The Barnacle Historic State Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Barnacle Historic State Park THE BARNACLE HISTORIC STATE PARK APPROVED Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 7 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 7 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................... 8 Public Participation ..............................................................................8 Other Designations .............................................................................9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 12 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 12 Topography .................................................................................. 12 Geology ....................................................................................... 12 Soils ............................................................................................ 12 Minerals ....................................................................................... 17 Hydrology .................................................................................... 17 Natural Communities (FNAI) ........................................................... 17 Imperiled Species ......................................................................... 24 Exotic and Nuisance Species ........................................................... 27 Special Natural Features ............................................................... 30 Cultural Resources ............................................................................ 30 Condition Assessment .................................................................... 30 Level of Significance ...................................................................... 30 Prehistoric and Historic Archaeological Sites ..................................... 31 Historic Structures ........................................................................ 31 Collections ................................................................................... 34 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ................................................. 37 Management Goals, Objectives and Actions .......................................... 37 Natural Resource Management ........................................................... 37 Hydrological Management .............................................................. 37 Natural Communities Management .................................................. 38 Imperiled Species Management ...................................................... 38 Exotic Species Management ........................................................... 39 Cultural Resource Management .......................................................... 40 Special Management Considerations .................................................... 43 Timber Management Analysis ......................................................... 43 Coastal /Beach Management .......................................................... 43 Arthropod Control Plan ................................................................... 43 Sea Level Rise .............................................................................. 44 i Resource Management Schedule ......................................................... 44 Land Management Review ................................................................. 44 LAND USE COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 45 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS .................................................................... 45 Existing Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 47 Planned Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 47 Florida Greenways and Trails System .................................................. 48 PROPERTY ANALYSIS ........................................................................ 48 Recreation Resource Elements ............................................................ 48 Land Area .................................................................................... 48 Shoreline ..................................................................................... 49 Natural Scenery ............................................................................ 49 Archaeological and Historic Features ................................................ 49 Assessment of Use ............................................................................ 49 Past Uses ..................................................................................... 49 Future Land Use and Zoning ........................................................... 50 Current Recreation Use and Visitor Programs .................................... 50 Other Uses ................................................................................... 50 Protected Zones ............................................................................ 53 Existing Facilities .............................................................................. 53 Recreation Facilities .......................................................................... 53 Support Facilities .............................................................................. 53 CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN ........................................................... 53 Potential Uses .................................................................................. 54 Public Access and Recreational Opportunities .................................... 54 Proposed Facilities ............................................................................ 57 Capital Facilities and Infrastructure ................................................. 57 Facilities Development ....................................................................... 58 Recreational Carrying Capacity ........................................................... 59 Optimum Boundary ........................................................................... 60 IMPLEMENTATION COMPONENT MANAGEMENT PROGRESS .................................................................. 61 Acquisition ....................................................................................... 61 Park Administration and Operations .................................................... 61 Resource Management ...................................................................... 61 Natural Resources ..................................................................... 61 Cultural Resources ..................................................................... 61 Recreation and Visitor Services ........................................................... 62 Park Facilities ................................................................................... 62 MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ............................................ 63 ii TABLES TABLE 1 – The Barnacle Historic State Park Management Zones ................ 12 TABLE 2 – Imperiled Species Inventory .................................................. 25 TABLE 3 – Inventory of FLEPPC Category I and II Exotic Plant Species ....... 28 TABLE 4 – Cultural Sites Listed in the Florida Master Site File ................... 36 TABLE 5 – Recreational Carrying Capacity .............................................. 60 TABLE 6 – Implementation Schedule and Cost Estimates.......................... 65 MAPS Vicinity Map ...........................................................................................3 Reference Map .......................................................................................5 Management Zones Map........................................................................ 13 Soils Map ............................................................................................ 15 Natural Communities Map ...................................................................... 19 Base Map ............................................................................................ 51 Conceptual Land Use Plan ...................................................................... 55 LIST OF ADDENDA ADDENDUM 1 Acquisition History ....................................................................... A 1 - 1 ADDENDUM 2 Advisory Group Members and Report ............................................. A 2 - 1 ADDENDUM 3 References Cited ......................................................................... A 3 - 1 ADDENDUM 4 Soil Descriptions ......................................................................... A 4 - 1 ADDENDUM 5 Plant and Animal List ................................................................... A 5 - 1 ADDENDUM 6 Imperiled Species Ranking Definitions ............................................ A 6 - 1 ADDENDUM 7 Cultural Information ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Everglades Biographies Everglades Biographies
    Everglades Digital Library Guide to Collection Everglades Timeline Everglades Biographies Everglades Biographies Research Help Everglades Librarian Ordering Reproductions Copyright Credits Home Search the Expanded Collection Browse the Expanded Collection Bowman F. Ashe James Edmundson Ingraham Ivar Axelson James Franklin Jaudon Mary McDougal Axelson May Mann Jennings Access the Original Richard J. Bolles Claude Carson Matlack Collection at Chief Billy Bowlegs Daniel A. McDougal Guy Bradley Minnie Moore-Willson Napoleon Bonaparte Broward Frederick S. Morse James Milton Carson Mary Barr Munroe Ernest F. Coe Ralph Middleton Munroe Barron G. Collier Ruth Bryan Owen Marjory Stoneman Douglas John Kunkel Small David Fairchild Frank Stranahan Ion Farris Ivy Julia Cromartie Stranahan http://everglades.fiu.edu/reclaim/bios/index.htm[10/1/2014 2:16:58 PM] Everglades Digital Library Henry Flagler James Mallory Willson Duncan Upshaw Fletcher William Sherman Jennings John Clayton Gifford Home | About Us | Browse | Ask an Everglades Librarian | FIU Libraries This site is designed and maintained by the Digital Collections Center - [email protected] Everglades Information Network & Digital Library at Florida International University Libraries Copyright © Florida International University Libraries. All rights reserved. http://everglades.fiu.edu/reclaim/bios/index.htm[10/1/2014 2:16:58 PM] Everglades Digital Library Guide to Collection Everglades Timeline Everglades Biographies Everglades Biographies Bowman Foster Ashe Research Help Bowman Foster Ashe, a native of Scottsdale, Pennsylvania, came to Miami in Everglades Librarian 1926 to be involved with the foundation of the University of Miami. Dr. Ashe graduated from the University of Pittsburgh and held honorary degrees from the Ordering Reproductions University of Pittsburgh, Stetson University, Florida Southern College and Mount Union College.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barnacle 3485 Main Highway
    THE BARNACLE 3485 MAIN HIGHWAY Designation Report City of Miami REPORT OF THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TO THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD ON THE POTENTIAL DESIGNATION OF THE BARNACLE 3485 MAIN HIGHWAY AS A HERITAGE CONSERVATION ZONING DISTRICT Prepared by Sarah E. Eaton 09/15/82 Historic Preservation Date Consultant Accepted by Charles Edwin Chase 09/28/82 Chairman Designated by Miami City Commission Ordinance No. 9564 Date 01/13/83 CONTENTS I. General Information 4 II. Significance 7 III. Historical Information 9 IV. Architectural Information 10 V. Planning Context 15 VI. HC Zoning Elements 16 VII. Bibliography 17 3 I. GENERAL INFORMATION Historic Name: The Barnacle Current Name: The Barnacle State Historic Site Location: 3485 Main Highway Main, Florida Present Owner: Department of Natural Resources Division of Recreation and Parks 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32303 Present Use: Museum Zoning District: R-1B HC Zoning Overlay District: HC-1 Boundary Description: Lot 8 lying southeast of County Road of the plat of MUNROE ET AL PLAT, as recorded in Deed Book D at Page 253, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. HC Zoning Classification: Historic Site 4 Dade County Historic Survey Rating: Architectural Significance - 1 Historical Significance - 1 Contextural Significance - 1 5 6 II. SIGNIFICANCE Statement of Significance: The Barnacle is significant for its association with Ralph Middleton Munroe, one of Coconut Grove’s earliest pioneers, and as a reflection of this early era of Coconut Grove’s history. The building is an outstanding example of vernacular architecture in Dade County at the turn of the century and is particularly noteworthy for its adaptability to the South Florida environment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complex Metacommunity Structure for Gastropods Along an Elevational Gradient
    BIOTROPICA 43(4): 480–488 2011 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00727.x A Complex Metacommunity Structure for Gastropods Along an Elevational Gradient Steven J. Presley1,5, Michael R. Willig1, Christopher P. Bloch2, Ivan Castro-Arellano1,3, Christopher L. Higgins4, and Brian T. Klingbeil1 1 Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 3107 Horsebarn Hill Road, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-4210, U.S.A. 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts 02325, U.S.A. 3 Instituto Tecnologico de Ciudad Victoria, Boulevard Emilio Portes Gil 103 Pte., Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas CP 87010, Mexico 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas 76402, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The metacommunity framework integrates species-specific responses to environmental gradients to detect emergent patterns of mesoscale organization. Abiotic char- acteristics (temperature, precipitation) and associated vegetation types change with elevation in a predictable fashion, providing opportunities to decouple effects of environmental gradients per se from those of biogeographical or historical origin. Moreover, expected structure is different if a metacommunity along an elevational gradient is molded by idiosyncratic responses to abiotic variables (expectation = Gleasonian structure) than if such a metacommunity is molded by strong habitat preferences or specializations (expectation = Clementsian structure). We evaluated metacommunity structure for 13 species of gastropod from 15 sites along an ele- vational transect in the Luquillo Experimental Forest of Puerto Rico. Analyses were conducted separately for the primary axis and for the secondary axis of corre- spondence extracted via reciprocal averaging. The metacommunity exhibited quasi-Clementsian structure along the primary axis, which represented a gradient of gastropod species specialization that was unassociated with elevation.
    [Show full text]
  • Solaropsis Brasiliana, Anatomy, Range Extension and Its Phylogenetic Position Within Pleurodontidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Stylommatophora)
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2018) (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820170261 www.scielo.br/aabc | www.fb.com/aabcjournal Solaropsis brasiliana, anatomy, range extension and its phylogenetic position within Pleurodontidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Stylommatophora) MARÍA GABRIELA CUEZZO1, AUGUSTO P. DE LIMA2 and SONIA B. DOS SANTOS2 1Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical/CONICET-UNT, Crisóstomo Álvarez, 722, 4000 Tucumán, Argentina 2Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, PHLC, Sala 525-2, 20550-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Manuscript received on April 7, 2017; accepted for publication on October 13, 2017 ABSTRACT A detailed anatomical revision on Solaropsis brasiliana (Deshayes 1832) has been carried out. New characters on shell, anatomy of soft parts, and a review of the genus distribution in South America, as well as clarification on S. brasiliana distributional area are provided in the present study. Solaropsis brasiliana is diagnosed by its globose, solid, and hirsute shell, with periphery obsoletely angular, bursa copulatrix with a thick, long diverticulum, a thick, long flagellum and a penis retractor muscle forked, with the vas deferens passing through it. This compiled information was used to test the phylogenetic position of S. brasiliana within South American Pleurodontidae through a cladistics analysis. In the phylogenetic hypothesis obtained, S. brasiliana is sister group of S. gibboni (Pfeiffer 1846) and the monophyly of the genus Solaropsis Beck is also supported. Here, we sustain that the distribution of S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complex Metacommunity Structure for Gastropods Along an Elevational Gradient
    BIOTROPICA 43(4): 480–488 2011 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00727.x A Complex Metacommunity Structure for Gastropods Along an Elevational Gradient Steven J. Presley1,5, Michael R. Willig1, Christopher P. Bloch2, Ivan Castro-Arellano1,3, Christopher L. Higgins4, and Brian T. Klingbeil1 1 Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 3107 Horsebarn Hill Road, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-4210, U.S.A. 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts 02325, U.S.A. 3 Instituto Tecnologico de Ciudad Victoria, Boulevard Emilio Portes Gil 103 Pte., Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas CP 87010, Mexico 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas 76402, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The metacommunity framework integrates species-specific responses to environmental gradients to detect emergent patterns of mesoscale organization. Abiotic char- acteristics (temperature, precipitation) and associated vegetation types change with elevation in a predictable fashion, providing opportunities to decouple effects of environmental gradients per se from those of biogeographical or historical origin. Moreover, expected structure is different if a metacommunity along an elevational gradient is molded by idiosyncratic responses to abiotic variables (expectation = Gleasonian structure) than if such a metacommunity is molded by strong habitat preferences or specializations (expectation = Clementsian structure). We evaluated metacommunity structure for 13 species of gastropod from 15 sites along an ele- vational transect in the Luquillo Experimental Forest of Puerto Rico. Analyses were conducted separately for the primary axis and for the secondary axis of corre- spondence extracted via reciprocal averaging. The metacommunity exhibited quasi-Clementsian structure along the primary axis, which represented a gradient of gastropod species specialization that was unassociated with elevation.
    [Show full text]
  • Frantz Residence
    FRANTZ RESIDENCE 3529 ST. GAUDENS ROAD Designation Report 1 REPORT OF THE CITY OF MIAMI PRESERVATION OFFICER TO THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD ON THE POTENTIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FRANTZ RESIDENCE AS A HISTORIC SITE Prepared By: Trisha Logan Historic Preservation Planner Reviewed and Megan Cross Schmitt Edited By: Historic Preservation Officer Passed and Adopted On: Resolution Number: 2 3 Contents I. General Information II. Preliminary Statement Of Significance III. Description IV. Application of Criteria V. Bibliography VI. Photographs 4 I- General Information Historic Name: Frantz Residence Current Name: Frantz Residence Date of Construction: 1922 Location: 3529 St. Gaudens Road Miami, Florida 33133 Present Owner: Hus., LLC 9751 E. Bay Harbor Drive, Suite 704 Bay Harbor Island, Florida 33154 Present use: Private Residential Zoning: T3-R/NCD-3 Folio No.: 01-412-800-800-80 Boundary (Legal Description): 28 54 41 The Justison and Frantz PB 6-20 lot 8 and prop int in and to common elements not dedicated to public lot size site value or 10390-1653 0579 5 Setting: The home is located on St. Gaudens Road, between Main Highway and Biscayne Bay Integrity: The home has not been subject to major alterations on the exterior, with the exception of a second floor addition to the garage footprint. 5 II- Statement of Significance Architect(s): Richard Kiehnel and John B. Elliott Constructed in 1922, the home located at 3529 St. Gaudens Road, was originally built for Albert Frantz and his wife Belle. Albert Frantz was part owner in the Sunshine Fruits Company, an organization that was instrumental in the development of Coconut Grove, along with his business partner Harold deBussy Justison.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAVE of EVA AMELIA HEWITT MUNROE Adjacent to 2875 Me FARLANE ROAD
    GRAVE OF EVA AMELIA HEWITT MUNROE Adjacent to 2875 Me FARLANE ROAD Designation Report october 6, 2009 Historic and Environmental Preservation Board City of Miami Grave of Eva Amelia Hewitt Munroe Designation Report GRAVE OF EVA EMELliA HEVV~TT MUNROE ADJACENT TO 2875 MCFARLANE RD Grove of Eva Amelio Hewitt Munroe Designation Report I. GRAVESITE OF EVA AMELIA MUNROE a. General Information Page 4 b. statement of Significance Page 5 c. Description Page 5 d. Appiication of Criteria Page 6 II. BiBLIOGRAPHY Page 7 III. PHOTOGRAPHS Page 8 Grave of Eva Amelia Hewitt Munroe Designation Report II. GRAVESITE OF EVA AMELIA HEWITTMUNROE A. General Information Historic Name: Gravesite of Eva Amelia Hewitt Munroe (1858-1882) Current Name: Gravesite of Eva Amelia Hewitt Munroe Date of Burial: Died in1882, buried in current location in c.18841 Location: Adjacent to 2875 McFarlane Road, Miami, Florida Present Owner: The Munroe Family c/o Charles P. Munroe 7641 SW53rd Avenue Miami, Florida 33143 Boundary (Legal) Description Beginning at a galvanized pipe situated 5ft. lOin. in a southwesterly direction from the west corner from the Cocoanut Grove Library Association Building (Miami-Dade Public Libraries), and on the boundary line between the Library lot and that of the Community Club (Women's Club) property fronting on MacFarlane Road, in the city of Cocoanut Grove, thence southwesterly along said boundary line to the center of MacFarlane Road, thence run (20) feet along said MacFarlane Road in a northwesterly direction; thence in a northwesterly direction to the intersection of a line drawn between the Library Association (Miami-Dade Public Libraries) property and the Community Club (Women's Club) property, which said line shall be drawn from a point on the boundary line distant fifteen (15) feet northeasterly from the point of beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    a Proceedings of the United States National Museum SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION • WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 121 1967 Number 3579 VALID ZOOLOGICAL NAMES OF THE PORTLAND CATALOGUE By Harald a. Rehder Research Curator, Division of Mollusks Introduction An outstanding patroness of the arts and sciences in eighteenth- century England was Lady Margaret Cavendish Bentinck, Duchess of Portland, wife of William, Second Duke of Portland. At Bulstrode in Buckinghamshire, magnificent summer residence of the Dukes of Portland, and in her London house in Whitehall, Lady Margaret— widow for the last 23 years of her life— entertained gentlemen in- terested in her extensive collection of natural history and objets d'art. Among these visitors were Sir Joseph Banks and Daniel Solander, pupil of Linnaeus. As her own particular interest was in conchology, she received from both of these men many specimens of shells gathered on Captain Cook's voyages. Apparently Solander spent considerable time working on the conchological collection, for his manuscript on descriptions of new shells was based largely on the "Portland Museum." When Lady Margaret died in 1785, her "Museum" was sold at auction. The task of preparing the collection for sale and compiling the sales catalogue fell to the Reverend John Lightfoot (1735-1788). For many years librarian and chaplain to the Duchess and scientif- 1 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 121 ically inclined with a special leaning toward botany and conchology, he was well acquainted with the collection. It is not surprising he went to considerable trouble to give names and figure references to so many of the mollusks and other invertebrates that he listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Parkgrove-MAGAZINE-Fnl-Presentation.Pdf
    ISSUE ONE ISSUE PARK GROVE 4 5 WORDS Dr. Paul George, Ph.D. little more than a century ago, Greater Miami was a vast wilderness with small clusters of hardy settlers living along the shores of Biscayne Bay. One of those communities was Coconut Grove, which, since the late nineteenth century, has enjoyed a reputation as south Florida’s A most attractive, dynamic and independent-minded community. Its natural setting is unrivaled, for Coconut Grove looks out from behind lush subtropical foliage toward the turquoise waters of the Bay. The province of Tequesta Indians until recent centuries, Coconut Grove was, by the early nineteenth century, a favorite stop for mariners attracted to the bubbling fresh water springs on its waterfront. After the Cape Florida Lighthouse opened in 1825, light keepers and their assistants became frequent visitors to Coconut Grove. Wreckers or salvagers of disabled ships also visited the area. By the middle decades of the nineteenth century, It was Munroe who suggested to his British friends Coconut Grove’s first known permanent residents, that they open a guest house in the area for its Edmund (“Ned”) and Ann Beasley, lived along its ever-growing number of visitors. The Peacocks bay front in the area around today’s Barnacle State opened the Bay View Inn, a simple wood frame Park. When Ned died, Ann rented a portion of their structure, in 1882 in today’s Peacock Park. It was property to Dr. Horace Porter, a onetime Union the first “hotel” in the area. Some of the Inn’s early surgeon. Porter applied for a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Solaropsis Brasiliana, Anatomy, Range Extension and Its Phylogenetic Position Within Pleurodontidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Stylommatophora)
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2018) 90(3): 2753-2765 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820170261 www.scielo.br/aabc | www.fb.com/aabcjournal Solaropsis brasiliana, anatomy, range extension and its phylogenetic position within Pleurodontidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Stylommatophora) MARÍA GABRIELA CUEZZO1, AUGUSTO P. DE LIMA2 and SONIA B. DOS SANTOS2 1Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical/CONICET-UNT, Crisóstomo Álvarez, 722, 4000 Tucumán, Argentina 2Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, PHLC, Sala 525-2, 20550-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Manuscript received on April 7, 2017; accepted for publication on October 13, 2017 ABSTRACT A detailed anatomical revision on Solaropsis brasiliana (Deshayes 1832) has been carried out. New characters on shell, anatomy of soft parts, and a review of the genus distribution in South America, as well as clarification on S. brasiliana distributional area are provided in the present study. Solaropsis brasiliana is diagnosed by its globose, solid, and hirsute shell, with periphery obsoletely angular, bursa copulatrix with a thick, long diverticulum, a thick, long flagellum and a penis retractor muscle forked, with the vas deferens passing through it. This compiled information was used to test the phylogenetic position of S. brasiliana within South American Pleurodontidae through a cladistics analysis. In the phylogenetic hypothesis obtained, S. brasiliana is sister group of S. gibboni (Pfeiffer 1846) and the monophyly of the genus Solaropsis Beck is also supported. Here, we sustain that the distribution of S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Trapping with Blacklight: Effects on Isolated Populations of Insectsl
    Mass Trapping with Blacklight: Effects on Isolated Populations of Insectsl w. W. CANTELO; J. L. GOODENOUGH," A. H. BAUMHOVER,' J. S. SMITH, JR.,' J. M. STANLEY,· AND T. J. HENNEBERRY' USDA ABSTRACT Blacklight traps were operated for 43 months at a density of 3 per square mile on an isolated tropical island, St. Croix, U. S. Virgin Islands, to determine the effect on popu- lations of 25 insect species. Subsequently, the density of traps was reduced to 0.3 per square mile for] 8 months, and changes in the collections were noted. The test species were: Agrius cingulatus (F.), Callionima ramsdeni (Clark), Eumor- pha vitis (L.), Hyles lineata (F.), Manduca rustica harterti (Rothschild), Manduca sexta (L.), Xylophanes pluto (F.), X. tersa (L.), Heliothis virescens (F.), H. zea (Bod- die), Ecpantheria icasia (Cramer), Gryllus assimilis (F.), Microcentrum triangulatum Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ee/article/3/3/389/2395318 by guest on 29 September 2021 Brunner, N eoconocephalus triops (L.), Schistocerca pallens (Thunberg), A crosternum marginatum (Palisot De Beauvois), Loxa pilipes Horvath, Nezara viridula (L.), ladera rufofusca Barber, Bothynus cuniculus (F.), Phyllophaga microphylla Moser, P. por- toricensis (Smyth), Calosoma alternans alternans (F.), Conoderus sp. and Lacon sub- costatus (Candeze). Many species had decreased populations as measured by BL trap collections during the 43 months, and within a year after the trap density was reduced most had surges to population levels as high or higher than those recorded during masstrapping. Lepidop- teran population indices were more affected than indices of other orders. Generally, most decreases and increases in populations appeared to be related to the trapping, but the numbers of some species that were removed by the traps were so low that any effect was indirect.
    [Show full text]
  • A Photographic Field Guide to the Sphingidae at the Archbold Tropical Research and Education Centre
    A Photographic Field Guide to the Sphingidae at the Archbold Tropical Research and Education Centre Caitlin Grant Texas A&M University Dr. James Woolley Dr. Tom Lacher Dominica Study Abroad 2011 Abstract Thirty-three moths from ten species of the family Sphingidae were collected. A representative of each species was photographed. Specimens were added to the collections at Texas A&M University and the Archbold Tropical Research and Education Centre. Introduction I had originally come to Dominica hoping to study all Lepidoptera on the island. After collecting several species, I quickly became fascinated with Sphinx moths and decided to focus my study on them. Sphinx moths belong to the order Lepidoptera and the family Sphingidae. Many of these moths are large-bodied and can be distinguished from other Lepidoptera by their long, slender forewings and small rounded hind wings. Many have been recorded with wingspans of 160 millimeters or more. They are very strong fliers and have earned the nickname “hummingbird moths” due to their size and flight patterns (Triplehorn, 2005). Materials and Methods The majority of the Sphingids seemed to appear around the station on their own. We had a light trap set up with a black light to capture other insects and some of the moths were found on the sheet. Many were even found on the sheet in the morning long after the light had been turned off. I collected the Sphingids by taking a Ziplock bag and holding it over the specimen until it flew into the bag. If I couldn’t reach the moth, I would use an aerial net to capture it and transfer it to a Ziplock.
    [Show full text]