DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report FY 82 of the Chief of Engineers on Civil Works Activities V PT 0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report FY 82 of the Chief of Engineers on Civil Works Activities V PT 0 INDEX The following abbreviationsare used in the index: LMK VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT NPS SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT LMM MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT NPW WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT LMN NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT ORD OHIO RIVER DIVISION LMS ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT ORH HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT MR+T MISSISSIPPI, RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ORL LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT PROJECT ORN NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT MRK KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT ORP PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT MRO OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT POD PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION NAB BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT SAJ JACKSONVILLE, FLA., DISTRICT NAN NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT SAM MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT NAO NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT SAN CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT NAP PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT SAS SAVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT NCB BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT SAW WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT NCC CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT SPK SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT NCD MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI SPL LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. SPN SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT NCE DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT SWA ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT NCR ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT SWF FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT NCS ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT SWG GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT NED NEW ENGLAND DIVISION SWL LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT NPA ALASKA DISTRICT SWT TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT NPP PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT A Albuquerque Diversion Channels, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-1, 17-9 Alford, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50, 1-58 Aberdeen, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Algoma Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-2, 31-44, 31-70, 31-7-1 Aberdeen Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Alhambra Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Abilene, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Aliso Creek Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-10, 17-12 Allatoona Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-18, 10-27, 10-36 Absecon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Allegany, N.Y. Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) Absecon Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-19, 3-23 26-22, 26-26 Accotink Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Allegany, .N.Y. Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) Ackerman Creek, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-10, 28-13 26-22, 26-26 Adams, Mass. (NAN) 2-33 Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-2, 26-14, 26-17, Adams Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 26-21, 26-26 Adams Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Allegheny River, Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-3, 26-14 Addison, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24 Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-29 Adena, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-23 Allenville, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-21 Adkin Branch, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-22, 6-29 Alley Bay, Beals, Maine (NED) 1-50 Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) Alloway Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 36-13 Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR + T) 42-3 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Alma Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-8 AIWW-Mooring Basins, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Almond Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Almond Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-16, (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 10-27, 10-36, 10-41 Alpena Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Alameda Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Alpine Dam, Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 Alamo Lake, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-21 Alpine, Texas (SWA) 17-13 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (Closed) Basin, Alsea River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 N. Mex. (SWA) 17-13 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga. (SAS) Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal (Great Bridge, Va.) 8-2, 8-11, 8-12 (NAO) 5-21 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-38 Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho (NAS) 38-11, 38-17, 38-23 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-52 I-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Alton, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-2, 15-14, 15-18, Altus Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-13 15-29 Alum Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-2, 25-11, 25-15 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-2, 9-14, 9-29, Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 9-31, 9-35, 9-50 Amazon Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-3, 10-24, 10-29 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, Wash. (NPS) New England Division (NED) 1-3, 1-29, 1-40 38-26 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-2, 11-25, 11-29 American River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-2, 2-20, 2-24 Ames Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-17 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-27 Amesbury, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50, 1-59 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-7 Amite River, La. (MR + T) 42-15 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-23 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-38 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-2, 8-11, 8-12, 8-16 Amite River and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-42 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-5 Amsterdam, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Southwestern Division (SWG) 15-2, 15-14, 15-18, Anacortes Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19 15-29 Anacortes Navigation Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-15 Anacostia River and Flats (NAB) 4-33, 4-39 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-2, 6-20, 6-27 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Aquia Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Navigation Improvements, D.C. and Md. (NAB) 4-36 Aquilla Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-17, 16-21 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Md. (N) 4-36 Ararat River, Surry County, N.C. (SAW) 6-32 Anacostia River Basin, Md. (NAB) 4-39 Arbuckle Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange County, Calif. (SPL) Arcadia, Wis. (NCS) 27-20 33-25 Arcadia Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-2, 31-35, 31-49 Anahuac Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-9 Arcadia Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-18, 19-22 Anchorage Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-1, 40-8, 40-10, Arch Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-57 40-13 Archers Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Ardsley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-11, 2-22, 2-27 Andalusia Harbor, Ill. (NCP) 29-9 Area East of Albany, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Anderson, Ind. (ORL) 24-23 Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-2, 9-29, 9-35, 9-49 Anderson Park, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Argyle, Minn., Middle River (NCS) 27-25 Andover Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-52 Arkabutla Lake, Miss. (MR + T) 42-20, 42-56 Andrews, George W., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Okla. and 10-21, 10-27, 10-36 Tex. (SWT) 19-4, 19-5, 19-17, 19-18, 19-22, 19-24, Andrews River, Mass. (NED) 1-45 19-26 Angler-Use Sites, Meramec Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-14 Arkansas River Basin, Ark. Okla. & Kans. (SWL) (SWT) Annapolis Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 18-2, 18-10, 18-13, 18-15, 18-18, 19-2, 19-23 Ansonia, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-58 Arkansas River, Great Bend, Kans. to Tulsa, Okla. (SWT) Anthony Shoals Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 19-17 Apalachee Bay, Fla. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-32 Arkansas River Project Levees (MR + T) 42-44 Apalachicola Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-2, 10-24, 10-29 Arkansas River Standard Revetments and Dikes (MR + T) Apalachicola Bay to St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 42-37 10-31 Arkansas River Plan, Okla. (SWT) 19-24 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, Ala. Ga. Arkport Dam, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-24 and Fla. (SAM) 10-19, 10-27, 10-36, 10-42 Arlington, Alkali Canyon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Apalachicola River to St. Andrew Bay, Fla. (SAM) Arlington Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 10-31 Armuchee Creek, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Ashland, Ky. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Appelton First Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Ashland Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-2, 31-35, 31-49 Appelton Fourth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Ashley River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Appelton Lower Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-2, 32-18, 32-23 Appelton Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Asotin Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 Appelton Third Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Asotin Dam, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Applegate Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-36, Astoria Turning Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 37-48 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway (MR + T) 42-43, 42-48, Appomattox River, Va. (NAO) 5-22 45-55 Apponaug Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Appoquinimink River, Del. (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-25, 11-29 Aquashicola Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-29 Atchalafaya River Basin, La. (MR + T) 42-5, 42-13, Aquatic Plant Control 42-27, 42-53, 42-55 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-34 Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, La. Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-2, 7-8, 7-10, 7-14 (LMN) 11-38 I-2 INDEX Atchalafaya River, Standard Revetments (MR + T) Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas 42-31 River, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-18 Atchison, Kans.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KR/KL Burbot Conservation Strategy
    January 2005 Citation: KVRI Burbot Committee. 2005. Kootenai River/Kootenay Lake Conservation Strategy. Prepared by the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho with assistance from S. P. Cramer and Associates. 77 pp. plus appendices. Conservation strategies delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and maintain species and populations that have been recognized as imperiled, but not federally listed as threatened or endangered under the US Endangered Species Act. This Strategy resulted from cooperative efforts of U.S. and Canadian Federal, Provincial, and State agencies, Native American Tribes, First Nations, local Elected Officials, Congressional and Governor’s staff, and other important resource stakeholders, including members of the Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative. This Conservation Strategy does not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of all individuals or agencies involved with its formulation. This Conservation Strategy is subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of conservation tasks. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho would like to thank the Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative (KVRI) and the KVRI Burbot Committee for their contributions to this Burbot Conservation Strategy. The Tribe also thanks the Boundary County Historical Society and the residents of Boundary County for providing local historical information provided in Appendix 2. The Tribe also thanks Ray Beamesderfer and Paul Anders of S.P. Cramer and Associates for their assistance in preparing this document. Funding was provided by the Bonneville Power Administration through the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program, and by the Idaho Congressional Delegation through a congressional appropriation administered to the Kootenai Tribe by the Department of Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • The District of Columbia Water Quality Assessment
    THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT 2008 INTEGRATED REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND U.S. CONGRESS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 305(b) AND 303(d) CLEAN WATER ACT (P.L. 97-117) District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division Government of the District of Columbia Adrian M. Fenty, Mayor PREFACE PREFACE The Water Quality Division of the District of Columbia's District Department of the Environment, Natural Resources Administration, prepared this report to satisfy the listing requirements of §303(d) and the reporting requirements of §305(b) of the federal Clean Water Act (P.L. 97-117). This report provides water quality information on the District of Columbia’s surface and ground waters that were assessed during 2008 and updates the water quality information required by law. Various programs in the Natural Resources Administration contributed to this report including the Fisheries and Wildlife Division and the Watershed Protection Division. Questions or comments regarding this report or requests for copies should be forwarded to the address below. The District of Columbia Government District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division 51 N St., NE Washington, D.C. 20002-3323 Attention: N. Shulterbrandt ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................iii LIST OF TABLES...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elko County Nevada Water Resource Management Plan 2017
    Elko County Nevada Water Resource Management Plan 2017 Echo Lake - Ruby Mountains Elko County Board of Commissioners Elko County Natural Resource Management Advisory Commission December 6, 2017 Executive Summary The Elko County Water Resource Management Plan has been prepared to guide the development, management and use of water resources in conjunction with land use management over the next twenty-five (25) years. Use by decision makers of information contained within this plan will help to ensure that the environment of the County is sustained while at the same time enabling the expansion and diversification of the local economy. Implementation of the Elko County Water Resource Management Plan will assist in maintaining the quality of life enjoyed by residents and visitors of Elko County now and in the future. Achievement of goals outlined in the plan will result in water resources found within Elko County being utilized in a manner beneficial to the residents of Elko County and the State of Nevada. The State of Nevada Water Plan represents that Elko County will endure a loss of population and agricultural lands over the next twenty-five years. Land use and development patterns prepared by Elko County do not agree with this estimated substantial loss of population and agricultural lands. The trends show that agricultural uses in Elko County are stable with minimal notable losses each year. Development patterns represent that private lands that are not currently utilized for agricultural are being developed in cooperation and conjunction with agricultural uses. In 2007, Elko County was the largest water user in the State of Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Species Management Plan for the Upper Humboldt River Drainage Basin
    STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN Prepared by John Elliott SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN December 2004 LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN SUBMITTED BY: _______________________________________ __________ John Elliott, Supervising Fisheries Biologist Date Nevada Department of Wildlife, Eastern Region APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ __________ Richard L. Haskins II, Fisheries Bureau Chief Date Nevada Department of Wildlife _______________________________________ __________ Kenneth E. Mayer, Director Date Nevada Department of Wildlife REVIEWED BY: _______________________________________ __________ Robert Williams, Field Supervisor Date Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service _______________________________________ __________ Ron Wenker, State Director Date U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management _______________________________________ __________ Edward C. Monnig, Forest Supervisor Date Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest U.S.D.A. Forest Service TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………..1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………….…2 AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES……………………………………………………………….…4 CURRENT STATUS……………………………………………………………………………..6 RECOVERY OBJECTIVES……………………………………………………………………19 RECOVERY ACTIONS…………………………………………………………………………21 RECOVERY ACTION PRIORITIES BY SUBBASIN………………………………………….33 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE……………………………………………………………..47
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Koocanusa, High Level Assessment of a Proposed
    BGC ENGINEERING INC. AN APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES COMPANY MINISTRY OF ENERGY, MINES AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES LAKE KOOCANUSA HIGH LEVEL ASSESSMENT OF A PROPOSED DAM FINAL DRAFT PROJECT NO.: 0466001 DATE: November 19, 2020 BGC ENGINEERING INC. AN APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES COMPANY Suite 500 - 980 Howe Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 0C8 Telephone (604) 684-5900 Fax (604) 684-5909 November 19, 2020 Project No.: 0466001 Kathy Eichenberger, Executive Director Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources PO Box 9314, Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9N1 Dear Kathy, Re: Lake Koocanusa, High Level Assessment of a Proposed Dam – FINAL DRAFT BGC is pleased to provide the Ministry of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources with the following FINAL DRAFT report. The report details an assessment of a proposed dam on Lake Koocanusa, in southeastern British Columbia. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at 604-629-3850. Yours sincerely, BGC ENGINEERING INC. per: Hamish Weatherly, M.Sc., P.Geo. Principal Hydrologist Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Lake Koocanusa November 19, 2020 High Level Assessment of a Proposed Dam – FINAL DRAFT Project No.: 0466001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Libby Dam is a 129 m high concrete gravity dam located on the Kootenay River near Libby, Montana. The dam was completed in 1973 and was first filled in 1974, inundating the Kootenay River valley to form the 145 km long Koocanusa Reservoir (Lake Koocanusa). Canadian residents and water users are affected by changes in the Libby Dam operations that affect reservoir water levels, as nearly half (70 km) of the reservoir extends into southeastern British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial DNA Analysis of Burbot Stocks in the Kootenai River Basin of British Columbia, Montana, and Idaho
    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:868-874, 1999 © Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1999 Mitochondrial DNA Analysis of Burbot Stocks in the Kootenai River Basin of British Columbia, Montana, and Idaho VAUGHN L. PARAGAMIAN Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 2750 Kathleen Avenue, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815, USA MADISON S. POWELL* AND JOYCE C. FALER Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-2260, USA Abstract.-Differences in mitochondrial haplotype frequency were examined among burbot Lota lota collected from four areas within the Kootenai River Basin of British Columbia, Montana and Idaho. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify three gene regions of the mi- tochondria) genome: NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (ND1), NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2), and NADH dehydrogenase subunits 5 and 6 combined (ND5,6). Amplified DNA was screened for restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs). Simple haplotypes resulting from RFLPs in a single gene region were combined into composite haplotypes. The distribution of composite haplotypes and their frequencies correspond to areas of the Kootenay River basin above and below a presumptive geographic barrier, Kootenai Falls, Montana, and suggest spatially seg- regated populations. A test of geographic heterogeneity among haplotype frequency distributions was highly significant (P < 0.001) when a Monte Carlo simulation was used to approximate a X2 test. Two populations, one above and one below Kootenai Falls emerged when a neighbor-joining method was used to infer a phylogenetic tree based on estimates of nucleotide divergence between all pairs of sample locations. These analyses indicate that burbot below Kootenai Falls form a separate genetic group from burbot above the falls and further suggests that Libby Dam, which created Lake Koocanusa, is not an effective barrier segregating burbot above Kootenai Falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Basins Information
    A p p e n d i x A - B a s i n 54 Crescent Valley Page 1 of 6 Basin 54 - Crescent Valley Crescent Valley is a semi-closed basin that is bounded on the west by the Shoshone Range, on the east by the Cortez Mountains, on the south by the Toiyabe Range, and on the north by the Dry Hills. The drainage basin is about 45 miles long, 20 miles wide, and includes an area of approximately 750 square miles. Water enters the basin primarily as precipitation and is discharged primarily through evaporation and transpiration. Relatively small quantities of water enter the basin as surface flow and ground water underflow from the adjacent Carico Lake Valley at Rocky Pass, where Cooks Creek enters the southwestern end of Crescent Valley. Ground water generally flows northeasterly along the axis of the basin. The natural flow of ground water from Crescent Valley discharges into the Humboldt River between Rose Ranch and Beowawe. It is estimated that the average annual net discharge rate is approximately 700 to 750 acre-feet annually. Many of the streams which drain snowmelt of rainfall from the mountains surrounding Crescent Valley do not reach the dry lake beds on the Valley floor: instead, they branch into smaller channels that eventually run dry. Runoff from Crescent Valley does not reach Humboldt River with the exception of Coyote Creek, an intermittent stream that flows north from the Malpais to the Humboldt River and several small ephemeral streams that flow north from the Dry Hills. Surface flow in the Carico Lake Valley coalesces into Cooks Creek, which enters Crescent Valley through Rocky Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Koocanusa Official Community Plan Bylaw No
    LAKE KOOCANUSA OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN BYLAW NO. 2432, 2013 CONSOLIDATION This is a consolidation of the Lake Koocanusa Official Community Plan and adopted bylaw amendments. The amendments have been combined with the original Bylaw for convenience only. This consolidation is not a legal document. October 30, 2020 Lake Koocanusa Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2432, 2013 This is a consolidation of the Official Community Plan. This consolidated version is for convenience only and has no legal sanction. April 5, 2013 Lake Koocanusa Official Community Plan Endorsement Regional District of East Kootenay “Rob Gay” April 5, 2013 Rob Gay, Board Chair Date “Heath Slee” April 5, 2013 Heath Slee, Electoral Area B Director Date Ktunaxa Nation Council “Ray Warden” March 28, 2013 Ray Warden, Director of Ktunaxa Lands and Resources Agency Date Forest, Lands and Natural Resources Operations “Tony Wideski” March 15, 2013 Tony Wideski, Regional Executive Director – Kootenay Date BYLAW AMENDMENTS Bylaw Amend / Adopted Short Citing Legal / Zone Yr 2539 01/2014 Oct. 3/14 Medical Marihuana Text Amendment /RDEK 2771 02/2017 Aug. 4/17 Koocanusa West / Designation of Part of Wentzell Lot 1, DL 11493, Plan 16032 RR to CR 2921 03/2019 Jun. 7/19 Sweetwater / KV Part of Lot 2, DL Properties Inc. 10348, KD, Plan EPP14443 C to R-SF 2973 04/2019 Jul. 3/20 Sweetwater / KV Part of Lot 2, DL Properties Inc. 10348, KD, Plan EPP14443 C to R-SF REGIONAL DISTRICT OF EAST KOOTENAY BYLAW NO. 2432 A bylaw to adopt an Official Community Plan for the Lake Koocanusa area. WHEREAS the Board of the Regional District of East Kootenay deems it necessary to adopt an official community plan in order to ensure orderly development of the Lake Koocanusa area; NOW THEREFORE, the Board of the Regional District of East Kootenay, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: Title 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The District of Columbia Water Quality Assessment
    THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT 2012 INTEGRATED REPORT TO THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND CONGRESS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 305(b) AND 303(d) CLEAN WATER ACT (P.L. 97-117) District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division i PREFACE The Water Quality Division of the District of Columbia's District Department of the Environment, Natural Resources Administration, prepared this report to satisfy the listing requirements of §303(d) and the reporting requirements of §305(b) of the federal Clean Water Act (P.L. 97-117). The report provides water quality information on the District of Columbia’s surface and ground waters that were assessed during 2010-2011 and updates the water quality information required by law. Various programs in the Natural Resources Administration contributed to this report including the Fisheries and Wildlife Division, the Stormwater Management Division, and the Watershed Protection Division. The Lead and Healthy Housing Division, Environmental Protection Administration also contributed to this report. Questions or comments regarding this report should be forwarded to the address below. The District of Columbia Government District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division 1200 First Street, NE 5th Floor Washington, D.C. 20002 Attention: N. Shulterbrandt ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Treaty History and 2014/2024 Review
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Bonneville Power Administration Columbia River Treaty History and 2014/2024 Review 1 he Columbia River Treaty History of the Treaty T between the United States and The Columbia River, the fourth largest river on the continent as measured by average annual fl ow, Canada has served as a model of generates more power than any other river in North America. While its headwaters originate in British international cooperation since 1964, Columbia, only about 15 percent of the 259,500 square miles of the Columbia River Basin is actually bringing signifi cant fl ood control and located in Canada. Yet the Canadian waters account for about 38 percent of the average annual volume, power generation benefi ts to both and up to 50 percent of the peak fl ood waters, that fl ow by The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River countries. Either Canada or the United between Oregon and Washington. In the 1940s, offi cials from the United States and States can terminate most of the Canada began a long process to seek a joint solution to the fl ooding caused by the unregulated Columbia provisions of the Treaty any time on or River and to the postwar demand for greater energy resources. That effort culminated in the Columbia River after Sept.16, 2024, with a minimum Treaty, an international agreement between Canada and the United States for the cooperative development 10 years’ written advance notice. The of water resources regulation in the upper Columbia River U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning Man Geology Black Rock Desert.Pdf
    GEOLOGY OF THE BLACK ROCK DESERT By Cathy Busby Professor of Geology University of California Santa Barbara http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/busby BURNING MAN EARTH GUARDIANS PAVILION 2012 LEAVE NO TRACE Please come find me and Iʼll give you a personal tour of the posters! You are here! In one of the most amazing geologic wonderlands in the world! Fantastic rock exposure, spectacular geomorphic features, and a long history, including: 1. PreCambrian loss of our Australian neighbors by continental rifting, * 2. Paleozoic accretion of island volcanic chains like Japan (twice!), 3. Mesozoic compression and emplacement of a batholith, 4. Cenozoic stretching and volcanism, plus a mantle plume torching the base of the continent! Let’s start with what you can see on the playa and from the playa: the Neogene to Recent geology, which is the past ~23 million years (= Ma). Note: Recent = past 15,000 years http://www.terragalleria.com Then we’ll “build” the terrane you are standing on, beginning with a BILLION years ago, moving through the Paleozoic (old life, ~540-253 Ma), Mesozoic (age of dinosaurs, ~253-65 Ma)) and Cenozoic (age of mammals, ~65 -0 Ma). Neogene to Recent geology Black Rock Playa extends 100 miles, from Gerlach to the Jackson Mountains. The Black Rock Desert is divided into two arms by the Black Rock Range, and covers 1,000 square miles. Empire (south of Gerlach)has the U.S. Gypsum mine and drywall factory (brand name “Sheetrock”), and thereʼs an opal mine at base of Calico Mtns. Neogene to Recent geology BRP = The largest playa in North America “Playa” = a flat-bottomed depression, usually a dry lake bed 3,500ʼ asl in SW, 4,000ʼ asl in N Land speed record: 1997 - supersonic car, 766 MPH Runoff mainly from the Quinn River, which heads in Oregon ~150 miles north.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series Report 20
    - STATE OF NEVADA ~~~..._.....,.,.~.:RVA=rl~ AND NA.I...U~ a:~~::~...... _ __,_ Carson City_ GROUND-WATER RESOURCES-RECONNAISSANCE SERIES REPORT 20 GROUND- WATER APPRAISAL OF THE BLACK ROCK DESERT AREA NORTHWESTERN NEVADA By WILLIAM C. SINCLAIR Geologist Price $1.00 PLEASE DO NOT REMO V~ f ROM T. ':'I S OFFICE ;:: '· '. ~- GROUND-WATER RESOURCES--RECONNAISSANCE SERIES .... Report 20 =· ... GROUND-WATER APPRAISAL OF THE BLACK ROCK OESER T AREA NORTHWESTERN NEVADA by William C. Sinclair Geologist ~··· ··. Prepared cooperatively by the Geological SUrvey, U. S. Department of Interior October, 1963 FOREWORD This reconnaissance apprais;;l of the ground~water resources of the Black Rock Desert area in northwestern Nevada is the ZOth in this series of reports. Under this program, which was initiated following legislative action • in 1960, reports on the ground-water resources of some 23 Nevada valleys have been made. The present report, entitled, "Ground-Water Appraisal of the Black Rock Desert Area, Northwe$tern Nevada", was prepared by William C. Sinclair, Geologist, U. s. Geological Survey. The Black Rock Desert area, as defined in this report, differs some~ what from the valleys discussed in previous reports. The area is very large with some 9 tributary basins adjoining the extensive playa of Black Rock Desert. The estimated combined annual recharge of all the tributary basins amounts to nearly 44,000 acre-feet, but recovery of much of this total may be difficult. Water which enters into the ground water under the central playa probably will be of poor quality for irrigation. The development of good produci1>g wells in the old lake sediments underlying the central playa appears doubtful.
    [Show full text]