C-. LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

C-. LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA LAKE COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT FINAL Prepared by Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. MAY 1991 environmental engineers, scientists, M.. planners, & rnonogernent cmsultonts c-. LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. MAY 1991 CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Background 1.2 Report Purposes and Contents 2.0 DATA SOURCES 2-1 Lake County Neighboring Counties Participating Cities and Towns Non-Participating Cities Lake County Water Authority (LCtJA) United States Geological Survey (USGS) United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS) Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fm) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) 3.0 HYDR0UX;IC AND HYDRAULIC BACKGROUND 3-1 Major Basins 3.1.1 Oklawaha River 3.1.2 Withlacoochee River 3.1.3 Wekiva River 3.1.4 Kissimmee River 3.1.5 St. Johns River Hydrologic Boundaries Topography Aerial Photography Soils Rainfall Stage and Discharge Floodplains and Floodways Land Use and Growth Trends Regional Aquifer Characteristics Inventory of Major Stomter Conveyance Structures 4.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS 4-1 4.1 Lake County 4.2 Cities and Towns 4.3 Federal and State CONTENTS (contents) Section Page 5.0 WATER QUALITY 5-1 5.1 General 5.2 Best Management Practices (BMPs) 5.2.1 Structural BMP Alternatives 5.2.2 Comparison of Structural BMPs 5.2.3 Design Criteria for Preferred Structural BMPS 5.2.4 Pollutant Removal Efficiencies 5.3 Regional vs. Onsite Deployment of Structural BMPs 5.4 Water Quality Evaluations 5.4.1 Existing Lake County Monitoring 5.4.2 Trophic State Index 5.4.3 Stormwater Pollutant Loadings 5.4.4 Failing Septic Tank Impacts 5.4.5 Average Annual Non-Point Pollution Loads 5.5 Summary 6.0 PROBLEM AREAS 6.1 General 6.1.1 Water Quantity (Flooding) 6.1.2 Water Quality 6.2 Problem Area Identification and Evaluations 6.2.1 Water Quantity Problem Areas 6.2.2 Water Quality Problem Areas 6.2.3 Non-Problem Facilities 7.0 COMPUTER MODEL COMPARISONS 7.1 Water Quantity Models 7.1.1 Water Quantity Model Comparison Items 7.1.2 Available Water Quantity Models 7.1.3 Water Quantity Model Recommendations 7.2 Water Quality Models 8.0 LEVELS OF SEKVICE 8.1 Water Quantity 8.2 Water Quality 8.3 Summary 8.4 Prioritization CONTENTS (continued) Section Xe 9.1 on-Structural Improvements 9.1.1 Goals, Objectives, and Policies 9.1.2 Stormwater Management Regulations and Ordinances 9.1.3 Maintenance Practices 9.2 Structural Improvements 9.2.1 Problem Area Improvements 9.2.2 Unknown Problem Area Improvements 9.2.3 Additional Stormwater Management Program Needs 9.3 Prioritization 9.4 Additional Program Needs APPENDICES APPENDIX A - LAKE COUNTY'S STORMKATER SUB-ELEMENT, CHAPTER V1-C, OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX B - DATA o Hydrologic Boundary Map o Stormwater Facility Inventory by SubBasin o Soils by Sub-Basin o Land Use by Sub-Basin APPENDIX C - DRAFT STORMNRTER MANAG- ORDINANCE (Provided to Lake County under separate cover) iii LIST OF TABLES Table Page Design Storms Recommendations for the Major Basins Rainfall Summary for Lake County Area, Florida Estimated Water Quality Based on Historic Storms USGS Lake Gages in the Study Area USGS Stream Gages in the Study Area USGS Well Gages in the Study Area Imperviousness by Land Use Category CDM vs. County Land Use Categories Monitored Wet Detention Basin Efficiencies Total-P and Dissolved P Summary Summary of Lake Water Quality Monitoring Data Sumrnary of Lake County Trophic State Index Analysis Summary of Lake County Land Use and Hydrological Soils Group Comparison of Average Annual Total-P Loading Factors for Urban Land Uses: Occoquan Watershed Monitoring Study vs. NURP National Statistics Summary of Non-Point Pollution Loading Factors by Hydrologic Soils Group Event Mean Concentrations for the Orlando Metro Areawide Water Quality Study (ECFRPC, 1978) Event Mean Concentrations and Impervious Percentages for the Tampa Bay Study (CDM, 1984) Event Mean Concentrations and Impervious Percentages for the Manatee County Southeast Area Study (CDM, 1985) Water Quantity Problem Areas by Sub-Basin Water Quality Problem Areas by Sub-Basin Water Quantity Model Sceening Matrix Recommended Maintenance Frequencies by Facility Type Annual Maintenance Costs Problem Area Summary Conceptual Probable Costs for Retrofit Treatment Facilities Lake County Stomwater Master Plan Basin Studies Cost Estimate Priorities for Stormwater Master Planning by Basin Stomwater Management Program Probable Cost Summary LIST OF FIGURES Following Fiaure Page Major Basins Detailed Topographic Coverage Generalized SCS Soils Mean Annual, 24-Hour Maximum Rainfall for Northeast Florida, Inches 10-Year, 24-Hour Maximum Rainfall for Northeast Florida, Inches 25-Year, 24-Hour Maximum Rainfall for Northeast Florida, Inches 100-Year, 24-Hour Maximum Rainfall for Northeast Florida, Inches 25-Year, 96-Hour Maximum Rainfall for Northeast Florida, Inches Rainfall Gages Adapted from SJRWMD TP-88 USGS Lake Gages USGS Stream Gages High Growth Areas Groundwater Characteristics Wet Detention Basin Settling Curves Onsite vs. Regional BMPs Typical Multi-Purpose Facility Typical Swale Mean Concentration 1985-1990: Total-P Mean Concentration 1985-1990: Total-N Mean Concentration 1985-1990: Secchi Mean Concentration 1985-1990: CHL-A Average Annual Load: Total-P Average Annual Load: Total-N Average Annual Load: Lead Average Annual Load: Zinc Average Annual "Per Acre" Load: Total-P Average Annual "Per Acre" Load: Total-N Average Annual "Per Acre" Load: Lead Average Annual "Per Acre" Load: Zinc Water Quantity Problem Areas by Sub-Basin Water Quality Problem Areas by Sub-Basin Water Quantity Levels of Service Water Quality Levels of Service 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND In May 1990, Lake County initiated a phased Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) to manage surface and groundwater resources in the County. Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. was selected to perform services related to this program. The main purposes of the County's overall Stormwater Management Program are identified as the following: 1. Build a stormwater management system data-base and information management system which will inventory, locate and describe existing stormwater management systems, hydrologic basins, and other related hydrologic parameters in Lake County. 2. Evaluate existing stormwater management system ordinances, maintenance conditions, and practices. 3. Develop and apply a stormwater management computer model to simulate stormwater runoff of various frequencies under existing and future planned land use conditions. 4. Analyze the capability of the existing stormwater system to accommodate present and future stormwater flows. 5. Assess the magnitude of existing and anticipated future stormwater problems within the County and prioritize those problems relative to their need for attention. 6. Establish desired level of service criteria for the various components of the stormwater management system. 7. Evaluate alternative management plans to meet the desired service level based on existing and future anticipated deficiencies identified through data collection and modeling. 8. Develop cost estimates for needed improvements. 9. Develop a Stormwater Management System Capital Improvement Plan based on identified system improvement needs and a prioritized implementation schedule. 10. Identify and, if required, develop alternative funding methodologies, including a stormwater utility, necessary to fund stormwater management system capital improvements, operations and maintenance and administration. 11. Meet the planning requirements of the Stormwater Sub-Element of Chapter 95-5, Florida Administrative Code (FAC). 1.2 REPORT PURPOSES AND CONTENTS This report presents results from Tasks 1 and 2 of the SWMP: Data Collection and Preliminary Needs Assessment. Within these two tasks, the foundation for completing the 11 overall purposes of the SWMP has been formed. For this report, stormwater-related data were collected, evaluated for adequacy and quality, and utilized to establish levels of detail and priorities for subsequent SWMP tasks. In addition, conceptual Capital Improvement Program (CIP) probable cost estimates were made for facilities to mitigate known stormwater quantity problems, and to provide for the treatment of stormwater in areas where such facilities do not exist. This report also presents the recommended levels of service and detail to meet the requirements of Chapter 95-5, FAC, and the additional future tasks which will be required for Lake County to complete the overall Stormwater Management Program objectives. 2.0 DATA SOURCES Presented below is a summary of the numerous entities and agencies which retain the stomter data and previous reports pertinent to the Lake County stomter management system. These entities and agencies were contacted to obtain or reference existing data and previous reports. The pertinent data and reports are referenced by the respective entity which retains them. LAKE COUNTY Departments within the Lake County government infrastructure were contacted to evaluate and document the County's stormwater management resources and existing data and reports. The information provided by Lake County personnel is presented below:
Recommended publications
  • Collier Miami-Dade Palm Beach Hendry Broward Glades St
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission F L O R ID A 'S T U R N P IK E er iv R ee m Lakewood Park m !( si is O K L D INDRIO ROAD INDRIO RD D H I N COUNTY BCHS Y X I L A I E O W L H H O W G Y R I D H UCIE BLVD ST L / S FT PRCE ILT SRA N [h G Fort Pierce Inlet E 4 F N [h I 8 F AVE "Q" [h [h A K A V R PELICAN YACHT CLUB D E . FORT PIERCE CITY MARINA [h NGE AVE . OKEECHOBEE RA D O KISSIMMEE RIVER PUA NE 224 ST / CR 68 D R !( A D Fort Pierce E RD. OS O H PIC R V R T I L A N N A M T E W S H N T A E 3 O 9 K C A R-6 A 8 O / 1 N K 0 N C 6 W C W R 6 - HICKORY HAMMOCK WMA - K O R S 1 R L S 6 R N A E 0 E Lake T B P U Y H D A K D R is R /NW 160TH E si 68 ST. O m R H C A me MIDWAY RD. e D Ri Jernigans Pond Palm Lake FMA ver HUTCHINSON ISL . O VE S A t C . T I IA EASY S N E N L I u D A N.E. 120 ST G c I N R i A I e D South N U R V R S R iv I 9 I V 8 FLOR e V ESTA DR r E ST.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Perspective on the Kissimmee River Restoration Project
    ing of 14 km of river channel, and removal of two water­ An Historical control structures and associated levees. Restoration of the Kissimmee River ecosystem will result in the reestablish­ ment of 104 km2 of river-floodplain ecosystem, including Perspective on the 70 km of river channel and 11,000 ha of wetland habitat, which is expected to benefit over 320 species of fish and Kissimmee River wildlife. Restoration Project Background he Kissimmee River basin is located in central Florida Tbetween the city of Orlando and lake Okeechobee Joseph W. Koebel, Jr.1 within the Coastal Lowlands physiographic province. It con­ sists of a 4229-km2 upper basin, which includes Lake Kis­ Abstract simmee and 18 smaller lakes ranging in size from a few hec­ tares to 144 km2, and a 1,963-km2 lower basin, which This paper reviews the events leading to the channeliza­ includes the tributary watersheds (excluding Lake Istok­ tion of the Kissimmee River, the physical, hydrologic, and poga) of the Kissimmee River between lake Kissimmee and biological effects of channelization, and the restoration lake Okeechobee. The physiography of the region includes movement. Between 1962 and 1971, in order to provide the Osceola and Okeechobee Plains and the Lake Wales flood control for central and southern florida, the 166 ridge of the Wicomico shore (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers km-Iong meandering Kissimmee River was transformed 1992). into a 90 km-Iong, 10 meter-deep, 100 meter-wide canal. Prior to channelization, the Kissimmee River meandered Channelization and transformation of the Kissimmee River approximately 166 km within a 1.5-3-km-wide floodplain.
    [Show full text]
  • LOWRP Draft PIR/EIS Annex C
    COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN LAKE OKEECHOBEE WATERSHED RESTORATION PROJECT DRAFT INTEGRATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT July 2018 Annex C Annex C Draft Project Operating Manual ANNEX C DRAFT PROJECT OPERATING MANUAL LOWRP Draft PIR and EIS July 2018 Annex C-i Annex C Draft Project Operating Manual This page intentionally left blank. LOWRP Draft PIR and EIS July 2018 Annex C-ii Annex C Draft Project Operating Manual Table of Contents C DRAFT PROJECT OPERATING MANUAL .................................................................... C-1 C.1 General Project Purposes, Goals, Objectives, and Benefits ................................... C-1 C.2 Project Features .................................................................................................. C-1 C.2.1 Existing Features ..................................................................................... C-2 C.2.2 Proposed Features .................................................................................. C-3 C.3 Project Relationships ........................................................................................... C-6 C.4 Major Constraints ................................................................................................ C-7 C.4.1 Paradise run ............................................................................................ C-8 C.4.2 Existing Legal Users, Levels of Flood Damage Reduction, and Water Quality ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Plan for Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Tributaries (EPKOET)
    Environmental Plan for Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Tributaries (EPKOET) Stephanie Bazan, Larissa Gaul, Vanessa Huber, Nicole Paladino, Emily Tulsky April 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY…………………...………………………………………..4 2. MISSION STATEMENT…………………………………....…………………………………7 3. GOVERNANCE……………………………………………………………………...………...8 4. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL POLICIES…………………………………………..…..10 5. PROBLEMS AND GOALS…..……………………………………………………………....12 6. SCHEDULE…………………………………....……………………………………………...17 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………………………....17 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………..……………………....18 2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure A. Map of the Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Watershed…………………………...4 Figure B. Phosphorus levels surrounding the Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Watershed…..5 Figure C. Before and after backfilling of the Kissimmee river C-38 canal……………………….6 Figure D. Algae bloom along the St. Lucie River………………………………………………...7 Figure E. Florida’s Five Water Management Districts………………………………………........8 Figure F. Three main aquifer systems in southern Florida……………………………………....14 Figure G. Effect of levees on the watershed………………………………………...…………...15 Figure H. Algal bloom in the KOE watershed…………………………………………...………15 Figure I: Canal systems south of Lake Okeechobee……………………………………………..16 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Primary Problems in the Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades watershed……………...13 Table 2: Schedule for EPKOET……………………………………………………………….…18 3 1. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY The Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades watershed is an area of about
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area
    Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) September 5, 2019 St. Cloud, Florida 1 Agenda 1. Introductions and Background……... Don Medellin, SFWMD 2. SJRWMD MFLs Priority List……Andrew Sutherland, SJRWMD 3. SWFWMD MFLs Priority List..Doug Leeper, SWFWMD 4. SFWMD MFLs Priority List……Don Medellin, SFWMD 5. Stakeholder comments 6. Adjourn 2 Statutory Directive for MFLs Water management districts or DEP must establish MFLs that set the limit or level… “…at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area.” Section 373.042(1), Florida Statutes 3 Statutory Directive for Reservations Water management districts may… “…reserve from use by permit applicants, water in such locations and quantities, and for such seasons of the year, as in its judgment may be required for the protection of fish and wildlife or the public health and safety.” Section 373.223(4), Florida Statutes 4 District Priority Lists and Schedules Meet Statutory and Rule Requirements ▪ Prioritization is based on the importance of waters to the State or region, and the existence of or potential for significant harm ▪ Includes waters experiencing or reasonably expected to experience adverse impacts ▪ MFLs the districts will voluntarily subject to independent scientific peer review are identified ▪ Proposed reservations are identified ▪ Listed water bodies that have the potential to be affected by withdrawals in an adjacent water management district are identified 5 2019 Draft Priority List and Schedule ▪ Annual priority list and schedule required by statute for each district ▪ Presented to respective District Governing Boards for approval ▪ Submitted to DEP for review by Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: the Everglades to the 1920S Introduction
    Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s Introduction The Everglades is a vast wetland, 40 to 50 miles wide and 100 miles long. Prior to the twentieth century, the Everglades occupied most of the Florida peninsula south of Lake Okeechobee.1 Originally about 4,000 square miles in extent, the Everglades included extensive sawgrass marshes dotted with tree islands, wet prairies, sloughs, ponds, rivers, and creeks. Since the 1880s, the Everglades has been drained by canals, compartmentalized behind levees, and partially transformed by agricultural and urban development. Although water depths and flows have been dramatically altered and its spatial extent reduced, the Everglades today remains the only subtropical ecosystem in the United States and one of the most extensive wetland systems in the world. Everglades National Park embraces about one-fourth of the original Everglades plus some ecologically distinct adjacent areas. These adjacent areas include slightly elevated uplands, coastal mangrove forests, and bays, notably Florida Bay. Everglades National Park has been recognized as a World Heritage Site, an International Biosphere Re- serve, and a Wetland of International Importance. In this work, the term Everglades or Everglades Basin will be reserved for the wetland ecosystem (past and present) run- ning between the slightly higher ground to the east and west. The term South Florida will be used for the broader area running from the Kississimee River Valley to the toe of the peninsula.2 Early in the twentieth century, a magazine article noted of the Everglades that “the region is not exactly land, and it is not exactly water.”3 The presence of water covering the land to varying depths through all or a major portion of the year is the defining feature of the Everglades.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update and Integrated
    Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Draft Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update and Integrated Environmental Assessment 23 July 2018 Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan DRAFT 23 July 2018 The attached Master Plan for the Okeechobee Waterway Project is in compliance with ER 1130-2-550 Project Operations RECREATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURES and EP 1130-2-550 Project Operations RECREATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE POLICIES and no further action is required. Master Plan is approved. Jason A. Kirk, P.E. Colonel, U.S. Army District Commander i Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT [This page intentionally left blank] ii Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update PROPOSED FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY MASTER PLAN UPDATE GLADES, HENDRY, MARTIN, LEE, OKEECHOBEE, AND PALM BEACH COUNTIES 1. PROPOSED ACTION: The proposed Master Plan Update documents current improvements and stewardship of natural resources in the project area. The proposed Master Plan Update includes current recreational features and land use within the project area, while also including the following additions to the Okeechobee Waterway (OWW) Project: a. Conversion of the abandoned campground at Moore Haven West to a Wildlife Management Area (WMA) with access to the Lake Okeechobee Scenic Trail (LOST) and day use area. b. Closure of the W.P. Franklin swim beach, while maintaining the picnic and fishing recreational areas with potential addition of canoe/kayak access. This would entail removing buoys and swimming signs and discontinuing sand renourishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 U.S
    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Appendix 1 U.S. Geological Survey Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Office of Agricultural Water Policy Open-File Report 2014−1257 81°45' 81°30' 81°15' 81°00' 80°45' 524 Jim Creek 1 Lake Hart 501 520 LAKE 17 ORANGE 417 Lake Mary Jane Saint Johns River 192 Boggy Creek 535 Shingle Creek 519 429 Lake Preston 95 17 East Lake Tohopekaliga Saint Johns River 17 Reedy Creek 28°15' Lake Lizzie Lake Winder Saint Cloud Canal ! Lake Tohopekaliga Alligator Lake 4 Saint Johns River EXPLANATION Big Bend Swamp Brick Lake Generalized land use classifications 17 for study purposes: Crabgrass Creek Land irrigated Lake Russell Lake Mattie Lake Gentry Row crops Lake Washington Peppers−184 acresLake Lowery Lake Marion Creek 192 Potatoes−3,322 acres 27 Lake Van Cantaloupes−633 acres BREVARD Lake Alfred Eggplant−151 acres All others−57 acres Lake Henry ! UnverifiedLake Haines crops−33 acres Lake Marion Saint Johns River Jane Green Creek LakeFruit Rochelle crops Cypress Lake Blueberries−41 acres Citrus groves−10,861 acres OSCEOLA Peaches−67 acresLake Fannie Lake Hamilton Field Crops Saint Johns River Field corn−292 acres Hay−234 acres Lake Hatchineha Rye grass−477 acres Lake Howard Lake 17 Seeds−619 acres 28°00' Ornamentals and grasses Ornamentals−240 acres Tree nurseries−27 acres Lake Annie Sod farms−5,643Lake Eloise acres 17 Pasture (improved)−4,575 acres Catfish Creek Land not irrigated Abandoned groves−4,916 acres Pasture−259,823 acres Lake Rosalie Water source Groundwater−18,351 acres POLK Surface water−9,106 acres Lake Kissimmee Lake Jackson Water Management Districts irrigated land totals Weohyakapka Creek Tiger Lake South Florida Groundwater−18,351 acres 441 Surface water−7,596 acres Lake Marian St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake County Vacation Guide - 3
    LAKETourism & Business RelationsCOUNTYffloridalor ida Inside: (page 2) FLORIDA’S PLAYGROUND (page 14) OUTDOOR LOVER’S DREAM (page 22) ADVENTURERS & EXPLORERS Table of Contents Introduction to Lake County . 2 Fact Sheet . .4 Small-town charm . 6 Boating & Waterways . 10 Parks & Recreation . 14 Hometown festivals. .26 Wildlife & Wildflowers . 32 Bed & breakfast inns. .34 Accommodations . 36 Restaurants . .40 Visitor Services . .50 Introduction to Lake County - 2 Lake Introduction to Florida’s Natural Playground The natural wonder of Lake County is just the beginning stone’s throw from Florida’s coastal beaches and theme parks, Lake County offers visitors a more simple and natural view of “Old Florida.” AInstead of touting the largest coaster or grandest mall, Lake County’s greatest assets are courtesy of Mother Nature. Home to more than 1,000 freshwater lakes and rivers, there is no doubt how this natural wonderland received its moniker. Other Lake County superlatives include the ridges of peaks and valleys unseen in any other area of Florida and endless acres of preserves to include access to three state parks, one state forest, one national wildlife refuge and one national forest. Lake County Vacation Guide - 3 Long & Scott Farms produces Zellwood Sweet Corn, pickle cucumbers, red & green cabbage and other produce. In addition, the farm features a country market, seasonal corn mazes, hayrides and farm tours (352-383-6900). With this variety of open spaces and crisp, clear waterways popular activities include...just about anything imaginable. From the traditional activities of hiking, fishing, golfing and horseback riding to the more “extreme” adventures of wakeboarding, hang gliding, off-road motorcycling and kayaking, Lake County is a one-stop vacation for outdoor enthusiasts.
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    Ocklawaha River 301 y 316 441 CoRd E 316 E Hw Reddick CoHwy 316 PUTNAM 1 NE Jacksonville Rd Graveyard Lake Lake Kerr 95 Grass Lake Oklawaha R 108th CongressLake Healy of theCowpond Lake United States Big Lake Louise StHwy 19 VOLUSIA Eaton Cr 5 1 3 y w FLAGLER H o Mud Lake C ) Indian Lake Prarie wy s H ing pr lt S Sa 4 ( 31 wy Salt Springs Hwy StH Lake Disston Eaton Cr N Hwy 314A 0 y 4 Ormond Beach Hw Lake St Eaton Wire Rd 0 Pierson StHwy 11 4 ) 75 N F 96 Rd y d StH w R Nfs 79 C rd e (Dan F o n t Lake e r Charles S t Lake George Lake Shaw Lake Pierson Lake Jumper St Hwy 40 ( F t Brooks Rd) Cain Lake NW 22nd St ) e NW 4th Ave v A NE 17th Rd h d 40) t R 27 S (St 8 t 40 NW 20th St NE 14th R 5 wy ( wy Redwater Lake d tH StH 4 S Daytona Beach 10th St 1 NE 14th St St 0 9 P NE 25th Ave ( Little Lake Jumper S i NE 11th St StHwy 40 (Silver n Springs Blvd) t DISTRICT e 4 H Payne Creek 1 A w StHwy 40 StHwy 40 (Silver StHwy 35 3 Ch Lake Prarie v y y e SE 25th SE Springs Blvd) w Rd Ter 196 NE tH 1 7 S 9 Mill Dam ) Ocala Ave Lake Lake Winona SE 14th St StHwy 40 (Ft Brooks Rd) SE 17th St StHwy 464 Caraway Lake 40 (17th St) StHwy SE 30th SE 17th St Bear Hole Ave Wildcat Lake Astor Lake Clifton Lake Dias StHwy St Johns River 40 Halfmoon Lake Schimmerhorne Lake Little Lake Bryant Lake Bryant North Grasshopper Lake VOLUSIA MARION NF Road 599-1 DISTRICT 24 StHwy 464 (Maricamp Rd) StHwy 35 Rd)(Baseline StHwy 200 South Grasshopper Lake Wells Pond 17 441 Halford Lake De Leon Springs Marshall Chain O Swamp Lake Lake Bessiola StHwy 35 (58th Ave) Silver Farles
    [Show full text]
  • St. Lucie River Is 35 Miles Long and Has Two Major Forks, the North Fork and the South Fork
    The St. Lucie River is 35 miles long and has two major forks, the North Fork and the South Fork. In the 1880s, the system was basically a freshwater stream flowing into the Indian River Lagoon. An inlet was dug in 1892 by local residents to provide direct access to the Atlantic Ocean, thus changing the St. Lucie from a river to an estuary. An estuary is found where a fresh water body (a river) meets a salt water body (the ocean) and forms brackish water. Estuaries have a high diver- sity of both plants and animals. Seagrasses, oysters, marine fish and invertebrates are all found in estuaries. FORT PIERCE C-25 U.S. 1 A1A Indian River Dr. C-24 PORT INDIAN RIVER LAGOON ST. LUCIE A1A HUTCHINSON C-24 d. ISLAND Blv ie uc t. L t S or P d Blv ach Be n se n Je C-23 JENSEN BEACH No rth Fo ST. LUCIE COUNTY rk ST. LUCIE C-23 RIVER MARTIN COUNTY Bessey S FLORIDA TURNPIKE Creek o A1A u STUART t h F o r PALM k CITY U.S. 1 ST. LUCIE INLET I-95 PORT SALERNO A1A S.R. 76 C-44 I-95 HOBE SOUND S.R. 710 HISTORY OF THE Creek in Palm City. The C-44 from Lake Okeechobee carries water east into the ST. LUCIE RIVER South Fork. When Lake Okeechobee The Ais Indians were first documented water levels get too high, water is in 1568 as occupying areas close to the released into the canal/river system.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Resources
    Application for Corridor Extension Historical Resources Historical Resources Although the Green Mountain Scenic Byway CME considers the proposed corridor eligible for designation on the strength of its recreational and natural resources, the corridor extension could be designated on the strength of its historical resources. The City of Mount Dora has created a Historic Preservation Review Area which is located within a larger National Register of Historic Places District. The entire Review Area is included within the proposed corridor extension. The extension connects the historic downtown of Winter Garden with the historic downtown of Mount Dora. Narrative The colonization of Florida by the Spanish proved disastrous to the Native Americans. Waves of epidemics of infectious diseases introduced from Europe crashed upon the Native Americans. Between 1565, the year that the Spanish founded St. Augustine, and 1595, when serious Catholic missionary attempts began, it is estimated that the Timucua speaking population had plummeted from about 150,000 to about 50,000. To add to the devastation of disease, savage raids by Creek and Yamasee Indians, often supported by Carolina colonists, further reduced the population. By 1700, the Timucua had been reduced to about 1,000 people. The remaining Timucua attempted to seek refuge from the raids at St. Augustine, but by 1753 only 136 Timucua remained. When the British took Florida from Spain in 1763, the few that were left were expelled from the St. Augustine area. A pitifully few Timucua moved south and tried to settle on the Tomoka River. It is possible that their descendants eventually joined the Seminoles. The Seminoles were originally part of the Creek Confederacy.
    [Show full text]