DOCSLIB.ORG

Feynman Diagram Approach to Dynamical Casimir Effect

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feynman Diagram Approach to Dynamical Casimir Effect ЖЭТФ FEYNMAN DIAGRAM APPROACH TO DYNAMICAL CASIMIR EFFECT Yusong Cao a;b*, Yanxia Liu a a Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China b School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China In this paper we study a optomechnical system enclosed by a optical cavity with one mirror attached to a spring as a closed quantum system. We provide a different sight of view of studying the backaction effect from the quantum field to the mirror. Instead of concentrating on the force exerted on the mirror, we focus on the energy transferring of the process, which encourages us to use the Feynman diagram method in weak coupling regime. We show that the observed photon frequency, mirror oscillation frequency and ground state energy are shifted as a result of emission and absorbtion of virtual particles. We emphasis that the integrals in the loop diagrams are convergent, which means by treating the motion of the mirror with quantum mechanics, we get finite result in energy transferring process. At last we use Feynman diagrams to give the transition amplitudes of general dynamical Casimir process. 1. INTRODUCTION (1) the motion of boundary must be introduced prior [10–13] and (2) when examining the backaction from In quantum mechanics, one of the most anti- quantum field to the boundary, one can only get the intuitive thing is the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, result at an average level [11–15]. The infinities in the as a result of which, the quantum harmonic oscillator backaction force from the vacuum to the boundary has is still moving even at the ground state. When it comes plagued the construction of a consistent dynamical the- to the systems that allow the creation and annihilation ory of the boundary for some time. To solve this prob- of particles, say, in quantum field theory, it tells us two lem, several regularization methods have been devel- things (1) there are virtual particles emerges from vac- oped [14,16]. In this paper, we tackle the problem from uum and quickly annihilates again [1, 2] and (2) the a different angle: we quantize the motion of boundary absolute energy of the vacuum state is infinity without and treat the whole system as a closed system [17–19]. normal ordering technique [3]. One of the astonishinng To get a hold of the picture, we noticed that one of the results is if the background field or boundary condi- most significance difference between the quantum me- tion of the quantum vacuum is properly modulated, it chanics and classical mechanics is the existence of quan- is possible to convert virtual particles of vacuum into tum fluctuation. New effects of purely quantum nature real ones. In practice, such phenomenons are called can emerge if we quantize the classically moving sub- dynamical Casimir effect [4, 5] due to the modulation jects. For example, when we treat the charged current of boundary condition of the cavity field, cosmologi- in electromagnetic vacuum with quantum mechanics, cal particle creation as a result of varying size of the such effects as Lamb shifts of electronic energy levels, background flat spacetime [6], Hawking radiation from anomaly magnetic moment, renormalization of charge, curved spacetime [7, 8], Unruh effect for a accelerated effective photon-photon interaction will take place due observer in vacuum [9] and spontaneous radiation for arXiv:2103.10657v1 [quant-ph] 19 Mar 2021 to the fluctuation of electromagnetic vacuum [3]. a charged current is placed in electromagnetic vacuum [3]. In this paper, we study a optomechanical system en- Most of the treatments for such systems are semi- closed by a cavity with one mirror attached to a spring classical: treat field with quantum mechanics and the as a closed quantum system. In weak coupling regime, background field/moving boundary with classical me- we use Feynman diagram method to study three things, chanics [4-14]. Such treatments has two drawbacks, (1) the backaction effect of photons on the mirror, (2) the effect of quantum fluctuation of the quantized mir- * E-mail: [email protected] ror on the photons and (3) the shift of the ground 1 Yusong Cao, Yanxia Liu ЖЭТФ ity when the spring is at its relaxion. Together with the spring, the mirror behaves like a simple harmonic oscillator. The radiation pressure on the mirror can be k viewed as driving force to the harmonic oscillator. And the motion of the mirror will squeeze the cavity field. The radiation pressure is small compared to the elastic c force from the spring, so the mirror’s sphere of activity is much smaller compared to the length L. The Hamiltonian of the model was first proposed in the work of Law [21]. The Hamiltonian (~ = c = 1) is L given as H = H0 + V , with the free term y y H0 = !ca a + !mb b; (1) Fig. 1. The sketch map for our system: A optical cavity where a is the cavity field operator and the frequency with one side fixed, while another side attached to a spring is !c = nπ=L, with n for the mode number of the given which forms a simple harmonic oscillator. The radiation frequency !c. Note that the polarization of the cavity pressure of cavity field acts on the mirror as drive force field is not important in the processes we will study of the oscillator while the motion of the mirror squeezes later, so we choose only one polarization of the cavity the cavity field. field in our Hamiltonian [19]. And b is the annihila- tion operator of the simple harmonic oscillator of form b = p m!m (x + ip ), with x and p are the position state energy from quantum fluctuation of the vacuum 2 m!m and momentum of the oscillator. The frequency of har- field and the mirror. With Feynman diagram method, q k we compute the transition rates of general dynamical monic oscillator is given by !m = m . The exciton Casimir effect processes (i.e. the transition of phonons number of harmonic oscillator is also refered as phonon into photon pairs). This paper is organized as follows. number [1]. The interaction term is split into two parts: In Sec.2, we give a brief introduction of our model V = Vom + VDCE, the first part Hamiltonian and demonstrate the Feynman rules of y y Vom = ga a(b + b ) (2) our model. In Sec.3, we calculate the frequency shifts of the mirror’s oscillation due to the backaction from is called the standard optomechanical coupling term. field vacuum and show that the integrals in the formu- This term conserves the number of photon [20]. The las are convergent, and why the infinity of frequency parameter g is called the coupling constant. And the shift of phonon in resonance brings no inconsistency. second term In Sec.4, we compute the energy shift of the system’s g V = [a2 + (ay)2](b + by) (3) ground state from vacuum-vacuum process. In Sec.5, DCE 2 we calculate the frequency shift of cavity photon due is called dynamical Casimir effect term being respon- to the quantum fluctuation of the mirror. In Sec.6, we sible for dynamical Casimir effect process, which in- compute the decay width of the mirror’s oscillation en- troduces the transformations between the phonons and ergy quanta at resonance and transition amplitudes of photons. In the weak coupling regime !c;!mg, the some dynamical Casimir processes and compare them optomechanical coupling term Vom plays the dominant with the results qualitatively in previous work [20]. In role and the effects of dynamical Casimir effect term is Sec.7, we give a conclusion of our results and give some hard to observe [20]. In this paper, we will neglect the discussion. dispassion and treat the system as a closed quantum system. Like it is in the case of Rabi model [22], the optome- 2. MODEL HAMILTONIAN AND FEYNAMN RULES chanical system under consideration can be viewed as an anology to the cavity QED system, which is consid- The system we will study in this paper is a cavity ered a simplified version of quantum electrodynamics. with one mirror fixed and another one attached to a In this sense, we are encouraged to apply the Feyn- spring, the schematic of which will be demonstrated in man diagram method. In weak coupling regime, it is Fig.(1). The mass of the movable mirror is m and the of high accuracy computing the processes to the low- strength of the spring is k. L is the length of the cav- est order of g. The momentum space Feynman rules 2 ЖЭТФ Feynman diagram approach to Dynamical Casimir effect (a) (b) i = (a) E − ωm + iϵ E1 = 1 i ωm ωm = E − ωc + iϵ (c) g = − i E2 2 d ( ) (b) E1 ig = − E2 ωm ωm E3 Fig. 2. Basic Feynman diagrams in our system. Note that there are two kinds of vertices of different coupling E strength: (c) square for the optomechanical interaction 4 and (d) dot for the Dynamical Casimir effect interaction. The crosses in (a) and (b) denote the vertices attached to the particle line, whose type of origin are irrelevant Fig. 3. The irreducible diagrams of phonon propagator. to the value of the lines. The legs of the lines attached (a) Diagram of two virtual photons in virtual process. to the vertices looks short thus we name them "Corgi (b) Diagram of a propagating phonon glued to a vacuum- diagrams". vacuum diagram with one virtual phonon and two virtual photons.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Union of Quantum Field Theory and Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics
    The Union of Quantum Field Theory and Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics Thesis by Anthony Bartolotta In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 24, 2018 ii c 2018 Anthony Bartolotta ORCID: 0000-0003-4971-9545 All rights reserved iii Acknowledgments My time as a graduate student at Caltech has been a journey for me, both professionally and personally. This journey would not have been possible without the support of many individuals. First, I would like to thank my advisors, Sean Carroll and Mark Wise. Without their support, this thesis would not have been written. Despite entering Caltech with weaker technical skills than many of my fellow graduate students, Mark took me on as a student and gave me my first project. Mark also granted me the freedom to pursue my own interests, which proved instrumental in my decision to work on non-equilibrium thermodynamics. I am deeply grateful for being provided this priviledge and for his con- tinued input on my research direction. Sean has been an incredibly effective research advisor, despite being a newcomer to the field of non-equilibrium thermodynamics. Sean was the organizing force behind our first paper on this topic and connected me with other scientists in the broader community; at every step Sean has tried to smoothly transition me from the world of particle physics to that of non-equilibrium thermody- namics. My research would not have been nearly as fruitful without his support. I would also like to thank the other two members of my thesis and candidacy com- mittees, John Preskill and Keith Schwab.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: the Interaction Picture
    Appendix: The Interaction Picture The technique of expressing operators and quantum states in the so-called interaction picture is of great importance in treating quantum-mechanical problems in a perturbative fashion. It plays an important role, for example, in the derivation of the Born–Markov master equation for decoherence detailed in Sect. 4.2.2. We shall review the basics of the interaction-picture approach in the following. We begin by considering a Hamiltonian of the form Hˆ = Hˆ0 + V.ˆ (A.1) Here Hˆ0 denotes the part of the Hamiltonian that describes the free (un- perturbed) evolution of a system S, whereas Vˆ is some added external per- turbation. In applications of the interaction-picture formalism, Vˆ is typically assumed to be weak in comparison with Hˆ0, and the idea is then to deter- mine the approximate dynamics of the system given this assumption. In the following, however, we shall proceed with exact calculations only and make no assumption about the relative strengths of the two components Hˆ0 and Vˆ . From standard quantum theory, we know that the expectation value of an operator observable Aˆ(t) is given by the trace rule [see (2.17)], & ' & ' ˆ ˆ Aˆ(t) =Tr Aˆ(t)ˆρ(t) =Tr Aˆ(t)e−iHtρˆ(0)eiHt . (A.2) For reasons that will immediately become obvious, let us rewrite this expres- sion as & ' ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ Aˆ(t) =Tr eiH0tAˆ(t)e−iH0t eiH0te−iHtρˆ(0)eiHte−iH0t . (A.3) ˆ In inserting the time-evolution operators e±iH0t at the beginning and the end of the expression in square brackets, we have made use of the fact that the trace is cyclic under permutations of the arguments, i.e., that Tr AˆBˆCˆ ··· =Tr BˆCˆ ···Aˆ , etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory II
    Quantum Field Theory II T. Nguyen PHY 391 Independent Study Term Paper Prof. S.G. Rajeev University of Rochester April 20, 2018 1 Introduction The purpose of this independent study is to familiarize ourselves with the fundamental concepts of quantum field theory. In this paper, I discuss how the theory incorporates the interactions between quantum systems. With the success of the free Klein-Gordon field theory, ultimately we want to introduce the field interactions into our picture. Any interaction will modify the Klein-Gordon equation and thus its Lagrange density. Consider, for example, when the field interacts with an external source J(x). The Klein-Gordon equation and its Lagrange density are µ 2 (@µ@ + m )φ(x) = J(x); 1 m2 L = @ φ∂µφ − φ2 + Jφ. 2 µ 2 In a relativistic quantum field theory, we want to describe the self-interaction of the field and the interaction with other dynamical fields. This paper is based on my lecture for the Kapitza Society. The second section will discuss the concept of symmetry and conservation. The third section will discuss the self-interacting φ4 theory. Lastly, in the fourth section, I will briefly introduce the interaction (Dirac) picture and solve for the time evolution operator. 2 Noether's Theorem 2.1 Symmetries and Conservation Laws In 1918, the mathematician Emmy Noether published what is now known as the first Noether's Theorem. The theorem informally states that for every continuous symmetry there exists a corresponding conservation law. For example, the conservation of energy is a result of a time symmetry, the conservation of linear momentum is a result of a plane symmetry, and the conservation of angular momentum is a result of a spherical symmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Path Integral and Asset Pricing
    Path Integral and Asset Pricing Zura Kakushadze§†1 § Quantigicr Solutions LLC 1127 High Ridge Road #135, Stamford, CT 06905 2 † Free University of Tbilisi, Business School & School of Physics 240, David Agmashenebeli Alley, Tbilisi, 0159, Georgia (October 6, 2014; revised: February 20, 2015) Abstract We give a pragmatic/pedagogical discussion of using Euclidean path in- tegral in asset pricing. We then illustrate the path integral approach on short-rate models. By understanding the change of path integral measure in the Vasicek/Hull-White model, we can apply the same techniques to “less- tractable” models such as the Black-Karasinski model. We give explicit for- mulas for computing the bond pricing function in such models in the analog of quantum mechanical “semiclassical” approximation. We also outline how to apply perturbative quantum mechanical techniques beyond the “semiclas- sical” approximation, which are facilitated by Feynman diagrams. arXiv:1410.1611v4 [q-fin.MF] 10 Aug 2016 1 Zura Kakushadze, Ph.D., is the President of Quantigicr Solutions LLC, and a Full Professor at Free University of Tbilisi. Email: [email protected] 2 DISCLAIMER: This address is used by the corresponding author for no purpose other than to indicate his professional affiliation as is customary in publications. In particular, the contents of this paper are not intended as an investment, legal, tax or any other such advice, and in no way represent views of Quantigic Solutions LLC, the website www.quantigic.com or any of their other affiliates. 1 Introduction In his seminal paper on path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, Feynman (1948) humbly states: “The formulation is mathematically equivalent to the more usual formulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Notice: the Quantum Revolution in Philosophy (Richard Healey; Oxford University Press, 2017)
    Critical notice: The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy (Richard Healey; Oxford University Press, 2017) DAVID WALLACE Richard Healey’s The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy is a terrific book, and yet I disagree with nearly all its main substantive conclusions. The purpose of this review is to say why the book is well worth your time if you have any interest in the interpretation of quantum theory or in the general philosophy of science, and yet why in the end I think Healey’s ambitious project fails to achieve its full goals. The quantum measurement problem is the central problem in philosophy of quantum mechanics, and arguably the most important issue in philosophy of physics more generally; not coincidentally, it has seen some of the field’s best work, and some of its most effective engagement with physics. Yet the debate in the field largely now appears deadlocked: the last few years have seen developments in our understanding of many of the proposed solutions, but not much movement in the overall dialectic. This is perhaps clearest with a little distance: metaphysicians who need to refer to quantum mechanics increasingly tend to talk of “the three main interpretations” (they mean: de Broglie and Bohm’s hidden variable theory; Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber’s (‘GRW’) dynamical-collapse theory; Everett’s many- universes theory) and couch their discussions so as to be, as much as possible, equally valid for any of those three. It is not infrequent for philosophers of physics to use the familiar framework of underdetermination of theory by evidence to discuss the measurement problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction Representation
    Interaction Representation So far we have discussed two ways of handling time dependence. The most familiar is the Schr¨odingerrepresentation, where operators are constant, and states move in time. The Heisenberg representation does just the opposite; states are constant in time and operators move. The answer for any given physical quantity is of course independent of which is used. Here we discuss a third way of describing the time dependence, introduced by Dirac, known as the interaction representation, although it could equally well be called the Dirac representation. In this representation, both operators and states move in time. The interaction representation is particularly useful in problems involving time dependent external forces or potentials acting on a system. It also provides a route to the whole apparatus of quantum field theory and Feynman diagrams. This approach to field theory was pioneered by Dyson in the the 1950's. Here we will study the interaction representation in quantum mechanics, but develop the formalism in enough detail that the road to field theory can be followed. We consider an ordinary non-relativistic system where the Hamiltonian is broken up into two parts. It is almost always true that one of these two parts is going to be handled in perturbation theory, that is order by order. Writing our Hamiltonian we have H = H0 + V (1) Here H0 is the part of the Hamiltonian we have under control. It may not be particularly simple. For example it could be the full Hamiltonian of an atom or molecule. Neverthe- less, we assume we know all we need to know about the eigenstates of H0: The V term in H is the part we do not have control over.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Quantum Theory AMATH473/673, PHYS454
    Advanced Quantum Theory AMATH473/673, PHYS454 Achim Kempf Department of Applied Mathematics University of Waterloo Canada c Achim Kempf, September 2017 (Please do not copy: textbook in progress) 2 Contents 1 A brief history of quantum theory 9 1.1 The classical period . 9 1.2 Planck and the \Ultraviolet Catastrophe" . 9 1.3 Discovery of h ................................ 10 1.4 Mounting evidence for the fundamental importance of h . 11 1.5 The discovery of quantum theory . 11 1.6 Relativistic quantum mechanics . 13 1.7 Quantum field theory . 14 1.8 Beyond quantum field theory? . 16 1.9 Experiment and theory . 18 2 Classical mechanics in Hamiltonian form 21 2.1 Newton's laws for classical mechanics cannot be upgraded . 21 2.2 Levels of abstraction . 22 2.3 Classical mechanics in Hamiltonian formulation . 23 2.3.1 The energy function H contains all information . 23 2.3.2 The Poisson bracket . 25 2.3.3 The Hamilton equations . 27 2.3.4 Symmetries and Conservation laws . 29 2.3.5 A representation of the Poisson bracket . 31 2.4 Summary: The laws of classical mechanics . 32 2.5 Classical field theory . 33 3 Quantum mechanics in Hamiltonian form 35 3.1 Reconsidering the nature of observables . 36 3.2 The canonical commutation relations . 37 3.3 From the Hamiltonian to the equations of motion . 40 3.4 From the Hamiltonian to predictions of numbers . 44 3.4.1 Linear maps . 44 3.4.2 Choices of representation . 45 3.4.3 A matrix representation . 46 3 4 CONTENTS 3.4.4 Example: Solving the equations of motion for a free particle with matrix-valued functions .
    [Show full text]
  • The Path Integral Approach to Quantum Mechanics Lecture Notes for Quantum Mechanics IV
    The Path Integral approach to Quantum Mechanics Lecture Notes for Quantum Mechanics IV Riccardo Rattazzi May 25, 2009 2 Contents 1 The path integral formalism 5 1.1 Introducingthepathintegrals. 5 1.1.1 Thedoubleslitexperiment . 5 1.1.2 An intuitive approach to the path integral formalism . .. 6 1.1.3 Thepathintegralformulation. 8 1.1.4 From the Schr¨oedinger approach to the path integral . .. 12 1.2 Thepropertiesofthepathintegrals . 14 1.2.1 Pathintegralsandstateevolution . 14 1.2.2 The path integral computation for a free particle . 17 1.3 Pathintegralsasdeterminants . 19 1.3.1 Gaussianintegrals . 19 1.3.2 GaussianPathIntegrals . 20 1.3.3 O(ℏ) corrections to Gaussian approximation . 22 1.3.4 Quadratic lagrangians and the harmonic oscillator . .. 23 1.4 Operatormatrixelements . 27 1.4.1 Thetime-orderedproductofoperators . 27 2 Functional and Euclidean methods 31 2.1 Functionalmethod .......................... 31 2.2 EuclideanPathIntegral . 32 2.2.1 Statisticalmechanics. 34 2.3 Perturbationtheory . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 35 2.3.1 Euclidean n-pointcorrelators . 35 2.3.2 Thermal n-pointcorrelators. 36 2.3.3 Euclidean correlators by functional derivatives . ... 38 0 0 2.3.4 Computing KE[J] and Z [J] ................ 39 2.3.5 Free n-pointcorrelators . 41 2.3.6 The anharmonic oscillator and Feynman diagrams . 43 3 The semiclassical approximation 49 3.1 Thesemiclassicalpropagator . 50 3.1.1 VanVleck-Pauli-Morette formula . 54 3.1.2 MathematicalAppendix1 . 56 3.1.3 MathematicalAppendix2 . 56 3.2 Thefixedenergypropagator. 57 3.2.1 General properties of the fixed energy propagator . 57 3.2.2 Semiclassical computation of K(E)............. 61 3.2.3 Two applications: reflection and tunneling through a barrier 64 3 4 CONTENTS 3.2.4 On the phase of the prefactor of K(xf ,tf ; xi,ti) ....
    [Show full text]
  • Superconducting Transmon Machines
    Quantum Computing Hardware Platforms: Superconducting Transmon Machines • CSC591/ECE592 – Quantum Computing • Fall 2020 • Professor Patrick Dreher • Research Professor, Department of Computer Science • Chief Scientist, NC State IBM Q Hub 3 November 2020 Superconducting Transmon Quantum Computers 1 5 November 2020 Patrick Dreher Outline • Introduction – Digital versus Quantum Computation • Conceptual design for superconducting transmon QC hardware platforms • Construction of qubits with electronic circuits • Superconductivity • Josephson junction and nonlinear LC circuits • Transmon design with example IBM chip layout • Working with a superconducting transmon hardware platform • Quantum Mechanics of Two State Systems - Rabi oscillations • Performance characteristics of superconducting transmon hardware • Construct the basic CNOT gate • Entangled transmons and controlled gates • Appendices • References • Quantum mechanical solution of the 2 level system 3 November 2020 Superconducting Transmon Quantum Computers 2 5 November 2020 Patrick Dreher Digital Computation Hardware Platforms Based on a Base2 Mathematics • Design principle for a digital computer is built on base2 mathematics • Identify voltage changes in electrical circuits that map base2 math into a “zero” or “one” corresponding to an on/off state • Build electrical circuits from simple on/off states that apply these basic rules to construct digital computers 3 November 2020 Superconducting Transmon Quantum Computers 3 5 November 2020 Patrick Dreher From Previous Lectures It was
    [Show full text]
  • Pictures and Equations of Motion in Lagrangian Quantum Field Theory
    Pictures and equations of motion in Lagrangian quantum field theory Bozhidar Z. Iliev ∗ † ‡ Short title: Picture of motion in QFT Basic ideas: → May–June, 2001 Began: → May 12, 2001 Ended: → August 5, 2001 Initial typeset: → May 18 – August 8, 2001 Last update: → January 30, 2003 Produced: → February 1, 2008 http://www.arXiv.org e-Print archive No.: hep-th/0302002 • r TM BO•/ HO Subject Classes: Quantum field theory 2000 MSC numbers: 2001 PACS numbers: 81Q99, 81T99 03.70.+k, 11.10Ef, 11.90.+t, 12.90.+b Key-Words: Quantum field theory, Pictures of motion, Schr¨odinger picture Heisenberg picture, Interaction picture, Momentum picture Equations of motion, Euler-Lagrange equations in quantum field theory Heisenberg equations/relations in quantum field theory arXiv:hep-th/0302002v1 1 Feb 2003 Klein-Gordon equation ∗Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling in Physics, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Boul. Tzarigradsko chauss´ee 72, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria †E-mail address: [email protected] ‡URL: http://theo.inrne.bas.bg/∼bozho/ Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Heisenberg picture and description of interacting fields 3 3 Interaction picture. I. Covariant formulation 6 4 Interaction picture. II. Time-dependent formulation 13 5 Schr¨odinger picture 18 6 Links between different time-dependent pictures of motion 20 7 The momentum picture 24 8 Covariant pictures of motion 28 9 Conclusion 30 References 31 Thisarticleendsatpage. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 33 Abstract The Heisenberg, interaction, and Schr¨odinger pictures of motion are considered in La- grangian (canonical) quantum field theory. The equations of motion (for state vectors and field operators) are derived for arbitrary Lagrangians which are polynomial or convergent power series in field operators and their first derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Fluctuation
    F EATURE Kavli IPMU Principal Investigator Eiichiro Komatsu Research Area： Theoretical Physics Quantum Fluctuation The 20th century has seen the remarkable is not well known to the public. This ingredient development of the Standard Model of elementary is not contained in the name of ΛCDM, but is particles and elds. The last piece, the Higgs particle, an indispensable part of the Standard Model of was discovered in 2012. In the 21st century, we are cosmology. It is the idea that our ultimate origin is witnessing the similarly remarkable development the quantum mechanical uctuation generated in of the Standard Model of cosmology. In his 2008 the early Universe. However remarkable it may sound, book on“ Cosmology” Steven Weinberg, who led this idea is consistent with all the observational data the development of particle physics, wrote“: This that have been collected so far for the Universe. new excitement in cosmology came as if on cue Furthermore, the evidence supporting this idea keeps for elementary particle physicists. By the 1980s the accumulating and is strengthened as we collect more Standard Model of elementary particles and elds data! It is likely that all the structures we see today in had become well established. Although signicant the Universe, such as galaxies, stars, planets, and lives, theoretical and experimental work continued, there ultimately originated from the quantum uctuation was now little contact between experiment and new in the early Universe. theoretical ideas, and without this contact, particle physics lost much of its liveliness. Cosmology now Borrowing energy from the vacuum offered the excitement that particle physicists had experienced in the 1960s and 1970s.” In quantum mechanics, we can borrow energy The Standard Model of cosmology is known from the vacuum if we promise to return it as the“ ΛCDM model”.
    [Show full text]