DOCSLIB.ORG

CD22 and Siglec-G Regulate Inhibition of B-Cell Signaling by Sialic Acid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CD22 and Siglec-G Regulate Inhibition of B-Cell Signaling by Sialic Acid Glycobiology vol. 24 no. 9 pp. 807–817, 2014 doi:10.1093/glycob/cwu066 Advance Access publication on July 6, 2014 REVIEW CD22 and Siglec-G regulate inhibition of B-cell signaling by sialic acid ligand binding and control B-cell tolerance Downloaded from http://glycob.oxfordjournals.org/ Lars Nitschke1 co-receptors is regulated by extracellular-bound ligands, which Division of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Erlangen, determine the association of the co-receptors to the BCR. B-cell Erlangen, Germany immunity depends on recognition of foreign antigens and a lack of responsiveness to self-antigens. Although central B-cell toler- Received on April 29, 2014; revised on June 26, 2014; accepted on June 27, 2014 ance is induced in the bone marrow by several mechanisms, many peripheral B cells in the periphery escape these tolerance CD22 and Siglec-G are two B-cell expressed members of the mechanisms, produce self-reactive antibodies and need to be con- Siglec (sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin (Ig)-like lectin) trolled by peripheral tolerance mechanisms in order to prevent family and are potent inhibitors of B-cell signaling. Genetic autoimmunity (Wardemann et al. 2003). Inhibitory co-receptors approaches have provided evidence that this inhibition of on B cells contribute to this control of B-cell tolerance. at Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Z on August 3, 2016 B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) signaling by Siglecs is depend- CD22 (Siglec-2) and Siglec-G (or its human ortholog ent on ligand binding to sialic acids in specific linkages. The Siglec-10) are two B-cell expressed members of the Siglec (sialic cis-ligand-binding activity of CD22 leads to homo-oligomer acid-binding immunoglobulin (Ig)-like lectin) family and have formation, which are to a large extent found in membrane been shown to negatively regulate BCR signaling (Jellusova and domains that are distinct from those containing the BCR. In Nitschke 2012). Both are associated to some extent with the BCR contrast, Siglec-G is recruited via sialic acid binding to the (Peaker and Neuberger 1993; Zhang and Varki 2004; Müller et al. BCR. This interaction of Siglec-G with mIgM leads to an in- 2013) and are inhibitory co-receptors. Both Siglecs carry intracel- hibitory function that seems to be specific for B-1 cells. Both lular inhibitory ITIMs (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition CD22 and Siglec-G control B-cell tolerance and loss of these motifs) and recruit the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 that inhibits proteins, its ligands or its inhibitory pathways can increase signaling (Doody et al. 1995; Pfrengle et al. 2013). The inhibitory the susceptibility for autoimmune diseases. CD22 is a target functions of both Siglecs are regulated by ligand binding (Hutzler protein both in B-cell leukemias and lymphomas, as well as et al. 2014). Both Siglecs bind to sialic acids in specific linkages, in B-cell mediated autoimmune diseases. Both antibodies which are attached to glycoproteins and which are present on and synthetic chemically modified sialic acids are currently cellular surfaces, including the B-cell surface. The presence or tested to target Siglecs on B cells. absence of these ligands regulates the association of these two Siglecs to the BCR and thus influences the strength of inhibition. Keywords: autoimmunity / B lymphocytes / inhibitory Since sialic acids are abundantly expressed in vertebrates, but signaling / Siglecs often not found on microorganisms they are a part of “self- structures” and there is evidence that the sialic acid binding by B-cell Siglecs regulates B-cell tolerance and prevents autoimmun- Introduction to B-cell Siglecs ity (Crocker et al. 2007). B cells are an important part of the adaptive immune system and generate the humoral immune response by secretion of antigen- Regulation of B-cell signaling specific antibodies. The signaling by the B-cell antigen receptor (BCR), induced by antigen binding is crucial for triggering B-cell CD22 and Siglec-G are the only two Siglecs which are development, B-cell activation, as well as differentiation to expressed on murine B cells. Human B cells express CD22, antibody-secreting plasma cells. Accessory transmembrane mole- Siglec-10, as well as Siglec-6 (Crocker et al. 2007). CD22 has a cules or co-receptors on the B-cell surface modulate BCR signal- very B-cell restricted expression pattern (Torres et al. 1992). An ing. These B-cell co-receptors can be activatory or inhibitory and expression and function outside of the B-cell lineage has only fulfil these functions by binding additional signaling proteins been shown on intestinal eosinophils and on a DC subpopula- with their intracellular tails and thereby recruiting these effectors tion (Wen et al. 2012; Ma et al. 2013). Also Siglec-G shows the into the vicinity of the BCR. Very often the activity of highest expression pattern on B cells; however, it is also expressed on dendritic cells (DCs) and eosinophils as shown by use of newly generated monoclonal anti-Siglec-G antibodies 1To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel: +49-9131-85-28453; (Pfrengle et al. 2013; Hutzler et al. 2014). Both Siglecs are able Fax: +49-9131-85-28526; e-mail: [email protected] to associate to the BCR on B cells and inhibit BCR-mediated © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected] 807 L Nitschke signaling. While both Siglecs can inhibit BCR signaling on B 1996; Otipoby et al. 1996; Sato et al. 1996; Nitschke et al. cells, Siglec-G deficient mice show that Siglec-G is mainly a 1997). A second phosphatase, the inositol phosphatase SHIP, non-redundant inhibitory receptor on B-1 cells, a B-cell subpo- can also be bound to the tyrosine phosphorylated CD22 tail in a pulation with special functions (Ding et al. 2007; Hoffmann complex with the adaptor proteins Grb2 and Shc, but has a so et al. 2007). In contrast, CD22 seems to be the dominant inhibi- far unknown function (Poe et al. 2000). The CD22 ITIM motifs tory Siglec for conventional B cells (also called B-2 cells). are critical for the inhibitory function of CD22, as has been However, when transfected into a chicken B-cell line, which shown in B-cell lines, but also recently in mice in which the resembles immature conventional B cells, Siglec-G can also three ITIM tyrosines were mutated (Müller et al. 2013). These Downloaded from inhibit surface (s)IgM-triggered signaling there (Hoffmann CD22 ITIM-mutated knockin mice (called CD22-Y2,5,6F et al. 2007). Also when mouse B cells are treated with high- mice, for mutations in the 2nd, 5th and 6th tyrosine of the three affinity Siglec-G ligands, BCR signaling can be suppressed in ITIMs) had a similar phenotype as CD22-deficient mice. conventional B cells (Pfrengle et al. 2013). The inhibitory sig- Siglec-G is a negative regulator of Ca2+ signaling specifically naling by CD22 and Siglec-G has been the subject of several in B-1 cells, as Siglecg−/− mice have a B-1-cell restricted pheno- recent reviews and will therefore be covered here only briefly type and Siglecg−/− B-1 cells show increased anti-IgM-induced http://glycob.oxfordjournals.org/ (Nitschke 2009; Jellusova and Nitschke 2012). Ca2+ signaling, in contrast to B-2 cells of these mice (Hoffmann The signaling function of CD22 has been dissected in detail et al. 2007). Siglec-G and the human ortholog Siglec-10 both by several groups. The intracellular tail of CD22 carries six tyr- have one ITIM and one ITIM-like sequence and can bind SHP-1 osines, which are the only known signaling modules of CD22. (as shown for Siglec-G) (Pfrengle et al. 2013)orSHP-1andthe Three tyrosines are found within conventional ITIMs (Y783, related phosphatase SHP-2 (as shown for Siglec-10) (Whitney Y843 and Y863), one is part of an ITIM-like motif (Y817) and et al. 2001). How these SHP phosphatases regulate downstream one is a Grb-2 binding motif (Y828) (Doody et al. 1995; signaling in B-1 cells is not known in detail as crucial signaling Otipoby et al. 2001) (Figure 1). Upon BCR cross-linking CD22 molecules which are part of the BCR signalosome, such as is rapidly phosphorylated by the Src kinase Lyn (Smith et al. PLCγ, Btk or SLP65/BLNK showed unchanged tyrosine phos- at Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Z on August 3, 2016 1998). The phosphorylated ITIM residues of the CD22 tail are phorylation in Siglecg−/− B-1 cells (Hoffmann et al. 2007). The bound by the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1, a central inhibitory transcription factor NFATc1 has elevated expression levels in signaling molecule (Doody et al. 1995). SHP-1 is the main Siglecg−/− B-1 cells, which could be an autoregulatory process downstream effector of CD22 and CD22-deficient B cells show due to increased Ca2+ signaling (Jellusova and Nitschke 2012). increased tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins which One study also reported increased NF-kB activation in Siglecg−/− are involved in triggering proximal BCR signaling responses, B-1 cells, a finding that was not confirmed by another group such as SLP65/BLNK, Vav1 and CD19 (Fujimoto et al. 1999; (Ding et al. 2007; Jellusova and Nitschke 2012). Gerlach et al. 2003). Correspondingly, BCR-induced Ca2+ sig- Both CD22 and Siglec-G also modulate TLR signaling in B naling is strongly enhanced in Cd22−/− B cells (O’Keefe et al. cells. TLRs are pattern recognition receptors for bacterial or viral Fig. 1. Regulation of BCR signaling by CD22 and Siglec-G binding to sialic acids in cis.(A) CD22 is an inhibitor of BCR signaling on conventional B cells (B-2 cells).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Demonstrates the Molecular and Cellular Reprogramming of Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16164-1 OPEN Single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrates the molecular and cellular reprogramming of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma Nayoung Kim 1,2,3,13, Hong Kwan Kim4,13, Kyungjong Lee 5,13, Yourae Hong 1,6, Jong Ho Cho4, Jung Won Choi7, Jung-Il Lee7, Yeon-Lim Suh8,BoMiKu9, Hye Hyeon Eum 1,2,3, Soyean Choi 1, Yoon-La Choi6,10,11, Je-Gun Joung1, Woong-Yang Park 1,2,6, Hyun Ae Jung12, Jong-Mu Sun12, Se-Hoon Lee12, ✉ ✉ Jin Seok Ahn12, Keunchil Park12, Myung-Ju Ahn 12 & Hae-Ock Lee 1,2,3,6 1234567890():,; Advanced metastatic cancer poses utmost clinical challenges and may present molecular and cellular features distinct from an early-stage cancer. Herein, we present single-cell tran- scriptome profiling of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, the most prevalent histological lung cancer type diagnosed at stage IV in over 40% of all cases. From 208,506 cells populating the normal tissues or early to metastatic stage cancer in 44 patients, we identify a cancer cell subtype deviating from the normal differentiation trajectory and dominating the metastatic stage. In all stages, the stromal and immune cell dynamics reveal ontological and functional changes that create a pro-tumoral and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Normal resident myeloid cell populations are gradually replaced with monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells, along with T-cell exhaustion. This extensive single-cell analysis enhances our understanding of molecular and cellular dynamics in metastatic lung cancer and reveals potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets in cancer-microenvironment interactions. 1 Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set
    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion genes data set PROBE Entrez Gene ID Celera Gene ID Gene_Symbol Gene_Name 160832 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 223658 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 212988 102 hCG40040.3 ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 133411 4185 hCG28232.2 ADAM11 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 11 110695 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 195222 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 165344 8751 hCG20021.3 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 189065 6868 null ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (tumor necrosis factor, alpha, converting enzyme) 108119 8728 hCG15398.4 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 117763 8748 hCG20675.3 ADAM20 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 20 126448 8747 hCG1785634.2 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 208981 8747 hCG1785634.2|hCG2042897 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 180903 53616 hCG17212.4 ADAM22 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 177272 8745 hCG1811623.1 ADAM23 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 23 102384 10863 hCG1818505.1 ADAM28 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 119968 11086 hCG1786734.2 ADAM29 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 29 205542 11085 hCG1997196.1 ADAM30 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 30 148417 80332 hCG39255.4 ADAM33 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 140492 8756 hCG1789002.2 ADAM7 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 7 122603 101 hCG1816947.1 ADAM8 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 8 183965 8754 hCG1996391 ADAM9 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9 (meltrin gamma) 129974 27299 hCG15447.3 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like,
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early
    Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Stratify Clinical Response to csDMARD-Therapy and Predict Radiographic Progression Frances Humby1,* Myles Lewis1,* Nandhini Ramamoorthi2, Jason Hackney3, Michael Barnes1, Michele Bombardieri1, Francesca Setiadi2, Stephen Kelly1, Fabiola Bene1, Maria di Cicco1, Sudeh Riahi1, Vidalba Rocher-Ros1, Nora Ng1, Ilias Lazorou1, Rebecca E. Hands1, Desiree van der Heijde4, Robert Landewé5, Annette van der Helm-van Mil4, Alberto Cauli6, Iain B. McInnes7, Christopher D. Buckley8, Ernest Choy9, Peter Taylor10, Michael J. Townsend2 & Costantino Pitzalis1 1Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. Departments of 2Biomarker Discovery OMNI, 3Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA 4Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands 5Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Policlinico of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 7Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK 8Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing (IIA), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK 9Institute of
    [Show full text]
  • Flow Reagents Single Color Antibodies CD Chart
    CD CHART CD N° Alternative Name CD N° Alternative Name CD N° Alternative Name Beckman Coulter Clone Beckman Coulter Clone Beckman Coulter Clone T Cells B Cells Granulocytes NK Cells Macrophages/Monocytes Platelets Erythrocytes Stem Cells Dendritic Cells Endothelial Cells Epithelial Cells T Cells B Cells Granulocytes NK Cells Macrophages/Monocytes Platelets Erythrocytes Stem Cells Dendritic Cells Endothelial Cells Epithelial Cells T Cells B Cells Granulocytes NK Cells Macrophages/Monocytes Platelets Erythrocytes Stem Cells Dendritic Cells Endothelial Cells Epithelial Cells CD1a T6, R4, HTA1 Act p n n p n n S l CD99 MIC2 gene product, E2 p p p CD223 LAG-3 (Lymphocyte activation gene 3) Act n Act p n CD1b R1 Act p n n p n n S CD99R restricted CD99 p p CD224 GGT (γ-glutamyl transferase) p p p p p p CD1c R7, M241 Act S n n p n n S l CD100 SEMA4D (semaphorin 4D) p Low p p p n n CD225 Leu13, interferon induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1). p p p p p CD1d R3 Act S n n Low n n S Intest CD101 V7, P126 Act n p n p n n p CD226 DNAM-1, PTA-1 Act n Act Act Act n p n CD1e R2 n n n n S CD102 ICAM-2 (intercellular adhesion molecule-2) p p n p Folli p CD227 MUC1, mucin 1, episialin, PUM, PEM, EMA, DF3, H23 Act p CD2 T11; Tp50; sheep red blood cell (SRBC) receptor; LFA-2 p S n p n n l CD103 HML-1 (human mucosal lymphocytes antigen 1), integrin aE chain S n n n n n n n l CD228 Melanotransferrin (MT), p97 p p CD3 T3, CD3 complex p n n n n n n n n n l CD104 integrin b4 chain; TSP-1180 n n n n n n n p p CD229 Ly9, T-lymphocyte surface antigen p p n p n
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Potential Key Genes and Pathway Linked with Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Based on Integrated Bioinformatics Analyses
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.20248688; this version posted December 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Identification of potential key genes and pathway linked with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease based on integrated bioinformatics analyses Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 , Iranna Kotturshetti 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karanataka, India. 3. Department of Ayurveda, Rajiv Gandhi Education Society`s Ayurvedic Medical College, Ron, Karnataka 562209, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.20248688; this version posted December 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) is neurodegenerative disease also called prion disease linked with poor prognosis. The aim of the current study was to illuminate the underlying molecular mechanisms of sCJD. The mRNA microarray dataset GSE124571 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Lectins, Their Carbohydrate Affinities and Where to Find Them
    biomolecules Review Human Lectins, Their Carbohydrate Affinities and Where to Review HumanFind Them Lectins, Their Carbohydrate Affinities and Where to FindCláudia ThemD. Raposo 1,*, André B. Canelas 2 and M. Teresa Barros 1 1, 2 1 Cláudia D. Raposo * , Andr1 é LAQVB. Canelas‐Requimte,and Department M. Teresa of Chemistry, Barros NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829‐516 Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] 12 GlanbiaLAQV-Requimte,‐AgriChemWhey, Department Lisheen of Chemistry, Mine, Killoran, NOVA Moyne, School E41 of ScienceR622 Co. and Tipperary, Technology, Ireland; canelas‐ [email protected] NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] 2* Correspondence:Glanbia-AgriChemWhey, [email protected]; Lisheen Mine, Tel.: Killoran, +351‐212948550 Moyne, E41 R622 Tipperary, Ireland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +351-212948550 Abstract: Lectins are a class of proteins responsible for several biological roles such as cell‐cell in‐ Abstract:teractions,Lectins signaling are pathways, a class of and proteins several responsible innate immune for several responses biological against roles pathogens. such as Since cell-cell lec‐ interactions,tins are able signalingto bind to pathways, carbohydrates, and several they can innate be a immuneviable target responses for targeted against drug pathogens. delivery Since sys‐ lectinstems. In are fact, able several to bind lectins to carbohydrates, were approved they by canFood be and a viable Drug targetAdministration for targeted for drugthat purpose. delivery systems.Information In fact, about several specific lectins carbohydrate were approved recognition by Food by andlectin Drug receptors Administration was gathered for that herein, purpose. plus Informationthe specific organs about specific where those carbohydrate lectins can recognition be found by within lectin the receptors human was body.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Long Non-Coding RNA Expression Reveals Novel Mediators
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Assessment of long non‑coding RNA expression reveals novel mediators of the lung tumour immune response Adam P. Sage1,5, Kevin W. Ng1,5, Erin A. Marshall1*, Greg L. Stewart1, Brenda C. Minatel1, Katey S. S. Enfeld1, Spencer D. Martin1, Carolyn J. Brown2, Ninan Abraham3,4 & Wan L. Lam1 The tumour immune microenvironment is a crucial mediator of lung tumourigenesis, and characterizing the immune landscape of patient tumours may guide immunotherapy treatment regimens and uncover novel intervention points. We sought to identify the landscape of tumour‑ infltrating immune cells in the context of long non‑coding RNA (lncRNAs), known regulators of gene expression. We examined the lncRNA profles of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) tumours by interrogating RNA sequencing data from microdissected and non‑microdissected samples (BCCRC and TCGA). Subsequently, analysis of single‑cell RNA sequencing data from lung tumours and fow‑ sorted healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells identifed lncRNAs in immune cells, highlighting their biological and prognostic relevance. We discovered lncRNA expression patterns indicative of regulatory relationships with immune‑related protein‑coding genes, including the relationship between AC008750.1 and NKG7 in NK cells. Activation of NK cells in vitro was sufcient to induce AC008750.1 expression. Finally, siRNA‑mediated knockdown of AC008750.1 signifcantly impaired both the expression of NKG7 and the anti‑tumour capacity of NK cells. We present an atlas of cancer‑ cell extrinsic immune cell‑expressed lncRNAs, in vitro evidence for a functional role of lncRNAs in anti‑ tumour immune activity, which upon further exploration may reveal novel clinical utility as markers of immune infltration.
    [Show full text]
  • Siglec10 As an Immunosuppressive and Tumorgenesis Signature for Prediction of Survival Prognosis in Gliomas
    Siglec10 as an Immunosuppressive and Tumorgenesis Signature for Prediction of Survival Prognosis in Gliomas Yanyan Feng Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Yuxiang Zhang Capital Medical University Sanbo Brain Hospital Ting Wang Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Yuyin Feng Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Hesong Wang Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Kai Yuan ( [email protected] ) Beijing University of Chinese Medicine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7239-449X Primary research Keywords: Siglec10, prognosis, glioma, mechanism, biomarker Posted Date: July 14th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-40997/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/17 Abstract Background Glioma is a type of tumor occurring in central nervous system. Specic factors mutations and molecular abnormalities are used to conduct glioma classication and clinical decision in recent decade. Siglec10 is a member of sialic acid binding immunoglobulin superfamily. Methods We analyzed the siglec10 expression in glioma patients with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining method and evaluated the survival prognosis. Bioinformatic datasets including TCGA and CGGA were used to validate the IHC results. Functional enrichment analysis including GO, KEGG, and GSEA were conducted to study the related mechanism of siglec10, either. Results High siglec10 expression had shorter survival prognosis than low siglec10 expression in patients especially with malignant gliomas. Bioinformatic datasets including TCGA and CGGA validated the IHC results and discovered the expression of siglec10 was higher in malignant subtype than benign subtype of gliomas. So, siglec10 contributes to the poor prognosis of gliomas. Furthermore, the related mechanisms of siglec10 in gliomas were investigated by functional enrichment analysis including GSEA, GO, and KEGG analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Figure 1. Protein-Protein Interaction Network with Increased Expression in Fteb During the Luteal Phase
    Supplemental Figure 1. Protein-protein interaction network with increased expression in FTEb during the luteal phase. Supplemental Figure 2. Protein-protein interaction network with decreased expression in FTEb during luteal phase. LEGENDS TO SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES Supplemental Figure 1. Protein-protein interaction network with increased expression in FTEb during the luteal phase. Submission of probe sets differentially expressed in the FTEb specimens that clustered with SerCa as well as those specifically altered in FTEb luteal samples to the online I2D database revealed overlapping networks of proteins with increased expression in the four FTEb samples and/or FTEb luteal samples overall. Proteins are represented by nodes, and known and predicted first-degree interactions are represented by solid lines. Genes encoding proteins shown as large ovals highlighted in blue were exclusively found in the first comparison (Manuscript Figure 2), whereas those highlighted in red were only found in the second comparison (Manuscript Figure 3). Genes encoding proteins shown as large ovals highlighted in black were found in both comparisons. The color of each node indicates the ontology of the corresponding protein as determined by the Online Predicted Human Interaction Database (OPHID) link with the NAViGaTOR software. Supplemental Figure 2. Protein-protein interaction network with decreased expression in FTEb during the luteal phase. Submission of probe sets differentially expressed in the FTEb specimens that clustered with SerCa as well as those specifically altered in FTEb luteal samples to the online I2D database revealed overlapping networks of proteins with decreased expression in the four FTEb samples and/or FTEb luteal samples overall. Proteins are represented by nodes, and known and predicted first-degree interactions are represented by solid lines.
    [Show full text]
  • CD System of Surface Molecules
    THE CD SYSTEM OF LEUKOCYTE APPENDIX 4A SURFACE MOLECULES Monoclonal Antibodies to Human Cell Surface Antigens APPENDIX 4A Alice Beare,1 Hannes Stockinger,2 Heddy Zola,1 and Ian Nicholson1 1Women’s and Children’s Health Research Institute, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, Australia 2Institute of Immunology, University of Vienna, Vienna ABSTRACT Many of the leukocyte cell surface molecules are known by “CD” numbers. In this Appendix, a short introduction describes the history and the use of CD nomenclature and provides a few key references to enable access to the wider literature. This is followed by a table that lists all human molecules with approved CD names, tabulating alternative names, key structural features, cellular expression, major known functions, and usefulness of the molecules or antibodies against them in research or clinical applications. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 80:A.4A.1-A.4A.73. C 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Keywords: CD nomenclature r HLDA r HCDM r leukocyte marker r human leukocyte differentiation r antigens INTRODUCTION During the last 25 years, large numbers of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been pro- duced that have facilitated the purification and functional characterization of a plethora of leukocyte surface molecules. The antibodies have been even more useful as markers for cell populations, allowing the counting, separation, and functional study of numer- ous subsets of cells of the immune system. A series of international workshops were instrumental in coordinating this development through multi-laboratory “blind” studies of thousands of antibodies. These HLDA (Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens) Workshops have, up until now, defined 500 different entities and assigned them cluster of differentiation (CD) designations.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of B Cell Functions by the Sialic Acid-Binding Receptors Siglec-G and CD22
    REVIEW ARTICLE published: 11 January 2012 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00096 Regulation of B cell functions by the sialic acid-binding receptors Siglec-G and CD22 Julia Jellusova† and Lars Nitschke* Chair of Genetics, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany Edited by: B cell antigen receptor (BCR) engagement can lead to many different physiologic outcomes. Anthony L. DeFranco, University of To achieve an appropriate response, the BCR signal is interpreted in the context of other California San Francisco, USA stimuli and several additional receptors on the B cell surface participate in the modulation Reviewed by: Pablo Engel, University of Barcelona, of the signal. Two members of the Siglec (sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin) Spain family, CD22 and Siglec-G have been shown to inhibit the BCR signal. Recent findings indi- I-Hsin Su, Nanyang Technological cate that the ability of these two receptors to bind sialic acids might be important to induce University, Singapore tolerance to self-antigens. Sialylated glycans are usually absent on microbes but abundant *Correspondence: in higher vertebrates and might therefore provide an important tolerogenic signal. Since Lars Nitschke, Chair of Genetics, University of Erlangen, Staudtstr. 5, the expression of the specific ligands for Siglec-G and CD22 is tightly regulated and since 91058 Erlangen, Germany. Siglecs are not only able to bind their ligands in trans but also on the same cell surface this e-mail: nitschke@biologie. might provide additional mechanisms to control the BCR signal. Although both Siglec-G uni-erlangen.de and CD22 are expressed on B cells and are able to inhibit BCR mediated signaling, they †Present address: also show unique biological functions.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Disease
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Disease-specific differences in glycosylation of mouse and human skeletal muscle A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the Degree of Philosophy in Cellular and Molecular Pathology by Brian James McMorran 2017 © Copyright by Brian James McMorran 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Disease-specific differences in glycosylation of mouse and human skeletal muscle by Brian James McMorran Doctor of Philosophy in Cellular and Molecular Pathology University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Linda G. Baum, Chair Proper glycosylation of proteins at the muscle cell membrane, or sarcolemma, is critical for proper muscle function. The laminin receptor alpha-dystroglycan (α-DG) is heavily glycosylated and mutations in 24 genes involved in proper α-DG glycosylation have been identified as causing various forms of congenital muscular dystrophy. While work over the past decade has elucidated the structure bound by laminin and the enzymes required for its creation, very little is known about muscle glycosylation outside of α-DG glycosylation. The modification of glycan structures with terminal GalNAc residues at the rodent neuromuscular junction (NMJ) has remained the focus of work in mouse muscle glycosylation, while qualitative lectin histochemistry studies performed three decades ago represent the majority of human muscle glycosylation research. This thesis quantifies differentiation-, species-, and disease-specific differences in mouse and human skeletal muscle glycosylation. Following differentiation of mouse myotubes, increased binding was found of lectins specific for GalNAc and O-glycans. Additionally, ii analysis of binding preferences of four GalNAc-specific lectins, which historically have been used to identify the rodent NMJ, identified differences in the glycan types bound on distinct glycoproteins by each lectin.
    [Show full text]