Kant's Critique of Judgement Macmillan and Co., Limited London
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
KANT'S CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED LONDON . BOMBAY - CALCUTPA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YOPK . BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS - SAN FRANCISCO THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, LTD. TORONTO KANT’S CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT TRANSLATED WITHINTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY J. H. BERNARD, D.D., D.C.L. BISHOP OF OSSORY SOMBTIMRFBLLOW OF ‘TRINITY COLLEGB, AND ARCHBISHOP KING’S PROFESSOR OF DNlNITV IN THE UNlVERSITV OF DUDLIK SECOND ED/ TZON, RE VZSED MACMILLANAND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN’S STREET, LONDON 1914 COPYRIGHT First Edition 1892 Second Edirion 1914 CONTENTS PAGE EDITOR'SINTRODUCTION . xi PREF-4CE . 1 INTRODUCTION . 7 I. Of the division of Philosophy 7 11. Of the realm of Philosophy in general i1 III. Of the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole . 14 IV. Of Judgement as a faculty legislating apn'opi 17 v. The principle of theformal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgement. 20 VI. Of thecombination of thefeeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature. 27 VII. Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness. of nature . 30 VIII. Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature . 35 IX. Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgement . 39 FIRSTPART.-~RITIQUE OF THE AESTHETICALJUDGEMENT 43 First Divieiolr.-Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement . 45 Firjt Book-Analytic of the Beautiful 45 Fivst Mment of the judgement of taste, according to quality . 45 8 I. The judgement of taste is aesthetical 45 5 2. The satisfaction which determines the judgement of taste is disinterested 46 5 3. The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest . 48 5 4. The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest 50 V vi CONTENTS PAGE 5. Comparison of thethree specifically different kinds of satisfaction . 53 SecondMolnentofthe judgement oftaste,viz.according toquantity 55 8 6. The Beautiful is that which apart fromconcepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction . 55 5 7. Comparison of the Beautiful with thePleasant and the Good by means of the abovecharacteristic . 57 J 8. The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgement of Taste only as subjective . 59 9. Investigation of the question whether in a judgement of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object . 63 Third Moment of judgements of taste according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein . 67 5 IO. Of purposiveness in general . 67 J I I. The judgement of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) . 69 $ 12. The judgement of taste rests on u$v-ion. grounds . 70 3 13. The pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion 72 J 14. Elucidation by means of examples . 73 5 IS. The judgement of taste is quiteindependent of the concept of perfection . 77 3 16. The judgement of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful underthe condition of a definite concept, is not pure 5 17.Of theIdeal of Beauty . Fou~thMoment of the judgement of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object . 91 § 18. What the modality in a judgement of taste is 9' 1 19. The subjective necessity which we ascribe tothe judgement of taste is conditioned . 92 5 20. The condition of necessity which a judgement of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense 92 5 z I. Have we ground for presupposing a common sense ? 93 § 22. The necessity of theuniversal agreement that is thought in a judgement of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense . 94 CONTENTS vii PAGE Gemrd remark on the first section of the Analytic . 96 Secom.2 Book-Analytic of the Sublime . i01 5 23. Transitionfrom the faculty which judges of the Beautiful tothat which judges of the Sublime . i01 3 24. Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the Sublime 105 . A-Of the MathematicallySublime . I 06 5 25. Explanation of the term 6' Sublime " . I 06 26. Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite forthe Idea of the Sublime . I IO 5 27. Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgements upon the Sublime . B.-Of the Dynamically Sublime in Nature . 5 28. Of Nature regarded as Might 5 29. Of the modality of the judgement upon the sublime in nature . Genrral remark upon the exposition of the aesthetical reflective Judgement Deduction of [pure] aesthetical judgements . 5 30. The Deduction of aesthetiml judgements on the objects of nature must not be directedto what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful § 3 I. Of the method of deduction of judgements of taste . 5 32. First peculiarity of the judgement of taste . 5 33. Second peculiarity of the judgement of taste . § 34. There is no objective principle of taste possible . § 35. The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgement in general . 161 § 36. Of the problem of a Deduction of judgements of Taste 162 5 37. What is properly asserted a #&n' of an object in a judgement of taste . § 38. Deduction of judgements of taste . $ 39. Of the communicability of a sensation 5 40. Of taste as a kind of senspcs communis 5 41. Of the empiricalinterest in the Beautiful . 5 42. Of the intellectual interest in the Beautiful . 43. Of Artin general . $j44. Of beautiful Art . .. 45. Beautiful art is an art in so far as it seems like nature 5 46. Beautiful art is theart of genius . ... VI11 CONTENTS 3 47. Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius . 48. Of the relation of Genius to Taste . $ 49. Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius . 5 50. Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art . 5 I. Of the division of the beautiful art5 . 5 52. Of the combination ofbeautiful arts in one and the sameproduct . 5 53. Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts . 5 54. Remark . Second Didon.-Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgement . 229 5 55. 229 3 56. Representation of the antinomy of Taste . 230 $ 57. Solution of the antinomy of Taste . 231 § 58. Of the Idealism of the purposiveness of both Nature andArt as the unique principle of theaesthetical Judgement. 241 J 59. Of Beauty as the symbol of Morality . 248 5 60. Appendk-Ofthe method of Taste ' 253 SECOND PART."CRITIQUEOF THETELEOLOGICALJUDGEMENT 2 57 3 61. Of the objective purposiveness of .Nature . 259 First Divieion.-Analytic of the Teleological Judgement . 262 Of the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguishedfrom that which is material . 262 Of the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of nature . ,268 Of the peculiar character of things as natural purposes 272 Thingsregarded as natural purposes are organised beings . 275 Of the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised beings organised in . 280 Of the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a system of purposes . 282 Of the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science natural . 287 COATENTS ix Seeond Divinia-Dialectic of the Teleological Judgement . $ 69. What is an antinomy of theJudgement ? . $ 70. Representation of thisantinomy . $ 71. Preliminary to the solution of the aboveantinomy . 5 72. Of the different systems which deal with the purposive- ness of Nature . 5 73. None of the above systems give what they pretend . 5 74. The reason that we cannottreat the concept of a Technic of nature dogmatically is the fact that a natural purposeis inexplicable . 5 75. The concept of an objective purposiveness of nature is a critical principle of Reason for the reflective Judgement 309 $ 76. Remark . 313 5 77. Of the peculiarity of thehuman Understanding, by means of which the concept of a natural purpose is possible . 3'9 5 78. Of the union of the principle of the universal mechanism of matter with the teleological principle in theTechnic of nature . 326 bgwndix.-Methodology of the Teleological Judgement 334 § 79. Whether Teleology must be treated as if it belonged to the doctrine the of nature . 334 5 80. Of the necessary subordination of the mechanical to the teleological principle in the explanation of a thing as a naturalpurpose . 336 9 81. Of the association of mechanism with the teleological principle in the explanationof a natural purpose as a natural product natural . 342 82. Of the teleological system in the external relations of organised beings organised . 346 5 83. Of the ultimatepurpose of natureas a teleological system . 352 84. Of the final purpose of the existence of a world, is. of creation itself . 359 8 85. Of Physico-theology . 362 X COiVTENTS J 86. Of Ethico-theology . § 87. Of the moralproof of the Being of God . 88. Limitation of the validity of the moral proof . 89. Of the use of the moralargument . 9 90. Of thekind of belief in a teleological proofof the BeingGod of . 395 5 91. Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith . 403 Genera2 remark on Teleology . 414 EDITORSINTRODUCTION THEREare not wanting indicationsthat public in- terest in the Critical Philosophy has been quickened of recentdays in thesecountries, as well as in America. To lighten the toil of penetrating through the wilderness of Kant’s long sentences, the English student has now many aids, which those who began their studies fifteen or twenty years ago did not enjoy.Translations, paraphrases, criticisms, have been published in considerable numbers; so that if it is notyet true that “he who runsmay read,” it may at least be said that a patient student of ordinaryindustry and intelligencehas his way made plain before him.