ODHA

Aiitnath Hi-Tech Builders Pvt.Ltd.

Date: 16.01.2018

To, Member Secretary, Infrastructure and Miscellaneous proiects & CRZ Indira Paryavaran Bhavan Jor Bagh Road, New Delhi - 110 003

Sub: Environmental clearance for proposed Integrated Residential rownship proiect at Village Anjur, Mankoli & Surai Tal: Bhiwandi, Dist: Thane, Maharashtra Maharashtra. ltA/MH/MtS/67177 /ZO7Z; F. No. 2L_ 772/2077-tA-ilt)

Reft 1. Minutes of 25ttr EAC (lnfra-ll) meeting held on 30.11.2017 (ltem no. 25.3.72)

Respected Sir,

We are very much thankful to Expert Appraisal Committee (lnfra_2J for appraising our above referred project in its 25rh Meeting held on 30.11.2017 (ltem no. 25.03.2012). Ours is an affordable housing project, which generates significant employment (direct and indirect) and contributes meaningfully to economic prime ,Housing development and the Minister,s vision of for All, by 2022. We request the Hon'ble Committee to consider our below mentioned submissions in light of this context.

per As the provisions ofsection I (vJ of EIA Notification 2006, which states that:

"8, Grant or Rejection of Prior Environmental Clearance (EC):

(r) Clearances from other reguratory bodies or authorities sha not be required prior to receipt of applications for prior environmental clearance of projec* or activities, or screening, or scoping, or approisal, or decision by the regulatory authority concerned, unless any of these is sequentially dependent on such clearance either due to o requirement of law, or for necessory technical reasons,,

Iodhe Develop66: Lodha b(celus, N MJoshiMarg. Mahalaxmi. Mumbai 4oo 011 . tndia.I -912267737373.F +91 22 23@ 0693 Lodhe Ooyelopers 3 y ,UU. UK Lld.: St James's Square London SWt UK. T +44 m 7004 0SOO. F +44 m 704 O9O1 www.lodhagroup.com The aforesaid regulation makes it clear that such prior clearances from other regulatory bodies cannot be insisted upon prior to appraisal or decision on any application for prior environment clearance and if the same are necessary, the same may be put in as CS (condition subsequentJ / future compliances. Further, it may also be noted that since several ofthese conditions have never been put in as condition precedent for any prior EC (including those granted by this tnecessary CommitteeJ, it can be deduced that such conditions are not teahnical reason'.

In view ofthe our compliances, aforesaid regulation and impact on national economic development, we request your good self to consider our point wise compliance positively and grant us prior environment clearance at the earliest.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully, FORAJITHNATH HI.TECH BUILDERS PVT LTD, ^"-'' ['{-,-xrfi Autffrised Signatory

Enclosure:

As mentioned above

POINTWISE COMPLIANCE TO QUERIES RAISED DURING

25th EAC (Infra-II) MEETING

Point No. i: Certificate from the forest department that the project does not infringe any migratory routes of wild animals.

Compliance: The project Site is located at 8.2 km from Sanjay Gandhi national Park and 10.4 km from Tungareshwar Wild life Sanctuary. As per ESZ Notification of SGNP Borivali vide letter no. S.O.3645 (A) dt 05.12.2012, the site is not within 100 m to 4000 m of ESZ of SGNP. The project does not infringe any migratory routes of wild animals. However, we have applied to the concerned authority to clarify that our project is not within the migratory routes of wild animals; copy of application is attached hereto as Annexure I.

Point No. ii: Replies to the comments received from the conservation Action Trust or any other complainant.

Compliance: The reply to the comments received from the Conservation Action Trust is attached as Annexure II and handed over to the Member Secretary of EAC on the 29th Nov 2017.

Point No. iii: The Air Quality Index shall be calculated for base level air quality

Compliance: The Air Quality Index of project site and Surrounding Area are as follows

Sr. No Location AQI 1 Project Site 68 2 Mankoli 77 3 Surai 69 4 Anjurdive 73 5 Sarang 72

Good Minimal Impact Poor Breathing discomfort to people on prolonged exposure (0–50) (201–300) Satisfactory Minor breathing discomfort to sensitive people Very Poor Respiratory illness to the people on prolonged exposure (51–100) (301–400) Moderate Breathing discomfort to the people with lung, Severe Respiratory effects even on healthy people (101–200) heart disease, children and older adults (>401)

Point No. iv: A detailed report on Compliance to ECBC norms

Compliance: A detailed report on Compliance to ECBC norms is attached as Annexure III.

Point No. v: A certificate from the local body supplying water, specifying the total annual water availability with the local authority, the quantity of water already committed the quantity of water allotted to the project under consideration and the balance water available. This should be specified separately for ground water and surface water sources, ensuring that there is no impact on other users

Compliance: We have an in principal approval from STEM for supply of 7.7 MLD fresh water vide letter dated 20/05/2017, the same is attached herewith as Annexure IV, however we have further applied to STEM requesting additional details of total annual water availability with STEM, the quantity of water already committed, the quantity of water allocated to the project under consideration and the balance water available, copy of application is attached hereto as Annexure V.

Point No. vi: A detailed traffic management and traffic decongestion plan to ensure that the current level of service of the roads within a 05 kms radius of the project is maintained and improved upon after the implementation of the project. This plan should be based on cumulative impact of all development and increased habitation being carried out or proposed to be carried out by the project or other agencies in this 05 Kms radius of the site in different scenarios of space and time and the traffic management plan shall be duly validated and certified by the State Urban Development Department and the P.W.D. and shall also have their consent to the implementation of components of the plan which involve the participation of these departments

Compliance:

This project has been granted location clearance by the Urban Development department. While granting such clearance, the Urban development department has taken into cognizance various factors, including traffic impact. A copy of the said location clearance is enclosed herewith as Annexure-VI.

Further, we have carried out the detailed traffic studies from a reputed institution and the same is presented before the committee taking into consideration the present traffic details and after commissioning of the project. The detailed traffic management is attached as Annexure-VII.

Our proposed development is located in the outskirts of MMR and there is no traffic congestion issue in the area. However, we note that it is not possible for us to have knowledge of ‘all development and increased habitation being carried out or proposed to be carried out by the project or other agencies in this 05 Kms radius of the site in different scenarios of space and time’ and hence, we submit that our traffic impact study be based on the impact of our development.

Point No. vii: The permission of the CGWA for abstraction of ground water and for basement/excavation dewatering.

Compliance: The project doesn’t have basement. In view of the above permission of CGWA is not required. We also submit that the ground water table is at 9 m+ below ground level (copy of soil investigation reported is enclosed as Annexure-VIII) and hence, there is no risk of ground water / ground water contamination in this case.

Point No. viii: A certificate of adequacy of available power from the agency supplying power to the project along with the load allowed for the project

Compliance: Consent letter with load allowed for the project dated 27/10/2016 along with the certificate of adequacy of available power dated 11/01/2018 from M/s Torrent Power is attached herewith as Annexure-IX.

Point No. ix: A certificate from the competent authority for discharging treated effluent/ untreated effluents into the Public sewer/ disposal/drainage systems along with the final disposal point

Compliance: We are not discharging any treated effluent into the Public sewer / disposal / drainage system from the project. Significant quantity of recycled water is being used within the project for landscape / flushing etc. Further, all excess effluent is to be used by the local farmers for farming - a letter from Gram Panchayat is attached herewith as Annexure – X.

Point No. x: A certificate from the competent authority handling municipal solid wastes, indicating the existing civic capacities of handling and their adequacy to cater to the M.S.W. generated from project

Compliance: Solid waste generated from entire Complex will be 43.34 Tonnes/day. Out of which 26.0 Tonnes/day will be biodegradable Component and 17.34 Tonnes/day will be non-biodegradable waste. The biodegradable waste will be used in Bio-methanation plant. The recyclable material like plastic, metals, paper etc. will be separated and given to recycle vendors. The remaining inert from solid waste will be handed over to local body, as per the letter dated 16/01/2018, attached herewith as Annexure – XI. We submit that certificate from competent municipal authority may be made as condition subsequent to this prior EC since municipal authority can only grant the same at the time of operationalization.

Ann-xur. - a

()(r

!&/S. A]ITNAIH HI-IE

To, The Dy. Conrervator of Forest, Marathon Circle, LB5

Sub: Proposed lntegrated Township Project at Village Anjur, Surai & Mankoli. Tal. Bhiwandi, Dist. Thane.

Ref: MOM of the 25th Expert Appraijal Committee, ltem NO. 25.3.12

Respected 5ar,

We had applied for Environmental Clearance for our above mentioned project and the hearin8 of the same was held in the 25rh m€eting of the EAC. fu per the MOM (attached herewith) we ere suppose to get a certitication from the forest department that the proiect does not infringe any migratory routes ol wild animals

Attached please find the following :

a) Location plan of our proiect (Marked on Goo8le) b) Layout plan of our project.

Our proiect is part of the sanctloned development plan of the Bhiwandi Surrounding Notified Area. Hence we hereby request you to give us a NOC/cenlfication that our project does not infringe any migratory routes of wild animals.

Please do the needful and oblige.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully, For AJitna\h Hi-Tech builders Pvt. ltd.

Encl : r{s above l: .^ w -,,t' -r LL' Aon.-+a^-lJ LODHA =

Ajitnath Hi-Tech Builders Pvt.Ltd.

30th November 2017 To, The Hon'ble Chairman and Members, Expert Appraisal Committee (lnfra 2 Projects), lndira Paryavaran Bhavan, New Delhi - 110003

Ref: i. ltem No. 25.3.12 at EAC meeting on 29.LL.L7 ii. Letter received by Hon'ble Committee members from one Conservation Action Trust (CAT) on/around 4 pm on 28.11.17

Dear Sirs,

At the hearing for our proposal, we were informed about a letter received from one Conservation Action Trust (CAT) on 28.11.17. We are given to understand thatthe said CAT writes letters opposing almost all proposals in the MMR region, except for the proposals of select developers. The ,easons behind this are apparent and understandable. A brief review of the contents of the letter shows that the CAT has no understanding, context or relationship with our proposed affordable housing township and its sole intent is to raise frivolous objections so as to delay the environmental clearance for us and help its'friendly developers'. We hope that the committee willtake serious action against such elements who are nothing but roadblocks to the Hon'ble Prime Ministe/s vision of 'Housing for All'.

ln any event, our point wise reply to their allegations is as follows:

L. Public heoring is not opplicable for this cotegory of projects.

2. We hove complied to oll ToR prescribed by MoEF & CC.

3. This project doesn't foll within the wildlife corridor.

4. We hove exdmined the some ond our proiect is NOT folling under CRZ. Loyout superimposed on the CRZ mop is enclosed os Annexure A.

Lodha Dev.fopsE: Lodha 6(celus N M Joshr Marg. Mahalaxm , M rmbai 400 01 1 .lndta.I -91 22 61131313. F +91 22 23@ 0693 Lodha Dovelopors UX Lld.:3 Sr Jamess Square LondonSWlY{tJ. UK. T +442070040900. F- +442070040901 www-lodha9roup.com LODHA

5. Attoched for reference to point # 4.

6. Reply - tn the instont case, these opprovols ore not opplicoble to us.

7 . There ore no diversions of streoms or woter bodies.

8. The lond within the proiect boundories doesn't fall within the Privote Forest.

9. As below:

a. lt is complete in oll ospect ond oll the mops olong with relevont infrostructure ore provided.

b, Detoiled mop atong with distonce is provided in EIA report ond copy is ottoched.

c. Yes.

d, Yes, but no port of our proiect site is falling under the CRZ oreo os per the opproved CZMP ond the ECO sensitive zone of the Notionol Pork dnd Tu ngo reshw ar w i ld life So nctu o ry.

e. The proiect boundory is there in the figure, it is not visible due to light colour tone.

f.They ore not reodoble due to the scole of the mop os it is to be provided for o rodius of 10 km distonce os per the EIA guidelines. Detoiled boundories hove been presented in other mops submitted

g. As per tonduse clossificotion we hove provided mongrove clossificotion ond vegetation in dilferent colour.

h. EIA Report wos prepored toking into considerotion of the IUCN list'

i. ln the proiect site, there is record of the Migrotory birds'

23OO m93 Lodha Devetop€rs: Lodha Excelus, N M Joshi Marg. Mahalaxm. Murrbai40o 011. lndia.T +91 22 6773 7373 ' F +91 22 +44 7m4 mo1 www lodhag.oup.com Lodha Devolop.rs uK Ltd.: 3 St Jarnes s Square, London SwlY 4JU JK'T +44 20 7m4 0900 ' F m LODHA

i.oursisooffordoblehousingproject&wearetreotingallwostewotertothe stondords stipuloted by the MoEF & re-used for gordening, flushing & HVAC perthe moke up ond remoining sholt be dischorged inthe receiving wotets os MPCB guidetines. Hence, there sholl not be ony percolotion of woste into the ground woter ond hence there is no impoct on groundwoter'

k. The distonce of the Protected oreos ore more thon I km for ond 'GNP obove 10 KM for Tungoreshwor WLS ond in between there ore vorious urbon settlementslikeThonecityondBhiwandicitythusthereisnoimpoctofthe proiect octivity on these 2 protected oreos'

ro. All the detoils ore Provided.

is 77. The plon showing the trees present on the site dnd to be cut ottoched

!2. Plon ottoched.

plonting ony of \3. Compensotory offorestotion is not oppticoble in this cose' we ore not the invosive ond exotic sqecies.

14.ThestudyiscorriedoutospeltheguidelinesprescribedintheElANotificotion2006 ond os per the ToR gronted.

L5. Study is corried out os per the opplicoble guidelines'

75. Not dppticoble as per the EIA Notificotion'

WerequestyoutotakestrictactionagainstsuchVestedinterestsandensurethattheydo not cause to national loss to help preferred developers'

Thanking you, Yours Truly, Yi,i{' fi\\'{.' J# (Authorized Signatory)

Encl: As above

. Lodha Devotopers: Lodha Eicelus, N M Joshi Marg Mahalaxmi Mu ntral 4oo ol t hdra . T +91 22 6773 7373 F +91 22 23m 0693 www lodhagroup.com Lodha D€v.lopors Ul( Lld.: 3 Sl James's Square London SwlY 4JU, UK 'T +44 20 7004 0900 ' F +44 20 7m4 0901 'fll A nnc*,otn -

ENERGV PERFORMANCE ANALVsIs

Ajitnath Hi- Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd.

Bhivandi Thane Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Table of Contents

1.1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION: ...... 2 1.2 INTRODUCTION TO ECBC COMPLIANCE for residential Buildings: ...... 2 1.3 BASECASE DESCRIPTION: ...... 3 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF DESIGN CASE: ...... 5 3.0 METHODOLOGY ...... 6 4.0 Climate Analysis ...... 7 5.0 Heat Island Effect ...... 8 5.1 Impacts of Heat Island Effect: ...... 9 5.2 Measures to reduce Heat Island Effect: ...... 9 6.0 Daylight Analysis ...... 12 7.0 Ventilation Analysis ...... 15 8.0 Energy Performance Analysis: ...... 17 8.1 Base case: ECBC 2007 Residential Buildings ...... 25 8.2 Base case: ECBC 2007 School Building ...... 28 8.3 Base case: ECBC 2007 Commercial Building ...... 31 9.0 Conclusion ...... 34 Definitions and Abbreviations ...... 36

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 1 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

1.1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION:

This report has been prepared for proposed project by Ajitnath Hi‐Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. located at Bhiwandi, Thane. The figure 1 below shows the location of the proposed project.

Figure 1: Location of the project

The project is with different components, LIG, EWS, Residential Buildings, Commercial / Warehouse and other amenity places. Total construction area of the project is 1166466.16m² out of which 9,69,865 is proposed for residential development, 1,77,600.20 m² is proposed for commercial development and 19,000 is proposed for School buildings. All residential buildings are entirely naturally ventilated and 24 hour functional building of typical residential use. Since the location of the project is in Bhiwandi Thane, the project shall fall under Warm and Humid Climate. The average WWR of the building is around 21%.

1.2 INTRODUCTION TO ECBC COMPLIANCE FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS: The purpose of Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC) is to provide minimum requirements for energy efficient design and construction of buildings and their systems. ECBC is first step towards promoting energy efficiency in the building sector. The code is applicable to buildings or building complexes that have a connected load of 100 kW or greater or a contract demand of 120 kVa or greater. This report shall however focus on Envelope measures for ECBC

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 2 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Compliance. The Building envelope refers to the exterior façade, and is comprised of opaque components (roof, wall, slab, basement, opaque doors, etc.) and fenestration systems (window, skylights, ventilators, etc.) Envelope design strongly affects the visual and thermal comfort of the occupants as well as energy consumption of the building. This considers the heat transfer in the building occurring through the envelope via Radiation, Convection and Conduction.

1.3 BASECASE DESCRIPTION:

For envelope components, ECBC sets requirements for roof, opaque walls; fenestration and skylights. The Baseline specifications to be considered for ECBC for envelope of the building shall be as follows: 1. Roof

Table 1. Showing Baseline Roof Assembly U‐factor and R‐ value Requirement

Climate 24 hour use building Daytime use buildings other Zone hospitals, Hotels, Call centres building types etc Maximum U Minimum R Maximum U Minimum R factor of the value of factor of the value of overall assembly insulation overall insulation (W/m2 K) alone assembly alone (m2 K/W) (W/m2 K) (m2 K/W) Composite 0.261 3.5 0.409 2.1 Hot and Dry 0.261 3.5 0.409 2.1 Warm and 0.261 3.5 0.409 2.1 humid Moderate 0.261 2.1 0.409 2.1 Cold 0.261 3.5 0.409 2.1 (Source: Table 4.1, Pg. 7, Roof assembly –factor and Insulation R – value Requirements, Energy Conservation Building Code, 2007)

Table 2. Showing Baseline Roof Assembly U‐factor Requirement

Composite Hot and Warm & Temperate Cold Dry Humid All building 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.28 types except Schools 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.33 <10,000 m2 Hospitality 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 >10,000 m2 AGA

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 3 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

(Source: Table 4.4, Pg. 22, Roof assembly – Roof Assembly U‐factor (W/m2.K) Requirements for ECBC Compliant Building ECBC 2017

2. Opaque Walls

Table 3. Showing Baseline Wall Assembly U‐factor and R‐value Requirements

Climate hospitals, Hotels, Call centres Daytime use buildings other Zone etc building types (24 hrs) Maximum U Minimum R Maximum U Minimum R factor of the value of factor of the value of Wall assembly insulation wall assembly insulation (W/m2 K) alone (W/m2 K) alone (m2 K/W) (m2 K/W) Composite 0.440 2.10 0.440 2.1 Hot and Dry 0.440 2.10 0.440 2.1 Warm and 0.440 2.10 0.440 2.1 humid Moderate 0.440 2.10 0.440 2.1 Cold 0.0369 2.20 0.352 2.35 (Source: Table 4.2, Pg. 8, Wall assembly –factor and Insulation R – value Requirements, Energy Conservation Building Code, 2007)

Table 4. Showing Baseline Wall Assembly u‐factor Requirements for ECBC compliance

Composite Hot and Warm & Temperate Cold Dry Humid All building 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.55 0.34 types except No star hotel < 10,000 m2 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.40 AGA Business < 10,000 m2 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.40 AGA School < 10000 m2 0.85 0.85 0.85 1 0.40 AGA (Source: Table 4.7, Pg. 23, Opaque Assembly Maximum U‐factor (W/m2.K) Requirements, Energy Conservation Building Code, 2017)

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 4 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

3. Vertical Fenestration

Table 5. Showing Baseline Vertical Fenestration U‐Factor and SHGC Requirements

WWR < 40% 40% < WWR <60 % Climate Maximum U Maximum SHGC Maximum SHGC factor Composite 3.30 0.25 0.20 Hot and Dry 3.30 0.25 0.20 Warm and 3.30 0.25 0.20 humid Moderate 6.90 0.40 0.30 Cold 3.30 0.51 0.51 (Source: Table 4.3Pg. 8, Vertical Fenestration U‐factor and SHGC Requirements Energy Conservation Building Code, 2007)

Table 6. Showing Baseline Vertical Fenestration U‐Factor and SHGC Requirements

Composite Hot and Warm & Temperate Cold Dry Humid Maximum U factor 3 3 3.00 3.00 3 (W/m2.K) Maximum SHGC non 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.62 North Maximum SHGC north 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.62 for latitude >/ 150 N Maximum SHGC north 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.62 for latitude < 150 N (Source: Table 4.10 Pg. 24, Vertical Fenestration Assembly U‐factor and SHGC Requirements for ECBC Buildings, 2017)

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF DESIGN CASE:  The proposed design has the same building floor area, gross wall area and gross roof area as the base building. The occupancy for both the cases has been maintained at 24 hr functional and their respective values are taken.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 5 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

 The u‐value for each envelope component in base case is has been derived from the values prescribed by ECBC as listed in Table 1 & 2. The proposed design case u‐values have been calculated from the assembly as per design.  The SHGC value for each window component for base case has been derived from the values prescribed by ECBC as listed in Table 3. The proposed design case SHGC has been mentioned.

3.0 METHODOLOGY

The objective of this report is to analyses annual energy consumption and to proposed Energy Conservation Measured (EMS) guided as per Energy Conservation Building Codes (ECBC 2007 & ECBC 2017) in order to reduce energy consumption and to achieve thermal comfort of occupant.

Figure 2 Methodology

In order to analyze performance of proposed design, analysis was performed considering Climate, Orientation of building, Site Context, Building Material, Daylight & Natural Ventilation, Fenestration and Thermal Comfort of the occupant. The Energy conservation measures were applied on proposed design such as on building envelope, usage of artificial lighting, Electrical appliances used in the project and HVAC System proposed for project in order to reduce

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 6 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

annual energy usage. Annual energy usage was derived by performing hourly simulations by various analysis tools and energy conservation measure was derived against the ECBC mandated baseline.

4.0 Climate Analysis

Project site is located at Bhiwandi, Thane. The proposed project comes under Warm and Humid Climatic Zone as per ECBC 2007 & ECBC 2017 Climate zone map of India

Figure 3: Climate zone of proposed project

Climate Zone Map of India, Source: ECBC 2017

The figure 4 below shows Dry Bulb temperature, Relative Humidity and Wind flow for the Thane city. It is observed that for maximum months dry bulb temperature of Thane is in the range of 27 ° C to 38 ° C . In the months of winter minimum dry bulb temperature observed was in the range of 21° C to 27° C. The

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 7 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

maximum relative humidity observed was 70% and minimum was 30%. The prominent wind direction observed was West and maximum wind flow observed was 6m/s to 2m/S.

Through the climate analysis it is observed that Natural ventilation and use of shading devices are the effective strategies for the climate in Thane city to achieve thermal comfort for the occupant.

Figure 4 Weather Parameters of Thane City

5.0 Heat Island Effect

As urban areas develop, changes occur in their landscape. Buildings, roads, and other infrastructure replace open land and vegetation. Surfaces that were once permeable and moist become impermeable and dry. These changes cause urban regions to become warmer than their rural surroundings, forming an "island" of higher temperatures in the landscape. Heat islands occur on the surface and in the atmosphere. On a hot, sunny summer day, the sun can heat dry, exposed urban surfaces, such as roofs and pavement, to higher temperatures, hotter than the air, while shaded or moist surfaces remain close to air temperatures.

The following figure shows the distribution of the heat as per different kinds of areas like rural, urban, commercial etc.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 8 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Figure 5 Diagrammatic Representation of Heat island effect

5.1 Impacts of Heat Island Effect:

Following are the impacts caused by Heat Island Effect:

 Local Climate change  Higher ambient temperature  Increase in Energy Consumption  Air Pollution  Affected thermal comfort and well‐being of community.

5.2 Measures to reduce Heat Island Effect:

Landscape and Vegetation: Planting trees and Covering exposed surface by Grid Pavers: vegetation lowers surface and air temperatures by Solar absorption and radiation from exposed providing shade and cooling through

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 9 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

site area can be reduced by covering with evapotranspiration and helps to reduce heat Island grid pavers. Effect.

Solar Panel on roof: Roof / terraces of a High Albedo Paint on pathways and roads: building is a permanent source of heat Exposed pathways and roads will be treated absorption and heat transfer. The mounted with the High albedo paint or light colour solar panel will help to reduce incident solar paint in order to reduce solar ingression. ingression and help in reduction of solar absorption.

The image below shows the master layout of proposed project. Measures are taken in order to reduce the heat island effect.

High Albedo Paints on Road:

Proposed internal roads are treated with high albedo paint instead of tar road in order to reduce heat island effect.

Light colour paint on roof and roof mounted solar panel

Terraces are the permeant source of heat transfer and are exposed to sun for maximum duration resulting high solar absorption and reflection. In order to reduce the impact the terraces are treated with light couloir paint and also the mounted solar panels reduce the solar ingression.

Covering exposed Site area by paver Blocks.

The exposed site area such as pathways, walkways is treated with grid paver blocks in order to reduce solar absorption and radiation.

Landscape treatment

The RG areas site boundaries are planted with native trees in order to create shaded area and to reduce solar ingression on the surface

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 10 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Figure 6 Layout of the proposed project

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd.

Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

6.0 Daylight Analysis The purpose of the study is to calculate lux level at the habitable spaces for proposed design.

Analysis Parameters as per ECBC 2017

Climate data file Mumbai ISHRAE Simulation Duration Annually

Simulation hours: 8 hrs – 09:00 to 17:00 hrs IST Total 2,920 hrs Work plane height 800 mm from the finished floor Reflectance Wall 50% values Ceiling 70% Floor 20%

Figure 7 Typical Flat 1: 3 BHK Flat: Type C

Achievable Lux Level : Typical Flat 1: 3 BHK Residential Building

Space Min Max Average Living Room 612 Lux 2067 Lux 612 Lux Bedroom 1 984Lux 2015 Lux 579 Lux Kitchen 227 Lux 617 Lux 318 Lux Bedroom 2 752 Lux 2015 Lux 612Lux Bedroom 3 845 Lux 2145 Lux 652 Lux

Average Lux Level 554 Lux

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 12 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Figure 8 Typical Flat 2: 1 BHK Flat (EWS)

Achievable Lux Level : Typical Flat 2: 1 BHK (EWS) Space Min Max Average Living Room 180 Lux 2025 Lux 354Lux Bedroom 167 Lux 2118 Lux 318 Lux Kitchen 114Lux 2015 Lux 215 Lux

Average Lux Level 296 Lux

Figure 9 Typical Flat 3 : 2 BHK Flat Type A

Lux Level : Typical Flat 2: 2 BHK (Type A) Space Min Max Average Living Room 308 Lux 2154Lux 412 Lux Bedroom 1 327 Lux 2087 Lux 513 Lux

Kitchen 412 Lux 2109 Lux 315 Lux

Bedroom 2 408 Lux 2056 Lux 309 Lux

Average Lux Level 387 Lux

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 13 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Figure 10 Typical Floor Plan : 1st to 2nd Floor Plan

Average Lux Level Achieved: 590 Lux

Figure 11 Typical Floor Plan: Typical Floor Plan

Average Lux Level Achieved: 607 Lux

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 14 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

UDI Calculation:

Sr. Dwelling Unit Average Area Area Area No. Lux below above under UDI 100 Lux 2000 Lux for 90% of time 1 Typical Flat 1‐ 3 554 0% 12% 88% BHK Unit 2 Typical Flat 2‐1 296 0% 8% 92% BHK Unit 3 Typical Flat 3‐2 387 0% 10% 90% BHK Unit 4 School , Typical 1st 590 6 10 84% and 2ND floor plan 5 Commercial 607 4 8 88% Building Typical Floor Plan

7.0 Ventilation Analysis Figure 12: Typical Flat 1: 1BHK Flat: EWS

Minimum Carpet Window Window Actual Operable area Space Floor Area Operable Operable Required IGBC Type Area (m²) Area in m² Area % mandatory (m²) requirement Living Room 2.16 6.6 1.62 24 10 Kitchen 1.35 4.5 1.01 22 8 Bedroom 1.8 7.6 1.35 18 4

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 15 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Figure 13 Typical Flat 2: 2 BHK Flat: Type A

Space Wind Carpet Window Actual Minimum Operable Type ow Floor Operable Operable area Required as Area Area Area in Area % per IGBC (m²) (m²) m² mandatory requirement in (%) Living Room 3.15 13.6 2.36 17 10 Kitchen 1.35 6.4 0.68 11 8 Bedroom 1 2.25 9.2 1.69 18 4 Bedroom 2 2.17 8.8 1.63 18 4

Figure 14 Typical Flat 2: 2 BHK Flat: Type C

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 16 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Minimum Operable area Carpet Window Window Actual Required as per Space Floor Area Openable Openable IGBC Type Area (m²) Area in m² Area % mandatory (m²) requirement in (%) Living 3.6 14.0 2.70 19 10 Room Kitchen 2.25 6.1 1.13 19 8 Bedroom 1 2.25 9.3 1.69 18 4 Bedroom 2 2.25 9.3 1.69 18 4 Bedroom 3 2.25 9.3 1.69 18 4

8.0 Energy Performance Analysis: The energy Performance analysis is carried out by virtual 3D model as per proposed design. The proposed model is divided into several zones considering number of floors and activity of spaces, conditioning and unconditioned spaces, habitable spaces and non‐habitable spaces as per the designing of the project. Building height, Window to wall ratio, proposed building materials and fenestration details were assigned to the virtual 3D model as per the design of the project. Each zone was further assigned with different parameters such as lighting power density, lighting schedules, occupancy pattern, equipment load, and Solar Hot water Usage, HVAC System and schedules. The energy performance analysis of the proposed project is based on the parameters described in ECBC 2007 and ECBC 2017. Two different base cases were considered as per the requirement of ECBC 2007 Baseline and ECBC 2017 baseline. The building was simulated with actual orientation and various energy conservation measures considered in order to reduce energy consumption. The annual energy consumption was analyzed by simulating building with actual orientation as described in ECBC 2007 and 2017.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 17 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Figure 15 Layout of the proposed project

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 18 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Design Parameters

Model Input Baseline Case Baseline Case Proposed Case Parameter (As per ECBC 2007) (As per ECBC 2017)

Design Parameters : Building Envelope 21 % (Residential) 21 % (Residential) 21 % (Residential) WWR 32% (School) 32% (School) 32% (School) 38 % (Commercial) 38 % (Commercial) 38 % (Commercial) Shading effect of solar panel on roof and Shading No shades No shades shading devices on all façade as per design is considered. Exterior Wall Construction 6” Non‐structural RCC wall Residential U‐Value= 0.44 W/m²K U‐Value =0.40 W/m²K U‐Value= 2.27 W/m² K 6” Non‐structural RCC wall School U‐Value= 0.44 W/m²K U‐Value =0.85 W/m²K U‐Value= 2.27 W/m² K 6” Non‐structural RCC wall Commercial U‐Value= 0.44 W/m²K U‐Value =0.40 W/m²K U‐Value= 2.27 W/m² K Roof Construction U‐Value= 0. 409 W/m²K U‐value= 0. 33 W/m²K Residential 6” RCC slab with 4” Brickbat Coba Insulation entirely above deck. Insulation entirely above deck. U‐value = 1.56 W/m²K

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 19 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Model Input Baseline Case Baseline Case Proposed Case Parameter (As per ECBC 2007) (As per ECBC 2017)

U‐Value= 0.409 W/m²K U‐value= 0.47 W/m²K School 6” RCC slab with 4” Brickbat Coba Insulation entirely above deck. Insulation entirely above deck. U‐value = 1.56 W/m²K U‐Value= 0.409 W/m²K U‐value= 0.47 W/m²K Commercial 6” RCC slab with 4” Brickbat Coba Insulation entirely above deck. Insulation entirely above deck. U‐value = 1.56 W/m²K Glazing U Value: 3.3 W/m²K U Value: 3.0 W/m²K U Value : 4.6 W/m²K SHGC (All) : 0.25 SHGC (Non North) : 0.25 SHGC : 0.42

(North) : 0.50 VLT : 45%, Design Parameters :Comfort System and Controls

Proposed residential buildings are designed as a naturally ventilated building. For energy performance analysis all bedrooms and living rooms are considered as a condition spaces. Packaged Single Zone (Split Unit) with COP 3.0 system is considered for energy performance simulations.

Natural Ventilation For all the habitable spaces, windows are designed considering cross ventilation in order to achieve (Residential) maximum wind flow to provide thermal comfort. The operable area of window is more than 20% of floor area of habitable spaces. Sill level of window is designed as per the activates performed in the habitable spaces in order to achieve thermal comfort. Living Room: 3 – 6 ACPH Living Room: 3 – 6 ACPH Living Room: 3 – 6 ACPH ACPH Bedroom : 2 – 4 ACPH Bedroom : 2 – 4 ACPH Bedroom : 2 – 4 ACPH Kitchen: 3 – 6 ACPH Kitchen: 3 – 6 ACPH Kitchen: 3 – 6 ACPH HVAC System Type

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 20 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Model Input Parameter Baseline Case Baseline Case Proposed Case (As per ECBC 2007) (As per ECBC 2017) Packaged Single Zone Packaged Single Zone Packaged Single Zone Residential (Split Unit) with COP 3.0. (Split Unit) with COP 3.0. (Split Unit) with COP 3.0. School AHU System VRV System VRV System

Commercial Building AHU System VRV System Chilled water system

Chiller Parameter (School) Air Cooled Chillers. VRV System Design, COP VRV System Design, COP 4.0 COP 2.9 3.02

Chiller Parameter (Commercial) Water Cooled Centrifugal Water Cooled Centrifugal Water Cooled Centrifugal COP 6.1 Chillers, COP 5.4 Chillers, COP 5.4

VSD’s on Chiller (Commercial) Not Applicable Not Applicable Recommended

Chilled Water Min. Supply 60C, ∆T = ‐110C 60C, ∆T = ‐110C 60C, ∆T = ‐110C Temp (Commercial) VFD’s on Cooling Tower Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable (Commercial) Condenser Water Min. Supply 310C, Approach – 310C, Approach – 310C, Approach – Temp (Commercial) ‐150C ‐150C ‐150C

Primary, Fire, Condenser Standard – 60% Standard – 70% Premium – 75% Pump Class (Commercial & School)

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 21 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Model Input Parameter Baseline Case Baseline Case Proposed Case (As per ECBC 2007) (As per ECBC 2017) Primary, Fire, Condenser Standard – 70% Standard – 70% Premium – 85% Motor Class (Commercial & School) Heat Recovery Wheel Not Required Not Required Not Required (Commercial & School) CO Sensor High efficient CO Sensor at High efficient CO Sensor at No Basement for proposed Project basement basement Service Hot Water 20% on solar 40% on Solar 20 % on solar (Only For residential) Design Parameters :Lighting Controls

Lighting Control at common High efficient Occupancy High efficient Occupancy High efficient Occupancy Sensor, areas Sensor, Space control unit Sensor, Space control unit Space control unit and daylight and daylight Control unit and daylight Control unit Control unit installed at all the installed at all the common installed at all the common common areas. areas. areas.

Exterior Lighting Exterior lighting shall be Exterior lighting shall be Exterior lighting shall be controlled controlled by Photo by Photo Sensor or astronomical controlled by Photo Sensor or astronomical time switch Sensor or astronomical time switch time switch

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 22 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Model Input Parameter Baseline Case Baseline Case Proposed Case (As per ECBC 2007) (As per ECBC 2017)

EXIT Signs Internally illuminated exit Internally illuminated exit Internally illuminated exit sign shall sign shall not exceed 5 Watts sign shall not exceed 5 not exceed 5 Watts per face. per face Watts per face

Interior LPD 7.5 W/m² 7.70 W/m² 5.0 W/ m². Staircase : 5.50 W/ m² Restroom : 7.70 W/ m² Parking Bays : 2.20 W/ m² Seating area , GYM : 4.60 W/ m²

Exterior LPD ‐ Landscape area : 0.5 W/ Landscape area : 0.5 W/ m m² Pedestrian walkways : 2.0 W/m² Pedestrian walkways : 2.0 W/ m²

Luminar Efficiency 0.7 or Above 0.7 or Above 0.7 or Above

Design Parameters : Electrical and Renewable energy system

Transformer : Power transformers of the proper Rating and design must be selected to satisfy the minimum acceptable efficiency at 50% and full load rating. All

measurement losses should be carried out by using calibrated digital meters of class 0.5 or better accuracy.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 23 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Energy Efficient Motor High efficient motors

DG set Minimum 3 Star rating.

Check Metering and Monitoring Check metering and monitoring shall install electrical metering to record

demand energy and total power factor.

Power Factor Correction All 3 phases shall maintain their power factor correction as minimum 0.97at the point of connection.

Power Distribution losses The power cabling shall be sized so that the distribution losses do not exceed than 3%.

Renewable energy Calculations

Maximum Demand load of proposed project 71.89 mW

Installed capacity of Solar PV Panels (1% of Demand 720 kW load)

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 24 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

8.1 Base case: ECBC 2007 Residential Buildings The virtual model has been prepared of the proposed residential building with the help of Energy simulation analysis tool. The Parameters such as Building envelope, Lighting control, Electrical system and controls and comfort system parameters as per ECBC 2007 mandated baseline was applied to proposed design in order to understand the energy consumption as per ECBC 2007 mandated baseline. The weather file of Mumbai (Thane) by ISHRAE has been used for the analysis. The graph below explains the avarage annual energy consumtion as per the ECBC 2007 mandated baseline for proposed project. To genrate the avarage annual base case as per ECBC ‐2007 the project is simulated considering the true north and further rotatind with 90°, 180° and 270°

ENERGY USAGE : BASELINE ‐ ECBC 2007 140000

120000

100000

80000 (MwH)

60000 USAGE

40000 ENRGY

20000

0 Avg Basecase 0° 90° 180° 270° ECBC 2007 SPACE COOL 45530 42825 45482 42612 44112 SERVICE HOT WATER 5,493 5,493 5,493 5,493 5493 MISC. EQUIP 28558 28558 28558 28558 28558 EXT. USAGE 5,167 5,167 5,167 5,167 5167 AREA LIGHTING 30122 30122 30122 30122 30122

The analysis tool helped to understand the annual energy consumption for proposed project. It was analyzed that the average annual energy consumption as per ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 113452 mW. The EPI of base case for ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 116.98 kW / m² / annum. The average annual consumption of the propsed residential project is further analysed based on the usage pattern .such as energy required for Space cooling, Service hot water, Miscellaneous equipment, External usage, and Area Lighting. It was analysed that the Space cooling, Miscellaneous equipment and Area Lightingare the major energy consumtion factors.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 25 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Base case: ECBC 2017 Further to analysis the annual energy consumption as per ECBC 2017 mandated baseline the parameters such as Building envelope, Lighting control, Electrical system and controls and comfort system parameters were revised as per ECBC 2017 mandated baseline

The graph below explains the avarage annual energy consumtion as per the ECBC 2017 mandated baseline for proposed project. To genrate the avarage annual base case as per ECBC ‐2017 the project is simulated considering the true north and further rotatind with 90°, 180° and 270°

The analysis tool helped to understand the annual energy consumption for proposed project. As per the analysis the average annual energy consumption as per ECBC 2017 mandated baseline is 113045 mW. The EPI of base case for ECBC 2017 mandated baseline is 116.56 kW/m²/annum. Proposed case The analysis of ECBC Mandated baseline 2007 and 2017 is useful to understand the Enegy consumption of proposed project. This analysis is also helpful to derive the energy conservation strategies to reduce energy consumption. To minimise the the energy consumption and to derive the energy conservation measures the building orientation, Building Design, Building height Window to wall ratio Window opening positions are kept unchanged. The parameters such as Building envelope material Lighting control, Electrical system and controls

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 26 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

and comfort system, were integrated in order to achive maximum energy consumption.

The graph below explains the average annual energy consumption of proposed case as per the parameters mentioned in Design parameters table

ENERGY USAGE : BASELINE Proposed Case

120000

100000

80000 (MwH)

USAGE 60000 ENRGY

40000

20000

0 ProposedCase SPACE COOL 46318 SERVICE HOT WATER 5493 MISC. EQUIP 28558 EXT. USAGE 4547 AREA LIGHTING 26206

It was analyzed that the average annual energy consumption for proposed case is 111122 mW. The EPI of proposed case is 114.57 kW/m²/annum. . The project is able to save 2330 mW annually with the proposed design strategies and saved 2.05% energy against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline. In the comparision with ECBC 2017 mandated baseline, the project is capable to save 1922 mW annually and saved 1.70% energy. EPI ratio calculated against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 0.979 and against ECBC 2017 is 0.983.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 27 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

8.2 Base case: ECBC 2007 School Building The virtual model has been prepared of the proposed School building with the help of Energy simulation analysis tool. The Parameters such as Building envelope, Lighting control, Electrical system and controls and comfort system parameters as per ECBC 2007 mandated baseline was applied to proposed design in order to understand the energy consumption as per ECBC 2007 mandated baseline. The weather file of Mumbai (Thane) by ISHRAE has been used for the analysis. The Schedule of the building is assigned as per the school schedule. The graph below explains the avarage annual energy consumtion as per the ECBC 2017 mandated baseline for proposed project. To genrate the avarage annual base case as per ECBC ‐2017 the project is simulated considering the true north and further rotatind with 90°, 180° and 270°.

ENERGY USAGE : BASELINE ‐ ECBC 2007 2500

2000

1500 (MwH)

USAGE

1000 ENRGY 500

0 Avg Basecase 0° 90° 180° 270° ECBC 2007 SPACE COOL 911 785 945 769 853 SERVICE HOT WATER 00000 MISC. EQUIP 596 596 596 596 596 EXT. USAGE 108 108 108 108 108 AREA LIGHTING 628 628 628 628 628

The analysis tool helped to understand the annual energy consumption for proposed project. It was analyzed that the average annual energy consumption as per ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 2184 mW. The EPI of base case for ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 114.96 kW / m² / annum. The average annual consumption of the propsed residential project is further analysed based on the usage pattern .such as energy required for Space cooling, Service hot water, Miscellaneous equipment, External usage, and Area Lighting. It was analysed that the Space cooling, Miscellaneous equipment and Area Lightingare the major energy consumtion factors.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 28 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Base case: ECBC 2017 Further to analysis the annual energy consumption as per ECBC 2017 mandated baseline the parameters such as Building envelope, Lighting control, Electrical system and controls and comfort system parameters were revised as per ECBC 2017 mandated baseline

The graph below explains the avarage annual energy consumtion as per the ECBC 2017 mandated baseline for proposed project. To genrate the avarage annual base case as per ECBC ‐2017 the project is simulated considering the true north and further rotatind with 90°, 180° and 270°.

The analysis tool helped to understand the annual energy consumption for proposed project. As per the analysis the average annual energy consumption as per ECBC 2017 mandated baseline is 2199 mW. The EPI of base case for ECBC 2017 mandated baseline is 115.72 kW/m²/annum. Proposed case The analysis of ECBC Mandated baseline 2007 and 2017 is useful to understand the Enegy consumption of proposed project. This analysis is also helpful to derive the energy conservation strategies to reduce energy consumption. To minimise the the energy consumption and to derive the energy conservation measures the School building orientation, Building Design, Building height Window to wall ratio Window opening positions are kept unchanged. The parameters such as Building envelope material Lighting control, Electrical

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 29 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance system and controls and comfort system, were integrated in order to achive maximum energy consumption.

The graph below explains the average annual energy consumption of proposed case as per the parameters mentioned in Design parameters table

It was analyzed that the average annual energy consumption for proposed case is 2149 mW. The EPI of proposed case is 113.12 kW/m²/annum. . The project is able to save 35 mW annually with the proposed design strategies and saved 1.60% energy against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline. In the comparision with ECBC 2017 mandated baseline, the project is capable to save 49 mW annually and saved 2.24% energy. EPI ratio calculated against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 0.984 and against ECBC 2017 is 0.978.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 30 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

8.3 Base case: ECBC 2007 Commercial Building The virtual model has been prepared of the proposed Commercial building with the help of Energy simulation analysis tool. The Parameters such as Building envelope, Lighting control, Electrical system and controls and comfort system parameters as per ECBC 2007 mandated baseline was applied to proposed design in order to understand the energy consumption as per ECBC 2007 mandated baseline. The weather file of Mumbai (Thane) by ISHRAE has been used for the analysis. The Schedule of the building is assigned Considering the building use. The graph below explains the avarage annual energy consumtion as per the ECBC 2017 mandated baseline for proposed project. To genrate the avarage annual base case as per ECBC ‐2017 the project is simulated considering the true north and further rotatind with 90°, 180° and 270°.

The analysis tool helped to understand the annual energy consumption for proposed project. It was analyzed that the average annual energy consumption as per ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 20978 mW. The EPI of base case for ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 118.12 kW / m² / annum. The average annual consumption of the propsed residential project is further analysed based on the usage pattern .such as energy required for Space cooling, Service hot water, Miscellaneous equipment, External usage, and Area Lighting. It was analysed that the Space cooling, Miscellaneous equipment and Area Lightingare the major energy consumtion factors.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 31 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Base case: ECBC 2017 Further to analysis the annual energy consumption as per ECBC 2017 mandated baseline the parameters such as Building envelope, Lighting control, Electrical system and controls and comfort system parameters were revised as per ECBC 2017 mandated baseline

The graph below explains the avarage annual energy consumtion as per the ECBC 2017 mandated baseline for proposed project. To genrate the avarage annual base case as per ECBC ‐2017 the project is simulated considering the true north and further rotatind with 90°, 180° and 270°.

ENERGY USAGE : BASELINE ‐ ECBC 2017 25000

20000

15000 (MwH)

USAGE

10000 ENRGY 5000

0 Avg Basecase 0° 90° 180° 270° ECBC 2017 SPACE COOL 9,321 7,755 9,358 7,720 8539 SERVICE HOT WATER 00000 MISC. EQUIP 5571 5571 5571 5571 5571 EXT. USAGE 1,008 1,008 1,008 1,008 1008 AREA LIGHTING 5994 5994 5994 5994 5994

The analysis tool helped to understand the annual energy consumption for proposed project. As per the analysis the average annual energy consumption as per ECBC 2017 mandated baseline is 21112 mW. The EPI of base case for ECBC 2017 mandated baseline is 118.88 kW/m²/annum. Proposed case The analysis of ECBC Mandated baseline 2007 and 2017 is useful to understand the Enegy consumption of proposed project. This analysis is also helpful to derive the energy conservation strategies to reduce energy consumption. To minimise the the energy consumption and to derive the energy conservation measures the School building orientation, Building Design, Building height Window to wall ratio Window opening positions are kept unchanged. The parameters such as Building envelope material Lighting control, Electrical

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 32 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance system and controls and comfort system, were integrated in order to achive maximum energy consumption.

The graph below explains the average annual energy consumption of proposed case as per the parameters mentioned in Design parameters table.

ENERGY USAGE : BASELINE Proposed Case

25000

20000

(MwH) 15000

USAGE

ENRGY 10000

5000

0 ProposedCase SPACE COOL 9033 SERVICE HOT WATER 0 MISC. EQUIP 5571 EXT. USAGE 907 AREA LIGHTING 5171

It was analyzed that the average annual energy consumption for proposed case is 20683 mW. The EPI of proposed case is 116.46 kW/m²/annum. . The project is able to save 295 mW annually with the proposed design strategies and saved 1.40% energy against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline. In the comparision with ECBC 2017 mandated baseline, the project is capable to save 429 mW annually and saved 2.03% energy. EPI ratio calculated against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 0.984 and against ECBC 2017 is 0.978.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 33 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

9.0 Conclusion The various analysis was performed to analyze the annual energy consumption by proposed project. The Base case as per ECBC 2007 and 2017 was further analyzed in order to achieve minimum energy consumption.by proposed residential project

 Heat Island Effect

In order to reduce the heat island effect various majors are obtained such as High albedo paint on roads, Maximum landscape, Application of light colour paint on terrace and mounted solar panel on terrace. Further it was analyzed that the effective measures such as landscape and vegetation, shaded Pathways, mounted solar panel on terrace, light colour paint or high albedo paint on road and pathways are helpful to reduce the surface absorbed radiation by 57%when compared with base case

 Daylight Analysis

For daylight analysis the typical units were considered and the same were analyzed to calculate the average daylight (Lux levels) and UDI area for proposed project

With the help of simulation it was analyzed that for the typical dwelling unit of 1 BHK the average Lux level observed was 296 lux with the UDI area of 92% ,for the typical dwelling unit of 2 BHK the average Lux level observed was 387lux with the UDI area of 90% .and for the typical dwelling unit of 3 BHK the average Lux level observed was 554 lux with the UDI area of 88% Hence the project satisfy the daylight requirements mention in ECBC 2007, ECBC 2017 and NBC 2016.

 Ventilation analysis

The building is designed considering Natural ventilated building. Maximum Windows are designed considering the cross ventilation and the stilt level of the window is decided as per the activity in the particular room as per ECBC 2017 and NBC 2016 guidelines.

For ventilation analysis the typical units were considered and the same were analyzed to calculate achievable air moment in the habitable spaces. The calculation helped to understand the operable area in the habitable spaces.

Space Type Actual Minimum Operable area Required as Operable per IGBC mandatory requirement in Area % (%) Typical 1 BHK Flat Living Room 24 10

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 34 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Kitchen 22 8 Bedroom 1 18 4 Typical 2 BHK Flat Living Room 17 10 Kitchen 11 8 Bedroom 1 18 4 Bedroom 2 8 4 Typical 2 BHK Flat Living Room 19 10 Kitchen 19 8 Bedroom 1 18 4 Bedroom 2 18 4 Bedroom 3 18 4

With the calculation it was observed that for the habitable spaces the window operable area is above as per the IGBC GH V2 mandated baseline and also fulfil the criteria as per NBC 2016 for natural ventilation.

 Energy Performance Analysis

The project is divided into three parts depending upon the building use. The Residential Development is able to save 2.05 % energy with the proposed design strategies against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline and 1.70% energy against ECBC 2017 mandated baseline. EPI ratio calculated against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 0.979and against ECBC 2017 is 0.983. The School Building is able to able to save 1.60% energy with the proposed design strategies against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline. and 2.24% energy against ECBC 2017 mandated baseline. EPI ratio calculated against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 0.984 and against ECBC 2017 is 0.978. The Commercial Building is able to able to save 1.40% energy with the proposed design strategies against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline and 2.03 % energy against ECBC 2017 mandated baseline. EPI ratio calculated against ECBC 2007 mandated baseline is 0.986 and against ECBC 2017 is 0.980.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 35 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Definitions and Abbreviations Building envelope: Building envelope is the exterior plus the semi‐exterior portions of a building. For the purposes of determining building envelope requirements, the classifications are defined as follows: Building envelope, exterior: the elements of a building that separate conditioned spaces from the exterior Building envelope, semi‐exterior: the elements of a building that separate conditioned space from unconditioned space or that encloses semi‐heated spaces through which thermal energy may be transferred to or from the exterior, or to or from unconditioned spaces, or to or from conditioned spaces.

Fenestration (Horizontal): Horizontal Fenestration is the area under a skylight, monitor, or saw‐tooth configuration with an effective aperture greater than 0.001 (0.1%)..

Fenestration (Vertical): Vertical Fenestration is the floor area adjacent to side apertures (vertical fenestration in walls) with an effective aperture greater than 0.06 (6%).

K‐Value (Thermal Conductivity): The time rate of steady heat flow through a unit area of homogeneous material induced by a unit temperature gradient in a direction perpendicular to that unit area. Units of K are BTU‐in / hr – ft2 – °F.

Projection factor, overhang: PF (overhang) is the ratio of the horizontal depth of the external shading projection divided by the sum of the height of the fenestration and the distance from the top of the fenestration to the bottom of the farthest point of the external shading projection, in consistent units.

Projection factor, side fin: PF (side fin) is the ratio of the horizontal depth of the external shading projection divided by the distance from the window jamb to the farthest point of the external shading projection, in consistent units.

Roof: Roof is the upper portion of the building envelope, including opaque areas and fenestration, that is horizontal or tilted at an angle of less than 60° from horizontal

R‐Value (Thermal Resistance): R‐Value is the reciprocal of the time rate of heat flow through a unit area induced by a unit temperature difference between two defined surfaces of material or construction under steady‐state conditions. Units of R are m2‐ oC/W (h‐ft2‐ oF/Btu). For the prescriptive building envelope option, R‐ Value is for the insulation alone and does not include building materials or air films.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 36 Remediation Technologies ECBC Compliance

Shading Coefficient (SC): SC is the ratio of solar heat gain at normal incidence through glazing to that occurring through 3 mm (1/8 in) thick clear, double‐ strength glass. Shading coefficient, as used herein, does not include interior, exterior, or integral shading devices.

Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC): SHGC is the ratio of the solar heat gain entering the space through the fenestration area to the incident solar radiation, typically ranging from 0.9 to 0.1, where lower values indicate lower solar gain. Solar heat gain includes directly transmitted solar heat and absorbed solar radiation, which is then reradiated, conducted or convected into the space.

U‐Value (Thermal Transmittance): U‐ value is heat transmission in unit time through unit area of a material or construction and the boundary films, induced by unit temperature difference between the environments on each side. Unit of U are W/m2 – oC (Btu/h‐ft2 oF).

Visible Light Transmittance (VLT): VLT is also known as the Visible Transmittance, is an optical property of a light transmitting material (e.g. window glazing, translucent sheet, etc.) that indicates the amount of visible light transmitted of the total incident light.

Wall: Wall is that portion of the building envelope, including opaque area and fenestration that is vertical or tilted at an angle of 60° from horizontal or greater. This includes above and below‐grade walls, between floor spandrels, peripheral edges of floors, and foundation walls.

Window Wall Ratio (WWR): WWR is the ratio of vertical fenestration area to gross exterior wall area. Gross exterior wall area is measured horizontally from the exterior surface; it is measured vertically from the top of the floor to the bottom of the roof.

Ajitnath Hi‐ Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. 37 Ann

@ srem srnrurrrl r\c1 Drte: ?cloS\':Ct?

To. Uls. Aitrath Hi-Tech ljuildcrs l'\r' I td ' 2l6,Shah & Nahar lndustrial Estalc, Dr. E.. Moses Road. Worli' lvtumbai- 400 018.

projecl situdttd a1 Sub: - Supply of ?.? l\lLl) ]r'alcr for slrctir'l torvnship villagt Anjrrr tt llir. Aj$::th lli- l ech lluildcrs ltlt' l'td'

Rcl: - \'our leltcr rlrttJ Oill0,l0l6'

is hereby to Wilh retcrctrc.: lo Jl1;\.c srrbject' thc prineill:.1 appror,al Sranted phascs llom 2017 to 2020 to N{ls' lulfill rh* requirentettt ol \YotL'r supply of 7'7 i\lll) in Ajinalhlli-TechBuil

0----*-- Col. vilclr:r:r:rnrl,X;ti::i|;" n"*''

& Intia' Co' Prt' Ltd" Thane lirr Copy to General Managcr (('iD)' STIINI Natcl l)istr' inlirntration Plcase. AJM?{ATFJ }fl I.TEEH BUILDERS PW.tlID. I 216, Shah& Nahar Industnal Estate, Dr.E.Moses P,oad, Worli. Mumbai 400 018

01.3.10.2015 ;" The lvlanaging Director, Stem water Distrioution and lnfraslructure Co. Pvt,Ltd Tlane Municltal CorBararion's. v a,'.tJt'r^ ^."- (tr,-'rn.-t<,, ) Crnl

Tl^" .,.r- ,.2;, Y\-J-...1 (L k\ - 4cD k\ Dear Sir.

Sub: Remarks for in Principal approval the Waier Suppty Scheme at vi age Anjur. Mankoii & Surai. Taluka Bhiwandi & Dist.Tlrane

S.i.los- 239{pt).253(pti.254(pt),255i 1A, 18.2.3, 256(pt).263(pt),265i2.3,a.(pi}. 266)pt).269/3, 27 o\ptt, 27 1 lpt).27 2

S-Nos. 4116,7,9.1o(pt). 45/3.4.5.7, 4713.4(pt),5 48lll1(pt). 49t1ipt) 5111.2. 52i1 , 53iA.B,C. 5414.5A.58.5C, 55/10.11(pt)'14,15. 56/1(pt).18. 57(pt). 58(pt).60/2. 62, 636511 66!2,3.4. (pt\r. 67/1 1,68i2(pt).cf vil!age Mankoli

S.Nos. 12i1 .3.4.15, 14l5 to 8,1o(pt),1 1 ,12,13(pt',.14. lo 17, 15t3,4,7 .to 9.11.12, 17t1t2,,'tg/1 to 4. 2.1. 22(ptl, ?.3. 24 25t1t2.2, 26l1lpt\, 27t2. 2An 4Gl0 .3411 .z(pt). 35/1(pt),2, 37i3, 39(pt),40/7,8(pt) f viltage Surai Tttane.

Sir.

We are proposing io Cevelop the Special Town Ship on aoove said plot bearing S.Nos as rnentioned above 3t village Aniur. Mankoii & Slrrar. Tatuka Bhiwandi & Dist.Thane which may cornprise approxiniate 16778 tenemenls and may require approximate 7 7 MLD f resh water oer dav

You are requesteC to fumish us the deta;is as what are the present provisions prgvided 3;rC future scherres which w:!l oe implemented by SiEl,, watei Distributron and qfr-- infrastructrre Cc Pvt.Ltd regarajng watet s..igpiy sahemes in ii,:e abcve said area. ,,' \^\ 16{4,lf4{ : .*,,rs ^.,r / . .."\ r_ _ 1,- t .J #-'o'tf- #'.' {. ,{.\-i ^ ..-4^',--/'1t,L l+t' ,'41' making an application' We need -. We will seek the water supply from STEM after confirmation from STEM to provioe the water supply to our proposed Special Township - Project at above said site. This confirmation/conseft is required for our above said sTP pornt of v:ew from the utility.

It is requested to issue us the confirmation letter at ihe earl;est & obliged'

Thanking You,

Yours Faithfully. For AJITNATH Hl-TECH BUILDERS PW LTD.

Authorized Signatory. Encl Location PIan & Water Balance chart c STEM WATER DISTRIBU'I'ION ANI) I:(TRAS II.LCI'UR E COJ\1I'.\\Y I'VT. I-TD. \{inutcs of the 21"rMeeting of Boartl oI Dircctors of S'I EI{ }!ater l)i;lribLrIii n antl l::frastru c ttr r' Cornpany h4. Ltd. held on trVedncsday, 29103i2017 at 12.00 Pm *_ llem No: 16

,9,rrpolv of 7.5 tr{LD water for slecial torgrlq[lp*.nrsise!.-.s!1Lrnl!d---il:.-Yi,U-,Iile-Ani*t"-,r"4 ilX:ff:: rcquirenrent of 0.I05 MLD rvater frrr rnul tip-!!qnros-e h;r Il, -rc!t--!r-o !!:]!-.:r !I.l--(]gsh-a!q .rt Vill:g: Ve\e\e. \o M,s. ,\iitrrath lli-tcch lluildet I'tt. l.(d. \Vs. 'lhe nratter was discussed and it rvas resolvcd as follo\"/s: Qomparri, hcreinaftt "RISOLVED THAT the principal approval bc and is hereby'g:enled lo lr:lfil lhe n,

A*9.= ,Y it t.]i. i: Col. Vivekanand B. Chor.rdhary) ts,rnie$isrr,rl) r,) N{anaging Ilirector Chairn:an Stcm lY.rter l)ist. & Infra. Co. Pvt. Ltd., Thanc Stem Watcr I)ist. & ln[:'.r. Cc. Pvt. Ltd., 'l'h::-: .\4f \ ,,/ -7 D,1

'Jr

Jt

()

l, Annr-<"^ul- -!

L()[)HA = AJIINA,TH HI.TECH BUILDER$ PT/T. LTD.

io. The Managing Clre€lor STEl,,l ',$ater Clstribulon and lntra strli6lu ie Oo. pbt. Ltd., Vardan Commercbl Comptex, 9n fbcr, L,liDC Roao l.lo" 16, W8gale lndusrial Esiate. Thane (YJ) - 400 604_

Sub: ln-principle Approval. granted to supply water !o 0(r proposed lntegrated Township Projecr at vi age Anjur, surai and Mankori raruia Bhiwand Dist. Thane.

Ref: 1i tn-principte approvat graried by STEM dated 20fOSt2O1t (Copy atached) 2) 25!h EAC Minutes of Meeting dated (Coiy atachedt ;\;r Sir.

i7e r.€;itl iike infor.re '|nourd to ycr ihai '4e ia./e appliec icr snvr:-onrnenr Seararae ::cr_. rnvlrrnnrent Dept. for proiect. the above sai,.' Acconlingry a meeting was herd \^,ith EAC ap. !::it ?tota,)t'*as discrssed in deta, in lhe said nreerr,'.,g copy of Minutes oi Meeiin! :s 3ll:,rched hereu,rith for your ready reflrence. As pet lfec-r llo. 2S_3.12 (v), $€ ar€ requ;red ia iLirrrii a :ertitjcate from Local BrCy juopty'ng !,?ter speofyina aoficwing pointsl /\+'tn-*a''- Vi I

I

ctq riq(. qvrsld q {"{t f,T. fi{d*,'H-EToi ad-m i.3rFr;ilt{ Erq}6 M' m'k' qiqr trgrfra qeilfusf, TrR qqr6a q6r{q qTifus. q qrR rqqr qftRfqd qftfi+' sSss i 6f,c xY (r) e{'{i E-{u}qtcn'--

Ir6KrgYIEFr qrnftq,rg faqrtr, {rroq, rff rc. urRn ffiq m.ffiqs-trCy/qti/f.E.Ye/q uf{zt-qR ffii+, - ?c qfiro, ?oq\s'

v6sa ffiq;-ffi vtr{-ds sfiIwlr. Cqlr& q ic-$ rr6:nrE YrFfifqT xP]i{q rrqq-xncfut4s{el.

qa,o- ( cTd-d6r.qii 6"rqRFr

gfr, q. .arq{ q@ qfos,qa{f, BqTrr, i?Tec,lF i? 'ftntr 1. 5Fqq,qqiewl frqFTd'7rm'q,tq{- i 1. ,ran n e1gffi, {q{qffin'!'+irftsrq erftrsrI,siil 1g'4,t"+{-\1 qzrmq'{q-+ Y. w{r{qfuq, fif+{i'r, if sqn{fu-{, {d{T{ 6wzalu* I frum,{'xeu,:ia-{-i1 q-fi' q. fonrfiq en{'ff ,q}sur fr lqrrr' st{q rdt tq* \9. TiqrrE, Tn {ifiI,'ftruq iiq' {d. a. fumrFr"r$,ad. V6{q1r5, qrp TfiI, 6}aEur fu{rtr', E61-6tT ,{qqq$ rN. Gqi-{ fui* oro-qn ti si, +qilqr qftrg+At{ q-flft1r r,tr qomiqT qgrr&qr cfr qytkoTr-qr c'dt wrq+ r{qre-q;, ;trR Tqtt, ai4 vnrar, ft. ard qii-sEq ma wwrid{ tel^ffiSlq$ qn-eT* ulirqqT s"r''r vfl -qlv}frkJ"rlHslls{rfi'.g qfuc'hFrd tniuqrsra}verqT(tEtrAd,l

kalam ?0 lettor

Scanned by CamScanner k'aTUi' .rr-{ra-6', qqiIir4l' alli IIrGi' \o'.^ u6rqqr')*dgrfr'F qa qftqs-ilil-m n-+& or"qia *1, {t-E-d-ql qmtfut.t qr{r: *.4; qdfrql-qr TslvliqT '* q-* 3fimqlftrd s{'e1.sd ek firqrd' qrT ti ws{r6g"fr s-i+r {Tq{ ) ..rr'tqv \\' *ffi.,-- ms*fu {i"'"q' scr-is' 1eE ("i-" trtt qr"qn qA 6i' {rq-d-'il lrr*-6iq' o&qv'* rffirq qfuqErr y{Tqarq{ qffi{0l {Igq{rq .qirr-q-o etqq feqT'fi-q 5reuft+{ q-dnq ** r-a"t q s-S qr frEI'li's, riqre-o irrc€ff, iT"q, 5d' TtH'T{ qtvt {-6lisTm-dr +-r r+*, q'S 1+{ wr+r k-sTq $Rmi"r; eii, g+,"rq;m A# mr, +tqq rr+q q rs6t'{s'{q-55',arn {e=r' aroi vnet, fu' aioiqiqr qa-flqn.) 11. oq qftrsn}, cqfu-rql *rrfr-sm frETrI' rieTmq, {st cei"'fr-*'ewero +d *1, scrE oftrqq-dl frqnrqT ffizsl ,rutqq-tTS.I 11. fir+s-{+fi CsTqrs{qh-t}

Scanned by CamScanner {6ITrqvrRrJT ' ;TrRk*.FTfmTfi Y stt q-qert, {eq scrrir, rlxrelq, ff-xooo??' kria': - ?c qfiro, ?oqs. i!@ s;qi6- :- ft{\'{- t?ty/\t i/r.H'. v 171 xffi-tt, q6 qiil qTqd' filti$ il{qqda qq {rqi-qr GEirS-d firti$ srsl lrTiTEi ctrt qftr{kfr elarsdT gq} wr* 3d€ 't-fi oIftI$R et'" q qrx 31fufr'qe' tSaE qrtftrq. 6-'{o-qrd in€I 3ili;.1 aisrTi q-a-nq mifti+ {+fi eTrt'l q-trs xo t{znw{ gq| q-qr rde's< 3fiIfrqq' 3rsl s-{o-at?T enar i qqfr{ *ta *q*-1sn {IRFI qrr fe-dT"s fr'qT'lr* 3{fugq-{T mqio Efiq€- qrd, (k{i6' t,3 qfua loorg GTAI l?oviio/g.ffi.Rlo/oEffi-q1, k{is t$ loos q-a+rr qkr qfufaqq, rtfr vtrs'-{ {tciqtil?r ftt4 oran td fldfiis crftrfiurFft qqqq gaqa kqr rdo'sm rtlftrfl'r" srsl:F-{sqrd ertfir e{rt'i ffiq Fiqt;rt

qnr+rqqqaFgd*rfienf ; sfii"r qrsrsi, nruni r* eifrrftqqT-qr zn-e"q rq(q) q?if, dr{*"tvr vrr+H {rR fs-flq fq,r.r'r* s{fuqqqT m.fuq}$-trtl^eqsl qrcq q.F.1i\e/Ro11Fh-1f , fus- tVl/1"1\ erq& Tffi "ift{hii ffi 3r{lT afirfi ft6rs qT-{rT 1utga qrsr r*tis 'Tfi fusrs'sl-qtr' *luqlci eni,.l erqr fu-+iq fqdrqfirqcr+dt{r{atar$ e+tt ; qrfri qqql, izri fu-srs qt{qq fr_{rg fi{{q flaqn-dqra q+IftTa. qm eart+* tTqqr+ml qqfr€ sTrt 6ql5*qqr 3-trs .. 36 q-*rfr-g'a ctn ur€rrfrS trrqrq-*' slqt s$rqrf, s{rmt eG,.l; qTfor qrirqT, t qfi{'"irdTq atqf6 &as$ N.fi{. Gqa*qr a-dq,r< er-dqg6q-ft' e{-srs{otd errml aTrb ci* &rlq t'nqsrca s6w ffiRa 6{oqr6-t-dl Gige qT-sT s-d-s'srT }FfiFl" or{II s-{wtrf, erteTinbdHr{Tr-mfif,q{q c-kIrdyrxnrqqK{+cTr srq{, qrq?a q}.si{i qrorsif,} a gd, m.ftd$, fr.drq Y\.oq t.o{R.( qt-{d v.}:sA""frI ",artqtfr3r'qt{ q{ Ailer sl sliTsT GiG qral sds " rqa er-qf#f, e}-*' W1,,5lgrGS sqr+Yr s{rB; sn&r qrcrp.fi, 3"ffi k.fl-s trq eft.{ qrql' rffrql-{fll{ rwerqlqd-mehrkqrsq0{.rd,p-+v}Jr+ei,useilqfumcrt-qfl {-sa, ."iRTu} q fu iqti flqfqq t+qT fr-6r€ d-{il rffi qd eqrfr e ed ; qfrr qerfr, i{sTd{, l'R rqfl, c-dj-itg rq, gri qiivfr {rwFnffid +erid{ ffi snqr++ dt Effi *.mi-d{, rm erdilT t*n-St w

al,v2

Scanned by CamScanner wi /rB-fl .T6rrqn irffi W erzrrrsqm / is oidrii 6wrcr qqm. slvT qfuilqr qffi;iw q( ar adq wd csfri v{ at qr draad fuen;Bqf+enqrci7s. aqaoqr atdf, q wr qffi wadFiw eild mrq +hiq-mrfu?rd vw q&aa sqw6fr7ff ane?qq eqdaT fuqH Ii4rI Yo iqeT +q7 ala etawo ajw qiflqr WfuW +,rc ewatvqfuar n"rrqrdl.

fuqrxaAd sqw ytftie...r-qa7 yqqw yrq oot *aq i vq=ftid fu frs)qa ytfriwons dr{ siq izW wt 6ti ettiqr dniqt eiq;ffiRt da.

ilrsalq Efuit aqtfue wflr.Errni eqrow{ riaiftia rnga s aa fuqTrnqT slrq nfuw-sr*q+ nq qat W i ?ieifrn fuiq ffirfi mfu*ail€ iz{ oii6 W HR( 6aot aqiqn *qq?q aftfi6tr6 tdf,. q1 qqfuW +rF lsw11fqaiqil(ry t;i*? aioe afuTq;an ?fue c,nzqt rqngRqTq qq?qwaTqrqA+ aia"id ersars eMEffiqi+ Mar orq

duqEf qtffiwtd el qafu?d Trrc qslld?crna flffitfdrar€r H:;id dTrC d6 Elq W tffirafu W qtd, cF/n1 dt€@N a7 orarqEiqfd frqli,Wr ercwqq d7 +',lffi atdEr *flii+ wol ernwq urfu e#,?..?ffi aserqwdqf sHT ffiq Mq qTfuwatfi wfufi +rc dwaa?qr W atmssqw inrt fu@ 6qE7. yqtfu{d qmqt c1 rw asrfi sawrqd wtfuv Md aqqr vqqiil t fuqM affiiflfd dsrdil qfrQ+E slt er€-€id. qfrqd rrc-*fo atrsm, ads. orfugfEd Efu$ffi M qffir fuwsrqr dffi qnErc sr'iqffi ls@fi frq4 iltflN a\frr sqrqd fi* q1qrf,q\a dK 3fl=r arens d7q7 {ffi EErqErfr srqtF ilc-d* v6h: ildq qffiar sErr #d al#tno)fu'on;s.ervleizv 7o'dld-' qffd U qld erw QS6 67iqil

q-d,a-fitqr a iaEr"ii sfl& {67-{/yq(sur ilqldr isa@T M dtE alr+f-ar e#rfrqc?-d-d ar4d a fiqc€Err *-rui erral-eE {r*d aoifof aqrrawird-qrai+d+aw@qrsqrfi{rq"rcrqm-d}rr-6-amil <7'sd'r rr6'mY yW fuqwr caar*_q?'yyq 6-67 d sdqir +qdEr +n-+rc+-na?a. ?) n*q vzsrz-i q-d€va AqFT'E eF" vdFrd fryn dM fufun rrata' ar sr#* a vrali q76r7 61.,,1 .rffihT #+r +rf,fR-f rre?-a rrr n-+a drrf+ Baav vlori,? +atd t il6ir.ql xqt atttqrTt ai ET +rar dqir 1rd7. , q'#7fuf-d ?rr{€re-d-qieqq?qd7q?a d@Zsn qrrzE? rm erqhr 6e-dt+ RqEiqrR? ? €E"f+ sqa.*r rroi +rf,+rr+' il*{ snsqqii q-dgc-{I fui?T *aidd erea ora?a ar fi4 ordfl,r #qT +J?6ri-r ilE a.

Scanned by CamScanner r?R :'_yqry dnrdaaq. ffiin ar6fgmr ,6?v *"e" foiv eq6, r6d. T* ,*r* s-$€7-#{rr-{ara pirr *-ca-qy y s*ifr-fd +-R ( ry" daafiarr;r"A*rf- d?-mtJER srrfr fircr Er y€-qpJ il,Rq rd,q? erdq?r m?rqrpiE-dFIEr*r"r+rJ-r-6ffii*;d]r*, dq;f+ ard?d E) q-"rft-fi qrrt a+add?qr Mqdd d?Esbsi{ +r Vern sr.jq?r *q-++ era-*+ rclrqmfl-ff,{ +pi on*r+*- Bq-d_dr r6h. ao{ aaftn Anu fi"),"" q7.B.yof -f r*rfr da-qrssaffi arfu -qrc+aqiqiE-'aqe--*,rrffiq?€r'p-{q,"?Asr",r+ d7 wq7rfr + frF+,"r Eiftlao+ i pinn Commitne,r .) (r4E-IfuS-f fw EmaaTqr W crfl.d a?-6d-{€n 7a" cA3? qrq {d,rrdff{ sc+*_qr m!i-{ riD} E}rq-s7r#. v-d+d "*"* *] eEry-oers.qr*rfuta tw qwtdqr F-,rnilrr,lfqga d"t-di?T€r aia-^.anr oaa fdf{ril€ €ran*-€?-d.aney.q.s- di v-rr*arrsar erdq?T *q-d+ €qnrd ffiy fi eiq-r,rnr+-{u7r+-e rzrr +rri erns?.s. o_dtd: c I s@fud q+;rFq{d ryR q(fi€n se'F/rqtfr'7rt g{d d7:Fraci dsA_d €_€ i.uty enfur qfufs-+ira q-i?-dq.-{.Aqrrd st rsirrs-f, €EErd ^e/? ffis Wrfi mftwvnqe Fi-i -.r7!F s*e3e7 piqr"r-6Tffi *-{oi ord?n +nalqrdqq6,lrtrdTd. ilDfuareri;ietr* .- sc q7. iETqT'Ri,ht 9 o{ vlay ld tz dqen fifr t-d-dr 7s,} s#qr *nq?+?*iftid-**#ffiH*#rwmqiczi a&ryrkao awty:ii#dtr*ql-w?d. ?) qrlqr r+6a fu d*req? wn-q JqETe e-(3a v_*,?_qr Etffi TE/T wtfl adq.a.rs?W dsnqi-qi,rr.dilcid_d v+nla qfqsv fumfi d-o-a anfsn ciil{ 6-{D) eldEr-{ Eiq-d-{.{ Ermirna

qrc ll am qrlfufd sqrdd s-aa-cr a,}ri.da-er +der

oq\q qlaffi ffiE

Scanned by CamScanner srtr16 Y)34i s6@ $ilqr qffiW waft fusqr4 '*Y qffif (ffi lrqftin N sd Er( #4t aftr467@ Tdra' qMdt fuEqqn td t fuqrs qtqq ld/ Yfrtfud'a atqtq @ {rdd@. qqtfuTd sfrtfud 3fi5lv717s7at tizietid 'r1 +t:r Ewfill sdctttd wE+,frf d. Gi 4t 6d ddq satfud s'slfu{d {l{ qwaaht aiat{a +s7, *71fr, ddtq atfrr w qa wtqwrya "'rdr, fuqrsfudtsTMWH orlzlrzt;s t sid{M ql

'fu7'ffi stftifiqn orot atnvqq ua?a. qtqqr q6p1rE( <"ffud or*o errar ?d-d a-fr? atfE{d d,

W qdEr{ Mt *iftid fu6qq {ilq6 dErd6 iq aaT, qiq6e atfttWrsT q?n ord atwqq trale. tq ta naarad sqtfuv diatr-qr affi fuws qlqqr sfrHts€ fiqqryfl{ em*rq ataotrt €7#76 qqffiEt qnai qrtvt 7flFgfur qwa\efiflHdffi ffiqqq67 d'qd{/{' ffi+ e@fiffisd"Aaq+rrwwld lqldf, ewfun €E 3Fi7 H d&''3rcffi fiHnra ki fuil?n-+ afrtw d6n q atflt arqwqffi qM EE-er 3?il-d

Blc?rc 6WH qW 477{'7(6 l( r n' tv) wr az| a pr# -: tl aFisv dflc?qg dqnffi qz?/Prdfqt citT avqn etdd ol&sr+ fu.arrq ra {W}Nzrdhqd. O sffi sqdrsT siqdEqldst ehwfd wtfuFd vqtf,dfu6v

Scanned by CarnScanner iltr {ffIrd !-irflrflTal+ c-{T fiqc df4 mqd wmar+-E-+ daitd sTuqrd'&n-lr Ern-o?i, endv, nsd rrdq?T #dT qrnsj?qt u6to. o1. smq-$-flit qfti\frm qiilar aqfrrm Tt-idiqi',ertq..t-q,, qq qfrlqrd GTrmr +rql, sfi rs-iqr* rq qdhnrnr rsr$ ',q-tq*- e. qn\qirt-qa+s-di errt

o? sm qfifrr$fr rrnqqrt-fr !'-s-flif,+dqfi{+qr nqkm ail&r Efi

qi*t x{rrqr+ Trcqqrit ilTttrr1vm e =TraF+,

arvtoor.

Scanned by CamScanner (YnqislltrsrrT".ft .1*:ffi"*^.8.x?/rx/rfr -rr, fr. lvYlqots stqirE !*e**l

q-siFfrq+sqfq=foqr *frro,- Rtm. IE(t*. ( qt* t- sTF.i 5tl g Itq o.Rll t 1\1 q o.lEQ { ?\Y q o.\oo Y 1\Y g o ?/ o t\Y q o.?Yo q I\Y q o.\1i \e t\\ q,3T o.lio a t\\ lq ".1,Y{ e 1\\ 1 ' o.1?3 \o 1cu, t.ou? lqE o.QcY \R lql o t.qsq (? ?qc 1 t.ol" Lx 1qq, o.l\o 1q\ xq o.lCo \€. lqq o.\s o1 1\s ?qq o.Q\i ,/ ?so q o.Ro\ q ?Q R\s i, o,YQ\ .o.qqq !o ?\aG ,q 1t l\st o o,e\\ q 11 ?uQ g o.Rqo 1{ ?\sl q o.QYC QY ?\e? q t\ 1\s\ o.qo\9 q o.Qoo 1q ?tqE - ' ', I ooo ,;t,. Q\9 R\eq i i' ?c R\sq - g ?3 13S, -3 il

Scanned by CamScanner Io ti1 s l.zqo it iQ/ ? o.qqY T.fi{zidt, fu.arlt +ii?r qiqqfsa qsTlir{-r T'r{ qfir+qraqBro:- i? Y1 o.?\o

Yq U o,(oo tV Yq I o o laU i\ Yl tot o.ql? Y\ ? o.qqY ?\e xq Y a, o.qol Y\ o.\co i3 Yq \e o.\9Zq Yo Y\9 l o. ( F.ro YI Y9 Yq Y? Y\9 ".q31 o. ?qo Yi V' q/(q o. ?Qo YX Y3 sq o.qqo Y\ ( Yq :391 I o-3lq Y\9 \? t o.L?? Y' q? ? o. qi{ Y9 qt 3T qo qt q o.qoo q{ \t s' o.?qi q? qx Y qt o.lqi \Y q3T o.otgo \Y qY \E ' o.oq? qY qs' o.qqo \q q\ (o o.Rlo " q\e lqc o'(Yo 1V qt q\ o.Z\9o l\ .o.\cQo €,o LF 1q o.o\o \q IE qt o.]oo \q (g o.xql

%-

Scanned by CamScanner \\e q qY .-.--.--..\-- o.(oo \\e q q\ o,(o o G --_---1_*--_-q

\c -.---.=% q "1"" / o.qtl q\e \c q F, o.qqq \o R o.XYo q3 qt o o.y\o \90 qi o 1."11 \e \, q\ ? o.qqc \91 EC 1 o.?lq \91 t o ?otq \9Y Eq Y o.loq \e\ q\e \t o.q\e ? \rq \. ?.i o.t?E , ilr.nTq-st,,tq.6rui c?iiir srftr{fufl. \fiTfffi Tr( qfi rf,f,lqtrtdrqfr +qrFcflyro:- \9\9 ta q o.l\tr 1l o ?rn? \9q ({ x o.R\rq 1i qq o.oRo /1 1Y o.oq{ c1, 1Y q o.oql (/{ tx \, o.tol LY qY Z o.tql /lJ 1Y lot o.olq\ a\ qY sq o.olo Z\9 1Y q? o.olo aa qY s?q o.o oZ \ L\ qY I,Y o.oio to TY q\ o.oY o It I,Y o.oao 31 qY q\e o.o!o si qq o.?c1 JY 1q Y o. 1t,o 3\ 1q \9, o.o{o

Scanned by CamScanner \,\ ( o.?o (

3\s ,L 3 o.oEl Q/ 1q 1t o.o!o 33 t\ 1? o o?L loo 1\e t o ?oo qoR q\s i o.oqo qt lei t o.o?o Rol 1R t o.oQo qoY q,s o.o (:o t3 Y o.o19o to'c l( q.qqY 1o \e ?? qq o.olq \"a t? o t.lQo 1"3 ?Y ((o :1I: t\ v? o.q?t ??s 1\ ?q ((( _-E- o.\:\\ tq o.?ll 1?1 ?\s ? t(Y I tc T-ltq ".lqY t1q, I o ?Q,, ?,F iq- o ??fL t(s rq t 3?o ?2 / tq fr- o.aqo (q3 tq ? o-3EQ 1?o iu o. tsl3 g i?t ?c R.ztso 1?e Yo u o.t?o ?ii Yo aq o ?iL g"r iri6d x6-1q.E\Eoil.i-

6iri-6

Scanned by CamScanner GOVDRNMENT OF MAIIARASI,ITRA . Urban Development Department 46 Floor, Main Building, Manrralaya, Mumbai_ 400032. Dated:_ 29s April,2}l7. NOTIFICATION

Maharashtra i.egional antl Torvn planning Act, 1966 No. TPS-1214/5 t3tg.R.42n4t]UD_tz ' Whereas, the Covernment of Maharashtra in Urban Development Deparlment vide is Norification No. TpS. 1206/330 /C.R.230i06ruD-12, datcd l7,h N,larch, 2007 (published in Government Gazette, on 196 April, 200?) promulgated in exercise of its powers conferred by clause (c) under qub section (l) of section 40 of the Maharashtra planning Regional and Town Act, 1966 )hereinafter rcferred to as "the said Act"( appointed Murnbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (l\,lMRDA) to be the Special planning ..the Authority (hereiuafter refened to as said Special planning Authority") for Bhirvandi Sumounding Notified Area, which includes the area of 5l villages (revised 60 villages) from Bhiwandi Tahasil of Thane Districs (hereinafter referred to as '1he said Notified Area");

And rvhereas, the Draft Development plan (hereinafter referred to as "the said Development Plan") of the said Notified Area alongwith with its Development Conrol Regulations has been sanctioned under section 3l(l) ofthe said Act;

And whereas, the Development Control Regulations of the said Development Plan includes the regulation for Development of Integrated Township Project (hereinafter referred to as "the Regulation for Development of Integrated Township Project");

And whereas, IWS Ajitnath Hi-tech Builders Private (hereinafter referred to as "the Applicant Company") have proposal to the Govemment for grant of Locational of an area which includes lands :

Scanned by CamScanner s'irh this (including the lands described in the schedule appended notification) lrom Village. Anjur, i\'Iankoli and Surai' Tal' Bhisandi' Dist. l'hane (hereillafter refened to as "the said Area under Application") for the purpose ol developtnent as "special Tonnship Project" (hereinLfter referred to as "the.said Project");

And ivhereas, as per the said Development Plan, the said area under application in included in Residential zone, Transporl Hub and Logistic Park zone, resen ations and D. P. roads;

And rvhereas, after rnaking necessary enquiries and otler consulting the Director of 'forvn Planning, Maharashtra Srate, Pune, the Governmcnt is of the opinion that the proposal subnritted b1, the Applicant Company, as regards Iands admcasuring approx. 44-99.65 Ha- Are frorn village Anjur, Ir4ankoli and Surai, Tal. Bhirvandi, Disr. Thane, rnore particularly described in "schedule-A" appended to this Notification, is in accordance s,ith the provisions of the Development Control Regulation for lntcgrated Torvnship Project presently applicable to the said Area and hence the said Project can be declared to be an "Integrated Torvnship Ploject" and Locational Clearance under Section a4Q) of the said Act, is required ro be issued subject to tcrms and conditions;

Norv, therefore, rvilhout prejudice to the provisions of the said Act, the Govemment, in exercise of the porvers conlerred under Section 44(2) of the said Act, hereby declares the said Project to be a "lntegrated Torvnship Project", over an area admeasuring approx. 44-99.65 H^-Are. which is more specifichlly described in "Schedule-A" appended hereto, and grants Locational Clearance to the same, subject to the following terms and conditions:

Ternts and Condilions:- D llilh respecl lo orunership / li e of lmd- 1) Ovnership /Developnrent Rights of the said lands must be vtith the Applicant Company and the Applicant Company shall submit registered copy of metnorandum of

Scanned by CamScanner uridertaking, joiht venture, etc. to the concer ed Special Planning Authority bbfore the Letter of Intent 2) It shall be the responsibility of the Applicant Company to procttre the proof of ottnership of the said lands and to submit certilied copies of ownership documents, revenue record and authorised measurement plan, ownership rights, the certified documents of proof of development rights to the concerned Special Planning Authority before the Letter of Intent. 3) The Lands in the said Integrated Township Project, $'hich are parts o/ S. Nos. shall be incorporated in the Master Plan/layout only after the neasurement of the Taluka Inspector of land Records. If strch lands are found not to be cotitiguolts, then sich lands shall be slands automatically excludetl fi'onr this Locarional Clearance and if after exclusion of xrch lands lhe area under the said Integrated Ton'nship Proiect becomes less rhan 40 Ha' Are'' the said . Applicant Cornpany ttill not be entitled for the implententation of the Integated Township Project' the 4) Tie said Applicant Conrpany shall obtained and submit the )1ecessary certificate front the comPetent authority of Forest Departnlent as per the provision of the Special Regtlalion for Development of Integrated Township Project, lo the concerned Special Planning Aulhority

beforevvJv' e the Letter of Intent. necessary s)i) The Applicant Cotnpany . shal.l obtain the and certirtcaft from the co,npeten! authority of the Revenue Forest Department and submit it to the concerned Special Planning Aulhority before Letter of inlent that the lands are included in these "Integrated Township Project not : belongs lo Government /Forest/ Tribal' 6) If the aforesaid Integrated Township Proiect includes, lands which are attracted bY the TenancY and Agricultural tenure, the APPlicant approPriale Procedure entries. After remogal

|. ,i ..:E Scanned by CamScanner Sl,c{'inl I'lorting,\utlttril-r, slmll granl the./inol approval kt th' l.l

Coulsany sltoll rlo ttrc tt.eedfi r"rr;,.;;o ,ni,:,)ouot o1 entries":;i:;;:rr::,,*,1:,",ii,i,,i;"!i;,'J!:;:;,:::,i;,,i;ll* oir'court procactrings ,r"t, or,iit ,ri n,"i orher rands beforc the Letter of lntent. . l0) Tlrc sttirl lpplicant Contpottl, sholl obtained ancl submit the nece ,tr tori4t ,t ,,," ,i),i|,' o"""i!!,',iii, l;:', :i::r,:::;:,:::, rc" Spccial ltcgulotion 7o, onv"topi,,u,,,"ij nuug,o,"a Towtshilt projecr regaxli,g the toni Oearirg S. No. l5/4 ancl 37/2 ofvillage Snrai, Tol. Bhirvatrli, toih" Special Plannirtg "oncerr"d Authoritlt befere rlte Letter of Intent lD lVith rcspect of Ettyironnrunt_ l) It s.hall be bincling on the Applicant Contpany to obtain and submit the Environnenl Clearance fi.orn ihe Ministry of Enviro nenl, Forest ancl Clinnte Change, Gbverntrcnt of lndia and the appropriate authority of the State Government, at the tinrc of sanction to the building permission to irc concerned Special planning Authority.

Scanned by CamScanner .4lso the terms ancl conditions ntentioned in llrc Environmental Impact As seisnrc,';t Not ifcatiott isstted t intc to tinrc by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Clintate Change shall be binding orz the Applicant Contpany. 2) It shall be the resportsibility of the Applican: Contpany to dispose of the soli.d waste and vaste lrater as pet tlrc criteria decided by the l{oharashtra Pollutiott Control Board at their cost alangeitl, the provisions of the concerned Acl and regt atiotts, The nccessary Ntt obiectiott Certificate in this regard sl:r,ll be obtained by the Applicant Contpany ft'om Maharashtra Pollutiort Control Boarcl, . before initiating llrc *'ork of intplenzentation of the Int egrated Tow nship P roi ect. j) The terms and cbnditians inrposed by lhe lrrigation Deparlnrerlt and oiher concented deparlmenl of the State Govenunent rt'o,n ti,ne to time shall be binding on the Applicant Contpany. The existing nalas /water ,'esources, etc. in the area of' Integrated Tottnship Projecl shall not be closed. 4) It shall be binding on the lpplicant Company to providc water supply as per the provision of the Special regulation for Development of lntegratecl Township Project at their cost and responsibility. The conditions of lrrigalion Departnrcnt in these regards, ft'ont tinte to tine are bi,lding on the Applicant Contpany. S)The Applicant Company shall subnit the prooffor vater supply alonglith the necessary docunrcnts, etc. to the said Integrated Township Project as per the provision of the httegrated Township Project regulation, witlt the proposal of Master Plan being subrnitted to the concerned Special Planning Authority, for the approval as per the prottision of the Integrated Towrtship Project regulation. 6) It shall be binding on the Applicant Company to provide the electricity as pir the provision of Integrated. Tovnship Project regulation at their ovn cost and responsibitity. The concerned Special Planning Authority shall obtainedfrom the Applicant Conipany, the nicessary pernis$ians and,

Scanned by CamScanner the entire also the contttritntent of electricity for Jintt power ' Integrated Tottnshilt Projecl fi'om lhe concented as supply contpany before the approval of the Master Plan per the provision of the Integrated Township Proiecl reg;iation. 7) lt shall be bincling on the Apllicant Contpany to sttbmit the certificate of the Archeological Department, as Per the provision of the Integrated 'fownship Project regulation, to the concerned Special Planning Authority before obtaining the Letter of Intent. 8) The Applicant Company shall obtafued and subntit the concet'ned Special Planning Authority, before the Letter of Intent, the required No Objection CertiJicate from the Irrigation Department regarding the land bearing S. No. 15/4 arzd 37/2 ofvillage Surai, Tal. Bhiwandi. I I I) lYith respect to Devclopnrcnt- 1) The 18 ntt. wide Right of Way shcll connect a road not less than i8 ntt. in y'idtlt and sho d be developed by the Applicant Contpanl, before obraining the Letter o"f Intent front the concented Special Planning Authority. 2) Tlte Applicant Company shall eantark the location of the High Tension Electricity Line in lhe layout. The renorl

ln t e grat ed To'n' ns h i P P roj e c t.' 4) It shalt be binding on lhe Applicant Company to kePt intact the public roads ond other rights (vahivat) in lhe said Integyated Tovnship Projecr' The exisling roads / open development Plan roads/prbposed roads shall be kept for the general public. the pr?vi:i::- 5)- -.fIn the said Integrated Totonship Projec.t yea' i. i. *r,* t"r the nala /canat wit! the 'OY*:l the Applicant:{:!:, department shall be binding on "orrn*a ,',8.in :..

Scanned by CamScanner Contpany. Also in the said lntegrated Township Proiect, the distance fi'om the river, nalas, canals,'lakes, and other lrater resott"ces shall be kept by lhe Applicant Company as per the prevailing Development Control Regilalions. 6) the concerned Special Planning Authority shall ensure the quantum of land having slope equal to or ntore than I : 5 as per the authorised Contour Plan, in the said proiect, whether such lands are speciJically marked as such on the Regional Plan / Development Plan or not and also the said Applicant Company shatl pay the prenium as per the provision of the Integrated Township Proiect regdation for such lands lo the concerned District Assistant Director of Town Planning, before obtaining the Letter of httent fi'om the concerned Special Planning Autlrcrity' 7) The Applicant Contpany shall have to plan and earnark the lands at suitable locations for public purpose reset'vations along with lhe Developmert! Plan proposals for the populations to be acconttirodated 'tvithin the Integrated Township Project as per regulation and shall plan and develop the same at their otvn cost. " 8) The remarl

2) The Applicant Company shall implement the project, as per the regulation for Development of Integrated Township Project alongwith' the prevailing Development Control Regulation of the Bhhvandi Surrbunding NoriJied Area. The amendmeit/ orders etc.in the Tot'nship Project from time to ti Applicant ComPanYl

I

Scanned by CamScanner Torvnship Project are 02. 'l'hc tletails of lands unr.ler the saicl Special plan showing givcn in 'Schcdulc-A' appew)e<) ltercto, and the given lhc boundaries ol'the said Integrated Townsh'ip Project is in'Schcdule-B' appendcd hereto.'

03. The details ol'land and the plan i.e. 'Schedule-A' and 'schedule- B' shall be kept available for the inspection of the general public, during office hours on all working days at the following officcs: i) The Metropolitan Commissioner, Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority, Bandra_Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai. ii) 1'he .Ihane Col.lector, . iii) 1'he Joinr Director planning, oiTown Konkan Division, Konkan Bhavan, , Third Floor, Navi Mumbai. iv) The Assislant Director -I.o.ttn plrnnirg, of Thane Branch, Thane.

04. This Nolification shall coi.ne into force on the date of its publication. in the Maharashtra Government Gazette. 'Ihis Notilication shall also be available on--- the Wchsite- www.maharashtra.gov.in "'v Governmentvvv

Ily ordcr and in thc nalnc of the Goycrnor of Maharashtra, db@ (Ash6k K. Khan

Scanned by CamScanner ,***-'- to Go'r. N"ririiffiHHH# r r(.. rr.{2/ r.r/ur). r 2, Dcscr.\rtlili tltted 19/.1/10t?) ut'Llrrr(r N,otilrttl for iirtrgr.,rtrtl 'linvrrshlp l,rojccl tI.'litl- ,," nt Sr. No. llhh.".,rr rrr.., $. Nos. iltGN"*- ,\r'r'l I 239 (ll:r.,\rr.) 1 P 0.?12 _:s3_ l) . . 0.16(' *rt l, 0.500 4 15+ .: P J 0.2It0 25.1 P 0.240 6 t5.l P 0.sll 1 IA E 0-r.x) l1] 0.r4t Q l)) I 0.129 IO 25S ll l 1.072 156 0 0.21t{ lo-1 0 1.669 265 L I O10 I.l 26s 1 It 0.250 265 4P n ?(lt l6 266 0 I? t(o 3 0J53 l8 l?0 P 0.205 l9 2?0 P 20 270 @I P 0.61s 2i 2',1l' 0 0"855 22 272 P 0.200 712 P 0.260 2't? P 25 l_7< 0.6{8 P ?6 0.t0? 216 P 1'1 ' 0240 216 P 28 1.000 276 P )o )ol u.JUit P 30 U.J JU 293 I 3l 1(l0 T"8A--.-- 3 ;;--- uescription-.o_f LrnOs Notin.O-E.lilG ..__- Villrgc- Ivl:rnknli Tot nr.L---.l\.]j")-ffiG,.r- 32 4t I=ffi JI 41 7 34 4l 9 35 4l l0q 36 45 3 37 45 4 38 45 5 ffiv.l6U 9=

Scanned by CamScanner 0.789 0. 160 0.193 0.260

0. 190 0.273 0.3 85 0.822

0.13 1 0.3'74 0.s00 0.369 0,169 0.070 0.092 0.560 0.21 0 0. r40 i9 55 6{J j6 6l i 56 62, 56 6i 51 6-1 57 65 57 6{) 51 6gr 60 60 70: 62 0.440 -il a_:_: 0.450 6) 1.032 72 0.668 i3 0.235

I j6:-'\ 67 U,5 De:crip-ioi ol Lands liotified Ei S Tal. I ffi[]milr4; 0.157 79 & 0.271 8' t2 0.276 6t E 0.020 6_: 0.051 0.06 r

Scanned by CamScanner 83 14 't 0.102 DA i4 8 0.163 Q< 14 10P 0.0165 86 14 11 0.030 87 14 t2 0.030 Oar 14 13P 0.0085 89 i4 14 0.030 90 i4 15 0.c40 9r t4 tb 0.080 92. l4 17 0.020 93 15 3 0.282 94 t5 4 0.2t7 95 l5 1 0.010 96 15 8 0.208 91 i5 9 0.06 t 9& 15 tl 0.020 99 l5 l2 0.025 100 1? 1 0.100 0.060 101 I 17 2 102 r9 I 0.020 103 l9 2 | 0.060 101 19 3 0.080 105 l9 4 0.070 r06 21 0 1.564 0.036 107 22 1P 1.260 108 2l 0 0.445 109 71 0 ir0 1n 0.121 lll 25 7P 0.r55 0.232 112 26 1P -T-2 0.164 113 n I o.s8! 114 28 r4P I 0.298 115 34 I 0.1 135 116 34 zl 1,320 1 'l 35 0.860 18 35 iP 0.369 I19 35 z 0;129 120 3t 3 D r2l 39 1.870 ), 40 1 0.120 tz3 .10 8P 0.i25 'fotel Approx.44-99.65)ew Ha.Arc. I(handekar) Desk Of{icer

Scanned by CamScanner finn -e"a, gii

Document Verification

Traffic lmpact Assessment for Lodha Anjur Project, Name of Project: Thane.

Document Title: Traffic lmpact Assessment Report for Lodha Anjur, Thane

Name: Detailed Project Report

v) \, rr /. /"9

re LODHA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR LODHA ANJUR, THANE

NOVEMBER 2017

Submitted by:

Engineers, Architects, Planners & Graphic Designers C-401-410, Kukreja Center, Plot No.13, Sector - 11, C.B.D. Belapur, Navi Mumbai - 400 614 [: +91 022 27580192, Fax : 91-022-27572533 E-Mail: [email protected] Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ...... 1

1.1. Background ...... 1

1.2. Objectives of the Study ...... 1

1.3. Scope of Work ...... 2

1.4. Organization of the Report ...... 2

2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...... 3

2.1. Road and Rail Connectivity ...... 3

2.2. Development Plan ...... 4

3. TRAFFIC IMPACT OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...... 7

3.1. Trip Generation Rates for Residential Buildings ...... 7

3.2. Modal Split ...... 7

3.3. Hourly Variation of Entry and Exit Trips ...... 9

3.4. Traffic Impact from Proposed Development...... 11

3.5. Traffic Impact from Shops ...... 13

3.6. Traffic Impact from School and Hospital ...... 15

3.7. Traffic Impact from Community Centre, Police Station and Economic Activity ..... 17

4. TRAFFIC IMPACT ON EXTERNAL ROADS ...... 21

4.1. Introduction ...... 21

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report i

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

4.2. Methodology adopted for the traffic study ...... 21

4.3. Traffic survey location ...... 21

4.4. Traffic surveys ...... 22

4.5. Traffic Volume Survey ...... 22

4.6. Traffic from adjoining developments ...... 26

4.7. Traffic Generation from the proposed development ...... 28

4.8. Metro Effect on the Traffic Generation ...... 29

4.9. Capacity Augmentation of NH3 ...... 29

4.10. Traffic Impact on Mumbai Nashik Highway ...... 30

5. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SCHEME AND ROAD CROSS SECTIONS ...... 32

5.1. Internal Traffic Circulation ...... 32

5.2. Traffic Control ...... 32

5.3. General Recommendations for Traffic Circulations ...... 33

5.4. Ramps ...... 33

5.5. Vehicle parking and turning ...... 33

5.6. Safety and Sustainability ...... 34

5.7. Speed Barriers ...... 34

5.8. Speed Limit Signage ...... 34

5.9. Cross Section ...... 34

6. CONCLUSION ...... 41

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report ii

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

List of Figures

Figure 2-1: Location of Proposed Development ...... 3

Figure 2-2: Bhiwandi Develoment Plan ...... 4

Figure 2-3: Layout of Complex ...... 6

Figure 4-1: Survey location ...... 21

Figure 4-2: Compositions of Vehicles on NH-3 ...... 23

Figure 4-3: Composition of Traffic on NH-3 ...... 24

Figure 4-4: Hourly Variation of Traffic NH-3 ...... 24

Figure 4-5: Bhiwandi Development Plan ...... 27

Figure 4-6 Location of Anjur Phata Metro Station ...... 29

Figure 5-1: Traffic calming objects ...... 32

Figure 5-2: Vehicle turning and parking standards…………………………………………………………………….. 32

Figure 5-3: Design of car parking ...... 33

Figure 5-4: Cross Section for 12 M wide road ...... 37

Figure 5-5: Cross Section for 18 M wide road ...... 38

Figure 5-6: Cross Section for 24 M wide road ...... 39

Figure 5-7: Cross Section for 45 M wide road ...... 40

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report iii

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

List of Tables Table 2-1: Details of Development ...... 5

Table 3-1: Modal Split for Residential Buildings ...... 8

Table 3-2: Vehicle Occupancy for Residential Buildings ...... 8

Table 3-3: %Distribution of Daily Entry and Exit Trips ...... 10

Table 3-4: Adopted PCU Factors ...... 11

Table 3-5: Traffic Impact from Proposed Residential Development ...... 12

Table 3-6: Peak Hour Traffic Impact from the complex ...... 13

Table 3-7: Modal Split for Shops ...... 14

Table 3-8: Vehicle Occupancy for Shops ...... 14

Table 3-9: Traffic Impact due to Shops ...... 15

Table 3-10: Modal Split for School and Hospital ...... 16

Table 3-11: Vehicle Occupancy for School and Hospital ...... 16

Table 3-12: Traffic Impact due to School and Hospital ...... 17

Table 3-13: Modal Split for Community Centre, Post Office, Bank and Police Station ... 18

Table 3-14: Vehicle Occupancy for Community Centre, Police Station and Economic Activity ...... 18

Table 3-15: Traffic Impact due to Community Centre, Police Station and Economic Activity ...... 19

Table 3-16: Peak Hour Traffic of the Complex (PCUs/hr.) ...... 20

Table 4.1: Traffic Volume Count on approach roads ...... 22

Table 4.2: Peak Hour Traffic on Approach Road ...... 25

Table 4.3: Summary of Hourly Traffic (PCUs/Hr.) ...... 25

Table 4.4: Trip generation from adjoining development ...... 27

Table 4.5: Peak hour Traffic generation from adjoining developments ...... 28

Table 4.6: Traffic Impact projection on Mumbai Nasik Highway ...... 30

Table 4.7: Summary of Traffic Impact of proposed Development on NH-3 (PCUs/hr.) . 31

Table 4.8: Projected Traffic on NH-3 ...... 31

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report iv

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background

M/s. Lodha Developers is planning to develop a residential township with commercial shops at their plot situated at Anjur Village, Thane district. M/s. Lodha Developers has appointed Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd. as a Technical Consultant for carrying out the traffic study and to prepare Traffic Impact Assessment Report. Accordingly different parameters of the site will be studied in detail and the report will be made, giving recommendations for the development.

The proposed development is adjacent to the Mumbai Nasik Highway, which connects to Kalyan and Thane City. The plot is close to the Dombivali local Railway station. It is also a station on the Mumbai Suburban Railway system on the Central line route Thane and Kalyan. Anujr is a flourishing township which boasts of nationalized bank, hospital, post office, restaurants, school, and police station in near future.

1.2. Objectives of the Study

The objective of the project include a comprehensive study of existing traffic situation, traffic intensity, movement pattern, available infrastructure, right of way, parking demand and extent of available facility, traffic forecast based on 100% fully developed area and operations of the building occupants.

a) Review the external and internal connectivity aspects so as to appreciate the adequacy of the infrastructure proposed in terms of number of gates, road lanes etc. and if need arises suggest suitable alternatives for the better connectivity for the project.

b) Identify the adequacy of the transport infrastructure for the area and suggest the desired road network for the internal as well as external circulation of the area.

c) Suggest appropriate traffic management measures for smooth traffic flow conditions.

d) Suggest suitable scheme for parking management in the area.

e) Prepare traffic impact assessment report based on the above study. Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 1

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

f) To submit a detailed report and drawings on the basis of above study.

1.3. Scope of Work

i. Initial meetings with client and design team to review current plans, discuss traffic and transport issues, and to confirm the requirements of the traffic study;

ii. Future Traffic forecast: In order to quantify the traffic generation from the proposed development, previous data base of similar types of development done all over India to be used. If required, traffic generation surveys to be carried out to find out the traffic generation rate of similar types of development.

iii. Traffic Assignment: This involves the pattern in which the generated traffic will be distributed on the surrounding roads

iv. Traffic Impact analysis

v. Traffic management measures to mitigate the traffic impact if the impactis significant. Development of traffic management scheme.

vi. Ingress/egress points to the development site and the complete external traffic circulation vii. Prepare traffic management and circulation report.

1.4. Organization of the Report

The report has been organised in six chapters. In the first chapter the scope of the assignment as envisaged has been described in detail. The second chapter has been devoted to appreciation of the external connectivity for the plot and building characteristics. The major road and rail connectivity studied in details. Chapter three details the trip generations and traffic impact of the proposed development. Traffic carrying capacity of the present and development plan road to check their adequacy is also discussed in this chapter. Traffic impact on the external roads and the projections are discussed in chapter 4. Chapter five includes geometric details of the road including road cross sections and general traffic management plan. Conclusion of this preliminary traffic Assessment report is provided in chapter sixth.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 2

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

The plot is situated on the side of National Highway 3. The plot is surrounded by Residential / Commercial developments. The location of the plot is very lucrative for either commercial or residential development in nearby vicinity.

Dombivli Railway Station

Figure 2-1: Location of Proposed Development

2.1. Road and Rail Connectivity

The proposed land under consideration has good external connectivity. A railway line is proposed with its alignment running within the plot area. However the connectivity has also certain constraints for the development. The present and future connectivity has been appreciated in the following paragraphs.

2.1.1. Present External Connectivity

The location map of the area has been presented in fig 2.1. From the location map one can see that the land parcel considered for development is along Mumbai Nasik Highway. This road is one of the major highways connecting Mumbai city which further connects South Mumbai. Number of State Transport buses run on Mumbai Nasik Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 3

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Highway connecting various locations in Thane and Mumbai. The plot is near to the Dombivali local Railway station. It is also a station on the Mumbai Suburban Railway system on the Central line route between Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus (CSMT) and Kalyan.

2.2. Development Plan

As already mentioned, the proposed development will comprise of residential complex and commercial shops. The proposed project is planned with a complete infrastructure of internal roads, water supply, sewage, and electricity and communication networks.

Anjur Village

Figure 2-2: Bhiwandi Develoment Plan

The proposed development will provide residential accommodation to the people will also help in increase in living standards of the local residents. Proposed development will comprises of total 144488 no. of tenements. The total plot area is 560167 sq.mt,

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 4

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Development built up area is presented in below Table.

Table 2-1: Details of Development

SR NO. Type 4 wheelers 2 wheelers

Residential Open Parking 3450 26885 1 MLCP 9993 Visitors 1344 2 EWS & LIG 430 1047 3 Commercial 2985 5970 4 Town Hall 212 424 5 School 543 1086 Total 18957 35412

Figure-2.2 shows the general layout of the proposed development as per the orientation of the Development Plan.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 5

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Figure 2-3: Layout of Complex

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 6

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

3. TRAFFIC IMPACT OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

Traffic Impact from the proposed development is derived on the basis of the data base, collected from various traffic surveys conducted over the years by the consultants with respect to the traffic generation norms, modal split and vehicle occupancy.

The proposed development consists of following:

 Residential Sale Buildings 14,488 No. of Tenements

The traffic generated from these units is estimated as per following procedure.

3.1. Trip Generation Rates for Residential Buildings

The traffic generated by the residential buildings depends on the locality of the complex, social background of the families, nearness of the infrastructure like schools, shopping places, work place etc. The trip generation rates were derived based on number of flats in the proposed residential complex.

On the basis of previous traffic studies, following assumptions are made for the proposed project.

The average family size was assumed to be 5 members for the sale tenements. On the basis of these norms the total population was worked out. From the traffic study, it was observed that about 80% of population makes average one trip per day. Thus two way trips per day from total Sale Buildings will be 57132 trips per day.

3.2. Modal Split

The modal split will analyse the mode used by the residents for their day to day trips. The modal split recommended by various studies was studied in detail. As the modal split will change with respect to the availability of public transport facilities and the road network around the proposed land parcel, the most relevant area for the comparison was studied.

On the basis of observed modal split at similar residential complexes and shops in the locality, consultants have recommended following modal split for the proposed land parcel. Table below presents the modal split adopted for the present study.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 7

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 3-1: Modal Split for Residential Buildings

Modal Split

Modes Car Taxi Auto Two Private Bus Walk Total Rickshaw Wheelers Bus

Residential Sale 30% 10% 10% 20% 5% 15% 10% 100% Building

Commercial 1% 5% 3% 25% 0% 0% 66% 100% Shops

School 15% 5% 20% 15% 0% 35% 10% 100%

Hospital 30% 10% 20% 15% 0% 10% 15% 100%

Transport Hub 0% 20% 40% 0% 0% 40% 0% 100%

Economic 1% 5% 3% 25% 0% 0% 66% 100% Activity

Community 10% 10% 10% 15% 0% 5% 50% 100% Centre

Police Station 25% 10% 10% 30% 0% 5% 20% 100%

The occupancy rates as observed from the survey were considered for arriving at the number of vehicles.

Table 3-2: Vehicle Occupancy for Residential Buildings Residential Type of Vehicles Buildings Car 1.2 Taxi 2.5 Auto Rickshaw 1.9 Two Wheelers 1.0 Private Bus 40.0 Bus 50.0 Walk 1.0

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 8

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

3.3. Hourly Variation of Entry and Exit Trips

From the benchmark study of residential buildings, % distribution of trips in 24 hours of the day was observed and the same % distribution was adopted for the present study as follows:

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 9

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 3-3: %Distribution of Daily Entry and Exit Trips

Residential Shops School Hospital Community Centre Police Station Transport Hub Economic Activity Time Interval Entry % Exit % Entry % Exit % Entry % Exit % Entry % Exit % Entry % Exit % Entry % Exit % Entry % Exit % Entry % Exit %

7:00 to 8:00 0% 12% 0% 0% 30% 10% 5% 0% 12% 0% 0% 8:00 to 9:00 2% 15% 0% 0% 30% 10% 10% 10% 2% 15% 0% 0% 9:00 to 10:00 4% 15% 2% 2% 20% 5% 10% 10% 4% 15% 2% 2% 10:00 to 11:00 6% 8% 2% 2% 15% 15% 6% 8% 2% 2% 11:00 to 12:00 6% 7% 5% 3% 10% 10% 6% 7% 5% 3% 12:00 to 13:00 5% 5% 6% 5% 20% 30% 10% 5% 5% 6% 5% 13:00 to 14:00 2% 1% 6% 5% 30% 5% 5% 2% 1% 6% 5% 14:00 to 15:00 1% 2% 6% 6% 20% 1% 2% 6% 6% 15:00 to 16:00 2% 2% 8% 7% 10% 5% 5% 2% 2% 8% 7% 16:00 to 17:00 5% 5% 8% 6% 20% 10% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 8% 6% 17:00 to 18:00 5% 5% 9% 9% 20% 30% 25% 30% 5% 5% 5% 5% 9% 9% 18:00 to 19:00 8% 5% 13% 9% 10% 30% 40% 10% 10% 10% 8% 5% 13% 9% 19:00 to 20:00 13% 4% 16% 10% 10% 20% 30% 5% 5% 13% 4% 16% 10% 20:00 to 21:00 15% 3% 12% 14% 5% 40% 5% 5% 15% 3% 12% 14% 21:00 to 22:00 12% 2% 6% 15% 20% 5% 5% 12% 2% 6% 15% 22:00 to 23:00 6% 2% 1% 7% 5% 5% 5% 6% 2% 1% 7% 23:00 to 00:00 5% 2% 0% 0% 10% 5% 5% 2% 0% 0% 0:00 to 1:00 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1:00 to 2:00 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 2:00 to 3:00 0% 0% 0% 0% 3:00 to 4:00 0% 0% 0% 0% 4:00 to 5:00 0% 0% 0% 0% 5:00 to 6:00 0% 0% 0% 0% 6:00 to 7:00 5% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 10

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

3.4. Traffic Impact from Proposed Development

The traffic on any road is characterised as mixed traffic condition, resulting in complex interaction between various kinds of vehicles. To cater to this, IRC has recommended for converting different types of traffic in to a common unit of “Passenger Car Unit, (PCU)”. Each vehicle type is converted into equivalent PCUs based on their interference value. IRC has recommended the conversion factors as shown in below Table.

Table 3-4: Adopted PCU Factors

Type of Vehicles PCU Factor Car/Van Jeep 1 Taxi 1 Auto Rickshaw 0.75 Bus 3 Two Wheelers 0.5 Cycle 0.5 Source: IRC106-1990

On the basis of Modal Split, Vehicles Occupancy Ratio, hourly variation of Traffic and PCU factors, the traffic impact from the residential and commercial complex in terms of PCU/Day was derived

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 11

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 3-5: Traffic Impact from Proposed Residential Development Total Entry & Total Entry & Total Entry & Total Entry & Total Entry & Total Entry & Total Entry & Exit Time (hrs) Exit Parcel 1 Exit Parcel 2 Exit Parcel 3 Exit Parcel 4 Exit Parcel 5 Exit Parcel 6 Parcel 7, 8 & 8A 7:00 to 8:00 698 47 191 335 1118 140 503 8:00 to 9:00 990 67 270 475 1583 198 712 9:00 to 10:00 1106 74 302 531 1770 221 796 10:00 to 11:00 815 55 223 391 1304 163 587 11:00 to 12:00 757 51 207 363 1211 151 545 12:00 to 13:00 582 39 159 279 931 116 419 13:00 to 14:00 175 12 48 84 279 35 126 14:00 to 15:00 175 12 48 84 279 35 126 15:00 to 16:00 233 16 64 112 373 47 168 16:00 to 17:00 582 39 159 279 931 116 419 17:00 to 18:00 582 39 159 279 931 116 419 18:00 to 19:00 757 51 207 363 1211 151 545 19:00 to 20:00 990 67 270 475 1583 198 712 20:00 to 21:00 1048 71 286 503 1676 210 754 21:00 to 22:00 815 55 223 391 1304 163 587 22:00 to 23:00 466 31 127 224 745 93 335 23:00 to 00:00 407 27 111 196 652 81 293 0:00 to 1:00 116 8 32 56 186 23 84 1:00 to 2:00 58 4 16 28 93 12 42 2:00 to 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 to 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 to 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 to 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 to 7:00 291 20 80 140 466 58 210

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 12

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

The morning and evening peak hour traffic generated from the complex will be as follows: Table 3-6: Peak Hour Traffic Impact from the complex

Peak Hr Traffic (PCUs/hr)

Traffic Generated from Morning Peak Hr Evening Peak Hr

9:00 to 10:00 hrs 20:00 to 21:00 hrs

Residential Sale Buildings Parcel 1 1106 1048

Residential Sale Buildings Parcel 2 74 71

Residential Sale Buildings Parcel 3 302 286

Residential Sale Buildings Parcel 4 531 503

Residential Sale Buildings Parcel 5 1770 1676

Residential Sale Buildings Parcel 6 221 210

Residential Sale Buildings Parcel 7, 796 754 8 & 8A

3.5. Traffic Impact from Shops

From the benchmark study of shops in the residential buildings, % distribution of trips in 24 hours of the day was observed and the same % distribution was adopted for the present study as well. On the basis of above % variation, the hourly entry and exit traffic specifically for shops was worked out as follows. On the basis of previous traffic studies, the trip rates for shops are assumed as follows:  Shops: 30 trips per day per 100sqm of carpet area Thus the total trips per day from above will be about 919 trips per day

On the basis of observed modal split at similar residential complexes and shops in the locality, consultants have recommended following modal split for the proposed land parcel. Table below presents the modal split adopted for the present study.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 13

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 3-7: Modal Split for Shops Commercial Type of Vehicles Shops Car 1% Taxi 5% Auto Rickshaw 3% Two Wheelers 25% Private Bus 0% Bus 0% Walk 66% Total 100%

The occupancy rates as observed from the survey were considered for arriving at the number of vehicles. Table 3-8: Vehicle Occupancy for Shops Commercial Type of Vehicles Shops Car 1.2 Taxi 2.5 Auto Rickshaw 1.9 Two Wheelers 1.0 Private Bus 40.0 Bus 50.0 Walk 1.0

On the basis of Modal Split, Vehicles Occupancy Ratio, hourly variation of Traffic and PCU factors, the traffic impact from the commercial shops in terms of PCU/Day was derived.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 14

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 3-9: Traffic Impact due to Shops

Traffic Impact from Shop (PCUs/hr) Time Interval Entry Exit Total 7:00 to 8:00 0 0 0 8:00 to 9:00 0 0 0 9:00 to 10:00 3 3 6 10:00 to 11:00 3 3 6 11:00 to 12:00 8 5 12 12:00 to 13:00 9 8 17 13:00 to 14:00 9 8 17 14:00 to 15:00 9 9 18 15:00 to 16:00 12 11 23 16:00 to 17:00 12 9 21 17:00 to 18:00 14 14 27 18:00 to 19:00 20 14 33 19:00 to 20:00 24 15 39 20:00 to 21:00 18 21 39 21:00 to 22:00 9 23 32 22:00 to 23:00 2 11 12 23:00 to 00:00 0 0 0 0:00 to 1:00 0 0 0 1:00 to 2:00 0 0 0 2:00 to 3:00 0 0 0 3:00 to 4:00 0 0 0 4:00 to 5:00 0 0 0 5:00 to 6:00 0 0 0 6:00 to 7:00 0 0 0

Adding above traffic to the total traffic generated from the complex, the total peak hour traffic impact from the shops would be:

 Morning Peak Hour Traffic : 11:00-12:00 a.m.: 12 PCUs/hr.

 Evening Peak Hour Traffic : 20:00-21:00 p.m.: 39 PCUs/hr.

3.6. Traffic Impact from School and Hospital

On the basis of previous traffic studies, the trip rates for school and hospital are assumed as follows:  School Building 1: 2600 Students and 260 Staff  School Building 2: 2100 Students and 210 Staff Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 15

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

 Hospital: 20 trips per day per 100sqm of carpet area Thus the total trips per day from above will be  School Building 1: 2860 trips per day  School Building 2: 2310 trips per day  Hospital: 265 trips per day

On the basis of observed modal split at similar school and Hospital in the locality, consultants have recommended following modal split for the proposed land parcel. Table below presents the modal split adopted for the present study.

Table 3-10: Modal Split for School and Hospital Modal Split Type of Vehicles School Hospital Car 15% 30% Taxi 5% 10% Auto Rickshaw 20% 20% Two Wheelers 15% 15% Private Bus 0% 0% Bus 35% 10% Walk 10% 15% Total 100% 100%

The occupancy rates as observed from the survey were considered for arriving at the number of vehicles. Table 3-11: Vehicle Occupancy for School and Hospital

Vehicle Occupancy Type of Vehicles School Hospital Car 3.0 1.2 Taxi 0.0 0.0 Auto Rickshaw 3.0 1.0 Two Wheelers 1.0 1.0 Private Bus 40.0 0.0 Bus 50.0 20.0 Walk 1.0 1.0

On the basis of Modal Split, Vehicles Occupancy Ratio, hourly variation of Traffic and PCU factors, the traffic impact from the School and Hospital in terms of PCU/Day was derived.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 16

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 3-12: Traffic Impact due to School and Hospital Traffic Impact from Traffic Impact from Traffic Impact from School Building 1 School Building 2 Hospital (PCUs/hr.) Time Interval (PCUs/hr.) (PCUs/hr.) Entry Exit Total Entry Exit Total Entry Exit Total 7:00 to 8:00 211 0 211 170 0 170 16 0 16 8:00 to 9:00 211 0 211 170 0 170 16 0 16 9:00 to 10:00 141 0 141 114 0 114 8 0 8 10:00 to 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 to 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 to 13:00 141 211 352 114 170 284 16 0 16 13:00 to 14:00 0 211 211 0 170 170 0 0 0 14:00 to 15:00 0 141 141 0 114 114 0 0 0 15:00 to 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 16:00 to 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 16 47 17:00 to 18:00 0 141 141 0 114 114 47 39 86 18:00 to 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 47 62 19:00 to 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 20:00 to 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 21:00 to 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 to 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 23:00 to 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 0:00 to 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 to 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 to 3:00 3:00 to 4:00 4:00 to 5:00 5:00 to 6:00 6:00 to 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0

3.7. Traffic Impact from Community Centre, Police Station and Economic Activity

On the basis of previous traffic studies, the trip rates for Community Centre, Police Station and Economic Activity are assumed as follows:  Community Centre: 70 trips per day per 100sqm of carpet area  Police Station: 20 trips per day per 100sqm of carpet area  Economic Activity: 30 trips per day per 100sqm of carpet area Thus the total trips per day from above will be  Community Centre: 1170 trips per day  Police Station: 162 trips per day  Economic Activity: 9755 trips per day

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 17

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

On the basis of observed modal split at similar Community Centre, Police Station and Economic Activity in the locality, consultants have recommended following modal split for the proposed land parcel. Table below presents the modal split adopted for the present study.

Table 3-13: Modal Split for Community Centre, Post Office, Bank and Police Station Modal Split Type of Vehicles Community Police Economic Centre Station Activity Car 10% 25% 1% Taxi 10% 10% 5% Auto Rickshaw 10% 10% 3% Two Wheelers 15% 30% 25% Private Bus 0% 0% 0% Bus 5% 5% 0% Walk 50% 20% 66% Total 100% 100% 100%

The occupancy rates as observed from the survey were considered for arriving at the number of vehicles. Table 3-14: Vehicle Occupancy for Community Centre, Police Station and Economic Activity

Vehicle Occupancy Type of Vehicles Community Police Economic Centre Station Activity Car 2.1 1.2 1.2 Taxi 1.2 1.2 1.2 Auto Rickshaw 2.2 1.2 1.2 Two Wheelers 1.2 1.1 1.0 Private Bus 40 40.0 40 Bus 20 20.0 20 Walk 1.0 1.0 1.0

On the basis of Modal Split, Vehicles Occupancy Ratio, hourly variation of Traffic and PCU factors, the traffic impact from the Community Centre, Post Office, Bank and Police Station in terms of PCU/Day was derived.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 18

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 3-15: Traffic Impact due to Community Centre, Police Station and Economic Activity Traffic Impact Traffic Impact Traffic Impact from Economic from Community from Police Time Interval Activity Centre (PCUs/hr.) Station (PCUs/hr.) (PCUs/hr.) Entry Exit Total Entry Exit Total Entry Exit Total 7:00 to 8:00 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 8:00 to 9:00 0 0 0 8 8 16 0 0 0 9:00 to 10:00 0 0 0 8 8 16 32 32 64 10:00 to 11:00 0 0 0 12 12 24 32 32 64 11:00 to 12:00 0 0 0 8 8 16 81 48 129 12:00 to 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 81 177 13:00 to 14:00 0 0 0 4 4 8 97 81 177 14:00 to 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 97 193 15:00 to 16:00 0 0 0 4 4 8 129 113 242 16:00 to 17:00 27 0 27 4 4 8 129 97 226 17:00 to 18:00 82 0 82 4 4 8 145 145 290 18:00 to 19:00 110 27 137 8 8 16 209 145 354 19:00 to 20:00 55 82 137 4 4 8 258 161 419 20:00 to 21:00 0 110 110 4 4 8 193 226 419 21:00 to 22:00 0 55 55 4 4 8 97 242 338 22:00 to 23:00 0 0 0 4 4 8 16 113 129 23:00 to 00:00 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0:00 to 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 to 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 to 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 to 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 to 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 to 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 to 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Adding above traffic to the total traffic generated from the residential parcels, the total peak hour traffic impact from the complex would be presented in table below.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 19

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 3-16: Peak Hour Traffic of the Complex (PCUs/hr.) Peak Hr Traffic (PCUs/hr)

Morning Peak Hr Evening Peak Hr Traffic Generated from 20:00 to 21:00 9:00 to 10:00 hrs hrs Residential Sale 1106 1048 Buildings_Parcel 1 Residential Sale 74 71 Buildings_Parcel 2 Residential Sale 302 286 Buildings Parcel 3 Residential Sale 531 503 Buildings_Parcel 4 Residential Sale 1770 1676 Buildings_Parcel 5 Residential Sale 221 210 Buildings_Parcel 6 Residential Sale Buildings_Parcel 7, 8 & 796 754 8A Shop 6 39 School-1 141 0 School-2 114 0 Hospital 8 8 Community Centre 0 110 Police Station 7 4 Economic Activity 64 419 Total 5140 5127

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 20

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

4. Traffic Impact on External Roads

4.1. Introduction

In order to arrive at the present traffic demand and appreciate the travel characteristics of the road users as well as the residents in this area, field studies were organised. The observations from the field studies have been presented in this chapter.

4.2. Methodology adopted for the traffic study

To assess the impact on the external road network the current traffic characteristics need to be assessed. For this purpose, vehicular count survey was conducted at the midblock near the proposed development i.e. at Mumbai Nasik Highway. On the basis of these surveys, the traffic on proposed roads are estimated and projected for future. The traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development was then added to the existing traffic on connecting Road to see what the situation on road will be like after the proposed development is complete on site.

4.3. Traffic survey location

Figure below presents the survey location near the proposed development. As already mentioned, Vehicular traffic movement Surveys were carried out at one location near the proposed development. The survey was carried out to take count of both upstream as well as downstream traffic for 16 hours. The survey location with respect to the site has been shown in the figure below.

Figure 4-1: Survey location

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 21

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

4.4. Traffic surveys

The traffic survey formats are designed on the basis of objectives of the study and the data to be collected during the survey. Special teams consisting of Traffic survey supervisors and enumerators were constituted to carry out the surveys. The activity included:

• Training of enumerators

• Constitution of survey teams

• Carrying out of surveys

Classified Traffic Volume Survey was carried out manually and counts were recorded at 15 minutes interval. The vehicle classifications as suggested in TOR/IRC Codes were followed. All results have been presented in tabular and graphical forms. The data collected was computerized in MS-EXCEL software.

4.5. Traffic Volume Survey

As part of the data collection it was decided to undertake the traffic volume count surveys so as to get the present peak hour demand on the approach roads. The appreciation of trip generation rates as well as modal split was undertaken on the basis of previous studies undertaken in the recent past two to three years. The location selected for the traffic volume count surveys was at Mumbai Nasik Highway on both sides of the road in front of the site for proposed development.

The traffic volume count surveys were undertaken for one day for 15 hours at this location on 20-11-2017.

Table below presents the summary of traffic volume count at NH-3.

Table 4.1: Traffic Volume Count on approach roads Vehicles / Type of Vehicles PCUs/day day 14326 14326 Car/Vans/Jeeps 194 194.4 Taxi 194 290.7 Mini Buses 296 889.2 Bus

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 22

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Vehicles / Type of Vehicles PCUs/day day 155 464 Private Bus 1672 1254 Auto Rickshaw 10859 5429 Two Wheelers 293 220 Goods Auto 2079 3119 Mini LCV's 1927 2891 LCV's 3198 9594 2 - Axle Trucks 460 1379 3 - Axle Trucks 485 2182 MAV/Containers 0 0 Others Total 36137 42231 Source: Traffic Volume Survey, November 2017

4.5.1. Composition of Commercial and Passenger Traffic

The analysis of composition of traffic on NH-3 shows that the passenger vehicles traffic is about 77% of total traffic and the share of commercial vehicles traffic is at 23% of total traffic.

23% Passenger Vehicles 77% Commercial Vehicles

Figure 4-2: Compositions of Vehicles on NH-3

On Mumbai Nasik Highway-3, the percentage of two wheelers and cars in the total traffic volume is 30 % & 40 % respectively. The composition of auto rickshaws (passenger) is around 5% as shown in the figure below. The composition of 2 Axle Truck and Mini LCV’s in the traffic volume is 9 % & 6 % respectively.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 23

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Modal Split Car/Vans/Jeeps

Two Wheelers 5% 5% 1% 6% 2 - Axle Trucks 9% 40% Mini LCV's 30% LCV's

Auto Rickshaw

MAV/Containers

Figure 4-3: Composition of Traffic on NH-3

4.5.1. Hourly Variation of Traffic:

Figure below presents the hourly variation of traffic. As can be seen from the graph, there is tidal variation in traffic. The peak hour traffic of 3019 PCUs/hr (bothways) is observed between 12:00 to 13:00 hrs.

Hourly Variation Obeserved on NH-3 (PCUs/hr.) 3500 3000 2500 2000 Mumbai to Nashik

1500 PCUs PCUs perHour Nashik to Mumbai 1000 500 0

Figure 4-4: Hourly Variation of Traffic NH-3

The Peak Hour Factor (PHF) (defined as the ratio between the numbers of vehicles counted during the peak hour in terms of PCU per hour to the total vehicles counted in a day) is 8.3% during peak hour. The hourly traffic count data is kept at Annexure-1.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 24

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

The peak hour traffic observed on NH-3 was as follows:

Table 4.2: Peak Hour Traffic on Approach Road Type of Vehicles PCUs/Hr. Car/Vans/Jeeps 1130 Taxi 12 Mini Buses 27 BEST /Govt. Bus 47 Private Bus 29 Auto Rickshaw 114 Two Wheelers 551 Goods Auto 15 Mini LCV 257 LCV's 202 2 Axle Trucks 407 3 Axle Trucks 92 MAV/Trailers/Containers 138 Others 0 Total Vehicles per hr. 2961 Total PCUs/Hr. 3115 Capacity of Road 5400 Present V/C Ratio 0.56 Source: Traffic Volume Survey, November 2017

Mumbai Nasik Highway is 6 lanes divided - two way road. The capacity of this road as per IRC: 106-1990 is 5400 PCUs/hr. Hence the present Volume to Capacity Ratio (V/C Ratio) is 0.56.

The hourly variation of traffic in terms of PCUs/hr was as follows:

Table 4.3: Summary of Hourly Traffic (PCUs/Hr.) Total Traffic in Terms of PCUs/hr Mumbai to Nashik to Time Interval Bothway Nashik Mumbai (PCUs/hr.) (PCUs/hr.) (PCUs/hr.) 8:00 to 9:00 1181 1660 2841 9:00 to 10:00 1213 1806 3019 10:00 to 11:00 1150 1705 2855 11:00 to 12:00 1176 1910 3085

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 25

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Total Traffic in Terms of PCUs/hr Mumbai to Nashik to Time Interval Bothway Nashik Mumbai (PCUs/hr.) (PCUs/hr.) (PCUs/hr.) 12:00 to 13:00 1198 1917 3115 13:00 to 14:00 1086 1631 2717 14:00 to 15:00 1079 1727 2806 15:00 to 16:00 1230 1543 2772 16:00 to 17:00 1320 1548 2868 17:00 to 18:00 1360 1660 3020 18:00 to 19:00 1095 1510 2605 19:00 to 20:00 1325 1559 2883 20:00 to 21:00 1491 1270 2760 21:00 to 22:00 1479 1169 2649 22:00 to 23:00 1319 916 2234 Total 18700 23531 42231 Source: Traffic Volume Survey, November 2017

4.6. Traffic from adjoining developments

The traffic generated from the proposed development and the traffic from the upcoming infrastructure in the radius 5 KM from the proposed development will be added to the existing traffic on connecting road in the near vicinity of the proposed development.

As per the Bhiwandi Development plan the area near the proposed development includes industrial, commercial, residential and public places. Traffic impact of all types of upcoming developments are analysed based on their trip generation. Figure given below provides the classification of the upcoming development within the vicinity of 5 km from the proposed development.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 26

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Figure 4-5: Bhiwandi Development Plan Trip generations from the upcoming development given below is based on the data available in Bhiwandi development plan and Bhiwandi development control regulations Table 4.4: Trip generation from adjoining development Type of Plot Construction Built Up Carpet Trips/ Trips FSI Development Area Area Area Area 100 sq.m /day Public 31400 25120 1.5 37680 28260 10 2826 Industrial 141300 113040 1.5 169560 127170 10 12717 Residential 259050 207240 1.5 310860 233145 4 9326 Commercial 70650 56520 1.5 84780 63585 30 19076

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 27

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

4.7. Traffic Generation from the proposed development

Table 4.5: Peak hour Traffic generation from adjoining developments

Total Traffic Impact from Adjoining Development (PCUs/hr) Time Interval Total Residential Commercial Industrial Public Traffic Generation 7:00 to 8:00 410 0 81 81 572 8:00 to 9:00 581 0 1211 1211 3003 9:00 to 10:00 479 0 1413 1413 3304 10:00 to 11:00 513 350 1130 1480 3473 11:00 to 12:00 479 448 202 650 1778 12:00 to 13:00 410 652 0 652 1713 13:00 to 14:00 137 895 0 895 1927 14:00 to 15:00 103 742 0 742 1586 15:00 to 16:00 137 824 0 824 1785 16:00 to 17:00 342 1165 81 1246 2833 17:00 to 18:00 342 1388 807 2196 4733 18:00 to 19:00 444 1231 1413 2643 5731 19:00 to 20:00 581 1313 1413 2726 6033 20:00 to 21:00 615 1245 323 1568 3751 21:00 to 22:00 479 851 0 851 2181 22:00 to 23:00 273 695 0 695 1664 23:00 to 00:00 239 312 0 312 863

Yearly traffic generation from the adjoining upcoming developments is based on the traffic growth rate and development rate of the Thane District (5%) and the table for the peak hour traffic generation by the year 2037 is given below

Peak Hour Year Traffic (9:00 to 10:00) 2017 165 2022 201 2027 244 2032 286 2037 319

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 28

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

4.8. Metro Effect on the Traffic Generation

Metro line number 5 is proposed between Thane and Kalyan with total number 17 stations. It is likely to be commissioned by the year 2022. Anjur phata metro station is proposed near the proposed development. This station is situated under 4 km vicinity from the proposed development. Thane and Kalyan are two major cities near the proposed development therefore it is understandable that educational, working trips to these cities will be shifted to Metro in coming years. Therefore effect of metro is considered in traffic projections after the year 2022. Location of the Anjur phata metro station is given below.

Figure 4-6 Location of Anjur Phata Metro Station

4.9. Capacity Augmentation of NH3

The stretch of Mumbai Nashik express highway in front of proposed development is 6 lanes divided two way road. As per the Bhiwandi Area development plan (2008-2028) this road will be widened to 8 lanes divided two way road with the capacity of 7200 PCU in peak hour. While calculating the effect of proposed and adjoining developments on the Mumbai Nashik highway the capacity of the road is considered as 7200 PCU/Hr based on the widening of the road.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 29

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

4.10. Traffic Impact on Mumbai Nashik Highway

Based on the traffic generated from the proposed development, adjoining development, commissioning of the metro and the capacity of the augmentation of the Mumbai Nasik highway the traffic impact on the road is calculated and projected for the year 2037. The traffic generated from the proposed & adjoining development will be added to the existing traffic on NH-3. Table below shows the hourly traffic observed on the road, hourly traffic generated from the development and total hourly traffic after development. Table 4.6: Traffic Impact projection on Mumbai Nasik Highway Mumbai Nasik Express Highway Year Volume Capacity V/C LOS 2017 3019 5400 0.42 B 2018 3110 5400 0.43 B 2019 3203 5400 0.44 B 2020 3299 5400 0.46 B 2021 3398 5400 0.47 B 2022 4825 7200 0.67 C 2023 4970 7200 0.69 C 2024 5119 7200 0.71 D 2025 5273 7200 0.73 D 2026 5431 7200 0.75 D 2027 5594 7200 0.78 D 2028 5762 7200 0.80 D 2029 5935 7200 0.82 D 2030 6113 7200 0.85 D 2031 6296 7200 0.87 D 2032 6485 7200 0.90 D 2033 6679 7200 0.93 E 2034 6880 7200 0.96 E 2035 7086 7200 0.98 E 2036 7299 7200 1.01 F 2037 7518 7200 1.04 F

The peak hour traffic on Mumbai Nasik Highway in the year 2022 after the development will be 4825 PCUs/hr. The capacity of the road by the year 2022 as per Development plan of Bhiwandi is 7200 PCUs/hr. Thus the V/C Ratio on the road after the proposed development will be 0.67. The road is getting saturated by the year 2036 and need capacity augmentation afterwards. It is suggested to increase the carriageway of the

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 30

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd. road to 10 lanes with the grade separator segregating through traffic from the local traffic.

Table 4.7: Summary of Traffic Impact of proposed Development on NH-3 (PCUs/hr.)

Particulars Mumbai Nasik Highway

Present Traffic at Peak Hour 3019 (2017) Traffic Impact from 1967 Proposed Buildings Traffic Traffic after metro 4825 effect

Present Capacity of Road 5400

Future Capacity of the road 7200

Present V/C Ratio 0.56

V/C Ratio after 0.67 Development

The traffic on the Mumbai Nasik Highway was projected for future years till 2037. Also the V/C ratio analysis was calculated incorporating the traffic from the development after projecting the values for future as shown in the table below.

Table 4.8: Projected Traffic on NH-3 Peak hour V/C Ratio for Road after Year traffic PCUs/hr) proposed development 2017 3019 0.56 2022 4825 0.67 2027 5594 0.78 2032 6485 0.90 2037 7518 1.04

Thus it can be concluded that the total traffic on Mumbai Nasik Highway will not be much affected by the proposed development although capacity augmentation is necessary in coming future

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 31

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

5. Traffic Management Scheme and Road Cross Sections

5.1. Internal Traffic Circulation

Internal circulation should be designed in such a way that the manoeuvring of vehicle is easy to understand for users as well as easy for traffic circulation. Entry and Exit for each parcel of development should be kept separate so that queuing should not take place. All the parts of each parcel should be able to access internally in the case of emergency, for ex. fire breakdowns, medical emergencies etc.

5.2. Traffic Control

Speeding inside the development, blind turns rash driving can lead to serious or fatal accidents. To avoid these accidents it is necessary to provide proper traffic control measures inside the complex. Pedestrians are the most vulnerable victims in any street accidents. To regulate the traffic inside the complex a comprehensive traffic movement signage plan will be prepared for each parcel which includes pedestrian walk, pedestrian crossing, speed limit signages, stop and go signages, speed breaker etc. Signages are required inside the buildings to provide proper directions to the drivers and to avoid confusion while driving on the driveways. A signage plan is therefore prepared along with proper location. Apart from signage boards, speed breaker locations are proposed inside the building at few necessary locations to avoid conflicts and to control the speed of the vehicles. Different signages like informatory sign, directional sign and cautionary sign will be suggested to manage the traffic system inside the development easily and safely.

Figure 5-1: Traffic calming objects

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 32

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

5.3. General Recommendations for Traffic Circulations

 One way circulation is suggested on inner manoeuvring spaces where driveway width is about 6.0 m for smooth movement of vehicles.

 For two way circulation, approximately the driveway width is about 7.5 meters which provides smooth manoeuvring of vehicles.

 Traffic Signal is proposed near the entry exit gate of the parcels as it will remove the vehicular conflict and congestion.

 To remove the conflict of the internal traffic , it is suggested to provide roundabout at specific locations

5.4. Ramps

One way ramps should be provided in all the MLCP with 6 m width. No parking is provided along the length of the ramp, adjacent to ramp to get proper turning radius for the vehicles which are going from one level to other level. Offset should be given before the ramp of one car length to have convenience in circulation as far as possible. Ramp slope should be given as 1:10 as far as possible.

5.5. Vehicle parking and turning

. On the road where only cars are moving, the turning radius can be 6m. . Parking size should be minimum = 2.5m x 5m. . 5 m (Preferable drive way width is 5.5 m) driveway is proposed on Parking floors of all the Multilevel Car Parking . 7 m driveway (thorough fare) for 2 way circulation.

Figure 5-2: Vehicle turning and parking standards Figure 5-3: Design of car parking

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 33

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

5.6. Safety and Sustainability

Safety of pedestrians and drivers is one of the most important factors for any complex. Vehicles moving inside the parcels should be restricted to a certain speed limit. For restricting speed of the vehicles, vertical delineators are suggested in the form of speed barriers. Also speed limit signages are suggested at specific locations inside the complex to regulate the traffic within permissible vehicle speed limit.

5.7. Speed Barriers

Vertical speed breakers are the most famous and efficient speed barriers used across the world. Dimensions of speed breakers differ from place to place. These speed breakers will not only reduce the speed of vehicle inside the complex but also resist drivers to accelerate inside the complex. They reduce the chances of vehicle and pedestrian accidents and therefore speed breakers are provided near the pedestrian crossing inside the complex.

5.8. Speed Limit Signage

For safe movement of pedestrian and vehicles, drivers are required to drive at a safe speed limit. Speed limit signages are provided to inform drivers about the maximum speed limit inside the complex. These signages are proposed to be mounted at several places according to the geometry of the road and pedestrian crossings inside the complex. Maximum suggested speed limit inside the complex is 10 Km/hr.

5.9. Cross Section

Cross sections for all the roads inside and near the proposed developments are suggested below.

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 34

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Figure 5-4: Cross Section for 12 M wide road

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 37

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Figure 5-5: Cross Section for 18 M wide road

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 38

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Figure 5-6: Cross Section for 24 M wide road

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 39

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Figure 5-7: Cross Section for 45 M wide road

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 40

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

6. Conclusion

1. The proposed development is adjacent to the Mumbai Nasik Highway, which connects to Nashik and Thane City.

2. The proposed development consists of 14488 No. of Tenements.

3. Two way trips from total Sale Buildings will be 57132 trips per day.

4. Total peak hour traffic from 9 AM to 10 AM is about 5140.

5. Adequacy for all the roads around the development periphery is identified and the Level of Service is under critical limits.

6. General suggestions are provided regarding traffic circulation and management.

7. Road cross sections for all types of proposed geometry are suggested.

8. Traffic Impact from proposed and adjoining development on Mumbai Nasik Highway:

Particulars Mumbai Nasik Highway Present Traffic at Peak Hour 3019 (2017) Traffic Impact from Proposed 1967 Buildings Traffic Traffic after metro 4825 effect Present Capacity of Road 5400

Future Capacity of the road 7200

Present V/C Ratio 0.56

V/C Ratio after Development 0.67

The traffic on the Mumbai Nasik Highway was projected for future years till 2037. Also the V/C ratio analysis was calculated incorporating the traffic from the development after projecting the values for future as shown in the table below.

Peak hour traffic V/C Ratio for Road after proposed Year PCUs/hr) development 2017 3019 0.56 2022 4825 0.67 2027 5594 0.78 2032 6485 0.90 2037 7518 1.04

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 41

Lodha Developers Aakar Abhinav Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Thus it can be concluded that the total traffic on Mumbai Nasik Highway will not be much affected by the proposed development although capacity augmentation is necessary in coming future.

9. Traffic Mitigation Measures

 External Connectivity

i. As per the Development plan of the Bhiwandi area, present 6 lane Mumbai Nasik Highway with the capacity of 5400 PCU will be widened to 8 lane road with capacity of 7200 by the year 2021.

ii. As per Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authorities, Mumbai Metro line number 5 (Thane – Kalyan) is likely to be commissioned by the year 2021. Nearest metro station Anjur Phata of this metro line is only 4 km away from the proposed development. It is understandable that large percentage of passenger trips from the proposed and adjoining developments will shift to this metro.

 Internal Traffic Circulation:-

i. One way traffic circulation plan is prepared for all 6 m wide internal roads for conflict free traffic movement. Two way circulations are only planned on 12 m wide road.

ii. Traffic Management scheme is prepared for internal traffic circulation with all regulatory and informatory signage. iii. Traffic rotaries and signals are planned wherever necessary to remove congestion and conflicts

Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report 42

Ann.*'a- -@

PROPOSEI] RES!DENT]AL BUILDINGS AT ANJUR, MANKOLI, SURAI, THANE

SUBMITTED TO: A"JITNATH H!.TECH BUILDERS PW. LTD.

FEBRUARY 2017

.l \ n

expioration;€3f t! ^nent $g

:PERFECT*,, GEOTECHNICS PERFECTION :HE RESULI OF SUCCESS 'S ';ff"tffi*> RFECT*, PERFECT '!r 24.25. r,!..uti,a.adise. N ICS Seclor 15. CdD Belapur OTECH ')F :TION IS THE RESULT 51:',:i;' Navi Mur.}i .1C961,1

FrNAL GEOTECHNTCAL TNVESTtGATTON REpORT FOB PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS AT ANJUR. MANKOLI, SURAI. THANE FOR AJITNATH HI.TECH BUILDERS PVT. LTD.

Table of Contents

sN. SECTION ITEM PAGE

1 '1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2 2.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM 1

J 2.1 EXPLORATION SCOPE 1

4 2.2 Subsurface Conditions E 2.3 Ground Water Levels

b 3.0 FOU NDATION RECOMIVENDATIONS

7 3.1 Foundation Protection 7 8 4.0 FIELD EXPLOMTION PROCEDURES 8

I References/Ca lculation 913 ANNEXURE

Figure '1 : Borehole Logs Laboratory Test Results Photographs of Core Boxes Location Plan of Boreholes :PERSECT* GECTECHNICS

F|NAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPCRT FOR PROPOSHD RESIDENTIAL BUILDII'IGS AT ANJUR. MANKOLI. SURAI. THANE FOR AJITNATH HI-TECH BUILDERS PVT. LTD.

I-O INTRODUCTION

Ajitnatlr Hi-Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. plans construction of residential buildings at Anjur, Thane.

The proposed bui|6lings will consist of Ground + 16 upper floors. The wo* of Geotechnical

lnvestigation was awarded to Perfect Geotechnics Pvt. Ltd. The field work and laboratory

for the Geotechnical lnvestigation were completed by Perfect Geotechnics Pvt. Ltd. in

2017. This final report presents results of the geotechnical investigation, along with

engineering recommendations for the proposed buildings.

2.O EXPLORATIO{TT PROGRAIUI

(BH-1 to BH-30, BH-31 to BH-34 and BH-36 to BH41) were completed for

as illustrated on the Borehole Location Plan in the Annexure. Borehole numbers

reduced levels are given in table A below.

1 ;PERFEC? GEOTECHi\

TABLE A BOREHOLE GROUND REDUCED LEVELS AND TERMINATION DEPTHS BOREHOLE BOREHOLE NUMBER GROUND REDUCED LEVEL TERMINATION DEPTH BELOW GROUND BH.O1

'15.0m

I TABLE A (Continued) BOREHOLE NUMBERS AND GROUND REDUCED LEVELS

BOREHOLE BOREHOLE NUMBER GROUND REDUCED LEVEL TERMINATION DEPTH BELOW GROUND BH-38 15.0m 3.7m

2.2 Subsurface Conditions

Subsurface profile at this site generally consists of residual soil overlying completely

weahered rock underlain by basalt bedrock. Encountered soil/rock layers are described

below;

l: RESIDUAL SOIL

soils, mnsisting mostly of yellowish brown clay were encountered at ground

in the boreholes. Based on standard Penetration Tests (SPT) conducted within this

of cohesive soils (clay) was very stiff. The lower boundary of this layer

at depths of 0.2m to 5.2m below ground.

: COMPLETELY WEATHERED ROCK

weathered bedrock was encountered at depths oI 0.2m to 5.2m below ground

This layer is formed by the complete in-place disintegration of parent bedrock

still partially retains the original rock mass structure. sPT tests conducted in

I layer encountered refusals. core recoveries were typically less than 30%. The lower

of this layerwas encountered at depths of 0:3m to 10.5m below ground.

,YER III: HARD BASALT BEDROCK

basalt bed rock was encountered at depths of 0.3m to 10.5m below ground surface in

boreholes. The bedrock was highly weathered to sound. core Recoveries varied

30% and 97%, while Rock Quality Designation (RQD) ranged between 30o/o and The Compressive strength of rock core samples varied from 8'l kg/cm2 to 734 kg/cm2. ground oles were terminated in this bedrock layer at a depth of 15.0m below surface.

accumulation in boreholes was monitored during and after completion of

Groundwater was observed in boreholes at a depth of 8"lm to 9'9m below

Seasonal and annual fluctuations in ground water levels can be expected'

4 ;PERFEqT* GECT=C:.1NICS

'r.,r '-illlrD.:\T: )'l -:''l'r '-:r'ii:.''f:,:Il ;

I ! Foundation recommendations are srrmmarized in table B below.

TABLE B FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS i DEPTH TO NET ALLOWABLE BEARING DEPTH TO CWR I nlRo nocx CAPACITY

300 Um2

2OO llm2

'150 Um2 100 Vm'(On HR) and 50

2oo um2

100 Um' (On HR) and 50

200llm2

weathered rock be identified as it offers complete refusals to bucket excavators. .PERFEqT* g,Eq]F.qh],Y"gJ

TABLE B (Con tintr ad) FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEPTH TO NETALLOWABLE DEPTH TO HARD BOREHOLE COMPLETELY BEARING NUMBER ROCK WEATHERED ROCK CAPACITY 300 Um2

- complet,ely weathered rock ard rock can be identified as it offers complete refusals to bucket excavators.

settlement of foundations will be less than 12mm. Modulus of subgrade reactions

Um3 and 4000 Um3 can be utilized for design of foundations installed on completely

rock and hard rock respectively. Excavation sides should be sloped at a

slope of 1:'1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter up to CWR and 1:2 (horizontal:

below this depth.

tests can be conducted to determine whether higher bearing capacities are

any location.

t iPERFECT-} GECTECHNICS

I

samples were collected for chemical analysis from the site. Results of

analysis are enclosed in the Annexure. Based on chemical results, the site falls

Class I for sulphates and chlorides (As per 15456-2000 and as per CIRIA Special

No. 31). A 'Moderate' exposure condition was assigned to this site. Hence,

precautions shall be taken to protect concrete and reinforcement in foundations;

7 I : I I I i ! a T.O FIELD EIPLqRArtOfl PRO(EDURES I I I Ia sub-surface investigation was completed generally as per lS: lggz-1979. The fleld

was carried out using a rotary machine. Casing was used to support sides of

until sufficiently stiff strata was encountered. Standard penetration Tests (i.e. Spr)

carried out in soil in accordance with ls 2131-1g81. Using this procedure, a 2" outside

splilbarrel sampler is driven into the soil by 63.5 kg. weight falling through 75 cm

After an initial set of 15cm, the number of blows required to drive the sampler an

30 cm, is known as the "penetration resistance" or "N value',.

sPT refusal was obtained in hard strata, rock coring was done using diamond bit and

fube core banel to obtain rock samples. Percent Rock Core Recovery and Rock

Designation (%ROD) were determined. Yo ReD = 100 x Sum of length of rock

in cms, each having lengths greater than 10cms;/Total length of core run.

GEOTECHNICS-T-- PVT. LTD.

Wagh ., P.E. (Geotechnical) Ann<*ra<- f9 *ornen{- PO[UER

TPL/CS/Gen/01-18/01

1 1 -Jan-2018

Mls. Ajitnath Hi-Tech Builders Pvt. Ltcl. I-odha Excelus, N. M. Joshi Marg, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai-4O0 011

Sttb: Certificate of adequacy of powel srrpply to your proposed integrated residential township pro.lect at village All.lrrr, Mankofi arrd Strrai, Taluka-Bhiwandi, District-Thane

Ref: 1) Your lettel dated 04.10.2{).1(, 2) TPL lelter no. TpL/CS/Ger.r! tO-j6122 rjatecl 18.10.20i6 3) Your lelter dated 21.10.20.1(i -lPL 4) letter no. TpL/CS/Gerrl l0_.t0/30 tlated 27.10.2016 5) Your letter dated 28.12.201 /

Dear Sir,

This is with reference to the above le(ters and discussion with your officials on the sub1ect mattejt. As informed yott, by we nole that the proposed Township project would have a load requirement of 48 MVA.

we are glad provicre you to the in-principre certificate of adequacy of power suppry to this integrated residential townshilr projccl at villager Anjur, Mankoli and surai, Taluka-Bhiwandi, District-Thane.

Thls. approval is, subject to the harrtlinq ov(:r o[ lhe land required for the EHV sub-station, establishment of the EHV sttll-statiori artrl creal.iorr of aclecluate infrastructure under DDF as per the standard norrns of MSEDCI.. ancl Mlll_TCL respectively.

We asstrre yorr of best o[ our services.

Yours sincerely, t"*, d' General Manager (Custorner Services)

TORRENT POWER LIMITED CIN : Ll | 20OGJ2004pl^C0.4 4069 Otd phara, Agra Road. Arrjur Bhiwandi _ 421102, phonc : 02522-24t900 tlcgd'oltice : "samanvay", 600 Tapovan, Ambewacii, Ahmedabacj - lB00l5. lndia. phone:.t-91 79 2662 Bo0o www_ron.entpowercom Ann.*n+.--

I

TPUCS/Gen/10- 16/30

27.10.2015

Shri Abhrlii Thanrval Deputy Manager Liaison M/s Ajitnath Hi-Tech Buitders pvl Ltd. Lodha Excelus, N M Joshi Marg, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai 400 011 Ph No: 9833654369

power Sub: Consent for supply of to proposed Township project by Ajitnath Hi-Tech pvt Buirders Ltd at vilage Anjur, Mankori and Surai in Bhiwandi . Circle Ref: 1. Your letter dated 04.10.2016 2. Our letter no. TPUCS/Ge ntlA-1Et2Z dated 18.10.2016 3. Your lefter dated 21..10.2016

Dear Sir,

This is with reference to above reterred retters and in continuation to site visit and discussion with your officiars. note that the township prolect wourd have requiremeni _.we a road of 48 MVA in the first phase over the next 2 io 3 years.

We are glad to provide our in-principle consent for supply of power to your projecl at th-e referred site, provided you that make provision oi adequate infrastructure under DDF as per the standard norms of MSETCT_ anO fvf SEOCi respectivety.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely. .n,l IV Manager (Customer Services) AnnL*,r* - L

6giilq : ?ni,,_.r::Fi, AI.ft.ri*, fr..AIU) S.eftrnlEnrld srft{s

R.o{ I gzhogts

ErErf,r

qrqdqr-{d ql.r6Hr qrq oq{ qrqdT toqTd r}d ot, t 3Tfud-{p{ erq }fi M qiqT etBqRN qqle srgc qqrqd rqtfr nisqrfr y$fr6iq .q6d sidgf, ffi Hrsi.srcq lrisqnft gt{-6inr q-{FCn-E-{ gE< ffi 3Tftt-fi wot e-{r ilq.inq( rrt i'zs, tt/s, 18/1, 1s,/6, q o+ qka 3lmffi !-Sa qftftr+fto sirsFqT RmrTmdi ffiq-{dT stcqftErf, E fi +d s]G. lTil qlo-qrzlr srw 6l w{d}'dT{ zFlEqrfl t-$d.il$q T rqrfti{ gil tr-(rfi-qifl€ sfql dlq r'qi-.{r tfi=.riqrflr& ftT n-{-d

drzTd{MF -arcaid m.fttiS. kai Annc*r rr< -Xl LODHA Date:16.01.2018

To, Medical Health Officer Bhiwandi Nizampur Muncipal Corporation, Thane, Maharashtra

Sub: Certificate of adequacy to cater to the solid waste generated from our proposed Integrated Township at Village Aniur, Mankoli & Surai, Taluka Bhiwandi, Dist. Thane. Attachments: Annexure I : Minutes of 25s EAC (lnfra-llJ meeting held on 29.1,7.2017 (ltem no. 25.3.72) Respected Sir, This letter is to appraise your good office with the Bio degradable and non- biodegradable wastes generated from the proposed proiect and take required No Objection Certificate for the proposed integrated residential township project at village Anjur, Mankoli, & Surai Taluka Bhiwandi Dist Thane, Maharashtra.

ln our proposed project, total estimated quantity is around 44 Tonnes/Day solid waste will be generated in the project. The biodegradable waste (26 Tons/day) will be processed in Bio methanation Plant and non-biodegradable waste of 17 Tonnes/Day, out of which the recyclable waste will be handed over to reputed recyclers. We envisage inert wastes comprising of mud, silt, grit, construction debris as per SWM Rules 2016 or as per environmental laws of the land prevalent at the time of setting up of the project. We will be transferring the inert wastes, assumed 20o/o of total solid waste, through your authorized vendors / vehicles only for disposal.

Taking above information in to consideration we request your good office to issue a no objection certificate for disposing non bio degradable inert waste through your authorized vendors.

ln addition to this, In the Expert Appraisal Committee (lnfra-2) meeting held on 29.77.207, minutes of meeting attached herewith as Annexure - l, freference Item no. 25.03.2072 of the minutesJ, we were asked to provide the existing civic capacities of handling of municipal solid wastes by the local body & hence request you to share this information.

Thanking you, Yours faithtully, FOR TH HI-TECH BUILDERS PVT LTD.

As mentioned above

Lodha O6velop.!: Lodha Excetus N M JoshiMarg. Mahalaxmt. Mumbai4OO0tl lndta.l -9t 22 67737373. F +9t 22 23OO O6q, Lodha D6v6lop6B UK Ltd.: 3IJarnes.s Squarc. London SWly4JU. UK. T +44 m 7m4 0900. F -44 20 7004 m01 www.lodhagroup com