Master Thesis Human Geography · Michiel Dekker · University of Amsterdam Uva ID: 6146414 · Michiel [email protected] · Supervisor: Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Master Thesis Human Geography · Michiel Dekker · University of Amsterdam Uva ID: 6146414 · Michiel D@Live.Nl · Supervisor: Dr ~ 1 ~ Master Thesis Human Geography · Michiel Dekker · University of Amsterdam UvA ID: 6146414 · [email protected] · Supervisor: Dr. Virginie Mamadouh · June 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….……………………5 CHAPTER ONE 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Ukraine’s path to its territorial breakup .................................................................... 7 1.3 Research questions ................................................................................................ 11 1.4 Societal and academic relevance ............................................................................ 11 1.5 Structure of the thesis ............................................................................................ 11 CHAPTER TWO 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Geopolitics ............................................................................................................. 12 2.3 Borders and territoriality ........................................................................................ 12 2.4 Geopolitical imaginations ...................................................................................... 14 2.5 Nation building ...................................................................................................... 15 2.6 Core concepts ........................................................................................................ 15 CHAPTER THREE 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Conceptual model .................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Operationalization of concepts .............................................................................. 17 3.3.1 Operationalization of factors contributing to geographical divisions ................ 17 3.3.2 Operationalization of attitudes towards the European Union and Russia ......... 17 3.3.2 Operationalization of individual, household and contextual characteristics ..... 18 3.4 Data ....................................................................................................................... 19 3.5 Dataset variables .................................................................................................... 22 3.5.1 Dependent variables ........................................................................................ 22 3.5.2 Independent variables ..................................................................................... 22 3.6 Descriptive analysis ................................................................................................ 23 ~ 2 ~ 3.7 Logistic regression analyses ................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER FOUR 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 25 4.2 Historical legacy of the west .................................................................................. 25 4.3 Historical legacy of the east ................................................................................... 27 4.4 Nation building in post-Soviet Ukraine ................................................................... 29 4.5 The ‘myth’ of a divided Ukraine .............................................................................. 31 4.6 The importance of the region ................................................................................. 34 4.7 Russia and the ‘otherness’ of Ukrainians ................................................................. 37 4.7 Divisions in Ukraine and external forces ................................................................. 40 4.8 Conclusion and hypotheses .................................................................................... 45 CHAPTER FIVE 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 46 5.2 The direction in which Ukraine should develop ....................................................... 47 5.3 Ukrainian attitudes towards the West .................................................................... 50 5.4 Ukrainian attitudes towards the East ..................................................................... 52 5.4 Other characteristics of the Ukrainian population .................................................. 55 5.4.1 Economical preferences .................................................................................. 57 5.4.2 Political preferences ........................................................................................ 59 5.5 Explanation of the used analyses and interpretation .............................................. 70 5.6 Explanation of the independent variables .............................................................. 71 5.7 Binary logistic regression analyses .......................................................................... 73 5.8 Multinomial logistic regression analysis ................................................................. 80 5.9 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 83 CHAPTER SIX 6.0 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 83 References……………………………………………………………………………………………………..86 Appendices…………………………………………………………………………………………………….92 ~ 3 ~ PREFACE This master thesis is the final product of my master’s programme in Human Geography of the University of Amsterdam, in which I hope to demonstrate the acquired research skills during the years of my study. The demonstrations in Ukraine in November last year immediately caught my attention, and before I knew it, I converted the events into the subject of my thesis. Writing a thesis while trying to stay up-to-date with the developments in the country has proven to be a challenge. Also, a change in methodology asked even more time than available which resulted in working seven days a week on the thesis. But these are sacrifices that I would make again, for the sake of writing about a topic that genuinely interests me, and a good part of society, according to the attention it gets in the media. My special thanks go to Virginie Mamadouh, for providing me with huge amounts of feedback, pushing me in the right direction when needed and a shared interest in the subject. I also have to thank Sjoerd de Vos, for helping me out with the statistical analyses. ~ 4 ~ ABSTRACT After the Second World War, the Eastern European region of the Ukraine was under direct influence by the Soviet Union, the cause of a period of deterritorialisation in the area. When the Cold War ended, the European area started to experience a phase of reterritorialisation, meaning that the disintegration of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics led to the birth of new states, including Ukraine. Ukraine, a country squeezed in between Western Europe and Russia is a divided country, in terms of support for either closer ties with the west or east, and tensions are visible. This was demonstrated by violent events in Ukraine in the beginning of 2014, marking the end of the in office period of the pro-Russian president Yanukovych. This study was done to get a better understanding of the 2014 crisis in Ukraine. In this research, two research questions are formulated: “Which factors have contributed to the shaping of a divided Ukrainian nation?” and “To what extent are different attitudes of Ukrainian citizens towards the European Union and Russia explained by individual, household and contextual characteristics?”. It is argued that the historical legacy has a major role in shaping divisions in Ukraine, and that nation-building policies have not brought the result the Ukrainian authorities were looking for. Different attitudes towards the EU and Russia are to be explained for a good part by reported voting behavior and the residential location, along with other independent variables. In the conclusion, it is argued that there is no single geopolitical vision in Ukraine. Furthermore, that a slow reorientation of the public opinion towards Europe since the independence in 1991, along with an event in which the government had to choose a geopolitical direction could be a primary reason for the crisis. It remains a central challenge for the Ukrainian government to accommodate desires to ‘Europeanize’ along with desires to maintain strong ties with Russia. ~ 5 ~ INTRODUCTION TO THE GEOGRAPHICAL DIVISIONS IN UKRAINE CHAPTER ONE 1.1 INTRODUCTION On the 21st of November in 2013, the Eastern European country Ukraine suspended preparations for a trade agreement with the European Union. The government said that it was instead looking into setting up a joint commission to promote connections between Ukraine, Russia and the European Union. This marked the start of large-scale demonstrations in the capital Kyiv and other cities. Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians expressed their discontent with the decision to delay the association deal with the EU. The protests turned violent in the beginning of 2014, and after deadly clashes in February, the Russian-oriented president Viktor Yanukovych
Recommended publications
  • Globalisation, Democratisation and Nation-Building As Competing
    Nation-Building, Democratization and Globalization as Competing Priorities in Ukraine’s Education System Summary: This article examines how consecutive governments in Ukraine have reconciled the different demands that nation-building, democratization and globalization pose on the national education system. It argues that nation-building conflicts with democratization and with globalization and engages in a review of Ukraine‘s educational policies from Perestroika to the present to illustrate this argument. It shows that nation building in post-Soviet Ukraine was primarily a language project aimed at the ukrainianization of schools and institutes of higher education. It further observes that nation-building was given priority over democratization and globalization in shaping the education system in the first decade following independence. From 2000, however, globalization has become an increasingly important discourse in education removing nation-building from the top of the political agenda. 1. Introduction One of the greatest challenges currently facing the new states in Central and Eastern Europe is educational reform. After obtaining independence in the early 1990s, these states were confronted with the immense task of transforming an outdated centralized education system, which was aimed at delivering a loyal communist workforce, into a modern system that would be much more responsive to consumer demands and would recognize and further individual talent. The immensity of the undertaking lies in the fact that three prerequisites make simultaneous demands on the education system: nation-building, democratization and globalization. The need for nation-building is felt particularly strong in those new states which derive their legitimacy from former minority nations. The political elites of these states consider nation-building a vital tool for the resuscitation of languages and cultures that have 1 played a subordinate role under the past communist regime.
    [Show full text]
  • “Crush Zone”: Geopolitical Games in Post-Cold War Eastern Europe
    Ordering the “Crush Zone”: Geopolitical Games in Post-Cold War Eastern Europe John O’Loughlin1 Institute of Behavioral Science University of Colorado Campus Box 487 Boulder, CO. 80309-0487 Email: [email protected] Word count: 8357 Biography John O’Loughlin is Director of the “Globalization and Democracy” graduate training program, funded by the National Science Foundation, in the Institute of Behavioral Science at the University of Colorado, Boulder. His research interests are in the diffusion of democracy, the relationship between economic and political transitions in Russia and Ukraine, and the changing identities of the peoples of the post-Soviet states. He is editor of Political Geography. 1 Abstract In the aftermath of the Cold War, no consensus has emerged in American political circles on a replacement for the containment geopolitical code of the 1945-1990 era. Various geopolitical paradigms are on offer, each emanating from a world-view that is heavily coloured by domestic political ideologies. Seven of these paradigms are described and considered in light of the momentous geopolitical decision in 1998 to expand NATO into Eastern Europe. Eastern Europe has been considered a “crush zone” by political geographers for over a century and the region has been intimately connected with the geopolitical re-orderings of this century. Strenuous avoidance of geopolitical issues, including long-term relations with Russia, was notable during the NATO expansion debates. The stark contrast of “chaos” (Russia and its neighbours in the former Soviet Union) to “ cosmos” (the European Union and three new central members of NATO) dominated the NATO enlargement debate. The end-consequence of recent NATO and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1682-1394.Pdf
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES INTERDISCIPLINARY POLITICAL AND CULTURAL JOURNAL, Vol. 18, No. 2/2016 10.1515/ ipcj-2016-0008 Jacek Reginia-Zacharski UKRAINIAN ISSUES IN GEOPOLITICAL THOUGHT OF THE TWENTIETH AND TWENTY-FIRST CENTURIES ABSTRACT: Ukrainian lands in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have been in proximity of great geopolitical changes several times. During that time the Ukrainian nation – due to various factors – encountered a number of “windows of opportunity” for achieving the realization of dreams about independence and national sovereignty. The author identified in the period considered four “general moments,” of which two have been completed successfully. The first of these oc- curred in 1990–1991, when for the first time in modern history, Ukrainians man- aged to achieve a lasting and relatively stable independence. The second of the “moments” – still unresolved – are events that began in the late autumn of 2013. The process, called “Revolution of Dignity”, represents a new quality in the history of the Ukrainian nation, therefore, that the Ukrainians have to defend the status quo (independence, territorial integrity, sovereignty, etc.) but not to seek to achieve an independent being. The analysis leads to the conclusion that the ability of Ukrainians to achieve and maintain independence is largely a function of the rela- tive power of the Russian state as measured with respect to the shape and quality of international relations. KEYWORDS: Ukraine, geopolitics, geostrategy, Russia, Maidan, war, security complex Ukraine’s geopolitical importance in the modern scientific re- flection and views, which can be described as “colloquial,” seems to be pretty obvious (Moczulski, 2010: 312). The country, located in the basin of the Dnieper River, with wide access to the Black Sea, an important human and economic potential, and above all, being a special keystone between “East” and “West,” has been pre- destined to play an important geopolitical role (Al-Rodhan, 2009: 18–19).
    [Show full text]
  • 17Th Plenary Session
    The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities 20 th SESSION CG(20)7 2 March 2011 Local elections in Ukraine (31 October 2010) Bureau of the Congress Rapporteur: Nigel MERMAGEN, United Kingdom (L, ILDG)1 A. Draft resolution....................................................................................................................................2 B. Draft recommendation.........................................................................................................................2 C. Explanatory memorandum..................................................................................................................4 Summary Following the official invitation from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine to observe the local elections on 31 October 2010, the Congress appointed an observer delegation, headed by Gudrun Mosler-Törnström (R, Austria, SOC), Member and Vice-President of the State Parliament of Salzburg. Councillor Nigel Mermagen (L, UK, ILDG) was appointed Rapporteur. The delegation was composed of fifteen members of the Congress and four members of the EU Committee of the Regions, assisted by four members of the Congress secretariat. The delegation concluded, after pre-election and actual election observation missions, that local elections in Ukraine were generally conducted in a calm and orderly manner. It also noted with satisfaction that for the first time, local elections were held separately from parliamentary ones, as requested in the past by the Congress. No indications of systematic fraud were brought
    [Show full text]
  • Regionalism Without Regions: Reconceptualizing Ukraine's
    H-Ukraine New book TOC: "Regionalism without Regions: Reconceptualizing Ukraine’s Heterogeneity" Discussion published by Oleksii Chebotarov on Wednesday, November 20, 2019 The collective volume published by the Central European University was an outcome of an international interdisciplinary research project "Region, Nation, and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary and Transcultural Reconceptualization of Ukraine". The project brought together historians, sociologists, anthropologists, economists, literary scholars, and linguists from Ukraine, the USA, and Europe. In their studies, they used both quantitative (statistical surveys), and qualitative methods (in-depth interviews and focus-group discussions). Considering Ukraine as a construct in the flow where different discourses intersect, overlap, and sometimes, consolidate through the lens of different disciplines and methodologies, the project reconceptualizes regional heterogeneity of Ukraine and the functioning of established regions. More information about the research project could be found on the “Ukrainian Regionalism”: a research platform. Regionalism without Regions: Reconceptualizing Ukraine’s Heterogeneity, Ed. Oksana Myshlovska Ulrich Schmid. Central European University Press, 2019. 468 pp. ISBN: 978-963-7326-63-9 URL: http://ceupress.com/book/regionalism-without-regions Table of contents 1. Introduction Oksana Myshlovska, Ulrich Schmid and Tatjana Hofmann 2. The Regional Differentiation of Identities in Ukraine: How Many Regions? Maria Lewicka and Bartłomiej Iwańczak 3. The Ukrainian Past and Present: Legacies, Memory and Attitudes André Liebich, Oksana Myshlovska, Viktoriia Sereda, with Oleksandra Gaidai and Iryna Sklokina 4. Language(s) in the Ukrainian Regions: Historical Roots and the Current Situation Juliane Besters-Dilger, Kateryna Karunyk and Serhii Vakulenko 5. Literary Mediascapes in Ukraine Tatjana Hofmann, Anna Chebotarova, Alexander Kratochvil and Ulrich Schmid 6.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Manitoba Department of History HIST 2600 W Introduction To
    University of Manitoba Department of History HIST 2600 W Introduction to Ukraine Fall 2010 Instructor: Olexandr Shevchenko Phone: 284-4309 (home) E-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: 2-6 p. m., Mondays, 211 St. Andrew's College Class Location: Classroom D, St. Andrew's College The purpose of this course is to introduce students to the history of Ukraine, the formation of national identity, and the dynamics of nation building in the specific historical periods of the 9th to the 19th centuries. The focus will be on the medieval Rus, Ukraine under Poland, the Cossack period, and the Hetmanate and Ukrainian experience in the Russian and Austrian Empires. The course will look at the complex linguistic, religious and regional factors that have contributed to making Ukraine what it is today. This is a lecture course with added audiovisual aids used whenever feasible. Textbook Required: O. Subtelny, Ukraine: A History, third edition. A reading list will be provided. Term Requirements: 3 short quizzes (each worth 5 % of the final grade). The primary focus of the quizzes is to test knowledge of the most important dates and names of Ukrainian history One essay, 1500 words, 15 % due on October 18, 2010 One essay, 2500 words, 40% due on December 6, 2010 Final exam: 30%, during the examination period. Total: 100% Since this is a course that meets the University Senate's W requirement, students must complete all essay assignments with a passing grade to pass the course. Grade Distribution: A+ 90-100 C+ 60-65 A 80-89 C 55-59 B+ 72-79 D 50-54 B 66-71 F 49 or less Late assignments are penalized by 2% per day unless a medical certificate is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate of the British Isles
    Міністерство освіти і науки України Мелітопольський державний педагогічний університет імені Богдана Хмельницького Кафедра англійської мови Т.М. Камишова, Т.А. Устінова, О.Ф. Христова МОВЛЕННЄВИЙ ПРАКТИКУМ ДЛЯ ПРОВЕДЕННЯ САМОСТІЙНОЇ РОБОТИ З ПРАКТИКИ УСНОГО ТА ПИСЕМНОГО МОВЛЕННЯ для студентів I курсу денної форми навчання спеціальність: географія Мелітополь 2015 УДК 811.111 ББК 81.432.1 М 15 Затверджено Вченою радою Мелітопольського державного педагогічного університету імені Богдана Хмельницького Протокол № __ від «__». _______________ 20__ р. Рецензенти: _____________________, кандидат філологічних наук, доцент кафедри __________________________________________________________ ___ __________________________________________________________ ___ _____________________, кандидат філологічних наук, доцент кафедри __________________________________________________________ ___ __________________________________________________________ ___ Рекомендовано до друку Вченою радою Мелітопольського державного педагогічного університету імені Богдана Хмельницького (протокол № __ від «__». _______________ 20__ р.) Камишова Т.М., Устінова Т.А., Христова О.Ф. М 15 Мовленнєвий практикум для проведення самостійної роботи з практики усного та писемного мовлення для студентів I курсу природничо-географічного факультету спеціальності географія. – Мелітополь: Мелітопольський державний педагогічний університет імені Богдана Хмельницького, 2015. - _______ с. У практикумі пропонуються завдання для самостійного опрацювання студентами I курсу спеціальності географія.
    [Show full text]
  • History on the Crossroads of Nation-Building
    Paper from the Conference “Current Issues in European Cultural Studies”, organised by the Advanced Cultural Studies Institute of Sweden (ACSIS) in Norrköping 15-17 June 2011. Conference Proceedings published by Linköping University Electronic Press: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_home/index.en.aspx?issue=062. © The Author. Memory of the Past and Memory for the Future: History on the Crossroads of Nation-building Yuliya Yurchuk Södertörn University College / Stockholm University [email protected] The paper focuses on the nationalisation of history and changes in memory politics of Ukraine after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The questions of history re-writing and re-evaluating is endemic to transitional societies. The very possibility to approach certain events is a direct consequence of freedom of speech that followed the disintegration of the socialist bloc. As a case study the paper scrutinizes new conceptualisations and interpretations of history of the WWII with a special focus on Ukrainian nationalist movements that acted in Western Ukraine in 1929-1956: the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and Ukrainian Insurgent Army. There have been constant attempts to place the heroic narrative about these movements into the core of a national history, yet this narrative failed to cross the invisible walls within Ukraine and the narrative purposed for the whole nation remains regional in its significance. The paper is to fill the gap in an existing debate and to show how complex the memory work is in the modern world. A lot of interferences on international, regional, and local levels make the representational take-over of a state-sanctioned view on history more difficult and complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Сartography in Ukraine the National Report of Ukraine (2015 – 2019
    Сartography in Ukraine The national report of Ukraine (2015 – 2019) 18th General Assembly of International Cartographic Association Tokio, Japan, 15th of July 2019 2 1. 1. Activities at the International Cartographic Association Ukraine is an active member of the International Cartographic Association from 1993. Ukrainian cartographic works were the winners of the International Cartographic Exhibitions award: the wall training map "Physical and administrative maps of France" State Scientific and Research Enterprise "Cartography" (2nd place in the category of "Educational cartography", 2011); "Physical-geographical map of Ukraine" State Scientific and Research Enterprise "Cartography" (2nd place in the category of "Electronic editions", 2013). Children's drawings from Ukraine won three times prizes at the Barbara Petchenik Children's World Map Drawing Competition in 1997, in 2007 and in 2013. Stoliarov Nazar, 6 years old Moskalenko Svitlana, 14 years old 3 – Feklyna Svitlana, 10 years old Young Ukrainian scientists have received three grants from the International Cartographic Association for participating in the international cartographic conferences: 2007 - N. Polyakova (Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University), 2009 - V. Molochko (State Scientific and Research Enterprise "Cartography"), 2013 - V. Putrenko (Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine). 2. Organization of cartographic activity. Cartographic activity in Ukraine is regulated by the Laws of Ukraine “On Topographic, Geodetic and Cartographic Activity” and “On Geographical Names”. The Law of Ukraine “On Topographic, Geodetic and Cartographic Activity” (1998) sets the legal framework for the regulation of relations in the sphere of topographic, geodetic and cartographic activity for the needs of the state and citizens by the results of topographic, geodetic and cartographic activities.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESERVING the DNIPRO RIVER Harmony, History and Rehabilitation PRESERVING the DNIPRO RIVER
    PRESERVING THE DNIPRO RIVER harmony, history and rehabilitation PRESERVING THE DNIPRO RIVER harmony, history and rehabilitation International Dnipro Fund, Kiev, Ukraine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada, National Research Institute of Environment and Resources of Ukraine PRESERVING THE DNIPRO RIVER harmony, history and rehabilitation Vasyl Yakovych Shevchuk Georgiy Oleksiyovich Bilyavsky Vasyl M ykolayovych Navrotsky Oleksandr Oleksandrovych Mazurkevich Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Preserving the Dnipro River / V.Y. Schevchuk ... [et al.]. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-88962-827-0 1. Water quality management--Dnieper River. 2. Dnieper River--Environmental conditions. I. Schevchuk, V. Y. QH77.U38P73 2004 333.91'62153'09477 C2004-906230-1 No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review. Publishing by Mosaic Press, offices and warehouse at 1252 Speers Rd., units 1 & 2, Oakville, On L6L 5N9, Canada and Mosaic Press, PMB 145, 4500 Witmer Industrial Estates, Niagara Falls, NY, 14305-1386, U.S.A. and International Development Research Centre PO Box 8500 Ottawa, ON K1G 3H9/Centre de recherches pour le développement international BP 8500 Ottawa, ON K1G 3H9 (pub@ idrc.ca / www.idrc.ca)
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018
    Ukraine RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018 KNOWYOURCOUNTRY.COM Executive Summary - Ukraine Sanctions: EU & US Sanctions FAFT list of AML No Deficient Countries US Dept of State Money Laundering assessment Higher Risk Areas: Not on EU White list equivalent jurisdictions Corruption Index (Transparency International & W.G.I.)) World Governance Indicators (Average Score) Failed States Index (Political Issues)(Average Score) Medium Risk Areas: Compliance with FATF 40 + 9 Recommendations Major Investment Areas: Agriculture - products: grain, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, vegetables; beef, milk Industries: coal, electric power, ferrous and nonferrous metals, machinery and transport equipment, chemicals, food processing Exports - commodities: ferrous and nonferrous metals, fuel and petroleum products, chemicals, machinery and transport equipment, food products Exports - partners: Russia 23.7%, Turkey 6%, China 4.1% (2012) Imports - commodities: energy, machinery and equipment, chemicals Imports - partners: Russia 19.4%, China 10.2%, Germany 9.6%, Belarus 7.8%, Poland 7.1% (2012) 1 Investment Restrictions: Under Ukrainian law, certain types of business activity may be pursued by state-owned enterprises only. These include some natural monopolies, the rocket industry, the production of bio-ethanol, and the printing of banknotes and blank securities forms. In addition, Ukrainian law authorizes the government to set limits on foreign participation in "strategically important areas," although the wording is vague and the law is rarely used in practice. Generally, these restrictions limit the maximum permissible percentage of foreign investment into Ukrainian firms in these sectors. For example, the share of foreign investors' participation in Ukrainian publishing houses is limited to 30%. Investments into the energy sector can also be problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • Peripheral Borders, Soft and Hard Re-Bordering in Europe
    Belgeo Revue belge de géographie 2 | 2020 Peripheral borders, soft and hard re-bordering in Europe Editorial: Peripheral borders, soft and hard re- bordering in Europe Joan Vicente Rufí, Yann Richard, Jaume Feliu and Matteo Berzi Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/37391 DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.37391 ISSN: 2294-9135 Publisher: National Committee of Geography of Belgium, Société Royale Belge de Géographie Electronic reference Joan Vicente Rufí, Yann Richard, Jaume Feliu and Matteo Berzi, « Editorial: Peripheral borders, soft and hard re-bordering in Europe », Belgeo [Online], 2 | 2020, Online since 23 April 2020, connection on 17 December 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/37391 ; DOI : https://doi.org/ 10.4000/belgeo.37391 This text was automatically generated on 17 December 2020. Belgeo est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Editorial: Peripheral borders, soft and hard re-bordering in Europe 1 Editorial: Peripheral borders, soft and hard re-bordering in Europe Joan Vicente Rufí, Yann Richard, Jaume Feliu and Matteo Berzi 1 Observing boundaries as an empirical manifestation of the spatial and temporal limits of societies (Jacob, Von Asche, 2014) is an exciting research perspective in social science. From the second half of the 19th Century to the beginning of the 20th Century, geographers have been working continuously on borders, in relation to various themes: political division of space, territoriality and exercise of power. All this research has been one of the most obvious manifestations of the link between this discipline and the construction of the modern state.
    [Show full text]