Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Macclesfield in Cheshire
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR MACCLESFIELD IN CHESHIRE Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions March 1998 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for Macclesfield in Cheshire. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Helena Shovelton (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Professor Michael Clarke Robin Gray Bob Scruton David Thomas OBE Mike Bailey (Acting Chief Executive) ©Crown Copyright 1998 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 13 6 NEXT STEPS 27 APPENDICES A Final Recommendations for Macclesfield: Detailed Mapping 29 B Draft Recommendations for Macclesfield (November 1997) 39 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 31 March 1998 Dear Secretary of State On 3 June 1997 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of the borough of Macclesfield under the Local Government Act 1992. We published our draft recommendations for electoral arrangements in November 1997 and undertook a nine-week period of consultation. We have now prepared our final recommendations in the light of the consultation. We have substantially confirmed our draft recommendations, although some modifications have been made (see paragraph 84) in the light of further evidence. This report sets out our final recommendations for changes to electoral arrangements in Macclesfield. We recommend that Macclesfield Borough Council should be served by 60 councillors representing 38 wards, and that some changes should be made to ward boundaries in order to improve electoral equality, having regard to the statutory criteria. We recommend that elections should continue to take place by thirds. I would like to thank members and officers of the Borough Council and other local people who have contributed to the review. Their co-operation and assistance have been very much appreciated by Commissioners and staff. Yours sincerely PROFESSOR MALCOLM GRANT Chairman LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND v vi LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND SUMMARY The Commission began a review of Macclesfield ● In 37 of the 38 wards, the number of on 3 June 1997. We published our draft electors per councillor would vary by no recommendations for electoral arrangements on 4 more than 10 per cent from the borough November 1997, after which we undertook a nine- average. week period of consultation. ● By 2002, the number of electors per councillor is projected to vary by no more ● This report summarises the representations than 10 per cent from the average in 35 of we have received during consultation on our the 38 wards. draft recommendations, and offers our final recommendations to the Secretary of State. Recommendations are also made for changes to parish and town council electoral arrangements. We found that the existing electoral arrangements They provide for: provide unequal representation of electors in Macclesfield because: ● new warding arrangements for Bollington and Knutsford town councils and Poynton ● in 16 of the 34 wards, the number of Parish Council. electors represented by each councillor varies by more than 10 per cent from the average for the borough and six wards vary by more All further correspondence on these than 20 per cent from the average; recommendations and the matters discussed ● by 2002, electoral equality is expected to in this report should be addressed to the deteriorate further, with the number of Secretary of State for the Environment, electors per councillor forecast to vary by Transport and the Regions, who will more than 10 per cent from the average in not make an order implementing 19 wards, and by more than 20 per cent in the Commission’s recommendations before seven wards. 12 May 1998: Our main final recommendations for future The Secretary of State electoral arrangements (Figure 1 and paragraphs Department of the Environment, 83 to 84) are that: Transport and the Regions Local Government Review ● Macclesfield Borough Council should Eland House continue to be served by 60 councillors, as at Bressenden Place present; London SW1E 5DU ● there should be 38 wards, compared with 34 at present; ● the boundaries of 29 wards should be modified, while five wards should retain their existing boundaries; ● elections should continue to take place by thirds. These recommendations seek to ensure that the number of electors represented by each borough councillor is as nearly as possible the same, having regard to local circumstances. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND vii Figure 1: The Commission’s Final Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map reference councillors 1 Alderley Edge 2 Alderley Edge ward (Alderley Edge parish); Map 2 Nether Alderley ward (part – Chorley parish) 2 Bollington Central 1 Bollington Central borough and parish Map A3 ward (part); Bollington East borough and parish ward (part); Bollington West borough and parish ward (part) 3 Bollington East 1 Bollington East borough and parish ward Map A3 (part); Bollington Central borough and parish ward (part) 4 Bollington West 1 Bollington West borough and parish ward Map A3 (part) 5 Chelford 1 Nether Alderley ward (part – the parishes Map 2 of Nether Alderley, Great Warford, Chelford and Snelsdon) 6 Dean Row 2 Dean Row ward (part); Lacey Green Map A6 (in Wilmslow) ward (part) 7 Disley & 2 Disley ward and parish; Rainow ward Map 2 Lyme Handley (part – Lyme Handley parish) 8 Fulshaw 2 Fulshaw ward (part) Map A7 (in Wilmslow) 9 Gawsworth 1 Unchanged (the parishes of Gawsworth, Map 2 North Rode and Bosley) 10 Handforth 3 Handforth ward; Dean Row ward (part) Map A6 (in Wilmslow) 11 Henbury 1 Henbury ward (the parishes of Eaton, Map 2 Henbury, Marton, Siddington and Lower Withington); Nether Alderley ward (part – Over Alderley parish) 12 High Legh 1 High Legh ward (part – the parishes of Map 2 Aston by Budworth, High Legh and Pickmere) 13 Hough 2 Hough ward; Fulshaw ward (part); Map A7 (in Wilmslow) Lacey Green ward (part); Morley & Styal ward (part) 14 Knutsford Bexton 1 Knutsford West borough and parish Map A4 ward (part); Knutsford South borough and parish ward (part) viii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Figure 1 (continued): The Commission’s Final Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map reference councillors 15 Knutsford Nether 1 Knutsford Nether borough and parish Maps A4 and A5 ward (part); Knutsford West borough and parish ward (part) 16 Knutsford 1 Knutsford South borough and parish Map A5 Norbury Booths ward (part) 17 Knutsford Over 2 Knutsford Over borough and parish ward; Map A5 Knutsford South borough and parish ward (part); Knutsford Nether borough and parish ward (part) 18 Lacey Green 1 Lacey Green ward (part) Map A6 (in Wilmslow) 19 Macclesfield 2 Macclesfield North-West ward (part); Large map Bollinbrook Macclesfield North-East ward (part); Macclesfield Central ward (part) 20 Macclesfield 2 Macclesfield Central ward (part); Large map Central Macclesfield East ward (part); Macclesfield North-West ward (part) 21 Macclesfield 2 Macclesfield East ward (part); Large map East Macclesfield North-East ward (part) 22 Macclesfield 2 Macclesfield North-East ward (part); Large map Hurdsfield Macclesfield East ward (part) 23 Macclesfield Ivy 2 Macclesfield Central ward (part); Large map Macclesfield West ward (part) 24 Macclesfield Ryles 1 Macclesfield South ward (part) Large map 25 Macclesfield 2 Macclesfield South ward (part); Large map South Sutton ward (part – Lyme Green ward of Sutton parish) 26 Macclesfield 2 Macclesfield North-East ward (part) Large map Tytherington 27 Macclesfield 2 Macclesfield North-West ward (part) Large map Upton 28 Macclesfield 2 Macclesfield West ward (part) Large map West continued overleaf LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ix Figure 1 (continued): The Commission’s Final Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map reference councillors 29 Mere 1 Mere ward (the parishes of Agden, Map 2 Little Bollington, Ashley, Mere, Millington, Rostherne and Tatton); High Legh ward (part – the parishes of Tabley Inferior and Tabley Superior) 30 Mobberley 1 Unchanged (Mobberley parish) Map 2 31 Morley 2 Morley & Styal ward (part) Map A7 & Styal (in Wilmslow) 32 Plumley 1 Unchanged (the parishes of Plumley, Map 2 Bexton, Toft, Peover Inferior, Peover Superior, Little Warford and Marthall) 33 Poynton Central 3 Poynton Central ward (part) Map A2 34 Poynton East 1 Poynton East ward; Poynton Central Map A2 ward (part) 35 Poynton West 2 Unchanged (Poynton West ward) Map A2 36 Prestbury 2 Unchanged (the parishes of Prestbury, Map 2 Adlington and Mottram St Andrew) 37 Rainow 1 Rainow ward