DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Release Draft Restoration Plan and Programmatic Environmental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Public Release Draft Restoration Plan and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Restoration Resulting from the Kalamazoo River Natural Resource Damage Assessment Photo credit: Lisa Williams, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Photo credit: USFWS National Conservation Training Center (USFWS). Image Library. Prepared for: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Michigan Attorney General, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Prepared by: Abt Associates/Stratus Consulting Inc. PO Box 4059 Boulder, CO 80306-4059 (303) 381-8000 August 2015 SC13483 Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ xi List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................... xiii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... S-1 Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Overview of the Kalamazoo River NRDA .......................................................... 1-2 1.2 Environmental Laws and Regulations ................................................................. 1-5 1.2.1 NEPA ....................................................................................................... 1-7 1.2.1.1 Additional supporting NEPA documents ................................. 1-8 1.2.1.2 Public participation .................................................................. 1-8 1.2.2 CERCLA .................................................................................................. 1-9 1.2.2.1 Superfund cleanup .................................................................... 1-9 1.2.2.2 NRDA ..................................................................................... 1-13 1.2.2.3 Working with response agencies and potentially responsible parties .................................................................. 1-16 1.2.2.4 Settlements and OU1 RP/EA ................................................. 1-17 1.3 Purpose and Need .............................................................................................. 1-17 1.4 Administrative Record ....................................................................................... 1-18 1.5 Document Organization ..................................................................................... 1-18 Chapter 2 Description of the Proposed Action .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Proposed Action ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 General Restoration Strategy and Objectives ...................................................... 2-3 2.3 Project Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................... 2-6 2.4 Restoration Project Monitoring and Performance Criteria .................................. 2-6 2.4.1 Performance criteria ................................................................................. 2-9 2.4.2 Adaptive management ............................................................................. 2-9 2.4.3 Monitoring parameters ........................................................................... 2-11 2.4.4 Reporting requirements .......................................................................... 2-11 2.4.5 Long-term stewardship .......................................................................... 2-12 SC13483 Contents (Public Release Draft, 8/2015) Chapter 3 Development and Analysis of Alternatives ...................................................... 3-1 3.1 Restoration Project Categories ............................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Aquatic habitat restoration ....................................................................... 3-2 3.1.1.1 Techniques for instream restoration ......................................... 3-3 3.1.1.2 Techniques for stream bank restoration ................................... 3-9 3.1.1.3 Techniques for reintroduction and enhancement of native aquatic species ............................................................. 3-12 3.1.1.4 Techniques for controlling invasive aquatic species .............. 3-13 3.1.2 Riparian and wetland habitat restoration ............................................... 3-14 3.1.2.1 Techniques for riparian and wetland restoration .................... 3-18 3.1.2.2 Techniques for reintroduction and enhancement of native plants ............................................................................ 3-19 3.1.2.3 Techniques for reintroduction and enhancement of native animals ......................................................................... 3-20 3.1.2.4 Techniques for controlling invasive species .......................... 3-20 3.1.3 Barrier removal ...................................................................................... 3-22 3.1.3.1 Techniques for dam removal .................................................. 3-24 3.1.3.1.1 Removal of the Otsego City Dam ........................ 3-26 3.1.3.1.2 Removal of the Otsego Dam ................................ 3-29 3.1.3.2 Techniques for small barrier removal and replacement ......... 3-30 3.1.3.3 Techniques for other fish passage modifications ................... 3-31 3.1.4 Habitat conservation .............................................................................. 3-34 3.1.4.1 Techniques for habitat conservation ...................................... 3-35 3.2 Alternatives Carried Forward for Analysis ........................................................ 3-35 3.2.1 Alternative A: No Action Alternative .................................................... 3-35 3.2.2 Alternative B: Restoration of the Kalamazoo River corridor within the Kalamazoo River Superfund Site .................. 3-36 3.2.3 Alternative C: Restoration within the Kalamazoo River watershed ..................................................................................... 3-37 3.3 Identification of Preferred Alternative ............................................................... 3-37 3.4 Alternatives Not Considered for Detailed Analysis ........................................... 3-38 Chapter 4 Environmental Setting/Affected Environment................................................ 4-1 4.1 Water Resources and Water Quality .................................................................... 4-3 4.1.1 Water resources ........................................................................................ 4-3 4.1.2 Water quality ............................................................................................ 4-6 4.2 Geologic Resources and Sediment Quality .......................................................... 4-8 4.3 Biological Resources ........................................................................................... 4-9 4.3.1 Fish ......................................................................................................... 4-10 4.3.2 Aquatic invertebrates ............................................................................. 4-14 Page iv SC13483 Contents (Public Release Draft, 8/2015) 4.3.3 Wildlife .................................................................................................. 4-17 4.3.3.1 Birds ....................................................................................... 4-17 4.3.3.2 Amphibians and reptiles ......................................................... 4-18 4.3.3.3 Mammals ................................................................................ 4-18 4.3.4 Vegetation .............................................................................................. 4-18 4.3.5 Federally listed species .......................................................................... 4-19 4.4 Air Quality ......................................................................................................... 4-21 4.5 Socioeconomic Resources and Environmental Justice ...................................... 4-22 4.5.1 Socioeconomic resources ....................................................................... 4-22 4.5.2 Environmental justice ............................................................................ 4-22 4.6 Recreation and Land Use ................................................................................... 4-22 4.7 Noise .................................................................................................................. 4-24 4.8 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................. 4-25 Chapter 5 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Characteristics of Potential Impacts ..................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Water Resources and Water Quality .................................................................... 5-2 5.2.1 Alternative C (Preferred Alternative) ...................................................... 5-2 5.2.1.1 Aquatic habitat restoration ......................................................
Recommended publications
  • Kalamazoo River Draft Supplemental Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment

    Kalamazoo River Draft Supplemental Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment

    Kalamazoo River Draft Supplemental Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan Department of Attorney General April 2021 Regulatory Notes An Environmental Assessment is prepared to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The NEPA is the Nation’s premier environmental law that guarantees every American the right to review, comment, and participate in planning of federal decisions that may affect the human environment. The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) on July 16, 2020 issued in the Federal Register a final rule updating its regulations for the NEPA (85 Fed. Reg. 43304, July 16, 2020). On January 20, 2021, President Joseph R. Biden issued an Executive Order entitled “Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis” that requires agencies to immediately review promulgation of Federal regulations and other actions during the previous four years to determine consistency with Section 1 of the Executive Order. This may include the CEQ reviewing the July 16, 2020 update to the NEPA regulations. The goals of the July 2020 amendments to the NEPA regulations were to reduce paperwork and delays and to promote better decisions consistent with the policy set forth in section 101 of the NEPA. The effective date of these amended regulations was September 14, 2020. However, for actions that began before September 14th, such as this one, agencies may continue with the regulations in effect before September 14th because applying the amended regulations would cause delays to the ongoing process.
  • Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan

    Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan

    Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan Prepared by the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council March 2011 (updated August 2015) This Nonpoint Source Pollution Control project has been funded in part through the Michigan Nonpoint Source Program by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #2006-0148 to the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council for the Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan. The contents of the document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Recommended Citation: Kalamazoo River Watershed Council. 2011. Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan. Prepared for the Michigan Nonpoint Source Program (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and the United States Environmental Protection Agency). ii Acknowledgments This Watershed Management Plan is the culmination of several years of work on the part of the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council and particularly our Coordinator and the lead author of this report, Jeffrey A. Spoelstra. Jeff attended innumerable meetings in the community, studied dozens of reports, and assimilated and compiled the information presented here. The Plan was greatly enhanced by the technical and scientific support of Kieser & Associates, LLC, who contributed with spatial data analysis, map production, and modeling. We would also like to acknowledge our many partners in the quest to improve watershed protection and management in the Kalamazoo River watershed. Funding to prepare this Plan was provided primarily through a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Section 319 grant administered by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ; also known as MDNRE during the report preparation).
  • The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians

    The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians

    Keeper’s of the Fire: A history and introduction to the community through text & images John N. Low, JD, Ph.D. , (Pokagon Band Potawatomi). Assistant Professor, Department of Comparative Studies, Ohio State University – Newark 1 Bozho Nikanek! Hello Friends and Welcome! We are the Pokégnek Bodéwadmik (Pokagon Band of Potawatomi), the Neshnabek (the Original People). Through this tribal history I invite you to learn about who we are, where we have been, what we are about and the future before us. There are many teachings and many ways – our traditions tell us no one path is better than another. I have tried to present the information about our community in a good and humble way. If I have not succeeded, I ask for your patience and forgiveness. I thank the Creator, my ancestors and my elders for the opportunity to share this with you. I dedicate this to our children, who represent our greatest hope and resource for the future. Igwein! (I am not deserving but am very grateful)! Wé wé na (Thank you)! 2 Who Are the Potawatomi? The identity of the Potawatomi, as with most every Native peoples in North America, is often stereotyped by outsiders. Through time, we have remained a proud and productive tribal community, and continue to hold a unique place in society. We are the descendants of the allied Potawatomi villages located along the St. Joseph, Paw Paw, and Kalamazoo Rivers in what is now southwest Michigan and northwest Indiana. Many of the cities and streets in the Michiana area have Potawatomi names attached to them.
  • Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan

    Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan

    Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan Prepared by the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council March 2011 This Nonpoint Source Pollution Control project has been funded in part through the Michigan Nonpoint Source Program by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #2006-0148 to the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council for the Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan. The contents of the document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Recommended Citation: Kalamazoo River Watershed Council. 2011. Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan. Prepared for the Michigan Nonpoint Source Program (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and the United States Environmental Protection Agency). ii Acknowledgments This Watershed Management Plan is the culmination of several years of work on the part of the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council and particularly our Coordinator and the lead author of this report, Jeffrey A. Spoelstra. Jeff attended innumerable meetings in the community, studied dozens of reports, and assimilated and compiled the information presented here. The Plan was greatly enhanced by the technical and scientific support of Kieser & Associates, LLC, who contributed with spatial data analysis, map production, and modeling. We would also like to acknowledge our many partners in the quest to improve watershed protection and management in the Kalamazoo River watershed. Funding to prepare this Plan was provided primarily through a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Section 319 grant administered by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ; also known as MDNRE during the report preparation). Janelle Hohm and Julia Kirkwood of the MDEQ were especially helpful in providing guidance and support.