DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution and Ecological Associations in Herbivorous Theropods Albert Chen 4/25/2016 Advisor: Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution and Ecological Associations in Herbivorous Theropods Albert Chen 4/25/2016 Advisor: Dr Evolution and Ecological Associations in Herbivorous Theropods Albert Chen 4/25/2016 Advisor: Dr. Thomas Holtz GEOL 394 1 Abstract Theropod dinosaurs are inferred to have been ancestrally carnivorous and include numerous lineages specialized for hypercarnivory. However, evidence from fossil gut contents, anatomical characteristics, and phylogenetic bracketing suggests that several theropod clades convergently transitioned away from a carnivorous lifestyle to become herbivores or omnivores. The evolutionary drivers of these trophic shifts are unknown. Methods involving the use of the Paleobiology Database (PBDB) were used to test for the potential impact of ecological factors that may have affected the diversification of non-hypercarnivorous theropods, such as the diversity of other herbivorous vertebrates, the diversity of plants, and change in global sea level. After demonstrating feasibility of the proposed methods by using restricted parameters (solely considering oviraptorosaurian theropods from the Cretaceous of Asia and contemporaneous herbivores), said methods were applied to an expanded dataset including more than 500 taxa from 51 geologic formations. No statistically significant correlations were found between non- hypercarnivorous theropod diversity and that of plants, but overall diversity of non- hypercarnivorous theropods was found to positively correlate through space and time with the diversity of other herbivores. These results suggest that non-hypercarnivorous theropods did not strongly compete with contemporaneous herbivores. Instead, their diversity may have been promoted by the presence of other herbivores or by extrinsic environmental factors that favored herbivorous species as a whole. Table of Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................2 Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................................2 Introduction and Background ......................................................................................................3 Method of Analysis ........................................................................................................................6 Presentation of Data and Analysis of Uncertainty ......................................................................8 Case study ...........................................................................................................................8 Expanded dataset of herbivorous taxa ...........................................................................18 Testing for correlation with plant diversity ...................................................................26 Testing for correlation with average global sea level ...................................................27 Discussion of uncertainty ................................................................................................27 Discussion......................................................................................................................................28 Suggestions for Future Work ......................................................................................................29 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................30 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................30 Bibliography .................................................................................................................................30 Appendix A: Taxon Occurrence Data Used in Case Study .....................................................35 Appendix B: Additional Herbivore Occurrence Data Used in Expanded Dataset ................46 Appendix C: Plant Occurrence Data .........................................................................................71 2 Appendix D: Average Global Sea Level of Examined Geologic Stages ..................................75 University of Maryland Honor Pledge .......................................................................................76 Figure 1: Schematic of theropod skull morphology....................................................................4 Figure 2: Phylogenetic tree of theropods .....................................................................................5 Table 1: Genus counts of oviraptorosaurs and potential competitors ......................................9 Figure 3: Oviraptorosaur diversity plotted against diversity of potential competitors ........11 Figure 4: Oviraptorosaur diversity plotted against diversity of other non-hypercarnivorous theropods ..........................................................................................................................12 Figure 5: Measures of diversity plotted against geologic stages ..............................................13 Table 2: Calculated correlation coefficients for case study .....................................................14 Figure 6: Residual diversity of oviraptorosaurs over time ......................................................15 Figure 7: Residual diversity of other non-hypercarnivorous theropods over time ...............16 Figure 8: Residual diversity of all potential competitors over time ........................................17 Table 3: Calculated correlation coefficients after correction of biases ...................................18 Figure 9: Expanded dataset of diversity plotted over time ......................................................19 Figure 10: Residual diversity of all non-hypercarnivorous theropods over time (by DBCs) ............................................................................................................................................20 Figure 11: Residual diversity of all non-hypercarnivorous theropods over time (by DBFs) 20 Figure 12: Residual diversity of all potential competitors over time (by DBCs) ...................21 Figure 13: Residual diversity of all potential competitors over time (by DBFs) ....................21 Table 4: Calculated correlation coefficients using expanded herbivore dataset....................22 Table 5: Calculated correlation coefficients relating theropod and plant diversity ..............27 Table 6: Calculated correlation coefficients relating theropod diversity and average global sea level .............................................................................................................................27 Introduction and Background Theropods are a diverse group of dinosaurs, comprising numerous disparate species both extant (in the form of birds) and extinct. Theropods are ancestrally carnivorous and encompass all dinosaurs known to be specialized for carnivory (Hendrickx et al., 2015). However, some Mesozoic theropods preserve fossil evidence of departure from a hypercarnivorous lifestyle, including plant material found as gut contents (Zhou and Zhang, 2002; Zheng et al., 2011; Ji et al., 2012) and gastroliths suggestive of a gastric mill similar to modern herbivorous birds (Ji et al., 1998; Kobayashi et al., 1999; Ji et al., 2003; Zhou and Zhang, 2006; Xu et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2016). In 2011, Zanno and Makovicky identified 21 morphological characters strongly correlated with herbivory in Mesozoic theropods: a downturned dentary symphyseal region (1); a rostrally projecting dentary symphysis (2); a ventrally concave cranioventral margin of the dentary (3); rostral (4), caudal (5), or total (6) tooth loss in the 3 dentary; conical dentary (7) or premaxillary (8) teeth, particularly the rostralmost dentition (9); symmetrical teeth (10); loss of ziphodonty (blade-shaped teeth) (11); elongate (12), procumbent (13), or unserrated (14) premaxillary teeth; tooth loss in the premaxilla (15); lack of pronounced replacement waves of teeth (16); lanceolate (lance-shaped) cheek teeth (17); heterodont dentition (teeth varied in shape) (18); densely-packed dentition (19); a ventrally displaced mandibular joint (20); and the presence of more than 10 cervical (neck) vertebrae (21) (see Fig. 1 for a pictorial orientation of anatomical terms). Figure 1. Schematic of the skull of the therizinosaur Erlikosaurus, in left lateral view of the upper jaw (A), left lateral view of the lower jaw (B), and dorsal view of the lower jaw (C), with anatomical terms used in this paper labeled. Based on a digital reconstruction of specimen IGM 100/111, provided in Lautenschlager et al., 2014. 4 By documenting the distribution of these characters among theropods, Zanno and Makovicky inferred herbivory as the predominant diet in the ceratosaur Limusaurus and many clades within Maniraptoriformes (Ornithomimosauria, Therizinosauria, Alvarezsauria, Oviraptorosauria, Scansoriopterygidae, Avialae, and the troodontid Jinfengopteryx) (Zanno and Makovicky, 2011). Subsequently, the theropod Chilesaurus was described by Novas et al. in 2015 as a basal tetanuran that had adapted to a non-hypercarnivorous diet independently of the aforementioned groups (Fig. 2). Additionally, though modern birds have diversified to become specialized for a vast variety of feeding habits, herbivory has evolved several times in their history (Olsen, 2015). Because carnivory is the likely ancestral condition for theropods, herbivorous theropods almost certainly went through a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Phylogenetic Position of Ambiortus: Comparison with Other Mesozoic Birds from Asia1 J
    ISSN 00310301, Paleontological Journal, 2013, Vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 1270–1281. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2013. The Phylogenetic Position of Ambiortus: Comparison with Other Mesozoic Birds from Asia1 J. K. O’Connora and N. V. Zelenkovb aKey Laboratory of Evolution and Systematics, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, 142 Xizhimenwai Dajie, Beijing China 10044 bBorissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow, 117997 Russia email: [email protected], [email protected] Received August 6, 2012 Abstract—Since the last description of the ornithurine bird Ambiortus dementjevi from Mongolia, a wealth of Early Cretaceous birds have been discovered in China. Here we provide a detailed comparison of the anatomy of Ambiortus relative to other known Early Cretaceous ornithuromorphs from the Chinese Jehol Group and Xiagou Formation. We include new information on Ambiortus from a previously undescribed slab preserving part of the sternum. Ambiortus is superficially similar to Gansus yumenensis from the Aptian Xiagou Forma tion but shares more morphological features with Yixianornis grabaui (Ornithuromorpha: Songlingorni thidae) from the Jiufotang Formation of the Jehol Group. In general, the mosaic pattern of character distri bution among early ornithuromorph taxa does not reveal obvious relationships between taxa. Ambiortus was placed in a large phylogenetic analysis of Mesozoic birds, which confirms morphological observations and places Ambiortus in a polytomy with Yixianornis and Gansus. Keywords: Ornithuromorpha, Ambiortus, osteology, phylogeny, Early Cretaceous, Mongolia DOI: 10.1134/S0031030113110063 1 INTRODUCTION and articulated partial skeleton, preserving several cervi cal and thoracic vertebrae, and parts of the left thoracic Ambiortus dementjevi Kurochkin, 1982 was one of girdle and wing (specimen PIN, nos.
    [Show full text]
  • A Neoceratopsian Dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Mongolia And
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01222-7 OPEN A neoceratopsian dinosaur from the early Cretaceous of Mongolia and the early evolution of ceratopsia ✉ Congyu Yu 1 , Albert Prieto-Marquez2, Tsogtbaatar Chinzorig 3,4, Zorigt Badamkhatan4,5 & Mark Norell1 1234567890():,; Ceratopsia is a diverse dinosaur clade from the Middle Jurassic to Late Cretaceous with early diversification in East Asia. However, the phylogeny of basal ceratopsians remains unclear. Here we report a new basal neoceratopsian dinosaur Beg tse based on a partial skull from Baruunbayan, Ömnögovi aimag, Mongolia. Beg is diagnosed by a unique combination of primitive and derived characters including a primitively deep premaxilla with four pre- maxillary teeth, a trapezoidal antorbital fossa with a poorly delineated anterior margin, very short dentary with an expanded and shallow groove on lateral surface, the derived presence of a robust jugal having a foramen on its anteromedial surface, and five equally spaced tubercles on the lateral ridge of the surangular. This is to our knowledge the earliest known occurrence of basal neoceratopsian in Mongolia, where this group was previously only known from Late Cretaceous strata. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that it is sister to all other neoceratopsian dinosaurs. 1 Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York 10024, USA. 2 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, ICTA-ICP, Edifici Z, c/de les Columnes s/n Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain. 3 Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. 4 Institute of Paleontology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, ✉ Ulaanbaatar 15160, Mongolia.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia
    AMEGHINIANA (Rev. Asoc. Paleontol. Argent.) - 40 (1): 119-122. Buenos Aires, 30-03-2003 ISSN0002-7014 NOTA PALEONTOLÓGICA A new specimen of Patagonykus puertai (Theropoda: Alvarezsauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia Luis M. CHIAPPE1and Rodolfo A. CORIA2 Introduction Systematic paleontology With their short and robust forelimbs, highly ki- THEROPODA netic skulls, and a host of unique skeletal features, COELUROSAURIA alvarezsaurids are highly specialized Mesozoic ALVAREZSAURIDAEBonaparte, 1991 coelurosaurian theropods known from the Late Cretaceous of Asia, North, and South America Genus PatagonykusNovas, 1997a (Chiappe et al., 2002). Despite abundant and well- preserved material from the Gobi Desert of Patagonykussp. cf. P. puertaiNovas, 1997a Mongolia, the phylogenetic relationships of al- Figures 1 and 2 varezsaurids have remained unclear (Chiappe et Material. MCF-PVPH-102 (Museo Carmen Funes, al., 2002; Novas and Pol, 2002; Suzuki et al., 2002). Paleontología de Vertebrados; Plaza Huincul, The most basal alvarezsaurids are from South Neuquén, Argentina), an articulated phalanx 1 and 2 America and are limited to just two taxa from the (ungual) of the left manual digit I. Patagonian province of Neuquén (Argentina), Geographical provenance and geological horizon. Alvarezsaurus calvoi (Bonaparte, 1991) and Northern shore of Los Barriales lake, approximately Patagokykus puertai (Novas, 1997a), which although 80 km north Plaza Huincul. Because the specimen poorly represented are important because they was not collected by professionals, no precise strati- have been consistently interpreted as the most ple- graphic information is available; nonetheless, only siomorphic members of the group (Novas, 1996; the Late Cretaceous Neuquén Group outcrops in this Chiappe et al., 1998). area. Also, considering that the holotype specimen of Here we report on a second specimen of Patagonykus puertaiwas found in beds attributed to Patagonykus, which we assign to the species P.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTER Doi:10.1038/Nature14423
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature14423 A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran theropod with preserved evidence of membranous wings Xing Xu1,2*, Xiaoting Zheng1,3*, Corwin Sullivan2, Xiaoli Wang1, Lida Xing4, Yan Wang1, Xiaomei Zhang3, Jingmai K. O’Connor2, Fucheng Zhang2 & Yanhong Pan5 The wings of birds and their closest theropod relatives share a ratios are 1.16 and 1.08, respectively, compared to 0.96 and 0.78 in uniform fundamental architecture, with pinnate flight feathers Epidendrosaurus and 0.79 and 0.66 in Epidexipteryx), an extremely as the key component1–3. Here we report a new scansoriopterygid short humeral deltopectoral crest, and a long rod-like bone articu- theropod, Yi qi gen. et sp. nov., based on a new specimen from the lating with the wrist. Middle–Upper Jurassic period Tiaojishan Formation of Hebei Key osteological features are as follows. STM 31-2 (Fig. 1) is inferred Province, China4. Yi is nested phylogenetically among winged ther- to be an adult on the basis of the closed neurocentral sutures of the opods but has large stiff filamentous feathers of an unusual type on visible vertebrae, although this is not a universal criterion for maturity both the forelimb and hindlimb. However, the filamentous feath- across archosaurian taxa12. Its body mass is estimated to be approxi- ers of Yi resemble pinnate feathers in bearing morphologically mately 380 g, using an empirical equation13. diverse melanosomes5. Most surprisingly, Yi has a long rod-like The skull and mandible are similar to those of other scansoriopter- bone extending from each wrist, and patches of membranous tissue ygids, and to a lesser degree to those of oviraptorosaurs and some basal preserved between the rod-like bones and the manual digits.
    [Show full text]
  • Mini Page 1.28.15.Indd
    © 2015 Universal Uclick Roaming North America from The Mini Page © 2015 Universal Uclick Land of Dinosaurs Gigantic dinosaurs such as It wasn’t snowing then Tyrannosaurus rex (ty-RAN- Right now, in the middle of the oh-SORE-rus RECKS) and winter, if you look at the states where Triceratops (tri-SER-uh-tops) the Hell Creek Formation is, it is hard ruled western North America 66 to imagine that in the time of the million years ago. dinosaurs it was a rainy, subtropical Dinosaurs had been roaming forest. There were no cold winters. It the Earth for about 165 million would have been much like southern years. And then, in just a few Florida today. years, all dinosaurs but birds The Earth was much warmer 66 were wiped from the planet. million to 68 million years ago, at the Much of what we know end of the Cretaceous (kruh-TAY-shus) about these awesome animals Period. There were no polar ice caps. and the land they ruled comes The planet’s sea levels were much from fossil discoveries in one higher than today. The oceans had set of rocks, the Hell Creek flooded parts of North America, Formation. This layer of rocks creating a huge inland sea. Dinosaurs covers parts of Montana, North lived to the east and west of the sea. Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming. (It is called the Lance At the top of the Formation in Wyoming.) art, Anzu In November 2014, the (the pink art by Mary Parrish, courtesy Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian’s National dinosaurs) Museum of Natural History in In the background, an Edmontosaurus (ed-MON- roam toh-SAW-rus) travels through a swamp in the through Washington, D.C., opened a new Hell Creek Formation area 66 million years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, Second Edition
    MASS ESTIMATES - DINOSAURS ETC (largely based on models) taxon k model femur length* model volume ml x specific gravity = model mass g specimen (modeled 1st):kilograms:femur(or other long bone length)usually in decameters kg = femur(or other long bone)length(usually in decameters)3 x k k = model volume in ml x specific gravity(usually for whole model) then divided/model femur(or other long bone)length3 (in most models femur in decameters is 0.5253 = 0.145) In sauropods the neck is assigned a distinct specific gravity; in dinosaurs with large feathers their mass is added separately; in dinosaurs with flight ablity the mass of the fight muscles is calculated separately as a range of possiblities SAUROPODS k femur trunk neck tail total neck x 0.6 rest x0.9 & legs & head super titanosaur femur:~55000-60000:~25:00 Argentinosaurus ~4 PVPH-1:~55000:~24.00 Futalognkosaurus ~3.5-4 MUCPv-323:~25000:19.80 (note:downsize correction since 2nd edition) Dreadnoughtus ~3.8 “ ~520 ~75 50 ~645 0.45+.513=.558 MPM-PV 1156:~26000:19.10 Giraffatitan 3.45 .525 480 75 25 580 .045+.455=.500 HMN MB.R.2181:31500(neck 2800):~20.90 “XV2”:~45000:~23.50 Brachiosaurus ~4.15 " ~590 ~75 ~25 ~700 " +.554=~.600 FMNH P25107:~35000:20.30 Europasaurus ~3.2 “ ~465 ~39 ~23 ~527 .023+.440=~.463 composite:~760:~6.20 Camarasaurus 4.0 " 542 51 55 648 .041+.537=.578 CMNH 11393:14200(neck 1000):15.25 AMNH 5761:~23000:18.00 juv 3.5 " 486 40 55 581 .024+.487=.511 CMNH 11338:640:5.67 Chuanjiesaurus ~4.1 “ ~550 ~105 ~38 ~693 .063+.530=.593 Lfch 1001:~10700:13.75 2 M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basal Lithostrotian Titanosaur (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) with a Complete Skull: Implications for the Evolution and Paleobiology of Titanosauria
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A Basal Lithostrotian Titanosaur (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) with a Complete Skull: Implications for the Evolution and Paleobiology of Titanosauria Rubén D. F. Martínez1*, Matthew C. Lamanna2, Fernando E. Novas3, Ryan C. Ridgely4, Gabriel A. Casal1, Javier E. Martínez5, Javier R. Vita6, Lawrence M. Witmer4 1 Laboratorio de Paleovertebrados, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Comodoro Rivadavia, Chubut, Argentina, 2 Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America, 3 Laboratorio de Anatomía Comparada y Evolución de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America, 5 Hospital Regional de Comodoro Rivadavia, Comodoro Rivadavia, Chubut, Argentina, 6 Resonancia Magnética Borelli, Comodoro Rivadavia, Chubut, Argentina * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Martínez RDF, Lamanna MC, Novas FE, Ridgely RC, Casal GA, Martínez JE, et al. (2016) A Basal Lithostrotian Titanosaur (Dinosauria: Abstract Sauropoda) with a Complete Skull: Implications for the Evolution and Paleobiology of Titanosauria. PLoS We describe Sarmientosaurus musacchioi gen. et sp. nov., a titanosaurian sauropod dino- ONE 11(4): e0151661. doi:10.1371/journal. saur from the Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian—Turonian) Lower Member of the Bajo Bar- pone.0151661 real Formation of southern Chubut Province in
    [Show full text]
  • A New Caenagnathid Dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A new caenagnathid dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi Group of Shandong, China, with Received: 12 October 2017 Accepted: 7 March 2018 comments on size variation among Published: xx xx xxxx oviraptorosaurs Yilun Yu1, Kebai Wang2, Shuqing Chen2, Corwin Sullivan3,4, Shuo Wang 5,6, Peiye Wang2 & Xing Xu7 The bone-beds of the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi Group in Zhucheng, Shandong, China are rich in fossil remains of the gigantic hadrosaurid Shantungosaurus. Here we report a new oviraptorosaur, Anomalipes zhaoi gen. et sp. nov., based on a recently collected specimen comprising a partial left hindlimb from the Kugou Locality in Zhucheng. This specimen’s systematic position was assessed by three numerical cladistic analyses based on recently published theropod phylogenetic datasets, with the inclusion of several new characters. Anomalipes zhaoi difers from other known caenagnathids in having a unique combination of features: femoral head anteroposteriorly narrow and with signifcant posterior orientation; accessory trochanter low and confuent with lesser trochanter; lateral ridge present on femoral lateral surface; weak fourth trochanter present; metatarsal III with triangular proximal articular surface, prominent anterior fange near proximal end, highly asymmetrical hemicondyles, and longitudinal groove on distal articular surface; and ungual of pedal digit II with lateral collateral groove deeper and more dorsally located than medial groove. The holotype of Anomalipes zhaoi is smaller than is typical for Caenagnathidae but larger than is typical for the other major oviraptorosaurian subclade, Oviraptoridae. Size comparisons among oviraptorisaurians show that the Caenagnathidae vary much more widely in size than the Oviraptoridae. Oviraptorosauria is a clade of maniraptoran theropod dinosaurs characterized by a short, high skull, long neck and short tail.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dinosaur Called Tiny Free
    FREE A DINOSAUR CALLED TINY PDF Alan Durant,Jo Simpson | 32 pages | 06 Aug 2007 | HarperCollins Publishers | 9780007233908 | English | London, United Kingdom A Dinosaur Called Tiny by Alan Durant Members of its single species Compsognathus longipes could grow to around the size of a turkey. Paleontologists have found two well-preserved fossilsone in Germany in the s and the second in France more than a century later. Today, C. Many presentations still describe Compsognathus as "chicken-sized" dinosaurs because of the size of the German specimen, which is now believed to be a juvenile. Compsognathus longipes is one of the few dinosaur species whose diet is known with certainty: the remains of small, agile lizards are preserved in the bellies of both specimens. Teeth discovered in Portugal may be further fossil remains of the genus. Although not recognized as such at the time of its discovery, Compsognathus is the first theropod dinosaur known from a reasonably complete fossil skeleton. Until the s, it was the smallest-known non- avialan dinosaur, with the preceding centuries incorrectly labelling them as the closest relative of Archaeopteryx. However, dinosaurs discovered later, such as CaenagnathasiaMicroraptor and Parvicursorwere even smaller. The largest Compsognathus specimen is estimated to have weighed somewhere between A Dinosaur Called Tiny. Compsognathus were small, bipedal animals with long hind legs and longer tails, which they used for balance during locomotion. The forelimbs were smaller than the hindlimbs. The hand bore two large, clawed digits and a third, smaller A Dinosaur Called Tiny that may have been non-functional. The skull had five pairs of fenestrae skull openingsthe largest of which was for the orbit eye socket[7] with the eyes being larger in proportion to the rest of the skull.
    [Show full text]
  • Difficulties with the Origin of Dinosaurs: a Short Comment on the Current Debate
    REVIEW ARTICLE Difficulties with the origin of dinosaurs: a short comment on the current debate MATTHEW G. BARON BPP University, 144 Uxbridge Road, London W12 8AA, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The origin and early evolutionary history of the dinosaurs is a topic that has recently gone through a period of renewed interest and academic debate. For 130 years, one way of classifying the various dinosaur subgroups persisted as the accepted model, with increasing levels of research in the past quarter-century also providing evidence for the hypothesis that dinosaur origination occurred in the Southern Hemisphere, particularly in South America. It is, after all, from within the Late Triassic strata of countries like Argentina and Brazil that we get some of the very best early dinosaur specimens; many of these specimens are the earliest known representatives of some of the major dinosaur subgroups, such as the theropods and sauropodomorphs. However, some recent analyses have brought about a shift in terms of what is currently accepted and what is now disputed regarding the origin of dinosaurs – the Southern Hemisphere origination hypothesis was questioned (although this was based upon observations and not with quantitative analysis techniques), as has the shape of the dinosaur tree. Responses to the new hypothesis were numerous and robust, and new analyses further supported a Southern Hemisphere point of origin. Whilst the interrelationships between the major dinosaur clades remains to be fully resolved, the current data does seem to comprehensively answer the question of where the dinosaurs first originated. However, it is arguable whether or not the current data that is being used in such palaeobiogeographical analyses is sufficient to provide a meaningful answer to the question of where specifically the dinosaur clade first appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 JOURNAL of VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY a New
    JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY A new caenagnathid (Dinosauria: Oviraptorosauria) from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation of Alberta, Canada, and a reevaluation of the relationships of Caenagnathidae GREGORY F. FUNSTON*,,PHILIP J. CURRIE Department of Biological Sciences, CW 405, Biological Sciences Building, University of Alberta,Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9 [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 1 1 CHARACTERS MODIFIED FROM LAMANNA ET AL. (2014) 78. Dentary: (0) elongate; (1) proportionally short and deep, with maximum depth of dentary between 25% and 50% of dentary length (with length measured from the tip of the jaw to the end of the posterodorsal process); (2) extremely short and deep, with maximum depth 50% or more of dentary length. [ORDERED] Modification—Removed [ORDERED] Justification—Mandibular variation through ontogeny in has not been qualified in oviraptorosaurs, nor has the degree of intraspecific variation. This character in particular is correlated with size in caenagnathids, such that larger specimens tend show state 0, and smaller specimens tend to show state 2, with a smooth gradient between. 84. Anterodorsal margin of dentary in lateral view: (0) straight; (1) concave; (2) broadly concave. [ORDERED] Modification—Removed [ORDERED] Justification—As above, though the opposite correlation to size is shown: large specimens tend to show state 2, and small specimens tend to show state 0. 176. Manual phalanx II-2: (0) longer than II-1; (1) subequal to or slightly shorter than II- 1; (2) distinctly shorter than II-1. [ORDERED] Modification—Removed [ORDERED] Justification—Caenagnathid manual proportions are highly variable, with a number of apparent reversals within clades. For example, Hagryphus giganteus, scored as character state 1 for this character, is consistently recovered as a basal caenagnathid, but within more derived caenagnathids, all three character states for this character are present, indicating that the character state can move both directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Specimen of Microraptor Provides Unique Evidence of Dinosaurs Preying on Birds
    Additional specimen of Microraptor provides unique evidence of dinosaurs preying on birds Jingmai O’Connor1, Zhonghe Zhou1, and Xing Xu Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China Contributed by Zhonghe Zhou, October 28, 2011 (sent for review September 13, 2011) Preserved indicators of diet are extremely rare in the fossil record; The vertebral column of this specimen is complete except for even more so is unequivocal direct evidence for predator–prey its proximal and distal ends; pleurocoels are absent from the relationships. Here, we report on a unique specimen of the small thoracic vertebrae, as in dromaeosaurids and basal birds. Poor nonavian theropod Microraptor gui from the Early Cretaceous preservation prevents clear observation of sutures; however, Jehol biota, China, which has the remains of an adult enantiorni- there does not appear to be any separation between the neural thine bird preserved in its abdomen, most likely not scavenged, arches and vertebral centra, or any other indicators that the but captured and consumed by the dinosaur. We provide direct specimen is a juvenile. The number of caudal vertebrae cannot evidence for the dietary preferences of Microraptor and a nonavian be estimated, but the elongate distal caudals are tightly bounded dinosaur feeding on a bird. Further, because Jehol enantiorni- by elongated zygapophyses, as in other dromaeosaurids. The rib thines were distinctly arboreal, in contrast to their cursorial orni- cage is nearly completely preserved; both right and left sides are thurine counterparts, this fossil suggests that Microraptor hunted visible ventrally closed by the articulated gastral basket.
    [Show full text]