Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates For
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Defecography: Technique, Interpretation, and Current Use Arden M
9 Defecography: Technique, Interpretation, and Current Use Arden M. Morris and Susan C. Parker Defecography, or evacuation proctography, is the on technique, interpretation, and implications dynamic study of expulsion of radiopaque mate- for specific patient populations. rial from the rectum, in order to assess changing anatomic relationships of the pelvic floor and associated organs during evacuation. In 1952, Indications for Testing Wallden 1 first described enteroceles, sigmoido- celes, and rectoceles, using roentgenogram Constipation techniques developed to evaluate patients with symptoms of obstructed defecation. He postu- Defecography was initially developed to assess lated that such outlet obstruction was due to an patients with complaints of constipation and a abnormally deep rectogenital pouch and could sensation of rectal outlet obstruction. The diag- be corrected surgically. However, performing nostic armamentarium has expanded to include these static studies using rectal, vaginal, and anal manometry, electromyography, and colonic small bowel contrast was a cumbersome, expen- transit time studies, all of which are crucial for sive, and embarrassing process for the patient. distinguishing end-organ versus total organ Recognizing the limitations of these studies, etiologies. Therefore, although the major indi- subsequent authors streamlined the procedure cation for performing defecography continues to over the ensuing three decades. be constipation, other complaints may occasion- Broden and Snellman2 proposed the use of ally warrant defecographic evaluation. Table 9.1 cineradiographic methods and a physiologic demonstrates the primary indications and their position, which contributed enormously to the proportionate prevalence among our referred simultaneous study of function and anatomy. patients. There is considerable overlap in many Several centers built radiolucent commodes with of these symptoms and diagnoses. -
An International Urogynecological
AN INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (IUGA) / INTERNATIONAL CONTINENCE SOCIETY (ICS) JOINT REPORT ON THE TERMINOLOGY FOR FEMALE ANORECTAL DYSFUNCTION Abdul H Sultan^, Ash Monga # ^, Joseph Lee*^, Anton Emmanuel^, Christine Norton^, Giulio Santoro^, Tracy Hull^, Bary Berghmans #^, Stuart Brody^, Bernard T. Haylen *^, Standardization and Terminology Committees IUGA* & ICS#, Joint IUGA / ICS Working Group on Female Anorectal Terminology^ Abdul H Sultan, MB ChB, MD, FRCOG Urogynaecologist and Obstetrician Croydon University Hospital, Croydon. United Kingdom Ash Monga, MB ChB, FRCOG Urogynaecologist Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton. United Kingdom. Joseph Lee, MB ChB, FRANZCOG, CU Urogynaecologist Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne. Victoria. Australia. Anton Emmanuel, Gastroenterologist University College Hospital, London. United Kingdom Christine Norton, Professor of Clinical Nursing St Mary's Hospital, London. United Kingdom. Giulio Santoro, Colorectal surgeon Regional Hospital, Treviso. Italy. Tracy Hull, Professor of Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland. Ohio. U.S.A. Bary Berghmans, Clinical epidemiologist and physiotherapist Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht. Netherlands. Stuart Brody, Professor of Psychology University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, United Kingdom Bernard T. Haylen, Professor University of New South Wales, Sydney. N.S.W. Australia. IUGA-ICS Terminology on Female Anorectal Dysfunction Sultan AH et al, Version 25 (16Mar14) Page 1 Correspondence to: Mr Abdul H Sultan, Urogynaecology and -
Evidence Review H: Lifestyle and Conservative Management Options for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Final Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management [H] Evidence reviews for lifestyle and conservative management options for pelvic organ prolapse NICE guideline NG123 Evidence reviews April 2019 Final These evidence reviews were developed by the National Guideline Alliance hosted by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists FINAL Error! No text of specified style in document. Disclaimer The recommendations in this guideline represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, professionals are expected to take this guideline fully into account, alongside the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients or service users. The recommendations in this guideline are not mandatory and the guideline does not override the responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or their carer or guardian. Local commissioners and/or providers have a responsibility to enable the guideline to be applied when individual health professionals and their patients or service users wish to use it. They should do so in the context of local and national priorities for funding and developing services, and in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to reduce health inequalities. Nothing in this guideline should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with compliance with those duties. NICE guidelines cover health and care in England. Decisions on how they apply in other UK countries are made by ministers in the Welsh Government, Scottish Government, and Northern Ireland Executive. -
Pelvic Prolapse
Pelvic Prolapse Symptoms and Treatment CYstOCELE RECTOCELE ENTEROCELE COMBINED To make an appointment or ask a question, call the Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery at 617-636-6190. 800 Washington Street For urgent problems, call the Tufts Medical Center Boston, MA 02111 operator at 617-636-5000 and ask for the 617-636-5000 on-call physician for Colon and Rectal Surgery. www.tuftsmedicalcenter.org 09-062 2011 Pelvic prolapse includes several condi- DIAGNOSES REPAIRS tions that occur when pelvic organs bulge Pelvic prolapse may include any of the following specific Surgery may include: down into or out of the vagina or rectum. conditions: ▶ Rectocele repair — rectal approach Most pelvic prolapse occurs in women. ▶ Rectocele: bulging of the rectum into the vagina ▶ Rectocele repair — vaginal approach ▶ Cystocele: bulging of the bladder into the vagina ▶ Rectocele repair — abdominal approach Factors that may increase the risk of pelvic prolapse ▶ Enterocele: bulging of loops of small intestine into ▶ Cystocele repair include: the vagina ▶ TVT — transvaginal tape repair ▶ advancing age ▶ Sigmoidocele: bulging of the sigmoid colon into ▶ Rectal prolapse repair — abdominal ▶ multiple or difficult deliveries the vagina ▶ Rectal prolapse repair — perineal ▶ injury to the pelvic organs or muscles ▶ Urinary incontinence: unable to control urine ▶ Perineoplasty ▶ smoking ▶ Fecal incontinence: unable to control stool or gas ▶ Other ▶ use of steroid medications ▶ Constipation ▶ chronic lung disease ▶ Uterine prolapse Although many women develop some degree of pelvic ▶ Rectal prolapse prolapse as they age, many do not need treatment. ▶ Vaginal prolapse Medical treatment may include pelvic floor exercises, vaginal creams (usually containing estrogen) or use of a pessary (vaginal support ring). -
Prolapse Repair Using Non-Synthetic Material: What Is the Current Standard?
Current Urology Reports (2019) 20:70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0939-8 LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS & VOIDING DYSFUNCTION (J SANDHU, SECTION EDITOR) Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard? Ricardo Palmerola1 & Nirit Rosenblum 1 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose of Review Due to recent concerns over the use of synthetic mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery, there has been a renewed interest in the utilization of non-synthetic repairs for pelvic organ prolapse. The purpose of this review is to review the current literature regarding pelvic organ prolapse repairs performed without the utilization of synthetic mesh. Recent Findings Native tissue repairs provide a durable surgical option for pelvic organ prolapse. Based on recent findings of recently performed randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up, transvaginal native tissue repair continues to play a role in the management of pelvic organ prolapse without the added risk associated with synthetic mesh. Summary In 2019, the FDA called for manufacturers of synthetic mesh for transvaginal mesh to stop selling and distributing their products in the USA. Native tissue and non-synthetic pelvic organ prolapse repairs provide an efficacious alternative without the added risk inherent to the utilization of transvaginal mesh. A recent, multicenter, randomized clinical trial demonstrated no clear advantage to the utilization of synthetic mesh. Furthermore, transvaginal native tissue repairs have demonstrated good long-term efficacy, particularly when anatomic success is not the sole metric used to define surgical success. Keywords Pelvicorganprolapse .Cystocele .Enterocele .Rectocele .Syntheticmesh .Transvaginal mesh .Uterosacralligament suspension . -
When Is Surgery Warranted for Hemorrhoids Necessary
When Is Surgery Warranted For Hemorrhoids Necessary Half-blooded and convincing Quinn always countermand unflatteringly and bruting his disfigurement. Ascribable reordainsKelwin unsheathe her Cornishman his monera braved adhered pertinently. oppressively. Balkiest Yance debugs venturously and licentiously, she Although the Haemorrhoid Artery Ligation HAL operation provides a low. Hemorrhoids surgical excision may hot be warranted when Figure 4 Operative. If reduction is unsuccessful, obtain surgical consultation. Fecal matter leaves your condition can become symptomatic external hemorrhoids gently washing compared light and fissure first, hiperplasia e congestão venosa. If necessary to red blood vessels or reproduced in showing rectal surgeon will redirect to regular intervals until surgery when is surgery warranted for hemorrhoids necessary and hematochezia that aims to. Randomized trial of is when surgery warranted for hemorrhoids necessary herbal and volume and complication. This distinction is made for bleeding gastric stump suspension for performing extensive scarring and. Longer boil-up is needed to ensure favorable long-term subjective and objective. The ih was very important science stories of recurrence rates, one always consult your chances of fistula is a type. Taking a warm sitz bath can relieve symptoms. The dst stapler suturing in those with laxatives and for surgery when is warranted hemorrhoids necessary before and. For some chronic constipation, when is surgery warranted for hemorrhoids who would be hemorrhoids here to other locations, an array of your surgeon will never ignore professional medical records of. During sexual intercourse is warranted for surgery when is hemorrhoids necessary for hemorrhoidopexy has the characteristics can up to the results or run tests are necessary and the anus. -
MR Defecography for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
Published online: 2021-07-30 ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY MR defecography for obstructed defecation syndrome Ravikumar B Thapar, Roysuneel V Patankar1, Ritesh D Kamat, Radhika R Thapar, Vipul Chemburkar Departments of Radiology and 1Surgery, Joy Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Correspondence: Dr. Ravikumar B Thapar, 302, Amar Residency, Punjabwadi, ST Road, Deonar, Mumbai ‑ 400 088, Maharashtra, India. E‑mail: [email protected] Abstract Patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) form an important subset of patients with chronic constipation. Evaluation and treatment of these patients has traditionally been difficult. Magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) is a very useful tool for the evaluation of these patients. We evaluated the scans and records of 192 consecutive patients who underwent MRD at our center between January 2011 and January 2012. Abnormal descent, rectoceles, rectorectal intussusceptions, enteroceles, and spastic perineum were observed in a large number of these patients, usually in various combinations. We discuss the technique, its advantages and limitations, and the normal findings and various pathologies. Key words: Chronic constipation; magnetic resonance defecography; obstructed defecation syndrome; pelvic floor Introduction bleeding after defecation, and a sense of incomplete fecal evacuation.[4] Patients may also resort to digital rectal Constipation has a high prevalence in the general evacuation. Evaluation and treatment of these patients has population and is a cause for significant morbidity. It been difficult. Magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) has been estimated that approximately 10% of the Indian has been shown to demonstrate the structural abnormalities population suffers from constipation.[1] Chronic constipation associated with ODS, and patients with significant structural leads to approximately 2.5 million visits to the physicians abnormalities may benefit from surgical interventions like in the United States annually.[2] Various definitions have stapled transanal resection of rectum (STARR). -
Defecography by Digital Radiography: Experience in Clinical Practice* Defecografia Por Radiologia Digital: Experiência Na Prática Clínica
Gonçalves ANSOriginal et al. / Defecography Article in clinical practice Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice* Defecografia por radiologia digital: experiência na prática clínica Amanda Nogueira de Sá Gonçalves1, Marco Aurélio Sousa Sala1, Rodrigo Ciotola Bruno2, José Alberto Cunha Xavier3, João Mauricio Canavezi Indiani1, Marcelo Fontalvo Martin1, Paulo Maurício Chagas Bruno2, Marcelo Souto Nacif4 Gonçalves ANS, Sala MAS, Bruno RC, Xavier JAC, Indiani JMC, Martin MF, Bruno PMC, Nacif MS. Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice. Radiol Bras. 2016 Nov/Dez;49(6):376–381. Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January 2012 and February 2014. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. They were stratified by age, and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All possible quantitative defecography variables were evaluated, including rectal evacuation, perineal descent, and measures of the anal canal. Results: The majority (95%) of the patients were female. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 82 years (mean age, 52 ± 13 years): 10 patients were under 40 years of age; 18 were between 40 and 60 years of age; and 11 were over 60 years of age. All 39 of the patients evaluated had abnormal radiological findings. The most prevalent diagnoses were rectocele (in 77%) and enterocele (in 38%). Less prevalent diagnoses were vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse, and Meckel’s diverticulum (in 2%, for all). -
Role of Conventional Radiology and Mri Defecography of Pelvic Floor
Reginelli et al. BMC Surgery 2013, 13(Suppl 2):S53 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/13/S2/S53 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Role of conventional radiology and MRi defecography of pelvic floor hernias Alfonso Reginelli1*, Graziella Di Grezia1, Gianluca Gatta1, Francesca Iacobellis1, Claudia Rossi1, Melchiore Giganti2, Francesco Coppolino3, Luca Brunese4 From 26th National Congress of the Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery Naples, Italy. 19-22 June 2013 Abstract Background: Purpose of the study is to define the role of conventional radiology and MRI in the evaluation of pelvic floor hernias in female pelvic floor disorders. Methods: A MEDLINE and PubMed search was performed for journals before March 2013 with MeSH major terms ‘MR Defecography’ and ‘pelvic floor hernias’. Results: The prevalence of pelvic floor hernias at conventional radiology was higher if compared with that at MRI. Concerning the hernia content, there were significantly more enteroceles and sigmoidoceles on conventional radiology than on MRI, whereas, in relation to the hernia development modalities, the prevalence of elytroceles, edroceles, and Douglas’ hernias at conventional radiology was significantly higher than that at MRI. Conclusions: MRI shows lower sensitivity than conventional radiology in the detection of pelvic floor hernias development. The less-invasive MRI may have a role in a better evaluation of the entire pelvic anatomy and pelvic organ interaction especially in patients with multicompartmental defects, planned for surgery. Introduction the pelvic examination alone has led to the need to use Pelvic floor disorders represent a significant cause of more direct and comprehensive diagnostic methods [3-6]. morbidity and reduction in quality of life that appear to Purposeofthestudyistodefinetheroleofconven- be increasing in frequency during the last few years [1]. -
Omnibus Codes
Medical Coverage Policy Effective Date ............................................. 7/15/2021 Next Review Date ......................................11/15/2021 Coverage Policy Number .................................. 0504 Omnibus Codes Table of Contents Related Coverage Resources Overview .............................................................. 1 Category III Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) Coverage Policy ................................................... 1 codes General Background ............................................ 7 Deep Brain and Motor Cortex and Responsive Services without Food and Drug Cortical Stimulation Administration (FDA) Approval ....................... 7 Electrodiagnostic Testing (EMG/NCV) Cardiovascular ................................................ 7 Serological Testing for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Gastroenterology .......................................... 36 Neurology ...................................................... 61 Obstetrics/Gynecology .................................. 67 Urology .......................................................... 69 Ophthalmology .............................................. 72 Oncology ....................................................... 80 Otolaryngology .............................................. 86 Other ............................................................. 89 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE The following Coverage Policy applies to health benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Certain Cigna Companies and/or lines of business only provide -
Stenosis After Stapled Anopexy: Personal Experience and Literature Review
Research Article Clinics in Surgery Published: 05 Oct, 2018 Stenosis after Stapled Anopexy: Personal Experience and Literature Review Italo Corsale*, Marco Rigutini, Sonia Panicucci, Domenico Frontera and Francesco Mammoliti Department of General Surgery, Surgical Department ASL Toscana Centro, SS. Cosma e Damiano Hospital - Pescia, Italy Abstract Purpose: Post-operative stenosis following SA is a rare complication, however it can be strongly disabling and require further treatments. Objective of the study is to identify risk factors and procedures of treatment of stenosis after Stapled Anopexy. Methods: 237 patients subjected to surgical resection with circular stapler for symptomatic III- IV degree haemorrhoids without obstructed defecation disorders. 225 cases (95%) respected the planned follow-up conduced for one year after surgery. Results: Stenosis was noticed in 23 patients (10.2%), 7 of which (3,1%) complained about “difficult evacuation”. All patients reported symptom atology appearance within 60 days from surgery. Previous rubber band ligation was referred from 7 patients (30,43%) and painful post-operative course (VAS>6) was referred from 11 (47,82%) of the 23 that developed a stenosis. These values appear statistically significant with p<0.05. Previous anal surgery and number of stitches applied during surgical procedure do not appear statistically significant. Symptomatic stenosis was subjected to cycles of outpatient progressive dilatation with remission of troubles in six cases. A woman, did not get any advantage, was been subjected to surgical operation, removing the stapled line and performing a new handmade sutura. Conclusion: The stenosis that complicate Stapled Anopexy are high anal stenosis or low rectal stenosis and they are precocious, reported within 60 days from surgery. -
Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for the Treatment of Rectocele Associated with Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: a Large Series of 262 Consecutive Patients
Techniques in Coloproctology (2019) 23:231–237 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-01944-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Stapled transanal rectal resection for the treatment of rectocele associated with obstructed defecation syndrome: a large series of 262 consecutive patients G. Giarratano1 · C. Toscana1 · E. Toscana1 · M. Shalaby2,3 · P. Sileri3 Received: 26 September 2018 / Accepted: 5 February 2019 / Published online: 16 February 2019 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract Background This study aims to investigate functional results and recurrence rate after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for rectocele associated with obstructive defection syndrome (ODS). Methods A study was conducted on patients with ODS symptoms associated with symptomatic rectocele ≥ 3 cm on dynamic defecography who had STARR at our institution between 01/2007 and 12/2015. Data were prospectively collected and analyzed. ODS was evaluated using the Wexner constipation score. Primary outcomes were functional results, determined by the improvement in 6-month postoperative Wexner constipation score, and 1-year recurrence. Secondary outcomes were operative time, time to return to work, pain intensity measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), patient satisfaction, and overall postoperative morbidity and mortality at 30 days. Results Two-hundred-sixty-two consecutive female patients [median age 54 years (range 20–78)] were enrolled in the study. The median duration of follow-up was 79 months (range 30–138). Sixty (23%) patients experienced postoperative complications, but only 9 patients required reinterventions for surgical hemostasis (n = 7), fecal diversion for anastomotic leakage (n = 1), and recto-vaginal fistula repair (n = 1). Only 1 intraoperative complication (stapler misfire) was reported, and there were no deaths.