DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 123/Tuesday, June 27, 2006/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 123/Tuesday, June 27, 2006/Notices 36556 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 27, 2006 / Notices Docket Nos. 50–259, 50–260, & 50–296 Columbia Generating Station Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2039, 2232b), the License Nos. DPR–33, DPR–52, & DPR– Docket No. 50–397 Advisory Committee on Reactor 68 License No. NPF–21 Safeguards (ACRS) will hold a meeting 10835 Shaw Rd. Snake River Warehouse on July 12–14, 2006, 11545 Rockville Athens, AL 35611 North Power Plant Loop Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The date of Mr. Michael Skaggs Richland, WA 99352 this meeting was previously published Site Vice President Mr. Christopher M. Crane in the Federal Register on Tuesday, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 President and Chief Nuclear Officer November 22, 2005 (70 FR 70638). Tennessee Valley Authority AmerGen Energy Company, LLC Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Wednesday, July 12, 2006, Conference Docket No. 50–390 Room T–2b3, Two White Flint North, License No. NPF–90 Docket No. 50–219 License No. DPR–16 Rockville, Maryland Highway 68 Near Spring City 4300 Winfield Road Spring City, TN 37381 8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening Warrenville, IL 60555 Remarks by the ACRS Chairman Mr. Randy Douet Mr. Christopher M. Crane (Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make Site Vice President President and Chief Nuclear Officer opening remarks regarding the conduct Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Exelon Generation Company, LLC of the meeting. Tennessee Valley Authority Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 8:35 a.m.–10 a.m.: Final Review of the Docket Nos. 50–327 and 50–328 and 3 License Renewal Application for the License Nos. DPR–77 and DPR–79 Docket Nos. 50–237 & 50–249 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station 2000 Igou Ferry Road License Nos. DPR–19 &, DPR–25 (Open)—The Committee will hear Soddy Daisy, TN 37379 4300 Winfield Road presentations by and hold discussions Mr. Mano K. Nazar Warrenville, IL 60555 with representatives of the NRC staff Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Mr. Christopher M. Crane and Constellation Energy Company, LLC Officer President and Chief Nuclear Officer regarding the license renewal Indiana Michigan Power Company Exelon Generation Company, LLC application for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Generation Group LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 and the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 Docket Nos. 50–373 & 50–374 associated NRC staff’s final Safety and 2 License Nos. NPF–11 & NPF–18 Evaluation Report. Docket Nos. 50–315 & 50–316 4300 Winfield Road 10:15 a.m.–11:45 a.m.: Results of the License Nos. DPR–58 & DPR–74 Warrenville, IL 60555 Study to Determine the Need for One Cook Place Mr. Christopher M. Crane Establishing Limits for Phosphate Ion Bridgman, MI 49106 President and Chief Nuclear Officer Concentration (Open)—The Committee Mr. Gary Van Middlesworth Exelon Generation Company, LLC will hear presentations by and hold Vice President Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, discussions with representatives of the Duane Arnold Energy Center Units 1 and 2 NRC staff and their contractor regarding Docket No. 50–331 Docket Nos. 50–254 & 50–265 the results of the study for use by the License No. DPR–49 License Nos. DPR–29 & DPR–30 staff in deciding on the need for 4300 Winfield Road 3277 DAEC Road establishing limits for phosphate ion Warrenville, IL 60555 Palo, IA 52324–9785 concentration in groundwater at the Mr. Christopher M. Crane sites of plants applying for license Mr. Donald K. Cobb President and Chief Nuclear Officer Assistant Vice President—Nuclear renewal. Exelon Generation Company, LLC 12:45 p.m.–4 p.m.: Integrating Risk Generation Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 Detroit Edison Company and Safety Margins (Open)—The and 2 Committee will hear presentations by Fermi, Unit 2 Docket Nos. 50–352 & 50–353 and hold discussions with Docket No. 50–341 License Nos. NPF–39 & NPF–85 License No. NPF–43 4300 Winfield Road representatives of the NRC staff 6400 North Dixie Highway Warrenville, IL 60555 regarding a proposed framework for Newport, MI 48166 integrating risk and safety margins. Mr. Christopher M. Crane 4:15 p.m.–4:45 p.m.: Subcommittee Mr. John Conway President and Chief Nuclear Officer Report (Open)—Report by and Site Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC discussions with the chairman of the Nuclear Management Company, LLC Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, ACRS Subcommittee on Thermal- Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Units 2 and 3 Hydraulic Phenomena regarding the Docket No. 50–263 Docket Nos. 50–277 & 50–278 status of activities associated with the License No. DPR–22 License Nos. DPR–44 & DPR–56 resolution of Generic Safety Issue–191— 2807 West County Road 75 4300 Winfield Road Assessment of Debris Accumulation on Monticello, MN 55362–9637 Warrenville, IL 60555 PWR Sump Performance that were Mr. Randall K. Edington [FR Doc. E6–10076 Filed 6–26–06; 8:45 am] discussed during the June 13–14, 2006 Vice President—Nuclear and CNO BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Subcommittee meeting. Nebraska Public Power District 4:45 p.m.–6:45 p.m.: Preparation of Cooper Nuclear Station ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee Docket No. 50–298 NUCLEAR REGULATORY will discuss proposed ACRS reports on License No. DPR–46 COMMISSION matters considered during this meeting. 1200 Prospect Road In addition, the Committee will discuss Brownville, NE 68321 Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Meeting Notice a response to the May 2, 2006 letter Mr. J.V. Parrish from the NRC Executive Director for Chief Executive Officer In accordance with the purposes of Operations, responding to the March 24, Energy Northwest Sections 29 and 182b. of the Atomic 2006 (Revised April 10, 2006) ACRS VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:33 Jun 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 27, 2006 / Notices 36557 report on GSI–191—Assessment of during previous meetings, as time and this service for observing ACRS Debris Accumulation on PWR Sump availability of information permit. meetings should contact Mr. Theron Performance. Procedures for the conduct of and Brown, ACRS Audio Visual Technician participation in ACRS meetings were (301–415–8066), between 7:30 a.m. and Thursday, July 13, 2006, Conference published in the Federal Register on 3:45 p.m., e.t., at least 10 days before the Room T–2b3, Two White Flint North, September 29, 2005 (70 FR 56936). In meeting to ensure the availability of this Rockville, Maryland accordance with those procedures, oral service. Individuals or organizations 8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening or written views may be presented by requesting this service will be Remarks by the ACRS Chairman members of the public, including responsible for telephone line charges (Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make representatives of the nuclear industry. and for providing the equipment and opening remarks regarding the conduct Electronic recordings will be permitted facilities that they use to establish the of the meeting. only during the open portions of the videoteleconferencing link. The 8:35 a.m.–10:30 a.m.: Safeguards and meeting. Persons desiring to make oral availability of videoteleconferencing Security Matters (Closed)—The statements should notify the Cognizant services is not guaranteed. ACRS staff named below five days Committee will hear presentations by Dated: June 22, 2006. and hold discussions with the NRC staff before the meeting, if possible, so that Andrew L. Bates, regarding safeguards and security appropriate arrangements can be made matters. to allow necessary time during the Advisory Committee Management Officer. meeting for such statements. Use of still, [FR Doc. E6–10109 Filed 6–26–06; 8:45 am] [Note: This session will be closed to protect information classified as National Security motion picture, and television cameras BILLING CODE 7590–01–P information as well as safeguards information during the meeting may be limited to pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b (c) (1) and (3)]. selected portions of the meeting as determined by the Chairman. NUCLEAR REGULATORY 10:45 a.m.–11 a.m.: Subcommittee Information regarding the time to be set COMMISSION Report (Open)—The Committee will aside for this purpose may be obtained hear a report by and hold discussions by contacting the Cognizant ACRS staff Sunshine Act Notice with the cognizant Acting Chairman of prior to the meeting. In view of the the ACRS Subcommittee on Digital possibility that the schedule for ACRS DATES: Weeks of June 26, July 3, 10, 17, Instrumentation and Control Systems meetings may be adjusted by the 24, 31, 2006. regarding matters discussed during the Chairman as necessary to facilitate the PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference Subcommittee meeting on June 27, conduct of the meeting, persons Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 2006. planning to attend should check with Maryland. 11 a.m.–12 Noon: Future ACRS the Cognizant ACRS staff if such STATUS: Public and Closed. Activities/Report of the Planning and rescheduling would result in major Procedures Subcommittee (Open)—The inconvenience. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Committee will discuss the In accordance with Subsection 10(d), Week of June 26, 2006 recommendations of the Planning and Pub. L. 92–463, I have determined that Procedures Subcommittee regarding it will be necessary to close a portion of There are no meetings scheduled for items proposed for consideration by the this meeting noted above to discuss and the Week of June 26, 2006. full Committee during future meetings. protect information classified as Week of July 3, 2006—Tentative Also, it will hear a report of the National Security information as well as Planning and Procedures Subcommittee safeguards information pursuant to 5 There are no meetings scheduled for on matters related to the conduct of U.S.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Nuclear Society ANS 3.5
    ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--3.53.5 DiscussionDiscussion OrganizationalOrganizational DefinitionsDefinitions ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembersMembers ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--33--55 UsageUsage UpdateUpdate SummarySummary ofof ChangesChanges ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--3.53.5 OrganizationalOrganizational DefinitionsDefinitions ANSANS -- AmericanAmerican NuclearNuclear SocietySociety ANSIANSI -- AmericanAmerican NationalNational StandardsStandards InstituteInstitute ANSANS--3.53.5 -- WorkingWorking GroupGroup isis comprisedcomprised ofof Industry,Industry, Regulatory,Regulatory, andand Organizational/IndividualOrganizational/Individual VolunteersVolunteers ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembershipMembership ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup BalanceBalance ofof InterestsInterests NRC-1 7% VENDORS-3 20% UTILITY-9 60% ORG-2 13% ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembersMembers ANSANS--3.53.5 OfficersOfficers ListList ChairChair -- TimothyTimothy DennisDennis – Individual (chair of ANS-21/member NFSC executive committee) ViceVice--chairchair -- JimJim FlorenceFlorence – Nebraska Public Power District - Cooper Nuclear Station SecretarySecretary -- KeithKeith WelchelWelchel – Duke Energy - Oconee Nuclear Station EditorEditor -- FF JJ (Butch)(Butch) ColbyColby – L3 Communications MAPPS Inc (formerly CAE) StyleStyle EditorEditor -- WilliamWilliam MM (Mike)(Mike) ShellyShelly – Entergy Services, Inc ParliamentarianParliamentarian –– LawrenceLawrence VickVick – U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission ANSANS--3.53.5 UtilitiesUtilities JamesJames
    [Show full text]
  • Ornl/Nsic-176
    4 ggcBvePBtnc APR 291980 ORNL/NSIC-176 MASTER Descriptions of Selected Accidents that Have Occurred at Nuclear Reactor Facilities H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center NUCLFAR SAFETY INFORMATION CENTER DIEmu'lhj \i 'uNLIMIlt.il c ORNL/NSIC-176 Contract No. W-7405-eng-26 Engineering Technology Division DESCRIPTIONS OF SFLEuTED ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AT NUCLEAR REACTOR FACILITIES H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center Date Published: April 1980 Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORArORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION for the DEPARTMENT OP ENERGY tP MTOWiOtl Cf THIS MCU«»T It IHWWTW iii CONTENTS (7 Page FOREWORD ...» v PREFACE . vli 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. NUCLEAR REACTORS: FUNDAMENTALS .' 3 2.1 Basic Theory 3 2.2 The Components of a Nuclear Reactor 8 2.3 Radioactivity , 11 2.4 Electric Power Plants .... 16 2.5 Classification of Reactors 17 2.6 Light-Water Reactors for the Production of Electricity ..... 19 3. CENTRAL STATION POWER PLANTS. 32 3.1 Fuel Melting Incideat at the Fermi Reactor (1966) 32 3.2 Electrical Cable Fires at San Onofre 1 (1968) 33 3.3 Fuel Meltdown at St. Laurent (1969) 35 3.4 Uncovering of the Core at La Crosse (1970) 38 3.5 Seven Injured When Steam Nozzle Breaks at Robinson 2 (1970) 39 3.6 Discharge of Primary System into Drywell at Did 'en 2 (1970) 42 3.7 Turbine Damage Caused by Human Error at Robinson 2 (1970) 45 3.8 Construction Fire at Indian Point 2 (1971) 46 3.9 Valve Separations at Turkey Point 3 (1971) 47 3.10 Turbine Basement Flooded at Quad Cities V?I2) 48 3.11 Steam Generator Damaged in Hot Tests at Oconee 1 (1972) 49 3.12 Two Fatalities in Steam Line Accident at Surry 1 (1972) 50 3.13 Seawater Intrusion into Primary System at Millstone 1 (1972) ..
    [Show full text]
  • Oconee Nuclear Station, Units No. 1, 2, and 3 Docket No
    Steven M. Snider Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy ON01VP | 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 o: 864.873.3478 f: 864.873.5791 Steve.Snider @duke-energy.com Serial: RA-19-0418 10 CFR 50.55a May 6, 2021 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS NO. 1, 2, AND 3 DOCKET NO. 50-269, 270, AND 50-287 RENEWED LICENSE NO. DPR-38, DPR-47 AND DPR-55 SUBJECT: Proposed Alternative for Inservice Inspection of Containment Post- Tensioning System Components Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1), Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy) requests the NRC to grant relief from Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS), Units 1, 2, and 3. Specifically, Duke Energy is proposing a modification to the scope and schedule currently required by ASME Code requirement IWL-2421(b) for post-tensioning system examinations. Relief is being sought on the basis that the alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. The Relief Request is provided as Enclosure 1 to this letter. If you have questions concerning this request, please contact Art Zaremba, Director - Fleet Licensing, at (980) 373-2062. Sincerely, Steve M Snider. Site Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Enclosure: 1. Relief Request RA-19-0418 cc : L. Dudes, Regional Administrator USNRC Region II J. Nadel, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector – ONS S. Williams, NRR Senior Project Manager – ONS Enclosure 1 Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Relief Request RA-19-0418 (6 pages including cover) 10 CFR 50.55a Relief Request RA-19-0418 Enclosure 1 Page 1 of 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ML12333A320.Pdf
    NLS2012124 Enclosure NLS2012124 ENCLOSURE COOPER NUCLEAR STATION FLOODING WALKDOWN REPORT H Nebraska Public Power District "Always there when you need us" CNS Memo 12-0002 To: Cooper Nuclear Station Licensing Department From: Cooper Nuclear Station Design Engineering Department CC: N/A Date: 11/26/2012 Re: Response to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Section 2.3 Flooding Validation and Acceptance of Vendor Provided Evaluations In response to the nuclear fuel damage at Fukushima Daiichi due to earthquake and subsequent tsunami, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54 (f). As part of this request which is as defined in the Recommendation 2.3, Flooding, Enclosure 4 of the 50.54(f) Letter dated March 12, 2012, CNS was required to perform walkdowns to verify that plant features credited in the current licensing basis (CLB) for protection and mitigation from external flood events is available, functional, and properly maintained. In addition, the purpose of the walkdowns was to identify and address plant-specific degraded, non-conforming, or unanalyzed conditions (through the corrective action program) and associated APM (Available Physical Margin) and verify the adequacy of monitoring and maintenance procedures. This information was obtained in accordance with NEI 12-07, "Guidelines for Verification Walkdowns of Plant Flood Protection Features". This memo is being written for CNS Design Engineering to formally accept the walkdown packages, and final walkdown report as being technically accurate. The walkdowns were developed with APM determined from 906', which is what CNS is committed to the NRC to protect up to.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Facility Siting Using Coalition Opportunity Structures and the Advocacy Coalition Framework
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By KUHIKA GUPTA Norman, Oklahoma 2013 ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BY ______________________________ Dr. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Carol L. Silva, Co-Chair ______________________________ Dr. Christopher M. Weible ______________________________ Dr. Deven E. Carlson ______________________________ Dr. Jill A. Irvine © Copyright by KUHIKA GUPTA 2013 All Rights Reserved. Dedication For my incredible parents, Anil and Alpana Gupta, for making all of this possible, and my husband, Joseph T. Ripberger, for being a constant inspiration. Acknowledgements This dissertation would not be possible were it not for the invaluable support I have received throughout my journey as an undergraduate at Delhi University in India, a graduate student at the University of Warwick in England, and my pursuit of a doctorate at the University of Oklahoma in the United States. During my time at Delhi University, Ramu Manivannan was an amazing mentor who taught me the value of making a difference in both academia and the real world. My greatest debt is to Hank Jenkins-Smith and Carol Silva at the University of Oklahoma, whose encouragement, guidance, and intellectual advice has made this journey possible. I am deeply grateful for their unending support; this dissertation would not exist without them.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Docket Nos
    Shif et T XA04N2075 NUREG-001 U. S. Nuclear Evnedipation Iteport Regulatory Commission related to operation of Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Docket Nos. 50-327 Units and 2 50-328 INIS-XA-N--183 March 1979 Tennessee Valley Authority Available from National Technical Information Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 Price: Printed Cpy$11.75 ; Microfiche 3.00 The price of this document for requesters outside of the North American Continent can be obtained from the National Technical Information Service. NUREG-0011 March 1979 SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PLANT .................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction .............................................................. 1-1 1.2 General Plant Description ................................................. 1-2 1.3 Comparison with Similar Facility Designs .................................. 1-3 1.4 Identification of Agents and Contractors .................................. 1-4 1.5 Summary of Principal Review Matters ....................................... 1-4 1.6 Outstanding Issues ........................................................ 1-5 1.7 Confirmatory Issues ....................................................... 1-6 1.8 Staff Positions - Licensing Conditions .................................... 1-9 1.9 Generic
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-13-493, Nuclear Reactor License Renewal: Nrc
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters May 2013 NUCLEAR REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL NRC Generally Follows Documented Procedures, but Its Revisions to Environmental Review Guidance Have Not Been Timely GAO-13-493 May 2013 NUCLEAR REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL NRC Generally Follows Documented Procedures, but Its Revisions to Environmental Review Guidance Have Not Been Timely Highlights of GAO-13-493, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Many U.S. commercial nuclear power The scope of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) license renewal reactors are reaching the end of their process focuses on managing the effects of aging on a reactor and its associated initial 40-year operating period. To systems, structures, and components (i.e. safety) and assessing certain potential continue operating, their owners must environmental impacts of extending a reactor’s operating-life. As a result, reviews renew their licenses with NRC, the done as part of this process are not required to address as many topics as independent federal agency reviews for initial licensing, which include security and emergency planning. responsible for licensing and regulating nuclear reactors. NRC evaluates NRC has regularly updated the safety review guidance it uses in the license license renewal applications under two renewal process but has not revised most of its environmental review regulations parallel reviews for safety and potential and guidance since they were first issued. NRC has revised its safety review environmental impacts. NRC’s license guidance twice—in 2005 and 2010—and has issued interim updates for selected renewal process has received safety issues between those revisions.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter Of ) ) EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC, ) Docket No. 50-352-LR ) Docket No. 50-353-LR (Limerick Generating Station) ) (License Renewal Application) DECLARATION OF THOMAS B. COCHRAN, Ph.D., MATTHEW G. MCKINZIE, Ph.D. AND CHRISTOPHER J. WEAVER, Ph.D., ON BEHALF OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INTRODUCTION We, Thomas B. Cochran (TBC), Matthew G. McKinzie (MGM), and Christopher J. Weaver (CJW), declare that the following statements are true and correct to the best of our knowledge.1 1. (TBC) My name is Thomas B. Cochran. I received my Ph.D. in Physics from Vanderbilt University in 1967. I am currently a consultant to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) at its Washington, D.C. office. Prior to retiring from NRDC in 2011, I was a senior scientist and held the Wade Greene Chair for Nuclear Policy at NRDC, and was director of its Nuclear Program until 2007. My curriculum vitae is provided in Attachment A. 2. (MGM) My name is Matthew G. McKinzie. I received my Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Pennsylvania in 1995. I am a Senior Scientist in the Nuclear Program and 1 This Declaration is presented jointly by all three of us but in some instances discrete points are offered by only one or two of us. Each paragraph is preceded by the initials of the Declarant(s) who are offering the information contained in that paragraph. Cochran, McKinzie and Weaver Declaration (NRDC), Docket No. 50-352-LR, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mailing List of U.S. Domestic Nuclear Utilities
    Mailing List of Domestic Nuclear Utilities ",Plant .. I Address Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 Vice President, Operations Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc. 1448 S.R. 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 & 2 Eric A. Larson Beaver Valley Power Station P. O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 & 3 Mr. Joseph W. Shea Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Units 1 & 2 George T. Hamrick, Vice President Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P.O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 Byron Station, Units 1 & 2/Braidwood Station, Michael J. Pacilio Units 1 & 2 Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) Exelon -Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 Callaway Plant, Unit 1 Mr. Adam C. Heflin Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Union Electric Company Ameren Missouri P.O. Box 620 -Fulton, MO 65251 Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2 Mr. George H. Gellrich, Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC. Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, MD 20657-4702 Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 & 2 Mr. Kelvin Henderson Site Vice President Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Catawba Nuclear Station 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29745 All -2- Plant Address Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1 Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Rd. Warrenville, IL 60555 Columbia Generating Station Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 97/Tuesday, May 19, 2020/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 19, 2020 / Notices 29981 and all information needed to apply are Date and Time: September 21, 2018; issue and make immediately effective available at the Grants.gov website, 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. any amendment to an operating license https://www.grants.gov/. September 22, 2018, 9:00 a.m.–12:00 or combined license, as applicable, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: p.m. upon a determination by the Questions regarding the funding Place: National Science Foundation, Commission that such amendment opportunity announcements should be 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, involves no significant hazards emailed to Donna Robertson, Harwood VA 22314, Room C9080 (Zoom consideration, notwithstanding the Grants Coordinator, at HarwoodGrants@ Videoconference). pendency before the Commission of a dol.gov or by telephone at 847–725– Type of Meeting: Open. request for a hearing from any person. 7805. Personnel will not be available to Attendance information for the This biweekly notice includes all answer questions after 5:00 p.m., ET. To meeting will be forthcoming on the amendments issued, or proposed to be obtain further information on the Susan website: https://www.nsf.gov/mps/ast/ issued, from April 21, 2020, to May 4, Harwood Training Grant Program, visit aaac.jsp. 2020. The last biweekly notice was the OSHA website at https:// Contact Person: Dr. Christopher published on May 5, 2020. www.osha.gov/harwoodgrants. Davis, Program Director, Division of DATES: Comments must be filed by June Questions regarding Grants.gov should Astronomical Sciences, Suite W 9136, 18, 2020. A request for a hearing or be emailed to [email protected] or National Science Foundation, 2415 petitions for leave to intervene must be directed to Applicant Support toll free Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA filed by July 20, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, Cooper, Diablo, Units 1 and 2
    UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COi\1fJHSSION REGION IV 612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125 9 Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, Docket Nos.: 50-313; 50-368 Cooper Nuclear Station, Docket No.: 50-298 Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, Docket Nos.: 50-275; 50-323 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1,2, and 3, Docket Nos.: 50-528; 50-529; 50-530 SUBJECT: GENERIC FUNDAMENTALS EXAMINATION RESULTS On June 8, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) administered the generic fundamentals examination (GFE) section of the written operator licensing examination to employees of your facility. Enclosed with this letter are copies of both forms of the examination, including answer keys, the grading results for your facility, and copies of the individual answer sheets for each of your employees. Please forvvard the results to the individuals along with the copies of their respective answer sheets. A "P" in the GRADE column indicates that the individual achieved a passing grade of 80 percent or better on the GFE, while an "F" indicates that the individual failed the examination. If you have any questions concerning this examination, please contact Larry Vick at (301) 415-3181. ( Mark S. Haire, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosures: As stated cc w/enclosures: Sherrie Cotton, Training Manager Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc. 1448 S.R. 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Dan Sealock, Acting Manager Nuclear Training Nebraska Public Power District P.O. Box 98 - 2 - Lynn \/Vaiter, Director Learning Services Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diabio Canyon Power Plant P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-13-743, Nuclear Power
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2013 NUCLEAR POWER Analysis of Regional Differences and Improved Access to Information Could Strengthen NRC Oversight GAO-13-743 September 2013 NUCLEAR POWER Analysis of Regional Differences and Improved Access to Information Could Strengthen NRC Oversight Highlights of GAO-13-743, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The 2011 disaster at Japan's The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) relies on its staff’s professional Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power judgment in implementing its processes for overseeing the safety of U.S. Plant demonstrated that unexpected commercial nuclear power reactors. In implementing this oversight, NRC nuclear accidents with extreme allocates specific roles and responsibilities to resident inspectors assigned to consequences can occur and, thus, each plant, regional officials at one of four regional offices responsible for most heightened concerns about NRC’s oversight activities, headquarters officials, and the nuclear power industry. NRC ability to oversee the safety of U.S. also builds into its processes incentives for plant managers to identify concerns commercial nuclear power reactors. about reactor safety, report those concerns to NRC, and take prompt actions to NRC oversees safety through multiple correct them. NRC’s processes for identifying and assessing findings and processes, such as physically violations are based on prescribed agency procedures and include several points inspecting reactors and also responding to signs of declining where NRC staff must exercise their professional judgment, such as determining performance (i.e., findings) or whether issues of concern identified during physical inspections constitute violations of its requirements.
    [Show full text]