DOCSLIB.ORG

Ilford to Barking Riverside Consultation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ilford to Barking Riverside Consultation Report Proposed improvements between Ilford and Barking Riverside Consultation Report November 2019 Contents Table of figures ........................................................................................................... 3 Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 5 2. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 6 2.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Who we consulted .......................................................................................... 6 2.3 Dates and duration ......................................................................................... 6 2.4 What we asked ............................................................................................... 6 2.5 Methods of responding ................................................................................... 7 2.6 Consultation materials and publicity ............................................................... 7 2.7 How we considered equalities in the consultation .......................................... 8 2.8 Analysis of consultation responses ................................................................ 9 3. About the respondents ...................................................................................... 10 3.1 Respondent type .......................................................................................... 10 3.2 List of responding stakeholders.................................................................... 10 3.3 How respondents heard about the consultation ........................................... 11 3.4 Distribution of respondents .......................................................................... 11 3.5 Demographics .............................................................................................. 13 4. Summary of all consultation responses ............................................................ 17 4.1 Question 1: Effect of proposals as a whole on the way people choose to travel 17 4.2 Question 1 (open question) & Question 3 (open question): Effect and impact of proposals as a whole ......................................................................................... 19 4.3 Question 2: Neighbourhoods of interest selected by respondents ............... 20 4.4 Question 4: Frequency of travel ................................................................... 21 4.5 Quality of Consultation ................................................................................. 22 5. Responses to issues raised .............................................................................. 24 6. Next steps ......................................................................................................... 36 2 Table of figures Figure 1 Public drop-in events: dates, times and venues ........................................... 8 Figure 2 Public and stakeholder respondents to the consultation ............................ 10 Figure 3 Respondent types ...................................................................................... 10 Figure 4 How respondents heard about the consultation ......................................... 11 Figure 5 Map to show the location of respondents to the consultation within proximity to the proposed Cycleway route ............................................................................... 12 Figure 6 Table to show the number of responses received from residents of each represented borough ................................................................................................ 13 Figure 7 The gender of respondents to the consultation .......................................... 13 Figure 8 The age of respondents to the consultation ............................................... 14 Figure 9 The ethnicity of respondents to the consultation ........................................ 15 Figure 10 The sexual orientation of respondents to the consultation ....................... 15 Figure 11 Faith of the respondents to the consultation............................................. 16 Figure 12 Respondents who considered that their day-to-day activities were limited ................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 13 Effect of proposals on the way people choose to travel (walking, cycling and public transport)................................................................................................. 17 Figure 14 Effect of proposals on the way people choose to travel (motor vehicles) . 18 Figure 15 Top 10 most frequently raised issues ....................................................... 20 Figure 16 Respondents selection of the neighbourhoods their comments related to 21 Figure 17 Frequency of travel by walking, cycling, public transport and private transport ................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 18 Assessment of the quality of the consultation .......................................... 23 3 Executive summary We worked with the London Borough of Barking & Dagenham to develop proposals to help people walk and cycle more often in neighbourhoods including Ilford, Barking and Barking Riverside. Our proposals are an important part of the Mayor's Transport Strategy and were guided by the Mayor's Healthy Streets Approach, which aims to encourage more sustainable travel and to make London greener, healthier and more pleasant. We held a consultation on our proposals from 24 June – 5 August 2019 and invited a wide range of people and other stakeholders to give us their views. Summary of results There were 160 responses to the consultation, including from 7 organisations or individuals we would consider to be stakeholders. We asked respondents to judge what effect our proposals might have on walking, cycling, using public transport, using private transport for personal journeys or using private transport for business journeys. We provided a range of effects for respondents to choose between, ranging from ‘Many more people would choose to travel in this way’, to ‘Fewer people would choose to travel in this way’. We also provided the option ‘I am unsure what effect the proposals might have’. We found that: 78 per cent of respondents felt that our proposals would mean that more people would cycle 73 per cent of respondents felt that our proposals would mean that more people would walk 41 per cent of respondents felt that our proposals would mean that more people would use public transport 41 per cent of respondents felt that our proposals would mean that fewer people would use private transport for personal journeys 24 per cent of respondents felt that our proposals would mean that fewer people would use private transport for business journeys We also received a range of written comments about our proposals. We have analysed these to identify the issues raised and have described them later in this report. Next steps The feedback we received was invaluable in helping us to further improve the scheme. We will continue to work with the London Borough of Barking & Dagenham to developed detailed designs, incorporating changes highlighted in the Responses to issues raised section of the report. Subject to final approval we currently intend to commence construction on the route in early 2020. 4 1. About the proposals 1.1 Introduction Our proposals were designed to make it easier for people to cross busy roads, improve walking and cycling access to the new Barking Riverside development as well as Barking and Ilford town centres; and offer a safe and comfortable space for people to cycle. Our consultation was focussed on a section of new Cycleway (and associated other improvements, including for pedestrians) between Barking and Barking Riverside. The section of the route between Barking and Ilford will be consulted on at a later date, following further feasibility work. The proposals included: A new high-quality cycle route that people can use to get around A new pedestrian and cycle footbridge over Mayes Brook, with additional lighting and green space improvements Upgraded walking and cycling crossing on Bastable Avenue to provide easier and safer access to Thames View Junior and Infant School New ‘continuous’ pedestrian crossings at the junctions of St Awdry's Road and Eldred Road Links to both existing and proposed cycling routes including Cycle Superhighway 3 (Barking to Tower Gateway) and the Ripple Greenway Improved access into Barking Riverside development for people walking and cycling 1.2 Purpose The proposed improvements were designed to help us meet the target set out in the Mayor's Transport Strategy that 80 per cent of all London trips be made on foot, by bicycle or on public transport by 2041. Changing how space is allocated to different road users throughout London is an important way of helping more people travel sustainably. The areas between Ilford and Barking Riverside
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Barking Town Centre the Surprising Choice
    Secret Garden Copyright Doug Atfield Creative Industries Quarter Oishi Sushi restaurant Barking Town Centre The Surprising Choice Barking Learning Centre Copyright Oishi Sushi Barking Town Centre is changing fast. Its Elevate will transform and deliver services to reputation for high quality design and public Barking and Dagenham and other public realm is growing with numerous awards sector bodies, enable broader council including Best European Public Square. transformation, and contribute to regeneration and economic development across the There are a broad range of places to eat borough. As such the Joint Venture is keen to ranging from a Sushi restaurant to traditional discuss both civil service relocations and east end cafés as well as numerous chain scope for new contract opportunities with and independent retailers. A popular street keenly priced shared services. market runs four times a week and the nearby Barking Park and Abbey green We are offering to work together to deliver a provide attractive space to relax. A theatre, cost effective relocation solution. We meet leisure centre and creative industries quarter your needs to save money quickly through add to the offer. And there are hotels and lower rents and reduced cost of staff APPENDIX conference faciltities when you need them. relocation, while providing quality Accessibility is superb. accommodation with good accessibility and good facilities. You meet our needs by Elevate East London LLP is a joint venture continuing the regeneration of the Town company between the London Borough of Centre. Barking and Dagenham and Agilisys. Arboretum, Town Square 3 Accessibility Barking's public transport accessibility is superb as the table below shows.
    [Show full text]
  • 114 Final Report
    The Barking Code Final report July 2004 Prepared by B U R N S + N I C E 70 Cowcross Street London EC1M 6EJ t. 020 7253 0808 f. 020 7253 0909 Barking Town Centre Contents Background & rationale 5 Introduction 7 Barking’s evolution 8 Barking today 10 Sense of place 12 Public realm hieracrchy 16 Town code rationale 17 Town code principles Design guidelines 18 Design guidelines Implementation 26 Town code implementation 28 High street network 30 Abbey Green 31 Riverside 32 19th century housing 33 Late 20th century housing 34 Materials matrix Typical details 37 Paving details 42 Service and drainage covers 43 Kerbs and edges 44 Tree surrounds in paving 45 Street furniture set in paving Appendix A - Directory of manufacturers 47 Directory of manufacturers Appendix B - Pilot projects 49 ELT route / Ripple Road / London Road / East Street 50 London Road 52 Ripple Road 54 Broadway 55 St Ann’s Road 59 Abbey Road Barking Town Centre B U R N S + N I C E 3 Background & rationale 1. Introduction Barking is the subject of a comprehensive regeneration initiative through a The Council’s commitment to a better quality public environment is a confi dence partnership between local government, regional bodies and national agents. building measure which is an essential precursor to increased investment by Funding is now available for some of the environmental improvements needed the private sector and a benefi t to the multi-ethnic and multi-cultural community. st to position the Town Centre fi rmly into the 21 century. The vision for this initiative Different interpretations of street-life and public spaces can co-exist in harmony, it is is contained in the Council’s Regeneration Strategy (‘An urban renaissance for however important to create feasible schemes imbedded in reality and practicality.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Food Cities Regional Food Partnership Award
    Sustainable Food Cities Regional Food Partnership Award The Sustainable Food Cities Regional Partnership Award is designed to recognise and celebrate the work of cross-sector food partnerships that are facilitating progress on healthy and sustainable food over an extensive geographic area (greater city, county, region etc.) and that are actively pursuing and implementing policies that support the emergence and success of local Sustainable Food Cities partnerships and programmes at a town, city, borough and/or district level within that geographic area. Regional Food Partnership Award applicants must be: registered as members of the Sustainable Food Cities Network; cross-sector partnerships involving key public sector, NGO and other bodies that are working together over the same extended geographic area; and working within the framework of a healthy and sustainable food strategy/plan that covers all six Sustainable Food Cities key issues: Promoting healthy and sustainable food to the public Tackling food poverty, diet-related ill-health and access to affordable healthy food Building community food knowledge, skills, resources and projects Promoting a vibrant and diverse sustainable food economy Transforming catering and food procurement Reducing waste and the ecological footprint of the food system There are three tiers to the award: bronze, silver and gold. For each level of the award, applicants will have to provide evidence of driving and supporting: significant action on the ground across each of the six SFC key food issues across their geographic area; policy changes that directly or indirectly promote healthy, fair and sustainable food across that area; and the emergence of successful local SFC partnerships and programmes across that same area.
    [Show full text]
  • Barking and Dagenham Waste Management Strategy
    BARKING AND DAGENHAM WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2005-2020 “Together we will build communities and transform lives” 28 March 2006 1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND NATIONAL CONTEXT 2. HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO BARKING AND DAGENHAM? 3. ACHIEVING EXCELLENCE 4. DELIVERY – OPTIONS TO ACHIEVE OUR AIMS 5. IMPLEMENTATION AND CONSULTATION 6. REVIEW ANNEXES ANNEX A Strategic Corporate Priorities for Action 2005- 2010 ANNEX B Action Plan ANNEX C Legal Obligations and Policy Requirements ANNEX D Implications of LATS and Waste Growth Projections ANNEX E Options for Waste Prevention ANNEX F Glossary of Terms ANNEX G IWMS Information ANNEX H Draft Headline Strategy for ELWA’s Joint MWMS 2 Abbreviations ABRP Animal By-Products Regulations Bio-MRF Biological Materials Recycling Facilities — a Bio-MRF extracts recyclables from the refuse stream, biologically treats waste through composting and drying and creates a fuel for combustion. BMW Biodegradable municipal waste BVPI Best Value Performance Indicators CA Civic Amenity Site (site for householders to deposit waste) CELO Community and Education Liaison Officers C&I Commercial and Industrial CVS Council for Voluntary Service Defra Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DCF Designated Collection Facility for WEEE (see below) DPD Development Plan Document ELCRP East London Community Recycling Partnership ELV End of Life Vehicles (EU Directive) ELWA East London Waste Authority EPA Act Environmental Protection Act ERM Environmental Resources Management EWC European Waste Catalogue GLA
    [Show full text]
  • (By Email) Our Ref: MGLA200420
    (By email) Our Ref: MGLA200420-9439 19 May 2020 Dear Thank you for your request for information which the Greater London Authority (GLA) received on 16 March 2020. Your request has been dealt with under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) 2000. You asked for: Could I have a copy of the initial report "understanding London market" which was commissioned to the ROI team Please note that I am not seeking the final published version which was written by Sarah Jarvis of Placeworks, and GLA Regeneration But the original version as submitted by the ROI team before it was reviewed for publication and which the ROI team refused to amend and to change the content of the document as requested by the GLA. Our response to your request is as follows: Please find attached the information the GLA holds within scope of your request. The draft report was produced for client group to review. The client group was comprised of the GLA, London Councils, reps from x2 local authorities, NMTF and NABMA who steered the project form inception to completion. The draft was subject to discussion and extensive comments from the client group and as a result was revised following these comments. If you have any further questions relating to this matter, please contact , Senior Project Officer ( @london.gov.uk), quoting the reference at the top of this letter. Yours sincerely Information Governance Officer If you are unhappy with the way the GLA has handled your request, you may complain using the GLA’s FOI complaints and internal review procedure, available at: https://www.london.gov.uk/about-us/governance-and-spending/sharing-our- information/freedom-information Understanding London’s Markets Draft text for review by Client Group Section 0- Preview Material 0.2 Introduction A consortium of three London based SME’s, we have worked together to research, produce, write and design this report with the associated Toolkit and maps under a commission from the GLA.
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Barking &Dagenham
    CREATIVE BARKING & DAGENHAM THE ARTS, BUT NOT AS YOU KNOW IT, IN BARKING & DAGENHAM Art and active citizenship, confidence and civic pride - as an Arts Advisor to the Cultural Connectors and Creative Barking and Dagenham team since 2013, it’s been rewarding to see how successfully the project’s vision to engage local people in commissioning and programming has been realised. The team’s imaginative, consistent and persistent approach to building successful collaborations with individuals and communities has resulted in an ambitious range of artistic projects, festivals and creative partnerships. These have delighted and surprised audiences and participants, generated new partnerships and shifted perceptions of the borough, both regionally and nationally. To effect this change in perception CBD sought to ensure that the policy and strategy was rooted in local people’s interests and aspirations, so that it would be owned and championed by them. Placing consultation and collaboration at the heart of the process of change, right from the outset, has given value and status to the work of this Creative People and Places initiative. In Barking and Dagenham, the CBD staff team, the advisors and the local authority have foregrounded working with situated knowledge and insights of people who live and work in the borough. Over 100 voluntary ‘Cultural Connectors’ have been recruited, local residents who are the project’s advocates and decision makers. The arts commissioning is decided by panels where at least 60% of the voting power is held by these residents. This is meaningful participation and engagement with real roles, risks and responsibilities. The Cultural Connectors have built a strong critical frame of reference over the years, visiting theatre, festivals and galleries to see work across London and the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Text for Group Seminar: Gest, Chapter 3 Arquivo
    The New Minority The New Minority White Working Class Politics in an Age of Immigration and Inequality JUSTIN GEST 1 1 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. © Oxford University Press 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Gest, Justin, author. Title: The new minority : white working class politics in an age of immigration and inequality / Justin Gest. Description: New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2016. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016010130 (print) | LCCN 2016022736 (ebook) | ISBN 9780190632540 (hardcover : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780190632557 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780190632564 (Updf) | ISBN 9780190632571 (Epub) Subjects: LCSH: Working class—Political activity—Great Britain. | Working class—Political activity— United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Make the Space Work My Home Redesign: Page 18 2  WEDNESDAY 6 JUNE 2018 EVENING STANDARD Homes Property | News
    Wednesday 6 June 2018 THE CUTTING EDGE Designer glass: Page 14 15,000 NEW HOMES BARKING COOL RENTING SPOTLIGHT ON BERMONDSEY London transformed by 2021 London’s answer to New York Piccadilly line with hi-tech trains A tasty place to be Page 4 Page 6 Page 10 Page 28 Make the space work My home redesign: Page 18 2 WEDNESDAY 6 JUNE 2018 EVENING STANDARD Homes Property | News THIS WEEK IN... Property search ‘Rapid change like this at all levels is crucial to our city’ Life changer of the week Just Janice the venue for your Morley arty new venture EDITOR £1.5 million: this fine Regency affair is minutes away from A bus trip this week was the start of a Cheltenham’s Michelin-star journey that will change many lives. restaurants, concert halls and art Trophy home of the week Perch by a Wren church gallery and would lend itself to a Transport giants Network Rail and TfL variety of uses: an exhibition £1,995,000: you might find your calling at a divine penthouse within St Olave’s Court, set between took investors on a tour of the land they space, a concert venue or a Ironmonger Lane and Old Jewry in the City and forming part of an historic conversion of a former plan to unlock for 15,000 rental, private boutique B&B perhaps. church built by Sir Christopher Wren. The penthouse spans two floors covering 2,088sq ft, with It has five floors with potential three bedrooms, three bathrooms and an upper floor transformed into an ultra-modern, open-plan sale and affordable homes by 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Barking Town Centre Strategy Realising Barking’S Full Potential Foreword
    2015/18 Barking Town Centre Strategy Realising Barking’s full potential Foreword Town centres everywhere continue to play a key role in people’s quality of life, providing economic opportunities, employment and places to meet, relax and enjoy. Barking will become East London’s new cultural hub, provide a wide choice of good value homes, great places to meet and relax with significant new opportunities for work. With superb accessibility, a growing diverse population and development potential Barking is extremely well placed to continue its transformation over the coming years. We will work with partners to co-ordinate and drive the changes required to ensuring Barking becomes a town centre more people actively choose to live, work, learn and spend time in. High streets and town centres across the country are facing new challenges and there is a strong recognition that Barking will have to carve its own identity with a broader mix of functions based on retail and culture, but offering so much more. Barking Riverside, a new 11,000 home community will be served by a direct rail link to Barking - this is a superb opportunity for Barking but only if it offers the facilities and quality of Councillor Cameron Geddes environment which will attract and retain people. This Strategy aims to ensure the Portfolio Holder for Regeneration quality of development achieved over recent years continues and that the town centre’s offer is broadened to meet the needs of existing and new residents. I will work tirelessly with the Barking Town Team and others to deliver the vision set out in this strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly Planning and Housing Committee
    London Assembly Planning Committee Combined Evidence Received Investigation: The Future of London's Town Centres Contents Evidence Reference Number Evidence Contributor Page Number TC001 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames 2 TC002 Royal Town Planning Institute 5 TC003 Planning Aid for London 9 TC004 Renaisi 12 TC005 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea 15 TC006 Peter Brett Associates 17 TC007 London Borough of Hillingdon 21 TC008 London Borough of Waltham Forest 28 TC009 London Borough of Croydon 34 TC010 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham 38 TC011 Living Streets 53 TC012 British BIDs 65 TC013 London Borough of Wandsworth 73 TC014 London Borough of Enfield 77 TC015 Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames 83 TC016 LSE Cities 87 TC017 Association of Town & City Management 94 TC018 London Borough of Brent 103 TC019 City of London 108 TC020 London Councils 110 TC021 Ben Kochan, Journalist and Researcher 117 TC022 London Borough of Southwark 122 TC023 Peter Wood – Postgraduate Researcher, the 135 Open University 1 TC001_LBRuT Officers London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Officer Response from London Borough of Richmond upon Thames to the London Assembly Planning Committee’s consultation on the ‘Proposed Review of the Future of London’s Town Centres’. 1. What new ideas and existing best practise could help re-imagine and develop London’s high streets and town centres of the future? The majority of centres in Richmond upon Thames are relatively buoyant compared to the national and regional average. There are also limited opportunities to provide additional retail floorspace in town centres. Although national trends might suggest an approach of greater diversification of use in town centres, it should be recognised in the forthcoming SPG that different approaches will be necessary reflecting the characteristics of individual town centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable’ Homes It’S Time to Rewrite the Rules Page 6 4 WEDNESDAY 5 JULY 2017 EVENING STANDARD Homes & Property | News the Outer Suburbs Give Young Buyers a Chance
    Wednesday 5 July 2017 Cushions get Homes& puffed up Design trends Property Page 14 MAD ABOUT BARKING P8 COMMUTING: HOT HAMPSHIRE P10 NEW DESIGNERS P16 SPOTLIGHT ON CATFORD P28 ‘Affordable’ homes It’s time to rewrite the rules Page 6 4 WEDNESDAY 5 JULY 2017 EVENING STANDARD Homes & Property | News The outer suburbs give young buyers a chance HE answer to finding an Trophy affordable London home lies in outlying suburbs, home of from Barking in the far east the week to Colindale way up north. TBoth emerge among the capital’s lead- your kingdom ing future affordable housing hotspots in a new study. and a horse in At Barking Riverside — the huge regen- eration of 443 Thames-front acres four Shakespeare miles east of London City airport — 1,100 new homes are under construction to country be sold on a shared-ownership basis. The latest review from Halifax, Brit- ain’s biggest mortgage lender, reveals £4.95 million: everything equestrian facilities include orangery. Six bedrooms span the average deposit for a first-time buyer you could wish for in a bolt 15 stable boxes, a tack room, the upper floors overlooking in the capital has breached the £100,000 hole can be found at this exercise track, paddocks and landscaped gardens, a tennis mark, at just over £106,000, while the compact country estate in the living space for staff in a two- court and a lake, while the cost of a starter home has increased to idyllic village of Kineton, in bedroom coach house. indoor pool and gym provide almost £410,000 — pushing a growing rolling Warwickshire The substantial Cotswold a further retreat.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Committee of Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Redbridge Clinical Commissioning Groups
    Joint Committee of Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Redbridge Clinical Commissioning Groups 8 November 2018 11.30am – 12.30pm Boardrooms, Becketts House, Ilford, IG1 2QX Item Time Lead Attached, Director verbal or to follow 1.0 Welcome, introductions and apologies 11.30 Chair 1.1 Declaration of conflicts of interest Attached Types of interest - financial, non-financial professional, non-financial personal, indirect 2.0 Questions from the public 11.35 3.0 Community Urgent Care review 11.45 SM Attached 4.0 Date of next meeting – 29 November 2018 12.30 1 Joint Committee of Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Redbridge (BHR) CCGs Conflicts of Interest Register, which includes BHR CCGs Governing Body members and other decision makers Date - 9 October 2018 Conflics of interest will remain on the register for a minimum of 6 months following expiry Date of Interest Type of Interest Current position Declared Interest- Is the (s) held- i.e. (Name of the interest First Name Surname Governing Body, Nature of Interest Action taken to mitigate risk organisation and direct or From To Member practice, nature of business) Non- Non- indirect? Employee or other Interests Interests Interests Personal Personal Financial Financial Financial Professional Professional Barking & Dagenham CCG Jagan John Governing Body King Edwards Medical X Direct GP partner and other GPs are Jun-10 current No immediate action required. Member - CCG Group family members Declarations made at the Chair beginning of meetings. Will not be involved in any decision making regarding the conflict. King Edwards Medical X Indirect Other GPs are family members Jun-10 current No immediate action required.
    [Show full text]