DOCSLIB.ORG

Collegiate Church

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SE A L ffîJP SAilIîT МАЖТГЛВРЙ ILE ФЖАБШ АШЭ Ж Е М А JOT'S (DİP A CJKYiPT. Jbi/CcAtÆjL'bfj if H ItfAUrKlJJtenyxJVaeKentnfad tuary тГи of St. Mariin-te-Grand, London, St. Martin’s-le-Grand, we fully be­ is in science, what experi ment is in na­ b o le r i* occupying lhe Sile типе appro­ lieve that it owed its distinctive privi­ tural philosophy, and evidence in law. b a te d to the N ew General Post Office ; lege, as a Sanctuary, to a Royal origi­ We shall now abstracta few of the cu­ chiefly founded on authentic and hitherto nal, according to the traditions. The rious contents of this well-digested vo­ trudtted Manuscript Documents, connected motive evidently was to suspend sum­ lume. In p. 20, concerning Abjuration, Really with the History o f the Fhunda- mary execution, and the reasoning in there is an interesting extract from Ras­ tia7l> and generally with ancient Customs times of more power and Yİolenpe, tali, but out readers may refer to L)u- and eminent Persons ; also Observations on would naturally be very different from eange sub voce, for a full explanation.—1 the different kinds o f Sanctuary formerly In p.67 we find, that Priests did marry recognized by the Common-Law. By Al­ our own, because interests would be fred Johu Kempe. Illustrated with En­ the prima mobilia of action.—It is cer­ in the time of Stephen, and endowed gravings o f the Vestiges o f the Collegiate tain that the Crypt here discovered has sons and daughters with the pstates of Church, the Common Seal, Sec, et», every Romanized form. religious foundations.—In p. 64, that en, 2L2. f t J - i . “ The vaultings wer« keyed with tiles, the walls of Londou were in the same TANNER says, that King Cad- turned up at the edges, resembling the wall reign in a ruinous condition.—-In p. an or some ancient Britons, about tiles common in Roman buildings, but 32, that the private seal oi William ďc he year 677, are said to have founded broader at one end tipu the other ; and the Turri had On its face a rebus of his College here ; and that about the workmen employed in pulling down the name ide la Tout), being a representa­ г 700, Victred or Wythred, King structure, stated, that between two of theae tion of the White Tower of London, Kent, re-founded it. As London tiles, the concave sides facing each other, under the dominion of the Kings was invariably thrust a smaller one In the the East Saxons at the time of the shape of a wedge.” P. 7. British Foundation, Mr. Mr. Essex has shown, that the impe (p. 4) very properly rejects the Saxons worked their wall tiles in the tassent, and supposes it some con­ Roman manner (see the Encyclopedia usion with a story of Jeffrey of Mon- o f Antiquities) ; and that, iherefore, —ih, that the Britons erected a it is by no means easy to distinguish hutch in memory of Cadwallo, one their work from the Roman, where his heroes, which Church, from there is not collateral evidence. Now rt of Gloucester, Mr. Kempe this does occur here ; far besides а cof­ tivw to have been St. Martin’s, fin * of the form used by the Romans of ate. He adds, the Lower Empire and Anglo-Saxons, “ That there тли, however, в building sp- a coin of Constantine was found on Vpiited to the worship,of the true Ood the spot, and the bases of the remains : the site of St- Martin-le-Grand, by the corresponded with the level of Roman surmounted by a heart ; and on the euly Christians of on? Island, is rendered Londinum. Pp. 7, 8. reverse, a fine antique intaglio of breek f probable, by the bull of Pope W e dwell with pleasure upon this workmanship representing Hercules, at, reciting die Church to be among subject, because a strange idea has [of the fondness of our ancestors for those «tempted mom episcopal jurisdiction, prevailed, that every building in this ancient gems, see Encycloped. of An- because they were founded before Bishops country is, withouťexception, of Nor- liquides, i. 210, 211]. In p. 124 we vert ordained in the kingdom, and episcopal man origin, and all its other anti- ^find the o ld custom of sitting injudg- jurisdiction had been usurped over them, * qqities connected with Noah and the ment at gates [of which see the bn- dong times of civil commotion, insurgente ark j whereas, the former opinion cyclopedia, i.6.113]. **JôOhd. III. proceUâ turbationis in regno,—Something merely originated with Mr. King’s ac- it appears, that when the King s Justices dto may perhaps be inferred of the high count of Rochester Castle, and the h eld th eir sittin g s in St. Martin s Gates istiquity of the Church, from the taint latter With Mr, Bryant, who, says Sir for the trial of prisoners for treason or ebesen Sa its patron. St, Martin appears to hns been а favourite with the early British William Gell, without any knowledge felony, the accused were placed betöre Girişlimi, many churches, considered of of Grecian antiquities, pronounced that, then»‘ on. the other side of the street, die highest antiquity in our island, being the citadel of Tiryns was formed from and carefully guarded from advancing --^-ted to him. pp. 4, 5. the ship of Danaus, and that. Troy forward ; for if they once passed the This is very judicious and correct, never existed. Forgers of coins and water channel which divided the mid­ nd only requires another addition, corruptor* of history, we consider as. dle of the street, they might claim the' jit, that, according.to Staveley, who enemies to learning and improvement; saving franchise of4the sacred precinct, -»an elaborate disquisition on Sane- in fact, as men, who disregard vera­ and the proceedings against them be* karies, (Church«, pp. 1Ö5— 177, ed. city, who make out the necessity of immediately annulled. In p. 148 we *j0» “ the King only, gnd not the research to be useless, and would, if find that no one within the sanctuary ■fye, or any other, could, might, or they directed their hypothetical pro­ was to have any weapon, “ only a ed grant this privilege of Sanctuary ” pensities to law or medicine, be dan­ reasonable knife to kerve withall his (P- 170) ; and that this was the fact is gerous beyond description. Research meste, and that the said knife be poini- lesse." At the present day, only carv­ "•dent, from the privilege still annex­ * la voi. LXXXViii. il. pp. * 7 t, 398, will ed to the “ Verge of Court,” Holyrood be found aa account of these discoveries, ing, butchers’, and oyster knives are House, &c. Whoever, therefore, were witii a Plan and two Views of the Crypts, made with points, which fashion may- “•e subsequent subjects who refounded Coffin, &e<—EpiT. have originated in ancient prohibitions ; at all events, pointless' eating knives are not modern.—ín p. 208 we find one of the occupiers of a im é n tin Dove-ailey to be a “ Mother Marget, Brecon ” This was m the, time o! Henry Vili.*, айв . Л е , of wh,ch Apothecaries are now so appetenti was 'then ascribed to a n “ Old woman doc- tress. Here we shkll leave this neat and ound little volume, which does .Mr. Kenroe great crediti by tV Л £*№-•' ч Ы, are not modern.—In .. fw ilence, what experiment is in 11a- ,a ihilosophy, and evidence in law. one of the ot ders of a ten . щ VV hall now abstract a few of the cu- Dove-alley to i. a “ Mother Marg^ ious contents of this well-digested vo- Surgeon.” This was in the time | Ï ime. In p. 20, concerning Abjuration, Henry VIII.; and this title, of whit ‘ here is an interesnog extract from Ras­ Apothecaries arc now so appetent, wi ili, but out readers may refer to Du­ then ascribed to an ** Old woman d« $5? L- inge sub voce, (br a full explanation.— tress.” n p. 57 we find, that Priests did marry Here we shall, leave this neat aj ill.. th(..íe time‘ of" "Stephen, ' and' endowed~~л ' sound little volume, which does Ы uns and daughters with the estates of Kempe great credit. * ..uzeti form. Jigious foundations.—In p. 64, that . j vaultings were kej íe grails of London were in the same ,e i up at the edges, resev* ■ign in a ruinous condition.—In p. 49. A Memoir of Thomas Green, Esq. 4 common in Roman > . 4iat the private seal of William dc Ipswich ; with a Critique on his Wrilny 'er at one end than the . and an Account q f his Family caul Const ■ J on its face a rebus of his trons. 4io, pp. 8S. Printed by John Hi леи employed m pv-' * ^'our), being a representa- ture, stated, that betw- V ‘hite Tower of London, THIS elegantyolume, of which the concave sides far “ impression is limited to One Hu »variably thrust a sic. dred Copies, to be presented to t of a wedge.’* P. 7. more immediate and intimate F rien ‘ ,r. Essex has sho _ of the Deceased,” is highly creditai ■ ins worked their to to the Ipswich press, and is adorm ian manner (see th with an admirable portrait engrat Antiquities) j and tl by Worthington. i- s by no means easy O f Mr. Green, a brief, but corn work érőm the ř memoir will be found in our Obitu гв is not collateral evu.
Recommended publications
  • Tonbridge Castle and Its Lords

    Tonbridge Castle and Its Lords

    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 16 1886 TONBRIDGE OASTLE AND ITS LORDS. BY J. F. WADMORE, A.R.I.B.A. ALTHOUGH we may gain much, useful information from Lambard, Hasted, Furley, and others, who have written on this subject, yet I venture to think that there are historical points and features in connection with this building, and the remarkable mound within it, which will be found fresh and interesting. I propose therefore to give an account of the mound and castle, as far as may be from pre-historic times, in connection with the Lords of the Castle and its successive owners. THE MOUND. Some years since, Dr. Fleming, who then resided at the castle, discovered on the mound a coin of Con- stantine, minted at Treves. Few will be disposed to dispute the inference, that the mound existed pre- viously to the coins resting upon it. We must not, however, hastily assume that the mound is of Roman origin, either as regards date or construction. The numerous earthworks and camps which are even now to be found scattered over the British islands are mainly of pre-historic date, although some mounds may be considered Saxon, and others Danish. Many are even now familiarly spoken of as Caesar's or Vespa- sian's camps, like those at East Hampstead (Berks), Folkestone, Amesbury, and Bensbury at Wimbledon. Yet these are in no case to be confounded with Roman TONBEIDGHE CASTLE AND ITS LORDS. 13 camps, which in the times of the Consulate were always square, although under the Emperors both square and oblong shapes were used.* These British camps or burys are of all shapes and sizes, taking their form and configuration from the hill-tops on which they were generally placed.
  • Some Seventeenth Century Letters and P E T I T I O N S Erom T H E M U N I M E N T S O F T H E Dean a N D C H a P T E R O E C a N T E R B U R Y

    Some Seventeenth Century Letters and P E T I T I O N S Erom T H E M U N I M E N T S O F T H E Dean a N D C H a P T E R O E C a N T E R B U R Y

    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society ( 93 ) SOME SEVENTEENTH CENTURY LETTERS AND P E T I T I O N S EROM T H E M U N I M E N T S O F T H E DEAN A N D C H A P T E R O E C A N T E R B U R Y . EDITED BY 0. EVELEIGH WOODRUFF, M.A. INTRODUCTION THE thirty-two letters and petitions which, by the courtesy of the Dean and Chapter, I have been permitted to trans- cribe, and now to offer to the Kent Archasological Society for pubhcation, were written—with the exception of three or four—in the seventeenth century, on the eve of the troublous times which culminated in the overthrow of Church and King, or in the years immediately fohowing the restoration of the monarchy when deans and chapters, once more in possession of their churches, and estates, were reviving the worship and customs which had been for many years in abeyance. One letter, however, is of earher date than the seventeenth century and three are later. Thus number one is from the pen of Dr. Nicholas Wotton, the first dean of the New Eoundation. Wotton, who was much employed in affairs of state, did not spend much time at Canterbury. His letter, which is dated from London, February 11th, 1564-5, is addressed to his brethren the prebendaries of Canterbury, and its purport is to inform them that Sir Thomas Gresham has offered to build, at his own proper cost and charges, a new Royal Exchange in the city of London.
  • John Pecham on Life and Mind Caleb G

    John Pecham on Life and Mind Caleb G

    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2014 John Pecham on Life and Mind Caleb G. Colley University of South Carolina - Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Colley, C. G.(2014). John Pecham on Life and Mind. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/ 2743 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOHN PECHAM ON LIFE AND MIND by Caleb Glenn Colley ! Bachelor of Arts Freed-Hardeman !University, 2006 Bachelor of Science Freed-Hardeman !University, 2006 Master of Liberal Arts ! Faulkner University, 2009 ! ! Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2014 Accepted by: Jeremiah M.G. Hackett, Major Professor Jerald T. Wallulis, Committee Member Heike O. Sefrin-Weis, Committee Member Gordon A. Wilson, Committee Member Lacy Ford, Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! © Copyright by Caleb Glenn Colley, 2014 All Rights !Reserved. !ii ! ! ! ! DEDICATION To my parents, who have always encouraged and inspired me. Et sunt animae vestrae quasi mea. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !iii ! ! ! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A number of people have spent generous amounts of time and energy to assist in the preparation of this dissertation. Professor Girard J. Etzkorn, the editor of Pecham’s texts, is not listed as a committee member, but he read my manuscript in its early form and made many helpful suggestions.
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day

    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day

    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................
  • York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399

    York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399

    York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 Edited by David M. Smith 2020 www.york.ac.uk/borthwick archbishopsregisters.york.ac.uk Online images of the Archbishops’ Registers cited in this edition can be found on the York’s Archbishops’ Registers Revealed website. The conservation, imaging and technical development work behind the digitisation project was delivered thanks to funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Register of Alexander Neville 1374-1388 Register of Thomas Arundel 1388-1396 Sede Vacante Register 1397 Register of Robert Waldby 1397 Sede Vacante Register 1398 Register of Richard Scrope 1398-1405 YORK CLERGY ORDINATIONS 1374-1399 Edited by DAVID M. SMITH 2020 CONTENTS Introduction v Ordinations held 1374-1399 vii Editorial notes xiv Abbreviations xvi York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 1 Index of Ordinands 169 Index of Religious 249 Index of Titles 259 Index of Places 275 INTRODUCTION This fifth volume of medieval clerical ordinations at York covers the years 1374 to 1399, spanning the archiepiscopates of Alexander Neville, Thomas Arundel, Robert Waldby and the earlier years of Richard Scrope, and also including sede vacante ordinations lists for 1397 and 1398, each of which latter survive in duplicate copies. There have, not unexpectedly, been considerable archival losses too, as some later vacancy inventories at York make clear: the Durham sede vacante register of Alexander Neville (1381) and accompanying visitation records; the York sede vacante register after Neville’s own translation in 1388; the register of Thomas Arundel (only the register of his vicars-general survives today), and the register of Robert Waldby (likewise only his vicar-general’s register is now extant) have all long disappeared.1 Some of these would also have included records of ordinations, now missing from the chronological sequence.
  • Nathanael Greene Papers, List of Contributors

    Nathanael Greene Papers, List of Contributors

    Nathanael Green Papers William L. Clements Library List of Contributors The University of Michigan Finding Aid: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/clementsead/umich-wcl-M-337gre?view=text For more details, see the Clements Library card catalog. Abeel, James Blount, Reading Alexander, Nataniel, d.1808 Blount, William, 1749-1800 Anderson, Robert Bostwick, Andrew Andrews, John Bourne, Benjamin, 1755-1808 Andrews, Richard Bowen, Ephraim Anthony, Joseph Bowen, Jabez Armstrong, John Bowen, Oiver Armstrong, James Bowman, Jr. Armstrong, Thomas Boyle, Richard Arnold, Jonathan Bradley, John Arnold, Welcome Branham, Ebenezer Arthur, James Bratton, William Baddeley, John Bren, Chevalier de Bagge, Traugott Brice, Walker, & Craike Bainbridge, Peter Brickell, John Baker, Richard B. Brodhead, Daniel, 1736-1809 Balfour, Nisbet, 1743-1823 Brown, Benjamin Banks, Henry Brown, John, 1736-1803 Banks, John, -1784 Brown, Joseph Barbe-Marbois, Francois Marbois, Brown, W marqis de, 1745-1837 Browne, James Barbee, Thomas Brownfield, Robert Bard, Peter Brownson, Nathan], d.1796 Barnwell, John Bruff, James Barry, Henry, 1750-1822 Buford, Abraham, 1749-1833 Baylor, George, 1752-1784 Burke, Aedanus, 1743-1802 Beall, William [Dent], -1829 Burke, Thomas, c. 1747-1783 Bentley, William Burllinggam, Samuel; Porter, Nathan Bently, Mrs. Barbara Burnet, Ichabod, 1755-1783 Berryhill, John Burnet, William Biddle, Clement, 1740-1814 Burnside, John, d.1781 Bigham, John Buford, Abraham, 1749-1833 Bignall, [Robert]; Hawkins, [Benjamin], Burton, Robert 1754-1816 Burwell, Lewis, -1800 Blaau,
  • Fifteenth Century Literary Culture with Particular

    Fifteenth Century Literary Culture with Particular

    FIFTEENTH CENTURY LITERARY CULTURE WITH PARTICULAR* REFERENCE TO THE PATTERNS OF PATRONAGE, **FOCUSSING ON THE PATRONAGE OF THE STAFFORD FAMILY DURING THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY Elizabeth Ann Urquhart Submitted for the Degree of Ph.!)., September, 1985. Department of English Language, University of Sheffield. .1 ''CONTENTS page SUMMARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ill INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 The Stafford Family 1066-1521 12 CHAPTER 2 How the Staffords could Afford Patronage 34 CHAPTER 3 The PrIce of Patronage 46 CHAPTER 4 The Staffords 1 Ownership of Books: (a) The Nature of the Evidence 56 (b) The Scope of the Survey 64 (c) Survey of the Staffords' Book Ownership, c. 1372-1521 66 (d) Survey of the Bourgchiers' Book Ownership, c. 1420-1523 209 CHAPTER 5 Considerations Arising from the Study of Stafford and Bourgchier Books 235 CHAPTER 6 A Brief Discussion of Book Ownership and Patronage Patterns amongst some of the Staffords' and Bourgchiers' Contemporaries 252 CONCLUSION A Piece in the Jigsaw 293 APPENDIX Duke Edward's Purchases of Printed Books and Manuscripts: Books Mentioned in some Surviving Accounts. 302 NOTES 306 TABLES 367 BIBLIOGRAPHY 379 FIFTEENTR CENTURY LITERARY CULTURE WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE PATTERNS OF PATRONAGE, FOCUSSING ON THE PATRONAGE OF THE STAFFORD FAMILY DURING THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY. Elizabeth Ann Urquhart. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D., September, 1985. Department of English Language, University of Sheffield. SUMMARY The aim of this study is to investigate the nature of the r61e played by literary patronage in fostering fifteenth century English literature. The topic is approached by means of a detailed exam- ination of the books and patronage of the Stafford family.
  • Leicestershire Parish Registers

    Leicestershire Parish Registers

    Le i c e s t e r s h i r e Pa r i s h Re g i s t e r s . m r ar iages . ED ITED BY W . P P I . A . W H LLIM R M . O E , , A ND H B M L P . OS. AGG . S. A T , I . l oubou Issunp TO m s Sunscn mnn s B Y PH ILLIMORE 8: Co . , 1 2 H A NCERY LA N . 4 , C E 1 908 . P R E F A C E . The presen t vol ume i s the fi r st of a series which the Editor s hope will be con tin ued un til all the Pari sh Regi ster s of eices er s i re a e een r in e In the n ei ourin L t h h v b p t d . ghb g coun ty of N otti n gham a similar ser ies was begun eleven ears a o i t the resu a at the r esen ime the y g , w h lt th t p t t an cien r e i s er s of o e r on e un r e ari s es or al the t g t v h d d p h , h f en i re coun a e een tran scr i e an d mos of e m t ty, h v b b d, t th r i n p t ed . In the a sen ce of a n a i e en usia M r .
  • Robert De STAFFORD Born

    Robert De STAFFORD Born

    Robert De STAFFORD Born: 1216, Stafford Castle, Staffordshire, England Died: 4 Jun 1261 / 1282 / AFT 15 Jul 1287Notes: summoned to serve in Wales in 1260. Cokayne's "Complete Peerage" (STAFFORD, p.171-172) Father: Henry De STAFFORD Mother: Pernell De FERRERS Married: Alice CORBET (dau. of Thomas De Corbet and Isabel De Valletort) ABT 1240, Shropshire, England Children: 1. Alice De STAFFORD 2. Nicholas De STAFFORD 3. Isabella De STAFFORD 4. Amabil De STAFFORD Alice De STAFFORD Born: ABT 1240, Stafford, England Father: Robert De STAFFORD Mother: Alice CORBET Married: John De HOTHAM (Sir) Children: 1. John De HOTHAM 2. Peter De HOTHAM Isabella De STAFFORD Born: 1265 Father: Robert De STAFFORD Mother: Alice CORBET Married: William STAFFORD Children: 1. John STAFFORD Amabil De STAFFORD Father: Robert De STAFFORD Mother: Alice CORBET Married: Richard (Robert) RADCLIFFE Nicholas De STAFFORD Born: 1246, Stafford, England Died: 1 Aug 1287, Siege of Droselan Castle Notes: actively engaged against the Welsh, in the reign of King Edward I, and was killed before Droselan Castle. His manors included Offley, Schelbedon and Bradley, Staffordshire Father: Robert De STAFFORD Mother: Alice CORBET Married 1: Anne De LANGLEY Married 2: Eleanor De CLINTON Children: 1. Richard De STAFFORD 2. Edmund STAFFORD (1º B. Stafford) Edmund STAFFORD (1º B. Stafford) Born: 15 Jul 1272/3, Clifton, Staffordshire, England Died: 26 Aug 1308 Father: Nicholas De STAFFORD Mother: Eleanor De CLINTON Married: Margaret BASSETT (B. Stafford) BEF 1298, Drayton, Staffordshire, England Children: 1. Ralph STAFFORD (1º E. Stafford) 2. Richard STAFFORD (Sir Knight) 3. Margaret STAFFORD 4. William STAFFORD 5.
  • John Hendrix Keywords Architecture As Cosmology

    John Hendrix Keywords Architecture As Cosmology

    John Hendrix Keywords Architecture as Cosmology: Lincoln Cathedral and English Gothic Architecture architecture, cosmology, Lincoln Cathedral, Lincoln Academy, English Gothic Architecture, Robert Grosseteste (Commentary on the Physics, Commentary on the Posterior Analytics, Computus Correctorius, Computus Minor, De Artibus Liberalibus, De Calore Solis, De Colore, De Generatione Sonorum, De Generatione Stellarum, De Impressionibus Elementorum, De Iride, De Libero Arbitrio, De Lineis, De Luce, De Motu Corporali at Luce, De Motu Supercaelestium, De Natura Locorum, De Sphaera, Ecclesia Sancta, Epistolae, Hexaemeron), medieval, University of Lincoln, Early English, Decorated, Curvilinear, Perpendicular, Catholic, Durham Cathedral, Canterbury Cathedral, Anselm of Canterbury, Gervase of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, Becket’s Crown, Trinity Chapel, Scholasticism, William of Sens, William the Englishman, Geoffrey de Noyers, Saint Hugh of Avalon, Saint Hugh’s Choir, Bishop’s Eye, Dean’s Eye, Nikolaus Pevsner (Buildings of England, Cathedrals of England, Leaves of Southwell, An Outline of European Architecture), Paul Frankl (Gothic Architecture), Oxford University, Franciscan School, Plato (Republic, Timaeus), Aristotle (De anima, De Caelo, Metaphysics, Physics, Posterior Analytics), Plotinus (Enneads), Wells Cathedral, Ely Cathedral, Hereford Cathedral, Lichfield Cathedral, Winchester Cathedral, Beverley Minster, Chester Cathedral, York Minster, Worcester Cathedral, Salisbury Cathedral, Southwell Minster, Gloucester Cathedral, Westminster Abbey, Elias
  • Archbishop of Canterbury, and One of the Things This Meant Was That Fruit Orchards Would Be Established for the Monasteries

    Archbishop of Canterbury, and One of the Things This Meant Was That Fruit Orchards Would Be Established for the Monasteries

    THE ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY And yet — in fact you need only draw a single thread at any point you choose out of the fabric of life and the run will make a pathway across the whole, and down that wider pathway each of the other threads will become successively visible, one by one. — Heimito von Doderer, DIE DÂIMONEN “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Archbishops of Canterb HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 597 CE Christianity was established among the Anglo-Saxons in Kent by Augustine (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), who in this year became the 1st Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the things this meant was that fruit orchards would be established for the monasteries. Despite repeated Viking attacks many of these survived. The monastery at Ely (Cambridgeshire) would be particularly famous for its orchards and vineyards. DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION? GOOD. Archbishops of Canterbury “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 604 CE May 26, 604: Augustine died (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), and Laurentius succeeded him as Archbishop of Canterbury.
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Archbishops of Canterbury – Universities Attended Abbreviations: B

    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Archbishops of Canterbury – Universities Attended Abbreviations: B

    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Archbishops of Canterbury – Universities attended abbreviations: b. = born. c or c. = circa. e = education. e. = educated. esp. = especially. nr. = near. s = school. (ap) = apparently. (pr) = probably. (ps) = possibly. (r) = reputedly. 105th 2013- Justin Portal Welby (b. 1956) Trinity College Cambridge BA 78; St John’s College Durham BA 91. 104th 2002-2012 Rowan Douglas Williams (b. 1950) Christ’s College Cambridge BA 71, MA 75; Wadham College, Oxford DPhil 75; DD 89. 103rd 1991-2002 George Leonard Carey (b.1935) London College of Divinity. King's College London. Associate of the London College of Divinity 1st class 1961, BD Hons 1962 (London), MTh1965 (London), PhD1971 (London). 102nd 1980-1991 Robert Alexander Kennedy Runcie (1921-2000) Brasenose College Oxford (1 year). Sandhurst (trained for Guards Armoured Division). Brasenose College Oxford. BA (1st class lit. hum) 1948, MA 1948. 101st 1974-1980 Frederick Donald Coggan (1909-2000) St John's College Cambridge. 1st class oriental languages tripos part i 1930, BA (1st class oriental languages tripos part ii), MA 1935. 100th 1961-1974 Arthur Michael Ramsey (1904-1988) Magdalene College Cambridge. 2nd class classical tripos part i 1925, BA (1st class theological tripos part i) 1927, MA1930, BD1950. 99th 1945-1961 Geoffrey Francis Fisher (1887-1972) Exeter College Oxford. 1st class classical honour moderations 1908, BA (1st class literae humaniores) 1910, 1st class theology 1911, MA1913. 98th 1942-1944 William Temple (1881-1944) Balliol College Oxford. 1st class honour moderations 1902 & literae humaniores 1904. 97th 1928-1941 William Cosmo Gordon Lang (1864-1945) Glasgow. MA. Balliol College Oxford.