From Stride Toward Freedom Necessary to Protect Ourselves

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Stride Toward Freedom Necessary to Protect Ourselves Civil Rights and Protest Literature from Stride Toward Freedom RI 2 Determine two or more Nonfiction by Martin Luther King Jr. central ideas of a text and analyze their development over For a biography of Martin Luther King Jr., see page 1202. the course of the text, including how they interact and build on one another to provide a Necessary to Protect Ourselves complex analysis. RI 5 Analyze Interview with Malcolm X by Les Crane and evaluate the effectiveness of the structure an author uses in his or her argument, including whether the structure makes Meet the Author points clear, convincing, and engaging. RI 6 Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text in which the rhetoric is Malcolm X 1925–1965 particularly effective, analyzing how style and content contribute In 1944, while Martin Luther King Jr. people “a race of devils” and promoted a to the power, persuasiveness, or beauty of the text. was attending college classes in Atlanta, vision of black pride. They advocated a 19-year-old Malcolm Little was hustling on radical solution to the race problem: the the streets of Harlem. By 1952, a jailhouse establishment of a separate, self-reliant conversion transformed Little into the black nation. political firebrand we know as Malcolm Change of Heart Inspired by the Black X, whose separatist views posed a serious Muslim vision, Malcolm Little converted challenge to King’s integrationist vision. to Islam and changed his last name to Bitter Legacy Where King grew up X, symbolizing his lost African name. comfortably middle-class, Little’s childhood Once released from prison, he became an was scarred by poverty and racial violence. influential spokesman for the Nation of His outspoken father, Earl Little, was an Islam and was named their first national early advocate of black separatism who minister. Over time, however, he became was murdered by white supremacists. His critical of the organization. In 1964, mother, left alone to raise eight children in Malcolm X experienced a second spiritual dire poverty, suffered a mental breakdown. conversion while making a pilgrimage to Her children, including Malcolm, were sent Mecca. The sight of Muslims of many to separate foster homes. races worshipping together caused him to renounce all forms of racial hatred. By the time he was sent to prison On his return home, Malcolm X broke in 1946, Little had been brutally with the Nation of Islam and formed the didisillusionedsillusioned aboutabout hishis Organization of Afro-American Unity, prprospectsospects in wwhite-hite dedicated to promoting unity among dominateddominated society.soci black people all over the world. WhileWhile readingreading in thethe prison library,lib Marked Man This new direction angered hehe discovereddiscovere the many Black Muslims, including the young teachingsteachings ofof a Louis Farrakhan, who labeled Malcolm X a smallsmall religiousreligio sect traitor. In February 1965, as Malcolm X was calledcalled thethe NationN speaking to a crowd of 400 in Harlem, he of Islam,Islam, or the was gunned down by three assassins, two of BlackBlack Muslims,Muslim whom were Black Muslims. whowho calledcalled whitewh Author Online Go to thinkcentral.com. KEYWORD: HML11-1218 1218 NA_L11PE-u06s32-brStride-1.indd 1218 11/30/10 10:08:49 AM text analysis: analyze genres The works you are about to read are two different types of writing, or genres. You will read part of an autobiography by Martin Luther King Jr., and an interview with Malcolm X. How do we fight An autobiography is the story of a person’s life written by that person. Autobiographies include important events from injustice? the person’s life, as well as reflections on personal beliefs. Most people would agree that it’s An interview is a conversation conducted by a reporter in important to stand up for your rights if which responses are elicited from another person, recorded, you’re being treated unfairly. However, then broadcast or published. In written format, interviews there are many different opinions about include questions by the reporter and answers by the person the best way to fight back against being interviewed. As you read, look for the distinguishing injustice. In this lesson, Martin Luther characteristics of each genre. King Jr. and Malcolm X argue two very different perspectives on this issue. reading skill: synthesizing sources Traditionally they were on opposite When you compare two or more sources, it is important to sides of the debate about using violence synthesize, or to bring together, the main ideas and supporting as an appropriate political tool. details from each text. Follow these steps for synthesizing: PRESENT What considerations do you • Find the main idea in each work. think are important when choosing • Look for details that support the main ideas. how to respond to injustice? Working • Compare and contrast the information in the sources to find in a small group, make a list of relevant similarities and differences. concerns, such as obeying the law or • Put it all together by recording your findings. achieving quick results. Then, rank them in order of importance. Share As you read, fill out a chart like the one below. Then, using your your opinions with the class. chart, synthesize the information and compare the two texts. Main Ideas Supporting Details King Malcolm X vocabulary in context King and Malcolm X use the boldfaced words to express their opposing views. Restate each phrase, using a different word or words for the boldfaced term. 1. need to repudiate those who oppress us 2. by not speaking out, tacitly accepting bad situations 3. cannot succumb to defeatist attitudes 4. realize that prejudice is applied indiscriminately 5. success through a synthesis of ideas and approaches 6. rioting and anarchy in the streets Complete the activities in your Reader/Writer Notebook. 1219 NA_L11PE-u06s32-brStride-1.indd 1219 12/15/10 6:10:59 PM stride toward freedom Martin Luther King Jr. background In the 1950s, the civil rights movement focused its efforts on overturning Analyze Visuals the so-called Jim Crow laws, the segregation laws that kept African Americans from equal What does this photo participation in public life. In 1954, the Supreme Court issued its decision in the landmark reveal about the risks case Brown v. Board of Education. In this decision, the court declared that “separate but of nonviolent protest? equal” education, a central provision of segregationist policy, was inherently discriminatory. Buoyed by this win, civil rights activists began to challenge Jim Crow through other forms of peaceful protest, such as the year-long mass boycott of segregated buses in Montgomery, Alabama, beginning in 1955. In Stride Toward Freedom, published in 1958, a confident and optimistic King describes the philosophy behind the successful boycott. Oppressed people deal with their oppression in three characteristic ways. One way is acquiescence: the oppressed resign themselves to their doom. They tacitly tacitly (tBsPGt-lC) adj. adjust themselves to oppression, and thereby become conditioned to it. In every silently movement toward freedom some of the oppressed prefer to remain oppressed. Almost 2,800 years ago Moses set out to lead the children of Israel from the slavery of Egypt to the freedom of the promised land.1 He soon discovered that a SYNTHESIZE slaves do not always welcome their deliverers. They become accustomed to being RESOURCES slaves. They would rather bear those ills they have, as Shakespeare pointed out, Reread lines 1–10. What 2 3 than flee to others that they know not of. They prefer the “fleshpots of Egypt” does this paragraph tell 10 to the ordeals of emancipation. a you about the main idea? 1. promised land: the land of Canaan, promised by God in the Bible (Genesis 12:1–3, 7) to Abraham’s descendants. 2. bear those ills . know not of: an allusion to a line in Act 3, Scene 1, of Hamlet by William Shakespeare. Civil rights protestors being 3. prefer the “fleshpots of Egypt”: an allusion to a line in the book of Exodus in the Bible. As Moses was sprayed with high-pressure leading the Israelites out of Egypt, some of them grumbled and wished they had stayed there. hoses 1220 unit 6: contemporary literature NA_L11PE-u06s32-Stride.indd 1220 11/30/10 10:10:00 AM NA_L11PE-u06s32-Stride.indd 1221 11/30/10 10:10:18 AM There is such a thing as the freedom of exhaustion. Some people are so worn Language Coach down by the yoke of oppression that they give up. A few years ago in the slum Word Definitions areas of Atlanta, a Negro guitarist used to sing almost daily: “Been down so long Engulfs (line 15) means that down don’t bother me.” This is the type of negative freedom and resignation “flow over and swallow up” or “overwhelm.” that often engulfs the life of the oppressed. (Imagine water But this is not the way out. To accept passively an unjust system is to overflowing an island.) cooperate with that system; thereby the oppressed become as evil as the oppressor. What does King say can Noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with overwhelm a person good. The oppressed must never allow the conscience of the oppressor to slumber. who is exhausted from oppression? 20 Religion reminds every man that he is his brother’s keeper.4 To accept injustice or segregation passively is to say to the oppressor that his actions are morally right. It is a way of allowing his conscience to fall asleep. At this moment the oppressed fails to be his brother’s keeper. So acquiescence—while often the easier way—is not the moral way.
Recommended publications
  • Viewer's Guide
    SELMA T H E BRIDGE T O T H E BALLOT TEACHING TOLERANCE A PROJECT OF THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER VIEWER’S GUIDE GRADES 6-12 Selma: The Bridge to the Ballot is the story of a courageous group of Alabama students and teachers who, along with other activists, fought a nonviolent battle to win voting rights for African Americans in the South. Standing in their way: a century of Jim Crow, a resistant and segregationist state, and a federal govern- ment slow to fully embrace equality. By organizing and marching bravely in the face of intimidation, violence, arrest and even murder, these change-makers achieved one of the most significant victories of the civil rights era. The 40-minute film is recommended for students in grades 6 to 12. The Viewer’s Guide supports classroom viewing of Selma with background information, discussion questions and lessons. In Do Something!, a culminating activity, students are encouraged to get involved locally to promote voting and voter registration. For more information and updates, visit tolerance.org/selma-bridge-to-ballot. Send feedback and ideas to [email protected]. Contents How to Use This Guide 4 Part One About the Film and the Selma-to-Montgomery March 6 Part Two Preparing to Teach with Selma: The Bridge to the Ballot 16 Part Three Before Viewing 18 Part Four During Viewing 22 Part Five After Viewing 32 Part Six Do Something! 37 Part Seven Additional Resources 41 Part Eight Answer Keys 45 Acknowledgements 57 teaching tolerance tolerance.org How to Use This Guide Selma: The Bridge to the Ballot is a versatile film that can be used in a variety of courses to spark conversations about civil rights, activism, the proper use of government power and the role of the citizen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Montgomery Bus Boycott
    CASE STUDY The Montgomery Bus Boycott What objectives, targets, strategies, demands, and rhetoric should a nascent social movement choose as it confronts an entrenched system of white supremacy? How should it make decisions? Peter Levine December 2020 SNF Agora Case Studies The SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University offers a series of case studies that show how civic and political actors navigated real-life challenges related to democracy. Practitioners, teachers, organizational leaders, and trainers working with civic and political leaders, students, and trainees can use our case studies to deepen their skills, to develop insights about how to approach strategic choices and dilemmas, and to get to know each other better and work more effectively. How to Use the Case Unlike many case studies, ours do not focus on individual leaders or other decision-makers. Instead, the SNF Agora Case Studies are about choices that groups make collectively. Therefore, these cases work well as prompts for group discussions. The basic question in each case is: “What would we do?” After reading a case, some groups role-play the people who were actually involved in the situation, treating the discussion as a simulation. In other groups, the participants speak as themselves, dis- cussing the strategies that they would advocate for the group described in the case. The person who assigns or organizes your discussion may want you to use the case in one of those ways. When studying and discussing the choices made by real-life activists (often under intense pres- sure), it is appropriate to exhibit some humility. You do not know as much about their communities and circumstances as they did, and you do not face the same risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the Modern Civil Rights Movement
    Women in the Modern Civil Rights Movement Introduction Research Questions Who comes to mind when considering the Modern Civil Rights Movement (MCRM) during 1954 - 1965? Is it one of the big three personalities: Martin Luther to Consider King Jr., Malcolm X, or Rosa Parks? Or perhaps it is John Lewis, Stokely Who were some of the women Carmichael, James Baldwin, Thurgood Marshall, Ralph Abernathy, or Medgar leaders of the Modern Civil Evers. What about the names of Septima Poinsette Clark, Ella Baker, Diane Rights Movement in your local town, city or state? Nash, Daisy Bates, Fannie Lou Hamer, Ruby Bridges, or Claudette Colvin? What makes the two groups different? Why might the first group be more familiar than What were the expected gender the latter? A brief look at one of the most visible events during the MCRM, the roles in 1950s - 1960s America? March on Washington, can help shed light on this question. Did these roles vary in different racial and ethnic communities? How would these gender roles On August 28, 1963, over 250,000 men, women, and children of various classes, effect the MCRM? ethnicities, backgrounds, and religions beliefs journeyed to Washington D.C. to march for civil rights. The goals of the March included a push for a Who were the "Big Six" of the comprehensive civil rights bill, ending segregation in public schools, protecting MCRM? What were their voting rights, and protecting employment discrimination. The March produced one individual views toward women of the most iconic speeches of the MCRM, Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a in the movement? Dream" speech, and helped paved the way for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and How were the ideas of gender the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaders of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom Biographical Information
    “The Top Ten” Leaders of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom Biographical Information (Asa) Philip Randolph • Director of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. • He was born on April 15, 1889 in Crescent City, Florida. He was 74 years old at the time of the March. • As a young boy, he would recite sermons, imitating his father who was a minister. He was the valedictorian, the student with the highest rank, who spoke at his high school graduation. • He grew up during a time of intense violence and injustice against African Americans. • As a young man, he organized workers so that they could be treated more fairly, receiving better wages and better working conditions. He believed that black and white working people should join together to fight for better jobs and pay. • With his friend, Chandler Owen, he created The Messenger, a magazine for the black community. The articles expressed strong opinions, such as African Americans should not go to war if they have to be segregated in the military. • Randolph was asked to organize black workers for the Pullman Company, a railway company. He became head of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, the first black labor union. Labor unions are organizations that fight for workers’ rights. Sleeping car porters were people who served food on trains, prepared beds, and attended train passengers. • He planned a large demonstration in 1941 that would bring 10,000 African Americans to the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC to try to get better jobs and pay. The plan convinced President Roosevelt to take action.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther King, Jr. Teacher's Resource Manual. INSTITUTION Connecticut State Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 298 063 SO 019 299 TITLE Martin Luther King, Jr. Teacher's Resource Manual. INSTITUTION Connecticut State Dept. of Education, Hartford. PUB DATE 88 NOTE 67p. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS )(Black Leadership; )(Civil Liberties; )(Civil Rights; Elementary Secondary Education; Instructional Materials; Resource Materials; Resource Units; Social Studies; Speeches; State Curriculum Guides; Units of Study IDENTIFIERS )(King (Martin Luther Jr) ABSTRACT This Connecticut teachers' manual on Martin Luther King, Jr. includes: (1) teacher background information; (2) five excerpts from King's speeches; (3) four themes for lesson plans; and (4) sample lesson plans. The teacher's background information provides biographical sketches of King and his precursors. The five speeches reproduced here are "I've Been to the Mountaintop" (1968), "I Have a Dream" (1963), "Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech" (1964), "The Drum Major Instinct" (1968), and "Letter from Birmingham Jail" (1963). There are four lesson plan themes on equality, freedom and justice, peace, and civic participation. Each lesson plan is presented at the elementary, intermediate, and secondary level and includes an introduction, objectives, materials needed, procedure for presentation, and suggested addi*ional activities. This manual also contains a timeline on King and the modern civil rights movement, a play entitled "The Decision: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr." by Cynthia Mathews, and a 19-item resource
    [Show full text]
  • MARTIN LUTHER KING and the PHILOSOPHY of NONVIOLENCE Wikimedia Commons Wikimedia
    Bill of Rights Constitutional Rights in Action Foundation SUMMER 2017 Volume 32 No4 MARTIN LUTHER KING AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF NONVIOLENCE Wikimedia Commons Wikimedia Martin Luther King, Jr. addressing the crowd of about 250,000 people at the March on Washington in August 1963. Martin Luther King, Jr. is remembered for his achievements The man, who turned out to be an American Nazi Party in civil rights and for the methods he used to get there — member, continued to flail. namely, nonviolence. More than just a catchphrase, more than just the “absence of violence,” and more than just a tactic, The integrated audience at first thought the whole nonviolence was a philosophy that King honed over the thing was staged, a mock demonstration of King’s non- course of his adult life. It has had a profound, lasting influ- violent philosophy in action. But as King reeled, and real ence on social justice movements at home and abroad. blood spurted from his face, they began to realize it was In September 1962, King convened a meeting of the no act. Finally, several SCLC members rushed the stage Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), the to stop the attack. main organizational force behind his civil rights activism, But they stopped short when King shouted, “Don’t in Birmingham, Alabama. King was giving a talk on the touch him! Don’t touch him! We have to pray for him.” need for nonviolent action in the face of violent white The SCLC men pulled the Nazi off King, who was beaten racism when a white man jumped on stage and, without so badly he couldn’t continue the speech.
    [Show full text]
  • African-Americans, American Jews, and the Church-State Relationship
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 43 Issue 1 Fall 1993 Article 4 1993 Ironic Encounter: African-Americans, American Jews, and the Church-State Relationship Dena S. Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Dena S. Davis, Ironic Encounter: African-Americans, American Jews, and the Church-State Relationship, 43 Cath. U. L. Rev. 109 (1994). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol43/iss1/4 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IRONIC ENCOUNTER: AFRICAN-AMERICANS, AMERICAN JEWS, AND THE CHURCH- STATE RELATIONSHIP Dena S. Davis* I. INTRODUCTION This Essay examines a paradox in contemporary American society. Jewish voters are overwhelmingly liberal and much more likely than non- Jewish white voters to support an African-American candidate., Jewish voters also staunchly support the greatest possible separation of church * Assistant Professor, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. For critical readings of earlier drafts of this Essay, the author is indebted to Erwin Chemerinsky, Stephen W. Gard, Roger D. Hatch, Stephan Landsman, and Peter Paris. For assistance with resources, the author obtained invaluable help from Michelle Ainish at the Blaustein Library of the American Jewish Committee, Joyce Baugh, Steven Cohen, Roger D. Hatch, and especially her research assistant, Christopher Janezic. This work was supported by a grant from the Cleveland-Marshall Fund. 1. In the 1982 California gubernatorial election, Jewish voters gave the African- American candidate, Tom Bradley, 75% of their vote; Jews were second only to African- Americans in their support for Bradley, exceeding even Hispanics, while the majority of the white vote went for the white Republican candidate, George Deukmejian.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther King Jr
    Martin Luther King Jr. Martin Luther King Jr. (born Michael King Jr.; January 15, 1929 – April 4, 1968) was an American Baptist minister and activist who The Reverend became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the American civil rights movement from 1955 until his assassination in 1968. King Martin Luther King Jr. advanced civil rights through nonviolence and civil disobedience, inspired by his Christian beliefs and the nonviolent activism of Mahatma Gandhi. He was the son of early civil rights activist Martin Luther King Sr. King participated in and led marches for blacks' right to vote, desegregation, labor rights, and other basic civil rights.[1] King led the 1955 Montgomery bus boycott and later became the first president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). As president of the SCLC, he led the unsuccessful Albany Movement in Albany, Georgia, and helped organize some of the nonviolent 1963 protests in Birmingham, Alabama. King helped organize the 1963 March on Washington, where he delivered his famous "I Have a Dream" speech on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. The SCLC put into practice the tactics of nonviolent protest with some success by strategically choosing the methods and places in which protests were carried out. There were several dramatic stand-offs with segregationist authorities, who sometimes turned violent.[2] FBI King in 1964 Director J. Edgar Hoover considered King a radical and made him an 1st President of the Southern Christian object of the FBI's COINTELPRO from 1963, forward. FBI agents investigated him for possible communist ties, recorded his extramarital Leadership Conference affairs and reported on them to government officials, and, in 1964, In office mailed King a threatening anonymous letter, which he interpreted as an attempt to make him commit suicide.[3] January 10, 1957 – April 4, 1968 On October 14, 1964, King won the Nobel Peace Prize for combating Preceded by Position established racial inequality through nonviolent resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther King Jr.'S Troubled Attitude Toward Nonviolent Resistance
    LISA WANG Martin Luther King Jr.’s Troubled Attitude toward Nonviolent Resistance Comment: “What’s at Stake” as a Counterargument HEN IT COMES TO THE IMAGE OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, W Jr., there would seem to be little to debate: he was an The author is making an unorthodox argument about King that challenges our popular image idealistic martyr for civil rights, a man who pressed for his of this iconic leader. Note that she begins her “Dream” through doctrines of nonviolent resistance, patience essay with a brief summary of that image – and redemption. In a certain sense, he is a model of what can the counterargument to her central claim – but then immediately turns to present her only be described as superhuman restraint, godly wisdom and own contrasting interpretation. This type of infinite love, and it was these characteristics that positioned King opening structure enables her to highlight what is at stake in her essay from the start by to lead a successful civil rights movement that transformed the establishing that her interpretation of King basic social and legal framework of the United States. But this rejects the more common view. It lets the image of King persists despite a critical fact we have yet to reader know that her essay will make a bold intellectual intervention. address fully: in his later writings, King began to question his emphasis on patience, redemption and brotherly love. Where he Why else do you think the author opens her 1 professed in 1958 a “deep faith in the future” and the essay in this manner? How does this type of opening reach out to her audience? 1 Lisa Wang 2 “democratic ideal of freedom and equality … for all,” a decade later he was conceding that his staunch belief in nonviolent resistance needed a different reckoning.
    [Show full text]
  • JEWS and the CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT
    ENTREE: A PICTURE WORTH A THOUSAND NARRATIVES JEWS and the FRAMING A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it’s often never quite as CIVIL RIGHTS simple as it seems. Begin by viewing the photo below and discussing some of the questions that follow. We recommend sharing more MOVEMENT background on the photo after an initial discussion. APPETIZER: RACIAL JUSTICE JOURNEY INSTRUCTIONS Begin by reflecting on the following two questions. When and how did you first become aware of race? Think about your family, where you lived growing up, who your friends were, your viewing of media, or different models of leadership. Where are you coming from in your racial justice journey? Please share one or two brief experiences. Photo Courtesy: Associated Press Once you’ve had a moment to reflect, share your thoughts around the table with the other guests. GUIDING QUESTIONS 1. What and whom do you see in this photograph? Whom do you recognize, if anyone? 2. If you’ve seen this photograph before, where and when have you seen it? What was your reaction to it? 3. What feelings does this photograph evoke for you? 01 JEWS and the CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT BACKGROUND ON THE PHOTO INSTRUCTIONS This photograph was taken on March 21, 1965 as the Read the following texts that challenge and complicate the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. marched with others from photograph and these narratives. Afterwards, find a chevruta (a Selma to Montgomery, Alabama in support of voting partner) and select several of the texts to think about together.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 John Lewis: a Conversation – Marching for Freedom
    1 JOHN LEWIS: A CONVERSATION – MARCHING FOR FREEDOM CLOSED CAPTIONING SCRIPT Hoffman: Congressman John Lewis, I am so glad you’re here for this conversation. I’ve looked so forward to meeting you and --again I appreciate your time. Lewis: Well, I’m delighted and very pleased to be here. Susan, thank you for having me here. Hoffman: Over the next half hour my goal is to cover your pivotal role in the Civil Right Movement. I’d like you to begin with me here. In 1963, when you were 23, you were listed as one of the six primary leaders in the Civil Rights Movement. And I wonder, did you feel at 23 that you were ready for that awesome responsibility. Lewis: Well, at the age of 23, I had grown up a little. You must understand that I grew up in rural Alabama, fifty miles from Montgomery, and I came under the influence of Martin Luther King, Jr. I heard Dr. King’s voice. I heard his words on an old radio. I’d heard about Rosa Parks and T Montgomery Bus Boycott. I’d seen segregation. I’d seen racial discrimination. Hoffman: Describe those early signs that you remember as a young boy. Lewis: Well I saw the signs that said “White Men,” “Colored Men,” “White Women,” “Colored Women,” “White Waiting,” “Colored Waiting.” I didn’t like it. As a child, I would ask my mother, my father, my grandparents, my great-grandparents, “Why segregation? Why racial discrimination?” And they would say, “That’s the way it is.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights Movement
    Civil Rights Movement From the beginning, race has been at the heart of the deepest divisions in the United States and the greatest challenges to its democratic vision. Africans were brought to the continent in slavery, American Indian nations were subjected to genocidal wars of conquest, northwestern Mexico was invaded and annexed, Asians were imported as laborers then subjected to exclusionary laws. Black historian W.E.B. DuBois wrote that the history of the 20th Century would be the history of the color line, predicting that anti- colonial movements in Africa and Asia would parallel movements for full civil and political rights for people of color in the United States. During the 1920s and 1930s social scientists worked to replace the predominant biological paradigm of European racial superiority (common in Social Darwinism and eugenics) with the notion of ethnicity -- which suggested that racial minorities could follow the path of white European immigrant groups, assimilating into the American mainstream. Gunnar Myrdal's massive study An American Dilemma in 1944 made the case that the American creed of democracy, equality and justice must be extended to include blacks. Nathan Glazer and Daniel Moynihan argued in Beyond the Melting Pot in 1963 for a variation of assimilation based on cultural pluralism, in which various racial and ethnic groups retained some dimension of distinct identity. Following the civil rights movement's victories, neoconservatives began to argue in the 1970s that equal opportunity for individuals should not be interpreted as group rights to be achieved through affirmative action in the sense of preferences or quotas.
    [Show full text]