THE TYPES of COLLEMBOLA (INSECTA) at the ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY Jose A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE TYPES of COLLEMBOLA (INSECTA) at the ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY Jose A THE TYPES OF COLLEMBOLA (INSECTA) AT THE ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY Jose A. Mari Mutt rJotS STATE WATER SURVrl UI8AR'f COPT MAY 3 1 liM Biological Notes No. 103 State of Illinois Illinois Natural History Survey Department of Registration and Education Urbana, Illinois -February 1978 Natural History Survey Division The Types of Collembola (Insecta) at the Illinois Natural History Survey Jose A. Mari Mutt Through the efforts of many people, among whom Anmida amorita Folsom l902b: 90 (5 syntypes) the late Dr. Harlow B. Mills deserves special credit, Anurida hammeri Christiansen l95lb: 135 (l para- the collection of Collembola of the Illinois Natural type) History Survey has become one of the largest and Brachystomella agrosa Wray l953b: 148 (2 syntypes) most complete in the Western Hemisphere. Never­ F1·iesea grandis Mills 1934: 21 (1 syntype) theless, no list of the types has been published.· This Friesea pen/acantha Mills 1934: 20 (I syntype) paper provides this list, making an important col­ Gnathocephalus aureofasciatus Harvey 1898: 216 lection more accessible to workers in the field. (head of a syntype) Types of 218 species and subspecies, including all Gnathocephalus complexus MacGillivray l893b: 318 primary and secondary types, are in the collection of (head of a syntype) the Illinois Natural History Survey. Generic and spe­ Hypogastrura brevispina (Harvey) 1893b: I82 (2 cific names are arranged in alphabetical sequence syntypes) under each family. Each species name is followed by Hypogastrura (Schoettella) caeca (Folsom) I927: 4 its author, the year of publication, and the number (75 syntypes) of the page on which the species description begins. Hypogastntra consanguinea (Folsom) l924b: 506 (37 This information is followed by the amount and syntypes in one vial) An additional vial contains kind of type material in the collection. The section many syntypes mixed with specimens of Hypogas­ on literature provides the reference to the original tntra matura. description of each species. Hypogastrura harveyi (Folsom) l902a: 320 (8I syn­ With the exception of the generic name Achorutes, types) which has been placed on the Official Index of Re­ Hypogastrura humi (Folsom) l9I6: 487 (95 syn­ jected and Invalid Names in Zoology (ICZN 1956) types) and for which the name Hypogast···um has been sub­ Hypogastrura jondavi (Wray) 1946: 79 (1 complete stituted (ICZN 1956), no further reference is made syntype and parts of a second) to synonymy. Author names placed in parentheses Hypogastrura rnacgillivmyi (Folsom) I9I6: 488 (over reflect the official change of Achorutes, under which 1,000 syntypes) the species was originally described, to Hypogastrura. Hypogastrura (Schoettella) minutissima (Mills) 1934: All names of genera and species are cited exactly as I4 (II syntypes) they appear in the original descriptions of the species Hypogastrum packardi (Folsom) 1902a: 319 (350 except that a few species names have had their end­ syntypes) ings changed so that they agree in gender with the Hypogastrum packardi dentata (Folsom) I902a: 320 names of their genera. (Ill syntypes) I wish to thank Dr. Kenneth A. Christiansen, De­ Hypogastrura pseudarmata (Folsom) 1916: 490 (over partment of Biology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa, l ,000 syntypes) for kindly reviewing the manuscript and Mrs. Alice Hypogastrura thornomys (Chamberlain) 1943: 39 Ann Prickett for drawing the cover illustration. (328 syntypes) Hypogastrura tigrina (Harvey) 1900: 552 (3 syn- LIST OF TYPES types) Family PODURIDAE sensu lata Micmnurida furcifera Mills I934: 27 (2 syntypes) Morulina callowayia Wray l953a: l (3 paratypes) Acherontides atoyacense Bonet 1945: 28 (10 para­ Neanura persimilis Mills 1934: 30 (3I syntypes) types) Neanum serrata Folsom 1916: 511 (fragments of a Anoum magna MacGillivray I893a: 128 (leg of a syntype) syntype) Odontella cornifer Mills I934: 25 (5 syntypes) This paper is published by authority of the State of Illinois, IRS Ch. Odontella ewingi Folsom I916: 502 (6 syntypes) 127, Par. 58. I 2. It is a contribution from the Section of Faunistic Surveys and Insect Identification of the 111inois Natural History Survey. Jose A. Pamnura caeca Folsom 1916: 507 (5 syntypes) Mari Mutt is a graduate student in the Department of Entomology, Uni· Paranura sexpunctata colora/a Mills 1934: 28 (5 syn- versity of Illinois, and a Research Assistant at the Illinois Natural History Survey. types) Cover Illustration.-Temer'ilas womersleyi (Denis) after a specimen deposited at the Illinois Natural History Survey. Drawing by Mrs. Alice Ann Prickett. 3 4 Protanura capitata Folsom 1932: 56 (4 syntypes) Isotoma andrei Mills 1934: 58 (10 syntypes) Schaefferia variabilis Christiansen 195lb: 125 (8 para- Isotoma caeruleatra Guthrie 1903: 70 (11 syntypes) types) Isotoma capitola MacGillivray 1896: 56 (2 legs of a Schoettella afba Folsom 1932: 54 (1 syntype) syntype) Stachia minuta Folsom 1932: 55 (65 syntypes) Isotoma (lsotoma) ditficilis Folsom 1937: 89 (5 syn­ Wilfemin denisi Mills 1932: 263 (2 syntypes) types) Wiflemia intermedia Mills 1934: 17 (4 syntypes) Isotoma eunotabilis Folsom in Mills 1934: 58 (16 syn­ Willemia persimilis Bonet 1945: 37 (2 syntypes) types) Wilfemia simifis Mills 1934: 17 (8 syntypes) Isotoma (lsotoma) gelida Folsom 1937: 106 (18 syn­ Xenylfa alba Folsom 1932: 54 (6 syntypes) types) Xenylla baconae Folsom 1916: 496 (217 syntypes) Isotoma glauca montana MacGillivray 1896: 57 (2 Xenylfa sensilis Folsom 1932: 54 (12 syntypes) syntypes) Xenylla welchi Folsom 1916: 497 (over 1,000 syn- Isotoma immersa Folsom l924a: l (over 500 syntypes) types) Isotorna rnacnamarai Folsom 1918: 291 (3 syntypes) Xenylla yucatana Mills 1938: 183 (2 syntypes) Isotoma (lsotoma) marissa Folsom 1937: 89 (11 syn- types) Family ONYCHIURIDAE Isotorna nigrifrons Folsom in Mills 1934: 60 (207 syn­ types) Aphorum cocklei Folsom 1908: 200 (63 syntypes) Isotoma nivalis Packard 1873: 31 (2 syntypes and Onychiurus irregularis Chamberlain 1943: 43 (2 syn- fragments of a third) types) Isotoma obsoleta MacGillivray 1896: 54 (fragments Onychiw-us millsi Chamberlain 1943: 42 (2 syntypes) of a syntype) Onychiurus obesus Mills 1934: 35 (10 syntypes) Isotoma sepulcmfis Folsom l902c: 364 (281 syntypes) Onychimus parvicomis Mills 1934: 33 (68 syntypes) Isotoma spatulata Chamberlain 1943: 43 (2 syntypes) Onychiw·us pseudofimetarius Folsom 1917: 650 (l Isotoma (lsotoma) subaequalis Folsom 1937: 107 (l syntype) syntype and fragments of a second) OnychiurussubtenuisFolsom 1917: 642 (l4syntypes) Isotoma terminata MacGillivray 1896: 56 (2 syntypes) Onychiurus wilchi Wray 1950: 98 (8 syntypes) Isotoma tridentata MacGillivray 1896: 51 (fragments Tullbe1·gia clavata Mills 1934: 38 (19 syntypes) of a syntype) Tulfbergia gmnulata Mills 1934: 37 (l paratype) Isotoma trispinata MacGillivray 1896: 51 (1 syntype) Tullbergia iowensis Mills 1932: 364 (22 syntypes) Isotoma (lsotoma) viridis pomona Folsom 1937: 115 Tullbergia silvicofa Folsom 1932: 57 (3 syntypes) (2 syntypes) Isotomodes denisi Folsom 1932: 59 (3 syntypes) Family ISOTOMIDAE Isotomodes tenuis Folsom in Mills 1934: 46 (2 syn­ Hypogastrura longispina (MacGillivray) l893b: 315 types) (over 500 syntypes) Isotomurus bemakus Wray 1952: 102 (5 syntypes) Boemerella octogenaria Mills & Schmidt 1957: 368 Isotomurus palustris texensis Folsom 1937: 76 (56 (46 syntypes) syntypes) Denisia falcata Folsom 1932: 61 (l syntype and frag­ Isotomurus retardatus Folsom 1937: 71 (2 syntypes) ments of a second) M icrisotoma achromata Bellinger 1952: 20 (l para- Folsomia decaxiophthalma Ford 1962: 131 (1 para­ type) type) Proisotoma americana Mills 1934: 51 (14 syntypes) Fofsomia duodecimoculata Ford 1962: 130 (l para­ Proisotoma bayouensis Mills 1931: l (131 syntypes) type) Proisotoma (Proisotoma) bulbosa Folsom 1937: 58 (1 Folsomia fimetaria dentata Folsom 1927: 7 (1 syn- syntype) · type) Proisotoma (Proisotoma) cognata Folsom 1937: 65 (19 Folsomia macroseta Ford 1962: 129 (l paratype) syntypes) Folsomia prima Mills 1931: 3 (2 syntypes) Proisotoma (Proisotoma) constricta Folsom 1937: 64 Fofsomia silvestrii Folsom 1937: 20 (2 syntypes) (17 syntypes and fragments of about 6 others) Folsomia sylvia Wray 1953b: 148 (l syntype) Proisotoma (Ballistura) excavata Folsom 1937: 41 (109 Folsomides decemoculatus Mills 1935: 134 (over 500 syntypes) syntypes) Proisotoma (Proisotoma) frisoni Folsom 1937: 55 (1 1 Folsomides parvus Folsom in Mills 1934: 43 (2 syn­ syntype) ] types) Proisotoma (Ballistura) laticauda Folsom 1937: 42 Folsomides stachi Folsom in Mills 1934: 45 (1 syn­ (fragments of a syntype) type) Proisotoma nigromaculosa Folsom 1932: 62 (9 syn­ Guthriella antigua Folsom 1937: 34 (33 syntypes) types) 5 Proisotoma (Proisotoma) rainieri Folsom 1937: 45 (I Entomobrya (Drepanura) sabulicola Mills 1931: 7 (1 syntype) syntype) Proisotoma (Proisotoma) simplex Folsom 1937: 61 Entomobrya washingtonia Mills 1935: 135 (8 syn­ (over 1,000 syntypes) types) Proisotoma (Proisotoma) tenelloides Folsom 1937: 62 Heteromurus stannardi Mari Mutt 1977a: 326 (2 (4 syntypes) para types) Proisotoma (Proisotoma) titusi Folsom 1937: 49 (14 Lepidocyrtus caprilesi Wray 1953b: 145 (holotype syntypes) and 2 paratypes) Proisotoma (Pmisotoma) vesiculata Folsom 1937: 57 Lepidocy1·tus cephalopurpureus Harvey 1894: 324 (1 (1 0 syntypes) syntype) Protanurophorus pearmani Womersley 1925: 251 (1 Lepidocyrtus cyaneus cinereus Folsom 1924a: 9 (13 syntype) syntypes) Pseudanurophorus arcticus Christiansen 195Ib: 131 Lepidocyrtus folsomi Mills 1931: 10 (1 0 syntypes) (7 paratypes) Lepidocyrtus intermixtus Folsom
Recommended publications
  • Why Are There So Many Exotic Springtails in Australia? a Review
    90 (3) · December 2018 pp. 141–156 Why are there so many exotic Springtails in Australia? A review. Penelope Greenslade1, 2 1 Environmental Management, School of School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia 2 Department of Biology, Australian National University, GPO Box, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 October 2018 | Accepted 23 November 2018 Published online at www.soil-organisms.de 1 December 2018 | Printed version 15 December 2018 DOI 10.25674/y9tz-1d49 Abstract Native invertebrate assemblages in Australia are adversely impacted by invasive exotic plants because they are replaced by exotic, invasive invertebrates. The reasons have remained obscure. The different physical, chemical and biotic characteristics of the novel habitat seem to present hostile conditions for native species. This results in empty niches. It seems the different ecologies of exotic invertebrate species may be better adapted to colonise these novel empty niches than native invertebrates. Native faunas of other southern continents that possess a highly endemic fauna, such as South America, South Africa and New Zealand, may have suffered the same impacts from exotic species but insufficient survey data and unreliable and old taxonomy makes this uncertain. Here I attempt to discover what particular characteristics of these novel habitats are hostile to native invertebrates. I chose the Collembola as a target taxon. They are a suitable group because the Australian collembolan fauna consists of a high percentage of endemic taxa, but also exotic, non-native, species. Most exotic Collembola species in Australia appear to have originated from Europe, where they occur at low densities (Fjellberg 1997, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Deutonura (Collembola: Neanuridae: Neanurinae) from North-Eastern Algeria, and Characterisation of Two Intraspecific Lineages by Their Barcodes
    Zootaxa 3920 (2): 281–290 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3920.2.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC3DAB1-9D75-4833-9610-91FC5EC3C35C A new species of Deutonura (Collembola: Neanuridae: Neanurinae) from north-eastern Algeria, and characterisation of two intraspecific lineages by their barcodes LOUIS DEHARVENG1,4, ABDELMALEK ZOUGHAILECH2, SALAH HAMRA-KROUA2 & DAVID PORCO3 1Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB - UMR 7205 - CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Sorbone Universités, 55 rue Cuvier, CP50, F-75005 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] 2Laboratoire de Biosystématique et Ecologie des Arthropodes, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université Constantine 1, Route de Ain El-Bey, 25000 Constantine, Algeria. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratoire ECODIV, Université de Rouen, Bâtiment IRESE A, Place Emile Blondel, 76821 Mont Saint Aignan Cedex, France. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Abstract A new species of Deutonura, D. zana sp. nov., is described from north-eastern Algeria. It is morphologically similar in most characters to D. deficiens meridionalis and to D. luberonensis, both members of the D. phlegraea group, differing from the former by the absence of chaeta O on head, and from the later by the separation of tubercles Di and De on Th. I. The muscular insertion pattern of the new species is figured, and suggested as a potential new character for the taxonomy of Neanurinae. Deutonura zana sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversidad De Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) En México
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, Supl. 85: S220-S231, 2014 220 Palacios-Vargas.- BiodiversidadDOI: 10.7550/rmb.32713 de Collembola Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Biodiversity of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) in Mexico José G. Palacios-Vargas Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito exterior s/n, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 México, D. F. [email protected] Resumen. Se hace una breve evaluación de la importancia del grupo en los distintos ecosistemas. Se describen los caracteres morfológicos más distintivos, así como los biotopos donde se encuentran y su tipo de alimentación. Se hace una evaluación de la biodiversidad, encontrando que existen citados más de 700 taxa, muchos de ellos a nivel genérico, de 24 familias. Se discute su distribución geográfica por provincias biogeográficas, así como la diversidad de cada estado. Se presentan cuadros con la clasificación ecológica con ejemplos mexicanos; se indican las familias y su riqueza a nivel mundial y nacional, así como la curva acumulativa de especies mexicanas por quinquenio. Palabras clave: Collembola, biodiversidad, distribución, ecología, acumulación de especies. Abstract. A brief assessment of the importance of the group in different ecosystems is done. A description of the most distinctive morphological characters, as well as biotopes where they live is included. An evaluation of their biodiversity is presented; finding that more than 700 taxa have been cited, many of them at the generic level, in 24 families. Their geographical distribution is discussed and the state richness is pointed out. Tables of ecological classification applied to Mexican species are given.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Biodiversidad De Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) En México
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Palacios-Vargas, José G. Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 85, 2014, pp. 220-231 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42529679040 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, Supl. 85: S220-S231, 2014 220 Palacios-Vargas.- BiodiversidadDOI: 10.7550/rmb.32713 de Collembola Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Biodiversity of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) in Mexico José G. Palacios-Vargas Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito exterior s/n, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 México, D. F. [email protected] Resumen. Se hace una breve evaluación de la importancia del grupo en los distintos ecosistemas. Se describen los caracteres morfológicos más distintivos, así como los biotopos donde se encuentran y su tipo de alimentación. Se hace una evaluación de la biodiversidad, encontrando que existen citados más de 700 taxa, muchos de ellos a nivel genérico, de 24 familias. Se discute su distribución geográfica por provincias biogeográficas, así como la diversidad de cada estado. Se presentan cuadros con la clasificación ecológica con ejemplos mexicanos; se indican las familias y su riqueza a nivel mundial y nacional, así como la curva acumulativa de especies mexicanas por quinquenio.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene-Rich X Chromosomes Implicate Intragenomic Conflict in the Evolution of Bizarre Genetic Systems
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.04.325340; this version posted October 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Gene-rich X chromosomes implicate intragenomic conflict in the evolution of bizarre genetic systems Noelle Anderson1, Kamil S. Jaron2, Christina N. Hodson2, Matthew B. Couger3, Jan Ševčík4, Stacy Pirro5, Laura Ross2 and Scott William Roy1,6 1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California-Merced, Merced, CA 95343 2Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Boston MA 02115 4Faculty of Science, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic 5Iridian Genomes, Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA 6Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94117 Abstract Haplodiploidy and paternal genome elimination (HD/PGE) are common in animals, having evolved at least two dozen times. HD/PGE typically evolves from male heterogamety (i.e., systems with X chromosomes), however why X chromosomes are important for the evolution of HD/PGE remains debated. The Haploid Viability Hypothesis argues that X chromosomes promote the evolution of male haploidy by facilitating purging recessive deleterious mutations. The Intragenomic Conflict Hypothesis instead argues that X chromosomes promote the evolution of male haploidy due to conflicts with autosomes over sex ratios and transmission. To test these hypotheses, we studied lineages that combine germline PGE with XX/X0 sex determination (gPGE+X systems).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/07/2021 07:28:06AM Via Free Access - 152 P
    Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 64 (3) 151-162 (1994) SPB Academie Publishing bv, The Hague A standardized description of European Sminthuridae (Collembola, Symphypleona), 2: review of four species of the genera Allacma and Spatulosminthurus Pierre Nayrolles Laboratoire de Zoologie, Ecobiologie des Arthropodes édaphiques, UPR CNRS 90 14, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cédex, France Keywords: Collembola, Symphypleona, Allacma, Spatulosminthurus, taxonomy, chaetotaxy, Europe Abstract et al., 1970), thick cuticle with a particular archi- tecture, and well-developed tracheal system with According to our standard of the appendicular chaetotaxy, the chiasmata at the forelegs. Moreover, Betsch & following species are redescribed: Allacma fusca (Linné, 1758), Waller (in press) point out the presence of a secon- Allacma gallica (Carl, 1899), Spatulosminthurus lesnei (Carl, dary (ontogenetic) neochaetosis on the great abdo- 1899), and Spatulosminthurus betschi Nayrolles, 1990. men as a synapomorphy of these three genera (like- ly the consequence of an ontogenetic delay in- The Résumé volving originally primary setae). following putative evolved characters can be added: setae (AD)iO, (AD)i+ 1, and (AD)i + 2 small and slender Nous redécrivons, d’après la standardisation donnée pour la chétotaxie appendiculaire, les espèces suivantes: Allacma fusca on a large base, and mucronal anterior lamella (Linné, 1758), Allacma gallica (Cari, 1899), Spatulosminthurus double. lesnei (Cari, 1899) et Spatulosminthurus betschi Nayrolles, I recall the abbreviations which correspond 1990. neither to setal symbols nor to the legend of the chaetotaxic tables; these were accurately explained in my first Introduction paper. abd. = abdomen This is the second part of a series dealing with the ad.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2009___________ I MUNIS ENTOMOLOGY & ZOOLOGY Ankara / Turkey II _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2009___________ Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology publishes a wide variety of papers on all aspects of Entomology and Zoology from all of the world, including mainly studies on systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, fauna, biogeography, biodiversity, ecology, morphology, behavior, conservation, paleobiology and other aspects are appropriate topics for papers submitted to Munis Entomology & Zoology. Submission of Manuscripts: Works published or under consideration elsewhere (including on the internet) will not be accepted. At first submission, one double spaced hard copy (text and tables) with figures (may not be original) must be sent to the Editors, Dr. Hüseyin Özdikmen for publication in MEZ. All manuscripts should be submitted as Word file or PDF file in an e-mail attachment. If electronic submission is not possible due to limitations of electronic space at the sending or receiving ends, unavailability of e-mail, etc., we will accept “hard” versions, in triplicate, accompanied by an electronic version stored in a floppy disk, a CD-ROM. Review Process: When submitting manuscripts, all authors provides the name, of at least three qualified experts (they also provide their address, subject fields and e-mails). Then, the editors send to experts to review the papers. The review process should normally be completed within 45-60 days. After reviewing papers by reviwers: Rejected papers are discarded. For accepted papers, authors are asked to modify their papers according to suggestions of the reviewers and editors. Final versions of manuscripts and figures are needed in a digital format.
    [Show full text]
  • Collembola, Symphypleona, Sminthurus, Chaetotaxy, New Species, Taxonomy, Ontogeny
    tot de Dierkunde 64 215-237 Bijdragen , (4) (1995) SPB Academie Publishing b\, The Hague A standardized description of European Sminthuridae (Collembola, 3: of seven of Sminthurus Symphypleona), description species , including four new to science Pierre Nayrolles Laboratoire de Zoologie, Ecobiologie des Arthropodes édaphiques, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex, France Keywords: Collembola, Symphypleona, Sminthurus, chaetotaxy, new species, taxonomy, ontogeny, France, Spain Abstract tion proposed in the first paper (Nayrolles, 1993a) will be used here again. The following three species are redescribed: Sminthurus viridis Sminthurus Latreille, 1804 is the most ancient (Linnaeus, 1758), Sminthurus nigromaculatus Tullberg, 1871, genus of Symphypleona. The genus was hetero- and Sminthurus multipunctatus Schäffer, 1896. Four new spe- geneous, and progressively species were transferred cies are described from France and Spain: Sminthurus bour- to different review of genera. The last the genuswas geoisin. sp., Sminthurus bozoulensis n. sp., Sminthurus leuco- by Betsch & Betsch-Pinot in 1984. Within the sub- melanus n.sp.,and Sminthurus hispanicus n. sp. The importance of the ontogeny of chaetotaxyis stressed. Indeed, not all species family Sminthurinae, these authors distinguished acquire the secondary chaetotaxy in the same instar, and for three genera sharing the character "presence of a these characters the most informative instar is not the adult but of setae". These Allacma pair postantennal genera, the third juvenile instar. The study of such characters involves Borner, 1906, Spatulosminthurus Betsch & Betsch- the clustering of similar characters. A short discussion is given and Sminthurus about this issue (selection of characters and clustering criteria). Pinot, 1984, Latreille, 1804, sensu Betsch & Betsch-Pinot, 1984 were well established, because each one was defined by evolved charac- Résumé ters, making it monophyletic.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Abundance of Springtails (Insecta: Collembola) in Native and Restored Tallgrass Prairies
    Am. Midl. Nat. 139:235±242 Diversity and Abundance of Springtails (Insecta: Collembola) in Native and Restored Tallgrass Prairies RAYMOND H. BRAND AND CHRISTOPHER P. DUNN The Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, Illinois 60532-1293 ABSTRACT.ÐThis study suggests that heterotrophic components of prairie ecosystems can be used with autotrophic components to assess the degree to which a restored prairie ap- proaches the biotic complexity of a native prairie. Springtails (Collembola) were collected from prairie vegetation and litter samples from 13 prairie sites (seven native and six restored) located in southwestern Michigan and northeastern Illinois. The diversity and abundance of these insects and the plant and litter biomass were compared. There were 27 different taxa of springtails in the 225 samples collected. Native prairies had the greatest species richness with 26 species. The oldest restored prairie had 17 species. Three common species were Hypogastrura boletivora, Isotoma viridis, and Lepidocyrtus pallidus. Neanura muscorum, Xenylla grisea, and Pseuduosinella rolfsi were rare. Tomocerus ¯avescens was found primarily in native prairies with only one occurrence in the oldest restored prairie in this study. Native prairies and restored prairies of 17 and 24 yr did not differ signi®cantly in numbers of springtails. Differences in springtail numbers did occur, however, between restored prairies of ,6yr and native prairies, and between younger (,6 yr) and older (17 and 26 yr) restored prairies. An analysis of plant and litter biomass indicated signi®cant differences among the prairie sites sampled. These results suggest that all components of the prairie ecosystem are useful for making restoration management decisions.
    [Show full text]