Alpha Centauri at a Crossroads by Tom Ayres Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alpha Centauri at a Crossroads by Tom Ayres Contents Chandra News Chandra News Issue 24 Spring 2017 Alpha Centauri at a Crossroads by Tom Ayres Contents Alpha Centauri at a Crossroads ��� � � � � � � � � � � � 1 Director’s Log � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8 Project Scientist’s Report � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 10 Program Manager’s Report ��� � � � � � � � � � � � � 11 Chandra Source Catalog ��� � � � � � � � � � � � � � 12 Authentic Data Inquiry a Focus in STEM Programs � � � � � � � 12 HiPS: the Future of Chandra Data Visualization � � � � � � � � 14 Recent Updates to Chandra Calibration � � � � � � � � � � 15 Michael Juda (1959–2016) � � � � � � � � � � � � � 16 ACIS Update � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 18 Martin Zombeck (1936–2016) � � � � � � � � � � � � 19 HRC Update � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 20 HETG Update � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 21 LETG Update ��� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 26 CIAO 4.9 and Beyond � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 29 The Results of the Cycle 18 Peer Review � � � � � � � � � � 32 Einstein Fellowship Program � � � � � � � � � � � � � 36 2016 Press Releases � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 37 An August Week: Chandra Science for the Next Decade � � � � � � 38 The Chandra Newsletter appears once a year and is edited by Rodolfo Montez Jr., with editorial assistance and layout by Tara Gokas. We welcome contributions from readers. Comments on the newsletter, or corrections and additions to the hardcopy mailing list should be sent to: [email protected]. Follow the Chandra Director's Office on Facebook, Google+ and Twitter (@ChandraCDO). Spring 2017 1 Alpha Centauri at a Crossroads The two larger stars, Alpha Cen A and B, are in a relative- ly tight 80-year orbit, about the size of the outer Solar Sys- Tom Ayres tem. Tiny C, not much bigger than Jupiter, revolves around Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy the central pair at a great distance, a few hundred times that University of Colorado of Pluto from the Sun, taking perhaps half a million years Boulder, Colorado to make a full circuit. C just happens to be on the sunward At the Dillon Dam Brewery side of AB at the moment, temporarily claiming the honor “Proxima.” iz and I were celebrating New Year’s Eve up in the Alpha Cen A is an early-G-type dwarf, almost identi- Lmountains, at the Dillon Dam Brewery, with our friend cal to our Sun, although slightly more massive, larger, and Sally. During the lull after the band’s first set, Sally turned more luminous. Its companion, Alpha Cen B, is an ear- to me and asked, slyly, “So, Mr. Astronomer, what’s up with ly-K star, slightly less massive, smaller, and dimmer than the nearest star?” I hesitated, wary of an ASTRO-101 trick the Sun. Stellar structure studies suggest that the system is question from the mischievous Sally, an education spe- metal-rich, about twice solar, with an age of perhaps 6 bil- cialist. Accordingly, I launched into a discussion of all the lion years, somewhat older than the Sun (Flannery & Ayres amazing new things we astronomers were learning about 1978; Eggenberger et al. 2004). our Sun, especially why this cool star (if you consider 6000 In fact, the nearby hierarchical triple contains exam- Kelvin “cool”) has a super-hot, million degree outer atmo- ples of all the most common types of the Milky Way’s cool sphere, the corona. (Mention of the solar “coronal heating stars: those that sustain outer convective envelopes. These problem” caused Liz, of the biotech world, to glaze over “late-type” stars often are afflicted by surface magnetic a bit: she had heard all this before. To be sure, I often get “starspots” (whose intense fields suppress vertical kinetic the same response from colleagues on the “Dark Side,” al- transport of energy, leading to local darkening); the heart of though to be fair, AGN also have hot coronae and their own stellar activity. This is what powers the Sun’s Space Weather, coronal heating problem.) I continued with an impassioned mentioned earlier, with its numerous potentially bad con- description of all the good that the Sun does for our Earth, sequences for our technological civilization (GPS and cell glossing over the bad stuff coming up in the far distant fu- phones at risk, need I say more?). ture (as the Sun inexorably brightens), except to mention Breakthrough Starshot: Voyage to Alpha Centauri the impact of solar “Space Weather” on our planet, reason As I drifted into the discussion of magnetic activity, I enough to keep a watchful eye on our nearby star. sensed I was in danger of losing my—albeit small, though “Very cute, Tommy,” Liz interrupted, “but you know Sal- so far politely attentive—audience, so I decided to amp up ly really was asking about the next nearest star.” “Well, nice the Alpha Centauri narrative. “Hey Sals,” I asked, “have you try,” I thought. So, I shifted gears into a new mini-lecture heard about the crazy new project called Starshot, to send a about “Proxima b,” an Earth-sized, probably rocky, planet swarm of nanobots to Alpha Centauri sometime this centu- in the Habitable Zone of Proxima Centauri, a diminutive ry?” Liz knew about this already, and rolled her eyes brief- red dwarf that still holds the title of the Sun’s nearest stellar ly. I went on to describe the out-of-the-box idea from the neighbor. But I didn’t stop there. I went on to opine that Cover image: 2MASS near-IR field around Alpha Centauri A Proxima was pretty wimpy, as stars go, but, remarkably, has and B (center black dots) with superimposed montage of Chan- a couple of bigger, more sunlike siblings close-by. Together, dra X-ray imaging (blue) of the pair over the past 15 years (see expanded view in inset image). Full map is about 0.5° on a side. these three stars comprise the Alpha Centauri system. Figure 1: Rogues gallery: Sun, the Alpha Centauri stars, and Jupiter to scale. 2 CXC Newsletter Breakthrough Initiatives Foundation to launch credit-card The Solar-Stellar Connection sized “starchips,” carried by laser-propelled light sails, for a Thankfully—for Liz and Sally—the band returned from decades-long trip to nearby stars, ultimately to photograph, its break, and the dancers re-took the floor, in anticipation up close and personal, any habitable planets around them. of the New Year only an hour or so away. With my compan- I explained that the nearest stars are in fact unimaginably ions otherwise diverted, my thoughts wandered back to my far away. For example, our most advanced rocket-propelled first encounters with Alpha Centauri, culminating in my spacecraft—New Horizons, which recently flew past Plu- more recent high-energy adventures with Chandra. to—would need about a thousand centuries to reach Alpha I, and my colleagues, have long been interested in Al- Centauri, even at its record speed. pha Cen AB because they are so similar to the Sun; perfect To break the “Tyranny of the Rocket Equation,” Starshot subjects for what we call the “Solar-Stellar Connection.” envisions a one-way trip, traveling fast and light, relying on We know a lot about the Sun for the simple reason that it external propulsion. A giant Earth-based laser “beamer”— is only light minutes away, whereas the nearest stars are effectively a square-kilometer optical telescope—boosts the several light years, or more. However, the Sun is just one starchips to a stunning 20% of lightspeed. Even so, the jour- example of a G-type star at a particular stage of evolution, ney to Alpha Centauri would take more than twenty years formed with a specific set of initial chemical abundances, (with an another 4.3 years for any transmissions from the seed magnetic fields, rotation rate and other properties that nanobots back to Earth). might, or might not, be representative of G-type stars in The beamer blasts the photon-sails on their way, staged general. It’s like choosing a person from the crowd at the from a mother ship in high Earth orbit; but also receives, decades later, the faint laser downlinks from the starchips Dam Brewery, and examining her carefully to deduce what as they race through their brief, hours-long encounter with human beings are all about. Sure, you would learn a lot, Alpha Cen. Because the journey has multiple hazards— but then again there would be a lot you would miss. It’s the mainly interstellar dust and gas along the way—you have to same idea with the Solar-Stellar Connection: build a ba- send many, perhaps thousands, of the nanobots to hope for sic framework anchored in the Sun, then extend outward a few to survive. through—necessarily more superficial—consideration of Alpha Cen is an obvious first target of Starshot, because the more remote stars. second closest—“Barnard’s Star,” an unremarkable old red Back in the 1970’s, when I was a grad student at Colora- dwarf—is a couple of light years further on. Also, there are do, then postdoc at the Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, we were three possible hosts for habitable planets in the Alpha Cen pretty much stuck analyzing optical activity indicators of system, and we already know there’s at least one, Proxima b. the stars, like the faint “chromospheric” cores at the bot- Wacky as it might seem, Starshot is the only way, with toms of the strong K and H resonance absorption lines of foreseeable technology, to explore the nearest stars. Thus, singly ionized calcium (at 3933 Å and 3968 Å). The more it’s worth, well, a shot. dependable X-rays (symptomatic of million-degree coronal gas) were mostly beyond reach. Aside from the Sun, only very intense emissions from compact binaries with neutron stars or black holes were known at the time. The chromosphere, itself, is a temperature inversion layer in the solar atmosphere about 500 kilometers above the Sun’s visible surface, something like the Earth’s Ther- mosphere.
Recommended publications
  • Lecture-29 (PDF)
    Life in the Universe Orin Harris and Greg Anderson Department of Physics & Astronomy Northeastern Illinois University Spring 2021 c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 1 / 95 Overview Dating Rocks Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 2 / 95 Dating Rocks Zircon Dating Sedimentary Grand Canyon Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Dating Rocks Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 3 / 95 Zircon Dating Zircon, (ZrSiO4), minerals incorporate trace amounts of uranium but reject lead. Naturally occuring uranium: • U-238: 99.27% • U-235: 0.72% Decay chains: • 238U −→ 206Pb, τ =4.47 Gyrs. • 235U −→ 207Pb, τ = 704 Myrs. 1956, Clair Camron Patterson dated the Canyon Diablo meteorite: τ =4.55 Gyrs. c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 4 / 95 Dating Sedimentary Rocks • Relative ages: Deeper layers were deposited earlier • Absolute ages: Decay of radioactive isotopes old (deposited last) oldest (depositedolder first) c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 5 / 95 Grand Canyon: Earth History from 200 million - 2 billion yrs ago. Dating Rocks Life on Earth Earth History Timeline Late Heavy Bombardment Hadean Shark Bay Stromatolites Cyanobacteria Q: Earliest Fossils? Life on Earth O2 History Q: Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials Challenges for the Starshot Lightsail
    PERSPECTIVE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0075-8 Materials challenges for the Starshot lightsail Harry A. Atwater 1*, Artur R. Davoyan1, Ognjen Ilic1, Deep Jariwala1, Michelle C. Sherrott 1, Cora M. Went2, William S. Whitney2 and Joeson Wong 1 The Starshot Breakthrough Initiative established in 2016 sets an audacious goal of sending a spacecraft beyond our Solar System to a neighbouring star within the next half-century. Its vision for an ultralight spacecraft that can be accelerated by laser radiation pressure from an Earth-based source to ~20% of the speed of light demands the use of materials with extreme properties. Here we examine stringent criteria for the lightsail design and discuss fundamental materials challenges. We pre- dict that major research advances in photonic design and materials science will enable us to define the pathways needed to realize laser-driven lightsails. he Starshot Breakthrough Initiative has challenged a broad nanocraft, we reveal a balance between the high reflectivity of the and interdisciplinary community of scientists and engineers sail, required for efficient photon momentum transfer; large band- Tto design an ultralight spacecraft or ‘nanocraft’ that can reach width, accounting for the Doppler shift; and the low mass necessary Proxima Centauri b — an exoplanet within the habitable zone of for the spacecraft to accelerate to near-relativistic speeds. We show Proxima Centauri and 4.2 light years away from Earth — in approxi- that nanophotonic structures may be well-suited to meeting such mately
    [Show full text]
  • Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects
    Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G First Year Report Prepared by: Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, Rhonda Stevenson Tau Zero Foundation Business Office: 1053 East Third Avenue Broomfield, CO 80020 Prepared for: NASA Headquarters, Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Washington, DC 20546 June 2018 Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx pg 1 of 69 ABSTRACT Progress toward developing an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options is described. The goal is to contrast the challenges, mission choices, and emerging prospects for propulsion and power, to identify which prospects might be more advantageous and under what circumstances, and to identify which technology details might have greater impacts. Unlike prior studies, the infrastructure expenses and prospects for breakthrough advances are included. This first year's focus is on determining the key questions to enable the analysis. Accordingly, a work breakdown structure to organize the information and associated list of variables is offered. A flow diagram of the basic analysis is presented, as well as more detailed methods to convert the performance measures of disparate propulsion methods into common measures of energy, mass, time, and power. Other methods for equitable comparisons include evaluating the prospects under the same assumptions of payload, mission trajectory, and available energy. Missions are divided into three eras of readiness (precursors, era of infrastructure, and era of breakthroughs) as a first step before proceeding to include comparisons of technology advancement rates. Final evaluation "figures of merit" are offered. Preliminary lists of mission architectures and propulsion prospects are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosignatures Search in Habitable Planets
    galaxies Review Biosignatures Search in Habitable Planets Riccardo Claudi 1,* and Eleonora Alei 1,2 1 INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Padova, Vicolo Osservatorio, 5, 35122 Padova, Italy 2 Physics and Astronomy Department, Padova University, 35131 Padova, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 2 August 2019; Accepted: 25 September 2019; Published: 29 September 2019 Abstract: The search for life has had a new enthusiastic restart in the last two decades thanks to the large number of new worlds discovered. The about 4100 exoplanets found so far, show a large diversity of planets, from hot giants to rocky planets orbiting small and cold stars. Most of them are very different from those of the Solar System and one of the striking case is that of the super-Earths, rocky planets with masses ranging between 1 and 10 M⊕ with dimensions up to twice those of Earth. In the right environment, these planets could be the cradle of alien life that could modify the chemical composition of their atmospheres. So, the search for life signatures requires as the first step the knowledge of planet atmospheres, the main objective of future exoplanetary space explorations. Indeed, the quest for the determination of the chemical composition of those planetary atmospheres rises also more general interest than that given by the mere directory of the atmospheric compounds. It opens out to the more general speculation on what such detection might tell us about the presence of life on those planets. As, for now, we have only one example of life in the universe, we are bound to study terrestrial organisms to assess possibilities of life on other planets and guide our search for possible extinct or extant life on other planetary bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing a Solar Sailing Polar Mission to the Sun
    Optimizing a Solar Sailing Polar Mission to the Sun Development and Application of a New Ant Colony Optimizer Giacomo Acciarini Optimizing a Solar Sailing Polar Mission to the Sun Development and Application of a New Ant Colony Optimizer by Giacomo Acciarini to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Friday November 1, 2019 at 1:30 PM. Student number: 4754883 Project duration: January 4, 2019 – November 1, 2019 Thesis committee: Prof. Dr. P. Visser, TU Delft, chair Dr. ir. E. Mooij, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. F. Oliviero, TU Delft Dr. D. Izzo, European Space Agency This thesis is confidential and cannot be made public until December 31, 2020. An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Cover image credit: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jun/11/ spacewatch-lightsail-deploys-solar-sail, date of access: August 2019. ii Preface After months of hard work, I am proud to present to you my thesis to obtain the Master of Science degree at the faculty of Aerospace Engineering, at the Delft University of Technology. It has been an amazing experience that allowed me to come in contact with many researchers from all over the world who share my same love and interest in space exploration. I have always felt privileged and honored to be able to study such a marvelous and challenging subject. First of all, I would thus like to thank my parents, Andrea and Manuela, and my sister, Chiara, without your help and support I would have never been able to reach this point.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Map of HEAPA-Related Future Missions HEAPA 4Th Future Plan Review Committee 2020/10-2022/9 Lead: Kazuhiro Nakazawa (Nagoya-U/KMI)
    20th HEAPA WS 2021/3/8-10 Road map of HEAPA-related future missions HEAPA 4th Future Plan Review Committee 2020/10-2022/9 Lead: Kazuhiro Nakazawa (Nagoya-U/KMI) JAXA Summary of the 3rd committee outcome Vision Preface Astronomical X-ray and Gamma-ray observations are directly related with understanding the how matter and energy exits within the Universe, not only celestial objects, but also the volume itself. They are also key enablers to dig into the extreme physics. In the two broadest aims of astrophysical research, understand the Universe as of now, and understand how it came to be as such, high-energy astrophysics plays an essential role. Summary of the 3rd committee outcome Vision: three big goals Understand our Universe; matter, energy and spacetime, and its origin Dark matter : LSS/clusters to see where DM are, and search for DM direct signal Missing baryon : how the baryon and metals are distributed in the Universe Origins of the large diversity in Universe and celestial objects Galaxy and SMBH co-evolution and their impact on re-ionization Metal synthesis in the Universe Relativistic high-energy phenomena in the Universe Verifying fundamental physics in extreme condition Extreme gravitation : stellar-mass BH, SMBH Extreme high-density matter EoS : Neutron star, quark star Extreme magnetism : Magnetar Diffusive shock : wide variety of yet to be known interactions therein Dark Matter (Re): search for its direct signal Summary of the 3rd committee outcome Mission Categories by JAXA class How to launch Definition and budget Strategic H-IIA, H-III Top science. Flagship mission of Large class each community.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics for Students' Presentations Problems in Long Distance (Human) Space Travel New Propulsion Tech
    06/03/2019 Life in the Universe 2019 - Student talks - Google Docs Topics for students’ presentations ● Problems in long distance (human) space travel ○ New propulsion technologies Paul Richter ○ Social aspects? ○ life in zero‑gravity ○ communication ● Prospects for long‑term human missions within the Solar systems: ○ Elon Musk's plan to send humans to Mars F. Stabel ○ What would be the point of a lunar base? ● Testing extra‑terrestrial habitats on Earth ○ NEEMO, Mars500, Desert RATS experiments ● Future (and proposed) space missions and/or observational facilities to look for life‑/bio‑ signatures: Artem Mosienko ○ On Europa ○ on Exo‑planets ● Solar‑system bodies as potentially life‑bearing systems: B. Prinoth ○ Europa ○ Titan ○ Enceladus ○ Mars ● Experiments to search for Life on Mars: ○ Past and present (Viking missions to now) ○ Martian meteorites (ALH‑64?) 20 years on, include possibly media response at the time to idea of evidence for extraterrestrial life ○ Future in situ experiments on Mars ● SETI projects : ○ Breakthrough Initiatives ○ SETI@Home ○ What are the fundamental assumptions behind SETI experiments, and what do they imply (i.e., similar to Drake Eq.) Sven Kiefer ● Observational signatures of advanced civilizations Leon Raabe ● Remote detection of Life on Earth (How far away can we detect Human signals, e.g. TV) Yves Sibony ● Summary of what is known about the exosolar asteroid ( 'Oumuamua ) Andrea Weibel https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qZdVVX3bP5kyfftaQazeXs3l7sP3TQDq9mL9uGLHrjE/edit# 1/4 06/03/2019 Life in the Universe 2019 - Student talks - Google Docs ● How good is the evidence for an asymmetry of left‑ and right‑ handed organic molecules in nature and where could such an asymmetry come from? O.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcus: the X-Ray Grating Spectrometer Explorer R
    Arcus: The X-ray Grating Spectrometer Explorer R. K. Smith*a, M. Abrahamb, R. Allureda, M. Bautzc, J. Bookbinderd, J. Bregmane, L. Brennemana, N. S. Brickhousea, D. Burrowsf, V. Burwitzg, P. N. Cheimetsa, E. Costantinih, S. Dawsonc, C. DeRooa, A. Falconef, A. R. Fostera, L. Galloi, C. E. Grantc, H. M. Güntherc, R. K. Heilmannc, E. Hertza, B. Hined, D. Huenemoerderc, J. S. Kaastrah, I. Kreykenbohmj, K. K. Madsenk, R. McEntafferf, E. Millerc, J. Millere, E. Morsel, R. Mushotzkym, K. Nandrag, M. Nowakc, F. Paerelsn, R. Petreo, K. Poppenhaegerp, A. Ptako, P. Reida, J. Sandersg, M. Schattenburgc, N. Schulzc, A. Smaleo, P. Temid, L. Valencicq, S. Walkerd, R. Willingaler, J. Wilmsj, S. J. Wolka aSmithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA, US; bThe Aerospace Corp, Pasadena, CA, US, cMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, US; dNASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, CA US; eUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, US; fThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, US; gMax-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, DE; hS- RON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht, NL; iSaint Mary’s University, Halifax, Canada; jFrie- drich-Alexander-Universitaet, Erlangen-Nürnberg, DE; kCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, US; lOrbital ATK, Dulles, VA, US; mUniversity of Maryland, College Park, MD, US; nColumbia University, New York, NY, US; oNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, US, pQueen’s University, Belfast, UK; qJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, US; rUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, UK 1. ABSTRACT Arcus, a Medium Explorer (MIDEX) mission, was selected by NASA for a Phase A study in August 2017. The observatory provides high-resolution soft X-ray spectroscopy in the 12-50Å bandpass with unprecedent- ed sensitivity: effective areas of >450 cm2 and spectral resolution >2500.
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th HEAD Meeting Session Table of Contents
    16th HEAD Meeting Sun Valley, Idaho – August, 2017 Meeting Abstracts Session Table of Contents 99 – Public Talk - Revealing the Hidden, High Energy Sun, 204 – Mid-Career Prize Talk - X-ray Winds from Black Rachel Osten Holes, Jon Miller 100 – Solar/Stellar Compact I 205 – ISM & Galaxies 101 – AGN in Dwarf Galaxies 206 – First Results from NICER: X-ray Astrophysics from 102 – High-Energy and Multiwavelength Polarimetry: the International Space Station Current Status and New Frontiers 300 – Black Holes Across the Mass Spectrum 103 – Missions & Instruments Poster Session 301 – The Future of Spectral-Timing of Compact Objects 104 – First Results from NICER: X-ray Astrophysics from 302 – Synergies with the Millihertz Gravitational Wave the International Space Station Poster Session Universe 105 – Galaxy Clusters and Cosmology Poster Session 303 – Dissertation Prize Talk - Stellar Death by Black 106 – AGN Poster Session Hole: How Tidal Disruption Events Unveil the High 107 – ISM & Galaxies Poster Session Energy Universe, Eric Coughlin 108 – Stellar Compact Poster Session 304 – Missions & Instruments 109 – Black Holes, Neutron Stars and ULX Sources Poster 305 – SNR/GRB/Gravitational Waves Session 306 – Cosmic Ray Feedback: From Supernova Remnants 110 – Supernovae and Particle Acceleration Poster Session to Galaxy Clusters 111 – Electromagnetic & Gravitational Transients Poster 307 – Diagnosing Astrophysics of Collisional Plasmas - A Session Joint HEAD/LAD Session 112 – Physics of Hot Plasmas Poster Session 400 – Solar/Stellar Compact II 113
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of X-Rayastronomy
    The Future of X-rayAstronomy Keith Arnaud [email protected] High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center University of Maryland College Park and NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Themes Politics Efficient high resolution spectroscopy Mirrors Polarimetry Other missions Interferometry Themes Politics Efficient high resolution spectroscopy Mirrors Polarimetry Other missions Interferometry How do we get a new X-ray astronomy experiment? A group of scientists and engineers makes a proposal to a national (or international) space agency. This will include a science case and a description of the technology to be used (which should generally be in a mature state). In principal you can make an unsolicited proposal but in practice space agencies have proposal rounds in the same way that individual missions have observing proposal rounds. NASA : Small Explorer (SMEX) and Medium Explorer (MIDEX): every ~2 years alternating Small and Medium, three selected for study for one year from which one is selected for launch. RXTE, GALEX, NuSTAR, Swift, IXPE Arcus, a high resolution X-ray spectroscopy mission was a finalist in the latest MIDEX round but was not selected. Missions of Opportunity (MO): every ~2 years includes balloon programs, ISS instruments and contributions to foreign missions. Suzaku, Hitomi, NICER, XRISM Large missions such as HST, Chandra, JWST are not selected by such proposals but are decided as national priorities through the Astronomy Decadal process. Every ten years a survey is run by the National Academy of Sciences to decide on priorities for both land-based and space-based astronomy. 1960: HST; 1970: VLA; 1980: VLBA; 1990: Chandra and SIRTF; 2000: JWST and ALMA; 2010 WFIRST and LSST.
    [Show full text]
  • Hubble Finds Clues to the Birth of Supermassive Black Holes 24 May 2016
    Hubble finds clues to the birth of supermassive black holes 24 May 2016 Space Telescope to find and identify the two objects. Both of these newly discovered black hole seed candidates are seen less than a billion years after the Big Bang and have an initial mass of about 100 000 times the Sun. "Our discovery, if confirmed, would explain how these monster black holes were born," said Fabio Pacucci, lead author of the study, of Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa, Italy. This new result helps to explain why we see supermassive black holes less than one billion years after the Big Bang. This artist's impression shows a possible seed for the formation of a supermassive black hole. Two of these possible seeds were discovered by an Italian team, using three space telescopes: the NASA Chandra X-ray Observatory, the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, and the NASA Spitzer Space Telescope. Credit: NASA/CXC/M. Weiss Astrophysicists have taken a major step forward in understanding how supermassive black holes formed. Using data from Hubble and two other space telescopes, Italian researchers have found the best evidence yet for the seeds that ultimately grow into these cosmic giants. For years astronomers have debated how the earliest generation of supermassive black holes formed very quickly, relatively speaking, after the Big Bang. Now, an Italian team has identified two objects in the early Universe that seem to be the origin of these early supermassive black holes. This image shows one of two detected supermassive The two objects represent the most promising black hole seeds, OBJ29323, as it is seen by the black hole seed candidates found so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee for 2017
    Director’s Office 933 North Cherry Avenue Steward Observatory P.O. Box 210065 URL: www.as.arizona.edu Tucson, AZ 85721-0065 Telephone: (520) 621-6524 [email protected] March 15, 2018 Dr. France A. Córdova, Director National Science Foundation 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 19000 Alexandria, VA 22314 Mr. Robert M. Lightfoot, Jr., Acting Administrator Office of the Administrator NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001 Mr. Richard Perry, Secretary of Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 The Honorable John Thune, Chairman Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Lisa Murkowski, Chairwoman Committee on Energy & Natural Resources United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Lamar Smith, Chairman Committee on Science, Space and Technology United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Dr. Córdova, Mr. Lightfoot, Secretary Perry, Chairman Thune, Chairwoman Murkowski, and Chairman Smith: I am pleased to transmit to you the annual report of the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee for 2017. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee was established under the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 Public Law 107-368 to: (1) assess, and make recommendations regarding, the coordination of astronomy and astrophysics programs of the Foundation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Department of Energy; Arizona’s First University – Since 1885 Dr.
    [Show full text]