments Spatial Strategy Comments No. 1 Richard Geary I have read the draft Local Plan but it does not seem to bear any relation to reality. There is already an Area Plan that has not been adhered to. 2 Judith Livesey, NLP The School broadly agrees with the strategic vision, The School agrees with the Council's strategic The School acknowledges the principle of Planning on behalf of noting specifically that: Access to a range of objectives including those relating to education protecting open space that makes a valuable St Paul's School education facilities is important, including schools provision and housing and the need for a range contribution to the Borough, however, as set within the independent sector which make an of homes that are affordable. It notes that out the detailed response, there is a need to important contribution to education provision education provision will need to be delivered review the boundary of the Metropolitan Open within the Borough. It is important to provide a through development, including extensions of Land (MOL) to ensure that the delivery of wide choice of homes, particularly affordable homes existing sites. Specific reference to the need for required facilities is not unduly fettered or of varying types. In the case of St Paul's School there development would provide a clearer complicated by historic boundaries that are out is an urgent need to provide accommodation for indication of what is required and be of date or relate to land that does not function staff that is affordable in order to retain staff and consistent with proposed Policy LP29. as MOL or meet the criteria for designation. A support future recruitment. review through the plan process would be consistent with London Plan policy in relation to MOL and NPPF policy relating to Green Belt. For this reason the School objects to protecting existing areas of MOL as specified at para 3.1.12 (specifically at the St Paul's School site) in the absence of such a review. 3 Myrna Jelman Your intentions on every count seem spot on. I See above but in summary I would like more would have liked to see the Council be much more ambition on public transport and more innovative and ambitious in solving public transport accountability to the public. issues. I also enjoyed reading that accountability to the public is one of 4 strategic vision bullets in the report and was then very unhappy that no reference to accountability be placed anywhere else. As a resident dealing on almost a weekly basis with RHP (Richmond Housing Partnership) for example, I feel very little accountability in that organisation which is allowed to fail to deliver results for years, unchecked. At the end of the 200 something pages, there is no invitation to provide comments and finding how to leave the feedback was not clear.
Recommended publications
  • The Expertise Behind the World's Water and Wastewater Solutions

    The Expertise Behind the World's Water and Wastewater Solutions

    The expertise behind the world’S water and wastewater solutionS 60 major cases from around the world Only 2,5 percent of the world’s total water supply is freshwater. Out of that 2,5 percent, 70 percent is contained in glaciers, 29 percent is held in underground aquifers, while freshwater lakes, rivers and streams make up one percent. 2| Innovation throughout the cycle of water Clean water for everyone –that’s our goal. In aworld A small number of companies are developing the of ever growing challenges, ITT delivers innovative necessary range of solutions and applications solutions throughout the cycle of water. We are the knowledge that cover the entire cycle of water use world’s largest provider of water and wastewater and reuse. ITT is at the forefront of this transition. treatment solutions. And we are a leading provider of pumps and related technologies for aindustrial, SETTING THE INDUSTRY STANDARD commercial and municipal customers. Operating in some 140 countries, we manufacture and market a comprehensive range of water and Organizations facing challenging water issues are drainage pumps, units for primary, secondary and increasingly turning to experts who have the breadth tertiary treatment, and products for treating water of capability to own and resolve such challenges. through biological, filtering and disinfection These experts employ holistic solutions that incorporate processes. We also maintain the industry’s most a range of skills encompassing both technical and extensive sales and after-sales organization, with 70 commercial innovation. sales companies operating both locally and globally. CONTENT Water Treatment......................................................................7 Wastewater Treatment ..........................................................19 Water & Wastewater Transport ..............................................31 |3 Every week an estimated 42,000 people die from diseases related to low-quality drinking water and lack of sanitation.
  • Pre-Submission Development Management Plan and Proposal Map Review and Changes

    Pre-Submission Development Management Plan and Proposal Map Review and Changes

    Local Development Framework Pre-Submission Development Management Plan Proposal Map Review & Changes for consultation 29th January – 12th March 2010 Based Upon Ordnance Survey data. © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100019441 [2006]. If you need this document in Braille, large print, audio tape, or another language, please contact us on 020 8891 7322 or minicom 020 8831 6001 Albanian Arabic Bengali Farsi Gujarati Punjabi Urdu Development Management DPD Review of designations Contents 1 Purpose of this document 4 2 Review of designations 4 2.1 Green Belt and Major Developed site in the Green Belt 4 2.2 Metropolitan Open Land 5 2.3 Public Open Space 6 2.4 Other Open Land of Townscape Importance 8 2.5 Thames Policy Area 13 2.6 Areas in Need of Tree Planting 13 2.7 Views and Vistas 13 2.8 Town Centre boundaries and Areas of Mixed Use 14 2.9 Retail Frontages 14 3 Development Management DPD Review of designations 1 Purpose of this document The Council is currently working on the Local Development Framework (LDF), which will replace the Unitary Development Plan (UDP) with a “folder” of documents. This folder of documents includes the adopted Core Strategy and will include further Development Plan Documents (DPDs), such as this Development Management Development Plan Document (DMDPD) and the Site Allocations DPD. The DMDPD will build on the Core Strategy and will include more detailed local policies for the management of development. It will provide a detailed set of policies, which will be designed to contribute to achieving the LDF’s vision, Core Strategy objectives and its core policies.
  • Llanelli Away Guide

    Llanelli Away Guide

    Harlequins Away:Harlequins 07/04/2009 17:06 Page 1 Harlequins Away:Harlequins 07/04/2009 17:06 Page 2 Introduction What can we say, London needs no introduction. It is one of the world’s greatest cities, there is no shortage of things to see or do, whether you are here just for the game or here to see some of the sights we are sure you will enjoy your stay. Our Top 5 things to do whilst in London. 1. The London Eye www.londoneye.com 2. Tower Bridge www.towerbridge.org.uk 3. Harrods www.harrods.com 4. Twickenham www.twickenhamstadiumtoursguide.co.uk 5. London Dungeons www.thedungeons.com For all London tourist information including maps, hotel and entertainment options please refer to www.visitlondon.com Photo by Inpho Harlequins Away:Harlequins 07/04/2009 17:06 Page 3 Getting there Flying to London? When flying to London there are a number of options, before booking make sure to into account the time and additional cost of trains, as this fixture is being played at the Stoop the closest airports (in order) are Heathrow, Gatwick, City, Luton then Stansted. London Heathrow (LHR) Served by both Aer Lingus and BMI, London Heathrow is connected to central London by the London Underground. All Irish flights arrive in terminal 1, from here collect any bags and make your way by foot to the underground tube station. Other ways to reach central London include a black cab or a fast train service. www.heathrowexpress.co.uk (£32 return) www.heathrowconnect.co.uk (£13.80 return) www.londonheathrowcars.com (quotes available prior to booking) London Gatwick (LGW) Served by Aer Lingus, Ryanair and British Airways, Gatwick is connected to London by both mainline train (from £7 return) and the Gatwick Express (from £29 return) www.gatwickexpress.co.uk London City (LCY) Served by Citijet / Air France this small airport is connected by mainline train that will allow you to connect to the London underground via the Dockland Light railway (DLR).
  • Schedule of Call for Sites All Responses Received

    Schedule of Call for Sites All Responses Received

    Official All responses received to the Call for Sites https://www.richmond.gov.uk/services/planning/planning_policy/local_plan/new_local_plan_direction_of_travel_engagement https://haveyoursay.citizenspace.com/richmondecs/call-20/ Consultation from 24 February until 5 April 2020 Published by LBRuT November 2020 Please note, the responses below are exactly as received from the respondents and have not been edited by the Council. They are not alphabetically ordered or in any other order of priority. The schedule shows where any personal information within responses relating to contact details, particularly full address data, has been removed stating e.g. [personal details removed for data protection] or shown as black rectangles in the appendices. Appendices have been made available separately where due to the length or nature of responses they could not be captured within the main Schedule. The officer references added are shown in the Schedule as [See Appendix….] Respondent Respondent Name / Organisation Name / Organisation reference no. reference no. 2. CBRE on behalf of LGC Teddington 73. Pegasus Group on behalf of Sheen Lane Developments 3. Katie Parsons, Historic England 74. Savills on behalf of Thames Water 8. Sharon Jenkins, Natural England 75 (a) and (b) David Taylor 11. Surrey County Council 76. Henry Clive 13. Heather Archer, Highways England 77 Jennifer Farrell and Batu Lortkipanidze 19. DP9 Ltd on behalf of London Square Developments 78. Graham Green Lucy Wakelin, Transport for London Commercial 79. Max Hampton 21. Development 80. Lira Cabatbat 22. Jimmy Wallace, Richmond Athletic Association 81. Dawn Roads 24. Paul Velluet 82. Campbell Brown 26. Hannah Lukacs 83. Chris O’Rourke Tim Catchpole on behalf of the Mortlake with East 84.
  • Sequential Assessment Department for Education

    Sequential Assessment Department for Education

    SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION/BOWMER AND KIRKLAND LAND OFF HOSPITAL BRIDGE ROAD, TWICKENHAM, RICHMOND -UPON- THAMES LALA ND SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT On behalf of: Department for Education/Bowmer & Kirkland In respect of: Land off Hospital Bridge Road, Twickenham, Richmond-upon-Thames Date: October 2018 Reference: 3157LO Author: PD DPP Planning 66 Porchester Road London W2 6ET Tel: 0207 706 6290 E-mail [email protected] www.dppukltd.com CARDIFF LEEDS LONDON MANCHESTER NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE ESFA/Bowmer & Kirkland Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 4 2.0 QUANTITATIVE NEEDS ANALYSIS ....................................................... 5 3.0 POLICY CONTEXT .............................................................................11 4.0 SEQUENTIAL TEST METHODOLOGY .................................................17 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF SITES .....................................................................22 6.0 LAND OFF HOSPITAL BRIDGE ROAD ................................................55 7.0 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................57 Land at Hospital Bridge Road, Twickenham, Richmond-upon-Thames 3 ESFA/Bowmer & Kirkland 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This Sequential Assessment has been prepared on behalf of the Department for Education (DfE) and Bowmer & Kirkland, in support of a full planning application for a combined 5FE secondary school and sixth form, three court MUGA and associated sports facilities, together with creation of an area of Public Open Space at Land off Hospital Bridge Road, Twickenham, Richmond-upon- Thames (the ‘Site’). Background 1.2 Turing House School is a 5FE 11-18 secondary school and sixth form, which opened in 2015 with a founding year group (Year 7) on a temporary site on Queens Road, Teddington. The school also expanded onto a further temporary site at Clarendon School in Hampton in September 2018, and plans to remain on both of these temporary sites until September 2020.
  • Harlequins-Me-Brochure.Pdf

    Harlequins-Me-Brochure.Pdf

    WELCOME TO THE STOOP Looking for something a little bit different for that business event or private function? The Twickenham Stoop Stadium has been We can offer anything from small meetings, home to Harlequins, the world famous rugby conferences, training courses, summer and club, since 1963. Over the years the stadium Christmas parties to the full hire of the stadium has been redeveloped into a unique and for corporate days. excellent venue for business and events. With close proximity to Central London, the Our flexible approach allows you to either M25, A3, M3 and Heathrow International simply hire the venue and design your own Airport, the Twickenham Stoop is the perfect event, or alternatively, our experienced team venue for business and private events. would be delighted to manage the whole process for you. Whatever the size or nature of your event, here at Harlequins we can tailor any package to meet your individual requirements. 2 HARLEQUIN FC - MEETINGS & EVENTS HARLEQUIN FC - MEETINGS & EVENTS 3 MEMBERS CLUBHOUSE EXECUTIVE BOXES Experience the true rugby heritage of Harlequins with The Twickenham Stoop Stadium is home to 34 executive club memorabilia and historic photographs within the boxes all of which are on the first floor of the Etihad andLV= Members’ Bar, located on the ground floor of the LV= Stand. Stands. Each box has a magnificent view of the pitch and Accommodating up to 220 delegates for a conference and direct access to the stands. The boxes offer a relaxed setting dinner, this room offers natural daylight, plasma screens and perfect for smaller meetings or breakout rooms for larger can be provided with the full range of audio-visual equipment.
  • Lower Thames Fact File

    Lower Thames Fact File

    EA -Tham es LOW Lower Thames Fact File En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y This is one o f a number o f Fact Files which cover all the Rotocking main rivers in the Thames Region of the Environment ihe River Wye Agency. Due to its size and importance the Thames itself is covered by four fact files, dealing with the Upper Thames, from source at Thames Head to Eynsham, the Middle Thames from Eynsham to Hurley, the Lower Thames from Hurley toTeddington, and the Thames Tideway and Estuary extending fromTeddington in West London to Shoebury Ness just east of Southend. Lower Flackwell Heath Thames Marlow Hurle\ enley-on-Thames Maidenhead rgrave Windsor Id Windsor Binfield Burleigh The Bracknell Environment Agency The Environment Agency for smaller units from the Department o f the England and Wales is one o f the Environment. The Environment Agency is most powerful environmental committed to improving wildlife habitats and conserving regulators in the world. We provide the natural environment in all it undertakes. a comprehensive approach to the protection and Our key tool for the integrated management of the local management of the environment, emphasising water, land and air environment is the development of prevention, education and vigorous enforcement Local Environment Agency Plans (LEAPS). The Lower wherever necessary. The Agency’s creation on the 1 st Thames LEAP consultation report contains a April 1996 was a major step, merging the expertise of the comprehensive survey of local natural resources, pressures National Rivers Authority, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of on these resources and the consequent state o f the local Pollution, the Waste Regulation Authorities and several environment.
  • PGB Approved Stage 3 Guidance Appendices

    PGB Approved Stage 3 Guidance Appendices

    Day Date Time Home Away Ground Broadcaster Round 14 Friday 14 August 2020 19:45 Harlequins Sale Sharks Twickenham Stoop BT Sport Saturday 15 August 2020 12:30 Worcester Warriors Gloucester Rugby Sixways Saturday 15 August 2020 14:00 Exeter Chiefs Leicester Tigers Sandy Park BT Sport Saturday 15 August 2020 15:00 Bath Rugby London Irish The Rec Saturday 15 August 2020 16:30 Bristol Bears Saracens Ashton Gate BT Sport Sunday 16 August 2020 15:00 Northampton Saints Wasps Franklin's Gardens BT Sport Round 15 Friday 21 August 2020 18:00 Sale Sharks Exeter Chiefs AJ Bell Stadium BT Sport Friday 21 August 2020 19:45 Gloucester Rugby Bristol Bears Kingsholm Friday 21 August 2020 19:45 Wasps Worcester Warriors Ricoh Arena Saturday 22 August 2020 12:30 Saracens Harlequins Allianz Park Saturday 22 August 2020 14:00 London Irish Northampton Saints Twickenham Stoop BT Sport Saturday 22 August 2020 16:30 Leicester Tigers Bath Rugby Welford Road BT Sport Round 16 Tuesday 25 August 2020 17:30 Wasps Sale Sharks Ricoh Arena BT Sport Tuesday 25 August 2020 19:45 Bristol Bears Exeter Chiefs Ashton Gate BT Sport Wednesday 26 August 2020 18:00 Leicester Tigers London Irish Welford Road Wednesday 26 August 2020 18:00 Saracens Gloucester Rugby Allianz Park Wednesday 26 August 2020 18:00 Worcester Warriors Harlequins Sixways Wednesday 26 August 2020 19:45 Northampton Saints Bath Rugby Franklin's Gardens BT Sport Round 17 Saturday 29 August 2020 15:00 Sale Sharks Bristol Bears AJ Bell Stadium BT Sport Sunday 30 August 2020 14:00 Harlequins Northampton Saints Twickenham
  • Hampton Water Treatment Works

    Hampton Water Treatment Works

    Hampton Water Treatment Works Environmental Permit Application, Tranche A Specified Generator Controls, Non -Technical Summary ________________________________ ___________________ Report for Thames Water Utilities Ltd ED12448 ED 12448 – Hampton - NTS Report | Issue 2.0 | Date 09/09/2019 Ricardo Energy & Environment Hampton Water Treatment Works | i Customer: Contact: Thames Water Utilities Ltd Andy Collins Ricardo Energy & Environment Customer reference: FA1300/Lot 3/4700328190 Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, United Kingdom ED11941 Confidentiality, copyright & reproduction: t: +44 (0) 1235 75 3044 e: [email protected] This report is the Copyright of Ricardo Energy & Environment, a trading name of Ricardo-AEA Ltd and has been prepared by Ricardo Energy & Ricardo is certificated to ISO9001, ISO14001 Environment under contract to Thames Water and OHSAS18001 Utilities Ltd for “Permitting application delivery for Medium Combustion Plant (MCP) and Specified Author: Generators (SGs) – Specification 2” of 15/05/19. Lucinda Hall, Andy Collins The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any Approved By: organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of the Commercial Manager at Andy Collins Ricardo Energy & Environment. Ricardo Energy & Environment accepts no liability whatsoever to Date: any third party for any loss or damage arising from any interpretation or use of the information 09 September 2019 contained in this report, or reliance on any views expressed therein, other than the liability that is Ricardo Energy & Environment reference: agreed in the said contract. Ref: ED12448 – Hampton - NTS Report Issue 2.0 Ricardo in Confidence Ref: Ricardo/ED12448 – Hampton - NTS Report/Issue 2.0 Ricardo Energy & Environment Hampton Water Treatment Works | ii Table of contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................
  • Twickenham Stadium Technical Briefing Note

    Twickenham Stadium Technical Briefing Note

    Technical briefing note – Off-site hospitality locations (OLOs) 72 Welbeck Street London W1G 0AY Twickenham Stadium Tel. 020 7493 3338 Fax. 020 7491 1825 www.geraldeve.com Executive Summary 1 We have reviewed the planning history for the Off-site Licenced Operator (OLO) sites at Chase Bridge, Kneller Hall, Access Self Storage, Richmond College, All Hallows Church, Twickenham Stoop, Cardinal Vaughn playing fields, as well as the planning history for the North Car Park. 2 Planning permission exists for off-site hospitality on RFU match days at five sites. 3 Of these, two (Richmond upon Thames College and Access Self Storage) have time limited permissions, the permitted uses will end by March 2020. 4 Three (Kneller Hall, Chase Bridge school and Twickenham Stoop) have permanent planning permission for hospitality on a set number of days. 5 No planning permission has been found for the use of Cardinal Vaughan playing fields except for the temporary permission for Rugby World Cup use. 6 The position is summarised in Table 1, below. 7 Off-site corporate hospitality is highly unlikely to continue on the three sites with permanent permission, following the completion of the East Stand. This is because: 1. the RFU will no longer provide corporate hospitality tickets to the third party operators, preventing them from assembling corporate hospitality packages. Erecting marquees, etc., for corporate hospitality will not be viable if premium rates cannot be charged because a match ticket is not included in the package; 2. any alternative hospitality offer would not be licenced by the RFU and, as such, is unlikely to be attractive to corporate clients in any case; 3.
  • Harlequins Rugby 2011 - 2012 Cheat Sheet by Dave Child (Davechild) Via Cheatography.Com/1/Cs/154

    Harlequins Rugby 2011 - 2012 Cheat Sheet by Dave Child (Davechild) Via Cheatography.Com/1/Cs/154

    Harlequins Rugby 2011 - 2012 Cheat Sheet by Dave Child (DaveChild) via cheatography.com/1/cs/154/ Harlequins Logo Harlequins Results 2011 - 2012 Harlequins Results 2011 - 2012 (cont) Date Result Team 10 Jun 17-16 England U20s1 v 9 Aug 28-40 v Racing Métro 924 15 Jun 42-15 England U20s1 v 16 Aug 40-15 v London Scottis​ h4 20 Jun 21-20 England U20s1 v 4 24 Aug 19-16 v Glasgow Warrior​ s 1 A​ viva Premier​ ship, 2 A​ -Le​ ague, 3 LV= 9 Sep 51-17 v London Irish2 Cup, 4 F​ rie​ ndly, 5 H​ ein​ eken Cup 16 Sep 22-31 v Bath United2 Harlequins Fixtures 2011 - 2012 30 Sep 25-25 Saracens Storm2 v Date Team 7 Oct 23-34 Exeter Braves2 v 7:45 31 ​ Oct England Legends4 v 12 Oct 26-33 v Scarlet​ s5 7:00 13 ​ Nov England Women4 v 20 Oct 23-16 ASM Clermont Auverg‐​ ​ 4 ne5 v 7:45 21 Feb England Legends v Harlequins Overview 1 2 3 28 Oct 15-42 London Wasps2 v A​ viva Premier​ ship, A​ -Le​ ague, LV= Founded 1866 Cup, 4 F​ rie​ ndly, 5 H​ ein​ eken Cup 9 Nov 19-5 Exeter Chiefs3 v Ground Twickenham Stoop 15 Nov 26-31 v Sale Sharks3 England Rugby Union Premier​ ship Ground Capacity 14,816 25 Nov 39-30 Northam​ pton Wander‐​ Pos Team P/W/D​ /L Pts Chairman David Morgan ers2 v ​ CEO David Ellis 1 Northampton 17/13/1/3 62 7 Dec 8-32 Racing Métro 925 v Saints Director of Rugby Conor O'Shea 15 Dec 17-3 v Racing Métro 925 2 Exeter Chiefs 17/11/0/6 53 Coach John Kingston 11 Jan 13-16 v ASM Clermont 3 Saracens 17/11/1/5 52 Captain Chris Robshaw Auvergn​ e5 4 Bath Rugby 17/11/0/6 51 19 Jan 20-22 Scarlet​ s5 v Harlequins History 5 Leicester Tigers 17/11/1/5 51 25 Jan
  • Richmond Upon Thames Lies 15 Miles Anniversary

    Richmond Upon Thames Lies 15 Miles Anniversary

    www.visitrichmond.co.uk 2010 - 04 historic gems 2010 - 06 riverside retreat RICHMOND - 2010 08 breath of fresh air 2010 - 10 museums and galleries UPON 2010 - 12 eating out 2010 - 14 shopping 2010 - 16 history, ghosts and hauntings THAMES 2010 - 18 attractions 2010 - 26 map VisitRichmond Guide 2010 2010 - 30 richmond hill 2010 - 31 restaurants and bars 2010 - 36 accommodation 2010 - 46 venues 2010 - 50 travel information rrichmondichmond gguideuide 20102010 1 88/12/09/12/09 221:58:551:58:55 Full page advert ---- 2 - visitrichmond.co.uk rrichmondichmond gguideuide 20102010 2 88/12/09/12/09 221:59:221:59:22 Hampton Court Garden Welcome to Cllr Serge Lourie London’s Arcadia Richmond upon Thames lies 15 miles anniversary. The London Wetland Centre southwest of central London yet a fast in Barnes is an oasis of peace and a haven train form Waterloo Station will take you for wildlife close to the heart of the capital here in 15 minutes. When you arrive you while Twickenham Stadium the home of will emerge into a different world. England Rugby has a fantastic visitors centre which is open all year round. Defi ned by the Thames with over 16 miles of riverside we are without doubt the most I am extremely honoured to be Leader beautiful of the capitals 32 boroughs. It is of this beautiful borough. Our aim at the with good reason that we are known as Town Hall is to preserve and improve it for London’s Arcadia. everyone. Top of our agenda is protecting the environment and improving Richmond We really have something for everyone.