Pavement Infrastructures Footprint: the Impact of Pavement Properties on Vehicle Fuel Consumption

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pavement Infrastructures Footprint: the Impact of Pavement Properties on Vehicle Fuel Consumption Pavement Infrastructures Footprint: The Impact of Pavement Properties on Vehicle Fuel Consumption. A. Louhghalam & M. Akbarian & F.-J. Ulm Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States ABSTRACT: A novel mechanistic model based on an infinite beam on elastic foundation is developed to quantify the impact of pavement structural and material properties on pavement deflection and consequently on vehicle fuel consumption. The model can also account for the effect of temperature and vehicle speed on fuel consumption. A simplified expression for evaluating the energy dissipation for practical purposes is proposed and used to investigate the impact of various pavement design systems on fuel consumption. GPS (General Pave- ment Studies) sections from the FHWA’s Long Term Pavement Performance program (FHWA 2011) are used for this study. These sections consist of asphalt concrete (AC), portland cement concrete (PCC) and composite pavements. The model quantifies the impact of temperature and vehicle speed on the fuel consumption and confirms that those impacts are negligible for PCC and significant for AC pavements due to their viscoelasticity. 1 INTRODUCTION on pavement type, but they fail to establish a link be- tween structural and material properties of the pave- Road transportation accounts for 27% of all green- ment and vehicle fuel consumption due to pavement house gas (GHG) emissions in the United States (EPA deflection and there is high uncertainty and variabil- 2012). Hence there is growing interest in development ity within the suggested values. Another restriction of of rigorous mechanistic models for assessing pave- the empirical approach is the measurement precision ment sustainability performance in order to reduce required for determining the relatively small change carbon footprint of the roadway network. One way to in fuel consumption. While the cumulative fuel con- achieve this, is to use Pavement-Vehicle Interaction sumption difference between pavement types can be (PVI) to determine the major contributors to rolling large when measured over the pavement’s service life, resistance and quantify their impact on the environ- the impact for a single vehicle is quite small. Mea- mental footprint of the transportation system. Pave- surements at this scale, thus will be highly influenced ment texture, roughness and deflection are the rele- by external factors affecting both the vehicle and the vant factors contributing to the rolling resistance. The pavement properties and small changes in testing con- dissipated energy and thus fuel consumption due to ditions can affect fuel consumption on the same order the deflection-induced pavement-vehicle interaction as any pavement-type effects. In addition to the above (PVI) depends on the pavement material and struc- reasons the empirical values are not useful for the life tural properties whereas roughness-induced PVI de- cycle assessment of the pavements where a quantita- pends primarily on vehicle characteristics (Zaabar & tive model is necessary to relate the pavement condi- Chatti 2010). Hence the excess fuel consumption due tion to the carbon footprint of the pavement system. to pavement deflection, which is related to pavement In this paper we propose a mechanistic model for properties, is studied herein. deflection-induced PVI that quantifies the impact of Various empirical investigations have examined the pavement material and structure on vehicle fuel con- dependence of pavement type on deflection-induced sumption. In addition, the model also accounts for PVI (Zaniewski et al. (1982) De Graff (1999), Tay- the effect of temperature and vehicle speed on fuel lor et al. (2000), Taylor (2002), Taylor and Pat- consumption by considering pavement viscoelastic- ten (2006), Ardekani and Sumitsawan (2010) and ity. Although the impact of temperature and vehi- VEROAD (2002)). The results of these empirical cle speed is small for PCC pavements, to develop a studies, summarized in Figure 1, suggest the depen- method that can be used for comparative studies in the dence of deflection-induced vehicle fuel consumption roadway network, the model must account for these effects to represent other types of pavements (e.g, vis- dynamics (see for example Coussy 1995 and Ulm & coelastic AC pavements). Coussy 2002 ): The outline of the paper is as follows: the under- dΨ lying theory of the mechanistic model is described = δW 0 (1) in Section 2. In Section 3, the mechanistic model D − dt ≥ is used to evaluate the fuel consumption throughout with: the United States roadway network and effect of var- Z du ious pavement design systems from the Long Term δW = T dS (2) S dt Pavement Performance program’s General Pavement · Studies (GPS) sections (FHWA (2011)) is studied. the external power supplied to the system, Ψ the The designs include two types of asphalt concrete (Helmholtz) free energy and u = wez the beam de- (AC) pavements; two types of composite pavements; flection. The total (Lagrangian) derivative− d=dt in the and three types of Portland cement concrete (PCC) above for any function f of time and space subjected pavement designs. Finally, Section 4 summarizes the to velocity field V reads as: findings of this study. df @f = + V f (3) dt @t · r 2 THEORETICAL ANALYSIS with representing the gradient vector. In the above movingr coordinate system and under steady-state Consider a pavement structure subjected to a load condition (where @f=@t = 0) one can show that the which moves with the constant speed c. To maintain change in free energy is zero (Louhghalam et al. this speed, the energy dissipated due to the viscoelas- 2013a) and the dissipation rate for an infinite beam ticity of the beam is compensated by the extra power on elastic foundation can be obtained as: provided by the vehicle, leading to excess fuel con- Z @w sumption. = δW = c p dS 0 (4) D − S @X ≥ If the traction on the beam is approximately sub- 2.1 Dissipated energy stituted by the resultant concentrated load P = R pdS the dissipation rate can be simplified as = One way to calculate the dissipated energy, i.e. the S cbP dw=dX with b the width of the beam. ForD the amount of energy which is not recoverable and is lost elastic− case where there is no dissipation, the slope in heat form, is through calculation of viscoelastic is zero at pavement-tire contact point, confirming that stresses and strains in the viscoelastic layer, in a fixed the maximum displacement occurs exactly below the coordinate system x, as the load (tire) passes the pave- tire. Furthermore the non-negativity of the dissipation ment, using computational methods such as finite el- rate requires that dw=dX 0 which indicates that the ement analysis (Pouget et al. (2011)), and integration tire is on an upward slope≤ as shown in Figure 2 (b) over the entire pavement block. To minimize the ef- (Flugge¨ 1967). fect of boundary conditions the pavement block must The above analysis indicates that for evaluating the be sufficiently large. In another approach used herein, dissipated energy one only needs to find the displace- the displacement field is calculated in a coordinate ment profile at the tire-pavement contact surface in system X which moves with the tire at a constant the moving coordinate system. speed c, i.e. X = x ct where t is the time variable. In presence of damping,− due to the viscoelasticity of the material, the deflection profile becomes asymmetrical 2.2 Viscoelastic beam on elastic foundation and the maximum deflection moves behind the load. Let h be the thickness of the infinite viscoelastic beam Therefore the wheel is always on an uphill slope, re- and k be the Winkler modulus of the elastic founda- sulting in excess rolling resistance (Flugge¨ 1967). Us- tion. The viscoelasticity of the beam is modeled us- ing the second law of thermodynamics, in (Louhgha- ing the Maxwell model with stiffness E and viscosity lam et al. 2013a) the authors proved theoretically that η (see the inset of Figure 2(a)) for which the consti- the two approaches described above are strictly equiv- tutive equation is σ + τσ_ = τE_, where τ = ηE is alent and the only difference between the two is the the relaxation time of the viscoelastic material that reference frame. The first approach uses a fixed co- varies with temperature, leading to temperature de- ordinate system attached to the pavement while the pendent mechanical properties for viscoelastic mate- latter considers a moving reference frame attached to rial. The time-temperature superposition principle is the tire-pavement contact surface. used to establish this temperature dependance and to Let the pavement structure be an infinite viscoelas- find the relaxation time of the material at any given tic beam on an elastic foundation subjected to a dis- temperature T from the relaxation time measured at a tributed load T = pez moving at a constant speed reference temperature T : c in x-direction (see− Figure 2). The dissipation rate ref can be evaluated from the second law of thermo- τ(T ) = aT τ(Tref ) (5) D × 5 4 3 2 1 0 Excess fuel consumption (Ltr/100Km) -1 (90) (100) (60) (80) (100) (60) (100) (60) (60) (100) (60) Speed (Km/h) NPC 1999 NRC I De Graaff De Graaff 1982 (cars) 2010 (cars) 2010 (cars) Taylor et. al Taylor 2006 (cars) 1982 (trucks) 2000 (truck) 2006 (truck) 2010 (truck) 2000 (truck) 2002 (truck) Zaniewski et. al Zaniewski et. al 2006 (full truck) Taylor and Patten Taylor and Patten Taylor and Patten Taylor Taylor and Patten Taylor Zaabar and Chatti Zaabar and Chatti Taylor 2002 (truck) Taylor Taylor 2002
Recommended publications
  • Fuel Dealer Supplemental Application
    FUEL DEALER SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION Applicant: Address: Owner and/or Manager responsible for daily operations: Website: FEIN: US DOT #: Date established: Proposed policy effective date: Business type: Sole Proprietor C-Corporation S-Corporation Partnership Current Carrier Line of Coverage Current Premiums Business Operations (check all that apply) Auto Service & Repair Convenience Stores HVAC Installation or Repair Bulk Oil Sales Fuel Distributor/Dealer LP Bulk Storage Bulk Storage (gas, diesel) Home Heating Fuel Propane Distributor Common Carrier Other: 1. Any other entities, subsidiaries, joint ventures or partnerships associated with applicant? Yes No 2. What is the name and title of individual responsible for safety program? How many years of experience in this role? Contact information: SECTION I – FUEL DEALER GENERAL INFORMATION 1. How many years has current management been in place? 2. Has there been a merger or acquisition with another business entity within the past 3 years? Yes No 3. Does the Applicant have formal hiring practices to include: a. Documented interviews? Yes No b. Formal background checks? Yes No c. Reference checks? Yes No 4. Does the Applicant business include any of the following: a. Any fuel brought in by or delivered to boats or barges? Yes No b. Any hauling, storage, and/or disposal of waste oil, pool water, or asphalt? Yes No c. Any sale of racing fuel? Yes No If Yes: % d. Any direct fueling of aircraft? Yes No e. Any direct fueling of watercraft? Yes No f. Any direct fueling of locomotives? Yes No g. Any operations involving anhydrous ammonia? Yes No h. Any operations related to converting vehicles to propane power for Applicant’s use or other’s? Yes No i.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Basics: the Facts About Bioenergy 1 We Rely on Energy Every Day
    Biomass Basics: The Facts About Bioenergy 1 We Rely on Energy Every Day Energy is essential in our daily lives. We use it to fuel our cars, grow our food, heat our homes, and run our businesses. Most of our energy comes from burning fossil fuels like petroleum, coal, and natural gas. These fuels provide the energy that we need today, but there are several reasons why we are developing sustainable alternatives. 2 We are running out of fossil fuels Fossil fuels take millions of years to form within the Earth. Once we use up our reserves of fossil fuels, we will be out in the cold - literally - unless we find other fuel sources. Bioenergy, or energy derived from biomass, is a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels because it can be produced from renewable sources, such as plants and waste, that can be continuously replenished. Fossil fuels, such as petroleum, need to be imported from other countries Some fossil fuels are found in the United States but not enough to meet all of our energy needs. In 2014, 27% of the petroleum consumed in the United States was imported from other countries, leaving the nation’s supply of oil vulnerable to global trends. When it is hard to buy enough oil, the price can increase significantly and reduce our supply of gasoline – affecting our national security. Because energy is extremely important to our economy, it is better to produce energy in the United States so that it will always be available when we need it. Use of fossil fuels can be harmful to humans and the environment When fossil fuels are burned, they release carbon dioxide and other gases into the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Properties Comparison
    Alternative Fuels Data Center Fuel Properties Comparison Compressed Liquefied Low Sulfur Gasoline/E10 Biodiesel Propane (LPG) Natural Gas Natural Gas Ethanol/E100 Methanol Hydrogen Electricity Diesel (CNG) (LNG) Chemical C4 to C12 and C8 to C25 Methyl esters of C3H8 (majority) CH4 (majority), CH4 same as CNG CH3CH2OH CH3OH H2 N/A Structure [1] Ethanol ≤ to C12 to C22 fatty acids and C4H10 C2H6 and inert with inert gasses 10% (minority) gases <0.5% (a) Fuel Material Crude Oil Crude Oil Fats and oils from A by-product of Underground Underground Corn, grains, or Natural gas, coal, Natural gas, Natural gas, coal, (feedstocks) sources such as petroleum reserves and reserves and agricultural waste or woody biomass methanol, and nuclear, wind, soybeans, waste refining or renewable renewable (cellulose) electrolysis of hydro, solar, and cooking oil, animal natural gas biogas biogas water small percentages fats, and rapeseed processing of geothermal and biomass Gasoline or 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 1.12 B100 1 gal = 0.74 GGE 1 lb. = 0.18 GGE 1 lb. = 0.19 GGE 1 gal = 0.67 GGE 1 gal = 0.50 GGE 1 lb. = 0.45 1 kWh = 0.030 Diesel Gallon GGE GGE 1 gal = 1.05 GGE 1 gal = 0.66 DGE 1 lb. = 0.16 DGE 1 lb. = 0.17 DGE 1 gal = 0.59 DGE 1 gal = 0.45 DGE GGE GGE Equivalent 1 gal = 0.88 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 0.93 DGE 1 lb. = 0.40 1 kWh = 0.027 (GGE or DGE) DGE DGE B20 DGE DGE 1 gal = 1.11 GGE 1 kg = 1 GGE 1 gal = 0.99 DGE 1 kg = 0.9 DGE Energy 1 gallon of 1 gallon of 1 gallon of B100 1 gallon of 5.66 lb., or 5.37 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Production by Fuel
    EN27 Electricity production by fuel Key message Fossil fuels and nuclear energy continue to dominate the fuel mix for electricity production despite their risk of environmental impact. This impact was reduced during the 1990s with relatively clean natural gas becoming the main choice of fuel for new plants, at the expense of oil, in particular. Production from coal and lignite has increased slightly in recent years but its share of electricity produced has been constant since 2000 as overall production increases. The steep increase in overall electricity production has also counteracted some of the environmental benefits from fuel switching. Rationale The trend in electricity production by fuel provides a broad indication of the impacts associated with electricity production. The type and extent of the related environmental pressures depends upon the type and amount of fuels used for electricity generation as well as the use of abatement technologies. Fig. 1: Gross electricity production by fuel, EU-25 5,000 4,500 4,000 Other fuels 3,500 Renewables 1.4% 3,000 13.7% Nuclear 2,500 TWh Natural and derived 31.0% gas 2,000 Coal and lignite 1,500 19.9% Oil 1,000 29.5% 500 4.5% 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2010 2020 2030 Data Source: Eurostat (Historic data), Primes Energy Model (European Commission 2006) for projections. Note: Data shown are for gross electricity production and include electricity production from both public and auto-producers. Renewables includes electricity produced from hydro (excluding pumping), biomass, municipal waste, geothermal, wind and solar PV.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Power -- What Is It? It=S a Form of Energy … a Renewable Resource
    INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric Power -- what is it? It=s a form of energy … a renewable resource. Hydropower provides about 96 percent of the renewable energy in the United States. Other renewable resources include geothermal, wave power, tidal power, wind power, and solar power. Hydroelectric powerplants do not use up resources to create electricity nor do they pollute the air, land, or water, as other powerplants may. Hydroelectric power has played an important part in the development of this Nation's electric power industry. Both small and large hydroelectric power developments were instrumental in the early expansion of the electric power industry. Hydroelectric power comes from flowing water … winter and spring runoff from mountain streams and clear lakes. Water, when it is falling by the force of gravity, can be used to turn turbines and generators that produce electricity. Hydroelectric power is important to our Nation. Growing populations and modern technologies require vast amounts of electricity for creating, building, and expanding. In the 1920's, hydroelectric plants supplied as much as 40 percent of the electric energy produced. Although the amount of energy produced by this means has steadily increased, the amount produced by other types of powerplants has increased at a faster rate and hydroelectric power presently supplies about 10 percent of the electrical generating capacity of the United States. Hydropower is an essential contributor in the national power grid because of its ability to respond quickly to rapidly varying loads or system disturbances, which base load plants with steam systems powered by combustion or nuclear processes cannot accommodate. Reclamation=s 58 powerplants throughout the Western United States produce an average of 42 billion kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, enough to meet the residential needs of more than 14 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Metered Fuel Consumption.Docx
    Report 3: Metered fuel consumption Including annex on high energy users Prepared by BRE on behalf of the Department of Energy and Climate Change December 2013 BRE report number 286734 The EFUS has been undertaken by BRE on behalf of the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). Report editors and lead authors: Jack Hulme, Adele Beaumont and Claire Summers. Project directed by: John Riley and Jack Hulme. Data manager: Mike Kay. Supporting authors and analysts: Mike Kay, Busola Siyanbola, Tad Nowak, Peter Iles, Andrew Gemmell, John Hart, John Henderson, Afi Adjei, Lorna Hamilton, Caroline Buchanan, Helen Garrett, Charlotte Turner, Sharon Monahan, Janet Utley, Sara Coward, Vicky Yan & Matt Custard. Additional thanks to the wider team of reviewers and contributors at BRE, DECC and elsewhere, including GfK NOP Social Research, Gemini Data Loggers, Consumer Futures, G4S, Eon, British Gas, and for the input of the Project Steering Group and Peer Reviewers. Executive Summary This report presents the results from an analysis of the median gas and electricity consumptions derived from the 2011 Energy Follow-Up Survey (EFUS). The 2011 EFUS consisted of a follow-up interview survey and associated monitoring of a sub-set of households first visited as part of the 2010/2011 English Housing Survey (EHS). Analysis is based on the meter reading sub-sample weighted to the national level, using a weighting factor specific to the meter reading sub-sample. The results presented in this report are therefore representative of the English housing stock, with a population of 21.9 million households. § The meter reading data reveals a wide range in energy consumption across the household stock1.
    [Show full text]
  • On Alternative Energy Hydroelectric Power
    Focus On Alternative Energy Hydroelectric Power What is Hydroelectric Power (Hydropower)? Hydroelectric power comes from the natural flow of water. The energy is produced by the fall of water turning the blades of a turbine. The turbine is connected to a generator that converts the energy into electricity. The amount of electricity a system can produce depends on the quantity of water passing through a turbine (the volume of water flow) and the height from which the water ‘falls’ (head). The greater the flow and the head, the more electricity produced. Why Wind? Hydropower is a clean, domestic, and renewable source of energy. It provides inexpensive electricity and produces no pollution. Unlike fossil fuels, hydropower does not destroy water during the production of electricity. Hydropower is the only renewable source of energy that can replace fossil fuels’ electricity production while satisfying growing energy needs. Hydroelectric systems vary in size and application. Micro-hydroelectric plants are the smallest types of hydroelectric systems. They can generate between 1 kW and 1 MW of power and are ideal for powering smaller services such as processing machines, small farms, and communities. Large hydroelectric systems can produce large amounts of electricity. These systems can be used to power large communities and cities. Why Hydropower? Technical Feasibility Hydropower is the most energy efficient power generator. Currently, hydropower is capable of converting 90% of the available energy into electricity. This can be compared to the most efficient fossil fuel plants, which are only 60% efficient. The principal advantages of using hydropower are its large renewable domestic resource base, the absence of polluting emissions during operation, its capability in some cases to respond quickly to utility load demands, and its very low operating costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Scooptram® ST710 Technical Specification
    Atlas Copco Underground Loaders Scooptram® ST710 Technical specification The ST710 is a compact 6.5 metric ton Scooptram with an ergonomically designed operator’s compartment especially for narrow-vein mining. Features Load frame Power frame • A Z-bar front-end for efficient loading and mucking • Atlas Copco unique powertrain including an upbox, and • An aggressively designed “high shape” factor bucket, re- a transverter (a combined transmission and converter) - ducing the need for multiple passes to fill the bucket allowing space for the “footbox” plus a low and short rear • Easy to change bucket and cylinders with split-cap pin end retention system • Electronic transverter and engine control systems for • Boom support and lock for safe work under boom smooth and precise shifting • A high power-to-weight ratio complemented by a fully Operator’s compartment integrated powertrain, automatically matching the gear Ergonomically and spacious designed compartment for selection to the load - producing a high tractive effort maximum safety and minimal operator fatigue with: without wheel spin • maximized legroom because of the Atlas Copco’s • Stacked V-core radiator and charge air cooler: easy to re- “footbox” place damaged tubes and to clean • comfortable operator’s seat offering improved ergonomic positioning, body orientation and generous shoulder and General hip room • Great serviceability with centralized service points • compliant with sound and vibration regulations to mini- • Long-life roller bearing centre hinge mize operator’s fatigue;
    [Show full text]
  • FUEL LOAD ESTIMATION GUIDE for South Carolina
    For Prescribed Burning In South Carolina FUELFUEL LOADLOAD ESTIMATIONESTIMATION GUIDEGUIDE FOR SOUTH CAROLINA FOR SOUTH CAROLINA FUEL LOAD ESTIMATION GUIDE for South Carolina To comply with Smoke Management Guidelines for VegetaƟve Debris Burning OperaƟons in the State of South Carolina, land managers that ulize prescribed fire to accomplish resource objecves for agriculture, wildlife management, or forest management purposes are required to esmate the tons of fuel that will be consumed on each site when making noficaon to the SC Forestry Commission. Esmang the total tons of fuel present on the site is oen difficult for novice burners. This guide was developed to provide a visual reference for burners to aid them in the fuel load esmaon process. The photographs in this document were taken during a fuel load study conducted by the SC Forestry Commission. In the study, plots were taken in various fuel types across the state. In each plot, the vegetaon and lier were collected, oven dried, and weighed to calculate the total tons per acre on each study site. To accurately esmate fuel loading: Choose a fuel type from the fuel loading chart or from the photos provided that most closely matches the fuels present in the area you plan to burn. The fuel type used to esƟmate fuel loading should represent the fuel on site that will be the main carrier of the fire. Using the Typical Fuel Loadings chart (available in this reference guide or in the Smoke Management Guidelines) or the reference photos in this document, decide if the site you plan to burn has 1 Low, Medium, or High fuel loading.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Fuel Hunt Adapted from “Fossil Fuels and the Ticking Clock” At
    Issue 7: Energy and the Polar Environment http://beyondpenguins.nsdl.org/ Fossil Fuel Hunt adapted from “Fossil Fuels and the Ticking Clock” at www.powerhousekids.com You’ve been hired by an energy company to find coal deposits. The coal you find will be burned to produce electricity for homes and businesses. Coal and natural gas are known as fossil fuels. They are formed from the remains of ancient plants and animals. When the plants and animals died and became buried deep in the earth, the heat and pressure of the earth’s layers slowly transformed them into coal, natural gas, and oil. In this activity, you will search for pennies four times. You only have 30 seconds to search each time! After each search, you will count the pennies, record the total, and deposit them in the correctly numbered cup. After the fourth search, you will recount each cup of pennies one at a time, and make a bar graph to show the number of pennies you found in each search. First search: __________ Second search: ____________ Third search: ___________ Fourth search: __________ Copyright 2008: Ohio State University. Funded by the National Science Foundation. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Issue 7: Energy and the Polar Environment http://beyondpenguins.nsdl.org/ 45 35 Number of pennies found 25 15 5 1st 2nd 3rd 4th search search search search Questions: 1. In which search did you find the most pennies? 2. In which search did you find the least pennies? 3. Why do you think it became increasingly harder to find pennies? 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Fuels? Beside Each Sentence Below, Write Down Whether It Is Talking About Coal, Oil, Or Natural Gas
    Puzzles & Word Games Coal, Oil or Natural Gas? How well do you know your fossil fuels? Beside each sentence below, write down whether it is talking about coal, oil, or natural gas. Watch out! Some may have more than one answer. Name the Fossil Fuel 1. There is probably enough of this fossil fuel to last another 200 years. 2. Started out as plankton (tiny plants and animals) millions of years ago. 3. This fossil fuel provides about 40% of the world’s energy. 4. In its early stages this fossil fuel is a spongy brown material called peat. 5. This fossil fuel provides about 40% of the world's electricity. 6. This fossil fuel produces more carbon dioxide than any other fossil fuel. 7. Before people can use this fossil fuel it is cleaned and separated at a special factory called a refinery. 8. Using this fossil fuel contributes to global warming. 9. More than half of this fossil fuel comes from the Middle East. 10. This fossil fuel burns the hottest, which makes it the most efficient for making electricity. ecokids.ca Puzzles & Word Games Coal, Oil or Natural Gas? How well do you know your fossil fuels? Beside each sentence below, write down whether it is talking about coal, oil, or natural gas. Watch out! Some may have more than one answer. Name the Fossil Fuel Coal 1. There is probably enough of this fossil fuel to last another 200 years. Oil & Natural gas 2. Started out as plankton (tiny plants and animals) millions of years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Fusion Energy
    Introduction to Fusion Energy Jerry Hughes IAP @ PSFC January 8, 2013 Acknowledgments: Catherine Fiore, Jeff Freidberg, Martin Greenwald, Zach Hartwig, Alberto Loarte, Bob Mumgaard, Geoff Olynyk Presenter’s e-mail: [email protected] Questions to answer • What is fusion? • Why do we need it? • How do we get it on earth? • Where do we stand? • Where are we headed? What is fusion, anyway? What is fusion, anyway? What is fusion, anyway? What is fusion, anyway? Fusion is a form of nuclear energy E mc2 • A huge amount of energy is released when isotopes lighter than iron combine to form heavier nuclei, with less final mass • It is an ubiquitous energy source in the universe • It is not (yet) a practical energy source on earth Fusion is a form of nuclear energy E mc2 • A huge amount of energy is released when isotopes lighter than iron combine to form heavier nuclei, with less final mass • It is an ubiquitous energy source in the universe • It is not (yet) a practical energy source on earth Terrestrial energy sources have their origin in the nuclear fusion reactions of stars Supernova produces radioactive elements Solar heating of the Earth drives atmospheric circulation, water cycle Sun illuminates Earth Terrestrial energy sources have their origin in the nuclear fusion reactions of stars Geothermal Decay of radioactive particles generates heat in Earth’s interior Nuclear fission Supernova produces radioactive elements Splitting radioactive particles generates heat Solar heating of the Earth drives atmospheric circulation, water cycle
    [Show full text]