“So Many Russians! Where Will We Bury Them All?”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“So Many Russians! Where Will We Bury Them All?” “So many Russians! Where will we bury them all?” The Winter War By Richard P. Hallion Photo courtesy of Air Force Historical Research Agency, via Richard P. Hallion t the end of the 1930s, the USSR—then set his gaze upon Finland. an excellent Finnish-made submachine Soviet Union’s Krasnaya Finland, a nation of 3.7 million gun, giving them withering close-combat Armiya (Red Army) em- confronting one more than 40 times firepower. bodied Stalin’s military larger, seemed doomed—particularly Finland’s “Mannerheim Line”— strength. It had five mil- since years of political indifference, named after Field Marshal Carl Gustaf Alion troops, more than 300 divisions, a questionable acquisition priorities, Mannerheim—defending the Karelian formidable reserve, and included the and complacency had left its military Isthmus was simply coils of barbed Voenno-Vozdushnye Sily (VVS), the undersized, underfunded, and poorly wire, some obstructions, and occasional Air Force. It seemed invincible, and equipped. machine gun nests connecting lakes Defense Commissar Kliment Voroshilov and marshes. As its namesake soberly even said so to delegates at the 1939 A Drawn-out Slugfest reflected, “The Mannerheim Line is the Party Congress. The Red Army had more than one Finnish soldier standing in the snow.” In August 1939, Stalin and Hitler million soldiers already deployed on its Yet the fiercely patriotic Finns re- executed a nonaggression pact es- borders; Finland, prior to mobilization, fused to give in. “So many Russians! sentially giving Stalin a free hand in had just 33,000. The VVS and Soviet Where will we bury them all?” one the Baltic States and Bessarabia, the Navy deployed 2,300 aircraft; the Finns soldier quipped. His jest soon proved region around modern-day Moldova had just 114. grimly prophetic. encompassing parts of Ukraine and Finnish troops had several months’ Stalin launched all-out war on Nov. Romania. Stalin wrung concessions worth of ammunition, some czarist- 30, 1939. The Red Army assaulted the from Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—a legacy artillery, and few tanks or heavy Mannerheim Line, also invading cen- prelude to absorbing them later into the machine guns. Fortunately, they wielded tral Finland to sever supply lines from 112 AIR FORCE Magazine / September 2012 Soviet paratroopers tumble out of a Tu- polev TB-3. Finland shot down at least one of the transport-bomber aircraft early in the war, along with dozens of other bombers. Photo courtesy of Air Force Historical Research Agency, via Richard P. Hallion Staff map by Zaur Eylanbekov Sweden. The Soviet Navy prowled the an airplane marked with his personal bombers and two more Dutch Fokker coast. Aloft, VVS fighters and bombers good luck symbol, a blue swastika. It D.XXI fighters. But it needed more struck at ports, cities, and installations. became the official Finnish air emblem fighters. The Finnish Air Chief was But the offensive quickly degener- (but had no connection to the Nazis’ Jarl F. Lundqvist, an artillery officer ated into a drawn-out slugfest, with the later use of the symbol). turned air commander. His predilection thrust into central Finland ending in a In 1928, the air service became the for bombers and maritime patrol con- grim landscape of abandoned vehicles Ilmavoimat, the Air Force. But it was strained Finnish fighter modernization and frozen, snow-covered corpses. inadequately supported by the Army and at a time when world fighter design was Everywhere white-clad Finnish snipers Navy traditionalists who dominated the evolving rapidly. took a deadly toll, as did ski troops, at- general staff and who selected Army- and Frustrated fighter advocates saw nu- tacking swiftly out of the woods with maritime-centric leaders to run it. On the merous opportunities missed to secure submachine guns, grenades, and tank- positive side, Finnish airmen became better, more advanced, aircraft that, destroying Molotov cocktails. Stalin’s masters of making do, operating under in retrospect, could have dramatically Navy suffered from coastal artillery, its rough conditions, even in the frozen tun- affected the Winter War. landing attempts repulsed. dra and wastes of the high Arctic. They Thus, in 1940, the obsolete Fokkers But nowhere did the Finns fight more developed portable shelters and heating constituted the front line of Finnish air tenaciously than in the air. for exposed aircraft; mobile logistical defense, even though they only had Finland established an air service in support to enable austere operations; an armament of four 7.9 mm machine 1918, when a group of adventurers joined and thorough unit-level maintenance. guns and a maximum speed of just its fight against the Bolsheviks. One of In 1936 Finland purchased two 286 mph. Still, they were fast enough them, Sweden’s Eric von Rosen, donated squadrons of British Bristol Blenheim to intercept most bombers and were AIR FORCE Magazine / September 2012 113 When the war began, Finland had 18 Bristol Blenheim light bombers, such as this one at Immola. Finland marked its military aircraft with blue swastikas, a good luck symbol. There was no connection to Nazi Germany’s ubiquitous use Photo courtesy of MikkoVeijalainen, Military Aviation Museum of Central Finland, via Hallion Richard P. of the ancient symbol. potentially deadly opponents if flown prepared caches of supplies and am- by skilled pilots. munition and loaded trucks with spare Finland’s fighter pilots were superbly parts, tools, and other necessities. trained, thanks to Lt. Col. Richard “Our esprit de corps was high despite Julius Lorentz and Capt. Gustaf Erik the fact that we would be up against Magnusson. In the early 1930s, Lorentz heavy odds,” ace Ilmari Juutilainen commanded Lentolaivue 24 (LeLv 24), recalled later. “We were ready.” Finland’s premier fighter squadron. It Russia’s Air Force outnumbered Fin- was a time when his pilots took pride land’s by 20 to one. The Soviet Union in flying a tight three-ship Royal Air deployed 2,318 aircraft, including 1,044 Force-inspired V-shaped arrowhead. fighters and 855 bombers. The Soviets But Lorentz realized it limited effec- had 395 others for strategic bombing, tiveness and increased vulnerability. paratroop insertion, reconnaissance, artillery observation, and maritime pa- Setting the Stage for Defense trol. In contrast, Finland’s 114 aircraft Instead, he made an element of two included 42 Fokkers, 15 older Bulldogs, fighters, leader and wingman, the basic formation. He stressed mutual protec- tion, gunnery, use of radio in aircraft and ground observer networks, and exploiting signals intelligence. His initiatives created a crude command Col. Richard Lorentz (above) and Maj. and control system, with radar being Gustaf Magnusson (right) readied and trained a cadre of superb Finnish pilots unavailable to Finland at the time of the who fought tenaciously in the air de- Winter War. As well, he encapsulated spite being greatly outnumbered. his thinking in an air war manual is- sued in 1939. advocated beam and stern attacks, “Eka” Magnusson, one of Lorentz’s deflection shooting, and firing at short flight commanders, was so interested range, targeting gunners first, and then in tactics that he traveled at his own engines and pilots. expense to fly with France’s l’Armée Magnusson pitted his Fokkers against de l’Air. He returned impressed by its each other and against older but more use of gun cameras for analysis and by nimble Bristol Bulldog biplanes. It was the extensive critique following each excellent preparation: The Fokker pilots training mission. learned not to attempt turning fights In 1938, now himself commanding against biplanes such as the Polikarpov LeLv 24, he visited Germany. Magnus- I-15bis and I-153. son returned convinced Europe was at In the fall of 1939, as Soviet recon- best a year away from war. He exercised naissance incursions increased, Lorentz LeLv 24 hard, emphasizing tactics, (newly appointed as commander of marksmanship, and maintenance. He fighters) dispersed his aircraft. Teams 114 AIR FORCE Magazine / September 2012 A Polikarpov I-15bis sports a “For Stalin!” slogan on its flank. The biplanes were deadly foes in turn- ing fights, but the Finns knew how to avoid that sort of battle. Photo courtesy of George Mellinger Collection, via Hallion Richard P. and 18 Blenheims. one bomber down. tools warm. On Nov. 30, amidst bad weather that The remainder were attacked by 1st Accidents caused by fatigue—for shielded Stalin’s airmen from Finnish Lt. Jorma Sarvanto. In just four minutes, pilots flew up to eight sorties each interception, eight bombers set out to Sarvanto shot down six. The seventh day—constituted as much a danger as raid port and oil storage facilities near Soviet bomber then fell to Sovelius, Soviet fighters and anti-aircraft fire. By Helsinki. But they missed their targets who caught it as it crossed the coast. the end of January, LeLv 24 had only 28 and instead dropped bombs across the On Jan. 17, the Finns intercepted 25 mission-capable Fokkers left. city, killing almost 100 Finns—and Tupolev SBs over Karelia, shooting Fortunately, diplomatic efforts to triggering international outrage. down nine and damaging several oth- secure additional airplanes were now The next day, when more returned, ers. Three days later, they shot down a bearing fruit. Arriving aircraft were they ran into a swarm of Fokkers led by further nine, at the cost of one Fokker assembled in Sweden, and a total of Magnusson. The angry Finns swiftly shot and pilot lost to a pair of I-16s. 116 aircraft were readied by the end down 11 Soviet bombers, one falling Altogether, in the month of January of March. before Magnusson’s own guns. 1940, Finland’s Fokkers shot down 34 Britain sent 30 Gloster Gladiator That encounter established a pattern Soviet aircraft, primarily bombers. biplanes, the French supplied 30 Mo- for the subsequent air war.
Recommended publications
  • Vuoksenniska
    VUOKSENNISKA Vuoksenniskan asuin- ja koulualue on rakennettu mannerjäätikön reunaan Vuoksenniska’s residential and school area is built on the First Salpausselkä kerrostuneen Ensimmäisen Salpausselän päälle. Vuoksenniskalta länteen päin formation, deposited along the margin of the continental ice sheet. West of the Salpausselkä kulkee koko Etelä-Suomen halki ja sukeltaa Hankoniemen kärjessä Vuoksenniska, the Salpausselkä runs across the whole of Southern Finland and Itämeren aaltoihin. Salpausselkää vastaava reunamuodostuma jatkuu katkonaisena dives into the Baltic Sea at the tip of the headland of Hankoniemi. An ice-marginal Ruotsiin, Pohjois-Norjaan ja edelleen Venäjälle, mistä se koukkaa Pohjois-Karjalan formation similar to Salpausselkä, although more broken, continues to Sweden and kautta takaisin Vuoksenniskalle. Muodostumaketju sulkee siis sisäänsä koko Northern Norway and to Russia, circling back to Vuoksenniska through Northern Fennoskandian ja osoittaa tarkalleen muinaisen mannerjäätikön laajuuden runsaat Karelia. This chain of land formations encloses the whole of Fennoscandia, and 12 000 vuotta sitten. Saimaan lasku-uoma Vuoksi puhkaisi aukon renkaaseen outlines the precise extent of the continental ice sheet of 12,000 years ago. The 5 700 vuotta sitten Vuoksenniskalla, reunamuodostuman hiekkavaltaisen osan River Vuoksi, Saimaa’s outlet, pierced a hole in this circle through the lowest sand- matalimpaan kohtaan. Vuoksenniska sijaitsee siis geologisten suurmuotojen filled part of the Vuoksenniska’s ice-marginal formation 5,700
    [Show full text]
  • Communiqué De Presse
    Paris, 6th June 2017 PRESS RELEASE First Flight of Russian Aircraft MC-21 Nexeya supplies avionics integration and simulation tools Russia United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) successfully completed the maiden flight of their new MC-21- 300 commercial aircraft at Irkutsk Aviation Plant airfield. Being a modern aircraft, the MC-21 operates with numerous state of the art computer-controlled systems supporting safety-critical flight functions. While this may have been the first time its complex avionics systems have been tested in flight, they have been successfully integrated and tested on the ground thanks to TechSAT’s Avionics Development System ADS2 platform solution. This ADS2 platform enabled UAC Integration Center to test and validate the full MC-21 avionic suits prior to the first flight. Holistic tests including complex operational scenarios were performed during every phases of the design and development of the program ensuring maximum safety and superior performance of the aircraft. TechSAT (a Nexeya company) is proud to be part of the MC-21 program. «TechSAT solutions were designed and built on schedule; all test rigs were thus completed on time», says Victor SINITSYN, head of section at the UAC Integration Center. «ADS2 is a powerful, flexible, and stable product, to perform all required tests. ADS2 keeps its promises. ADS2 functionality is 100% reliable. TechSAT teams are open and skilled to meet customer needs». Marco Häde, TechSAT director of operations : «The key feature of TechSAT’s solutions for MC-21 simulation systems is the integration of all LRUs involved and the cockpit into a real hardware-in-the-loop setup.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
    [Show full text]
  • Saab HX Media Brief at Kauhava, Finland
    SAAB HX UPDATE IN CONJUNCTION TO THE KAUHAVA AIRSHOW MEDIA BRIEF, KAUHAVA, FINLAND On site and live broadcast, August 28th 2020 11:30-12:30 (GMT+2) Welcome and introductions Anders Gardberg Country Manager, Finland 2 Agenda • Welcome and introduction Anders Gardberg, Country Manager Finland • CEO perspectives Micael Johansson, President and CEO of Saab • Saab and the HX programme Magnus Skogberg, Campaign Director HX • Gripen and GlobalEye for Finland • A Swedish Air Force perspective Col. Carl-Fredrik Edström, Chief Operations, Swedish Air Force • on Gripen and Finnish-Swedish cooperation • Concluding words and questions • End of press briefing at 12:30 After-talk and guided live-tour at Kauhava Airshow offered to our on-line viewers 3 Saab started in 1937 with the aim to ensure Security of Supply… 4 …also supporting Finland in the Winter War with the assembly of Brewster and Fiat fighters… 5 Saab’s broad portfolio 6 Continuing from 1946, supporting Finnish Defence Forces with high- tech products for all services … 7 Saab in Finland today • Growing from 70 to 130 employees since 2015, recruitments ongoing • Saab Finland Oy Helsinki, Tampere, Turku 40 employees • Combitech Oy, Tampere, Espoo, Jyväskylä, Säkylä 90 employees • Strategic research co-operation with Aalto University since 2017 • Long term research - advanced electronics, microwave technology, AI, hydro-acoustics • Technology Centre, Tampere – part of Saab’s global R&D organization • Competence centre for advanced EW capabilities • C2/9LV System Centre being established as
    [Show full text]
  • Rafale for Finland
    This document is not contractual and cannot engage the responsibility of the industrial partners in any matter. The industrial partners reserve the right to modify any herein indicated characteristics without prior notice. – © Photos: Dassault Aviation, A. Pecchi, V. Almansa, T. Hynynen, R. Skorzus, Sirpa Air, istock – Print: DBPrint 2020. FINLAND RAFALE FOR RAFALE FOR FINLAND A Weapon System with perfect Capability for Finnish Air Force operational requirements and Finland’s Sovereignty, ensuring a strong, credible, reliable and preventive Defence solution. The RAFALE concept makes it possible for one man, in one aircraft, to become a multi-task asset in the hands of its Commander. Integrated in the Joint C4 environment of Finnish Defence Forces, RAFALE is a true force multiplier, demonstrating everyday its capability to operate in highly contested environment theatres, with its perfect mix of capabilities. RAFALE for Finland is tailored to the Finnish environment. A low-risk program, at an affordable and secured Life Cycle Cost for the decades of service in the Finnish Air Force. RAFALE offers constantly enhanced capabilities with improved technologies, and additional features, to combat new emerging threats and meet Customer needs. A European Weapon system to uphold Finnish national ambition. The deepening European defence cooperation needs constructive and long-term visions and planning for which Finland and France share a common interest. Finnish-French cooperation is highly regarded, symbolized by high-level meetings during the last years. Finland joining the European Intervention Initiative and signing the new Framework Paper on Bilateral Defence Co-operation are important steps and give a good base for deepening the cooperation between our countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Military Thinking and Threat Perception: a Finnish View
    CERI STRATEGY PAPERS N° 5 – Séminaire Stratégique du 13 novembre 2009 Russian Military Thinking and Threat Perception: A Finnish View Dr. Stefan FORSS The author is a Finnish physicist working as Senior Researcher at the Unit of Policy Planning and Research at the Ministry for Foreign Affairs and as Adjunct Professor at the Department of Strategic and Defence Studies at the National Defence University in Helsinki. The views expressed are his own. Introduction “The three main security challenges for Finland today are Russia, Russia and Russia. And not only for Finland, but for all of us.”1 This quote is from a speech by Finnish Minister of Defence Jyri Häkämies in Washington in September 2007. His remarks were immediately strongly criticised as inappropriate and it was pointed out that his view didn’t represent the official position of the Finnish Government. Mr. Häkämies seemed, however, to gain in credibility a month later, when a senior Russian diplomat gave a strongly worded presentation about the security threats in the Baltic Sea area in a seminar organised by the Finnish National Defence University and later appeared several times on Finnish television.2 The message sent was that Finnish membership in NATO would be perceived as a military threat to Russia. This peculiar episode caused cold shivers, as it reminded us of unpleasant experiences during the post-war period. The Russian military force build-up and the war in Georgia in August 2008 was the ultimate confirmation for all of Russia’s neighbours, that the Soviet-style mindset is not a thing of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Forces Flight 2011/2012 International
    SPECIAL REPORT WORLD AIR FORCES FLIGHT 2011/2012 INTERNATIONAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH Secure your availability. Rely on our performance. Aircraft availability on the flight line is more than ever essential for the Air Force mission fulfilment. Cooperating with the right industrial partner is of strategic importance and key to improving Air Force logistics and supply chain management. RUAG provides you with new options to resource your mission. More than 40 years of flight line management make us the experienced and capable partner we are – a partner you can rely on. RUAG Aviation Military Aviation · Seetalstrasse 175 · P.O. Box 301 · 6032 Emmen · Switzerland Legal domicile: RUAG Switzerland Ltd · Seetalstrasse 175 · P.O. Box 301 · 6032 Emmen Tel. +41 41 268 41 11 · Fax +41 41 260 25 88 · [email protected] · www.ruag.com WORLD AIR FORCES 2011/2012 CONTENT ANALYSIS 4 Worldwide active fleet per region 5 Worldwide active fleet share per country 6 Worldwide top 10 active aircraft types 8 WORLD AIR FORCES World Air Forces directory 9 TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT FLIGHTGLOBAL INSIGHT AND REPORT SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES, CONTACT: Flightglobal Insight Quadrant House, The Quadrant Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5AS, UK Tel: + 44 208 652 8724 Email:LQVLJKW#ÁLJKWJOREDOFRP Website: ZZZÁLJKWJOREDOFRPLQVLJKt World Air Forces 2011/2012 | Flightglobal Insight | 3 WORLD AIR FORCES 2011/2012 The French and Qatari air forces deployed Mirage 2000-5s for the fight over Libya JOINT RESPONSE Air arms around the world reacted to multiple challenges during 2011, despite fleet and budget cuts. We list the current inventories and procurement plans of 160 nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing World
    Romanesque style, celebrated for author of “School and and Society” Letters to Vbe Stef simplicity and dignity. Modern “Art as Experience,” and his elder The Star ' E4iti®». Says Dewey Impresses I Wttk »n4ty Mwafau restoration has hurt yet not spoiled brother, Davis Rich Dewey (1888- Interruption of Hoover Address This World tr them. "The It has been de- Changing THEODORE W. Editor. one," writer of stand- Newsmen NOYES. 1842), economist, a Listener C Favorably clared, "is the in stone of Deplored by By onstontin* Brown D. C. expression ard “financial History of the United WASHINGTON,- To the editor of The Star: The Germans cannot afford to have President Ryti and his followers sus- Candidate Passed His First Test the imperial will of the conquering States” and “Banking and Credit.” It Irtaini Star Newspaper Company. The Republican convention in Russia firmly established in the Baltic pected under these circumstances they at Press Writer Duke, the other breathes the true The Chicago Parley, Says Main Office: 11th Ot. and Pennsylvania Are. Upper New York State extension now is What Sea and have informM the Finnish would be forced out and a Hew York Office: 110 Cast 43d St. history. additional chap- replaced by _ spirit of his and faithful are cabinet to David Lawrence Chicago Office: 435 North Michigan Are. loving of the tribe brought forth Charles ters are added to the book will be dic- government that they going to fight "friendly” Moscow. By Duchess.” Many pictures illustrat- Melville the Russians in that area. While these matters were being pon- CHICAGO, July 1.—National con- DoUvciwd by Carrier—Metropolitan Area.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Ranks and Units
    US Military Ranks and Units Modern US Military Ranks The table shows current ranks in the US military service branches, but they can serve as a fair guide throughout the twentieth century. Ranks in foreign military services may vary significantly, even when the same names are used. Many European countries use the rank Field Marshal, for example, which is not used in the United States. Pay Army Air Force Marines Navy and Coast Guard Scale Commissioned Officers General of the ** General of the Air Force Fleet Admiral Army Chief of Naval Operations Army Chief of Commandant of the Air Force Chief of Staff Staff Marine Corps O-10 Commandant of the Coast General Guard General General Admiral O-9 Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Rear Admiral O-8 Major General Major General Major General (Upper Half) Rear Admiral O-7 Brigadier General Brigadier General Brigadier General (Commodore) O-6 Colonel Colonel Colonel Captain O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Commander O-4 Major Major Major Lieutenant Commander O-3 Captain Captain Captain Lieutenant O-2 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant, Junior Grade O-1 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant Ensign Warrant Officers Master Warrant W-5 Chief Warrant Officer 5 Master Warrant Officer Officer 5 W-4 Warrant Officer 4 Chief Warrant Officer 4 Warrant Officer 4 W-3 Warrant Officer 3 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Warrant Officer 3 W-2 Warrant Officer 2 Chief Warrant Officer 2 Warrant Officer 2 W-1 Warrant Officer 1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer 1 Blank indicates there is no rank at that pay grade.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Quick Guide for the IL76
    Ilyushin IL-76 About the airplane: 1 Country of origin: Russia Powerplants: 4 x 117.7kN (26,455 lb) Aviadvigatel Soloviev D30KP turbofans. The IL-76MF is powered by 4 x 156.9kN (35,275 lb) Aviadvigatel PS90ANs. Performance: IL-76T - Max speed 850km/h (460 kts), cruising speed 750 to 800 km/h (405 to 430 kts). Max range with reserves 6700 km (3615 nm), range with 40 ton (88,185 lb) payload 5000 km (2700 nm). IL-76TD - Speeds same. Range with max payload 3650 km (1970 nm), with 20 ton (44,090 lb) payload 7300 km (3940 nm). IL-76MF - Cruising speed range 750 to 780 km/h (405 to 420 kts). Range with 40 ton (88,185 lb) payload 5200 km (2805 nm). Weights: lL-76T - Max takeoff weight: 170,000 kg (374,785 lb). IL-76TD - Max takeoff weight: 190,000 kg (418,875 lb). IL-76MF - Operating empty weight: 101,000 kg (222,665 lb), max payload: 52,000kg (114,640 lb), max takeoff weight: 200,000 kg (440,925 lb). Dimensions: Wing span: 50.50 m (165ft 8 in), length: 46.59 m (152 ft 10 in), height: 14.76m (48 ft 5 in). Wing area: 300.0 m2 (3229.2 ft2). Il-76MF - Same except for length which is approx. 53 m (174 ft). Capacity: Flight crew of five members including two pilots, flight engineer, navigator and radio operator, plus two freight handlers. IL-76MP firefighting conversion can carry 44 ton (97,000lb) of fire retardant in two tanks. Production: Over 900 IL-76s of all models built, most for the Russian military, but over 300 are in service with Aeroflot and other civilian operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Short Courses Catalog
    AEROSPACE S HORT COU R S E S SPRING 2021 – SPRING 2022 Get ready for this year’s projects, refresh your knowledge and skills, earn a certificate and advance your career. Online Courses • Spring 2022 Schedule Free History of Airplane Design Webinars DEAR COLLEAGUES, LET OUR TEAM TRAIN travel costs and receive professional We hope this development uniquely tailored to YOUR TEAM ONLINE. message finds your team’s schedule and needs. you well. While You can learn where you work, take the last year has advantage of flexible delivery, train KU’sAerospaceShortCourse brought changes more people for less, or meet specific Programdeliversdependable and challenges, needs for small groups of employees. professionaltrainingwhere we know your need for KU Aerospace Short Courses stands youare.Trainasmallgroupor relevant, quality ready to meet your training needs, largeteamwithonlineshort professional training remains as whatever they may be. Whether coursesdeliveredrighttoyour necessary as ever. KU Aerospace you plan to attend a public course, organizationbyourexpert Short Courses remains committed want to register for a scheduled instructors.Selectthetopics to providing valuable, relevant course offering or engage your team professional development that meets in online learning right from their yourteamneedsmostandtake your needs. desks, visit our page at LPE.ku.edu/ advantageofflexiblescheduling aero-short-courses-home for a full thatreducestimeawayfrom Aerospace learning and instruction listing of available programs. work. is ongoing through a variety of platforms in 2021. In addition to our Rock Chalk, scheduled public courses this year in Why bring online learning to San Diego and Orlando, you can take your business? advantage of more online Aerospace Short Courses and free webinars than Sharon Graham •Competitivepricing ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • The Image of Marshal Mannerheim, Moral Panic, and the Refashioning of the Nation in the 1990S
    CHAPTER 14 The Image of Marshal Mannerheim, Moral Panic, and the Refashioning of the Nation in the 1990s Tuomas Tepora INTRODUCTION The end of the Cold War resulted in radical changes in Finland’s interna- tional position and economy. It sparked an identity struggle, seen within society as soul-searching. One of the major national symbolic fgures, Marshal Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim (1867–1951), the Civil War (1918) and World War II military leader and the President of Finland (1944–1946), became a mirror in this collective introspection. This chap- ter addresses the personality cult surrounding Marshal Mannerheim, as well as the alternating images of him, as keys to understanding the emo- tional and social upheavals within Finnish society in the early 1990s. The chapter focuses on the debate in the early 1990s concerning the construction of the Museum of Contemporary Art next to the Mannerheim T. Tepora (*) University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2021 349 V. Kivimäki et al. (eds.), Lived Nation as the History of Experiences and Emotions in Finland, 1800–2000, Palgrave Studies in the History of Experience, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69882-9_14 350 T. TEPORA equestrian statue at the heart of Helsinki. The debate offers invaluable insight into the emotional memory politics, the layers of memories, and future expectations in the post-Cold War nation. In the early 1990s, the Mannerheim statue and contemporary art formed an oxymoron that seemed to threaten the moral base of the nation. The juxtaposition sym- bolized a moral panic that concerned the lived experience of Finland’s changing international position.
    [Show full text]