Epidemiology of Anguina Agrostis on Highland Colonial Bentgrass
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1PM in Oregon
(-ia Does not circulate Special Report 1020 October 2000 k 1PMin Oregon: Achievements and Future Directions N EMATOLOGY 4 ENTOMOLOGY 'V SOCIAL SCIEESI Integrated plant protection center OREGONSTATE UNIVERSITY I EXTENSION SERVICE For additional copies of this publication, send $15.00per copy to: Integrated Plant Protection Center 2040 Cordley Hall Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 9733 1-3904 Oregon State University Extension Service SpecialReport 1020 October 2000 1PMin Oregon: Achievements and Future Directions Editors: Myron Shenk Integrated Pest Management Specialist and Marcos Kogan Director, Integrated Plant Protection Center Oregon State University Table of Contents Welcome I Introductions 1 Marcos Kogan, OSU, Director IPPC Words from the President of Oregon State University 3 Paul Risser, President of OSU OSU Extension Service's Commitment to 1PM 5 Lyla Houglum, OSU, Director OSU-ES 1PM on the National Scene 8 Harold Coble, N. Carolina State U.! NatI. 1PM Program Coordinator The Role of Extension in Promoting 1PM Programs 13 Michael Gray, University of Illinois, 1PM Coordinator Performance Criteria for Measuring 1PM Results 19 Charles Benbrook, Benbrook Consulting Services FQPA Effects on Integrated Pest Management in the United States 28 Mark Whalon, Michigan State University and Resistance Management 1PM: Grower Friendly Practices and Cherry Grower Challenges 34 Bob Bailey, Grower, The Dalles Areawide Management of Codling Moth in Pears 36 Philip Vanbuskirk, Richard Hilton, Laura Naumes, and Peter Westigard, OSU Extension Service, Jackson County; Naumes Orchards, Medford Integrated Fruit Production for Pome Fruit in Hood River: Pest Management in the Integrated Fruit Production (IFP) Program 43 Helmut Riedl, Franz Niederholzer, and Clark Seavert, OSU Mid-Columbia Research and Ext. -
Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer
MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES THAT DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee 1995 Assessment UNEP 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee 1995 Assessment Montreal Protocol On Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer UNEP 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee 1995 Assessment The text of this report is composed in Times Roman. Co-ordination: Jonathan Banks (Chair MBTOC) Composition and layout: Michelle Horan Reprinting: UNEP Nairobi, Ozone Secretariat Date: 30 November 1994 No copyright involved. Printed in Kenya; 1994. ISBN 92-807-1448-1 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee for the 1995 Assessment of the MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES THAT DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER pursuant to Article 6 of the Montreal Protocol; Decision IV/13 (1993) by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol Disclaimer The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Technology and Economics Assessment Panel co-chairs and members, the Technical and Economics Options Committees chairs and members and the companies and organisations that employ them do not endorse the performance, worker safety, or environmental acceptability of any of the technical options discussed. Every industrial operation requires consideration of worker safety and proper disposal of contaminants and waste products. Moreover, as work continues - including additional toxicity testing and evaluation - more information on health, environmental and safety effects of alternatives and replacements -
Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions ..................................................................................................................................................... -
Theory Manual Course No. Pl. Path
NAVSARI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY Theory Manual INTRODUCTORY PLANT NEMATOLOGY Course No. Pl. Path 2.2 (V Dean’s) nd 2 Semester B.Sc. (Hons.) Agri. PROF.R.R.PATEL, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR Dr.D.M.PATHAK, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR Dr.R.R.WAGHUNDE, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANT PATHOLOGY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE NAVSARI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY BHARUCH 392012 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION What are the nematodes? Nematodes are belongs to animal kingdom, they are triploblastic, unsegmented, bilateral symmetrical, pseudocoelomateandhaving well developed reproductive, nervous, excretoryand digestive system where as the circulatory and respiratory systems are absent but govern by the pseudocoelomic fluid. Plant Nematology: Nematology is a science deals with the study of morphology, taxonomy, classification, biology, symptomatology and management of {plant pathogenic} nematode (PPN). The word nematode is made up of two Greek words, Nema means thread like and eidos means form. The words Nematodes is derived from Greek words ‘Nema+oides’ meaning „Thread + form‟(thread like organism ) therefore, they also called threadworms. They are also known as roundworms because nematode body tubular is shape. The movement (serpentine) of nematodes like eel (marine fish), so also called them eelworm in U.K. and Nema in U.S.A. Roundworms by Zoologist Nematodes are a diverse group of organisms, which are found in many different environments. Approximately 50% of known nematode species are marine, 25% are free-living species found in soil or freshwater, 15% are parasites of animals, and 10% of known nematode species are parasites of plants (see figure at left). The study of nematodes has traditionally been viewed as three separate disciplines: (1) Helminthology dealing with the study of nematodes and other worms parasitic in vertebrates (mainly those of importance to human and veterinary medicine). -
Biology and Control of the Anguinid Nematode
BIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF THE AIIGTIINID NEMATODE ASSOCIATED WITH F'LOOD PLAIN STAGGERS by TERRY B.ERTOZZI (B.Sc. (Hons Zool.), University of Adelaide) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The University of Adelaide (School of Agriculture and Wine) September 2003 Table of Contents Title Table of contents.... Summary Statement..... Acknowledgments Chapter 1 Introduction ... Chapter 2 Review of Literature 2.I Introduction.. 4 2.2 The 8acterium................ 4 2.2.I Taxonomic status..' 4 2.2.2 The toxins and toxin production.... 6 2.2.3 Symptoms of poisoning................. 7 2.2.4 Association with nematodes .......... 9 2.3 Nematodes of the genus Anguina 10 2.3.1 Taxonomy and sYstematics 10 2.3.2 Life cycle 13 2.4 Management 15 2.4.1 Identifi cation...................'..... 16 2.4.2 Agronomicmethods t6 2.4.3 FungalAntagonists l7 2.4.4 Other strategies 19 2.5 Conclusions 20 Chapter 3 General Methods 3.1 Field sites... 22 3.2 Collection and storage of Polypogon monspeliensis and Agrostis avenaceø seed 23 3.3 Surface sterilisation and germination of seed 23 3.4 Collection and storage of nematode galls .'.'.'.....'.....' 24 3.5 Ext¡action ofjuvenile nematodes from galls 24 3.6 Counting nematodes 24 3.7 Pot experiments............. 24 Chapter 4 Distribution of Flood Plain Staggers 4.1 lntroduction 26 4.2 Materials and Methods..............'.. 27 4.2.1 Survey of Murray River flood plains......... 27 4.2.2 Survey of southeastern South Australia .... 28 4.2.3 Surveys of northern New South Wales...... 28 4.3 Results 29 4.3.1 Survey of Murray River flood plains... -
Updated March 2015 (Replaces February 2010 Version)
Recovery Plan for Rathayibacter Poisoning caused by Rathayibacter toxicus (syn. Clavibacter toxicus) Updated March 2015 (Replaces February 2010 Version) Contents Page Executive Summary 2 Contributors and Reviewers 5 I. Introduction 5 II. Disease Development and Symptoms 8 III. Plant Infection, Spread of the Bacterium, and Animal Poisoning 11 IV. Monitoring and Detection 12 V. Response 13 VI. USDA Pathogen Permits 14 VII. Economic Impact and Compensation 15 VIII. Mitigation and Disease Management 15 IX. Infrastructure and Experts 16 X. Research, Extension, and Education Needs 17 References 20 Web Resources 25 Appendices 26 This recovery plan is one of several disease-specific documents produced as part of the National Plant Disease Recovery System (NPDRS) called for in Homeland Security Presidential Directive Number 9 (HSPD-9). The purpose of the NPDRS is to ensure that the tools, infrastructure, communication networks, and capacity required to minimize the impact of high consequence plant disease outbreaks are available so that an adequate level of crop production is maintained. Each disease-specific plan is intended to provide a brief primer on the disease, assess the status of critical recovery components, and identify disease management research, extension, and education needs. These documents are not intended to be stand-alone documents that address all of the many and varied aspects of plant disease outbreaks and all of the decisions that must be made and actions taken to achieve effective response and recovery. They are, however, documents that will help the USDA to further guide efforts toward plant disease recovery. Cite this document as: Murray, T.D., I. Agarkova, S. -
Bacterial Associates of Anguina Species Isolated from Galls Yang Chang WEN and David R
Fundam. appi. NemaLOi., 1992, 15 (3), 231-234. Bacterial associates of Anguina species isolated from galls Yang Chang WEN and David R. VIGLIERCHIO Department of Nematology, University of Califomia, Davis, CA 95616, USA Accepted for publication 9 April 1991. Summary - Certain animal and plant diseases are weil known to be a consequence of a particular nematode and bacterial species involved in an intimate relationship. For several such insect diseases, reports indicate that the nematode is unable to survive in the absence of the specific partner. That is not the case for the plant parasite group, Anguina in which each partner may survive independently. This report suggests that the relationship with Anguina is opportunistic in that if the appropriate bacteria share the nematode community, the characteristic disease appears. In the absence of that particular bacterial species other bacterial species in the nematode niche can substitute; however the relationship is benign. This indicates that although specificity in partners is required for a specific disease to emerge the nematode may develop intimate relationships with a range of non-threatening bacteria. Therein may lie part of the explanation of why the" sheep staggers " disease so serious to livestock in Australia is not so in the US Pacific Northwest which harbors the same nematode, Anguina agrostis. Résumé - Bactéries associées à certaines espèces d1\nguina isolées de galles - Certaines maladies des animaux et des plantes sont bien connues pour être causées par des espéces particulières de nématodes et de bactéries étroitement associées. Dans le cas de plusieurs maladies d'insectes, les observations indiquent que le nématode ne peut survivre en l'absence de son partenaire spécifique. -
Anguina Tritici
Anguina tritici Scientific Name Anguina tritici (Steinbuch, 1799) Chitwood, 1935 Synonyms Anguillula tritici, Rhabditis tritici, Tylenchus scandens, Tylenchus tritici, and Vibrio tritici Common Name(s) Nematode: Wheat seed gall nematode Type of Pest Nematode Taxonomic Position Class: Secernentea, Order: Tylenchida, Family: Anguinidae Reason for Inclusion in Manual Pests of Economic and Environmental Concern Listing 2017 Background Information Anguina tritici was discovered in England in 1743 and was the first plant parasitic nematode to be recognized (Ferris, 2013). This nematode was first found in the United States in 1909 and subsequently found in numerous states, where it was primarily found in wheat but also in rye to a lesser extent (PERAL, 2015). Modern agricultural practices, including use of clean seed and crop rotation, have all but eliminated A. tritici in countries which have adopted these practices, and the nematode has not been found in the United States since 1975 (PERAL, 2015). However, A. tritici is still a problem in third world countries where such practices are not widely adapted (SON, n.d.). Figure 1: Brightfield light microscope images of an A. tritici female as seen under low power In addition, trade issues have arisen due to magnification. J. D. Eisenback, Virginia Tech, conflicting records of A. tritici in the United bugwood.org States (PERAL, 2015). 1 Figure 2: Wheat seed gall broken open to reveal Figure 3: Seed gall teased apart to reveal adult thousands of infective juveniles. Michael McClure, males and females and thousands of eggs. J. University of Arizona, bugwood.org D. Eisenback, Virginia Tech, bugwood.org Pest Description Measurements (From Swarup and Gupta (1971) and Krall (1991): Egg: 85 x 38 μm on average, but may also be larger (130 x 63 μm). -
Responses of Anguina Agrostis to Detergent and Anesthetic Treatment 1
Host Range, Biology, and Pathology of P. punctata: Radice et al. 165 rence of cyst nematodes (Heterodera spp.) in Michigan. 7. Radice, A. D., and P. M. Halisky. 1983. Nema- Plant Disease Reporter 55:399. todes parasitic on turfgrasses in New Jersey. New Jer- 3. Chitwood, B. G. 1949. Cyst formingHeterodera sey Academy Science 28:25 (Abstr.). encountered in soil sampling. Plant Disease Reporter 8. Radice, A. D., R. F. Myers, and P. M. Halisky. 33:130-131. 1983. The grass cyst nematode in New Jersey. Jour- 4. Dunn, R. A. 1969. Extraction of cysts of Het- nal of Nematology 15:4-8 (Abstr.). erodera species from soil by centrifugation in high 9. Spears, J. F. 1956. Occurrence of the grass cyst density solutions. Journal of Nematology 1:7 (Abstr.). nematode, Heterodera punctata, and Heterodera cacti 5. Horne, C. W. 1965. The taxonomic status, group cysts in North Dakota and Minnesota. Plant morphology and biology of a cyst nematode (Nema- Disease Reporter 40:583-584. toda:Heteroderidae) found attacking Poa annua L. 10. Thorne, G. 1928. Heteroder a punctata n. sp. a Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College nematode parasite on wheat roots from Saskatche- Station, Texas (Diss. Abstr. 65-12, 287). wan. Scientific Agriculture 8:707-710. 6. Horne, C. W., and W. H. Thames, Jr. 1966. 11. Wheeler, W. H. 1949. Interceptions of the Notes on occurrence and distribution of Heterodera genus Heterodera in foreign soil. Plant Disease Re- punctata. Plant Disease Reporter 50:869-871. porter 33:446. Journal of Nematology 17(2): 165-168. -
Rathayibacter Toxicus: a Dual Kingdom Pathogen Threatening Plants, Animals and Humans
Rathayibacter toxicus: A Dual Kingdom Pathogen Threatening Plants, Animals and Humans Anne Vidaver University of Nebraska-Lincoln Major Points • Bacterium (R. toxicus) needs a nematode vector • Potential nematodes vectors are in the U.S. • Plant hosts: many , esp. field grasses and cereals, incl. U.S. • Multiple corynetoxins produced • No immunity Major Reference • Recovery Plan for Rathayibacter Poisonng caused by Rathayibacter toxicus (syn. Clavibacter toxicus) , 2015, 28 pp. • National Plant Disease Recovery system: Plant Diseases that Threaten U.S. Agriculture • Select Agent • USDA: www. ars. usda.gov Corynetoxins Produced by R. toxicus • Members of tunicamycin family of antibiotics • Glycolipid sidechains – 16 variations • Heat stable • Highly toxic (3-6 mg/kg/ body weight) • Cumulative effect • No immunity • No effective vaccine to date Corynetoxin Structure Corynetoxin H17a, one of the major components of the Rathayibacter toxicus corynetoxins (Eckardt, 1983). Biological Safety, 5th ed., ASM • Biological Safety Considerations for Plant Pathogens and Plant-associated Microorganisms of Significance to Human Health • Anne Vidaver, Sue Tolin and Patricia Lambrecht • In press (2016) Potential Nematode Vectors in U.S. • Anguina agrostis: Bentgrass seed gall nematode • A. pacificae: Pacific shoot gall nematode. Host Poa annua • A. tritici: Wheat seed gall nematode. (Not reported in U.S. since 1975) • A. agropyronifloris: Host western wheatgrass (Agropyron smithii) U.S. Susceptibility • Cattle - 95 million • Sheep - 6 million • Horses - 9 million: race horses most valuable • Bison thousands • Other grazing animals • Humans? (contaminated cereals) The Annual Life Cycle of the Bacterium Causing Rathayibacter Poisoning This diagram is not drawn to scale. Not all animals consuming infected grasses die as a result. Challenges • The bacterium is not vector (nematode) specific • Host plants: many • Gumming, slime in plant seed heads (not always) • Can be undetected for years • The mechanism(s) underlying the production of toxins is unknown. -
Host Range of Anguina Amsinckiae Within the Genus Ansinckia
Notes brèves the other hand, the area method was applied to the BIRD, A. F. (1959). Development of the root-knot nematode average juvenile and the average female of H. sacchari. Meloidogyne javanica (Treub)and Meloidogynehapla The area values wereof 237.6 x 103pm3 for the female Chitwood in the tomato. Nenzatologica, 4 : 31-42. and of 8.9 x 103 pmZ for the juvenile and the ratio BIRD,A. F. (1971). Thestructure of nematodes. NewYork, equaled 26.7, which was very close to the value of 32 Academic Press, 318 p. observed by Bird (1959). COOK,R. (1977). The relationshipbetween feeding and Resultswere different on the two varieties. On fecundity of females of Heterodera avenue. Nematologica, " IR 1529 ", the development was more rapid than on 23 : 403-410. " Morobérékan " and the maximum valueof COD was DROIWN,V. H., MARTIN,G. C. & JOHNSON, R.W. (1958). higher. This effect of host varieties on the feedingof the Effect of osmotic concentration on hatching of some plant parasitehas been observed in Heteroderaavenue by parasitic nematodes. Nematologica, 3 : 115-126. Cook (1977). HOAGLAND,D. R. & ARNON, D.1. (1950). The water culture Between 4 and 5 weeks, the COD decreasedon method for growing plants without soil. Circ. Calif: agric. IR 1529 ". This was related with the presenceof some Exp. Stat.,No. 347. eggs in the nutritive solution of the jars. Thus, eggs formed by this species may be partly layed freely in soil. HOMINICK,W. M. (1983). Oxygen uptake during tanning of Thisdecrease of COD couldbe also related with Globodera rostochiensis. Revue Nématol., 6 : 199-206. -
Rathayibacter Poisoning
Recovery Plan For Rathayibacter Poisoning Caused by Rathayibacter toxicus (syn. Clavibacter toxicus) February, 2010 Contents: Page Executive Summary 2 Contributors and Reviewers 4 I. Introduction 5 II. Disease Development and Symptoms 7 III. Plant Infection, Spread of the Bacterium, and Animal Poisoning 10 IV. Monitoring and Detection 11 V. Response 12 VI. USDA Pathogen Permits 13 VII. Economic Impact and Compensation 14 VIII. Mitigation and Disease Management 14 IX. Infrastructure and Experts 15 X. Research, Extension, and Education 16 References 19 Web Resources 23 Appendices 24 This recovery plan is one of several disease-specific documents produced as part of the National Plant Disease Recovery System (NPDRS) called for in Homeland Security Presidential Directive Number 9 (HSPD-9). The purpose of the NPDRS is to ensure that the tools, infrastructure, communication networks, and capacity required to minimize the impact of high consequence plant disease outbreaks are available so that a adequate level of crop production is maintained. Each disease-specific plan is intended to provide a brief primer on the disease, assess the status of critical recovery components, and identify disease management research, extension, and education needs. These documents are not intended to be stand-alone documents that address all of the many and varied aspects of plant disease outbreaks and all of the decisions that must be made and actions taken to achieve effective response and recovery. They are, however, documents that will help the USDA to further guide efforts toward plant disease recovery. Executive Summary Rathayibacter (Clavibacter) toxicus was added to the Select Agent List in 2008 due primarily to the potential damage affecting domesticated forage-consuming animals in the U.S.