DOCSLIB.ORG

The Renaissance and the Birth of Printing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Renaissance and the Birth of Printing The Renaissance and the Birth of Printing THE CULTURAL IMPACT OF PRINTING SPREADS BEYOND GERMANY 1 Leaf from Decretum Gratian 1472 Mainz, Germany Peter Schoeffer (German, c.1425–1503), printer Peter Schoeffer was Johann Gutenberg’ apprentice, and is thought to have been the manager of his printshop in Mainz. Later, he entered into partnership with Johann Fust, Gutenberg’s original financial backer, to found the first successful printing business. This original leaf was printed on vellum by Schoeffer in 1472. It is notable that Schoeffer was the first to print a book in multiple colors (rather than rubricating the text by hand after printing.) The Printing Museum Collection 1995.012.01 2 Leaf from Scriptores astronomici veteres 1499 Venice, Italy Aldus Manutius (Italian, 1449–1515), printer Aldus Manutius established his famous Aldine Press in Venice in 1490. A great scholar as well as a great printer, Aldus published a large number of classical texts, including the first printed editions of works by Plato, Aristotle, Sophocles, and Euripides. One of his innovations was the printing of small books which could be carried in a pocket or saddlebag; another was the invention of Italic type. He is remembered as a master craftsman; one of his books, Colonna’s Hypnerotomachia Poliphili, has been called the most beautiful book ever printed. This leaf is from a collection of Greek and Roman astronomical texts. The Printing Museum Collection 1982.143.01 3 Leaf from De Praeparatione Evangelica of Eusebius Caesariensis 1470 Venice, Italy Nicolas Jenson, (French, 1420–1480), printer Nicolas Jenson, a Frenchman, is said to have learned printing at Mainz, where he was sent by his king, Charles VII. He did not, however, return to print in France, but moved to Venice, where he made a name as a brilliant printer and creator of typefaces. The modern type designer Bruce Rogers wrote that Jenson’s type “appears perhaps in its greatest perfection in his Eusebius of 1470.... I believe it to be at once the most beautiful and the most legible type in the world.” The Printing Museum Collection 1982.084.01 4 Leaf from Polychronicon 1482 Westminster, England William Caxton (English, 1422–1491), printer Printing was introduced to England by William Caxton in 1476. Not only was he the first printer in England, but he was the first to print a book in the English language, using type which he had designed. He is known for printing several great works of English literature, including Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. The text of this leaf is from a 14th century chronicle which traces world history from Adam and Eve to the threat of the Black Plague in 1348. On loan from Ann Rogers L1982.022.01 5 Vocabulario or Molina Dictionary 1555 Mexico Franciscan Fray Alonso de Molina (Spanish, c. 1511–1584), author Juan Pablo, printer Juan Pablos, the first printer in the Americas, was a Spanish court printer who accompanied Antonio de Mendoza, the first Viceroy of Mexico, to the New World in 1534. The first book to appear from his press was a Spanish translation of a Latin devotional text, though no copy currently exists; the earliest Mexican book known to have survived dates from 1544. This book is the first edition of the first dictionary to be published in the New World. The Franciscan Fray Alonso de Molina, a linguist as well as a priest, prepared this “vocabulary” of the Spanish and the Nahuatl (or Aztec) tongues. On loan from Marge Lamb L1984.001.01 6 Leaf from William Shakespeare’s Second Folio 1632 London, England Thomas Cotes, (British, died 1641), printer The first published collection of William Shakespeare’s works initially appeared in 1623, seven years after the playwright’s death. Though some of the plays had been published prior to this time, the First Folio is considered more reliable than most other publications, and contains the first appearance of eighteen of the plays. The Second Folio, which appeared nine years afterward, is largely unchanged from the first printing, containing the same thirty-six plays. The leaf on display was taken from a copy damaged in a fire; it contains a scene from King John. The Printing Museum Collection* 1992.112a.01 7 William Warter’s Proverbial Cards [facsimile] Date of original: November 23, 1698 Place of origin: London William Warter (British, 1680–1698; fl.), printer and bookseller Date of facsimile: 1995 Ink on paper Playing cards first appeared in Europe in the 14th century, likely by way of Egypt. By the mid-15th century, woodcuts of cards were printed in quantities comparable to devo- tional materials. This deck of playing cards was first printed by William Warter, a London bookseller, on November 23, 1698 in time for Christmas sales. It contains an assortment of proverbs with accompanying illustrations and would have appealed to customers in London where epigrams, adages, and proverbs were part of the popular culture of the time. It is part of a series of thematic decks with educational, political, or purely amusing content produced by Warter beginning in 1675. The sometimes irreverent ‘Proverbial Cards’ were produced originally by copperplate engraving with the suit marks stenciled at the corners. The expression—“Never look a gift horse in the mouth”— which suggests that when a gift is received, its value should not be scrutinized, remains in relatively common use to this day. Here, Warter’s illustration on the king of hearts depicts a comical, somewhat crude reversal of the old saying. The two of clubs presents the proverb, “All is fish that comes to the net,” which is traditionally taken to mean that one should take advantage of all opportunities that come one’s way. Warter puts Catholic and Protestant clergy in the fishermen’s net, poking a little fun at both Churches. Gift of Le Cygne Rose 1998.022.01.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shakespeare in Geneva
    Shakespeare in Geneva SHAKESPEARE IN GENEVA Early Modern English Books (1475-1700) at the Martin Bodmer Foundation Lukas Erne & Devani Singh isbn 978-2-916120-90-4 Dépôt légal, 1re édition : janvier 2018 Les Éditions d’Ithaque © 2018 the bodmer Lab/université de Genève Faculté des lettres - rue De-Candolle 5 - 1211 Genève 4 bodmerlab.unige.ch TABLE OF CONTENts Acknowledgements 7 List of Abbreviations 8 List of Illustrations 9 Preface 11 INTRODUctION 15 1. The Martin Bodmer Foundation: History and Scope of Its Collection 17 2. The Bodmer Collection of Early Modern English Books (1475-1700): A List 31 3. The History of Bodmer’s Shakespeare(s) 43 The Early Shakespeare Collection 43 The Acquisition of the Rosenbach Collection (1951-52) 46 Bodmer on Shakespeare 51 The Kraus Sales (1970-71) and Beyond 57 4. The Makeup of the Shakespeare Collection 61 The Folios 62 The First Folio (1623) 62 The Second Folio (1632) 68 The Third Folio (1663/4) 69 The Fourth Folio (1685) 71 The Quarto Playbooks 72 An Overview 72 Copies of Substantive and Partly Substantive Editions 76 Copies of Reprint Editions 95 Other Books: Shakespeare and His Contemporaries 102 The Poetry Books 102 Pseudo-Shakespeare 105 Restoration Quarto Editions of Shakespeare’s Plays 106 Restoration Adaptations of Plays by Shakespeare 110 Shakespeare’s Contemporaries 111 5. Other Early Modern English Books 117 NOTE ON THE CATALOGUE 129 THE CATALOGUE 135 APPENDIX BOOKS AND MANUscRIPts NOT INCLUDED IN THE CATALOGUE 275 Works Cited 283 Acknowledgements We have received precious help in the course of our labours, and it is a pleasure to acknowl- edge it.
    [Show full text]
  • WRAP Theses Crowther 2017.Pdf
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ 97559 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications James Shirley and the Restoration Stage By Stefania Crowther A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Renaissance Studies University of Warwick, Centre for Renaissance Studies June 2017 2 3 Acknowledgements This thesis was supported by the James Shirley Complete Works Project, and funded by the AHRC, and Centre for Renaissance Studies, University of Warwick. I would like to thank these organisations, and in particular Jayne Browne, Ingrid de Smett, David Lines, Jayne Brown, Heather Pilbin, Paul Botley, and especially Elizabeth Clarke and Paul Prescott for their very helpful guidance during the upgrade process. Special thanks are due to Hannah Davis, whose URSS project on Restoration Shirley, supervised by Teresa Grant, provided the starting point for this thesis. I am also enormously grateful to the colleagues, friends and tutors who have inspired and supported my work: Daniel Ashman, Thomasin Bailey, Stephen Clucas, Michael Dobson, Peter Foreshaw, Douglas Hawes, Simon Jackson, Victoria Jones, Griff Jameson, Peter Kirwan, Chris Main, Gerry McAlpine, Zois Pigadas, Catherine Smith, Lee White, Susan Wiseman.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of English Printing : 1476-1900
    J \ Books about Books Edited by A. W. Pollard A Short History of English Printing BOOKS ABOUT BOOKS Edited bv A. W. POLLARD POPULAR RE-ISSUE BOOKS IN MANUSCRIPT. By Falconer Madan, Bodley's Librarian, Oxford. THE BINDING OF BOOKS. By H. P. HORNE. A SHORT HISTORY OF ENGLISH PRINTING. By II. K. Plomer. EARLY ILLUSTRATED BOOKS. By A. W. POLI.ARD. Other volumes in pi-eparatioit. A Short History of English Printing 1476-1900 By Henry R. Plomer London Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibncr & Co., Ltd. Broadway House, 68-74 Carter Lane, E.C, MDCCCCXV I-'irst Edition, 1900 Second (Popular) Edition, 1915 The rights of translation and of reproduction are reserved Editor's Preface When Mr. Plomer consented at my request to write a short history of EngHsh printing which should stop neither at the end of the fifteenth century, nor at the end of the sixteenth century, nor at 1640, but should come down, as best it could, to our ovm day, we were not without appre- hensions that the task might prove one of some difficulty. How difficult it would be we had certainly no idea, or the book would never have been begun, and now that it is Imished I would bespeak the reader's sympathies, on Mr. Plomer 's behalf, that its inevitable shortcomings may be the more generously forgiven. If we look at what has already been written on the subject the diffi- culties will be more easily appreciated. In England, as in other countries, the period in the history of the press which is best known to us is, by the perversity of antiquaries, that which is furthest removed from our own time.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Shakespeare's Sonnets: John Benson and the 1640 Poems
    This is a repository copy of Reading Shakespeare's sonnets: John Benson and the 1640 poems. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/79005/ Article: Shrank, C. (2009) Reading Shakespeare's sonnets: John Benson and the 1640 poems. Shakespeare, 5 (3). 271 - 291 . ISSN 1745-0918 https://doi.org/10.1080/17450910903138054 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reading Shakespeare’s Sonnets: John Benson and the 1640 Poems Cathy Shrank (University of Sheffield) [Printed in Shakespeare, 5:3 (2009),271-291; URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17450910903138054] John Benson’s 1640 edition of Shakespeare’s Poems has found little critical favour in the centuries since its production.1 Benson reorders the sonnets (merging many into longer poems), adds descriptive titles, and publishes them alongside other poems – some of which are not by Shakespeare – from sources such as The Passionate Pilgrime and Englands Helicon.2 The work also includes an appendix of poems ‘By other Gentlemen’, such as Ben Jonson, John Milton, Francis Beaumont and Robert Herrick.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare Editions and Editors
    Shakespeare Editions and Editors The 16th and 17th Centuries The earliest texts of William Shakespeare’s works were published during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries in quarto or folio format. Folios are large, tall volumes; quartos are smaller, roughly half the size. Early Texts of Shakespeare’s Works: The Quartos and Bad Quartos (1594-1623) Of the thirty-six plays contained in the First Folio of 1623, eighteen have no other source. The eighteen other plays had been printed in separate and individual editions at least once between 1594 and 1623. Pericles (1609) and The Two Noble Kinsmen (1634) also appeared separately before their inclusions in folio collections. All of these were quarto editions, with one exception: the first edition of Henry VI, Part 3 was printed in octavo form in 1594. Popular plays like Henry IV, Part 1 and Pericles were reprinted in their quarto editions even after the First Folio appeared, sometimes more than once. But since the prefatory matter in the First Folio itself warns against the earlier texts, 18th and 19th century editors of Shakespeare tended to ignore the quarto texts in favor of the Folio. Gradually, however, it was recognized that the quarto texts varied widely among themselves; some much better than others. It was the bibliographer Alfred W. Pollard who originated the term “bad quarto” in 1909, to distinguish several texts that he judged significantly corrupt. He focused on four early quartos: Romeo and Juliet (1597), Henry V (1600), The Merry Wives of Windsor (1602), and Hamlet (1603). His reasons for citing these texts as “bad” were that they featured obvious errors, changes in word order, gaps in the sense of the text, jumbled printing of prose as verse and verse as prose, and similar problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Closure of the Theatres GABRIEL EGAN De Montfort University
    The Closure of the Theatres GABRIEL EGAN De Montfort University Like the Protestant Schism (or Reformation, depending upon which side you were on) around one hundred years earlier, the cataclysmic events of the English Civil War (1642–51) and the resulting Interregnum (1649–60) did not create an entirely unbridgeable rupture in the nation’s history, its collective consciousness, or even individuals’ personal experiences. Anthony Kitchin, the Bishop of Llandaff (1477–1563), for example, had the extraordinary experience of being a Roman Catholic bishop under Henry VIII, switching with him to the Protestant side in 1534, switching back when his daughter Mary I reinstated Roman doctrine in 1553, and switching to Protestantism again when Mary’s half-sister Elizabeth ascended her throne in 1558.1 Likewise, some people involved with theatre before the Civil War attempted to pick up where they left off when the eighteen-year closure ended in 1660. These included the state censor of plays Henry Herbert who held the role of Master of the Revels for half a century, from 1623 to 1673. This article will reconsider just what it meant for Caroline society to have its theatres abruptly closed (at least, officially) during the crisis of 1642, and what that meant in practice for particular members of the theatre industry. Until the 1980s, theatre historians usually told a quite straightforward and uncomplicated story about how the theatres came to be closed, and the story’s longevity is explained by its elegant simplicity and its ability to account for most of the known historical facts about theatre across the decades of English history from the Reformation to the Restoration and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • View Fast Facts
    FAST FACTS Author's Works and Themes: Hamlet “Author's Works and Themes: Hamlet.” Gale, 2019, www.gale.com. Writings by William Shakespeare Play Productions • Henry VI, part 1, London, unknown theater (perhaps by a branch of the Queen's Men), circa 1589-1592. • Henry VI, part 2, London, unknown theater (perhaps by a branch of the Queen's Men), circa 1590-1592. • Henry VI, part 3, London, unknown theater (perhaps by a branch of the Queen's Men), circa 1590-1592. • Richard III, London, unknown theater (perhaps by a branch of the Queen's Men), circa 1591-1592. • The Comedy of Errors, London, unknown theater (probably by Lord Strange's Men), circa 1592-1594; London, Gray's Inn, 28 December 1594. • Titus Andronicus, London, Rose or Newington Butts theater, 24 January 1594. • The Taming of the Shrew, London, Newington Butts theater, 11 June 1594. • The Two Gentlemen of Verona, London, Newington Butts theater or the Theatre, 1594. • Love's Labor's Lost, perhaps at the country house of a great lord, such as the Earl of Southampton, circa 1594-1595; London, at Court, Christmas 1597. • Sir Thomas More, probably by Anthony Munday, revised by Thomas Dekker, Henry Chettle, Shakespeare, and possibly Thomas Heywood, evidently never produced, circa 1594-1595. • King John, London, the Theatre, circa 1594-1596. • Richard II, London, the Theatre, circa 1595. • Romeo and Juliet, London, the Theatre, circa 1595-1596. • A Midsummer Night's Dream, London, the Theatre, circa 1595-1596. • The Merchant of Venice, London, the Theatre, circa 1596-1597. • Henry IV, part 1, London, the Theatre, circa 1596-1597.
    [Show full text]
  • Repertory by Genre at Lisle's Tennis Court
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX LANA MARIE HARPER PHD ENGLISH THE DEVELOPMENT OF EARLY ENGLISH PLAYHOUSES, 1560-1670 I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be submitted in whole or in part to another university for the award of any other degree Signature: Lana M Harper Abstract This thesis presents a study of playhouse spaces and the theatre industry in early modern England, and how they developed from 1560-1670. The period considered spans the English civil wars and Commonwealth to complicate the notion of a cessation of theatrical activity in 1642, and argues against the division of theatre history into distinct Renaissance and Restoration periods. The study builds on recent scholarly trends which have productively read early modern playing companies as consistent cultural entities with individual identities, by extending and applying this methodology to playhouse spaces. As such, this thesis proposes that all early modern playhouses had unique identities, and suggests that the frequent division into amphitheatre and indoor playhouses can produce an oversimplified binary with homogenising consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Editing' and Censorship in John Benson's Edition of Shakespeare's
    No cloudy stuff to puzzle the brain : Fair Editing’ and Censorship in John Benson’s Edition of Shakespeare’s Poems (1640) Line Cottegnies To cite this version: Line Cottegnies. No cloudy stuff to puzzle the brain : Fair Editing’ and Censorship in John Benson’s Edition of Shakespeare’s Poems (1640). Sophie Chiari. Freedom and Censorship in the Early Modern Literature, Routledge, pp.177-190, 2018, 9781138366534. hal-02006361 HAL Id: hal-02006361 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02006361 Submitted on 4 Feb 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. "’No cloudy stuff to puzzle the brain’: John Benson's edition of Shakespeare's Poems (1640) : between censorship and adaptation", in 'This is too insolent, and to be changed’: Freedom and Censorship in the Early Modern Literature, éd. Sophie Chiari, New York et Londres, Routledge, 2018, p. 177-190. Chapter 12 : ‘No cloudy stuff to puzzle the brain’: ‘Fair Editing’ and Censorship in John Benson’s Edition of Shakespeare’s Poems (1640) Line Cottegnies This chapter focuses on the long-maligned 1640 edition of Shakespeare’s sonnets by John Benson. The small octavo entitled Poems: written by Wil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Variant Issues of Shakespeare's Second Folio Milton's First Published English Poem a Bibliographical Problem
    THE VARIANT ISSUES OF SHAKESPEARE'S SECOND FOLIO AND MILTON'S FIRST PUBLISHED ENGLISH POEM A BIBLIOGRAPHICAL PROBLEM BY ROBERT METCALF SMITH, Ph.D. Professor of English TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword 5 I. The Bibliographical Status of the Second Folio 7 II. The Title Pages of the Second Folio 11 III. Milton's Epitaph on Shakespeare 32 IV. The Paper and Watermarks of the Title Pages and "Effigies" Leaves 45 V. A List of Second Folios 49 VI. The Value of Second Folios and Notable Copies 54 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. The Allot I Title Page 15 2. The Allot II Title Page 17 3. The Allot III Title Page . 19 4. The Allot IV Title Page 21 5. The Allot V Title Page 23 6. The Aspley Title Page 25 7. The Hawkins Title Page 27 8. The Meighen Title Page 29 9. The Smethwick Title Page 31 10. "Effigies" A 35 11. "Effigies" B 37 12. "Effigies" C 39 13. Milton's Epitaph 1640 and 1645 44 FOREWORD The present study describes and illustrates nine variant title pages and three variant "Effigies" leaves found in the Second Folio of Shakespeare, and dis­ cusses the bearing of these variants upon the bibli­ ography of Shakespeare and Milton. The study is based upon data from 124 extant copies. A differen­ tiated list of Second Folios and their present loca­ tion, and an account of Second Folio values have also been included. It has been thought best, since some private owners dislike publicity, and since the list is not a Census, to substitute for the names the general location of private copies.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine & Rare Books
    Sale 457 Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:00 PM Fine & Rare Books from Two Private Collections (with additions) Auction Preview Tuesday, June 28, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm Wednesday, June 29, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm Thursday, June 30, 9:00 am to 1:00 pm Other showings by appointment 133 Kearny Street 4th Floor:San Francisco, CA 94108 phone: 415.989.2665 toll free: 1.866.999.7224 fax: 415.989.1664 [email protected]:www.pbagalleries.com REAL-TIME BIDDING AVAILABLE PBA Galleries features Real-Time Bidding for its live auctions. This feature allows Internet Users to bid on items instantaneously, as though they were in the room with the auctioneer. If it is an auction day, you may view the Real-Time Bidder at http://www.pbagalleries.com/realtimebidder/ . Instructions for its use can be found by following the link at the top of the Real-Time Bidder page. Please note: you will need to be logged in and have a credit card registered with PBA Galleries to access the Real-Time Bidder area. In addition, we continue to provide provisions for Absentee Bidding by email, fax, regular mail, and telephone prior to the auction, as well as live phone bidding during the auction. Please contact PBA Galleries for more information. IMAGES AT WWW.PBAGALLERIES.COM All the items in this catalogue are pictured in the online version of the catalogue at www.pbagalleries. com. Go to Live Auctions, click Browse Catalogues, then click on the link to the Sale. CONSIGN TO PBA GALLERIES PBA is always happy to discuss consignments of books, maps, photographs, graphics, autographs and related material.
    [Show full text]
  • Proem Shakespeare's “Plaies and Poems”
    Cambridge University Press 0521839238 - Shakespeare, National Poet-Playwright Patrick Cheney Excerpt More information Proem Shakespeare’s “Plaies and Poems” In 1640, the publisher John Benson presents to his English reading public a Shakespeare who is now largely lost to us: the national author of poems and plays. By printing his modest octavo edition of the Poems: Written By Wil. Shake-speare. Gent., Benson curiously aims to complement the 1623 printing venture of Shakespeare’s theatre colleagues, John Heminge and Henry Condell, who had presented Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies in their monumental First Folio. Thus, in his own Dedicatory Epistle “To the Reader,” Benson remarks that he presents “some excellent and sweetly composed Poems,” which “had not the fortune by reason of their Infancie in his death, to have the due accommodation of proportionable glory, with the rest of his everliving Workes” (∗2r). Indeed, as recent scholarship demonstrates, Benson boldly prints his octavo Poems on the model of Heminge and Condell’s Folio Plays.1 Not simply does Benson’s volume share its printer, Thomas Cotes, with the 1632 Folio, but both editions begin with an identical format: an engraved portrait of the author; a dedicatory epistle “To the Reader”; and a set of commendatory verses, with Leonard Digges contributing an impor- tant celebratory poem to both volumes. Benson’s engraving by William Marshall even derives from the famous Martin Droeshout engraving in the First Folio, and six of the eight lines beneath Benson’s engraving are borrowed from Ben Jonson’s famed memorial poem to Shakespeare in that volume.
    [Show full text]