DOCSLIB.ORG

Callaway Plant, Unit 1, Revised Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Callaway Plant, Unit 1, Revised Site CALLAWAY - SA TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 2.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS Section Page 2.1 GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY ............................................................. 2.1-1 2.1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ..................................................... 2.1-1 2.1.1.1 Specification of Location ...................................................................... 2.1-1 2.1.1.2 Site Area Map....................................................................................... 2.1-1 2.1.1.3 Boundaries for Establishing Effluent Release Limits............................ 2.1-9 2.1.2 EXCLUSION AREA AUTHORITY AND CONTROL .................................. 2.1-9 2.1.2.1 Authority ............................................................................................... 2.1-9 2.1.2.2 Control of Activities Unrelated to Plant Operation................................ 2.1-9 2.1.2.3 Arrangements for Traffic Control........................................................ 2.1-10 2.1.2.4 Abandonment or Relocation of Roads ............................................... 2.1-10 2.1.3 POPULATION AND POPULATION DISTRIBUTION .............................. 2.1-10 2.1.3.1 Population Within 10 Miles................................................................. 2.1-11 2.1.3.2 Population Between 10 and 50 Miles................................................. 2.1-12 2.1.3.3 Transient Population .......................................................................... 2.1-13 2.1.3.4 Low Population Zone.......................................................................... 2.1-13 2.1.3.5 Population Center............................................................................... 2.1-14 2.1.3.6 Population Density ............................................................................. 2.1-14 2.1.3.7 Projections of Industrial Growth ......................................................... 2.1-15 2.2 NEARBY INDUSTRIAL, TRANSPORTATION, AND MILITARY FACILITIES..................................................................................................... 2.2-1 2.2.1 LOCATIONS AND ROUTES ..................................................................... 2.2-1 2.2.1.1 Military Facilities................................................................................... 2.2-1 2.2.1.2 Manufacturing Plants, Storage Facilities, and Mining .......................... 2.2-1 2.2.1.3 Airports and Air Routes ........................................................................ 2.2-5 2.2.1.4 Land Transportation Routes................................................................. 2.2-6 2.2.1.5 Water Transportation............................................................................ 2.2-7 2.2.1.6 Pipelines............................................................................................... 2.2-7 2.0-i CALLAWAY - SA TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Page 2.2.2 DESCRIPTIONS........................................................................................ 2.2-8 2.2.2.1 Hydrogen System................................................................................. 2.2-8 2.2.3 EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL ACCIDENTS ......................................... 2.2-10 2.2.3.1 Design Basis Events .......................................................................... 2.2-10 2.3 METEOROLOGY............................................................................................ 2.3-1 2.3.1 REGIONAL CLIMATOLOGY ..................................................................... 2.3-1 2.3.1.1 General Climate ................................................................................... 2.3-1 2.3.1.2 Regional Meterological Conditions for Design and Operating Bases... 2.3-2 2.3.2 LOCAL METEOROLOGY........................................................................ 2.3-19 2.3.2.1 Normal and Extreme Values of Meteorological.................................. 2.3-20 2.3.2.2 Potential Influence of the Plant and Its Facilities on Local Meteorology........................................................................................ 2.3-28 2.3.3 ON-SITE METEOROLOGICAL MEASUREMENT PROGRAMS ............ 2.3-48 2.3.3.1 Preoperational and Operational Monitoring Programs....................... 2.3-48 2.3.3.2 Representativeness of the Data Base................................................ 2.3-58 2.3.4 SHORT-TERM DIFFUSION ESTIMATES............................................... 2.3-59 2.3.4.1 Objective ............................................................................................ 2.3-59 2.3.4.2 Calculations........................................................................................ 2.3-60 2.3.4.3 Data Representativeness................................................................... 2.3-63 2.3.5 LONG-TERM DIFFUSION ESTIMATES ................................................. 2.3-64 2.3.5.1 Objective ............................................................................................ 2.3-64 2.3.5.2 Calculations........................................................................................ 2.3-64 2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING...................................................................... 2.4-1 2.4.1 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION................................................................. 2.4-1 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities ................................................................................. 2.4-1 2.0-ii CALLAWAY - SA TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Page 2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere......................................................................................... 2.4-2 2.4.2 FLOODS.................................................................................................... 2.4-7 2.4.2.1 Flood History ........................................................................................ 2.4-7 2.4.2.2 Flood Design Considerations ............................................................... 2.4-8 2.4.2.3 Effects of Local Intense Precipitation ................................................... 2.4-9 2.4.3 PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD (PMF) ON STREAMS AND RIVERS... 2.4-14 2.4.3.1 Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) ............................................ 2.4-15 2.4.3.2 Precipitation Losses ........................................................................... 2.4-15 2.4.3.3 Runoff and Stream Course Models.................................................... 2.4-15 2.4.3.4 Probable Maximum Flood Flow.......................................................... 2.4-16 2.4.3.5 Water Level Determinations............................................................... 2.4-16 2.4.3.6 Coincident Wind Wave Activity........................................................... 2.4-20 2.4.4 POTENTIAL DAM FAILURES, SEISMICALLY INDUCED ...................... 2.4-20 2.4.4.1 Reservoir Descriptions ....................................................................... 2.4-20 2.4.4.2 Dam Failure Permutations.................................................................. 2.4-21 2.4.4.3 Unsteady Flow Analysis of Potential Dam Failures............................ 2.4-22 2.4.4.4 Water Level at Plant Site.................................................................... 2.4-23 2.4.5 PROBABLE MAXIMUM SURGE AND SEICHE FLOODING .................. 2.4-23 2.4.6 PROBABLE MAXIMUM TSUNAMI FLOODING...................................... 2.4-23 2.4.7 ICE EFFECTS ......................................................................................... 2.4-24 2.4.7.1 UHS Retention Pond.......................................................................... 2.4-24 2.4.7.2 UHS Pond Structures......................................................................... 2.4-24 2.4.7.3 River Structures.................................................................................. 2.4-25 2.4.8 COOLING WATER CANALS AND RESERVOIRS.................................. 2.4-25 2.4.8.1 Canals ................................................................................................ 2.4-25 2.4.8.2 Reservoirs .......................................................................................... 2.4-25 2.4.9 CHANNEL DIVERSIONS ........................................................................ 2.4-29 2.4.10 FLOODING PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS ....................................... 2.4-30 2.0-iii CALLAWAY - SA TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Page 2.4.11 LOW WATER CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... 2.4-30 2.4.11.1 Low Flow in Streams.......................................................................... 2.4-30 2.4.11.2 Low Water Resulting from Surges, Seiches or Tsunami.................... 2.4-32 2.4.11.3 Historical Low Water .......................................................................... 2.4-32 2.4.11.4 Future Controls................................................................................... 2.4-32 2.4.11.5 Plant Requirements............................................................................ 2.4-35 2.4.11.6 Heat Sink Dependability Requirements.............................................. 2.4-37 2.4.12 DISPERSION, DILUTION, AND TRAVEL TIMES OF ACCIDENTAL RELEASES OF LIQUID EFFLUENTS IN SURFACE WATERS.............. 2.4-39 2.4.12.1 Accident Effects.................................................................................. 2.4-39 2.4.13 GROUND WATER................................................................................... 2.4-42 2.4.13.1 Description and On Site Use.............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Data Sources in Connecticut Patricia A
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station Resources 1-1982 Climate Data Sources in Connecticut Patricia A. Palley University of Connecticut - Storrs David R. Miller University of Connecticut - Storrs Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes Part of the Climate Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Palley, Patricia A. and Miller, David R., "Climate Data Sources in Connecticut" (1982). Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station. 80. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes/80 Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 461 Climate Data Sources in Connecticut By Patricia A Palley, Assistant State Climatologist and David R. Miller, Associate Professor of Natural Resources JAN 1982 STORRS AGRICULTURAL EXPERI MENT STATION COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, STORRS. CT 06268 TABLE OF CONTENTS Int roduction . 1 Types of Weather Stations 2 Parameters Measur ed 3 Summary of Climate Observations in Connecticu t 5 How to Use the Maps and Site Reports • • • • • 7 Table I Record Lengths, by parameter, of all weather stat ions i n Conn., state summary 8 Table II Record Lengths , by parame ter, of all weather stations in Conn . , by county . 9 Table III Record Lengths, by paramet er, of Nationa l Wea ther Service operat ed and coope rative stations in Conn., by county . • . 10 Table IV Re cord Lengths , by par ameter , of pr ivate data collect ors i n Conn ., by county . • . 11 Figure I Distribution of stations t hat measure rainfall . 12 Figur e II Distribution of stations t hat meas ure s nowf all .
    [Show full text]
  • Lake of the Ozarks 303D – 2021
    March 22, 2021 Jeff Robichaud Water, Wetlands, and Pesticides Division US EPA Region 7 11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, KS 66219 RE: EPA Proposed Decision on Missouri’s 2020 303(d) List Dear Mr. Robichaud: On behalf of the Missouri Corn Growers Association (MCGA) and the Missouri Soybean Association (MSA) we would like to thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed decision on Missouri’s 2020 303(d) List of Impaired Waters (hereinafter called the 2020 303d list). In addition to our comments, MSA and MCGA also fully supports comments submitted by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (Department) and the Missouri Clean Water Commission (CWC). For over 50 years, MCGA and MSA has worked with several generations of crop farmers to achieve major milestones and advances in Missouri’s agriculture industry. As grassroots organizations, MCGA & MSA invests considerable time and resources in supporting and promoting policies, education and research that is advancing crop production, sustaining grower profitability and improving environmental stewardship. MCGA and MSA are committed to working with both our growers and governmental partners in developing policies, practices and technology that benefit Missouri farmers and their local communities. MCGA and MSA purposely engaged on Missouri’s lake numeric nutrient criteria (Lake NNC) rule at a very early stage. Contributing technical expertise and suggestions on policy development, our staff participated on stakeholder committees and met directly with Department and EPA staff, voicing our positions, providing farmer perspectives, and contributing to the rule’s content and eventual adoption. We, along with many other agriculture, industry and municipal stakeholder groups, understood the importance of getting the Lake NNC rule developed right for Missouri, and more importantly, understood the potential unintended consequences of getting it wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Harry S. Truman Lake Brochure
    Evidence gathered from the Pleistocene Spring Bogs on the Pomme de Terre River indicates that approximately 30,000 years ago, during the last glacial period, animals such as the mastodon, tapir, musk ox, ground sloth, and giant beaver roamed the upper Osage Basin. During this period, spruce forests covered the area and the climate was much colder than today. The earliest mention of the Osage River was by Marquette, but the first known scientific expedition to the Osage River was in 1719 by Charles Du Tisne, who named the river for the Osage Indians. The Osage River was used as a part of the Santa Fe Trail. The trail was an The Corps of Engineers is responsible for important shipping route for the gold and silver operating and managing land and water mines in New Mexico and Arizona. resources at Truman Lake. The natural resource The rush of pioneer settlers began about management program is designed to protect 1831. Settlements were made along the Osage, and enhance the natural and cultural resources South Grand, Pomme de Terre, Weaubleau and provide visitors with quality recreational Creek, Sac River, Monegaw Creek, and opportunities. Clear Creek. These streams were the major Land management policies and practices transportation routes for shipping logs, produce, provide for the maintenance and protection and supplies. of wildlife habitat. Prescribed burns are used Warsaw and Fairfield, both of which were to convert old fields and fescue pastures into stops on the Butterfield Stage Line, were platted beneficial stands of native grass. One of in 1837. Osceola became a shipping point the most important tools utilized in wildlife for merchandise from the river boats.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Days Events Eagle Watching on Your
    http://www.MSCNews.net/news/index.cfm?nk=65977 Discover nature with MDC through Eagle Days From December through February, Missouri's winter eagle watching is spectacular. Discover nature with the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) through Eagle Days events around the state, or enjoy eagle viewing on your own. Because of the state’s big rivers, many lakes, and abundant wetlands, Missouri is one of the leading lower 48 states for bald eagle viewing. Each fall, thousands of these great birds migrate south from their nesting range in Canada and the Great Lakes states to hunt in the Show-Me State. Eagles take up residence wherever they find open water and plentiful food. More than 2,000 bald eagles are typically reported in Missouri during winter. Eagle Days Events MDC Eagle Days events are listed below. They include live captive-eagle programs, exhibits, activities, videos, and guides with spotting scopes. Watch for eagles perched in large trees along the water's edge. View them early in the morning to see eagles flying and fishing. Be sure to dress for winter weather and don't forget cameras and binoculars. MOUND CITY: Dec. 1 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. and Dec. 2 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at Loess Bluffs National Wildlife Refuge near Mound City. Call 816-271-3100 for more information. KANSAS CITY: 5 from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. and Jan. 6 from 10:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. at Smithville Lake Paradise Pointe Golf Course Clubhouse north of Kansas City.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv., Interior § 32.44
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv., Interior § 32.44 11. With the exception of raccoon hunting, refuge in accordance with State regulations we limit refuge entry and exit to the period and subject to the following conditions: of 4 a.m. to 11⁄2 hours after legal sunset. 1. Conditions A1 through A16, and B4 apply. 12. For instances of lost or stolen public 2. We prohibit organized drives for deer and use permits (name/address/phone number), feral hog. management may issue duplicates at their 3. Hunting or shooting within or adjacent discretion, and may charge a fee. to open fields or tree plantations less than 5 13. Valid T R Complex Annual Public Use feet (1.5 meters) in height must be from a Permit (name/address/phone number) holders stand a minimum of 10 feet (3 meters) above may incidentally take opossum, coyote, bea- the ground. ver, bobcat, nutria, and feral hog in any ref- 4. Deer check station dates, locations, and uge hunt season with weapons legal for that requirements are designated in the refuge hunt. brochure. Prior to leaving the refuge, you 14. We prohibit all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), must check all harvested deer at the nearest utility-type vehicles (UTVs), horses, and self-service check station following the post- mules are prohibited. ed instructions. 15. We prohibit hunting over or the place- 5. Hunters may possess and hunt from only ment of bait (see § 32.2(h)). We prohibit the one stand or blind. Hunters may place a deer possession, direct or indirect placing, expos- stand or blind 48 hours prior to a hunt and ing, depositing, or scattering of any salt, must remove it within 48 hours after each grain, powder, liquid, or other feed substance designated hunt with the exception of closed to attract game.
    [Show full text]
  • R1090) Cullimore Family
    Information Sheet R Cullimore family. 1090 Collection, 1973-1992. Four folders. This collection is available at The State Historical Society of Missouri. If you would like more information, please contact us at [email protected]. These are papers of the Cullimore family of journalists and outdoor writers. The collection consists of correspondence between Donald B. “Rocky” Cullimore and Dan Saults, and a compi- lation of Saults’s articles in Branson and Springfield, Missouri, newspapers. This collection represents the first installment of what will be a much larger assemblage of Cullimore family papers. It centers on conservationist and author Dan Saults, a close friend of the Cullimore family, and supplements materials in the Saults collection (WHMC-Rolla R403). Saults was a leader in promoting conservation efforts in Missouri. A native of Knob Noster, Mis- souri, he bought the Knob Noster Weekly Gem after graduating from the University of Missouri School of Journalism. He operated the paper until World War Two. Saults served as an officer in the 339th Infantry Regiment in North Africa and Italy during the war, after which he spent a year in Texas. In 1947, Saults joined the Missouri Department of Conservation, heading the depart- ment’s information service and editing the Missouri Conservationist. Later he became the deputy director of the department. In 1964, Saults joined the U. S. Department of the Interior and moved to Washington, D.C., where he worked with the Bureau of Land Management and the Fish and Wildlife Service. He retired in 1973. Saults and his wife, Helen, a former National Park Service employee, moved to a home near Branson, Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Marais Des Cygnes National Wildlife Refuge Proposed Addition Environmental Assessment and Concept Management Plan Contents
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Marais des Cygnes National Wildlife Refuge Proposed Addition Environmental Assessment and Concept Management Plan Contents Chapter 1.0 – Purpose And Need For Action............................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Need for Action .................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Background ......................................................................................................... 4 1.4.1 Wetlands ................................................................................................... 5 1.4.2 Floodplain Hardwood Forest ................................................................ 6 1.4.3 Tallgrass Prairie ...................................................................................... 6 1.4.4 Prairie River ............................................................................................ 6 1.4.5 Trust Species ........................................................................................... 7 1.4.5.1 Migratory Birds ............................................................................. 7 1.4.5.2 Migratory Fish .............................................................................. 7 1.4.5.3 Federally Listed Threatened/Endangered
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNMENTAL UNIT REFERENCE MAP (2015): St. Clair
    38.272355N 38.277383N 94.105289W GOVERNMENTAL UNIT REFERENCE MAP (2015): St. Clair County, MO 93.464474W Clinton township 13 LEGEND Leesville township Bethlehem SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL LABEL STYLE Harry S Truman Reservoir township Montrose Federal American Indian Deepwater Reservation L'ANSE RESERVATION (TA 1880) 7 52 Off-Reservation Trust Land T1880 Deepwater Brownington Deepwater township American Indian Tribal township SHONTO (620) Fairview township Subdivision Alaska Native Regional Corporation (ANRC) NANA ANRC 52120 HENRY 083 BATES 013 52 BENTON 015 HENRY 083 13 State (or statistically Bear Creek Tom equivalent entity) NEW YORK 36 township township Osage township County (or statistically equivalent entity) ERIE 029 1 2 3 4 5 Minor Civil Division (MCD)1 Lee town 41460 Harry S Truman Census County Division Reservoir 2 Jemez CCD 91650 HENRY 083 Harry S Truman Reservoir (CCD) ST. CLAIR 185 Consolidated City MILFORD 47500 13 Incorporated Place 3 52 Appleton 52 Davis 18100 City 01522 Census Designated Place (CDP) 2 Cochiti 16560 13 DESCRIPTION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL Interstate 3 Water Body Pleasant Lake U.S. Highway 2 Hudson township Swamp or Marsh Okefenokee Swamp State Highway 4 Appleton township 01504 Marsh Ln Glacier Bering Glacier Monegaw township 49142 Other Road Cul-de-sac Airport Oxnard Airport Jackson Circle township 36080 College or University Coll/Univ Geographic Offset or Corridor4 Chalk Level A1 Military Fort Belvoir township 13024 4WD Trail, Stairway, Alexander Alley, Walkway, or Ferry Prison or Juvenile P/JDC township Southern RR Detention Center Railroad Butler township 10108 Pipeline or Cemetery Powell Cmtry Power Line 3 1 6 7 8 9 10 Harry S Truman Reservoir 0 Ridge or Fence Golf Course Pinehurst GlfCrs S E T A Property Line or B National Park or Forest Yosemite NP ST.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Landscape of a Rural Region: the Effect of the Harry S
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Theses and Dissertations in Geography Geography Program (SNR) Winter 12-10-2009 The Changing Landscape of a Rural Region: The effect of the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir in the Osage River Basin of Missouri Melvin Arthur Johnson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geographythesis Part of the Human Geography Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Johnson, Melvin Arthur, "The Changing Landscape of a Rural Region: The effect of the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir in the Osage River Basin of Missouri" (2009). Theses and Dissertations in Geography. 5. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geographythesis/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geography Program (SNR) at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations in Geography by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF A RURAL REGION: THE EFFECT OF THE HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR IN THE OSAGE RIVER BASIN OF MISSOURI By Melvin Arthur Johnson A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Geography Under the Supervision of Professor David J. Wishart Lincoln, Nebraska December 2009 THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF A RURAL REGION: THE EFFECT OF THE HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR IN THE OSAGE RIVER BASIN OF MISSOURI Melvin Arthur Johnson, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2009 Advisor: David J.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri State Archives Finding Aid [998.380]
    Missouri State Archives Finding Aid [998.380] MANUSCRIPT COLLECTIONS Lynn Morrow Collection Abstract: Maps, photographs, and postcards related to Missouri history with a concentration in Central Missouri and the Ozarks. Includes photographs and documents related to U.S. Congressman Dewey Short and images of the Flood of 1993 in Jefferson City. Extent: Approximately 1 2/3 cubic feet of printed materials and 53 digital items Physical Description: Paper; Maps; Digital Scans; Photographs Location: Missouri State Archives; Stacks ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Alternative Formats: None Access Restrictions: None Publication Restrictions: Standard copyright rules apply Preferred Citation: [description of item], [date]; Lynn Morrow Collection, Record Group 998.380; Missouri State Archives, Jefferson City. Acquisition Information: Gifts, one deed. Accessions #1997-0063; #2009-0090; #2011-0072; #2011-0105; #2011-0123; #2017-0183; #2018-0141; #2018-0149; #2021-0005; #2021-0030 Processing Information: Processing completed by EW on 06/29/2018. Updated by EW on 10/04/2019, 02/23/2021 and 03/25/2021. HISTORICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES Lynn Morrow is a Missouri historian interested primarily in Jefferson City, Lake of the Ozarks, and general Ozark Region history. He served for many years at the Director of Local Records in the Records Services Division of the Missouri Secretary of State’s Office. as of 03/25/2021 LYNN MORROW COLLECTION, MS380 ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION Related Collections MS181 Dewey Short Papers MS263 Mid-Continent Iron Company Photograph Collection MS265 Katy Duckett Photograph Collection MS330 Charles Elliott Gill Photograph Collection MS465 US Forest Service Photographs MS468 Ozark National Scenic Riverways Photograph Collection MS502 Nancy Ginn Martin Collection RG005 Secretary of State’s Office Publications Division Portrait Collection RG110 Department of Natural Resources RG771 Little River Drainage District Maps at the Archives: G:\archives_apps\FindingAids\Maps\OVERSIZE Collection Index.xlsx.
    [Show full text]
  • Feral Hogs- Status and Distribution in Missouri
    FERAL HOGS- STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION IN MISSOURI A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By R. EDWIN HARTIN Dr. Mark Ryan, Thesis Advisor MAY 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to take this opportunity to acknowledge the support and mentorship of my committee members during my academic research. Dr. Mark Ryan served as my advisor, mentor, and basic support during this academic endeavor and to him; I express sincere thanks and gratitude. Dr. Russ Reidinger also provided the periodic support and encouragement that was needed to complete the project while I was working a full-time job. He is a true friend and mentor and has been a true inspiration to me in furthering my education. Dr. Charles Nilon and Dr. William Kurtz have also provided instruction and support as well as serving on my graduate committee. I appreciate both of them for their professionalism and encouragement during this process. I want to thank my supervisors, Charles Brown and Robert Hudson in USDA-APHIS- Wildlife Services for their support and understanding through this endeavor and for allowing me the time to increase my education and professionalism. My co-workers have been very helpful and supportive in this educational process. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………….…..ii ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………..iii CHAPTER 1……..…………………………………………………….…1 1998 FERAL HOG DISTRIBUTION…………………………………..15 2000 FERAL HOG DISTRIBUTION…………………………………..16 2002 FERAL HOG DISTRIBUTION…………………………………..17 2004 FERAL HOG DISTRIBUTION…………………………………..18 MISSOURI FERAL HOG TASK FORCE……………………………...19 FERAL HOG CONTROL METHODS…………………………............28 CHAPTER 2…………………………………………………………….44 LITERATURE CITED………………………………………….............58 APPENDIX A-TRAP PLANS…………………………………………..64 iii Chapter 1 Feral Hogs-Status and Distribution in Missouri Introduction Approximately 50,000 nonindigenous species have been introduced to the United States (Pimentel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • AWOS) for Initiated By: AJW-144 Change: 1 NON-FEDERAL APPLICATIONS
    Advisory Circular U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: AUTOMATED WEATHER Date: 01/31/2019 AC No: 150/5220-16E OBSERVING SYSTEMS (AWOS) FOR Initiated by: AJW-144 Change: 1 NON-FEDERAL APPLICATIONS 1. PURPOSE. This change contains updates that provide additional clarification and flexibility regarding technician training and responsibilities. These changes expand on the use of on site training or on the job training (OJT), based on statements regarding equivalent performance and maintenance standards in FAA Order 6700.20, Non-Federal Navigational Aids, Air Traffic Control Facilities, and Automated Weather Systems and discussion of on the job training in FAA Order 3000.57, Air Traffic Organization Technical Operations Training and Personnel Certification Programs. 2. PRINCIPAL CHANGES. Changed text is indicated by vertical bars in the margins. The primary revisions are contained in chapter 2, chapter 4 and the addition of appendix 2. Remove Page Date Insert Page Date i 03/10/2017 i 01/31/2019 ii 03/10/2017 ii 01/31/2019 v 03/10/2017 v 01/31/2019 vii 03/10/2017 vii 01/31/2019 8 03/10/2017 8 01/31/2019 12 03/10/2017 12 01/31/2019 18 03/10/2017 18 01/31/2019 64 03/10/2017 64 01/31/2019 A1-1 and A1-2 03/10/2017 A1-1 and A1-2 01/31/2019 A2-1 and A2-2 01/31/2019 David E. Spencer Director Operations Support, AJW-1 01/31/2019 AC 150/5220-16E CHG 1 Advisory Circular U.S.
    [Show full text]