Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Mammalian sterile 20–like kinase 1 (Mst1) suppresses lymphoma
development by promoting faithful chromosome segregation
Tae-Shin Kim1, Da-Hye Lee1, Sang Kyum Kim1, So Youn Shin2, Eul-Ju Seo2, and Dae-Sik
Lim1
1National Creative Research Initiatives Center, Graduate School of Nanoscience and
Technology (WCU), Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of
Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-701, Korea
2Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan
Medical Center, Seoul 138-736, Korea
Running title: Mst1 suppresses CIN and lymphomagenesis
Key words: Mst1, Hippo, lymphoma, p53, chromosomal instability
Financial support: The National Creative Research Initiatives Program (20120001228)
Corresponding author: Dae-Sik Lim, Department of Biological Sciences, KAIST, 291
Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea
Tel.: +82-42-350-2635. Fax: +82-42-350-2610. E-mail: [email protected]
Word count: 4778 words
Total number of figures and tables: 6 figures and 0 tables
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interests: No potential conflicts of interests were disclosed.
1
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Abstract
The mammalian Hippo signaling pathway has been implicated in oncogenesis in the context
of solid tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma. MST1 kinase, the core component of the
Hippo signaling pathway, is highly expressed in hematopoietic cells. However, its possible
impact on tumorigenesis in this setting is unknown. In this study, we provide evidence that
Mst1 loss in the mouse enhances chemically and genetically induced lymphoma development
by inducing chromosomal instability. Mst1 deficiency increased susceptibility to T-cell acute
lymphoblastic leukemia induced by mutagen exposure. Notably, before transformation Mst1-
/- normal thymocytes showed no changes in proliferation or apoptosis in vitro and in vivo, but
they displayed elevated levels of abnormal mitotic chromosomes and aneuploidy, conditions
known to promote tumorigenesis. Mst1-/- mice also showed accelerated formation of
spontaneous lymphomas in a p53 deficient background, accompanied by severe aneuploidy.
In clinical specimens of lymphoma and leukemia, we documented frequent downregulation
of MST1 expression, consistent with our findings. Taken together, our findings reveal a
tumor suppressive function of Mst1 based on its ability to prevent chromosomal instability in
lymphocytes.
Introduction
Mst1 (also known as Stk4) is a serine/threonine kinase that belongs to the mammalian-Ste20-
kinase family (1). Most previous studies have focused on the apoptosis-related functions of
Mst1. During apoptosis, Mst1 is cleaved by activated caspase 3 to yield a catalytically active
N-terminal peptide. This cleaved N-terminal kinase domain mediates chromatin condensation
by phosphorylating histone H2B. Furthermore, overexpression of either Mst1 or its closest
homolog, Mst2, induces apoptosis in many cancer cell lines. The mitogen-activated protein
2
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
kinases (MAPKs), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38, are known to be downstream
effectors of activated Mst1 during apoptosis [reviewed in (2, 3)]. More recently, several
reports have revealed other roles of Mst1 that are unrelated to cell death. For example, Mst1
is activated during mitosis and regulates cell-cycle progression via phosphorylation of
MOBKL1A and MOBKL1B (4). Interestingly, Mst1 is also involved in regulating
intracellular vesicle trafficking of integrin beta 2 (Itbg2/LFA-1) in the context of T cell
activation (5).
Genetic screening studies in Drosophila have defined the Hippo signaling pathway,
showing that this pathway is an important developmental program that controls proliferation
and apoptosis for proper organ development (6, 7). According to the current model, Hippo,
the Drosophila homolog of Mst1/2, phosphorylates and thereby activates the Warts kinase
(Lats1/2 in mammals) with the help of Salvador (Sav1 in mammals). Warts activity is further
enhanced by binding to Mats (Mob1 in mammals), another substrate of Hippo. Activated
Warts, in turn, phosphorylates and inactivates the transcriptional co-activator Yorkie (Yap1 in
mammals) (8). Importantly, Drosophila mutants for hippo, salvador, or warts show a severe
overgrowth phenotype in mutant tissues. By extension, the mammalian Hippo pathway likely
represents a new tumor-suppressor pathway (6, 7).
Consistent with this assumption, genetically engineered mouse models of mammalian
Hippo pathway components frequently develop spontaneous tumors (9-16). Of note, liver-
specific Mst1/2- or Sav1-knockout mice eventually develop liver cancers accompanied by
Yap1 upregulation (12-15); and Yap1-overexpressing transgenic mice show enlarged livers
and ultimately succumb to liver cancer (16). These observations clearly demonstrate that the
mammalian Hippo pathway has a crucial role in preventing tumorigenesis though inactivation
of Yap1. However, whether Mst1 has tumor-suppressive functions in organs other than the
3
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
liver and intestine, and whether Mst1 can function as a tumor suppressor independently of the
canonical Hippo signaling pathway (i.e., inactivation of Yap1) remains to be answered.
Chromosomal instability is a phenomenon in which whole chromosomes are mis-
segregated during mitosis. Chromosomal instability, as well as its consequence, aneuploidy,
are common characteristics of most cancers (17) and correlate with poor prognosis in some
types of cancers (18). Many studies have provided evidence that chromosomal instability
participates in tumor initiation and progression (19). In fact, a series of genetic studies in
mice with defects in the spindle assembly checkpoint suggested that aneuploidy or
chromosomal instability promotes the development of tumors (20-24). Interestingly, MST1
and MST2 have been shown to be crucial for precise alignment of mitotic chromosomes.
HeLa cells depleted of MST1, MST2, or its downstream kinase NDR1, show unaligned
metaphase chromosomes, which can potentially lead to aneuploidy (25, 26). Intriguingly,
Ndr1-knockout mice developed T-cell lymphomas at their old age (27).
Here, for the first time, we demonstrate that Mst1 functions in suppressing tumor
development in lymphocytes in vivo. Lymphoma development is accelerated in Mst1-
deficient mice upon mutagen treatment or p53 deletion. Furthermore, Mst1-deficient
lymphocytes are prone to mis-segregate chromosomes during mitosis and show increased
levels of aneuploidy, which likely contributes to tumorigenesis. These data suggest that Mst1
functions as a tumor suppressor in lymphocytes by maintaining genomic integrity during
mitosis.
Materials and Methods
Mice
Mst1-/- mice (28) were backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice seven times before being used in
4
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
experiments. For N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced lymphoma development, 3- to 8-
week-old mice were given 100 mg/kg ENU (Sigma) via intraperitoneal injection, and
observed for 8 months. Mice observed to be moribund during the course of the study were
euthanized and subjected to a complete necropsy. Mst1-/- mice were bred to p53-/- mice (29)
to generate cohorts of p53-/-Mst1+/+ and p53-/-Mst1-/- mice. Mice care and experiments were
performed in accordance with procedures approved by the Korea Advanced Institute of
Science and Technology-Animal Care and Use Committee.
Flow cytometry
For double-negative (DN) subset analysis, thymocytes were stained with antibodies against
the following lineage-specific markers: CD4 (RM4-5), CD8a (53-6.7), TCRβ (H57-597), Gr1
(RB6-8C5), CD11b (3A33), B220 (RA3-6B2), Nk1.1 (PK136), TER119, CD44 (IM7), CD25
(PC61.5), and c-Kit (2B8). All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences or
eBioscience. Flow cytometric analyses were performed using a FACS Calibur or LSR II (BD
Biosciences) system.
Cell proliferation
For in vitro proliferation assays, thymocytes were placed in 96-well plate with RPMI-1640
medium at a density of 2x105 cells per well. Cells were stimulated with 5 ng/ml phorbol 12-
myristate 13-acetate (PMA; Sigma) and 250 ng/ml ionomycin (Sigma) for 72 hours. Cell
numbers were determined by measuring absorbance at 450 nm after incubating with WST-1
reagent (Daeil Lab Services). Average absorbance values of triplicate samples were used. For
in vivo 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation assays, wild-type and Mst1-/- mice
were intraperitoneally injected with 50 mg/kg of BrdU. After 1 hour, thymocyte were isolated
and immunostained with antibodies against CD4, CD8, and TCRβ to determine thymocyte
subsets. Fixation and staining for BrdU detection were performed using the BrdU Flow Kit
5
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
(BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Histological analyses
Tissues were fixed in 10% formalin at 4 °C, embedded in paraffin, sectioned (4 μm thickness),
and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).
Immunofluorescence
Freshly isolated thymocytes were incubated with RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 5
ng/ml PMA and 250 ng/ml ionomycin for 60 hours. Cytospin preparations of cultured
thymocytes were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with antibodies against phosphorylated
histone H3 (Cell Signaling) and α-tubulin (Calbiochem), and then counterstained with 4',6-
diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Confocal images were obtained using a LSM710 laser-
scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss).
Metaphase chromosome spreads
Freshly isolated splenocytes were incubated with RPMI-1640 medium containing 5 μg/ml
lipopolysaccharide (Sigma) and 5 μg/ml concanavalin A (Sigma) for 48 hours before used in
karyotyping. Karyotyping procedures were described previously (21).
Array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH)
Array CGH studies were performed using the SurePrint G3 mouse CGH Microarray 180k Kit
(Agilent Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. See Supplementary
Materials and Methods for details.
In silico analysis of MST1 expression in hematological tumors
Comparative analyses between normal and tumor cells were performed with the use of
publically available microarray data from the Oncomine database (30). Gene expression
microarray data of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) cohort were downloaded
from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GSE26713). See Supplementary
6
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Materials and Methods for details.
Results
Mst1 deficiency increases susceptibility to ENU-induced lymphomagenesis.
Mst1 is most abundantly expressed in hematopoietic cells, including lymphocytes, and plays
a role in regulating peripheral T cell proliferation and adhesion (31, 32). However, Mst1-/-
mice rarely develop spontaneous tumors in lymphoid organs (15). To investigate whether
Mst1 plays a role in inhibiting mutagen-induced tumorigenesis in lymphocytes of these mice,
we injected wild-type and Mst1-/- mice with the same amount of ENU, which is a highly
potent mutagen that induces mostly thymic lymphomas in mice (33). During the 8-month
observation, only 5% of wild-type mice died at this dose of ENU, whereas 50% of Mst1-/-
mice became moribund with symptoms of cachexia and dyspnea (Fig. 1A, Supplementary
Table S1). In most cases, the thymus and spleen were massively enlarged in these moribund
Mst1-/- mice (Fig. 1B). Stains of peripheral blood smears revealed the existence of large blast
cells in Mst1-/- mice in contrast to the small lymphocytes present in wild-type mice (Fig. 1C).
Histological analyses of moribund Mst1-/- mice further revealed that tumor cells had spread to
many organs, including the thymus, spleen, bone marrow, liver, kidney, and lung (Fig. 1D).
Intriguingly, in some cases, tumor cells were found only in the thymus, suggesting that
tumors in Mst1-/- mice could have originated in the thymus and progressed to widespread
leukemic stages in some mice. We further analyzed immunophenotypes of tumor cells in
various hematopoietic tissues using flow cytometry. Ectopic CD4+/-CD8+ cells were detected
in thymus, spleen, bone marrow, and peripheral blood of moribund Mst1-/- mice (Fig. 1E),
indicating that the tumor cells belonged to the T-cell lineage and were similar to immature
double-positive (DP) T cells. The tumors were mono- or oligo-clonal in origin, and
7
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
transplantable to irradiated recipient mice (Supplementary Fig. S1A-C). Taken together, these
data indicate that mice injected with ENU develop thymic lymphomas or precursor T-cell
lymphomas/leukemias, as has been previously reported, and Mst1-/- mice are more prone to
ENU-induced lymphomagenesis.
Mst1 is not required for T-lineage development.
To elucidate the mechanism by which Mst1 deficiency accelerates T lymphoma development,
we first investigated T lymphocyte development in Mst1-/- mice. T lymphocytes develop in
the thymus and progress through double-negative (DN), intermediate-single-positive (ISP),
double-positive (DP) and, finally, single-positive (4SP or 8SP) stages. Developmental arrest
at certain stages, such as DN3 or DP, has been reported to accelerate lymphoma development
in several mouse models (34, 35). Mst1-/- mice showed no significant differences in
thymocyte composition except for a mild increase in SP cells, as previously reported (Fig. 2A,
B). Increases in CD4 and CD8 SP subsets are thought to be due to a defect in thymic egress
(31, 36). A more detailed analysis of DN populations also revealed normal development
through DN1 to DN4 stages in these mutant animals (Fig. 2C, D). Furthermore, BrdU pulse-
chase experiments revealed that Mst1-/- thymocytes that incorporated BrdU during their DN
stages progressed to DP (day 2) and SP (day 5) cells with similar kinetics to wild-type cells
(Supplementary Fig. S2A-B). Thus, these data suggest that Mst1 deficiency does not induce
overt defects in thymocyte development that might contribute to lymphomagenesis.
Mst1 deficiency does not significantly affect thymocyte proliferation or apoptosis.
Given that Mst1 mediates crucial apoptotic functions, we investigated whether Mst1
deficiency affected basal apoptotic levels in thymocytes. However, annexin-V staining
revealed no significant reduction in the apoptotic levels of Mst1-/- thymocytes compared to
wild-type thymocytes both in freshly isolated and in vitro cultured conditions (Fig. 3A,
8
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Supplementary Fig. 2C-G). Of interest, we observed that Mst2 levels were not different
between wild-type and Mst1-/- thymocytes (Supplementary Fig. S2H), suggesting that Mst2
did not compensate for Mst1 deficiency during apoptosis. Thus, the loss of Mst1 does not
appear to contribute to tumorigenesis by affecting apoptosis in thymocytes.
We next attempted to examine the cell proliferation rate in Mst1-/- thymocytes. To do this,
we injected BrdU into wild-type and Mst1-/- mice and examined the percentage of BrdU-
positive cells in each thymocyte subset. BrdU incorporation rates in DN, ISP, and DP subsets
were similar between the two genotypes (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, CD4SP and CD8SP subsets
in Mst1-/- mice showed significantly reduced levels of BrdU incorporation. In vitro cultured
wild-type and Mst1-/- thymocytes also showed similar degrees of proliferation, as revealed by
WST assays and BrdU incorporation (Supplementary Fig. S2I-J). Taken together, these data
indicate that it is unlikely that tumor acceleration in Mst1-/- mice was due to decreased
apoptosis or increased proliferation of mutant thymocytes.
Mst1-/- lymphocytes display both chromosomal instability and aneuploidy.
How might the loss of Mst1 accelerate lymphomagenesis? On the basis of previous studies
showing that MST1 promotes precise alignment of mitotic chromosomes (25), we
hypothesized that the loss of Mst1 in thymocytes causes chromosomal instability during
mitosis and promotes tumorigenesis. To test this hypothesis, we cultured wild-type and Mst1-
/- thymocytes in vitro and stimulated them with PMA and ionomycin to promote their entry
into the cell cycle. After 2 days of culture, cells were fixed and stained with antibodies
against α-tubulin and phospho-histone H3, and counterstained with DAPI. We focused on
metaphase to telophase cells since aberrantly positioned chromosomes, if present, are most
easily recognized during these phases (inspected mitotic cells: n=1182 for WT; n=1616 for
Mst1-/-). Notably, abnormal mitotic patterns were observed at a higher rate in Mst1-/- cells
9
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
than in wild-type cells (Fig. 4A-E, Supplementary Fig. S3). The percentage of cells having
misaligned metaphase chromosomes, lagging chromosomes, or chromosome bridges was all
increased in Mst1-/- cells compared to wild-type cells (Fig. 4B-D). Furthermore, micronuclei
were more frequently observed in Mst1-/- cells after cytokinesis (Fig. 4Am-p).
Next, we investigated whether the observed chromosomal instability in Mst1-/- cells could
contribute to the formation of aneuploidy in primary lymphocytes. Chromosome spreads
from wild-type and Mst1-/- splenocytes showed that the latter contained a higher percentage
of aneuploid cells whose chromosome numbers deviated from the normal modal number of
40 (Fig. 4F-H). These results indicate that Mst1-/- lymphocytes showed increased levels of
chromosomal instability, which might contribute to accelerated lymphoma formation in
ENU-treated Mst1-/- mice.
Loss of Mst1 accelerates lymphoma development in p53-/- mice.
The p53 pathway has recently been shown to inhibit proliferation of aneuploid cells in
culture (17) and suppress tumor development in aneuploidy-generating mouse models (37).
These facts led us to hypothesize that aneuploid cells induced by the loss of Mst1 would be
able to proliferate and contribute to lymphomagenesis in the absence of functional p53. To
test this hypothesis in vivo, we examined tumor-free survivals of p53-/-Mst1+/+ and p53-/-Mst1-
/- mice. As reported in previous study (29), all p53-/-Mst1+/+ mice developed tumors within 8
months of age (Fig. 5A). The tumors that developed in these mice included thymic lymphoma
(50%), sarcoma (25%), and one brain tumor (Supplementary Table S2). Notably, p53-/-Mst1-/-
mice showed accelerated lymphoma development; of these, 70% developed lymphomas with
a reduced latency compared to p53-/-Mst1+/+ mice (113 days vs. 172 days; Fig. 5B). These
tumor cells were either CD4-CD8+ or CD4+CD8+ (Fig. 5C).
To further investigate the effects of Mst1 deficiency on chromosomal instability, we
10
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
performed chromosome counts on wild-type, Mst1-/-, p53-/-Mst1+/-, and p53-/-Mst1-/- MEFs
(Supplementary Table S3). Mst1-/- MEFs showed increased number of aneuploid cells
compared to wild-type (35% vs. 22%). Notably, aneuploidy rate became higher in p53-/-Mst1-
/- MEFs (49%), whereas p53-/-Mst1+/- MEFs exhibited similar rate of aneuploidy to wild-type.
We next performed array CGH to compare the genomes of thymic lymphoma cells from p53-
/-Mst1+/+ and p53-/-Mst1-/- mice. Lymphoma cells from both genotypes showed considerable
genomic abnormalities, including whole chromosomal gains and losses in various
chromosomes (Fig. 5D). However, we could not observe more gross abnormalities in p53-/-
Mst1-/- lymphoma cells than in p53-/-Mst1+/+ lymphoma cells. This is likely due to the oligo-
clonal nature of p53-/-Mst1-/- lymphomas, since CGH signals from the gain or loss of certain
chromosomes in one clone may be hidden by signals from other clones. These data, taken
together, suggest that loss of Mst1 significantly promotes lymphoma development in the
absence of p53, possibly through generation of chromosomal instability and genomic
aberrations.
Lymphoma acceleration by Mst1-deficient mice is not dependent on Yap1 activation.
Given that the inactivation of Yap1 by Mst1/2 signaling is a key mechanism for tumor
suppression in the liver (38), we sought to examine whether accelerated lymphoma
development in Mst1-deficient mice is caused by activation of Yap1. To test this, we
examined Yap1 expression according to Mst1 genotypes. Importantly, Yap1 expression in
lymphoid tissues (thymus, spleen, and lymph node) from wild-type mice was below the limit
of detection by ordinary immunoblotting, whereas large amounts of Yap1 were expressed in
most epithelial tissues (lung, liver, and pancreas) (Supplementary Fig. S4A). Yap1 was also
barely detectable in lymphoid tissues from Mst1-/- mice (data not shown). Although Yap1 is
not expressed in normal lymphoid tissues, it is possible that Yap1 is specifically upregulated
11
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
during tumorigenesis. However, ENU-induced lymphomas from Mst1-/- mice rarely
expressed Yap1 (Supplementary Fig. S4B). Specifically, only two out of seven lymphoma
samples showed mild Yap1 expression. These data suggest that Yap1 upregulation is not
critical for ENU-induced lymphoma development in Mst1-/- mice.
Unlike ENU-induced lymphoma cells, spontaneous lymphomas from p53-null background
mice usually exhibit Yap1 upregulation, as determined by immunoblotting and RT-PCR
(Supplementary Fig. S4C, D). Both p53-/-Mst1+/+ and p53-/-Mst1-/- lymphomas expressed
Yap1 to a similar extent. More importantly, the level of Yap1 Ser127 phosphorylation, which
is considered to be mediated by Mst-Lats kinase signaling, was not different between p53-/-
Mst1+/+ and p53-/-Mst1-/- samples. These data indicate that (i) Yap1 upregulation is
independent of Mst1 deficiency, and (ii) Mst1 is not a crucial upstream regulator of Yap1
Ser127 phosphorylation, at least not in p53-/-Mst1+/+ lymphoma cells.
MST1 (STK4) expression is reduced in various human lymphoma/leukemia samples.
Finally, we sought to determine whether our genetic studies in mice have clinical relevance to
human hematopoietic malignancies. We thus performed in silico screening of the microarray
database at the Oncomine website to examine expression levels of MST1 (STK4) in human
hematopoietic malignancies. The human disease that most closely corresponds to our mouse
lymphoma models is T-ALL, since both originate from immature precursor cells, involve
upregulated Notch1, and are spread throughout the body (Fig. 1, 5, Supplementary Fig. S1D-
E) (39). Hence, we examined acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) samples for MST1
expression. The median expression values of MST1 in both T-ALL and B-ALL samples were
significantly reduced compared to normal in two independent analyses (Fig. 6A, B) (40, 41).
Similarly, remarkable down-regulation of MST1 was further confirmed in an independent
cohort consisting of 117 T-ALL tissues (Fig. 6C) (42).
12
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
We then examined MST1 expression in lymphomas, which are believed to originate from
more mature lymphocytes. The expression of MST1 was reduced in multiple mature B-cell
lymphomas, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma (Fig. 6D) (43-
45). These results suggest that MST1 insufficiency is likely an important contributing factor
in the pathogenesis of precursor lymphoblastic leukemia as well as mature lymphocyte
neoplasms in humans.
Discussion
Here, using two well-known mouse lymphoma models—ENU-induced lymphoma and p53
knockout-driven lymphoma—we report for the first time that loss of Mst1 accelerates tumor
development. Although Mst1 deficiency accelerated tumor development in both settings, it
had little, if any, effect on thymocyte proliferation or apoptosis. Instead, the accelerated
tumorigenesis was accompanied by increased levels of chromosomal instability and
aneuploidy in Mst1-/- lymphocytes.
The rate of spontaneous apoptosis in Mst1-/- thymocytes was comparable to that in wild-
type thymocytes. Furthermore, in vitro culture with various apoptosis-inducing drugs
revealed no differences in the rate of cell death between wild-type and Mst1-/- thymocytes.
These results were quite surprising given the demonstrated pro-apoptotic role of Mst1 in
many in vitro settings. Since we could not detect any increase of Mst2 expression in Mst1-/-
cells, it is not likely that Mst2 compensates for Mst1 deficiency in the regulation of
thymocyte apoptosis. Moreover, Mst1/2 double-knockout MEFs do not exhibit impaired
apoptosis in response to various apoptotic signals (M.J. Kim and D.S. Lim, unpublished data),
indicating that Mst1 may not be crucial for mediating apoptotic signaling, at least not in
untransformed primary MEFs.
13
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Both ENU-induced lymphoma and p53 knockout-driven lymphoma developed after long
latencies (>4 months) and were clonal in origin. These characteristics suggest a requirement
for additional genetic mutations in tumor development. In such circumstances, gain of a
single genetic mutation that can impair the integrity of genome may accelerate tumor
development by increasing the probability of acquiring additional mutations. In line with this
argument, we found strong evidence that loss of Mst1 could trigger genomic instability in
thymocytes. Mst1-/- thymocytes displayed an increased number of mitotic cells with
abnormally positioned chromosomes compared to wild-type cells. Karyotypic analyses also
revealed an increased level of aneuploidy in Mst1-/- splenocytes. The elevated level of
aneuploidy in Mst1-/- lymphocytes might be caused by hyperactivation of Aurora B kinase, as
in HeLa cells (25). However, we failed to detect increase in the activating phosphorylation of
Aurora B or phosphorylation of its substrate, histone H3 (Supplementary Fig. S5). It is
possible that our experimental methods used in HeLa cells (25) might be unsuitable for the
detection of phospho-Aurora B in suspension cells. Or there might be an unrevealed
aneuploid-generating mechanism induced by loss of Mst1 in lymphocytes. Recently, MST2-
activated NDR1 has been implicated in the regulation of microtubule dynamics and precise
alignment of mitotic chromosomes (26). It is also noted that Ndr1-null mice were prone to the
development of T-cell lymphoma at their old age (27). Thus, Mst1 and/or Mst2 might relay
signals to Ndr1 kinase regulating spindle microtubule dynamics and, consequently,
chromosomal instability.
The increase in the percentage of aneuploid cells in Mst1-/- splenocytes was less dramatic
than that reported for cells defective in spindle assembly checkpoint (38% in Bub1-/H vs. 15%
in Mst1-/-) (23). Because the spindle assembly checkpoint functions normally in Mst1-/- cells
(data not shown), some portion of mitotic Mst1-/- cells with misaligned chromosomes could
14
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
be corrected during the mitotic checkpoint activation. This could also provide a plausible
explanation for the observation that Mst1 single-knockout mice do not develop spontaneous
tumors, whereas mice lacking the spindle assembly checkpoint gene do develop various kinds
of tumors at an advanced age.
Recently, Avruch et al. suggested that Mst1 and Mst2 function as “gatekeeper” genes in the
development of liver cancer (38). Liver-specific Mst1/2 homozygous mutant mice showed
marked liver enlargement due to increased proliferation of hepatocytes, and eventually
developed liver tumors. Thus, Mst1 and Mst2 satisfy the prerequisites of being gatekeepers in
that both directly control cellular proliferation (46). Here, we showed that, unlike the case of
the liver, neither cell proliferation nor apoptosis in thymocytes was affected by the loss of
Mst1. Instead, our study implies that Mst1 may serve as a “caretaker” (46) to maintain the
integrity of the genome during mitosis in lymphocytes. Although it is possible that Mst1 and
Mst2 compensate for each other in regulating epithelial cell proliferation and tumorigenesis
(10-13), we have found that deletion of both Mst1 and Mst2 specifically in hematopoietic
lineages does not induce hyperplasia or spontaneous hematopoietic neoplasms over a 6-
month observation period (T.S. Kim and D.S. Lim, unpublished data).
Interestingly, thymic lymphomas in a p53-null background almost always showed
significant upregulation of Yap1, regardless of Mst1 genotype. Yap1 upregulation in
spontaneous tumors from p53-/-Mst1+/+ mice have been previously observed by others using
mammary epithelial cell tumors or osteosarcomas (47, 48). Yap1 upregulation in p53-/-Mst1+/+
tumors seems to reflect an acquisition of a selective advantage by the combined p53 loss and
Yap1 upregulation through an unknown mechanism. Thus, we conclude that Yap1 activation
is unrelated to the accelerated lymphomagenesis caused by the loss of Mst1.
Finally, we provided evidence that the loss of MST1 is relevant to the pathogenesis of
15
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
human lymphomas/leukemias. The expression levels of MST1 were significantly reduced in
various lymphoma/leukemia patient samples, supporting our notion that the loss of MST1
could contribute to tumorigenesis in hematopoietic lineages. Our results from three
independent T-ALL cohorts analyzed in this study showed different degree of MST1
downregulation (Fig. 6A left, dramatic; Fig. 6A right, subtle). This discrepancy may have
arisen because the diversity within T-ALLs, which can be classified into at least five
subgroups with distinct gene expression pattern (49), was not taken into account.
In conclusion, our study has provided insights into the role of Mst1 in maintaining faithful
segregation of chromosomes during mitosis in lymphocytes, and shown that deregulation of
Mst1 accelerates lymphoma development in cooperation with p53 deficiency.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Jin-Man Kim at the College of Medicine, Chungnam National
University, for pathological analyses.
Grant Support
This study was supported by a grant from the National Creative Research Initiatives Program
(20120001228).
References
1. Dan I, Watanabe NM, Kusumi A. The Ste20 group kinases as regulators of MAP
kinase cascades. Trends in cell biology. 2001;11:220-30.
2. Ling P, Lu TJ, Yuan CJ, Lai MD. Biosignaling of mammalian Ste20-related kinases.
Cellular signalling. 2008;20:1237-47.
16
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
3. Radu M, Chernoff J. The DeMSTification of mammalian Ste20 kinases. Current
biology : CB. 2009;19:R421-5.
4. Praskova M, Xia F, Avruch J. MOBKL1A/MOBKL1B phosphorylation by MST1
and MST2 inhibits cell proliferation. Current biology : CB. 2008;18:311-21.
5. Katagiri K, Imamura M, Kinashi T. Spatiotemporal regulation of the kinase Mst1 by
binding protein RAPL is critical for lymphocyte polarity and adhesion. Nature immunology.
2006;7:919-28.
6. Pan D. Hippo signaling in organ size control. Genes & development. 2007;21:886-97.
7. Harvey K, Tapon N. The Salvador-Warts-Hippo pathway - an emerging tumour-
suppressor network. Nature reviews Cancer. 2007;7:182-91.
8. Zhao B, Li L, Lei Q, Guan KL. The Hippo-YAP pathway in organ size control and
tumorigenesis: an updated version. Genes & development. 2010;24:862-74.
9. St John MA, Tao W, Fei X, Fukumoto R, Carcangiu ML, Brownstein DG, et al. Mice
deficient of Lats1 develop soft-tissue sarcomas, ovarian tumours and pituitary dysfunction.
Nature genetics. 1999;21:182-6.
10. Zhou D, Zhang Y, Wu H, Barry E, Yin Y, Lawrence E, et al. Mst1 and Mst2 protein
kinases restrain intestinal stem cell proliferation and colonic tumorigenesis by inhibition of
Yes-associated protein (Yap) overabundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America. 2011.
11. Cai J, Zhang N, Zheng Y, de Wilde RF, Maitra A, Pan D. The Hippo signaling
pathway restricts the oncogenic potential of an intestinal regeneration program. Genes &
development. 2010;24:2383-8.
12. Song H, Mak KK, Topol L, Yun K, Hu J, Garrett L, et al. Mammalian Mst1 and Mst2
kinases play essential roles in organ size control and tumor suppression. Proceedings of the
17
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:1431-6.
13. Lu L, Li Y, Kim SM, Bossuyt W, Liu P, Qiu Q, et al. Hippo signaling is a potent in
vivo growth and tumor suppressor pathway in the mammalian liver. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:1437-42.
14. Lee KP, Lee JH, Kim TS, Kim TH, Park HD, Byun JS, et al. The Hippo-Salvador
pathway restrains hepatic oval cell proliferation, liver size, and liver tumorigenesis.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
2010;107:8248-53.
15. Zhou D, Conrad C, Xia F, Park JS, Payer B, Yin Y, et al. Mst1 and Mst2 maintain
hepatocyte quiescence and suppress hepatocellular carcinoma development through
inactivation of the Yap1 oncogene. Cancer cell. 2009;16:425-38.
16. Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J, Wu S, Zhang N, Comerford SA, et al. Elucidation of
a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell. 2007;130:1120-33.
17. Thompson SL, Compton DA. Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a
p53-dependent mechanism. The Journal of cell biology. 2010;188:369-81.
18. Carter SL, Eklund AC, Kohane IS, Harris LN, Szallasi Z. A signature of
chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in
multiple human cancers. Nature genetics. 2006;38:1043-8.
19. Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy
and tumorigenesis. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2009;10:478-87.
20. Ricke RM, Jeganathan KB, van Deursen JM. Bub1 overexpression induces
aneuploidy and tumor formation through Aurora B kinase hyperactivation. The Journal of cell
biology. 2011;193:1049-64.
21. Schliekelman M, Cowley DO, O'Quinn R, Oliver TG, Lu L, Salmon ED, et al.
18
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Impaired Bub1 function in vivo compromises tension-dependent checkpoint function leading
to aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Cancer research. 2009;69:45-54.
22. Sotillo R, Hernando E, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Teruya-Feldstein J, Cordon-Cardo C,
Lowe SW, et al. Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice.
Cancer cell. 2007;11:9-23.
23. Jeganathan K, Malureanu L, Baker DJ, Abraham SC, van Deursen JM. Bub1
mediates cell death in response to chromosome missegregation and acts to suppress
spontaneous tumorigenesis. The Journal of cell biology. 2007;179:255-67.
24. Michel LS, Liberal V, Chatterjee A, Kirchwegger R, Pasche B, Gerald W, et al.
MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in
mammalian cells. Nature. 2001;409:355-9.
25. Oh HJ, Kim MJ, Song SJ, Kim T, Lee D, Kwon SH, et al. MST1 limits the kinase
activity of aurora B to promote stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Current biology :
CB. 2010;20:416-22.
26. Chiba S, Ikeda M, Katsunuma K, Ohashi K, Mizuno K. MST2- and Furry-mediated
activation of NDR1 kinase is critical for precise alignment of mitotic chromosomes. Current
biology : CB. 2009;19:675-81.
27. Cornils H, Stegert MR, Hergovich A, Hynx D, Schmitz D, Dirnhofer S, et al.
Ablation of the kinase NDR1 predisposes mice to the development of T cell lymphoma.
Science signaling. 2010;3:ra47.
28. Choi J, Oh S, Lee D, Oh HJ, Park JY, Lee SB, et al. Mst1-FoxO signaling protects
Naive T lymphocytes from cellular oxidative stress in mice. PloS one. 2009;4:e8011.
29. Jacks T, Remington L, Williams BO, Schmitt EM, Halachmi S, Bronson RT, et al.
Tumor spectrum analysis in p53-mutant mice. Current biology : CB. 1994;4:1-7.
19
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
30. Rhodes DR, Yu J, Shanker K, Deshpande N, Varambally R, Ghosh D, et al.
ONCOMINE: a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform. Neoplasia.
2004;6:1-6.
31. Katagiri K, Katakai T, Ebisuno Y, Ueda Y, Okada T, Kinashi T. Mst1 controls
lymphocyte trafficking and interstitial motility within lymph nodes. The EMBO journal.
2009;28:1319-31.
32. Zhou D, Medoff BD, Chen L, Li L, Zhang XF, Praskova M, et al. The Nore1B/Mst1
complex restrains antigen receptor-induced proliferation of naive T cells. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:20321-6.
33. Kakinuma S, Nishimura M, Kubo A, Nagai JY, Amasaki Y, Majima HJ, et al.
Frequent retention of heterozygosity for point mutations in p53 and Ikaros in N-ethyl-N-
nitrosourea-induced mouse thymic lymphomas. Mutation research. 2005;572:132-41.
34. Haines BB, Ryu CJ, Chang S, Protopopov A, Luch A, Kang YH, et al. Block of T cell
development in P53-deficient mice accelerates development of lymphomas with
characteristic RAG-dependent cytogenetic alterations. Cancer cell. 2006;9:109-20.
35. Bessette K, Lang ML, Fava RA, Grundy M, Heinen J, Horne L, et al. A Stat5b
transgene is capable of inducing CD8+ lymphoblastic lymphoma in the absence of normal
TCR/MHC signaling. Blood. 2008;111:344-50.
36. Dong Y, Du X, Ye J, Han M, Xu T, Zhuang Y, et al. A cell-intrinsic role for Mst1 in
regulating thymocyte egress. J Immunol. 2009;183:3865-72.
37. Li M, Fang X, Baker DJ, Guo L, Gao X, Wei Z, et al. The ATM-p53 pathway
suppresses aneuploidy-induced tumorigenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:14188-93.
38. Avruch J, Zhou D, Fitamant J, Bardeesy N. Mst1/2 signalling to Yap: gatekeeper for
20
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
liver size and tumour development. British journal of cancer. 2011;104:24-32.
39. Grabher C, von Boehmer H, Look AT. Notch 1 activation in the molecular
pathogenesis of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature reviews Cancer. 2006;6:347-59.
40. Haferlach T, Kohlmann A, Wieczorek L, Basso G, Kronnie GT, Bene MC, et al.
Clinical utility of microarray-based gene expression profiling in the diagnosis and
subclassification of leukemia: report from the International Microarray Innovations in
Leukemia Study Group. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American
Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28:2529-37.
41. Andersson A, Ritz C, Lindgren D, Eden P, Lassen C, Heldrup J, et al. Microarray-
based classification of a consecutive series of 121 childhood acute leukemias: prediction of
leukemic and genetic subtype as well as of minimal residual disease status. Leukemia :
official journal of the Leukemia Society of America, Leukemia Research Fund, UK.
2007;21:1198-203.
42. Homminga I, Pieters R, Langerak AW, de Rooi JJ, Stubbs A, Verstegen M, et al.
Integrated transcript and genome analyses reveal NKX2-1 and MEF2C as potential
oncogenes in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer cell. 2011;19:484-97.
43. Basso K, Margolin AA, Stolovitzky G, Klein U, Dalla-Favera R, Califano A. Reverse
engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells. Nature genetics. 2005;37:382-90.
44. Rosenwald A, Alizadeh AA, Widhopf G, Simon R, Davis RE, Yu X, et al. Relation of
gene expression phenotype to immunoglobulin mutation genotype in B cell chronic
lymphocytic leukemia. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2001;194:1639-47.
45. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, Ma C, Lossos IS, Rosenwald A, et al. Distinct
types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature.
2000;403:503-11.
21
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
46. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Cancer-susceptibility genes. Gatekeepers and caretakers.
Nature. 1997;386:761, 3.
47. Cheng L, Zhou Z, Flesken-Nikitin A, Toshkov IA, Wang W, Camps J, et al. Rb
inactivation accelerates neoplastic growth and substitutes for recurrent amplification of
cIAP1, cIAP2 and Yap1 in sporadic mammary carcinoma associated with p53 deficiency.
Oncogene. 2010;29:5700-11.
48. Ma O, Cai WW, Zender L, Dayaram T, Shen J, Herron AJ, et al. MMP13, Birc2
(cIAP1), and Birc3 (cIAP2), amplified on chromosome 9, collaborate with p53 deficiency in
mouse osteosarcoma progression. Cancer research. 2009;69:2559-67.
49. Van Vlierberghe P, Pieters R, Beverloo HB, Meijerink JP. Molecular-genetic insights
in paediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. British journal of haematology.
2008;143:153-68.
Figure legends
Figure 1. Mst1-/- mice are more prone to developing lymphomas/leukemias upon ENU
treatment.
A. Tumor-free survival curves for ENU-treated wild-type (n=24) and Mst1-/- (n=26) mice. B.
Representative pictures of wild-type and Mst1-/- mice from the analysis in A. C. Peripheral
blood smears of wild-type and moribund Mst1-/- mice. D. H&E-stained histopathological
sections of various tissues from wild-type and Mst1-/- mice. Inset: High magnification view;
black asterisks indicate infiltrating tumor cells. Scale bars, 200 μm (kidney) and 500 μm (all
other organs). E. FACS plots of cells from various hematopoietic tissues, showing
CD4+/-CD8+ blast cells in Mst1-/- tissues.
22
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 2. Thymocyte development is relatively normal in Mst1-/- mice.
A. Representative FACS plots showing CD4 and CD8 expression in total thymocytes.
Numbers indicate percentages of each subset among total thymocytes. B. Bar graph of
analysis in A. Sex-matched, 6-week-old mice were used (WT, n=3; Mst1-/-, n=3). C.
Representative FACS plots of DN subsets. DN (lineage- c-Kit+) cells were further divided into
five subgroups according to their CD44 and CD25 expression. D. Bar graph of analysis in C.
Except for slight decreases in DN1 and DN2 subsets, development through DN stages was
normal in Mst1-/- mice. Sex-matched 5-week-old mice were used (WT, n=4; Mst1-/-, n=6). *p-
value<0.05; **p-value<0.01.
Figure 3. Mst1 deficiency does not promote tumorigenesis via effects on apoptosis or cell
proliferation.
A. Freshly isolated thymocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry for basal apoptosis levels
and expression patterns of CD4, CD8, and surface TCRβ. Results are shown in the bar graph
(WT, n=5; Mst1-/-, n=5). B. In vivo BrdU incorporation of wild-type and Mst1-/- thymocytes
were analyzed using flow cytometry. Results are shown in the bar graph (WT, n=7; Mst1-/-,
n=7). *p-value<0.05, **p-value<0.01, ***p-value<0.001.
Figure 4. Mst1 deficiency results in increased chromosomal instability and aneuploidy
in lymphocytes.
A. Representative confocal microscopic images of mitotic Mst1-/- thymocytes. a-d, metaphase
cell with misaligned chromosomes; e-h, anaphase cell with lagging chromosome; i-l,
telophase cell with chromosome bridge; m-p, two daughter cells with micronuclei. Scale bar,
10 μm. B-E. Bar graphs showing percentages of abnormal mitotic cells in wild-type and
23
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Mst1-/- thymocytes. F. Representative images of metaphase chromosome spreads from wild-
type and Mst1-/- splenocytes. G. Chromosome counting analysis of metaphase spreads
showing an increase in aneuploid cells in Mst1-/- splenocytes. Similar results were obtained in
two independent analyses. H. Summary of the results in G.
Figure 5. Lymphoma development is accelerated by the loss of Mst1 in p53-/- mice.
A. Tumor-free survival curves for p53-/-Mst1+/+ (n=9) and p53-/-Mst1-/- mice (n=7) (p-
value=0.0001, Log-Rank Test). B. Lymphoma-free survival curves for the same cohorts in A
(p-value=0.0003). C. Representative FACS plots of lymphoma cells from p53-/-Mst1+/+ and
p53-/-Mst1-/- mice compared to wild-type control thymocytes. D. Data from array CGH
analysis of p53-/-Mst1+/+ and p53-/-Mst1-/- lymphomas compared to wild-type thymocytes
showing numerous whole chromosomal gains and segmental deletions. Results for four
representative chromosomes are shown.
Figure 6. Various human lymphoma/leukemia samples exhibit reduced levels of MST1
(STK4) expression.
A, B. Relative levels of MST1 expression in T-ALL and B-ALL samples were assessed using
cDNA microarray data obtained from the Oncomine database. P-values were less than 1x10-10
for all analyses. C. MST1 expression in an independent T-ALL cohort was evaluated from the
microarray data obtained from GEO. D. Analyses of MST1 expression in various B-cell
lymphomas using the Oncomine database. MST1 expression was reduced significantly in all
analyses. Lanes 1, 2, 4, 6, and 11: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; lanes 3, 7, and 12:
follicular lymphoma; lane 5: Burkitt’s lymphoma; lane 8: hairy cell leukemia; lane 9: mantle
cell lymphoma; lane 10: primary effusion lymphoma. Scale for relative gene expression is
24
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
shown in color bars below. Blue, reduced expression; red, increased expression.
25
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 27, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Mammalian sterile 20-like kinase 1 (Mst1) suppresses lymphoma development by promoting faithful chromosome segregation
Tae-Shin Kim, Da-Hye Lee, Sang Kyum Kim, et al.
Cancer Res Published OnlineFirst August 27, 2012.
Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956
Supplementary Access the most recent supplemental material at: Material http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2012/08/24/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956.DC1
Author Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been Manuscript edited.
E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.
Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Subscriptions Department at [email protected].
Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2012/08/24/0008-5472.CAN-11-3956. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.
Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research.