DOCSLIB.ORG

American Identity, White Savior Complex, and Pink Policing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Identity, White Savior Complex, and Pink Policing Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Sociology Dissertations Department of Sociology 8-12-2016 Red, White, and Gay?: American Identity, White Savior Complex, and Pink Policing Marik Xavier-Brier Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/sociology_diss Recommended Citation Xavier-Brier, Marik, "Red, White, and Gay?: American Identity, White Savior Complex, and Pink Policing." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2016. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/sociology_diss/87 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Sociology at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RED, WHITE, AND GAY?: AMERICAN IDENTITY, WHITE SAVIOR COMPLEX, AND PINK POLICING by MARIK XAVIER-BRIER Under the Direction of Wendy Simonds, PhD ABSTRACT In this dissertation, I examine the internal divisions in LGBT/Q communities. I illustrate how the notion of a single, unified community is not only fictive, but counter to the goals of liberation. Utilizing critical discourse analysis, I examine cultural artifacts of the contemporary gay rights movement to determine who has the power to shape domestic and international gay rights discourse. I analyze the role of gay citizenship through the same-sex marriage debates, the creation of the homonational soldier, and how gay rights is employed in international conflicts to strategically promote some countries as progressive, while denouncing others as backwards. I argue that the gay rights movement does not address the needs of all members of LGBT/Q communities, but rather, focuses on the wants of the elite and privileged. Despite recent advances, the gay rights movement has been stunted by a limited and marginalizing focus on normalization. Lastly, I present a queer perspective on gay rights and reimagine a movement that is more courageous and inclusive. INDEX WORDS: Homonormativity, Queer, LGBT Rights, Homonationalism, Sexual Citizenship RED, WHITE, AND GAY?: AMERICAN IDENTITY, WHITE SAVIOR COMPLEX, AND PINK POLICING by MARIK XAVIER-BRIER A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2016 Copyright by Marik Xavier-Brier 2016 RED, WHITE, AND GAY?: AMERICAN IDENTITY, WHITE SAVIOR COMPLEX, AND PINK POLICING by MARIK XAVIER-BRIER Committee Chair: Wendy Simonds Committee: Rosalind Chou Maura Ryan Electronic Version Approved: Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University August 2016 iv DEDICATION To all the queers who live boldly, beautifully and unapologetically. And for those whose lives have been cut too short. Let’s recreate the world together. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation has been a labor of love and could have never been completed without the support and encouragement by such amazing and brilliant people. First, I would like to extend my extreme thanks and unwavering respect for my chair, Dr. Wendy Simonds. Wendy’s critical eye has pushed my writing to a new level and helped shaped this project that began as a collection of nebulous ideas into a finished product that I am truly proud of. Her steadfast confidence in me during graduate school is something that I will always be thankful for. I am indebted to Dr. Maura Ryan who welcomed me as a colleague and friend. Our many conversations about queer politics and our shared frustrations with the inequities in society have shaped me into a better scholar and a more impassioned activist. I am grateful for her fierceness, her femme politics, and her ability to offer insightful questions. I am also extremely appreciative of Dr. Rosalind Chou for her intellectual insights and unwavering support in me and this project. Her warm professionalism and shared hope of rethinking a queer future helped imagine this project and what lies beyond it. Of course I could not have achieved this much without the love and support of my family. First to my closest and dearest friend, Ignatious, who has tirelessly listened to my many ramblings, lovingly criticized and workshopped my ideas, and who has been my anchor through everything. You have been there throughout the emotional journey that is graduate school and I can never explain how much your support and encouragement has meant to me. To my loving parents who have encouraged my dreams, even if not always fully understanding them, I am sincerely and eternally grateful for your love and support. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... ix 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Irreconcilable Differences ................................................................................ 2 1.2 Key Concepts ..................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Homonormativity ........................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Neoliberalism ................................................................................................. 6 1.2.3 Neocolonialism ............................................................................................... 7 1.2.4 Homonationalism ........................................................................................... 8 1.3 A Theoretical Map .......................................................................................... 10 1.4 (Re)thinking Community ............................................................................... 12 1.4.1 The Issue with “We” .................................................................................... 14 1.5 Data Collection and Methods ......................................................................... 21 1.6 Layout of the dissertation ............................................................................... 28 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE LGBT/Q RIGHTS MOVEMENT ..................... 31 2.1 The Split ........................................................................................................... 34 2.1.1 AIDS Crisis ................................................................................................... 39 2.2 Current LGBT/Q politics ............................................................................... 42 3 GOING TO THE CHAPEL: GAY RIGHTS GETS HITCHED........................ 48 vii 3.1 Context of the Gay Marriage Debate ............................................................ 50 3.1.1 Proposition 8 ................................................................................................ 56 3.2 Gay Marriage Enters the Culture Wars ....................................................... 74 3.3 Gay Rights as Cultural Capital ..................................................................... 82 3.3.1 Capitalism and Gay Rights .......................................................................... 91 3.3.2 Gay Rights and Symbolism ........................................................................ 101 3.4 Marriage is a Conservative Value ............................................................... 108 4 GAYS GO TO WAR AND THE CREATION OF THE HOMONATIONAL SOLIDER ................................................................................................................................. 117 4.1 History of Gays in the Military .................................................................... 118 4.1.1 Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell ................................................................................. 121 4.1.2 After DADT ................................................................................................ 127 4.2 Stand and Deliver .......................................................................................... 136 4.3 Homonational Soldiers ................................................................................. 143 5 HOMO-COLLUSION AND THE LOVE AFFAIR WITH THE STATE ....... 149 5.1 American Exceptionalism ............................................................................ 150 5.1.1 United Nations Declaration ....................................................................... 156 5.2 Sexual Exceptionalism .................................................................................. 164 5.2.1 War on Terror ............................................................................................ 165 5.3 White Savior Industrial Complex................................................................ 174 viii 5.3.1 Sochi ........................................................................................................... 175 5.3.2 Uganda ....................................................................................................... 183 5.4 Pinkwashing................................................................................................... 199 6 QUEER (RE)IMAGININGS................................................................................ 209 6.1 What Bodies Belong? .................................................................................... 212 6.1.1 Bringing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • By Anne-Sophie Adelys
    by Anne-Sophie Adelys © Anne-Sophie Adelys - 2013 - www.adelys.co.nz © Anne-Sophie Adelys - 2013 - www.adelys.co.nz 3 © Anne-Sophie Adelys - 2013 - www.adelys.co.nz © Anne-Sophie Adelys - 2013 - www.adelys.co.nz My name is Anne-Sophie Adelys. I’m French and have been living in New Zealand since 2001. I’m an artist. A painter. Each week I check “The Big idea” website for any open call for artists. On Saturday the 29th of June 2013, I answered an artist call titled: “Artist for a fringe campaign on Porn” posted by the organisation: The Porn Project. This diary documents the process of my work around this project. I’m not a writer and English is not even my first language. Far from a paper, this diary only serves one purpose: documenting my process while working on ‘The Porn Project’. Note: I have asked my friend Becky to proof-read the diary to make sure my ‘FrenchGlish’ is not too distracting for English readers. But her response was “your FrenchGlish is damn cute”. So I assume she has left it as is… © Anne-Sophie Adelys - 2013 - www.adelys.co.nz 4 4 © Anne-Sophie Adelys - 2013 - www.adelys.co.nz The artist call as per The Big Idea post (http://www.thebigidea.co.nz) Artists for a fringe campaign on porn 28 June 2013 Organisation/person name: The Porn Project Work type: Casual Work classification: OTHER Job description: The Porn Project A Fringe Art Campaign Tāmaki Makaurau/Auckland, Aotearoa/New Zealand August, 2013 In 2012, Pornography in the Public Eye was launched by people at the University of Auckland to explore issues in relation to pornography through research, art and community-based action.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Right to Life Scorecard – Pro-Life Legislation Votes 2011 Tennessee Senate 107Th General Assembly
    PO Box 110765 Nashville, TN 37222-0765 Ph 615.298.5433 [email protected] Facebook.com/groups/tnrtl/ www.tnrtl.org Twitter.com/tnrighttolife Tennessee Right to Life Scorecard – Pro-Life Legislation Votes 2011 Tennessee Senate 107th General Assembly 1. Senate Floor Vote on SB0424/HB0438 (Ban on Webcam/Telemedicine Abortions), May 19, 2011. (Passed 29-1) 2. Senate Floor Vote on HB0498/SB0633 (Expansion of Unborn Victim of Violence Act to include unborn children prior to viability as victims of assault or homicide), May 21, 2011. (Passed 26–0) 3. Senate Floor Vote to remove pro-abortion amendment #1 by Senator Herron to SJR127, April 18, 2011. (Passed 21-11) 4. Senate Floor Vote to remove pro-abortion amendment #2 by Senator Herron to SJR127, April 18, 2011. (Passed 22-10) 5. Senate Floor Vote on SJR127 (Pro-life constitutional amendment, 3rd and final reading), April 18, 2011. (Passed 24-8) Senator 1 2 3 4 5 X O Score Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey (R-Blountville) X X X X X 5 0 100% Tim Barnes (D-Clarksville) A X O O O 1 3 25% Mae Beavers (R-Mount Juliet) X X X X X 5 0 100% Mike Bell (R-Riceville) X X X X X 5 0 100% Andy Berke (D-Chattanooga) A A O O O 0 3 0% Charlotte Burks (D-Monterey) X X O O X 3 2 60% Stacey Campfield (R-Knoxville) X X X X X 5 0 100% Rusty Crowe (R-Johnson City) X X X X X 5 0 100% Mike Faulk (R-Kingsport) X X X X X 5 0 100% Lowe Finney (D-Jackson) X X O X X 4 1 80% Ophelia Ford (D-Memphis) X X O O O 2 5 40% Dolores Gresham (R-Somerville) X X X X X 5 0 100% Thelma Harper (D-Nashville) X X O O O 2 3 40% Joe Haynes (D-Nashville) X A
    [Show full text]
  • Mhysa Or Monster: Masculinization, Mimicry, and the White Savior in a Song of Ice and Fire
    Mhysa or Monster: Masculinization, Mimicry, and the White Savior in A Song of Ice and Fire by Rachel Hartnett A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL August 2016 Copyright 2016 by Rachel Hartnett ii Acknowledgements Foremost, I wish to express my heartfelt gratitude to my advisor Dr. Elizabeth Swanstrom for her motivation, support, and knowledge. Besides encouraging me to pursue graduate school, she has been a pillar of support both intellectually and emotionally throughout all of my studies. I could never fully express my appreciation, but I owe her my eternal gratitude and couldn’t have asked for a better advisor and mentor. I also would like to thank the rest of my thesis committee: Dr. Eric Berlatsky and Dr. Carol McGuirk, for their inspiration, insightful comments, and willingness to edit my work. I also thank all of my fellow English graduate students at FAU, but in particular: Jenn Murray and Advitiya Sachdev, for the motivating discussions, the all-nighters before paper deadlines, and all the fun we have had in these few years. I’m also sincerely grateful for my long-time personal friends, Courtney McArthur and Phyllis Klarmann, who put up with my rants, listened to sections of my thesis over and over again, and helped me survive through the entire process. Their emotional support and mental care helped me stay focused on my graduate study despite numerous setbacks. Last but not the least, I would like to express my heart-felt gratitude to my sisters, Kelly and Jamie, and my mother.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the March for Life's Background Paper on the History of Planned
    Planned Parenthood Under Fire The nation’s largest abortion provider faces its worst crisis ever By Jeanne Mancini Summary: Whatever your view of abortion, it’s hard not to be appalled by the recent undercover videos of Planned Parenthood personnel casually discussing how they can profi t from the body parts it “harvests.” The powerful, politically connected nonprofi t enjoys massive government subsidies, as well as invaluable aid from the mainstream media who help it pretend to be what it is not: a broad-spectrum provider of healthcare. Now it faces efforts to end taxpayer subsidies for its lucrative business. n July 14, 2015, a small nonprofi t organization, the Center for Medical OProgress (CMP), released a video that marked the beginning of a tidal wave of Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards public opposition to the nation’s largest abor- tion provider, Planned Parenthood Federation livers, and brains are being obtained? Is of America. The video was part of a much Planned Parenthood unlawfully altering October 2015 bigger, broader three-year undercover “sting” abortion procedures to obtain intact baby parts or whole babies? Is Planned Parenthood project detailing a horrifi c reality: Planned CONTENTS Parenthood harvests and sells baby hearts, performing illegal partial-birth abortions to lungs, livers, and brains. At press time, 10 facilitate obtaining those organs? such videos had been released by CMP with Planned Parenthood Under Fire more expected in the weeks ahead. The CMP videos also focus public attention on Planned Parenthood as a government- Page 1 The footage raises a number of critical legal subsidized agency and provide an insightful questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Too Late for Change in the Decision Ross Said Student Input $ and a Vote in $ Needed to Come Earlier in Friday’S Tuition $ Increase Decision
    Serving UNC students and the University community since 1893 Volume 119, Issue 144 dailytarheel.com Thursday, February 2, 2012 Too LaTe for change in the decision Ross said student input $ and a vote in $ needed to come earlier in Friday’s tuition $ increase decision. $$ the tuition process. But Ross said TUITION students have had By Jessica Seaman an opportunity to Staff Writer provide their insight on tuition. “There will be some people on Student protesters, who have both sides that aren’t happy,” Ross opposed tuition increases since said. October, will likely have little He encouraged students to par- influence when the UNC-system ticipate in the tuition discussion Board of Governors votes on by communicating at the campus tuition proposals on Feb. 10. level and by sending emails to At a meeting Wednesday night, members of the board. students pushed UNC-system “I don’t know if it will have a President Thomas Ross for more difference if they vote,” he said. representation at board meetings, “But the board is trying hard to so they can be more active in the make sure students have a voice.” tuition debate. He said students also have a But Ross said it would be diffi- representative on the board to cult to know if students will influ- whom they can relay their con- ence the board’s decision when cerns. they vote in eight days. Atul Bhula, the president Wednesday’s meeting was orga- of the Association of Student nized after student groups emailed Governments, is the sole non-vot- Ross asking to work with him on ing student member of the board.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaders in LGBT Healthcare Equality
    UCLA Arthur Ashe Student Health & Wellness Center A Division of UCLA Student Affairs Geno Mehalik, Outreach Manager [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE UCLA’s Arthur Ashe Student Health & Wellness Center Named “Leader” in HRC Healthcare Equality Index for Third Year The Ashe Center joins only 418 healthcare providers nationwide to earn the “LGBTQ Healthcare Equality Leader” designation UC LOS ANGELES, CA –Apr. 2, 2018 – The Human Rights Campaign Foundation (HRC), the educational arm of the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) civil rights organization, just released the 11th edition of its annual Healthcare Equality Index (HEI), recognizing The UCLA Arthur Ashe Student Health & Wellness Center as a “Leader” in its efforts to serve the UCLA student community for yet another year. The Ashe Center, a division of UCLA Student Affairs devoted to providing quality, accessible, state-of-the-art healthcare and education to support the unique development of UCLA students, received a similar commendation from HRC last year (“Top Performer”). In 2018, however, The Ashe Center rose to the level of “Leader,” improving on its commitment to inclusive healthcare practices, and expanding on its efforts to meet the needs of all LGBTQ UCLA students. This honor is given to facilities that meet LGBT-inclusive benchmarks that are part of the HRC Foundation’s Healthcare Equality Index, a unique survey that encourages equal care for LGBT Americans by evaluating inclusive policies and practices related to LGBT patients, visitors and employees. The Ashe Center earned top marks in meeting non-discrimination and training criteria that demonstrate its commitment to equitable, inclusive care for LGBT patients, and their families, who can face significant challenges in securing the quality health care and respect they deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • July 25, 2014 President Barack Obama the White House 1600
    July 25, 2014 President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: We write to encourage robust civil society participation in the upcoming U.S.- Africa Leaders Summit, and in keeping with the theme of the Summit, “Investing in the Next Generation,” we urge particular attention to the rights and opportunities of the next generation of Africans who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT). Unfortunately, across much of the African continent today, the contributions of LGBT communities are denied or denigrated; their relationships and organizations are criminalized; and hostile political rhetoric seeks to deny their rightful place in African society. In the face of this repression, civil society leaders are standing up and demanding full citizenship. These brave voices are demanding a better future for all citizens of Africa, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, and the Summit provides an unprecedented opportunity to showcase their investments in human dignity. Given how some African governments deny the rights of their LGBT citizens, and the unique role that civil society plays in defending those rights, we urge you to include civil society voices in the official meeting of African leaders during the Summit. We welcome the opportunity for civil society to convene at a forum two days before the leadership meeting, but that forum is not an adequate substitute for civil society participation in the high-level dialogue with heads of state. Recognizing the need for candid discussion at the leadership meeting, we nonetheless believe that civil society participation could be structured to stimulate dialogue without necessarily limiting honest diplomatic exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus Anth 5900.713 Special Problems Queer Anthropology and Activism Spring 2018
    SYLLABUS ANTH 5900.713 SPECIAL PROBLEMS QUEER ANTHROPOLOGY AND ACTIVISM SPRING 2018 Professor: Dr. Jara Carrington Email: [email protected] Voice/Text: 346-201-2888 Office Hours: Tuesdays 2:00-3:30, Thursdays 10:30-12, or by appointment Office: Chilton Hall 308C Class meetings: TBD Course Description: This guided readings course will help you, as an anthropologist, to think more “Queerly” about the construction and reproduction of sexual norms, identities, and subjects in the United States, and to consider how these norms, identities, and subject positions have influenced advocacy efforts for LGBTQ-identified individuals and communities. Like much of cultural anthropology, Queer anthropological theory and practice is by nature interdisciplinary. We will cover influential texts from a range of disciplines to understand how these ideas have helped shape the development and trajectory of queer anthropology. This collection of readings will also highlight the intersections of, and contradictions between, queer theoretical perspectives and ethnography. We will begin by tracing the development of queer anthropology as a subfield of anthropological theory and practice. Readings will elaborate a variety of frames that have been used to study sexuality as an object of analysis, and will reveal influential debates and contentions about its study. Next, we will examine foundational texts that interrogate how sexual norms, identities, and subject positions have been discursively produced in the west. To conclude, we will focus on Queer analyses of activism in the United States to understand how LGBTQ-identified individuals, communities, and activists have worked to navigate, and sometimes contest, processes of state recognition. Course Objectives: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Perspectives of African American Culture and Representation in the Works of Ishmael Reed
    ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVES OF AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURE AND REPRESENTATION IN THE WORKS OF ISHMAEL REED A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of Zo\% The requirements for IMl The Degree Master of Arts In English: Literature by Jason Andrew Jackl San Francisco, California May 2018 Copyright by Jason Andrew Jackl 2018 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Alternative Perspectives o f African American Culture and Representation in the Works o f Ishmael Reed by Jason Andrew Jackl, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in English Literature at San Francisco State University. Geoffrey Grec/C Ph.D. Professor of English Sarita Cannon, Ph.D. Associate Professor of English ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVES OF AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURE AND REPRESENTATION IN THE WORKS OF ISHMAEL REED Jason Andrew JackI San Francisco, California 2018 This thesis demonstrates the ways in which Ishmael Reed proposes incisive countemarratives to the hegemonic master narratives that perpetuate degrading misportrayals of Afro American culture in the historical record and mainstream news and entertainment media of the United States. Many critics and readers have responded reductively to Reed’s work by hastily dismissing his proposals, thereby disallowing thoughtful critical engagement with Reed’s views as put forth in his fiction and non­ fiction writing. The study that follows asserts that Reed’s corpus deserves more thoughtful critical and public recognition than it has received thus far. To that end, I argue that a critical re-exploration of his fiction and non-fiction writing would yield profound contributions to the ongoing national dialogue on race relations in America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big 4'S Full Court Press
    July 31, 2019 www.citizen.org Acknowledgments This report was written by Michael Tanglis, Senior Researcher for Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. The report was edited by Congress Watch Research Director Taylor Lincoln and Congress Watch Deputy Director Susan Harley. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national non-profit organization with more than 500,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research, and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, worker safety, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E Washington, D.C. 20003 P: 202-546-4996 http://www.citizen.org © 2019 Public Citizen. Public Citizen The Big 4’s Full Court Press CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: THE BIG 4 HAVE SPENT $346 MILLION IN LOBBYING & CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS SINCE THE 2010 CYCLE ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 I. THE BIG 4’S POLITICAL SPENDING: $346 MILLION IN LOBBYING & CONTRIBUTIONS SINCE THE 2010 CYCLE, $118 MILLION IN 2018 ALONE ...................................................................................................................................... 10 II. THE FOUNDATION OF THE BIG 4’S POLITICAL
    [Show full text]
  • 38Th UPR WORKING GROUP SESSIONS SOGIESC RECOMMENDATIONS (3 - 14 May 2021)
    38th UPR WORKING GROUP SESSIONS SOGIESC RECOMMENDATIONS (3 - 14 May 2021) This report contains a summary and the SOGIESC recommendations of the 38th UPR Working Group Sessions. The structure of the report includes SOGIESC remarks made by the State under Review, advanced questions from Member States and recommendations of Cycle II and III. The report is based on the draft report submitted by the Working Group and notes taken by ILGA during the Working Group Sessions and drafted by Gabriel Galil (Senior Programme Officer) and Farai Chikwanha (UN Advocacy Intern) For further information on the UPR, please contact: [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS BELGIUM 3 DENMARK 8 ESTONIA 15 LATVIA 22 MOZAMBIQUE 29 NAMIBIA 34 NIGER 42 PALAU 45 PARAGUAY 48 SEYCHELLES 55 SIERRA LEONE 61 SINGAPORE 64 SOLOMON ISLANDS 72 SOMALIA 76 BELGIUM UPR SOGIESC RECOMMENDATIONS DATE AND TIME OF THE REVIEW: 5 MAY 2021, 09:00-12:30 DATE AND TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THE REPORT: 7 MAY 2021, 15:00-1800 During the 38th UPR Working Group Sessions, Belgium received 4 SOGIESC recommendations. It will respond to these recommendations no later than the 48th session of the Human Rights Council. A. SOGIESC Information National Report 31. At all levels of government, Belgium has developed tools to tackle discrimination against LGBTQI+ persons and vulnerable groups more generally. At the regional level, the Flemish Region’s plan of action against discrimination in the workplace focuses on awareness-raising, self-regulation, monitoring and sanctions. Self-regulation has been introduced through sectoral agreements and an action plan providing for “mystery calls” to be made to service-voucher companies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Student's Guide to the Tennessee
    The MembersA of theStudent’s Senate Guide to the Tennessee Senate 2013 Edition Welcome to the Tennessee Senate. Thank you for your interest in your government. My name is Ron Ramsey. I am the Lieutenant Governor of Tennessee. I have this job because a majority of my fellow senators voted for me to be their leader, or “Speaker.” Unlike many other states, Tennessee’s Lieutenant Governor is also head of its Senate. My duties as both Speaker of the Senate and Lieutenant Governor keep me very busy. However, because I am a state Senator, my job is officially part-time. Having a part-time legislature is good because it allows elected officials to spend time living and working under the laws they make and with the people they represent. When the legislature is not in session I run a real estate and auction business with my wife, Sindy, in my hometown of Blountville, which is right on the border between Virginia and Tennessee. It is a wonderful town and I am glad to be able to spend time there when the legislature is not in session. If you visit the Capitol on a day when the legislature is in session, you will see me presiding over the Senate. I have a gavel, and I do my best to keep Senate sessions moving along quickly and efficiently so my members can get back home to their families and businesses. I also make all of the Senate’s committee assignments. Much of the Senate’s work goes on in committees so it is important to have the right people working on the right issues.
    [Show full text]