Marston Parish 1654-1674: a Community Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marston Parish 1654-1674: a Community Study W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1996 Marston Parish 1654-1674: A Community Study Jane Dillon McKinney College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation McKinney, Jane Dillon, "Marston Parish 1654-1674: A Community Study" (1996). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626035. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-pkee-f913 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARSTON PARISH 1654-1674: A COMMUNITY STUDY A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Jane Dillon McKinney 1996 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, November 1996 Norman F. Barka Kathleen J. Bragdon Kevin P. K In memory of my father, Donald L. McKinney TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii ABSTRACT viii INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER I. SETTLEMENT PATTERN 13 CHAPTER II. THE MARSTON PARISH COMMUNITY 42 CHAPTER III. THE NEIGHBORHOODS IN MARSTON PARISH 75 CHAPTER IV THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT THE HEAD OF QUEENS CREEK 99 CHAPTER V CONCLUSION 145 APPENDIX 1 MARSTON PARISH BURIAL REGISTER 157 APPENDIX 2 COMPUTER ENCODING FORM FOR MERGE 164 DOCUMENTS APPENDIX 3 MARSTON PARISH LAND TRANSACTIONS AND 165 PATENTS BIBLIOGRAPHY 169 VITA 178 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Several groups helped make this thesis possible. I would like to thank the following people in particular: The staff at the Department of Historical Research, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation cheerfully answered my often naive questions. Linda Rowe, Lou Powers, Julie Richter, Ann Smart Martin and Jennifer Jones patiently explained both the nature of historical research and the mysteries of the seventeenth century sources. My committee’s careful reading and their stimulating critiques helped me to focus and sharpen points that had been buried in my prose. This thesis had its genesis in a paper that I wrote for Dr. Kathleen Bragdon’s class in Documentary Archaeology. Following up on her suggestions to contextualize and compare, I consulted with Dr. Kevin Kelly, who helped form my research questions and pointed out where the information could be found. Dr. Norman Barka shepherded me through the thesis process. Without the cooperation of my family, I could not have written this thesis. They know their many and varied contributions. My love and gratitude to my mother, Katherine Dillon Brawner; to my daughters and their husbands, Jane and Michael Cullipher, Catherine and Yasutoshi Suzuki; and to my sons, David and Edward Currier. Last, but not least, thanks to Elizabeth Frith Woods, who opened the door to seventeenth-century life in Virginia and lured me inside. v LIST OF TABLES TABLE Page 1. Marston Parish Deaths by Year 65 2. Marston Parish Land Certificates 67 3. Marston Parish Deaths by Month 69 4. Marston Parish Deaths by Status 71 5. Marston Parish Deaths by Month and Sex 73 vi LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE Page 1. Marston Parish 1654 - 1660 21 2. Marston Parish 1660 - 1670 23 3. Marston Parish 1670 - 1674 25 4. Landmarks in Marston Parish 27 5. Property that Descended through Female Heirs or Was Controlled by Women in Marston Parish 82 6. 1650s Neighborhood Network at the Head of Queens Creek 100 7. Map of the 1650s Neighborhood at the Head of Queens Creek 102 8. County and Colony Level Officials 128 9. Local Level Officials 129 Vll ABSTRACT Marston Parish in York County, Virginia, existed as separate entity from 1654 to 1674. This study uses microlevel analyses of settlement patterns, community and neighborhood formation, and ethnographic data to test the proposition that Marston Parish was an area of cultural transition, neither frontier nor wholly incorporated into the established ecclesiastical or legal structures of the lower James-York peninsula. The Marston years marked the beginning of property subdivision and the agglomeration of smaller plantations into neighborhoods. While the neighborhood at the head of Queens Creek achieved maturity and a sense of self-identity, the northern neighborhood at the head of Skimino Creek was just beginning to become an aggregate. The population associated more closely within neighborhoods than between neighborhoods or at the parish level. Due to institutional failure, Marston Parish did not function as a centralizing force in the community, but rather as a socioeconomic and political factor that was used by individuals to promote their own interests. Demographics thwarted the entrenchment of a transplanted gentry. An ethnographic history of the neighborhood at the head of Queens Creek examines the processes of change and adaptation to the reality of the New World and the important role that women played in the formation of new communities. Studies of other Virginia parishes and counties in the Chesapeake area, in comparison to Marston, illuminate the minutiae of the local level. Because Marston joined with Middletown Parish to become Bruton Parish in Williamsburg, Marston Parish provides a singular insight into cultural change during the early years of the Middle Peninsula. viii MARSTON PARISH 1654 - 1674 A COMMUNITY STUDY INTRODUCTION “History is culturally ordered, differently so in different societies, according to meaningful schemes of things. The converse is also true: cultural schemes are historically ordered, since to a greater or lesser extent the meanings are revalued as they are practically enacted. The synthesis of these contraries unfolds in the creative action of the historic subjects, the people concerned” (Sahlins 1985 :vii). When the General Assembly created Marston Parish between Queens and Skimino Creek in 1654, it also decreed that the upper part of York County, from Skimino Creek to the heads of the Pamunkey and Mattaponi Rivers, would be called New Kent County. Thus, at its very founding, Marston was simultaneously incorporated into the ecclesiastical system and separated from the new frontier that had moved inland to what was to be New Kent County. During the twenty years that Marston Parish existed as a discrete entity, before joining with Middletown Parish to become Bruton Parish in 1674, the transitional nature of its culture is evident. Because Marston only existed while it was in a state of transition between the freedoms of the frontier and the conventions of colonial life, it allows a close examination of the process of change. Before it became a parish, Marston, with a dispersed, sparse population, was very much a frontier area that lay outside the palisade that spanned the Middle Peninsula. Even after the General Assembly created Marston as a parish, it remained relatively free from the oversight of the church and the court or colonial government. Due to these institutional failures, Marston offered an opportune area for what Marshall Sahlins has called, “‘structural transformation,’ since the alteration of some meanings changes the positional relations among the cultural categories” (Sahlins 2 3 1985: vii). And, although all the land had been patented or bought up, fresh chances still seemed possible; for its youthful population, Marston would have retained an environment that would have encouraged the growth of democracy, capitalism and individualism, according to the Turner frontier thesis. The period during which Marston Parish existed was one of flux in York County as a whole. The composition of the population changed, probably due to outmigration, and ownership of servants, black and white, more than doubled. Variations in tobacco prices and reduced productivity of nutrient-depleted tobacco fields occurred. These demographic and economic factors affected Marston Parish. The owners of large land patents began to die or to sell their property. The resulting subdivision of property, in turn, permitted the formation of the neighborhood at the head of Queens Creek during the 1650s, and, later, in the 1670s, the establishment of what would become a Quaker community on the south shore of Skimino Creek. The formation of these neighborhoods within the parish community set the stage for the contest between the forces of individualism and capitalism with those of the community. In 1606, the London Company had issued instructions to the first settlers: “The way to prosper and to Obtain Good Success is to make yourselves all of one mind for the Good of your Country and your own, and to Serve and fear God, the Giver of all goodness...” (Billings 1975:22). Material success was the primary concern, as was self; God and unity were means to that end. The London Company’s creed had a lasting influence in Virginia. Breen (1980) regards this as a dysfunctional and variant aspect of English culture that only became viable in the context of tobacco cultivation. The jousting for position and property that had first occurred both among the English themselves and 4 with the Native Americans became refined as social status and position came increasingly to include partaking in responsible roles in the community. The resulting tension was due, in a sense, to the colonists colonializing themselves; they created their own positions within new forms of community in the uncertainty of the New World. This study of Marston Parish addresses, at the microlevel, both Chesapeake and York County settlement patterns, demographic analyses, community and neighborhood studies, and includes an ethnographic history of the neighborhood at the head of Queens Creek as seen through the court record of one litigious woman, Elizabeth Woods.
Recommended publications
  • Nomination Form
    VLR Listing - 9/6/2006 Vi-/-· 11/1,/1, NRHP Listing - 11/3/2006 ,·~ (-µ{ :.,1(1-i C ' ,ps Form 10·900 0."\18 :\'o. !024-4018 \Ill',·. 10·90) 11. S. Department or the lnh.·:r-ior Town of Bermuda Hundred Historic District ~ational Park Sen'ice Chesterfield Co .. VA '.\TATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This ronn is for use in nomir,ating or requesting d~enninations for individual properties and districts. See instruction.~ in l-lo~vto Complete the National Rcg1sler ofHi~tor1c Places Registration Forrn {National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each Hem by marking "x" in the appropnate box or bycntcnng :he information requcs!cd IC any item does not apply to the property bein~ documented, enter "NIA" for "no: applicable." For functions, architectural ,·las.~ification, nrnteriu!s, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative •terns on con1inuat1011 sheets (NPS Form J 0·900a). Use a t)i)ewflter, word processor, or eompuler, lo complete all items. I. Name of Pro ert ' Historic t<ame: Town ofBennuda Hundred Historic District other names/site number VDHR #020-0064 2. Location street & number_~B~o~t~h~s~id~e~s~o=f~B~e~nn=u~d~•~H=u~n~d~re~d~•n~d~A~l~li~e~d~R~o~a~d~s~______ not for publication ___ _ city or town Chester vicinity_,~X~-- :itate Virginia code VA eounty Chesterfield ____ code 041 Zip _2382 J 3. State/Federal Agency Certification !\s the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, J hereby certify that lhis _x_ nomina11on __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering propenies in the Narional Register ofHmoric Place~ and meets the procedural and professional requirements sel forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • VMI History Fact Sheet
    VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE Founded in 1839, Virginia Military Institute is the nation’s first state-supported military college. U.S. News & World Report has ranked VMI among the nation’s top undergraduate public liberal arts colleges since 2001. For 2018, Money magazine ranked VMI 14th among the top 50 small colleges in the country. VMI is part of the state-supported system of higher education in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The governor appoints the Board of Visitors, the Institute’s governing body. The superintendent is the chief executive officer. WWW.VMI.EDU HISTORY OF VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE 540-464-7230 INSTITUTE OFFICERS On Nov. 11, 1839, 23 young Virginians were history. On May 15, 1863, the Corps of mustered into the service of the state and, in Cadets escorted Jackson’s remains to his Superintendent a falling snow, the first cadet sentry – John grave in Lexington. Just before the Battle of Gen. J.H. Binford Peay III B. Strange of Scottsville, Va. – took his post. Chancellorsville, in which he died, Jackson, U.S. Army (retired) Today the duty of walking guard duty is the after surveying the field and seeing so many oldest tradition of the Institute, a tradition VMI men around him in key positions, spoke Deputy Superintendent for experienced by every cadet. the oft-quoted words: “The Institute will be Academics and Dean of Faculty Col. J.T.L. Preston, a lawyer in Lexington heard from today.” Brig. Gen. Robert W. Moreschi and one of the founders of VMI, declared With the outbreak of the war, the Cadet Virginia Militia that the Institute’s unique program would Corps trained recruits for the Confederate Deputy Superintendent for produce “fair specimens of citizen-soldiers,” Army in Richmond.
    [Show full text]
  • From the General History of Virginia John Smith What Happened Till the First Supply
    from The General History of Virginia John Smith What Happened Till the First Supply John Smith himself wrote this account of the early months of the Jamestown settlement. For that reason, he may be trying to make his actions seem even braver and more selfless than they were. As you read, stay alert for evidence of exaggerating by Smith. Being thus left to our fortunes, it fortuned1 that within ten days, scarce ten amongst us could either go2 or well stand, such extreme weakness and sickness oppressed us. And thereat none need marvel if they consider the cause and reason, which was this: While the ships stayed, our allowance was somewhat bettered by a daily proportion of biscuit which the sailors would pilfer to sell, give, or exchange with us for money, sassafras,3 or furs. But when they departed, there remained neither tavern, beer house, nor place of relief but the common kettle.4 Had we been as free from all sins as gluttony and drunkenness we might have been canonized for saints, but our President5 would never have been admitted for engrossing to his private,6 oatmeal, sack,7 oil, aqua vitae,8 beef, eggs, or what not but the kettle; that indeed he allowed equally to be distributed, and that was half a pint of wheat and as much barley boiled with water for a man a day, and this, having fried some twenty-six weeks in the ship's hold, contained as many worms as grains so that we might truly call it rather so much bran than corn; our drink was water, our lodgings castles in the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Neck Land Proprietary Records
    The Virginia government always held legal jurisdiction over the area owned by the proprietary, so all court actions are found within the records of the counties that comprised it. The Library holds local records such Research Notes Number 23 as deeds, wills, orders, loose papers, and tax records of these counties, and many of these are on microfilm and available for interlibrary loan. Researchers will find that the proprietary records provide a unique doc- umentary supplement to the extant records of this region. The history of Virginia has been enriched by their survival. Northern Neck Land Proprietary Records Introduction The records of the Virginia Land Office are a vital source of information for persons involved in genealog- ical and historical research. Many of these records are discussed in Research Notes Number 20, The Virginia Land Office. Not discussed are the equally rich and important records of the Northern Neck Land Proprietary, also known as the Fairfax Land Proprietary. While these records are now part of the Virginia Land Office, they were for more than a century the archive of a vast private land office owned and oper- ated by the Fairfax family. The lands controlled by the family comprised an area bounded by the Rappahannock and Potomac Rivers and stretched from the Chesapeake Bay to what is now West Virginia. It embraced all or part of the cur- rent Virginia counties and cities of Alexandria, Arlington, Augusta, Clarke, Culpeper, Fairfax, Fauquier, Frederick, Greene, King George, Lancaster, Loudoun, Madison, Northumberland, Orange, Page, Prince William, Rappahannock, Shenandoah, Stafford, Warren, Westmoreland, and Winchester, and the current West Virginia counties of Berkeley, Hampshire, Hardy, Jefferson, and Morgan.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Department Chaplain Thirty-Seventh Annual
    Journal of the Thirty-seventh Annual Encampment OF THE Grand Army of the Republic Department of Kansas Held at Chanute, May 21, 22, 23 1918 ______ KANSAS STATE PRINTING PLANT W. R. SMITH, STATE PRINTER TOPEKA, 1918 7-3557 G. A. R. Department of Kansas REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT CHAPLAIN. A. C. Pierce, Department Commander: Dear Commander: I herewith submit my report for 1918. MEMORIAL SUNDAY SERVICES. Number of posts reporting. 201 Number of sermons preached. 178 Number of sermons preached by veterans. 124 Number of sermons preached by sons of veterans. 54 Number of comrades present Memorial Sunday. 2,937 MEMORIAL DAY DECORATION. Number of posts reporting. 201 Number of comrades present. 4,970 Number of cemeteries in which graves were decorated 632 Number of graves decorated. 21,890 Number of graves unmarked. 476 Number of public schools participating. 201 Number of pupils attending services. 12,213 Number of other organizations attending. 257 Number of addresses. 168 Number of addresses by veterans. 34 Number of addresses by sons of veterans. 47 Number of addresses by others. 87 Number of burial plots. 95 Number of posts reporting in 1917. 174 Number of posts reporting this year, 1918. 201 A gain of. 28 Number of deaths in 1917. 602 Number of deaths in 1918. 544 Decease in deaths in 1918. 58 Average deaths for the two years, about. 3 Comrades, in speaking of our comrades who have departed this life, we say of them that they are dead, which is true; but in another sense, I think we may truthfully say that they are not dead; for we have it upon record that our works follow us.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the College of William and Mary from Its Foundation, 1693
    1693 - 1870 m 1m mmtm m m m&NBm iKMi Sam On,•'.;:'.. m '' IIP -.•. m : . UBS . mm W3m BBSshsR iillltwlll ass I HHH1 m '. • ml §88 BmHRSSranH M£$ Sara ,mm. mam %£kff EARL GREGG SWEM LIBRARY THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA Presented By Dorothy Dickinson PIPPEN'S a BOOI^ a g OllD STORE, 5j S) 60S N. Eutaw St. a. BALT WORE. BOOES EOUOE' j ESCHANQED. 31 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/historyofcollege1870coll 0\JI.LCkj£ THE HISTORY College of William and Mary From its Foundation, 1693, to 1870. BALTIMOKE: Printed by John Murphy & Co. Publishers, Booksellers, Printers and Stationers, 182 Baltimore Street. 1870. Oath of Visitor, I. A. B., do golemnly promise and swear, that I will truly and faith- fully execute the duties of my office, as a vistor of William and Mary College, according to the best of my skill and judgment, without favour, affection or partiality. So help me God. Oath of President or Professor. I, do swear, that I will well and truly execute the duties of my office of according to the best of my ability. So help me God. THE CHARTER OF THE College of William and Mary, In Virginia. WILLIAM AND MARY, by the grace of God, of England, Scot- land, France and Ireland, King and Queen, defenders of the faith, &c. To all to whom these our present letters shall come, greeting. Forasmuch as our well-beloved and faithful subjects, constituting the General Assembly of our Colony of Virginia, have had it in their minds, and have proposed
    [Show full text]
  • The Functions of a Capital City: Williamsburg and Its "Public Times," 1699-1765
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1980 The functions of a capital city: Williamsburg and its "Public Times," 1699-1765 Mary S. Hoffschwelle College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hoffschwelle, Mary S., "The functions of a capital city: Williamsburg and its "Public Times," 1699-1765" (1980). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625107. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ja0j-0893 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FUNCTIONS OF A CAPITAL CITY: »» WILLIAMSBURG AND ITS "PUBLICK T I M E S 1699-1765 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Mary S„ Hoffschwelle 1980 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Mary S. Hoffschwelle Approved, August 1980 i / S A /] KdJL, C.£PC„ Kevin Kelly Q TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ........................... ................... iv CHAPTER I. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND ........................... 2 CHAPTER II. THE URBAN IMPULSE IN COLONIAL VIRGINIA AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION ........................... 14 CHAPTER III. THE CAPITAL ACQUIRES A LIFE OF ITS OWN: PUBLIC TIMES ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Twixt Ocean and Pines : the Seaside Resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 5-1996 Twixt ocean and pines : the seaside resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Souther, Jonathan Mark, "Twixt ocean and pines : the seaside resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930" (1996). Master's Theses. Paper 1037. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TWIXT OCEAN AND PINES: THE SEASIDE RESORT AT VIRGINIA BEACH, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther Master of Arts University of Richmond, 1996 Robert C. Kenzer, Thesis Director This thesis descnbes the first fifty years of the creation of Virginia Beach as a seaside resort. It demonstrates the importance of railroads in promoting the resort and suggests that Virginia Beach followed a similar developmental pattern to that of other ocean resorts, particularly those ofthe famous New Jersey shore. Virginia Beach, plagued by infrastructure deficiencies and overshadowed by nearby Ocean View, did not stabilize until its promoters shifted their attention from wealthy northerners to Tidewater area residents. After experiencing difficulties exacerbated by the Panic of 1893, the burning of its premier hotel in 1907, and the hesitation bred by the Spanish American War and World War I, Virginia Beach enjoyed robust growth during the 1920s. While Virginia Beach is often perceived as a post- World War II community, this thesis argues that its prewar foundation was critical to its subsequent rise to become the largest city in Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Virginia
    14 Facts & Photos Profiles of Virginia History of Virginia For thousands of years before the arrival of the English, vari- other native peoples to form the powerful confederacy that con- ous societies of indigenous peoples inhabited the portion of the trolled the area that is now West Virginia until the Shawnee New World later designated by the English as “Virginia.” Ar- Wars (1811-1813). By only 1646, very few Powhatans re- chaeological and historical research by anthropologist Helen C. mained and were policed harshly by the English, no longer Rountree and others has established 3,000 years of settlement even allowed to choose their own leaders. They were organized in much of the Tidewater. Even so, a historical marker dedi- into the Pamunkey and Mattaponi tribes. They eventually cated in 2015 states that recent archaeological work at dissolved altogether and merged into Colonial society. Pocahontas Island has revealed prehistoric habitation dating to about 6500 BCE. The Piscataway were pushed north on the Potomac River early in their history, coming to be cut off from the rest of their peo- Native Americans ple. While some stayed, others chose to migrate west. Their movements are generally unrecorded in the historical record, As of the 16th Century, what is now the state of Virginia was but they reappear at Fort Detroit in modern-day Michigan by occupied by three main culture groups: the Iroquoian, the East- the end of the 18th century. These Piscataways are said to have ern Siouan and the Algonquian. The tip of the Delmarva Penin- moved to Canada and probably merged with the Mississaugas, sula south of the Indian River was controlled by the who had broken away from the Anishinaabeg and migrated Algonquian Nanticoke.
    [Show full text]
  • Notre Dame Alumnus, Vol. 47, No. 04
    The Archives of The University of Notre Dame 607 Hesburgh Library Notre Dame, IN 46556 574-631-6448 [email protected] Notre Dame Archives: Alumnus Another Chapter ANOTHER issue of the Notre Dame everyone from the president of the V«L47 ALUMNUS brings still another University to his roommate to do chapter in the life of a growing uni­ something for or about Notre Dame. James D. Cooney versity. This time the news con­ And not once did he fail in his EXECUTIVE SECKETAKV cerns the move towards full co­ assignments. ALUMNI ASSOCIATION education between Notre Dame and A government major, the ol' John P. Thurin '59 ENTOK St. Mary's . the graduation of redhead was a member of the Univer­ Tom Sullivan '66 another Notre Dame class, the '69ers, sity's Student Life Council and MANACINC EDITOR itself a commentary on the tenor president of Farley Hall. Next for Meg Zweis of this institution ... the University's Mike is a two-year tour in Ceylon ASSISTANT EDITOR Bai Mitchell "71 view of ROTC on the Notre Dame with the Peace Corps. He then Mike McCa-jIcy '69 campus ... the $1 million gift by plans to earn a degree in public ad­ John MeDermott '70 Gulf and Western, a demonstration Jeanninc Doty ministration or law. Whatever his EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS of that corporation's "commitment course, Mike will do well. In our M. Bruce Harlan '49 to higher education" ... the estab­ book—and, admittedly we are CHIEF PHOTOGRAPHER lishment of "The Robert F. Ken­ ALUMNI ASSOaATION OFFICERS biased—he's number one.
    [Show full text]
  • English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records
    T iPlCTP \jrIRG by Lot L I B RAHY OF THL UN IVER.SITY Of ILLINOIS 975.5 D4-5"e ILL. HJST. survey Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/englishduplicateOOdesc English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records compiled by Louis des Cognets, Jr. © 1958, Louis des Cognets, Jr. P.O. Box 163 Princeton, New Jersey This book is dedicated to my grandmother ANNA RUSSELL des COGNETS in memory of the many years she spent writing two genealogies about her Virginia ancestors \ i FOREWORD This book was compiled from material found in the Public Record Office during the summer of 1957. Original reports sent to the Colonial Office from Virginia were first microfilmed, and then transcribed for publication. Some of the penmanship of the early part of the 18th Century was like copper plate, but some was very hard to decipher, and where the same name was often spelled in two different ways on the same page, the task was all the more difficult. May the various lists of pioneer Virginians contained herein aid both genealogists, students of colonial history, and those who make a study of the evolution of names. In this event a part of my debt to other abstracters and compilers will have been paid. Thanks are due the Staff at the Public Record Office for many heavy volumes carried to my desk, and for friendly assistance. Mrs. William Dabney Duke furnished valuable advice based upon her considerable experience in Virginia research. Mrs .Olive Sheridan being acquainted with old English names was especially suited to the secretarial duties she faithfully performed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancestry of Susannah Moore, My Great (X8
    The Ancestry of Susannah Moore, my Great (x8) Grandmother (born Susannah Drew in 1676 at Bishop's Cannings, Wiltshire) By Mark Wareham Last updated 20th January 2014 The information contained in these spreadsheets is gathered from several sources. I have tried to use recognised source material where it is available such as Visitation reports of the Harleian Society of the 16th and 17th centuries, wills, county histories or other reference books. There is some information from the internet such as Wikipedia Or some independent study and where that is the case I have tried to point that out as it is generally less reliable. For maternal ancestral branches refer to the worksheets arranged in alphabetical order according to family name. Family arms from those quartered with Mompesson in the 1623 Visitations of Wiltshire (left), middle from heraldry.ws, right from Burke's 'Geneological & Heraldic History .. Drew(e) family Susannah Drew m 14/4/1703 Erlestoke, Wilts John Moore b 16/1/1676 Bishop's Cannings, Wilts b 14/5/1677 West Lavington, Wilts d 9/11/1735 Seend d 13/4/1733 Seend I Henry Drew m c 1666 (3rd) Marie ? two prior marriages - see below b 5/9/1640 Bishop's Cannings b bf 1660 d 9/6/1715 Bishop's Cannings d 8/4/1705 Bishop's Cannings I John Drew m 1632 Avebury, Wiltshire Alice Turner b 15/3/1607 Bishop's Cannings b bf 1614 d 4/5/1682 Bishop's Cannings d 22/12/1680 Bishop's Cannings I Henry Drew m 11/10/1606 Bishop's Cannings Annes (Alice) Burden b bf 1588 not B Cannings or Devizes b bf 1585 d 6/6/1679 Bishops Cannings d aft 1618 not
    [Show full text]