Eobrolgus Spinosus Class: Multicrustacea, Malacostraca, Eumalacostraca

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eobrolgus Spinosus Class: Multicrustacea, Malacostraca, Eumalacostraca Phylum: Arthropoda, Crustacea Eobrolgus spinosus Class: Multicrustacea, Malacostraca, Eumalacostraca Order: Peracarida, Amphipoda, Amphilochidea, A gammarid amphipod Lysianassida, Haustoriidira Family: Haustorioidea, Phoxocephalidae, Brolginae Taxonomy: The genera Eobrolgus and as long as pereonites one through three Foxiphalus were designated in 1979 by Bar- (Barnard 1975) (Fig. 1). nard and included species formerly in the Rostrum: Rostrum well developed and genus Paraphoxus, including E. spinosus not constricted (Eobrolgus, Barnard 1979) (e.g. Paraphoxus spinosus) (Barnard and (Fig. 1). Barnard 1982). Eyes: Large, black and about same size in females (Figs. 1, 2) and immature Description males, but is much larger in mature males Size: Individuals to 4.5 mm in length (Puget (not figured). Sound, Barnard 1960). The largest Oregon Antenna 1: Female first antenna equal specimens were 3.5 mm (Coos Bay) and 2.4 in length to second antenna. Flagellum has mm (Yaquina Bay) (Kemp et al. 1985). Ovi- about seven articles (Fig. 3a) and accessory gerous females are not longer than 5 mm flagellum (in both sexes) is with about five ar- (Barnard 1975). ticles. Color: White, with black eyes. Antenna 2: The peduncle of the General Morphology: The body of amphi- second antenna in females is with some pod crustaceans can be divided into three heavy spines and setae (Fig. 3b). The major regions. The cephalon (head) or flagellum has about seven slender articles, cephalothorax includes antennules, anten- and is shorter than the peduncle (Barnard nae, mandibles, maxillae and maxillipeds 1960). The male flagellum is longer than the (collectively the mouthparts). Posterior to body in mature males and can have sensory the cephalon is the pereon (thorax) with clubs on proximal flagellal articles and on fifth seven pairs of pereopods attached to pere- peduncle articles (not figured). Immature onites followed by the pleon (abdomen) with males have flagella a little longer than six pairs of pleopods. The first three sets of peduncle. pleopods are generally used for swimming, Mouthparts: Epistome (a part of the while the last three are simpler and surround lip) is not produced into cusp (Fig. 1a) the telson at the animal posterior. Members (Barnard 1960). The Phoxocephalidae is one of the gammarid family Phoxocephalidae are of few groups in which epistome is of taxo- referred to as “spiny heads” due to their nomic importance. For a lateral view, push shield-like pointed rostrums. They are also antennae and mandibular palps aside one the most abundant and diverse group of (Barnard 1960). Mandible with tri-articled crustaceans in this size range (1–10 mm, palp, feeble molar and no large process. Right Chapman 2007). Unlike many amphipod female mandible is with simple lacinia mobilis groups, taxonomic keys tend to favor female (Barnard and Barnard 1981) (Fig. 4). The first specimens in the Phoxocephalidae maxilla is with biarticulate palp and an outer (Chapman 2007). plate with nine spines (Barnard and Barnard Cephalon: Head tapers evenly and is not 1981). Maxilliped palp of article four is with- abruptly narrowed (Fig. 2) with length about A publication of the University of Oregon Libraries and the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Individual species: https://oimb.uoregon.edu/oregon-estuarine-invertebrates and full 3rd edition: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/18839 Email corrections to: [email protected] Hiebert, T.C. 2015. Eobrolgus spinosus. In: Oregon Estuarine Invertebrates: Rudys' Illustrated Guide to Common Species, 3rd ed. T.C. Hiebert, B.A. Butler and A.L. Shanks (eds.). University of Oregon Libraries and Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston, OR. out large distal setae (not figured). inner ramus is more than half as long as the Pereon: outer and is quite setose in mature specimens Coxae: Coxal plate one almost as (Fig. 9c) (Barnard 1960). large as two. The fourth coxa is broad and Epimera: The third epimeron is not the fifth rounded (Fig. 1). Coxal margins produced into a tooth and is naked (i.e. bears bear simple setae. no setae) (Barnard and Barnard 1981) (Fig. Gnathopod 1: Small. Similar in size 1). and shape to the second gnathopods Telson: Teslon, with cleft, is thin, lamellar and (Eobrolgus, Barnard 1979). Article six is each lobe is with one short spine and one fine broad. seta (Fig. 8). Gnathopod 2: Much like first gnatho- Sexual Dimorphism: Not as strong as in pods. The first article is not pronounced (i.e. some amphipod families. Males have larger with even margins) and the sixth article is eyes, much longer second antennae and spi- broad. nose uropods (uropod three). Usual amphi- Pereopods 3 through 7: Pereopods pod gnathopod sexual dimorphism is not ob- with stout spines (Figs. 1, 6, 7). Pereopod served in this genus (Barnard 1960; Chapman four "normal" in orientation, not reversed like 2007). pereopods 5–7 (Barnard 1975) (see Possible Misidentifications Eohaustorius estuarius). Pereopod five with Phoxocephalids can be distinguished second article broad, articles 4–5 expanded primarily by their sixth and seventh pereo- but narrower than article two (Fig. 1). pods, which are greatly different from each Pereopod six is longer and more slender other. They also have distinctive multiarticu- and with narrower article two than pereopod late accessory flagellae (on antenna one), seven (Fig. 6). Pereopod seven is shorter, and long rostrums (Barnard 1960). Hyalidae stouter and with article two broader than and Dogielinotidae are also estuarine families, pereopod six and has rounded posterior but they lack mandibular palps and inner rami edge with fine spines, no large spur (Fig. 7). on the third uropods. The Pleustidae have Pleon: uncleft telsons and only vestigial antennal ac- Pleonites: Fourth pleonite with proxi- cessory flagella (Barnard 1975). Both the mal edge strongly depressed in males, while Gammaridae and Haustoriidae have pereo- the edge is almost flush with segment three pods that are similar in size and shape (not in females (Eobrolgus, Barnard 1960). like the Phoxocephalidae) and in these fami- Urosomites: First urosomite pedun- lies, pereopod four is reversed. Gammaridae cle with at least one dorsal margin, with only have a telson with connected lobes (see one or no spines and two spines on inner Eogammarus confervicolus), while the telson peduncle margin. Inner and outer branches lobes of Haustoriidae are disjunct (see similar, with one apical and one margin Eohaustorius estuarius), and are much spine (Fig. 9a). Second uropods in females heavier than those of Eobrolgus. with four stout spines on peduncle margin, The Phoxocephalidae is a diverse and rami shorter than peduncle and without mar- abundant group of amphipods with 13 genera ginal spines (Fig. 9b) (Barnard 1960). In (comprising 30–45 species) represented lo- males, there are more spines on peduncle cally including, Mandibulophoxus (one local (not figured). The third uropods in females species), Cephalophoxoides (one local spe- is with inner ramus half as long as (or sligh- cies), Heterophoxus, (five local species), Ma- tly less than) outer (Fig. 9d). In males, the joxiphalus (one local species), Metaphoxus A publication of the University of Oregon Libraries and the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Individual species: https://oimb.uoregon.edu/oregon-estuarine-invertebrates and full 3rd edition: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/18839 Email corrections to: [email protected] (one local species), and Parametaphoxus Adults are larger than those of E. spinosus (one local species). Most phoxocephalid and ovigerous females are over 6 mm in len- species formerly in Paraphoxus have been gth, but not under 5 mm. Foxiphalus major placed (by Barnard 1979) into one of six amphipods have longer heads and smaller genera including Metharpinia (two local spe- eyes than do E. spinosus and their fifth pereo- cies), Eyakia (one local species), Foxiphalus pod is slender, not stout. The inner ramus of (seven local species), Grandifoxus (three the female third uropod is more than ½ the local species), Rhepoxynius (19 local length of the outer ramus (not less than ½, species), and Eobrolgus (two local species). Fig. 9d). The third pleonal epimeron is conca- Mandibulophoxus is distinguished ve or straight on its posterior edge and seto- from Eobrolgus by its sickle-shaped mandi- se. Foxiphalus major was found under its old bular palp borne on a large process. It has name (Pontharpinia obtusidens) on Oregon's a biarticulate palp on the first maxilla (like outer coast (Barnard 1954, 1979). Eobrolgus). Mandibulophoxus gilesi is an Rhepoxynius tridentatus and others of eyeless, long-rostrumed species that has this genus have an abruptly narrowing, unta- been found subtidally (to 14 meters depth) in pered rostrum and the second article of pere- Yaquina Bay and other Oregon estuaries opod seven has three large teeth on the pos- (Chapman 2007). terior edge (Barnard 1954, 1979). Eobrolgus chumashi is an endemic Rhepoxynius abronius, with a broad head and oceanic species whose range probably narrow, short rostrum, has a long, sharp epis- extends only south of Oregon (Barnard and tomal process. This species has large teeth Barnard 1981). Its body is dwarfed and the on the posterior edge of pereopod seven. It head and eyes are large. The pleonal has been reported from Yaquina Bay, Ore- epimeron are not naked as in E. spinosus, gon. but have 1–2 ventral setae. The lacinia Grandifoxus grandis (= Grandifoxus mobilis (on the right mandible of the female) milleri and Paraphosux milleri) is found in the is bifid, not simple. Some hybridization Columbia River estuary. This closely related between these two species of Eobrolgus species has a narrow gnathopod hand (sixth may occur (Barnard and Barnard 1981; article) and an abruptly narrowing rostrum Chapman 2007). (Barnard 1960, 1979). The genera Foxiphalus and Eobrol- Ecological Information gus are morphologically similar. Female Range: Type locality is New England (Homes Eobrolgus have a short second article on 1905; Barnard and Barnard 1982). Known antenna one with a ventral surface that is range includes the western Atlantic, from continually covered with setae.
Recommended publications
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the Lower Chesapeake Estuaries
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1971 The distribution and ecology of the Gammaridea (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the lower Chesapeake estuaries James Feely Virginia Institute of Marine Science Marvin L. Wass Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Marine Biology Commons, Oceanography Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Feely, J., & Wass, M. L. (1971) The distribution and ecology of the Gammaridea (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the lower Chesapeake estuaries. Special papers in marine science No.2. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. http://doi.org/10.21220/V5H01D This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE GAMMARIDEA (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE ESTUARIES James B. Feeley and Marvin L. Wass SPECIAL PAPERS IN MARINE SCIENCE NO. 2 VIRGIN IA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SC IE NCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1971 THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE GAMMARIDEA (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) OF THE LOWER 1 CHESAPEAKE ESTUARIES James B. Feeley and Marvin L. Wass SPECIAL PAPERS IN MARINE SCIENCE NO. 2 1971 VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 This document is in part a thesis by James B. Feeley presented to the School of Marine Science of the College of William and Mary in Virginia in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptions of New Species of Birubius (Amphipoda: Phoxocephalidae) from Australia and Papua New Guinea with Comments on the Bi
    Memoirs of Museum Victoria 58(2): 255–295 (2001) DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES OF BIRUBIUS (AMPHIPODA: PHOXOCEPHALIDAE) FROM AUSTRALIA AND PAPUA NEW GUINEA WITH COMMENTS ON THE BIRUBIUS-KULGAPHOXUS-TICKALERUS-YAN COMPLEX JOANNE TAYLOR1,2 AND GARY C. B. POORE1 1Museum Victoria, GPO Box 666E, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia 2Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia ([email protected] and [email protected]) Abstract Taylor, J. and Poore, G.C.B., 2001. Descriptions of new species of Birubius (Amphipoda: Phoxocephalidae) from Australia and Papua New Guinea with comments on the Birubius-Kul- gaphoxus-Tickalerus-Yan complex. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 58(2): 255–295. Five new species of Birubius Barnard and Drummond, 1976 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Phox- ocephalidae) are reported: B. drummondae sp. nov and B. heislersi sp. nov from Victoria, Aus- tralia; B. wallisae sp. nov. from Queensland, Australia; and B. lowryi sp. nov., and B. wilsoni sp. nov. from Papua New Guinea. The present records extend the range of the genus previously reported from Australia and Indonesia. The genus Birubius is discussed and compared with the Australian genera Tickalerus Barnard and Drummond, 1978 (monotypic), Kulgaphoxus Barnard and Drummond, 1978 (two species) and Yan Barnard and Drummond, 1978 (two species) in light of the new species exhibiting a combination of characters from all genera. Their synonymy is foreshadowed. Introduction and Bousfield, 1994, Metharpinia Schellenberg, 1931, Microphoxus J.L. Barnard, 1960 and Rhep- Barnard and Drummond (1978) discussed the oxynius J.L. Barnard, 1979. The genus Linca was relationships between all Australian species of not included in the new subfamily and so remains the Phoxocephalidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Suborder Gammaridea Latreille, 1803
    Systematic List of Amphipods Found in British Columbia by Aaron Baldwin, PhD Candidate School of Fisheries and Ocean Science University of Alaska, Fairbanks Questions and comments can be directed to Aaron Baldwin at [email protected] This list is adapted from my unpublished list “Amphipoda of Alaska” that I had maintained from 1999 to about 2004. This list follows the taxonomy of Bousfield (2001b) and utilizes his ranges as confirmed records for British Columbia. It is important to note that I have not updated the original list for about five years, so name changes, range extensions, and new species since that time are unlikely to be included. Because of the relative difficulty in amphipod identification and the shortage of specialists there are undoubtedly many more species that have yet to be discovered and/or named. In cases where I believe that a family or genus will likely be discovered I included a bolded note. Traditional classification divides the amphipods into four suborders, of which three occur on our coast. This classification is utilized here (but see note on Hyperiida at end of list), but is likely artificial as the Hyperiidea and Caprelidea probably nest within the Gammaridea. Myers and Lowry (2003) used molecular work to support elevating the superfamily Corophioidea (Corophoidea) to subordinal status and including the traditional corophoids as well as the caprellids as infraorders within this taxon. These authors cite a reference I do not have (Barnard and Karaman, 1984) as the original source of this classification. As time allows I may include this new and probably better classification updates to this list Key: (?) Author unknown to me and apparently everyone else.
    [Show full text]
  • Chec List Marine and Coastal Biodiversity of Oaxaca, Mexico
    Check List 9(2): 329–390, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution ǡ PECIES * S ǤǦ ǡÀ ÀǦǡ Ǧ ǡ OF ×±×Ǧ±ǡ ÀǦǡ Ǧ ǡ ISTS María Torres-Huerta, Alberto Montoya-Márquez and Norma A. Barrientos-Luján L ǡ ǡǡǡǤͶ͹ǡ͹ͲͻͲʹǡǡ ǡ ȗ ǤǦǣ[email protected] ćĘęėĆĈęǣ ϐ Ǣ ǡǡ ϐǤǡ ǤǣͳȌ ǢʹȌ Ǥͳͻͺ ǯϐ ʹǡͳͷ͹ ǡͳͷ ȋǡȌǤǡϐ ǡ Ǥǡϐ Ǣ ǡʹͶʹȋͳͳǤʹΨȌ ǡ groups (annelids, crustaceans and mollusks) represent about 44.0% (949 species) of all species recorded, while the ͹͸ʹ ȋ͵ͷǤ͵ΨȌǤǡ not yet been recorded on the Oaxaca coast, including some platyhelminthes, rotifers, nematodes, oligochaetes, sipunculids, echiurans, tardigrades, pycnogonids, some crustaceans, brachiopods, chaetognaths, ascidians and cephalochordates. The ϐϐǢ Ǥ ēęėĔĉĚĈęĎĔē Madrigal and Andreu-Sánchez 2010; Jarquín-González The state of Oaxaca in southern Mexico (Figure 1) is and García-Madrigal 2010), mollusks (Rodríguez-Palacios known to harbor the highest continental faunistic and et al. 1988; Holguín-Quiñones and González-Pedraza ϐ ȋ Ǧ± et al. 1989; de León-Herrera 2000; Ramírez-González and ʹͲͲͶȌǤ Ǧ Barrientos-Luján 2007; Zamorano et al. 2008, 2010; Ríos- ǡ Jara et al. 2009; Reyes-Gómez et al. 2010), echinoderms (Benítez-Villalobos 2001; Zamorano et al. 2006; Benítez- ϐ Villalobos et alǤʹͲͲͺȌǡϐȋͳͻ͹ͻǢǦ Ǥ ǡ 1982; Tapia-García et alǤ ͳͻͻͷǢ ͳͻͻͺǢ Ǧ ϐ (cf. García-Mendoza et al. 2004). ǡ ǡ studies among taxonomic groups are not homogeneous: longer than others. Some of the main taxonomic groups ȋ ÀʹͲͲʹǢǦʹͲͲ͵ǢǦet al.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphipoda Key to Amphipoda Gammaridea
    GRBQ188-2777G-CH27[411-693].qxd 5/3/07 05:38 PM Page 545 Techbooks (PPG Quark) Dojiri, M., and J. Sieg, 1997. The Tanaidacea, pp. 181–278. In: J. A. Blake stranded medusae or salps. The Gammaridea (scuds, land- and P. H. Scott, Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa hoppers, and beachhoppers) (plate 254E) are the most abun- Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel. 11. The Crustacea. dant and familiar amphipods. They occur in pelagic and Part 2 The Isopoda, Cumacea and Tanaidacea. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California. benthic habitats of fresh, brackish, and marine waters, the Hatch, M. H. 1947. The Chelifera and Isopoda of Washington and supralittoral fringe of the seashore, and in a few damp terres- adjacent regions. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 10: 155–274. trial habitats and are difficult to overlook. The wormlike, 2- Holdich, D. M., and J. A. Jones. 1983. Tanaids: keys and notes for the mm-long interstitial Ingofiellidea (plate 254D) has not been identification of the species. New York: Cambridge University Press. reported from the eastern Pacific, but they may slip through Howard, A. D. 1952. Molluscan shells occupied by tanaids. Nautilus 65: 74–75. standard sieves and their interstitial habitats are poorly sam- Lang, K. 1950. The genus Pancolus Richardson and some remarks on pled. Paratanais euelpis Barnard (Tanaidacea). Arkiv. for Zool. 1: 357–360. Lang, K. 1956. Neotanaidae nov. fam., with some remarks on the phy- logeny of the Tanaidacea. Arkiv. for Zool. 9: 469–475. Key to Amphipoda Lang, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Author's Personal Copy
    Author's personal copy Journal of Sea Research 85 (2014) 508–517 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Sea Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/seares Dietary analysis of the marine Amphipoda (Crustacea: Peracarida) from the Iberian Peninsula J.M. Guerra-García a,b,⁎, J.M. Tierno de Figueroa b,c,C.Navarro-Barrancoa,b,M.Rosa,b, J.E. Sánchez-Moyano a,J.Moreirad a Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda Reina Mercedes 6, 41012 Sevilla, Spain b Jun Zoological Research Center, C/Los Jazmines 15, 18213 Jun, Granada, Spain c Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Campus Fuentenueva, 18071 Granada, Spain d Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, 28049 Madrid, Spain article info abstract Article history: The gut contents of 2982 specimens of 33 amphipod families, 71 genera and 149 species were examined, Received 30 March 2013 representing a high percentage of amphipod diversity in the Iberian Peninsula. Material was collected mainly Received in revised form 29 July 2013 from sediments, algae and hydroids along the whole coast of the Iberian Peninsula from 1989 to 2011. Although Accepted 10 August 2013 detritus was the dominant food item in the majority of amphipods, gammarideans also included carnivorous Available online 23 August 2013 (mainly feeding on crustaceans) and herbivorous species (feeding on macroalgal tissues). Our study revealed that general assignment of a type of diet for a whole family is not always adequate. Some families showed a con- Keywords: Feeding Habits sistent pattern in most of the studied species (Corophiidae, Pontoporeiidae =detritivorous; Oedicerotidae, Amphipods Phoxocephalidae, Stenothoidae = carnivorous; Ampithoidae = primarily herbivorous on macroalgae), but Caprellideans others included species with totally different feeding strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Amphipoda, Phoxocephalidae) from Southeast and Southern Brazil, with an Identifi Cation Key to World Species of the Genus
    European Journal of Taxonomy 592: 1–16 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.592 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Andrade L.F. & Senna A.R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:31DF91C1-8CF2-4E84-AD18-F4899822690D A novel species of Heterophoxus Shoemaker, 1925 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Phoxocephalidae) from southeast and southern Brazil, with an identifi cation key to world species of the genus Luiz F. ANDRADE 1,* & André R. SENNA 2 1 Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Decanato de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, UFRRJ, Rod. BR 465, Km 7, Seropédica, RJ, CEP 23890-000, Brazil. 2 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Formação de Professores, Departamento de Ciências, Rua Dr. Francisco Portela, 1470, Patronato, São Gonçalo, RJ, CEP 24435-005, Brazil. * Corresponding author: lzfl [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FC1B5DFE-8499-425A-8A42-760F71AF6315 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:01438506-4EE8-4F31-B202-F426005866C8 Abstract. This paper describes a novel species of the genus Heterophoxus Shoemaker, 1925 from Brazil. The material examined was collected during the Mini Biological Trawl Project, off southeast and southern Brazil’s coast off the states of Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul, ranging in depth from 25 to 128 meters. The new species, H. shoemakeri sp. nov., is similar to H. videns K.H. Barnard, 1930; however, the former species can be distinguished by: pereopod 7 basis posterior margin serrate with acute teeth, merus posterior margin not produced; epimeral plate 3 posteroventral corner with a longer acute projection, posterior margin almost straight; uropod 3 outer ramus article 2 clearly notable in both sexes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Benthic Amphipod Crustaceans in Indonesian Seas
    The distribution of benthic amphipod crustaceans in Indonesian seas Tri Arfianti1 and Mark John Costello2,3 1 Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Cibinong, Jawa Barat, Indonesia 2 School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 3 Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway ABSTRACT Amphipod crustaceans are an essential component of tropical marine biodiversity. However, their distribution and biogeography have not been analysed in one of the world's largest tropical countries nested in the Coral Triangle, Indonesia. We collected and identified amphipod crustaceans from eight sites in Indonesian waters and combined the results with data from 32 additional sites in the literature. We analysed the geographic distribution of 147 benthic amphipod crustaceans using cluster analysis and the `Bioregions Infomaps' neural network method of biogeographic discrimination. We found five groups of benthic amphipod crustaceans which show relationships with sampling methods, depth, and substrata. Neural network biogeographic analysis indicated there was only one biogeographic region that matched with the global amphipod regions and marine biogeographic realms defined for all marine taxa. There was no support for Wallaces or other lines being marine biogeographic boundaries in the region. Species richness was lower than expected considering the region is within the Coral Triangle. We hypothesise that this low richness might be due to the intense fish predation which may have limited
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Biodiversity: a Taxonomic Inventory of Fauna
    Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna Irish Wildlife Manual No. 38 Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna S. E. Ferriss, K. G. Smith, and T. P. Inskipp (editors) Citations: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Section author (2009) Section title . In: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photos: © Kevin G. Smith and Sarah E. Ferriss Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: N. Kingston and F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 1393 - 6670 Inventory of Irish fauna ____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................3 Methodology........................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial DNA (COI) Analyses Reveal That Amphipod Diversity Is Associated with Environmental Heterogeneity in Deepsea Habita
    Molecular Ecology (2012) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05729.x Mitochondrial DNA (COI) analyses reveal that amphipod diversity is associated with environmental heterogeneity in deep-sea habitats MATTHEW A. KNOX,* IAN D. HOGG,* CONRAD A. PILDITCH,* ANNE-NINA LO¨ RZ,† PAUL D. N. HEBERT‡ and DIRK STEINKE‡ *Department of Biological Sciences, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand, †National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Ltd, Private Bag 14901, Wellington, New Zealand, ‡Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada Abstract The relationship between species diversity and environmental parameters is poorly understood for the mobile macrofauna of deep-sea habitats due to under-sampling and subsequent lack of accurate taxonomic information. To redress this, cytochrome oxi- dase c subunit I (COI) DNA sequences were used to estimate species diversity and to compare phoxocephalid amphipod assemblages among 20 stations encompassing a range of environmental conditions. Two regions, east (Chatham Rise) and west (Chal- lenger Plateau) of New Zealand were sampled to depths of 200–1200 m with an epibenthic sled. Using a comparison among identified morphospecies, we found a clear gap in sequence divergences between 6% and 13% and used a 6% threshold to designate molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs), as a surrogate to putative species. DNA sequences (n = 297) revealed high total diversity (n = 49 MOTUs), as well as high beta diversity (28 MOTUs found at single location only). Novel phoxo- cephalid MOTUs were found at most stations, especially on Challenger Plateau and the flanks of Chatham Rise.
    [Show full text]