DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Chiltern Green Energy Park Lead Executive Member(S): Cllr Sian Timoney Wards Affected: All Consultations: Councillors ☐ Scrutiny ☐ Stakeholders ☐ Others ☐

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Chiltern Green Energy Park Lead Executive Member(S): Cllr Sian Timoney Wards Affected: All Consultations: Councillors ☐ Scrutiny ☐ Stakeholders ☐ Others ☐ Report For: Executive Item No: Date: 23 August 2018 Report Of: Service Director – Property & Construction 3.1 Report Author: Roger Kirk Subject: Proposed Chiltern Green Energy Park Lead Executive Member(s): Cllr Sian Timoney Wards Affected: All Consultations: Councillors ☐ Scrutiny ☐ Stakeholders ☐ Others ☐ Recommendations 1. That Executive instructs the Corporate Director – Place & Infrastructure to submit a response on behalf of the Council to Central Bedfordshire Council with respect to the request for an Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Opinion in regard of the proposed Chiltern Green Energy Park development at East Hyde. 2. That, in the event that a formal planning application is lodged with Central Bedfordshire Council in respect of the above proposed development, Executive instructs the Corporate Director – Place & Infrastructure to refer any response to Executive for review prior to submission. Background 3. Emsrayne Renewable Energy Ltd (a company based in Caddington) intend to submit a planning application to Central Bedfordshire Council to construct and operate a Combined Heat & Power generation facility at New Mill End (East Hyde) that would import up to 500,000 tons of refuse derived fuel (or similar residual waste) per annum. 4. Residual waste is defined as the non-hazardous combustible mixed material that remains after the traditional waste recycling process. 5. This would be incinerated by the “moving grate” combustion process to produce an energy output equivalent to circa 100 MWe. 6. It is proposed that an underground insulated pipeline will carry pressurised hot water from the facility to a connection point close to London Luton Airport. 7. Electricity would be transported via an underground cable to a new substation in the vicinity of London Luton Airport, which would be connected in turn to Luton South substation belonging to UK Power Networks. The Current Position 8. The Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 specify the types of development for which an Environmental Impact Assessment is mandatory. The proposed facility would fall into this category. 9. The intended planning application will therefore have to be accompanied by an Environmental Statement based on a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment. 10. As a result Emsrayne Renewable Energy Ltd have submitted a document to Central Bedfordshire Council formally requesting them to provide a scoping opinion on the proposed Environmental Impact Assessment, as provided for by Section 15 of the regulations referred to above. 11. On 27.06.18 Central Bedfordshire Council in turn asked potentially interested parties (including Luton Borough Council) to submit representations as to what areas and issues the Environmental Impact Assessment in question should cover. 12. Representations were originally required by 11.07.18 but this deadline has been extended to 31.08.18. Goals and Objectives 13. The prime objective is to ensure that the proposed Environmental Impact Assessment fully and critically examines the potential impact of the proposed development on Luton residents and businesses. Proposal 14. The proposal is for the Corporate Director – Place & Infrastructure to submit a response to Central Bedfordshire Council suggesting that the Environmental Impact Assessment covers the concerns listed in the points below: 15. The proposed route to and from the site is stated as the Lower Harpenden Road B653 to Airport Way A1081 to access the strategic road network i.e. the M1. Airport Way is a traffic sensitive road. 16. The estimated throughput of the proposed plant is 500,000 tonnes per annum. Without knowing the density of the waste it is impossible to predict the likely traffic generation. If the waste is in compressed bales it is likely to generate up 250 two way vehicle movements per day based on a 5 day working week. If it is loose waste the vehicle movements could easily triple. 17. The proposed scope of the network modelling is therefore unacceptable. It is likely that all the junctions on Airport Way including those at M1 junctions 10 and 10a will require assessment. Additionally, no mention is made of modelling the roundabout junctions on Lower Harpenden Road at Gipsy Lane and Parkway. 18. The scoping report mentions looking at the width and alignment of Lower Harpenden Road. While it is a B road, it is relatively narrow and has a number of bends with extremely restricted forward visibility. It could not therefore be considered as a particularly satisfactory route for a large number of two way HGV movements. 19. It appears that the plant will cater for waste from a very wide area, all of which will be arriving by road. This is not a very sustainable way of transporting waste. 20. There is potential for substantial adverse Air Quality and Noise pollution for Luton Residents. This risk will have to be assessed. 21. As the site is close to Luton Hoo Park, the River Lea and the Luton to Harpenden Cycle- Way there will need to be a detailed assessment of any potential related landscape, heritage and public amenity issues as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment. 22. An Aerodrome Safeguarding Assessment should be required with respect to the potential impact on flights to and from London Luton Airport. 23. A Health Impact Assessment should be required for the wider area of population not just that in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development. 24. The Environmental Impact Assessment should take notice of the proposed development of New Century Park and future London Luton Airport expansion plans. 25. The proposed development sits at odds with the Council’s plans to provide a green energy supply to London Luton Airport and surrounding businesses by the construction of solar and wind based electricity generation capacity. Key Risks 26. Not to respond to the request by Central Bedfordshire Council for input on the scope of the proposed Environmental Impact Assessment would prevent the Council having a say in what it should cover from a Luton residents and businesses perspective. Consultations 27. None at this stage. Alternative options considered and rejected (please specify) 28. Not to respond to the request by Central Bedfordshire Council for input on the scope of the proposed Environmental Impact Assessment. Appendices Attached 29. Letter dated 27.06.18 from Central Bedfordshire Council. Background Papers 30. Proposed Chiltern Green Energy Park ay East Hyde. Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. Request for a Scoping Opinion under Regulation 15. SLR on behalf of Emsrayne Renewable Energy Ltd June 2018. IMPLICATIONS For Executive Reports: • All grey boxes must be completed • All statements must be cleared by an appropriate officer For CLMT Reports: • Only the dark grey boxes must be completed • Clearance is not required Legal Clearance Agreed By Dated There are no direct legal implications to what is Kemi Onakoya, Principal 8 August proposed in this report. Solicitor (Property & 2018 Planning) Finance Clearance Agreed By Dated The report has no direct financial implications. Darren Lambert, Finance 6th August However, should a formal planning application be Business Partner 2018 submitted to Central Bedfordshire Council the Council may need to incur costs dependent on how far the planning process progresses. Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA) – Key Points Equalities / Cohesion / Inclusion (Social Justice) Clearance Agreed By Dated Of itself the Council’s proposed response has no Social Justice Unit 10.08.18 Social Justice implications. Environment Clearance Agreed By Dated Whilst the principle of energy from waste is clearly Keith Dove, Strategic Policy 8th August beneficial in terms of reducing CO2, this needs to be Adviser 2018 balanced against the emissions as a result of an increase in Heavy Goods Vehicle movements serving the site Health Clearance Agreed By Dated Public Health agree it is important that full Lucy Hubber, Consultant in 7/8/18 investigations to protect the environment and health Public Health [Interim] be carried out with respect to such proposals. A full health impact assessment for residents of Luton and the wider area be carried out before any planning application is agreed in this context. Alongside a full environmental impact assessment this should support informed decision making in the interests of Luton’s environment and public health. It is also felt that specialist public health opinion should be sought from the Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards [PHE CRCE] as part of the formal planning process. The Chief Medical Officer in her 2017 annual report urges policy makers to take the threat to health posed by air pollution seriously and to realise that addressing pollution is disease prevention. Air pollution is the greatest environmental harm to human health. With estimates of UK annual deaths estimated between 29,000 to 40,000. Luton already has a higher percentage of adult deaths [6%] related to exposure to air pollution than England [5.3%]. Transport is a major source of both air and noise pollution and good air quality and reduced noise pollution are important elements of providing a healthy place and should be protected wherever possible. The health impacts of this possible proposal should be understood fully using full health and environmental impact assessments. Community Safety Clearance Agreed By Dated Staffing Clearance Agreed By Dated Other Clearance Agreed By Dated .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 07 Appendix C Review of Polling Districts and Places V2
    APPENDIX C CURRENT AND PROJECTED DATA, RESPONSES TO STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS AND ARO’s RECOMMENDATIONS Ampthill Ward Polling PD Polling Electorate Polling Station Recommendation Place Ref. District 2013 2018 The Firs Lower School, Station Road, To create a more even number of electors at each AMP1-4 AMP1 Ampthill (part) 2,131 2,510 Ampthill MK45 2QR polling station and to accommodate the projected Ampthill Baptist Church, Dunstable growth in the number of electors, the ARO AMP1-4 AMP2 Ampthill (part) 1,543 1,553 Street, Ampthill MK45 2JS RECOMMENDS that the polling district Russell Lower School, Queens Road boundaries in Ampthill be redrawn to create an AMP1-4 AMP3 Ampthill (part) (access via Saunders Piece entrance), 1,398 1,777 additional polling district (AMP5) and that two new Ampthill MK45 2TD polling stations be used – Ampthill Library and The Wingfield Club – which will be more convenient for electors in the new polling districts. This would necessitate discontinuing the use of Ampthill Baptist Church. The ARO was asked to consider using the Town Ampthill Methodist Church Room, Council Chamber, 66 Dunstable Street, Ampthill AMP1-4 AMP4 Ampthill (part) 887 896 Chandos Road, Ampthill MK45 2JS as a polling station but the Methodist Church Room is more convenient for voters and has parking advantages. The current polling districts AMP5 to AMP7 will be re-indexed. The streets and polling stations in the new Ampthill polling districts are set out below. Clophill Methodist Church, High Street, AMP5 AMP5 Clophill 1,409 1,460 No changes other
    [Show full text]
  • Legal & General Property
    Legal & General Property Representations on soundness Economy, Airport, Green Belt and landscape policies of the Draft Luton Local Plan for Public Consultation (2011-2031) Savills August 2014 August 2014 Representations on Behalf of Legal & General Property Economic, Airport, Green Belt and Landscape Policies of the Draft Luton Local Plan (2011 – 2031) Soundness 1. Introduction 1.1. This Statement of Representation is submitted by Savills UK Limited on behalf of Legal & General Property (LGP) in relation to Policy LP 4 (Green Belt), Policy LP 29 (Landscape and Geological Conservation); Policy LP 6 (London Luton Airport), Policy LP 31 (Sustainable Transport Strategy), the Key Diagram and Policies Map, and Policy LP 13 (Economic Strategy) of the Draft Luton Local Plan for Public Consultation (2011 – 2031) (June 2014) (DLLP). The representation justifies why it is considered that the DLLP is not sound in relation to these policies. 1.2. LGP owns approximately 23 ha of land at Someries Farm occupying a strategic location south of London Luton Airport with direct frontage to the Airport operational boundary. Appendix 1 contains a Site Location Plan and a copy of the DLLP Key Diagram showing a proposed amendment. 1.3. The Statement is arranged in the following sections: • Section 2 sets out the case on soundness – this addresses economic, Airport, Green Belt, landscape, and site specific considerations. • Section 3 provides conclusions. Legal & General Property Representations on the Draft Luton Local Plan (June 2014) Page 1 August 2014 2. Soundness – Economic Policies, Green Belt and Airport Economic policies 2.1. The economic strategy seeks to provide land that can deliver about 18,000 B class jobs over the plan period to 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley
    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD OF THE CHALK UPLANDS OF NORTHWEST EUROPE The Chilterns, Pegsdon, Bedfordshire (photograph L. Blundell) Lesley Blundell UCL Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD September 2019 2 I, Lesley Blundell, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: 3 4 Abstract Our understanding of early human behaviour has always been and continues to be predicated on an archaeological record unevenly distributed in space and time. More than 80% of British Lower-Middle Palaeolithic findspots were discovered during the late 19th/early 20th centuries, the majority from lowland fluvial contexts. Within the British planning process and some academic research, the resultant findspot distributions are taken at face value, with insufficient consideration of possible bias resulting from variables operating on their creation. This leads to areas of landscape outside the river valleys being considered to have only limited archaeological potential. This thesis was conceived as an attempt to analyse the findspot data of the Lower-Middle Palaeolithic record of the Chalk uplands of southeast Britain and northern France within a framework complex enough to allow bias in the formation of findspot distribution patterns and artefact preservation/discovery opportunities to be identified and scrutinised more closely. Taking a dynamic, landscape = record approach, this research explores the potential influence of geomorphology, 19th/early 20th century industrialisation and antiquarian collecting on the creation of the Lower- Middle Palaeolithic record through the opportunities created for artefact preservation and release.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunstable Bus Timetable
    Pulloxhill Pulloxhill ◆ 79.89 162 Woburn Eversholt X31 .42 ◆ Holwell 77◆.197◆ 20 Higham 100 Woburn 138◆ 138◆ Apsley 150 20◆ Gobion 162 Abbey Eversholt 140◆ Westoning End 150◆ 139◆ 77◆ W14◆ 89 6 X31 138◆ 0 M1 4 140◆ 138◆ 2 Westoning 79 89 Dunstable Bus Timetable 1 Little 140◆ 5 Flitwick & Harlington W10◆ Brickhill 10 A F7◆ W12◆ 162 ◆ Tingrith PLUSBUS Zone Ickleford A 160◆ 138◆ 138 Barton-le-Clay Pirton 82 5 ◆ 20◆.X31◆ Windsor Parade 162 165◆ A 139 89 M2 4 M ◆ ◆ 79 A ◆ 0 Milton 140◆ 20◆ 42.77 .138 74◆ E7 1 1 74◆ 6 2 197◆ 0 th Bryan 42 Harlington 0 28 March 2011 www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk 197◆ 20◆ Barton-le-Clay ◆ ton 8 X31 W14 gh u Sharpenhoe Hexton O Great B655 Pegsdon Flying Fox Harlington S1 Hitchin 82 Brickhill 20.X31◆ Sharpenhoe B65 5 Bancroft a 140◆ 20 79 77◆ 89◆ l M1 42.77◆.138◆ Clappers King’s Wood Junction 12 74◆ Barton M1.M2.E7◆ Hills 77◆ 77◆.82.89 This booklet also covers Houghton Regis, Eaton Bray, mond Stockgrove 165◆ 160◆ Hitchin Country Park 150 Sundon Hills S1.20◆ Caddington, Whipsnade and surrounding villages 162 20.X31◆ Country Park A Toddington Streatley 74◆.79 X31 4 42.77◆ 20◆ W14◆ ◆ 0 10 77 77◆ A 1 ◆ Toddington 138◆.140◆ Heath and 5 Battlesden 2 139 W10◆ 5 Reach X31.42.77◆ 50 W14◆ M Upper 79 A 77◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ 1 165 138 .140 Sundon 70 27 160◆ 74◆ 162 A 150 S1 6 27 42◆ 20 20 20◆ 100 Leighton Buzzard 27 Tebworth X31 A 74◆ Lower 79 PLUSBUS Zone 5 B Gosmore Hockliffe 1 57 Sundon X31 2 9 0 Lilley 2 139◆ Leighton Chalton 20 Great 69◆ Offley Buzzard 10 10◆ ◆ 69◆ Wingfield 05 139 Luton A5 X31 X31 74◆ PLUSBUS Zone A ◆ 5 42 X31
    [Show full text]
  • Luton Borough Landscape Character Assessment
    Luton Borough Landscape Character Assessment A Report by the Greensand Trust on behalf of Luton Borough Council June 2014 1 Contents 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Background 3 1.2 What is Landscape? 4 1.3 Purpose of the LCA 5 1.4 The Planning Policy Background and the NPPF 5 1.5 The Study Area 6 2. Methodology 7 2.1 Introduction to the Methodology 7 2.2 Desk Study 7 2.3 Draft LCAs 9 2.4 Field Surveys 9 3. The Landscape Character Areas 10 4. Landscape Opportunity Areas 11 4.1 Definition of Landscape Opportunity Areas 11 4.2 The Opportunity Areas 12 References 21 Acknowledgements 21 Appendix 1: Field Survey Pro-Forma (sample) 22 Appendix 2: LCA Descriptions 23 2 1. Introduction 1.1 Background Luton Borough Council is producing a “Local Plan Review” in 2014 which will replace the previous Local Plan (2001-2011). It is estimated that the town will require new dwellings (and associated infrastructure and employment land) for approximately 50,000 new residents in the period to 2031 (figures provided by Luton Borough Council Local Plans Team). There is a need to plan for this growth, and to ensure that it does not have an adverse effect on Luton’s environment, including its landscape. Luton is situated in the gap carved through the chalk hills by the River Lea, and the influence of the chalk geology is significant, providing the setting for the town. The Luton Local Plan (2011-2031) is intended to provide the blueprint for growth in a sustainable context.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Bedfordshire
    INDEX TO PLACES SERVED CODE OPERATOR TELEPHONE WEBSITE Combined Bus and Rail Tickets Buy your train journey and PLUSBUS tickets PLACE NAME GRID REF. PLACE NAME GRID REF. PLACE NAME GRID REF. PLACE NAME GRID REF. PLACE NAME GRID REF. PLACE NAME GRID REF. PLACE NAME GRID REF. AB A2B Bus & Coach www.a 2bbusandcoach.com Chalton H9 Ickwell H8 Silsoe F6/F7 in one easy transaction at the station or by Ampthill E7 Flamstead F2 Millbrook E7 Upper Caldecote H9 phone. Ask for PLUSBUS when buying your Apsley End G6 Chawston H11 Flitton F6 Ivinghoe C2 Milton Keynes A8-C6 Slapton C3 Upper Gravenhurst G6/G7 AR Arriva the Shires & Essex 08448 00 44 11 www.arrivabus.co.uk/South-East/ train ticket and say whether you want bus travel at the start, the finish or both Cheddington C3 Ivinghoe Aston D3 Slip End F3 ends of your train journey. You can also get PLUSBUS when you buy your tickets Arlesey I6 Flitwick E6 Milton Bryan D5 Upper Shelton D8 CB Centrebus 0844 351 1120 www.centrebus. info online. For further details visit the website www.plusbus.info Aspley Guise C7 Chicksands Junction G7 Flying Fox C5 Kempston E9 MK General Hospital B7 Soulbury B5 Upper Sundon E5/F5 What’s more you can pay with cash, credit or debit cards. Aston Abbots A3 Chiltern Green G3 Gamlingay I10/J10 Kensworth E3 Moggerhanger G9 Southill H8 Wardhedges F6 FL Flittabus 07960 388 111 www.flittabus.co.uk Aston Clinton B1/B2 Church End D3 Gosmore I5 Kimpton H3 Moulsoe C8 St Albans H1 Wavendon C7 Bus Users is a non-profit organisation that champions the rights of bus and coach users.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilternarealocalarea Transportplan
    ChilternAreaLocalArea TransportPlan Version: 130204 1 2 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 What is the Local Area Transport Plan................................................................................ 6 1.2 What Geographical area does the plan cover ..................................................................... 6 1.3 Engagement and Consultation ............................................................................................ 7 1.4 Public participation .............................................................................................................. 7 2. Background ............................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 The Local Transport Plan .................................................................................................... 8 3. Planning & Development Context ...................................................................................... 11 3.1 Housing Development ....................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Development Strategy for Central Bedfordshire................................................................ 12 3.3 Caddington & Slip End Neighbourhood Plan .................................................................... 13 3.4 The Chilterns AONB Management Plan: A Framework for Action...................................
    [Show full text]
  • TRADES. F.AR 233 Oliver J
    - B F.DFOR r,~ HIRE. J TRADES. F.AR 233 Oliver J. The Hoo, Pertenhall, St. Neots Reynolds William, Swineshead, St. Neots Simpkins Thomas, Mount Plea&\nt, Oliver J. Wigmore hall, Stopsley, Luton Richards William, Begwary, Colmworth, Lower Stondon, Shefford Olnev G. W. Stanbridge, Leighton Buzzard St. Neots Simpson John, Cotton End, Bedford Olney Thomas, Flitton, Ampthill Richardson Alfd. Sun st. Potton, Sandy Simpson Thomas, Haynes, Bedford · Olney Mrs. Thomas, Westoning, Ampthill Ricketts W. Park la. Morhanger, Sandy Simpson Thomas, Pavenham, Bedford Osborn D. & J. Tebworth, Hockli:ffe Ridgeway John W. Chaul End, Cadding- Sims Reginald, Haynes, Bedford Os born Frank, Barton, Ampthill ton, Luton Sinfield James, Whipsnade, Dnnstable Os born Fred, Barton, Ampthill Ridgwav J ames, Houghton park, Ampthill Siret John, Totternhoe, Dunstable Osborn Joseph William, Warmarck, Tod- Roads Mrs. Clara, Milton Bryan, Woburn Skevington Albt. Milton Bryan, Wobum • dington, Dunstable Roberts A. R. Eaton Bray, Dunstable Skevington Edward, Bromham, Bedford Osborn R. Greenfield, Flitton, Ampthill Roberts Fredk. Geo. Campton, Shefford Smith Fredk. & Arthur, Limbnry, Luton Osborn Walter, Barton, Ampthill Roberts James, The Rye, Eaton Bray, Smith Alex. G. Stotfold, Baldock (Herts) Osborn Wesley, Wingfield, Hockliffe Dunstable Smith Alfred, Podington, Wellingborough Osborn William, Happy land, Todding- Roberts Thomas, Sharpenhoe, Ampthill Smith Charles, Langford, Biggleswade ton, Dumtable Roberts W. Inwards, Lidlington, Ampthill Smith Charles Batham, Duck .:nd, Osborne Thomas James, Brigginton, Robertson J. Hinwick, Wellingborough Stevington, Bedford Eggington, Leighton Buzzard Robins Jabez, Little Staughton, St. Neots Smith Ebenezer, Riseley, Bedford ()wen Thomas, Kempston, Bedford Robinson Mrs. Annie, Stevington,Bedford Smith Frank, Bidwell, Dunstable Palmar Brothers, Maulden, Ampthill Robinson Chas. Felmersham,Sharnbrook Smith Gabriel, Eyworth, Sandy Palmer A.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 17-8 Assessment Viewpoint Locations
    e W s Bramingham Park i The Old h R West Wood Coach i l t B l Legend e 1 i House h a H or k c r s o t e e t it n o h Va ua W Proposed Development le Q n n Westbury Wood ° Keepers o t !! Boundary R u Cottage L o Central a Warden Hill d Lodge ! Assessment Viewpoint Bedfordshire Cottages Laburnum Grove Locations y Westwood a North Lodge W House e Local Authorities Boundaries n B Lilley m Road a u Whitehall ha t East Lodge ing L t Bottom Farm ram e Cottages r B f The Hollybush i Inset A e l d Stopsley Luton Holes Farm Catbrook (B) Butterfield G r The Lodge Central Bedfordshire Green e e Wantsend n Kingswell d L Leggatts l Stopsley i Farm e ll i 42 e House Farm n R y Co Gre k Common o x e en k Lane N a c d B ac I n B t e o e t a o u t e v ven o L n o A m Furzen Wood i a f ld Ley Green h l ie l f L s n Stopsley g e ar 50 ! Cottage u d B ! e r o Limbury i l g R Common Lodge Farm P a B o l n a e il an 2 o d R L H id s N dy r u a n d P Parsonage Farm n a Mangrove o k e River Lea R l r Lodge d y a a T L bury Ro riAylesburyn h Lim it a or Lee 39 W y e C n dg North ri hi Vale dDistrictRo e tte a a ad u t o d Ro P e h R ustin Hertfordshire Windmill d a d A a l l a Cottage o o d R R a o ll R a 45e o District d d R e King's Walden n ! A W n u ! s a l i L h Stopsley B g Cockernhoe Farm e d c n m i y t a r Church 43 o n o h o o f o t t c c r e B R S t s d Dacorum i r d i p c H a o a k o h District (B) s o R i Kil n The Mill B R La L La n n e e ne a o 9 g Montrose Avenue R t rav o u a L e d Tankards Farm Biscot d ate Road S r W W ing e Round Green i l
    [Show full text]
  • Luton and Southern Bedfordshire Green Infrastructure Plan 2009
    Luton and southern Bedfordshire Green Infrastructure Plan 2009 Produced by the Greensand Trust on behalf of Luton and southern Bedfordshire Joint Technical Unit Luton and South Bedfordshire Green Infrastructure plan 2009 2 Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 12 1.1 Need for this Plan ......................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Policy Background ........................................................................................................ 14 1.3 What is Green Infrastructure? ...................................................................................... 15 1.4 Aim & Objectives ..................................................................................................... 16 2. Context .................................................................................................................................. 17 2.1 Environmental Context ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE LOCAL BUS CONTRACTS Red Rose 223
    APPENDIX B: CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE LOCAL BUS CONTRACTS including services contracted to neighbouring authorities to which Central Bedfordshire makes a contribution. Est. Net No. Annual Performa Outturn Cost per Description Days of Operation of Passengers nce Communities served Remarks Cost Passenger Days Carried Category 2009/10 Dunstable, Red Rose 223/231 . Caddington, Full Sunday service Woodside, Slip Bedford Borough between Dunstable, End, Sundon, pays 15.4% of Caddington, Slip End, Chalton, Sundays and Bank gross cost. Luton, Sundon, Chalton, 59 £49,757 4,200 £11.85 D Toddington, Holidays No contribution Toddington, Harlington, Harlington, from Luton Flitwick, Ampthill, Westoning, Flitwick, Borough. Maulden, Houghton Ampthill, Maulden, Conquest and Bedford. Houghton Conquest All Stagecoach 160 and Marston Moretaine, 165 journeys on Lidlington, Saturdays and School Brogborough, Holidays; Bedford to Ridgmont, Bedford Borough Leighton Buzzard, via Saturdays & School 115 £15,885 1,400 £11.35 D Husborne Crawley, pays 29.7% of Stewartby, Marston Holidays Aspley Guise, gross cost. Moretaine, Brogborough, Woburn Sands, Ridgmont, Aspley Guise, Heath & Reach, Woburn Sands and Leighton Linslade. Heath & Reach. Luton Borough Council. Extension of last Arriva Luton Borough bus no. 4 at 23:05 from Mondays to Slip End, 304 £1,967 200 £9.83 C pays 93.7% of Farley Hill to Slip End, Saturdays Caddington gross cost. Woodside and Caddington Grant Palmer 200. Biggleswade, Pays for: 06:20 Flitwick Broom, Southill, Also pays for to Biggleswade; 07:03 Stanford, Clifton, diversion of Biggleswade to Flitwick; Shefford, Campton, commercial 13:27, 16:27, 18:40 Saturdays 54 £16,370 4,000 £4.09 C Chicksands, journeys via Biggleswade to Flitwick; Gravenhurst, Southill, Campton 12:25, 14:25 Flitwick to Clophill, Maulden, and Upper Biggleswade; 17:59 Ampthill, Flitwick, Gravenhurst.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology in Bedfordshire
    490000 500000 510000 520000 530000 Stow Longa Great Hemingford Harrowden JURASSIC 0 Brampton 0 Covington Abbots 0 Hargrave 0 0 LIMESTONE, GODMANCHESTER 0 0 Chelveston 0 7 7 2 2 SANDSTONE, Caldecott Lower Dean A14 SILTSTONE AND Shelton Tilbrook Grafham (T) MUDSTONE Geology in Bedfordshire Upper Dean Kimbolton A Buckden 5 1 Yelden Stonely Offord Cluny 9 Perry 3 RUSHDEN Offord D'Arcy Hilton Wilby Newton Bromswold Melchbourne Swineshead Diddington Irchester Great Little Pertenhall Great Staughton ) Doddington Wymington (T Staughton Highway Papworth 5 Southoe 4 Wymington St Agnes A Graveley Farndish Papworth Great Paxton JURASSIC Knotting Everard Keysoe MUDPoSdiTngOtoNn E, Riseley Little Wollaston Little Paxton Knotting Staughton Toseland Yelling SILTSTONE, A6 Green Hail Weston Strixton LIMEHSinTwiOckNE AND Souldrop Lower End SANDSTONE Keysoe Row Caxton 0 Staploe Duloe 0 0 Gibbet 0 0 Grendon ST NEOTS 0 0 ) Croxton 0 6 A 428(T Eltisley 6 2 Sharnbrook 2 Eaton Socon A Eynesbury Easton Maudit Bozeat Bolnhurst 1 Thurleigh Colmworth ( Bletsoe T JURASSIC ) SANDSTONE, Odell Felmersham JURASSIC MUDSTONE, LIMESTONE Wyboston Abbotsley Duck's Cross AND Milton Ernest SILTSTONE AND Chawston Great 9 Colesden Gransden 0 Pavenham SANDSTONE 5 ARGILLACEOUS Little A Wilden Gransden ROCKS Ravensden Roxton Waresley Warrington West End Tempsford Lavendon Stevington A421(T) Oakley Salph Church End Cold Clapham Renhold End Brayfield Turvey A428 Great Barford Gamlingay A 6 Newton (T Blossomville ) Hatley St Olney Clifton Bromham Blunham Everton Reynes George East 0
    [Show full text]